Search

Background Intra-articular injections for the treatment of knee pain due to osteoarthritis are performed when conservative therapies have failed. The intra-articular injection of lidocaine may be an effective treatment modality due to its neuronal membrane-stabilizing effect and long-lasting anti-inflammatory action. In this study, we compared the efficacy of intra-articular 0.5% lidocaine versus saline injection on pain, stiffness and physical function in patients with osteoarthritis. Methods Patients with osteoarthritis were randomly allocated to two groups. Group I (n = 26) received 7 mL 0.5% lidocaine and group II (n = 26) received 7 mL saline into the painful knee for a series of three injections spaced by 1 week intervals under ultrasound guidance. Knee pain was measured with a numeric rating score (NRS) at baseline and 3 months after the 3rd injection. WOMAC scales, including pain (WOMAC-P), stiffness (WOMAC-S) and physical function (WOMAC-F), were assessed and recorded at baseline, 30 minutes after the 1st injection, immediately prior to the 2nd and 3rd injections and 3 months after the 3rd injection. Results Demographic data were comparable between groups. The NRS after 3 months was significantly lower in group I (P = 0.001). The WOMAC-P, immediately prior to the 3rd injection and 3 months afterwards, was significantly lower in group I (P = 0.006, P = 0.001, respectively). The WOMAC-S was improved prior to the 3rd injection and sustained until 3 months in group I (P = 0.035, P = 0.004, respectively). The WOMAC-F was improved after the 1st injection and sustained until 3 months in group I (P = 0.002, P Conclusions Intra-articular 0.5% lidocaine injection under ultrasound guidance has a potential role in the management of chronic knee pain due to osteoarthritis for a 3-month period.

Objective: To assess flexible laryngeal mask airway (F-LMA) use during pediatric adenoidectomies in terms of patient safety, comfort, complication rates and surgeon satisfaction levels. Methods: Patients who had undergone an elective adenoidectomy after receiving general anesthesia using F-LMA from June 2012 to November 2015 were included. Patients' demographics and the incidence of perioperative complications were investigated. The surgeon's satisfaction level was also evaluated by questionnaire. Results: Eight hundred fourteen patient were included in the study. Conversion from F-LMA to an endotracheal tube was carried out in two patients (0.2%). Airway complications were identified in two patients. The mean duration of stay in the postoperative anesthesia care unit was 17 minutes. All patients were discharged the same day. According to the otolaryngologists F-LMA applications provide a significant reduction in the processing time (100%), postoperative patient comfort is better than when using endotracheal intubation (83.3%) and the consensus was that there should be a complete continuation of the use of the F-LMA (100%) in subsequent adenoidectomies. Conclusion: Our data show that the use of F-LMA for pediatric adenoidectomies has well tolerability profile and resulted in a lower incidence of complications. We think that the use of F-LMA for pediatric adenoidectomy is safer, simpler and speeder method.

This study evaluated the postoperative analgesic efficacies of fascia iliaca block and periarticular drug injection techniques after TKA (total knee arthroplasty) surgeries.Prospective, randomized clinical trial.University Teaching and Research Center.Seventy-one American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-III patients between 48 and 70 years of age who underwent total knee arthroplasty were randomized.Tenoxicam (20 mg) was administered intramuscularly to both groups of patients 30 minutes before surgery. Patients were randomized into two groups to receive fascia iliaca block before the induction of anesthesia (Group FI) or periarticular drug injection during the surgery (Group PI). All surgeries were performed under general anesthesia using standard techniques. Postoperative analgesia was provided with patient-controlled intravenous morphine.Total morphine consumption was the primary outcome measure and was recorded postoperatively at 1, 2, 6, 12 and 24 hours. Pain levels at rest and on movement (knee flexion) were evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and recorded at the same time points. Patients' demographics, rescue analgesic demands, side effects, hemodynamics, and satisfaction scores were also recorded.The groups had similar VAS scores both at rest and on movement (P.05). However, the amount of cumulative morphine and use at each follow-up period was higher in Group PI (P.0001). The groups did not differ significantly in rescue analgesic use or side effects, such as nausea/vomiting, hemodynamic variables, and patient satisfaction scores (P.05).Fascia iliaca block may be used as an alternative method to periarticular injection, and it effectively reduces the amount of morphine used to relieve post-TKA pain.

Background and Objective: Septoplasty operations are associated with moderate to severe postoperative pain which has unfavourable effects on patient's recovery and postoperative outcome. The aim of this study was to compare effects of intravenous paracetamol and dexketoprofen on postoperative analgesia, tramadol consumption and side effects after septoplasty. Methods: In total 72 patients (aged 18-65 years) who had undergone an elective septoplasty from August 2013 to January 2015 in Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, in the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation Clinics were included in this study. The patients were randomised into one of two groups: those who received intravenous paracetamol; and those who received intravenous dexketoprofen. All patients were treated with tramadol for 24 hour postoperatively. The primary endpoint was pain intensity as measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS). Tramadol consumption and drug related side effects were also recorded. Results: The pain scores in the dexketoprofen group were significantly lower at recovery, 15 and 30 minutes and two hour (p< 0.05). The pain scores had no difference at other time points. Tramadol consumption in the recovery period was significantly lower in the dexketoprofen group, but cumulative tramadol consumption did not differ between the groups. The incidence of nausea was lower but not statistically significant in the dexketoprofen group at 15 and 30 minutes and two hour. Conclusions: Compared with paracetamol, preemptive dexketoprofen is associated with lower VAS scores and tramadol consumption in the early postoperative period after septoplasty. However, the cumulative tramadol consumption did not significantly differ between the groups.

