Search

Purpose: To determine the prevalence of keratoconus (KC) in relation to ethnicity in N. Macedonia. Methods: This was a cross-sectional, interventional retrospective study. Chart reviews were performed for all new patients attending between January 2016 and January 2020 at the Sistina Ophthalmology Hospital in Skopje. All patients were screened, KC diagnosis and classification was based on the corneal topography. Ethnicity and gender classifications were according to patients’ self-opinions. Results: A total of 2812 patients charts reviewed. The mean age was 31.71 years (SD, ±9.73), 1209 (43%) were male. 2050 (72.9%) declared themselves as Macedonians, 649 (23.1%) Albanians, 76 (2.7%) Turks and 37 (1.3%) in other ethnicities. Differences in age between the ethnic groups was statistically significant (𝑥2=90.225, pConclusion: The prevalence of KC at a refractive surgery practice in N.Macedonia is much higher compared with general population and similar to the prevalence in Middle East Asia. Nationwide screening programs are needed to diagnose the disease earlier.

Introduction: Refractive surgery procedures, transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (T- PRK) and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (Fs-LASIK) are regarded as safe and efficacious methods for correcting myopia and myopic astigmatism. These two methods do not have much differences in results when treating spherical myopia, while some differences does exist in treatment of myopic astigmatism. Vector analysis presents powerful tool to show the real differences between these two methods regarding higher order ocular aberrations and central corneal thickness of treated eyes. Aim: The aim of the study is to investigate changes in higher order ocular aberrations (HOAs) and central corneal thickness (CCT) following treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism above -5.00DS and up to -2.00DC after either T-PRK or Fs-LASIK. Methods: Patients (30 eyes per group) underwent T- PRK (group I) or Fs-LASIK (group II) procedure using Schwind Amaris 750S laser. HOAs (3mm&5mm pupil) and CCT were measured objectively at pre-, 1, 3 & 6 months postop in each case. Results: Key results at 6 months were: i) mean values of trefoil (5mm pupil) were 0.092μm (sd, 0.055, 95% CI 0.072 to 0.112) & 0.126μm (sd, 0.078, 95% CI 0.098 to 0.154) in group I, and 0.088μm (sd, 0.058, 95% CI 0.067 to 0.109) & 0.064μm (sd, 0.034, 95% CI 0.052 to 0.076) in group II (P=0.001 at 6 months) ; ii) Changes in CCT (ΔCCT) and best spherical equivalent correction (ΔBSE) was significant in group II (ΔCCT=-26.55[ΔBSE]-14.06, R=0.486, P=0.006) but not in group I (p=0.034). Conclusions: After T-PRK trefoil is worse than Fs- LASIK. The predictability of corneal changes is better following Fs-LASIK.

Purpose To compare changes in astigmatism by refraction and total corneal astigmatism after tPRK, LASIK and FsLASIK. Setting Specialty Eye Hospital Svjetlost, Zagreb, Croatia. Design Partially masked, semi-randomized, prospective, case-by-case, interventional, clinical study. Methods Patients with a stable refraction (-0.75DS to −8.00DS, astigmatism ≤1.00DC) underwent tPRK, LASIK or FsLASIK without complication. Astigmatism was measured at both corneal surfaces over the central 3.2 mm zone (approximately using Pentacam HRTM) preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. Pentacam and refraction data were subjected to vector analysis to calculate the surgically induced changes in i) total corneal astigmatism (SIATCA) ii) any astigmatism by refraction (SIAR) and the vectorial difference (DV) between SIATCA and SIAR. Results Reporting key findings (p TCA and SIAR powers after tPRK (75eyes) but not after LASIK (100eyes) or FsLASIK (100eyes). Mean (±sd,95% CIs) values for DV powers were, tPRK −1.13DC(±0.71, −1.29 to −0.97), LASIK −0.39DC(±0.23,-0.44 to −0.34), FsLASIK −0.55DC(±0.38,-0.62 to −0.47). The differences were significant. For the tPRK and FsLASIK cases, linear regression revealed significant associations between I) SIATCA (x) &DV (z) powers (tPRK z = 1.586x-0.179, r = 0.767, p TCA (x1) &DV (z1) axes (tPRK, z1 = 0.523 × 1 + 0.394, r = .650,p 1 = 0.460 × 1-0.308, r = .465,p Conclusions tPRK is more prone to unintended changes in astigmatism. The difference between SIATCA & SIAR after tPRK or FsLASIK is mediated by SIATCA. Photoablating deeper regions of the cornea reduces the gap between SIATCA & SIAR.

