Search

Background As the incidence of pancreatic adenocarcinoma increases, so has the utilization of neoadjuvant therapy. The objective of this study was to evaluate outcomes in patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy or surgery first for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods The ACS-NSQIP 2014–2015 targeted pancreatectomy variables were queried for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent resection. Outcomes of those receiving neoadjuvant therapy were compared to surgery first using a multivariate, logistic regression model. Results 3408 patients underwent pancreatectomy; 2596 proximal pancreatectomies, 741 distal pancreatectomies, 64 total pancreatectomies and 7 other pancreatic procedures were performed. Of the 3408 patients identified, 934 (27.5%) received neoadjuvant therapy: 496 chemotherapy alone, 28 radiation alone, and 410 combined chemotherapy/radiation therapy. Overall morbidity and mortality were similar between patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy versus those who underwent surgery first. Neoadjuvant treatment was associated with lower rates of pancreatic fistulas (10.2% vs. 13.2%, P = 0.017), but higher intra/postoperative transfusion rates (27.4% vs. 20.3%, P Conclusions Neoadjuvant therapy appeared to be safe prior to operative intervention as no difference in overall postoperative morbidity or mortality rates were identified. There were increased intra/postoperative transfusions in the neoadjuvant therapy group, but neoadjuvant therapy was associated with lower rates of pancreatic fistulas.

Percutaneous cholecystostomy tube (PCT) placement serves as a treatment option for acute cholecystitis in elderly and critically ill patients. The objective of this study was to compare PCT and cholecystectomy outcomes over time.PCTs placed from April 1, 1998, to December 31, 2009 (time period 2) were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent cholecystectomies served as matched controls. Institutional data from March 1, 1989, to March 31, 1998 (time period 1) were reviewed to compare trends.A total of 143 patients successfully underwent PCT placement in time period 2. When compared with patients undergoing cholecystectomy, PCT patients had a higher rate of cardiovascular disease (66% vs 26%, P = 0.001), diabetes (27% vs 13%, P = 0.001), and a higher mean Charlson comorbidity index (3.27 vs 1.07, P = 0.001). Compared with the first time period, patients undergoing PCT in the second time period had lower American Society of Anesthesiologist's classifications (American Society of Anesthesiologist's class I, II: 0% vs 18%, P = 0.001). Thirty-day mortality decreased from 36% to 12% in patients undergoing PCT (P = 0.001).Among patients with acute cholecystitis, percutaneous cholecystostomy tubes were placed in older patients with increased comorbidities compared to cholecystectomy. Mortality rates after PCT decreased over time.

Surgical resection offers the only treatment associated with long-term survival for colorectal cancer (CRC) with hepatic metastasis. Imaging studies are paramount for the identification of potential surgical candidates. Synchronous hepatic disease is identified at presentation in 20–30 % of patients and ultimately, hepatic metastases occur in over 50 % of patients diagnosed with CRC. Computed tomography (CT) has been the imaging standard to identify patients with hepatic metastasis, but the array of preoperative imaging has expanded over the past several years. Currently, ultrasound, CT, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography all play a vital role in the management and treatment of stage IV CRC. In addition, patient characteristics such as steatosis and treatment such as neoadjuvant chemotherapy affect imaging of hepatic metastases. The goal of this review is to discuss the current standing of imaging modalities used in the perioperative care of patients with colorectal liver metastasis.

Background and Objectives Patient-centered care is recommended by the Institute of Medicine to build a better healthcare system. The aim of this study was to audit patient-centered quality measures (QM) to create a breast center report card that could be provided to patients for education and informed consent. Methods An IRB approved retrospective review of 695 patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer was conducted to audit the components of one step surgery and other QM. Results The intraoperative sensitivity to detect node positive patients was 25% (2/8), 27% (9/34), and 87% (68/78) for pN0(i+), pN1mi, pN1 patients, respectively. The re-excision lumpectomy rate was 15% (72/471) and the one step surgery success rate, which included lumpectomy and mastectomy patients, was 86% (598/695). Patient self-assessment of “very good to excellent” cosmesis and pain control were 77% (103/134) and 83% (60/72). Local recurrence rate was 2% (12/695) at a mean 3.1-year follow-up. Conclusions The components of care that contribute to a patient-centered assessment of breast cancer surgery are measurable. “Bundling” of QM creates a perioperative report card that aids patients' informed consent and provides a framework for future comparative effectiveness studies. J. Surg. Oncol. J. Surg. Oncol. 2010;102:34–38. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.