ResumoJustificativa e objetivoA sedação em paciente dependente de diálise com doença renal em estágio terminal (DRET) requer cautela como resultado da administração de altas doses de sedativos e suas complicações. Os regimes de sedação com múltiplas drogas podem ser superiores e vantajosos em relação ao consumo menor de drogas e aos eventos adversos que ocorrem facilmente em pacientes com DEET. Avaliamos os efeitos da pré‐medicação com dexmedetomidina sobre o consumo de propofol, os níveis de sedação com os escores da Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation (OAA/S) e do índice bispectral (BIS), as alterações hemodinâmicas e os potenciais efeitos colaterais em pacientes geriátricos com DRET submetidos à cirurgia para fratura de quadril sob raquianestesia.MétodoNeste estudo randômico, controlado e duplo‐cego, 60 pacientes idosos (idade≥65 anos), com DRET e fratura de quadril, agendados para fixação intramedular de haste femoral anterógrada foram designados para grupos para receberam infusão intravenosa de solução salina (Grupo C) ou pré‐medicação com infusão de 0,5mg kg/10min de dexmedetomidina (DEX) (Grupo D). Todos os pacientes receberam infusão de propofol após a indução da raquianestesia.ResultadosO consumo total de propofol, a dose de propofol necessária para os níveis‐alvo de sedação de acordo com os escores da OAA/S, os valores do BIS e os tempos de recuperação foram significativamente menores no Grupo D (p

Patients with isolated peripheral branch neuralgia of trigeminal nerve usually receive traditional treatment such as medical therapy and interventional procedures targeting the entire trigeminal nerve or related ganglions. However, if the intractable pain is limited to a certain branch, the patient may also benefit from a peripheral and nerve-targeted interventional approach. Here, we report the management of a patient with isolated infraorbital neuralgia by ultrasound-guided infraorbital nerve block with steroid and local anesthetic combination. 48years-old male patient diagnosed with trigeminal neuralgia was resistant to medical therapy for 3years. The pain site was isolated to the area of the right nasal wing, right lateral incisor, the upper right canine and the first premolar teeth. His pain was an electric shock-like, throbbing and stabbing with a pain score of 8-9 according to numeric rating scale (NRS) and 18 according to the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs Pain Scale (LANSS). Following a diagnostic ultrasound-guided infraorbital nerve block with 1% lidocaine, the block was repeated twice with 15mg lidocaine and 1.5mg dexamethasone in a total volume of 1.5mL in a month. The patient's NRS and LANSS scores decreased to 2 and 8, for approximately 21months until this report was written. We suggest that ultrasound-guided infraorbital nerve block with dexamethasone and lidocaine combination may present as an initial interventional treatment option in patients with isolated infraorbital neuralgia.

OBJECTIVE Adequate pain management following day-case surgery allows early ambulation of patients. In this study, we aimed to compare postoperative analgesic efficacy of intravenous (iv) dexketoprofen vs. iv paracetamol following day-case operative hysteroscopy. METHODS One hundred and fourteen American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II patients scheduled for day-case operative hysteroscopy were recruited and randomized to three groups in the study. Group D received 50 mg iv dexketoprofen trometamol, Group P 1000 mg iv paracetamol and Group C normal saline solution. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain intensity, pain relief, sedation, nausea-vomiting, other side effects, and additional opioid analgesic requirement were noted at postoperative 15 minutes (min), 30 min, 1 hour (h), 2 h, and 3 h. Patients with VAS>=40 mm received meperidine 0.25 mg/kg as rescue analgesic medication. RESULTS VAS scores at 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, and 2 h were significantly lower in Group D compared to Group C. VAS scores at 15 min and 30 min were significantly lower in Group D compared to Group P. The percentages of patients who required opioid treatment were 34%, 60%, and 63% in Groups D, P and C, respectively (p

Dear Editor, Edwards’ syndrome is the most common autosomal trisomy after Down syndrome (1). It is a syndrome in which multiple malformations such as structural heart defects, microcephaly, micrognathia, low-set ears, limbs, gastrointestinal and genitourinary system defects are observed (1). Death often occurs in the first year of life because of reasons such as severe heart defects, central apnoea, aspiration, respiratory failure and upper airway obstruction, found in more than 90% of patients (1, 2). Both serious heart problems and the possibility of a difficult airway due to micrognatia makes anaesthetic management special for patients to undergo surgery. There are few reports in the literature regarding the anaesthetic management of these patients. A 2-month-old baby boy weighing 3030 g was evaluated for intervention because of a right inguinal hernia. It was found out that he had perimembraneous outlet ventricular septal defect (VSD), atrial septal defect (ASD), patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), tricuspid valve malformation, pulmonary hypertension, horseshoe kidney and, in the cranial system, ventriculomegaly and mega cisterna magna. Physical examination revealed that the baby with microphthalmia, micrognathia, short neck and ‘club foot’ deformity in lower extremities was low-weighted and apathetic (Figure 1). Findings of laboratory tests were normal. It was decided to place a laryngeal mask without using muscle relaxant in the patient in whom routine monitoring was conducted. Number 1 laryngeal mask was placed on the patient, who received 3 mg kg−1 thiopental sodium and 2%–3% concentration of sevoflurane intravenously in the induction. In the anaesthesia maintenance, 50%/50% oxygen/nitrogen mixture was applied with 1%–2% concentration of sevoflurane. In the patient who remained haemodynamically stable, the intervention was completed smoothly, and no perioperative complications developed. Figure 1 Appearance of the baby with Edwards’ syndrome Edwards’ syndrome is a complex syndrome for anaesthesiologists, with many aspects. In these patients, in whom cardiac malformations are at the forefront, it is important to prepare an anaesthesia plan that will not affect the haemodynamics. Because Edwards’ syndrome may cause muscle rigidity, it is stated that succinylcholine should be avoided in cases where the use of muscle relaxants is required (3). Considering the possibility of difficult intubation that may occur because of micrognathia, we believe that it would be appropriate to use the supraglottic airway tools that require the use of lower doses of anaesthetic drugs in appropriate cases and cause less haemodynamic response.