Purpose: To compare predicted and measured changes in astigmatism at the posterior corneal surface (PCS) after FsLASIK or LASIK. Methods: Astigmatism was measured at both corneal surfaces (PentacamTM) before and 3 months after unremarkable FFsLASIK (roup 1, n = 100) or LLASIK (roup 2, n = 100) for myopia (−7.25DS to −0.75DS) and low astigmatism (≤1.00DC). Photoablation was achieved using Schwind Amaris750STM laser (Aberration Free profile, centered on corneal vertex). Pre-and postop astigmatic data, according to subjective refraction and estimates for the corneal surfaces (over the central 3.2 mm zone), were subjected to vector analysis to calculate surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) by refraction (SIAR), at the anterior (SIAFact) and posterior corneal surfaces (SIABact). The difference vector between SIAR and SIAFact was regarded as the predicted SIA at the PCS (SIABest). Results: Reporting key findings. Mean(±sd, 95%CI) SIABest and SIABact powers in group 1 were −0.52DC(±0.35, -0.56 to −0.45) and −0.11DC(±0.08, -0.13 to −0.10) in group 1, −0.35DC(0.20, -0.39 to −0.32) and −0.08DC(0.07, -0.09 to −0.06) in group 2. Differences between SIABest and SIABact were significant for powers but not axes. Significant correlations(p < .01) were revealed between (I) SIAR and SIAFact powers [Group 1, SIAR = 0.370.SIAFact-0.292, r = 0.299. Group 2, SIAR = 0.484.SIAFact-0.394, r = 0.519] but not the axes and (II) ΔC (difference between pre-[x1] and postop measured PCS astigmatic powers) and x1 [Group 1, ΔC = 0.384x1 + 0.119, r = 0.423. Group 2, ΔC = 0.135x1 + 0.047, r = 0.229, p = .022]. There was no correlation between SIABest and SIABact powers or axes. Conclusion: The changes in posterior corneal astigmatic powers according to Pentacam measurements are small and do not account for the deficit between SIAR and SIAFact after FsLASIK or LASIK.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes including patient-reported outcome measures in a sample of eyes undergoing bilateral cataract surgery with implantation of a new model of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens (IOL). METHODS: This non-randomized prospective case series enrolled 206 eyes of 103 patients undergoing phacoemulsification cataract surgery with bilateral implantation of the TECNIS Synergy IOL (Johnson & Johnson Vision). High and low contrast visual acuity, refractive, defocus curve, and patient-reported visual performance (Catquest-9SF questionnaire) outcomes were evaluated during a 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 96.1% (99 of 103) and 91.3% (94 of 103) of patients achieved binocular postoperative uncorrected distance (UDVA) and near visual acuity (UNVA) of 0.00 logMAR (20/20), respectively. Mean postoperative mesopic UNVA for both eyes was 0.14 ± 0.03 logMAR. Likewise, mean binocular UDVA and UNVA were 0.00 ± 0.03 and 0.04 ± 0.02 logMAR. An almost flat mean defocus curve was obtained, with visual acuities between 0.00 and 0.10 logMAR for most defocus levels in both eyes. A reduction of contrast led to a limited but statistically significant change in UNVA in both eyes ( P < .001). The Rasch calibrated scoring of item 2 and the Rasch calibrated mean score of the Catquest-9SF questionnaire increased significantly with surgery ( P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This new presbyopia-correcting IOL provides a continuous range of functional focus, with a limited deterioration under mesopic conditions, which is perceived as a satisfactory outcome by the patient if proper patient selection is performed. [ J Refract Surg . 2021;37(4):256–262.]

