Search

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are among the most promising treatment options for melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While ICIs can induce effective anti-tumor responses, they may also drive serious immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Identifying biomarkers to predict which patients will suffer from irAEs would enable more accurate clinical risk-benefit analysis for ICI treatment and may also shed light on common or distinct mechanisms underpinning treatment success and irAEs., Methods: In this prospective multi-center study, we combined a multi-omics approach including unbiased single-cell profiling of over 300 peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples and high-throughput proteomics analysis of over 500 serum samples to characterize the systemic immune compartment of patients with melanoma or NSCLC before and during treatment with ICIs., Findings: When we combined the parameters obtained from the multi-omics profiling of patient blood and serum, we identified potential predictive biomarkers for ICI-induced irAEs. Specifically, an early increase in CXCL9/CXCL10/CXCL11 and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) 1 to 2 weeks after the start of therapy are likely indicators of heightened risk of developing irAEs. In addition, an early expansion of Ki-67 + regulatory T cells (Tregs) and Ki-67 + CD8 + T cells is also likely to be associated with increased risk of irAEs., Conclusions: We suggest that the combination of these cellular and proteomic biomarkers may help to predict which patients are likely to benefit most from ICI therapy and those requiring intensive monitoring for irAEs., Funding: This work was primarily funded by the European Research Council, the Swiss National Science Foundation, the Swiss Cancer League, and the Forschungsförderung of the Kantonsspital St. Gallen., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests L.F. has/had advisory roles for Novartis, Sanofi, Philogen, and Bristol-Myers Squibb, all which took place outside the submitted work. P.A.A. has/had consultant/advisory roles for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche-Genentech, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Array BioPharma, Merck Serono, Pierre Fabre, Incyte, MedImmune, AstraZeneca, Syndax, Sun Pharma, Sanofi, Idera, Ultimovacs, Sandoz, Immunocore, 4SC, Alkermes, Italfarmaco, Nektar, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eisai, Regeneron, Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, Oncosec, Nouscom, Takis, Lunaphore Technologies, Seattle Genetics, ITeos Therapeutics, Medicenna, Bio-Al Health, and ValoTx; he also received research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche-Genentech, Array, Sanofi, and Pfizer, as well as travel support from Merck Sharp & Dhome and Pfizer, all which was outside the submitted work. T.A. served as consultant to Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, and CeCaVa; received travel support from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Novartis; received speaker fees from Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pierre Fabre, and CeCaVa; received institutional funding from Neracare, Novartis, Sanofi, and SkylineDX; and received institutional research grants from Novartis outside the submitted work. R.D. has intermittent, project-focused consulting and/or advisory relationships with Novartis, Merck Sharp & Dhome, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Amgen, Takeda, Pierre Fabre, Sun Pharma, Sanofi, Catalym, Second Genome, Regeneron, Alligator, T3 Pharma, MaxiVAX SA, Pfizer, and touchIME, all which took place outside the submitted work. W.v.d.V. declares research support from the Novartis research foundation and the PROMEDICA Stiftung and serves as a consultant for Mabylon outside the submitted work. S.U. declares research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Merck Serono; speakers and advisory board honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck Serono, Novartis, and Roche; and travel support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Pierre Fabre outside the submitted work. L.Z. declares speakers and advisory board honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, and Sunpharma; research support from Novartis; and travel support from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Sunpharma, and Novartis outside the submitted work. F.D. receives/received honoraria and travel support from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Sun Pharma outside the submitted work. L.H. declares research support from Therakos and speakers and advisory board honoraria from Amgen, BiomeDx, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Curevac, Merck, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Myoncare, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, SUN, and Roche, outside the submitted work. M.E. declares honoraria and travel support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Immunocore, and Novartis outside the submitted work. R.K. declares travel support from Pierre Fabre and Sun Pharma outside the submitted work. M.J. declares advisory roles (institutional) for Novartis, AstraZeneca, Basilea Pharmaceutica, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Debiopharm, Merck Sharp & Dhome, Roche, and Sanofi; research funding from Swiss Cancer Research; and travel grants from Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda. D.S. has/had consultant/advisory roles in the last 3 years for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Array, Merck Serono, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Sun Pharma, Sanofi, Regeneron, Ultimovacs, Sandoz, Immunocore, 4SC, Neracare, Nektar, Daiichi Sankyo, Oncosec, Amgen, BioCon, Immatics, InFlarX, Innovent, Labcorp, Replimune, and Haystack; his institution also received research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche-Genentech, Array, and Merck Sharp & Dhome, all of which took place outside the submitted work. N.K. received personal fees, travel costs, and speaker’s honoraria from Astellas, Novartis, Ipsen, and Photocure, all of which took place outside the submitted work. M.P.L. has received project-specific research funding from Roche, Novartis, Molecular Partners, and Oncobit., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced hepatitis belongs to the frequently occurring immune-related adverse events (irAEs), particularly with the combination therapy involving ipilimumab and nivolumab. However, predisposing factors predicting the occurrence of ICI-induced hepatitis are barely known. We investigated the association of preexisting autoantibodies in the development of ICI-induced hepatitis in a prospective cohort of cancer patients., Methods: Data from a prospective biomarker cohort comprising melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients were used to analyze the incidence of ICI-induced hepatitis, putatively associated factors, and outcome., Results: 40 patients with melanoma and 91 patients with NSCLC received ICI between July 2016 and May 2019. 11 patients developed ICI-induced hepatitis (8.4%). Prior to treatment, 45.5% of patients in the hepatitis cohort and 43.8% of the control cohort showed elevated titers of autoantibodies commonly associated with autoimmune liver diseases (p = 0.82). We found two nominally significant associations between the occurrence of ICI-induced hepatitis and HLA alleles associated with autoimmune liver diseases among NSCLC patients. Of note, significantly more patients with ICI-induced hepatitis developed additional irAEs in other organs (p = 0.0001). Neither overall nor progression-free survival was affected in the hepatitis group., Conclusion: We found nominally significant associations of ICI-induced hepatitis with two HLA alleles. ICI-induced hepatitis showed no correlation with liver-specific autoantibodies, but frequently co-occurred with irAEs affecting other organs. Unlike other irAEs, ICI-induced hepatitis is not associated with a better prognosis., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: Long-term survival of stage IV melanoma patients has improved significantly with the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (CIs). Reliable biomarkers to predict response and clinical outcome are needed., Methods: We investigated the role of melanoma-associated antibodies as predictive markers for CI therapy in two independent cohorts. In cohort 1, a prospective study, we measured specific antibodies before treatment, after one week and after six to nine weeks of treatment. Cohort 2 consisted of serum samples prior to CI therapy initiation. ELISA assays were performed to quantify specific IgG directed against melanocyte differentiation antigens tyrosinase-related proteins 1 and 2 (TRP1/TYRP1 and TRP2/TYRP2), glycoprotein 100 (gp100), MelanA/MART1, and the cancer-testis antigen NY-ESO-1. Response was defined as either complete or partial remission on CT scan according to RECIST 1.1., Results: In cohort 1, baseline levels of these antibodies were higher in the responder group, although statistical significance was only reached for NY-ESO-1 (p = 0.007). In cohort 2, significantly higher antibody baseline levels for MelanA/MART1 (p = 0.003) and gp100 (p = 0.029) were found. After pooling the results from both cohorts, higher levels of MelanA/MART1 (p = 0.013), TRP1/TYRP1 (p = 0.048), TRP2/TYRP2 (p = 0.047) and NY-ESO-1 (p = 0.005) specific antibodies at baseline were independently associated with response., Conclusions: Melanoma-associated antibodies may be candidate biomarkers for response and survival in metastatic melanoma patients being treated with CIs. These markers may be used to complement patient assessment, in combination with PD-L1 status, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and tumor mutational burden, with the aim to predict outcome of CI treatment in patients with metastatic melanoma., Trial Registration: Ethikkommission Ostschweiz, EKOS 16/079 https://ongoingprojects.swissethics.ch/runningProjects_list.php?q=%28BASECID~contains~2016-00998%29&orderby=dBASECID .

Background: Checkpoint inhibitors (CIs) are highly effective but can induce severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which cannot be predicted. We investigated whether human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes predispose to developing of irAEs during therapy and thus hold a predictive role., Methods: We established a prospective observational single-centre study and collected data from patients with either metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or metastatic melanoma, who were treated with anti-PD-1 (programmed cell death receptor 1), anti-CTLA4 (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4) or both CIs combined. Data include irAEs and ranges from 15th July 2016 until 10th May 2018. In addition, we performed HLA typing via next generation sequencing., Results: We enrolled 102 patients (median [range] age, 68 [62-74] years) with metastatic cancer in our study who received CI therapy. Of these patients, 59 (58%) developed one or more irAEs, among which pruritus (n = 32 (54%)) and rash (n = 24 (41%)) had the highest rates. We did not find evidence for a single HLA gene being associated with all irAEs (all P > .05). When assessing each irAE individually, we found a significant association between HLA-DRB1*11:01 and pruritus (OR = 4.53, X 2 1,95  = 9.45, P < .01) as well as a nominally significant additive association between HLA-DQB1*03:01 and colitis (OR = 3.94, X 2 1,95  = 5.67, P = .017)., Conclusions: The presence of two HLA alleles that are known to predispose to autoimmune diseases were associated with the development of pruritus or colitis during therapy, suggesting a genetic aetiology of irAEs. Larger genome-wide association studies should be performed to confirm our findings., (Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Prognosis of metastatic melanoma improved with the development of checkpoint inhibitors. The role of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in lymph node metastases of stage III melanoma remains unclear. We retrospectively characterized TILs in primary melanomas and matched lymph node metastases (stage III melanoma) of patients treated with the checkpoint inhibitor ipilimumab. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes were characterized for CD3, CD4, and CD8 expressions by immunohistochemistry. 4/9 patients (44%) responded to treatment with ipilimumab (1 complete and 2 partial remissions, 1 stable disease). All responders exhibited CD4 and CD8 T-cell infiltration in their lymph node metastases, whereas all non-responders did not show an infiltration of the lymph node metastasis with TILs. The correlation between the presence and absence of TILs in responders vs. non-responders was statistically significant (p = 0.008). Median distant metastases free survival, i.e., progression from stage III to stage IV melanoma, was similar in responders and non-responders (22.1 vs. 19.3 months; p = 0.462). Median progression free and overall survival show a trend in favor of the patients having TIL rich lymph node metastases (6.8 vs. 3.3 months, p = 0.09; and all alive at last follow-up vs. 8.2 months, respectively, p = 0.08). Our data suggest a correlation between the T-cell infiltration of the lymph node metastases in stage III melanoma and the response to ipilimumab once these patients progress to stage IV disease.