Study Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sugammadex in reversing profound neuromuscular block induced by rocuronium in infant patients. Design Retrospective observational study. Setting University teaching hospital. Patients Twenty-six infants (2-12 months of age; 3-11 kg) with an American Society of Anesthesiologists classification I, II, or III who were scheduled to undergo neurosurgical procedures were included in the study. Interventions Anesthesia was induced with 5 mg/kg thiopental, 1 μg/kg fentanyl and 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium. Sevoflurane was administered to all patients after intubation. Methods The neuromuscular block was monitored with acceleromyography using train-of-four (TOF) stimuli. Patients received additional doses of rocuronium to maintain a deep block during surgery. If profound neuromuscular block (TOF, 0) persisted at the end of the surgery, 3mg/kg sugammadex was administered. Measurements The demographic data, surgeries, and anesthetic agents were recorded. The time from sugammadex administration to recovery of neuromuscular function (TOF ratio, >0.9) and complications during and after extubation were also recorded. Main results Twenty-six infants who had a deep neuromuscular block (TOF, 0) at the end of surgery received 3 mg/kg sugammadex. The mean recovery time of the T4/T1 ratio of 0.9 was 112 seconds. No clinical evidence of recurarization or residual curarization was observed. Conclusions The efficacy and safety of sugammadex were confirmed in infant surgical patients for reversal of deep neuromuscular block induced by rocuronium.

Objective To evaluate the clinical success rate, safety, and usefulness for intraoperative central venous pressure monitoring, and the intravenous access of the supraclavicular subclavian vein approach when compared with the infraclavicular subclavian vein approach and the internal jugular vein approach for central venous catheterization during open-chest cardiac surgery. Design A prospective, randomized, single-center study. Setting A university hospital. Participants One hundred ninety-five patients scheduled for open-chest cardiac surgery. Interventions The study population consisted of patients for whom central vein catheterization was intended during cardiac surgery. Patients were randomized to 3 groups according to the route of central vein catheterization: the supraclavicular group: the supraclavicular approach for the subclavian vein (n = 65); the infraclavicular group: the infraclavicular approach for the subclavian vein (n = 65); and the jugular group: the internal jugular vein approach (n = 65). After the induction of anesthesia, central venous catheterization was performed according to the assigned approach. Measurements and Main Results The success rates for the assigned approach were 98%, 98%, and 92% for the supraclavicular, infraclavicular, and jugular groups, respectively (p > 0.05). The success rates in the first 3 attempts in patients who were catheterized successfully according to the assigned approach were 96%, 100%, and 96% for the supraclavicular, infraclavicular, and jugular groups, respectively (p > 0.05). There was no difference among groups in catheter insertion time (p > 0.05). After sternal retraction, central venous pressure trace loss and difficulty in fluid infusion were significantly more frequent in the infraclavicular group (21%) when compared with the supraclavicular (3%) and jugular groups (0%) (p = 0.01). There was no difference among groups in terms of catheter malposition, complications during catheterization, and rate of catheter-related infection. Conclusion The supraclavicular approach for subclavian vein catheterization is an acceptable alternative for central venous access during cardiac surgery in terms of procedural success rate, ease of placement, rate of complications, and usability after sternal retractor expansion.

Objective: Tracheostomy is one of the most frequent interventions for ICU patients. The current trend in performing a tracheostomy is a percutaneous approach because of its popularity and significant advantages. In this study, certain indications of surgical tracheostomy (ST) are suggested and furthermore, ST is compared with percutaneous tracheostomy (PT).Patient and Methods: We performed a U-shaped ST in 121 patients and PT in 85 patients between March 2003 and December 2006. All of the STs were opened U-shaped in the operating room. In this technique; instead of removing the tracheal ring, it was used to create a flap. The tracheal flap was hung with a suture from middle of the 2nd or the 3rd cartilage rings, as a guide. Also, the PT procedure “Griggs dilatation technique” was performed in the ICU.Results: PT and ST had similar complication rates: 4.1% for ST [bleeding in 2 patients, stenosis in 2, and stomal infection in 1] versus 3.6% for PT [bleeding in 2 patients, and pneomothorax in 1] (p = 0.08). No significant difference was found regarding mean operation time between ST [12 min (9–18)] and PT [8 min (6–16)] (p = 0.09) Conclusions: Staff utilization and cost seem like the major advantages of PT. However, our surgical technique has similar complication rates with PT and moreover, using ST still remains favorable for select patients with thyroid hyperplasia, short neck, tracheaomalacia, obesity, neck operation history and for children.