Purpose: To determine if the manifest sphero-cylindrical residual refractive error, at various time points over a 12-month postop period after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) was associated with patient age at time of surgery. Methods: Patients with moderate to high hyperopia (3.00–7.00 DS) and astigmatism ⩽2 DC underwent LASIK using Wavelight Allegretto Eye Q (400 Hz). Treatments were centered on corneal vertex, flaps were made with Moria M2 mechanical microkeratome. Pre-and postoperative uncorrected and corrected distant visual acuity, best corrected spherical equivalent (SEQ) were measured. Measurements were taken at 1 week, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the surgery. Target refraction was emmetropia. Total of 161 patients were treated. In binocular cases, data from the right eyes were included for analysis. In this article, we report on refraction data only. Raw data were subjected to several permutations to elicit any links between refractive outcomes and patient age. Results: The key findings were as follows y = postop SEQ (diopters), x = patient age (years), ln( x) = natural logarithm of patient age: At 1 month, y = x[0.049 −0.011.ln( x)] ( R = −0.205, p = 0.001, n = 161). At 3 months, y = x[0.077 −0.017.ln( x)] ( R = −0.355, p 0.05). Conclusion: Residual postop refractive error after LASIK for hyperopia has a logarithmic association with patient age at time of surgery. In younger patients there is tendency toward undercorrection, the opposite occurs in older patients and this persists 1 year after treatment.

Introduction: Keratoconus (KCN) is known to affect all ethnicities but its incidence exhibits geographical variability plausibly due to subclinical forms of the disease, differences in diagnostic methods and criteria, or differences in genetic variations in populations. Aim: To examine the prevalence of keratoconus among the refractive surgery population of Vojvodina, who underwent refractive surgery screening at Eye Clinic Svjetlost Novi Sad, Serbia from September 2018 to September 2019. This is a single-center study. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 876 patients who presented for refractive surgery evaluation. Corneal tomographers represent the gold standard in the detection and classification of corneal ectatic diseases and screening is an essential part of the preoperative diagnostics before any refractive surgery. The corneal tomographer used in this study was a Scheimpflug imaging device (Pentacam AXL, Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). The device was realigned before each measurement. Results: Out of a total number of patients, 619 (70,7%) were candidates for corneal refractive surgery procedure, and 257 patients (29.3%) were not. Out of 257 patients that were not candidates for the procedure 157 (61,0%) patients had thin corneas, high myopia/hypermetropia or had some retinal disease; 75 patients (29,1) were keratoconus suspect and 25 patients (9,7%) had keratoconus. KCN patients had a mean age of 29.5 ± 7.7 years, 18 patients (72.0%) were male and 7 patients were female (28%). Conclusion: The most cited annual incidence of KCN is 2 approximately 1 per 2,000. Recent data from the biggest Netherland study revealed many different epidemiological results which deprive keratoconus of the community of rare diseases. The incidence of keratoconus in Vojvodina refractive surgery population presented in our Clinic was 2.9%.

Introduction: In the field of ophthalmology, laser technology is used in many basic and clinical disciplines and specialities. It has played an important role in promoting the development of ophthalmology. Aim: This article is designed to review the evolution of laser technology in refractive surgeries in ophthalmology, mainly focusing on the characteristics of the excimer laser applied in corneal refractive surgery. Methods: This article was performed based on a literature review and Internet search through scientific databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Result: The literature on excimer laser technology addresses the technical and physical aspects of excimer lasers including types, characteristics and commercially available lasers on the market. Conclusion: The conclusion on this forum aims to help understand the benefits of excimer laser use in ophthalmology, with focus on correction of refractive errors

Introduction T Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (T-PRK) and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (Fs-LASIK) are reftactive surgery methods for treating myopia and myopic astigmatism. Although T-PRK obtains similar results to Fs-LASIK with spherical myopia, it has differences in astigmatism correction. Vector analysis is a perfect tool to see the real difference between these two methods regarding astigmatic refraction and visual acuity. Aim The aim of the study is to investigate changes in astigmatism and visual acuity following treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism above -5.00DS and up to -2.00DC after either T-PRK or Fs-LASIK. Methods Patients (30 eyes per group) underwent unremarkable T-PRK (group I) or Fs-LASIK (group II) using Schwind Amaris 750S laser. Astigmatic data acquired by subjective refraction were subjected to vector analysis to determine the association between surgically (SIA) and target induced (TIA) astigmatic powers and differences in axes(θ). Results Key results at 6 months were: i) Mean astigmatism changed from -0.92 DC (sd ±0.49,95%CI-1.10to-0.75) to -0.38 DC (sd ±0.40,95% CI-0.52 to -0.24) in group I and -0.93DC (sd±0.55,95%CI -1.07 to -0.67) to -0.14DC (sd±0.31,95% CI-0.25 to -0.03) in group II (P=0.005 at 6 months). ii) Mean (±sd) θ was +9.7° (±19.0°) in group I and -2.2° (±15.5°) in group II (P=0.005). Conclusion There was a greater mismatch between SIA and TIA powers and axes after T-PRK. T-PRK tends to induce more unwanted astigmatism. The predictability of the refractive and optical changes is better following Fs-LASIK.

Introduction: The WaveLight Allegretto Eye-Q is a flying-spot excimer laser, with a pulse repetition rate of 400Hz, with two galvanometric scanners for positioning laser pulses. The system has an infrared high speed camera operating at 400Hz to track the patient’s eye movements that either compensates for changes in eye position or interrupts the treatment if the eye moves outside a preset predetermined range. Aim: The purpose of this study was to investigate WaveLight Allegretto Eye-Q 400Hz laser delivery platform aimed to correct astigmatism by subjecting the pre and postoperative astigmatic values to vector analysis. Methods: Patients were divided into two groups, depending on the type of astigmatism. Astigmatism was between 2 and 7 diopters (D). A total of 188 eyes (110 patients), 127 eyes (71 patients) with myopic astigmatism and 61 eyes (39 patients) with mixed astigmatism underwent unremarkable LASIK correction on WaveLight Allegretto Eye-Q 400Hz. The preoperative and postoperative sphere, negative cylinder [C] and axis (ø) of manifest refractions were subjected to vector analysis by calculations of the standard J0 (cos [4π(ø-90)/360]xC/2) and J45 (sin[4π(ø-90)/ 360]xC/2). Results: Reporting the key results, we found that J0 significantly reduced after LASIK (p

Aim: To evaluate safety and efficacy of Laser in situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) procedure for the correction of high hypermetropia. Methods: Retrospective study of 160 patients (266 eyes) who underwent LASIK procedure for the correction of hypermetropia between +3.00 and +7.00 diopters(D) and cylinder up to 2.00D from January 2013 and August 2015. All ablations were performed with Wavelight Allegretto Eye-Q400Hzexcimer laser (Alcon, Forth Worth, TX, USA) with aberration free module and were centered on a corneal vertex. All flaps were made with Moria M2 (Moria, Antony, France) mechanical microkeratome (90μm head). Preoperative and postoperative uncorrected and corrected distant visual acuity (UDVA, CDVA), spherical equivalent (SE) and a berrometry for 5mm pupil were measured. Measurements were taken at 1 week, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the surgery. Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test was used for statistical analysis. Results: Postoperative UDVA was lower than preoperative CDVA at 1 week(p=0.001), at 1 month there was no difference (p=0.099), and at 3, 6 and 12 months UDVA was better (p

Background The creation of corneal flap is considered to be the most critical part of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery. Currently, flaps can be created with mechanical micorkeratomes or femtosecond lasers. Objective To analyze and compare flap characteristics created with two different methods for flap creation in Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Methods This was a retrospective study. The thickness and morphology of the flap were compared between the two mechanical microkeratomes (group I - Moria M2, group II - Moria SBK One Use Plus) and femtosecond laser (group III - Ziemer Femto LDV). Central flap thickness was measured intraoperatively, while the flap profile was measured with anterior optical coherence tomography at two axes (90° and 180°) and 5 measuring points on the first day, the first week, and one month after the surgery. Results Central flap thickness was 110.91±15.79 micrometers (µm) (80-164 µm) in group I, 98.08±13.33 µm (65-136 µm) in group II and 103.52±13.89 µm (66-138 µm) in group III. Anterior optical coherence tomography revealed a meniscus-shaped flap in all three groups at both axes (90° and 180°). The least variability in flap thickness was observed in group III (±6 µm). Conclusion All three methods of flap creation provide good shape and thickness reproducibility. Ziemer Femto LDV femtosecond laser had the least variable flap thickness in a single flap. Mechanical microkeratomes had slightly lower performance.

Purpose: To report the incidence of postoperative ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Methods: A retrospective case review of 30, 167 eyes (16, 732 patients) was conducted following LASIK between August 2007 and August 2015. The follow-up was between 2 and 8 years. Tomography was performed after 2 years postop. After identifying cases of ectasia, the charts of these patients were examined to identify any common factors that may have predisposed them to develop ectasia. Results: Ten eyes of seven patients developed post-LASIK ectasia. Eight eyes had been treated for myopia and myopic astigmatism, two eyes for mixed astigmatism. There were no cases of ectasia after LASIK for hyperopia. All 10 cases of ectasia had a flap that was created using the Moria M2 mechanical microkeratome (average flap thickness 118.15 ± 12.88 µm) and refractive error corrected using the Wavelight Allegretto excimer laser. Retrospectively, most prevalent risk factors were thin cornea (≤ 500 µm, 50% of cases), anterior topographic map irregularities (e.g., asymmetric bow tie, 40% of cases), Ectasia Risk Score > 3 (40% of cases), percent tissue thickness alteration ≥ 40% (20% of cases) and low residual stromal bed (≤ 300 µm, 30% of cases). One eye had no identifiable risk factors. In the retrospective chart review 14.97% (4, 506) of all the eyes had similar risk factors to the cases that went on to develop ectasia. Conclusion: The incidence of ectasia was 0.033% over 8 years. The incidence could be higher as some cases may destabilize beyond this period and some patients were lost to follow-up asymptomatic of any clinical signs. Other intrinsic factors may trigger the development of post LASIK ectasia. The current widely accepted risk factors are not sufficiently rigorous for screening out potential ectasia from developing after LASIK. There is a need to augment accuracy with higher sensitivity and specificity.

Significance Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) is advanced as the most minimally invasive and least traumatic corneal procedure for correcting refractive errors using a single laser. Although SMILE obtains similar results to femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with spherical myopia, it has deficiencies in astigmatism correction. Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare refractive outcomes and high-order aberrations (HOAs) between SMILE and femtosecond LASIK corneal procedures at 1 year post-operative. Methods Ninety-two patients (181 eyes) with myopia/myopic astigmatism underwent either SMILE (group 1) or femtosecond LASIK (group 2). The refractive target was to achieve emmetropia in all cases. Data were analyzed to determine significance of change in refraction and HOAs. Furthermore, astigmatism was subjected to vector analysis using the Thibos (calculation of change, Δ, in J0 and J45 values) and Alpins (calculation of difference, ΔC, between target-induced astigmatism [TIA] and surgically induced astigmatism) methods. Results Forty-five patients (89 eyes) from group 1 and 47 patients (92 eyes) from group 2 completed the study. The main significant (P ≤ .001) findings were as follows: (a) residual astigmatism was greater in group 1; (b) group 1, ΔJ0 = 1.015J0 + 0.040 (R = 0.861), ΔJ45 = 1.082J45 + 0.019 (R = 0.792), ΔC = 0.401TIA + 0.323 (R = 0.489), and mean spherical aberration increased from -0.003 (SD, ±0.059; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.015 to 0.009) to 0.028 μm (SD, ±0.041; 95% CI, -0.037 to -0.020); and (c) group 2, ΔJ0 = 0.952J0 - 0.005 (R = 0.921), ΔJ45 = 0.962J45 - 0.002 (R = 0.923), ΔC = 0.187TIA + 0.101 (R = 0.272), mean coma reduced from 0.114 (SD, ±0.087; 95% CI, 0.096 to 0.132) to 0.077 μm (SD, ±0.059; 95% CI, 0.065 to 0.089), and trefoil from 0.089 (SD, ±0.049; 95% CI, 0.079 to 0.0990) to 0.056 μm (SD, ±0.047; 95% CI, 0.046 to 0.066). Conclusions In comparison with SMILE, femtosecond LASIK offered better precision in the overall control of astigmatism and HOAs.

