1. Readiness redefined: A behavioral task during screening predicted 1-year weight loss in the look AHEAD study
- Author
-
Brent Van Dorsten, Thomas A. Wadden, James O. Hill, Rebecca S. Reeves, Marci E. Gluck, Edward W. Lipkin, Adam G. Tsai, Andrea Anderson, Anthony N. Fabricatore, Robert W. Jeffery, John P. Foreyt, and Allison J. Higginbotham
- Subjects
Gerontology ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Nutrition and Dietetics ,business.industry ,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism ,Attendance ,Medicine (miscellaneous) ,medicine.disease ,Obesity ,Endocrinology ,Weight loss ,Physical therapy ,Medicine ,Attrition ,Patient participation ,medicine.symptom ,business ,Body mass index ,Mass screening ,Screening procedures - Abstract
Currently, 34% of U.S. adults are obese.1 The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends that all adults with a body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2 be offered intensive counseling for weight loss, or be referred to programs that offer it.2 However, it is not practical to provide intensive counseling to such a large number of individuals. If patient selection could be improved, weight loss programs might achieve lower attrition rates and improved weight losses. The NIH guidelines on evaluation and treatment of obesity state that readiness for weight loss should be assessed in persons presenting for treatment, while noting that such assessment is “easier said than done.”3 However, a recent review challenged the notion that weight loss readiness – a person’s self-reported desire and willingness to make changes to lose weight – is important to assess in clinical settings.4 Self-reported readiness, the review concluded, predicted neither treatment adherence nor the magnitude of weight loss among persons pursuing a variety of weight control methods. The authors suggested that the lack of significant findings may be a function of the limited range of readiness among people who voluntarily engage in weight loss programs. Another explanation may be the limitation of self-report assessments of readiness. Individuals may overestimate their readiness because they do not clearly understand what behaviors are needed to make them successful, or because they greatly desire the outcome of weight loss. We examined the ability of a behavioral task at screening to predict weight loss, session attendance, and physical activity at 1 year among participants who received an intensive lifestyle intervention in the Look AHEAD study.5 Look AHEAD’s careful screening procedures included a 2-week run-in period, in which candidates were required to record (but not required to alter) their food intake for at least 12 of 14 days.6 Look AHEAD investigators believed that participants’ keeping food records during the run-in would predict record keeping during treatment. Keeping food records during treatment, in turn, is positively correlated with weight loss.7–12 Thus, in the current study, we assessed performance of a specific behavior, expected to be related to weight loss, rather than asking about general readiness to lose weight. We specifically sought to determine whether the completeness of record keeping during the screening period would predict weight loss outcomes at 1 year.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF