Search

Background The aim of the present study is to evaluate the utility of extraction versus non-extraction-based commercial melatonin ELISA kits for determining the melatonin concentration in amniotic fluid obtained in early and late pregnancy. Methods Pregnancy duration less than 28 weeks was defined as early and from 28 weeks until delivery as late gestation. Nine samples were obtained in early and 18 in late pregnancy. Two commercially available melatonin ELISA kits (melatonin ELISA RE54021, including methanol-based extraction and direct saliva melatonin ELISA RE 54041, not including an extraction step, both from IBL-International, Germany) were used to determine melatonin concentrations in amniotic fluid. Results The mean melatonin concentration in ELISAs assayed by the non-extraction was significantly lower than those assayed after extraction. Subgroup analysis showed that there was no significant difference between melatonin concentration measured by non-extraction versus extraction ELISA in early pregnancy (11.2 ± 7.4 vs. 12.2 ± 7.7, respectively, P = 0.463) but that the mean melatonin concentration in late pregnancy was significantly lower when assayed by non-extraction ELISA than when assayed by extraction ELISA (14.8 ± 9.3 vs. 145.1 ± 179.3, respectively; P < 0.001). Agreement between both measurements in late pregnancy was rather poor (r 2  = 0.271, P = 0.022), as opposed to the good correlation found in early pregnancy (r 2  = 0.929, P < 0.001). Conclusions The present study revealed that a melatonin assay without an extraction step, such as direct saliva ELISA, does not seem to be a valid method to determine the melatonin concentration of amniotic fluid, especially in late gestation.

Background and Aims: Melatonin (MT) is rapidly transferred from the maternal to fetal circulation in humans. There is little knowledge about factors which influence the MT concentration (MTc) in the umbilical cord (UC) blood during delivery. The aim of our study was to evaluate the MT status in the UC blood according to the time and mode of delivery., Subjects and Methods: Blood samples from umbilical artery (UA) and vein (UV) were collected from spontaneous vaginal deliveries (SVD, n=122) and cesarean section deliveries (CSD, n=188). MTc was measured using a commercially available radioimmunoassay., Results: The MTc was not significantly different between UA and UV blood both at daytime and at nighttime (p=0.216 and p=0.440, respectively). Both in UA and in UV, the MTc was significantly higher at nighttime than at daytime (p<0.0001). Compared with the CSD group, MTc in the SVD group was significantly higher both at night- and daytime (p<0.05). MTc both in UA and in UV was found to be not significantly different between patients with and without risk factors for stress including pregnancy complications (e.g., preeclampsia) and intrapartum complications (e.g., emergency section, pathological doppler, and pathological cardiotocography) (p>0.05)., Conclusion: Our study revealed for the first time that MTc both in UA and in UV depends on modus of labor. In agreement with other studies, we found a clear circadian MT rhythm in the UC blood of neonates. The results of our study may suggest to a physiological role of MT at the onset of labor., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)