PURPOSE: To calculate the surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) following LASIK and identify any association between SIA and the target induced astigmatism (TIA) at 1 year postoperatively. METHODS: The SIA was calculated using the TIA and residual astigmatism values for [A] myopic astigmatism and [B] mixed astigmatism treated with either the [I] WaveLight Allegretto EyeQ 400-Hz (Alcon Laboratories, Inc. Fort Worth, TX) or [II] Schwind Amaris 750S (Schwind eye-tech-solutions, Kleinostheim, Germany) platforms. The TIA and corresponding SIA results were analyzed using various techniques. RESULTS: Key findings were the negative SIA power (y 1 ) was significantly correlated with negative TIA power (x 1 ) and sine of the TIA axis (x 2 ) as follows: [A] I, y 1 = 0.829x 1 –0.403x 2 –0.325 ( F = 87.76, r = 0.804, P < .001, n = 127); II, y 1 = 0.891x 1 –0.037x 2 –0.192 ( F = 240.06, r = 0.901, P < .001, n = 119) and [B] I, y 1 = 1.063x 1 +0.233x 2 +0.411 ( F = 990.99, r = 0.881, P < .001, n = 61); II, y 1 = 1.029x 1 –0.115x 2 +0.322 ( F = 270.12, r = 0.908, P < 0.001, n = 111). The sine of negative SIA axis (y 2 ) was significantly correlated with negative TIA power (x 1 ) and TIA axis (x 2 ) as follows: [A] I, y 2 = 0.951x 2 –0.007x 1 +0.008 ( F = 446.58, r = 0.950, P < .001, n = 127); II, y 2 = 0.856x 2 +0.007x 1 +0.105 ( F = 277.18, r = 0.912, P < .001, n = 119) and [B] I, y 2 = 0.953x 2 +0.009x 1 +0.075 ( F = 362.6, r = 0.963, P < .001, n = 61); II, y 2 = 0.977x 2 –0.004x 1 +0.002 ( F = 2910.9, r = 0.990, P < .001, n = 111). CONCLUSIONS: The predicted SIA power was up to 12% less than expected in cases of −6.00 diopters cylinder treated for myopic astigmatism using the Allegretto platform. The mean predicted angle of error (the angle between the SIA and TIA axes) was less than 4°, increasing to 12° for against-the-rule astigmatism. The Allegretto platform tended toward a clockwise axis rotational error, whereas the Amaris platform tended toward the opposite. [ J Refract Surg. 2017;33(2):104–109.]

One of the most widely performed surgical procedures nowadays is cataract surgery combined with monofocal intraocular lens implantation (IOL). Monofocal IOLs are able to compensate for the spherical refractive error but not astigmatism. Thus, patients with astigmatism are unable to see well after surgery without spectacles. New generation of IOLs, called toric IOLs, improve uncorrected visual acuity in eyes with high astigmatism due to a specific lens design. The amount and the axis of astigmatism in each particular eye is specific; thus, toric IOL has to be produced individually, making cataract surgery in patients with astigmatism a personalized one. Additional problem with monofocal IOLs in all cataract cases (including those with astigmatism) is presbyopia. With monofocal lenses, only the distance vision is fully corrected and every patient has to wear spectacles for near vision. Optical design of IOLs with more foci, so-called multifocal IOLs, enables patients to see well both at a distance and near. When first models of toric bifocal and trifocal IOLs were invented, combined refractive errors (myopia, hyperopia, or presbyopia with astigmatism) could also be successfully corrected. Toric multifocal IOLs are again produced as personalized lens since the amount and angle of astigmatism is different in each eye. A truly exciting new era has started in the field of ophthalmology, enabling the surgeon to provide patients with specific needs with an intraocular lens produced specifically for them and thus to fully correct patient vision at all distances.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate visual and refractive outcomes after Veriflex phakic intraocular lenses (pIOL) implantation in moderately myopic eyes as well as postoperative complications. Methods: This prospective clinical study included 40 eyes of 26 patients which underwent implantation of Veriflex for correction of myopia from -6.00 to -14.50 diopters (D) in the Eye Clinic Svjetlost Sarajevo, from January 2011 to January 2014. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), manifest residual spherical equivalent (MRSE), intraocular pressure (IOP), endothelial cell (EC) density were evaluated at one, three, six and 12 months. Other complications in postoperative period were evaluated. For statistical analysis SPSS for Windows and Microsoft Excel were used. Results: Out of 26 patients 14 had binocular and 12 monocular procedure, with mean age of 29.8±6.5 years. After 12 months mean UDVA was 0.73±0.20. Mean MRSE was -0.39±0.31D and 90% of eyes had MRSE within ±1D. EC loss was 7.18±4.33%. There was no significant change of IOP by the end of 12 months follow up period. The only intraoperative complication was hyphema and occurred in one eye. Few postoperative complications were: subclinical inflammation in three eyes (7, 5%), pigment dispersion in four eyes (10%), ovalisation of papilla in 2 eyes (5%) and decentration of pIOL in 2 eyes (5%). Conclusion: Implantation of iris-claw phakic lenses Veriflex for treating moderately high myopia is a procedure with good visual and refractive results and few postoperative complications.

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of astigmatic laser in- situ keratomileusis (LASIK) procedures between two different platforms using J0 and J45 vector analysis. METHODS: Patients were divided into four groups, depending on the type of astigmatism and laser platform on which they were treated. Astigmatism was between 2 and 7 diopters (D). One hundred and thirty-five patients with myopic astigmatism (246 eyes) and 102 patients with mixed astigmatism (172 eyes) underwent unremarkable LASIK correction on Wavelight Allegretto Eye-Q 400Hz and Schwind Amaris 750S laser platform. The preoperative and postoperative sphere, negative cylinder [C] and axis (ø) of manifest refractions were subjected to vector analysis by calculations of the standard J0 (cos [4π(ø-90)/360]xC/2) and J45 (sin[4π(ø-90)/360]xC/2). RESULTS: Reporting the key results, we found J0 significantly reduced after LASIK in both groups (p

Objective: To evaluate the effect of an aspheric LASIK refractive enhancement performed by relifting the original flap on the higher order aberrations (HOA) of the eye and the relationship between central corneal thickness (CCT) and intra-ocular pressure (IOP). Methods: Consecutive case series of 30 eyes requiring refractive enhancement from 1804 uncomplicated primary LASIK procedures performed in 2012. Flap relift and wavefront optimized ablation (Wavelight Allegretto Eye Q 400 Hz excimer laser) were performed in all cases. Pre-and post-operative examination included Shack-Hartmann aberrometry for 3 mm and 5 mm pupil sizes, CCT and IOP. Postoperative results at 1 year were compared to baseline values. Results: Changes in average values of coma, spherical aberration (SA), trefoil, CCT and IOP were not significant. Linear regression revealed significant associations between change (y) in trefoil and pre-enhancement value of trefoil for 3 mm pupil (0.828x-0.045, r=0.722, p

Objective: Corneal grafts have a major risk of fungal keratitis due to long-term local and sometimes systemic steroid/antibiotic use. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of intrastromal voriconazole as a therapeutic adjunctive for the management of fungal keratitis in corneal graft. Design: Presentation of two cases of fungal keratitis occurring after corneal transplantation and treated at the University Eye Hospital “Svjetlost”. Participants and Methods: Two cases of postkeratoplasty fungal keratitis are presented in the study. Both patients had decreased visual acuity, eye redness and severe pain occurring at 10 and 12 months after uneventful corneal transplantation. They were still receiving steroid/antibiotic topical treatment to protect their corneal graft. Patients presented with a stromal infiltrate in a donor tissue, accompanied with corneal ulcer at recipient/donor junction. Candida infection was proven by corneal scraping. Topical and systemic antimycotic treatment was started, fortified by intrastromal injection of voriconazole (50 μg/0.1 ml) given all around the junction of clear cornea and infiltrate (or ulcer). Results: One week after injection, corneal ulcers had healed and corneal infiltrates decreased; resulting in visual acuity improvement from 20/100 to 20/20 in first, and from 20/80 to 20/40 in a second case. One year after infection visual acuity in the first case remained 20/20, and improved to 20/20 in a second case. Conclusion: Intrastromal voriconazole seems to be a safe method for providing a higher concentration of the drug in the cornea affected by fungal keratitis; it can serve as an adjunctive treatment to topical and systemic antifungal therapy.

Purpose To compare functional outcomes of Wavelight Allegretto Eye-Q 400Hz and Schwind Amaris 750S excimer laser for astigmatism between 2 and 7 diopters(D). Methods Prospective comparative non-randomized case series of 480 eyes assigned in two laser groups and further divided into myopic and mixed astigmatism subgroups. All treatments were centered on corneal vertex. One-year results were compared between the groups. Statistical analysis was performed using z-test. Results Both Allegretto and Amaris postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) improved in comparison to preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). The difference was significant in the Allegretto group for myopic astigmatism (p = 0.017). There was no difference in postoperative UDVA between lasers. Average sphere decreased in all groups for both lasers (p