We analyzed the results of patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for management of kidney stone disease under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and compared surgical parameters and outcomes with a matched control group who underwent PCNL under general anesthesia.A total of 82 patients were studied in two groups. Group 1 (n = 45) consisted of the patients who underwent general anesthesia, and group 2 (n = 37) comprised those who received combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.The mean ages of patients in groups 1 and 2 were 45 +/- 15 and 44 +/- 15 years, respectively. The mean areas of the stones in groups 1 and 2 were 734 +/- 386 mm(2) and 731 +/- 394 mm(2), respectively. There were no significant differences between groups 1 and 2 among surgical parameters, including age, stone area, operative time, irrigation fluids, fluoroscopy time, delta hemoglobin, and hospitalization time (P = 0.439). At the end of the surgery, stone-free rates were 76% in group 1 and 81% in group 2; clinically insignificant residue fragments rates were 24% in group 1 and 19% in group 2. The difference was statistically insignificant between the groups (P = 0.543).We consider that combined spinal-regional anesthesia is a feasible technique in PCNL operations because the efficacy and safety were not affected. Further investigations with larger series are needed.

in this study we controlled the efficiency and safety of using remifentanil combined with two different supplementary background infusions for labor analgesia in nulliparous patients.60 subjects were allocated to two groups. After programming the patient-controlled analgesia device to deliver a fixed load and demand doses of intravenous remifentanil for all subjects, group r (n = 30) received a background infusion of remifentanil 0.1 microg/kg/min and group R (n = 30) received a supplementary infusion of remifentanil 0.15 microg/kg/min. Visual analogue scale for analgesia, hemodynamic parameters, sedation scales and fetal heart rates were recorded at the 5th, 10th, 20th and 30th min of the study and measurements continued every 15 min during 90 min of labor and delivery. Side effects, Apgar and satisfaction scores were obtained for every subject.visual analogue scale scores of group R were significantly lower than those of group r throughout labor and delivery (p0.05). Hemodynamic parameters and fetal heart rates of the two groups were not different (p0.05). Most subjects were awake and only nausea was obtained (p0.05). The increase in the Apgar and satisfaction scores was not statistically significant (p0.05).it was determined that remifentanil with a 15-mug demand dose and 0.15 mug/kg/min supplementary continuous infusion is an effective choice for patient-controlled analgesia during labor in nulliparous subjects.

The purpose of the paper was to assess and to compare the effectiveness and safety of patient controlled epidural analgesia using tramadol or morphine for postoperative analgesia after major urological surgeries. For patient-controlled epidural analgesia; in group I (n = 30) a loading dose of 20 mg tramadol 0.1% with a continuous infusion of 1 mg/ml at a rate of 8 ml/h was administered preemptly and in group II (n = 30) a loading dose of 2 mg morphine in 20 ml normal saline was administered and a supplemental infusion of 0.2 mg/h morphine was begun at a rate of 2 ml/h. A demand epidural bolus dose of 5 ml with a lockout time of 30 minutes and a background infusion of 8 ml/h in tramadol 0.1% group and 2 ml/h in morphine 0.01% group were administered. VAS for pain intensity, vital signs, sedation scale and side effects were monitored at 0, 15, 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 24 hours during the postoperative period. Adequate analgesia was provided in all patients. VAS values were significantly lower in group II than in group I after the fourth hour measurement (p < 0.05). The incidence of nausea, vomiting and pruritius was lower in the tramadol group (p < 0.05). In conclusion we decided that, after major urologic surgery, patient-controlled epidural administration of tramadol with a continuous background infusion might provide a safe and effective analgesia with limited side effects, even though there is increased drug consumption.

Background and objectives: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are frequently used to control arthroscopic pain. Addition of oral effective opioid “codeine” to NSAIDs may be more effective and decrease parenteral opioid consumption in the postoperative period. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and side effects of naproxen sodium and a new preparation naproxen sodium-codeine phosphate when administered preemptively for arthroscopic meniscectomy. Methods: Sixty-one patients were randomized into two groups to receive either oral naproxen sodium (Group N) or naproxen sodium-codeine phosphate (Group NC) before surgery. The surgery was carried out under general anesthesia. Intravenous meperidine was initiated by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for all patients. The primary outcome measure was pain score at the first postoperative hour assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Sedation assessed by Ramsey Sedation Scale, first demand time of PCA, postoperative meperidine consumption, side effects and hemodynamic data were also recorded. Results: The groups were demographically comparable. Median VAS scores both at rest and on movement were significantly lower in Group NC compared with Group N, except 18th hour on movement (p 0.05). Conclusions: The combination of naproxen sodium-codeine phosphate provided more effective analgesia than naproxen sodium and did not increase side effects. Resumo: Justificativa e objetivos: Os anti-inflamatórios não esteróides (AINEs) são frequentemente usados para controlar a dor após artroscopia. A adição de um opiáceo oral eficaz (codeína) aos AINEs pode ser mais efetiva e diminuir o consumo de opiáceo parenteral no pós-operatório. O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar a eficácia e os efeitos colaterais de naproxeno sódico e uma nova preparação, naproxeno sódico-fosfato de codeína, quando administrados preventivamente para meniscectomia artroscópica. Métodos: Sessenta e um pacientes foram randomicamente divididos em dois grupos para receber naproxeno sódico por via oral (Grupo N) ou naproxeno sódico-fosfato de codeína (Grupo NC) antes da cirurgia. A cirurgia foi realizada sob anestesia geral. Meperidina intravenosa foi iniciada por meio de analgesia controlada pelo paciente (ACP) para todos os pacientes. O desfecho primário foi o escore de dor na primeira hora de pós-operatório, avaliada com a Escala Visual Analógica (EVA). A sedação foi avaliada usando a Escala de Sedação de Ramsey. A primeira demanda de ACP, o consumo de meperidina no pós-operatório, os efeitos colaterais e os dados hemodinâmicos também foram registrados. Resultados: Os grupos foram demograficamente comparáveis. As medianas dos escores EVA tanto em repouso quanto em movimento foram significativamente menores no Grupo NC comparado ao Grupo N; exceto para movimento na avaliação de18 horas (p 0,05). Conclusões: A combinação de naproxeno sódico-fosfato de codeína forneceu analgesia mais efetiva que naproxeno sódico, sem aumentar os efeitos colaterais. Keywords: Arthroscopy, Postoperative analgesia, Naproxen sodium, Codeine phosphate, Palavras-chave: Artroscopia, Analgesia pós-operatória, Naproxeno sódico, Fosfato de codeína

