Search

Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with melphalan and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α is used to treat bulky, locally advanced melanoma and sarcoma. However, TNF toxicity suggests a need for better-tolerated drugs. Cilengitide (EMD 121974), a novel cyclic inhibitor of alpha-V integrins, has both anti-angiogenic and direct anti-tumor effects and is a possible alternative to TNF in ILP. In this study, rats bearing a hind limb soft tissue sarcoma underwent ILP using different combinations of melphalan, TNF and cilengitide in the perfusate. Further groups had intra-peritoneal (i.p.) injections of cilengitide or saline 2 hr before and 3 hr after ILP. A 77% response rate (RR) was seen in animals treated i.p. with cilengitide and perfused with melphalan plus cilengitide. The RR was 85% in animals treated i.p. with cilengitide and ILP using melphalan plus both TNF and cilengitide. Both RRs were significantly greater than those seen with melphalan or cilengitide alone. Histopathology showed that high RRs were accompanied by disruption of tumor vascular endothelium and tumor necrosis. Compared with ILP using melphalan alone, the addition of cilengitide resulted in a three to sevenfold increase in melphalan concentration in tumor but not in muscle in the perfused limb. Supportive in vitro studies indicate that cilengitide both inhibits tumor cell attachment and increases endothelial permeability. Since cilengitide has low toxicity, these data suggest the agent is a good alternative to TNF in the ILP setting., (Copyright © 2012 UICC.)

Background: Nonresectable primary and metastatic liver tumors remain an important clinical problem. Melphalan-based isolated hepatic perfusion (M-IHP) leads to more than 70% objective responses in selective groups of patients with nonresectable metastases confined to the liver. Complete responses are rare and progression-free survival is limited. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF), a very active agent in isolated limb perfusion, is linked to serious hepatotoxicity, restricting its use in IHP. Because of its vasoactive properties, histamine (Hi) is an alternative to TNF. In this article we evaluate its potential synergistic effect in M-IHP, improving response rates., Methods: Our experimental rat IHP model is used for the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma liver metastases. Blood samples are collected for monitoring liver enzymes. Livers are excised 72 h and 7 days after treatment for histologic evaluation., Results: After sham-IHP and Hi-IHP, tumor progression was observed in 100% of treated animals, while after M-IHP this number fell to 62% and after Hi + M-IHP it fell to only 22% (P = 0.006). Overall response rates were of 55% for Hi + M-IHP vs. 25% for M-IHP, and, more importantly, complete responses (CR) were observed only after Hi + M-IHP (22%) (P = 0.009). Hepatotoxicity peaked within 24 h after IHP, independent of the treatment administered, recovered in 48 h, and was related mainly to the elevation of transaminases (grade 3 ASAT and grade 1 ALAT for control group and grades 3 and 4, respectively, for all other treatments). No serious systemic toxicity was observed. Histology of the liver showed no serious damage., Conclusion: Hi + M-IHP has synergistic antitumor effects without any increase in regional or systemic toxicity.