Search

PURPOSE Adjuvant trastuzumab reduces invasive breast cancer (IBC) recurrence and risk for death in patients with HER2-amplified or overexpressing IBC. A subset of patients in the landmark trastuzumab adjuvant trials who originally tested HER2-positive but were HER2-negative by central HER2 testing appeared to possibly benefit from trastuzumab. The objective for the NSABP B-47 trial was to determine whether the addition of trastuzumab to adjuvant chemotherapy (CRx) would improve invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 3,270 women with high-risk primary IBC were randomly assigned to CRx with or without 1 year of trastuzumab. Eligibility criteria included immunohistochemistry (IHC) score 1+ or 2+ with fluorescence in situ hybridization ratio (FISH) < 2.0 or, if ratio was not performed, HER2 gene copy number < 4.0. CRx was either docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide or doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by weekly paclitaxel for 12 weeks. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 46 months, the addition of trastuzumab to CRx did not improve IDFS (5-year IDFS: 89.8% with CRx plus trastuzumab [CRxT] v 89.2% with CRx alone; hazard ratio [HR], 0.98; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.25; P = .85). These findings did not differ by level of HER2 IHC expression, lymph node involvement, or hormone-receptor status. For distant recurrence-free interval, 5-year estimates were 92.7% with CRxT compared with 93.6% for CRx alone (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.50; P = .55) and for overall survival (OS) were 94.8% with CRxT and 96.3% in CRx alone (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.95; P = .15). There were no unexpected toxicities from the addition of trastuzumab to CRx. CONCLUSION The addition of trastuzumab to CRx did not improve IDFS, distant recurrence-free interval, or OS in women with non-HER2–overexpressing IBC. Trastuzumab does not benefit women without IHC 3+ or FISH ratio-amplified breast cancer.

TPS264 Background: Clinical improvements for locally advanced rectal cancer have been relatively static over the past few decades. While immunotherapy shows no benefit in microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer, preclinical models suggest that radiotherapy (RT) can enhance neoantigen presentation, modulate the microenvironment, and improve the likelihood of anti-tumor activity with checkpoint inhibitor use. Using a “window-of-opportunity” study design, this prospective phase II trial will determine the safety and activity of this approach with the anti-PD-L1 agent durvalumab (MEDI4736). Methods: This multi-center phase II trial is currently enrolling patients (pts) with rectal cancer who are undergoing standard NCCN guideline-compliant neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Eligibility includes pts with MSS stage II-IV rectal cancer with adequate organ function and pre-treatment diagnostic tumor available for profiling with intent to proceed to surgical resection after CRT. Stage IV disease must be limited such that the primary pelvic tumor requires definitive management. Standard ineligibility criteria include active infections, systemic steroid use, or other conditions making immunotherapy use unsafe. Treatment includes durvalumab (750mg IV infusion once every 2 wks) for 4 total doses beginning within 3-7 days after CRT completion. Surgery must be within 8-12 wks of the final CRT dose. Primary endpoint is a demonstrated improvement in Neoadjuvant Rectal Cancer (NAR) score compared to historical controls targeting a 20% relative risk reduction in DFS and 3-4% absolute OS improvement. Secondary endpoints include OS, DFS, toxicity, pCR, cCR, therapy completion, negative surgical margins, sphincter preservation, off-target “abscopal” effects for the subset of stage IV pts, and exploratory assessments of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, tumor Immunoscore, circulating immunologic profiles, and molecular predictors of response. A safety run-in phase has completed as a precedent to full enrollment. Enrollment now continues to 47 total pts to achieve 41 surgically evaluable pts. Support: AstraZeneca-Medimmune, NSABP Foundation. Clinical trial information: NCT03102047.

521 Background: S0221 investigated weekly vs q 2 week dosing of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) and paclitaxel (P) in patients (pts) with high risk early breast cancer as previously reported (JCO 33:58-64, 2015). After enrollment of 2716 pts randomization to the two AC arms was stopped for futility and an additional 578 pts received 4 cycles of q 2 week AC and were randomized to P weekly (Pw) or P q 2 weeks (P2). We report updated results of the original trial design and the first report of the 578 pts treated with AC x 4 and Pw x 12 or P2 x 6. Methods: Between December 2003 and November 2010, 2716 pts were randomized in a 2x2 factorial design to 1) 15 weeks of weekly AC (A 24 mg/m2/week and C 60 mg/m2/day po) vs 6 cycles of q 2 week AC (A 60 mg/m2 and C 600 mg/m2) and 2) Pw (paclitaxel 80 mg/m2/week x 12) vs P2 (paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 q 2 weeks x 6), with growth factor support as previously described. After study amendment 578 patients received 4 cycles of q 2 week AC followed by Pw or P2. Updated survival was assessed using log-rank tests and Cox regression models. Results: At a median follow-up of 8.5 years, among the pts treated in the original protocol, there were no significant differences among the four treatments for DFS (p=0.21) or OS (p=0.08). The triple-negative subset had worse DFS (P

Purpose An anthracycline-based combination followed by, or combined with, a taxane is the sequence used in most adjuvant chemotherapy regimens. We hypothesized that administering the taxane before the anthracycline combination would be associated with fewer dose reductions and delays than the reverse sequence. To test this hypothesis, a randomized phase II multicenter adjuvant chemotherapy trial was performed. Patients and Methods Fifty-six patients with axillary node-positive, nonmetastatic breast cancer were randomly assigned either to group A (docetaxel [DOC] 75 mg/m2 intravenously [IV] every 14 days for four cycles followed by doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 [AC] IV every 14 days for four cycles); or to group B (AC followed by DOC) at the identical doses and schedule. Pegfilgrastim 6 mg subcutaneous injection was administered 1 day after the chemotherapy in all treatment cycles. The primary objective was to administer DOC without dose reductions or delays before or after AC and calculate the relative dose intensity (RDI) of DOC and AC. Results The majority of toxicities were grade 0 to 2 irrespective of sequence. The RDI for DOC was 0.96 and 0.82, respectively, in groups A (DOC followed by AC) and B (AC followed by DOC), with more frequent dose reductions occurring in group B (46% v 18%). The RDI for AC was 0.95 and 0.98 in groups A and B, respectively. Conclusion The administration of DOC before AC results in fewer DOC dose reductions and a higher RDI than the reverse sequence. Larger trials evaluating the sequence of DOC before anthracyclines are justified.

1016 Background: Assessment of the outcome of minority populations within clinical trials may give insight into important tumor and host factors relevant to those populations. Methods: S0221 is a p...

1004 Background: AC+G (doxorubicin 24 mg/m2/week x 15, cyclophosphamide 60 mg/m2/day po, and filgrastim daily except on the days of doxorubicin administration) produced encouraging results in a SWO...