Background A multimodal and preventative approach to providing postoperative analgesia is becoming increasingly popular for children and adults, with the aim of reducing reliance on opioids. We conducted a prospective, randomized double-blind study to compare the analgesic efficacy of intravenous paracetamol and dipyrone in the early postoperative period in school-age children undergoing lower abdominal surgery with spinal anesthesia. Methods Sixty children scheduled for elective lower abdominal surgery under spinal anesthesia were randomized to receive either intravenous paracetamol 15 mg/kg, dipyrone 15 mg/kg or isotonic saline. The primary outcome measure was pain at rest, assessed by means of a visual analog scale 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h and 6 h after surgery. If needed, pethidine 0.25 mg/kg was used as the rescue analgesic. Time to first administration of rescue analgesic, cumulative pethidine requirements, adverse effects and complications were also recorded. Results There were no significant differences in age, sex, weight, height or duration of surgery between the groups. Pain scores were significantly lower in the paracetamol group at 1 h (P = 0.030) and dipyrone group at 2 h (P = 0.010) when compared with placebo. The proportion of patients requiring rescue analgesia was significantly lower in the paracetamol and dipyrone groups than the placebo group (vs. paracetamol P = 0.037; vs. dipyrone P = 0.020). Time to first analgesic requirement appeared shorter in the placebo group but this difference was not statistically significant, nor were there significant differences in pethidine requirements, adverse effects or complications. Conclusion After lower abdominal surgery conducted under spinal anesthesia in children, intravenous paracetamol appears to have similar analgesic properties to intravenous dipyrone, suggesting that it can be used as an alternative in the early postoperative period. Trial registration Clinical Trials.gov. Identifier: NCT01858402.

Background The addition of opioids to local anesthetics contributes to the quality of spinal anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Objective In our prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study, our aim was to compare the effect of low-dose sufentanil plus levobupivacaine or a fentanyl plus levobupivacaine mixture on anesthesia quality, block characteristics, newborn and mother well-being, surgeon satisfaction, and duration of postoperative analgesia. Methods Ninety-three patients were randomized into 3 groups (n = 31). Patients in Group C received 0.5% levobupivacaine (2.2 ± 0.2 mL), Group S received 2.5 µg sufentanil plus 0.5% levobupivacaine (2.2 ± 0.2 mL), and Group F received 10 µg fentanyl plus 0.5% levobupivacaine (2.2 ± 0.2 mL) intrathecally completed to a volume of 3 mL with the addition of saline in all groups. Patients’ demographics, sensory and motor block characteristics, hemodynamics, Apgar scores, umbilical blood gas values, maternal side effects, surgeon satisfaction score, time to first analgesia requirement, and additional analgesic use within 24 hours were recorded. Results In Group S and Group F, target levels of sensory and motor block were achieved more rapidly (P < 0.001). The hemodynamic values were lower (P < 0.05), and the duration of sensory blockade and the time of first analgesic requirement were longer (P < 0.001) in Group S. Additional analgesic requirement during first 24-hour period was lowest in Group S, and highest in Group C (P < 0.001). Apgar scores and umbilical blood gas samples were similar between groups. Postoperative pruritus was more frequent in Group S (P < 0.001) and surgeon satisfaction score was significantly lower in Group C (P = 0.003). Conclusions We suggest that the addition of sufentanil and fentanyl to intrathecal levobupivacaine during caesarean section surgery is more effective than the administration of levobupivacaine alone. The addition of sufentanil to levobupivacaine allowed rapid onset time for sensory and motor block levels. It also extended the duration of postoperative analgesia and led to a decrease in total analgesic requirement. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01858090.

Tonsillectomy is associated with severe postoperative pain for which, several drugs are employed for management. OBJECTIVE: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of intravenous paracetamol and dipyrone when used for post-tonsillectomy analgesia in children. METHOD: 120 children aged 3-6 yr, undergoing tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy and/or ventilation tube insertion were randomized to receive intraoperative infusions of paracetamol (15 mg/kg), dipyrone (15 mg/kg) or placebo (0.9% NaCl). Evaluation was carried out at 0.25, 0.50, 1, 2, 4, 6h postoperatively. Pethidine 0.25 mg/kg was utilized as rescue analgesic. Cumulative pethidine requirement was the primary outcome. Pain intensity measurement, pain relief, sedation level, nausea and vomiting, postoperative bleeding and any other adverse effects were noted. RESULTS: No significant difference was found in pethidine requirement between paracetamol and dipyrone groups. Cumulative pethidine requirement was significantly less in paracetamol and dipyrone groups vs. placebo. No significant difference was observed between groups in postoperative pain intensity scores throughout the study. CONCLUSION: Intravenous paracetamol is found to have a similar analgesic efficacy as intravenous dipyrone and they both help to reduce the opioid requirement for postoperative analgesia in pediatric day-case tonsillectomy.

Objective. Peripheral nerve blocks with methylprednisolone may provide effective pain therapy by decreasing ectopic neuronal discharge and the release of local inflammatory mediators at the site of nerve injury. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of lidocaine alone with a combination of depo-methylprednisolone plus lidocaine in the management of neuropathic pain due to peripheral nerve damage. Design. Randomized, double-blind comparator trial Setting. Group control (N = 44) received 0.5% lidocaine and group methylprednisolone (N = 44) received 80 mg depo-methylprednisolone + 0.5% lidocaine proximal to the site of nerve injury with a total amount of 10–20 mL solution according to the type of peripheral nerve block with nerve stimulator. Outcome Measures. Demographic data, preblock numerical rating scales (NRSs), the Leeds assessment of neuropathic symptoms and signs (LANSS0) score, accompanying symptoms, and analgesic requirements were recorded. Postblock NRS scores were noted following peripheral nerve block and after 3 months. LANSS1, accompanying symptoms, and analgesic requirements were also reevaluated 3 months after the injection. Results. Demographic data, preblock NRS (8 ± 1.5 and 8.1 ± 1.2, respectively), postblock NRS (2.1 ± 1.2 and 2.4 ± 1.4, respectively), LANSS0 (18.4 ± 2.2 and 18.2 ± 2.1, respectively), and accompanying symptoms were comparable between groups. Scores for the methylprednisolone group were significantly improved at 3-month postblock for NRS (2 ± 1.4 vs 5.2 ± 1.7) and LANSS1 scores (4.14 ± 2.7 vs 14.1 ± 2.8), accompanying symptoms, and analgesic requirements (P

To the Editor, We read Dr. Gitkind's report with great interest [1]. Since epidural steroid injection (ESI) is a rational treatment approach for radicular pain due to herniated nucleus pulposus and lumbar stenosis [2], its popularity is rising. It is reported to decrease surgical rates and self-reported pain and disability [3]. Corticosteroids contribute to pain treatment with their ability to decrease inflammation by inhibiting production of prostaglandins and excitation of c-fibers, which is mainly responsible for pain generation. However, ESI is not an option free of side effect due to intervention itself and the drugs used [4]. Here, we describe two patients with abnormal uterine …

Objectives To compare the effects of thoracic epidural anesthesia with levobupivacaine or bupivacaine on block features, intraoperative hemodynamics, and postoperative analgesia for thoracic surgery. Design A prospective, randomized, and double-blind study. Setting A university hospital. Participants Fifty patients undergoing thoracic surgery. Interventions Patients received thoracic epidural catheterization either with levobupivacaine or bupivacaine. A bolus of 0.1 mL/kg of 0.25% levobupivacaine or 0.25% bupivacaine was administered, and infusion of the same drug with 0.25% concentration was started at 0.1 mL/kg/h. General anesthesia was induced after assessing the sensory block and maintained with 0.3% to 0.8% isoflurane and 50% O 2 in air. Epidural patient-controlled analgesia with the same agent was started at the end of the operation for 48 hours postoperatively. Measurements and Main Results Sensory block features such as onset time and spread were assessed for the next 20 minutes after the bolus dose. Heart rate and systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressures were recorded intraoperatively and postoperatively. Pain at rest and activity was evaluated by the visual analog scale (VAS) for 48 hours after the operation. All patients were comparable with respect to the demographic data. Onset time of the block and the number of blocked dermatomes and hemodynamic parameters were similar in both groups. All VAS assessments were comparable between groups except VAS at the 36th hour postoperative, which was higher in the levobupivacaine group ( p = 0.039). Conclusions Thoracic epidural anesthesia with either levobupivacaine or bupivacaine provided comparable sensory block features, intraoperative hemodynamics, and postoperative analgesia for thoracic surgery.

Electroshock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a painful procedure performed with sedoanalgesia in paediatric patients. The propofol–ketamine combination may be the preferable anaesthesia for this procedure, and propofol–ketamine consumption may be decreased with the administration of intravenous (IV) paracetamol. In this study we investigated the effect of IV paracetamol administration on propofol–ketamine consumption, recovery time and frequency of adverse events in paediatric patients undergoing ESWL. Sixty children, ranging in age from 1 to 10 years and with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status 1–2, were included in this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Thirty minutes prior to the procedure children randomly assigned to Group I received IV 15 mg/kg paracetamol, and those randomly assigned to Group II received 1.5 mL/kg IV saline infusion 30 min. The propofol–ketamine combination was prepared by mixing 25 mg propofol and 25 mg ketamine in a total 10 mL solution in the same syringe. After the administration of 0.1 mg/kg midazolam and 10 μg/kg atropine to both groups and during the procedure, the propofol–ketamine combination was administered at 0.5 mg/kg doses to achieve a Wisconsin sedation score of 1 or 2. Oxygen saturation and heart rate were recorded at 5-min intervals. Propofol–ketamine consumption, recovery times and adverse events were also recorded. Demographic data were similar between groups. Propofol–ketamine consumption (Group I, 25.2 ± 17.7 mg; Group II, 35.4 ± 20.1 mg; p = 0.04) and recovery times (Group I, 19.4 ± 7.9 min; Group II, 29.6 ± 11.4 min; p

Ocular pain is often difficult to treat and may be caused by many eye diseases. The first step in pain management is medical therapy combined with analgesics; however, severe and resistant cases may require neurolytic eye blocks or definitive surgery. Retrobulbar block with neurolytic agents such as alcohol may be preferred, if the eye is cosmetically normal or the patient is medically or psychologically unsuitable for enucleation or evisceration. Here, we present our successful and efficient pain management using retrobulbar alcohol injection in 4 patients with painful blind eyes. Patients with neovascular glaucoma presenting with painful blind eyes were accepted to our clinic for pain management. The patients had continuous pain with an increasing severity in the recent months. We planned to perform retrobulbar alcohol injection as the pain of the patients was resistant to medical therapy. We noted measurement of verbal analogue scale for pain (VAS) before the block (7, 9, 9 and 10, respectively), after retrobulbar lidocaine and alcohol injection, at the postoperative 1st day, 1st, 2nd 3rd and 4th weeks, and 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th and 12th months. Early and late complications were also recorded. On the first day after injection, no patient required additive analgesic therapy and their VAS scores were 0, 0, 0, and 3, respectively. Except for one patient who underwent enucleation because of a bacterial infection, the other three patients' VAS scores were 1, 0 and 1 at the 12th month assessment. We suggest that neurolytic retrobulbar block is an efficient pain management strategy in blind painful eyes.

