Search

Treatment of melanoma remains a challenge in advanced disease. Recently, the molecular differentiation in BRAF-mutated, NRAS-mutated and c-kit-mutated melanomas led to new treatment strategies. Different trials show that imatinib or nilotinib lead to meaningful responses in c-kit-mutated melanoma patients. There are little published data on sequential inhibition using these two drugs in melanoma. We describe the sequential use of imatinib after nilotinib in a c-kit-mutated melanoma patient, who progressed on interferon, Allovectin, dacarbazine, nilotinib and ipilimumab, and was finally treated with the c-kit inhibitor imatinib. From July 2011 to September 2011, the patient received ipilimumab (four doses with 3 mg/kg). Clinical assessment after immunotherapy showed disease progression. Therefore, a treatment change to imatinib 800 mg daily was made from February 2012 to May 2013. Under this treatment, the patient showed a partial response as per the RECIST criteria. The present lesions continued responding (computed tomography scans: May 2012-March 2013). Unfortunately, in October 2012, new brain metastases developed. Nevertheless, the use of c-kit inhibitors in c-kit-mutated melanoma patients seems to be a promising treatment option. Furthermore, a delayed response to ipilimumab after 6 months could also have led to or supported the partial response in this case. However, when two biologically similar compounds are administered in a melanoma patient and the tumour mass shows progressive disease upon administration of the first agent, an additional progression with no effect may be expected when the second one is used. This case shows, in contrast, that the use of imatinib after progression upon nilotinib can be beneficial.

Background: Treatment with selective BRAF or MEK inhibitors is frequently associated with cutaneous toxicities, including squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), papillomas and rash. These cutaneous adverse effects are typically observed at a lower incidence during combined BRAF and MEK inhibitor therapy., Patients and Methods: Two male patients with stage IV metastatic BRAF-mutated melanoma were treated with a combination of a selective BRAF inhibitor and a selective MEK inhibitor (dabrafenib and trametinib, or encorafenib (LGX818) and binimetinib (MEK162)) within two different clinical trials. Ten and 150 days after treatment start respectively, the patients developed painful nodules on the legs. In addition, one patient developed symmetrical articulation pain and intermittent fever episodes., Results: Based on the clinical and histological presentation, erythema nodosum-like panniculitis was diagnosed in both cases. No other aetiology could be found. After receiving topical or oral steroid treatment and anti-inflammatory analgesics, the painful nodular lesions disappeared several weeks later. In one case, a rebound of the painful nodules was observed when the combination treatment (dabrafenib and trametinib) was resumed after a 1-week unscheduled treatment interruption., Conclusions: Panniculitis has previously been described in association with BRAF inhibitor treatment, but not MEK inhibitor treatment. Combination treatment is usually associated with a lower incidence of cutaneous adverse events (AEs), as compared to monotherapy. Panniculitis was observed in two patients during combined BRAF and MEK inhibitor treatment. These cases illustrate the need for further research in a larger patient population to identify a possible link between combined BRAF and MEK inhibitor treatment and the incidence of panniculitis.