Search

Purpose: Infant and young childhood medulloblastoma (iMB) is usually treated without craniospinal irradiation (CSI) to avoid neurocognitive late effects. Unfortunately, many children relapse. The purpose of this study was to assess salvage strategies and prognostic features of patients with iMB who relapse after CSI-sparing therapy., Methods: We assembled a large international cohort of 380 patients with relapsed iMB, age younger than 6 years, and initially treated without CSI. Univariable and multivariable Cox models of postrelapse survival (PRS) were conducted for those treated with curative intent using propensity score analyses to account for confounding factors., Results: The 3-year PRS, for 294 patients treated with curative intent, was 52.4% (95% CI, 46.4 to 58.3) with a median time to relapse from diagnosis of 11 months. Molecular subgrouping was available for 150 patients treated with curative intent, and 3-year PRS for sonic hedgehog (SHH), group 4, and group 3 were 60%, 84%, and 18% ( P = .0187), respectively. In multivariable analysis, localized relapse ( P = .0073), SHH molecular subgroup ( P = .0103), CSI use after relapse ( P = .0161), and age ≥ 36 months at initial diagnosis ( P = .0494) were associated with improved survival. Most patients (73%) received salvage CSI, and although salvage chemotherapy was not significant in multivariable analysis, its use might be beneficial for a subset of children receiving salvage CSI < 35 Gy ( P = .007)., Conclusion: A substantial proportion of patients with relapsed iMB are salvaged after initial CSI-sparing approaches. Patients with SHH subgroup, localized relapse, older age at initial diagnosis, and those receiving salvage CSI show improved PRS. Future prospective studies should investigate optimal CSI doses and the role of salvage chemotherapy in this population., Competing Interests: Craig ErkerConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis Canada Pharmaceuticals Inc Martin MynarekEmployment: Novartis, BioNTech SE Maura MassiminoConsulting or Advisory Role: Oncoscience, Novartis Juliette HukinStock and Other Ownership Interests: AbbVieConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Novartis Vijay RamaswamyHonoraria: AstraZenecaConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca Canada Alvaro LassalettaStock and Other Ownership Interests: Gilead SciencesConsulting or Advisory Role: Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Servier, Alexion Pharmaceuticals Sébastien PerreaultLeadership: BayerStock and Other Ownership Interests: NovocureHonoraria: BayerConsulting or Advisory Role: BayerSpeakers' Bureau: BayerExpert Testimony: Bayer Cassie N. KlineResearch Funding: Regeneron (Inst), Curis (Inst), Midatech Pharma (Inst), Ipsen (Inst), Day One Therapeutics (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Kazia Therapeutics (Inst), Chimerix (Inst) Eric S. SandlerConsulting or Advisory Role: Protara Therapeutics Lindsey M. HoffmanHonoraria: AstraZeneca Kathleen DorrisStock and Other Ownership Interests: Amgen, Gilead SciencesConsulting or Advisory Role: Day One Biopharmaceuticals Helen ToledanoConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Novartis Derek S. TsangTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Mevion Medical Systems Jeffrey KnipsteinEmployment: PRA Health Sciences, ServierConsulting or Advisory Role: Atheneum Zhihong J. WangHonoraria: AstraZenecaConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZenecaSpeakers' Bureau: AstraZeneca Kenneth J. CohenConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, DNAtrixResearch Funding: Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb Jordan R. HansfordStock and Other Ownership Interests: AnteotechConsulting or Advisory Role: Bayer Sabine MuellerResearch Funding: Regeneron (Inst), DayOne Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Curis Pharamceuticals (Inst), Curis Pharamceuticals (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst) Amar GajjarConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche/Genentech, QED Therapeutics, Day One Therapeutics, Geanno BioResearch Funding: Genentech (Inst), Kazia Therapeutics (Inst) Stefan RutkowskiConsulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers Squibb GmbH & Co. KGaA, Germany, Celgene, Roche Pharma AG, Grenzach-Wyhlen, Bayer Germany Giles RobinsonResearch Funding: Novartis (Inst), Genentech/Roche (Inst), Novartis (Inst), SpringWorks Therapeutics (Inst) Eric BouffetConsulting or Advisory Role: NovartisResearch Funding: Roche (Inst) Lucie Lafay-CousinHonoraria: Servier, Innomar StrategiesNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Children under the age of 3 with medulloblastoma have an inferior survival to older children with this disease. This study reviewed the incidence, characteristics, therapy, and outcome of children less than 36 months of age diagnosed with medulloblastoma from 1990 to 2005 in Canada. Ninety-six cases were identified with a median age at diagnosis of 19.5 months. Forty-seven percent of patients had a complete resection, 25% a 90-95% near complete resection, 20% an incomplete (10-90%) resection, and 3% biopsy only. Therapy consisted of chemotherapy (90%), high dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue (13%), and radiation therapy (21%). The median survival time was 45 +/- 13.82 months. There was no significant difference in survival when comparing patients with <90% resection versus >90% resection, nor when comparing the presence of metastases versus their absence. There was a significant increase in survival time in patients who received radiation therapy compared to those who were not treated with this modality, as well as for those who were over 18 months at diagnosis compared to those under 18 months.

Purpose: To report the clinical course of adolescents with medulloblastoma, with specific emphasis on prognosis and pattern of relapse., Methods and Materials: We retrospectively studied the clinical course and outcomes of children aged 10-20 years with medulloblastoma, treated at centers throughout Canada between 1986 and 2003. To better assess time to relapse, a cohort of patients aged 3-20 years at diagnosis was generated., Results: A total of 72 adolescents were analyzed. Five-year overall survival and event-free survival rates were 78.3%+/-5.4% and 68.0%+/-6.2%, respectively. Late relapses occurred at a median of 3.0 years (range, 0.3-6.8 years). In univariate analysis, conventional risk stratification and the addition of chemotherapy to craniospinal radiation did not have prognostic significance. Female patients had improved overall survival (p=0.007). Time to relapse increased with age in a linear fashion. After relapse, patients faired poorly regardless of treatment modality. Patients who did not receive chemotherapy initially had improved progression-free survival at relapse (p=0.05)., Conclusions: Our study suggests that adolescents with medulloblastoma might have a unique prognosis and pattern of relapse, dissimilar to those in younger children. They might benefit from different risk stratifications and prolonged follow-up. These issues should be addressed in future prospective trials.

Background: Most reported data of chemoradiotherapy protocols for the treatment of medulloblastoma describe children who were treated in the first decade of life. To consider the feasibility of this approach in adolescents, the authors studied their clinical course with specific emphasis on toxicity, tolerability, and prognosis., Methods: In this retrospective study, the authors examined the toxicity profiles and outcomes of children age 10-20 years with medulloblastoma who were treated at centers throughout Canada between 1986 and 2003. Detailed toxicity data from 2 chemotherapy protocols were collected for teenagers and were compared with data from a group of control patients age 5-10 years., Results: In total, 72 teenagers were analyzed. Grade >/= 2 ototoxicity and neurotoxicity occurred in 45% and 71% of chemotherapy-treated patients, respectively. Grade 3-4 hematotoxicty occurred in 95% of patients. Toxicity resulted in delay of treatment for 73% of patients and dose modification in 75% of patients, including protocol discontinuation in 25% of patients. Weight loss > 10% was encountered in 73% of patients and required intervention in 45% of patients. Teenagers had significantly more hematotoxicity and neurotoxicity compared with controls on both chemotherapeutic protocols. Ototoxicity was similar in both age groups. Toxicity resulted in significantly more treatment delays and dose modifications in teenager patients compared with controls. The 5-year overall and event-free survival rates (+/- standard deviation) were 78% +/- 6% and 70% +/- 6%, respectively. The mean time (+/- standard deviation) to disease recurrence was 3.2 +/- 2.2 years., Conclusions: The increased toxicity rate and high incidence of treatment modifications in this study suggested that current pediatric protocols may require modifications for teenagers with medulloblastoma. The results highlighted several issues that should be addressed in future prospective trials., ((c) 2005 American Cancer Society.)