Pudendal neuralgia is a type of neuropathic pain experienced predominantly while sitting, and causes a substantial decrease in quality of life in affected patients. Pudendal nerve block is a diagnostic and therapeutic option for pudendal neuralgia. Transsacral block at S2 through S4 results in pudendal nerve block, which is an option for successful relief of pain due to pudendal nerve injury. Herein is reported blockade of S2 through S4 using lidocaine and methylprednisolone for successful treatment of pudendal neuralgia in 2 patients with severe chronic vaginal pain. The patients, aged 44 and 58 years, respectively, were referred from the Gynecology Department to the pain clinic because of burning, stabbing, electric shock-like, unilateral pain localized to the left portion of the vagina and extending to the perineum. Their initial pain scores were 9 and 10, respectively, on a numeric rating scale. Both patients refused pudendal nerve block using classical techniques. Therefore, diagnostic transsacral S2-S4 nerve block was performed using lidocaine 1%, and was repeated using lidocaine 1% and methylprednisolone 80 mg after confirming block efficiency as demonstrated by an immediate decrease in pain scores. After 1 month, pain scores were 1 and 0, respectively, and both patients were free of pain at 6-month follow up. It is suggested that blockade of S2 through S4 using lidocaine and methylprednisolone is an effective treatment option in patients with chronic pudendal neuralgia when traditional pudendal nerve block is not applicable.

Background: The ideal postoperative analgesia management of elderly surgical patients in intensive care units (ICUs) is continually being investigated. Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of IV administration of dexmedetomidine as an adjunct to a low-dose epidural bupivacaine infusion for postoperative analgesia after abdominal surgery in elderly patients in the ICU. Methods: ICU patients aged >70 years undergoing abdominal surgery were eligible for the study. A lumbar epidural catheter was inserted at the beginning of the surgery with no medication. On arrival at the ICU, the catheter was loaded with 0.25% bupivacaine 25 mg at the T8 to T10 sensory level, and a continuous infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine was started at 4 to 6 mL/h in combination with patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) of fentanyl (4 μg/bolus) for pain treatment. Patients in the treatment group received dexmedetomidine as an IV loading dose of 0.6 pg/kg for 30 minutes followed by continuous infusion at 0.2 μg/kg · h-1. Patients in the control group were not administered dexmedetomidine. The effectiveness of the pain relief was determined using a visual analog scale (VAS) (0 = no pain to 10 = worst pain imaginable) at rest. VAS score, heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure, and arterial blood gases were monitored periodically for 24 hours after surgery. If required, tenoxicam (20-mg IV bolus) was used to ensure a VAS score of ≤3. The number of times PCEA and tenoxicam were administered and the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) were also recorded. Results: Sixty patients (34 men, 26 women; mean [SD] age, 75.96 [4.25] years; mean [SD] weight, 74.13 [10.62] kg) were included in the study. VAS scores were significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group compared with the control group at hours 1, 2, and 12 (VAS [hour 1]: 2.8 [0.4], P < 0.001; VAS [hour 2]: 2.7 [0.5], P < 0.001; and VAS [hour 12]: 0.9 [0.7], P 0.044). The mean number of administrations of fentanyl via PCEA was significantly greater in the control group compared with the dexmedetomidine group (2.20 vs 6.63 times; P < 0.001). The mean number of administrations of tenoxicam was significantly lower in the treatment group than the control group (0.27 vs 1.07 times; P < 0.001). In the control group, the decreases in sedation at 0, 8, 12, 16, and 20 hours were significant compared with baseline (P = 0.024, P = 0.001, P = 0.020, P < 0.001, and P = 0.005, respectively). Mean HR, SBR and AEs (eg, bradycardia [HR

Pulmonary embolism (PE) after lung resection has a high mortality rate, and it is one of the most severe complications after lung resection. Early diagnosis and treatment are essential. We present a case of severe PE after left pneumonectomy for lung cancer. Computed tomography angiography was useful for confirming the diagnosis of PE. Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) was used to treat the embolism, and the patient was discharged on the seventh day. LMWH is an effective and safe agent for the treatment of PE after pneumonectomy and may reduce the need for surgery. It may be used as an initial procedure. Secondary severe complications, including hemorrhage and subsequent empyema, may be avoided with the use of LMWH.

Dear Editor, Pneumorrhachis and pneumocephalus are unusual complications of inadvertent dural puncture. We present the case of pneumorrhachis and pneumocephalus in a patient with lumbar spinal stenosis who was performed epidural steroid injection by using loss of resistance technique to air. A 37-year-old man with the history of spinal stenosis, low back pain, bilateral leg pain, and neurogenic claudication was performed epidural steroid (80 mg metil prednisolone) injection in another pain clinic. He complained of severe chest pain and headache aproximately 1 hour after epidural injection in the recovery room. The anesthesiologist who attempt epidural steroid …

Background/Aims: We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of lumbar plexus blockade with ropivacaine for postoperative pain relief in elderly patients undergoing flank incision for urological surgery. Methods: 60 urological patients (>65 years old) were chosen randomly for paravertebral lumbar blockade. Postoperatively ropivacaine was used in group I (n = 30) and bupivacaine was administered in group II (n = 30) for lumbar plexus blockade. Heart rates, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, peripheral oxygen saturations, analgesia levels with visual analogue scales (VAS) were measured postoperatively at 5 and 30 min and 1, 3, 6, 8,and 12 h. Patient satisfaction scores and complications were recorded. Results: The hemodynamic parameters of the groups were in the normal ranges (p > 0.05). VAS were significantly decreased at 60 min in both groups (p < 0.05) and no important increase was observed during the first 8 h (p > 0.05). After the 8-hour measurement, analgesic was given to 7 patients in group I and 6 patients in group II (p < 0.05). There were no complications (p > 0.05). Patient satisfaction scores were found to be higher for all patients (p > 0.05). Conclusion: In elderly patients, lumbar plexus blockade with ropivacaine can be a simple, safe and effective analgesic technique especially in the early postoperative period after urologic surgeries with flank incision.

WOS: 000184773700008 PubMed ID: 12890955 The efficiency and safety of patient-controlled epidural analgesia by using tramadol alone and combined with bupivacaine were investigated for postoperative pain treatment after major urological surgeries. For PCEA: in group I (n = 17) a loading dose of 20 mg tramadol with a continuous infusion of 1 mg/ml tramadol at a rate of 8 ml/h was given. In group II (n = 17), patients received an initial loading dose of 20 ml bupivacaine 0.125% and a supplemental continuous infusion of 8 ml/h. In group III (n = 17), a loading dose of 20 mg tramadol with 20 ml bupivacaine 0.125% were given and a supplemental infusion of 1 mg/ml tramadol in 20 ml bupivacaine 0.125% combination was begun with a rate of 8 ml/h. A demand epidural bolus dose of 5 ml with a lockout time of 30 min was also used in all patients. VAS for pain intensity, vital signs, sedation scale and side effects was monitored at 0, 15, 30 min and 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h of the postoperative period. Statistical significance was determined using Kruskal-Wallis, Fisher's exact, analysis of variance for repeated measurements and Tukey tests. The hemodynamic values and sedation scales were insignificantly different (p > 0.05). The adequate analgesia was provided in all patients. However VAS values were significantly lower in group III than in groups I and II at every measurement (p < 0.05). The incidence of side effects in all three groups was low (p > 0.05). In conclusion, we suggested that a combination of tramadol with bupivacaine can provide the most effective and safe postoperative analgesia with minimal risk for side effects. Copyright (C) 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel.

To the Editor: Non-obstetric surgery during gestation is rare [1]. Anesthesia management during gestation should focus on preservation of maternal hemodynamic stability, uteroplacental blood flow, and avoidance of maternal and fetal hypoxia during surgery [2]. Regional anesthesia confers some benefit in this patient population with less fetal drug involvement and simplified airway management. Spinal anesthesia (SA) offers the least amount of drug transfer for the achieved degree of anesthesia, and thus may be advised whenever possible [2]. Advantages of laparoscopy during pregnancy include decreased pain, earlier return of respiratory and bowel function, and earlier ambulation [3]. Despite its advantages, there may also be increased risk of fetal acidosis from carbon dioxide absorption and decreased uteroplacental blood flow secondary to increased intraperitoneal pressure during laparoscopy [3]. In addition to SA-related hypotension, increased intraabdominal pressure may also result in persistence of hypotension during laparoscopy; however, incidence of hypotension is no different whether laparoscopic surgery or laparotomy is being done with SA, provided that a low intraperitoneal pressure (\15 mmHg) is maintained which does not result in decreased venous return and hypotension [4, 5]. Another demerit of SA during laparoscopy might be the insufficiency of this method to overcome shoulder pain induced by peritoneal irritation. This pain results in employment of sedation, which may induce hypoventilation and hypercapnia during the procedure. However, reducing intraperitoneal pressure also improves the pain, allowing a decreased amount of drug administered for sedation, and end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring is an effective method for early detection of hypoventilation that may increase patient safety during the procedure [4, 5]. A 26-year-old woman, 155 cm and 60 kg, was referred for laparoscopic cholecystectomy caused by acute cholecystitis during the 13th week of her gestation. Obstetric ultrasonography revealed a healthy fetus in accord with gestational age. Following 1,000 ml normal saline infusion, SA was performed in left lateral decubitus position in the intervertebral space between L4 and L5. Hypertonic 0.5 % bupivacaine was administered to the subarachnoid space with a total dose of 12.5 mg in 20 s. The operation started after sensory neural block reached T3–T4 dermatome level in supine position. An incision was made; CO2 was used as the insufflating gas via Veress needle. Intraperitoneal pressure did not exceed 12 mmHg throughout the operation. Initially, propofol 2–3 mg/kg/h and additionally, upon patient request, 40 mg ketamine, which previously was shown to be non-uterotonic in the current dose [4], was administered against shoulder pain. Patient remained hemodynamically stable, without more than 20 % reduction of mean arterial pressure from baseline. Monitoring of the patient revealed neither oxygen desaturation nor hypercapnia, with well-maintained respiratory functions. Operation was successfully performed and finished in 60 min. Postoperative sensory motor block recovered completely in 3 h. Obstetric ultrasonography, performed at first and sixth postoperative hours, did not reveal any fetal adverse event. A. Kocum M. Sener S. Akin A. Aribogan Department of Anesthesia and Reanimation, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey