Search

Background Chest pain remains one of the most challenging serious complaints in the emergency department (ED). A prompt and accurate risk stratification tool for chest pain patients is paramount to help physcian effectively progrnosticate outcomes. HEART score is considered one of the best scores for chest pain risk stratification. However, most validation studies of HEART score were not performed in populations different from those included in the original one. Objective To validate HEART score as a prognostication tool, among Tunisian ED patients with undifferentiated chest pain. Methods Our prospective, multicenter study enrolled adult patients presenting with chest pain at chest pain units. Patients over 30 years of age with a primary complaint of chest pain were enrolled. HEART score was calculated for every patient. The primary outcome was major cardiovascular events (MACE) occurrence, including all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), and coronary revascularisation over 30 days following the ED visit. The discriminative power of HEART score was evaluated by the area under the ROC curve. A calibration analysis of the HEART score in this population was performed using Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness of test. Results We enrolled 3880 patients (age 56.3; 59.5% males). The application of HEART score showed that most patients were in intermediate risk category (55.3%). Within 30 days of ED visit, MACE were reported in 628 (16.2%) patients, with an incidence of 1.2% in the low risk group, 10.8% in the intermediate risk group and 62.4% in the high risk group. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.87 (95% CI 0.85–0.88). HEART score was not well calibrated (χ2 statistic = 12.34; p = 0.03). Conclusion HEART score showed a good discrimination performance in predicting MACE occurrence at 30 days for Tunisian patients with undifferentiated acute chest pain. Heart score was not well calibrated in our population.

BackgroundLittle is known about the pattern and appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions in patients with acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs).Objective Describe the antibiotics used to treat ARTIs in Tunisian primary care offices and emergency departments (EDs), and assess the appropriateness of their use.MethodsIt was a multicenter cross-sectional observational clinical study conducted at 63 primary care offices and 6 EDS during a period of 8 months. Appropriateness of antibiotic prescription was evaluated by trained physicians using the medication appropriateness index (MAI). The MAI ratings generated a weighted score of 0 to 18 with higher scores indicating low appropriateness. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and national and institutional standards. The study was approved by the Ethics committee of Monastir Medical Faculty.ResultsFrom the 12880 patients screened we included 9886 patients. The mean age was 47.4, and 55.4% were men. The most frequent diagnosis of ARTI was were acute bronchitis (45.3%), COPD exacerbation (16.3%), tonsillitis (14.6%), rhinopharyngitis (12.2%) and sinusitis (11.5%). The most prescribed classes of antibiotics were penicillins (58.3%), fluoroquinolones (17.6%), and macrolides (16.9%). Antibiotic therapy was inappropriate in 75.5% of patients of whom 65.2% had bronchitis. 65% of patients had one or more antibiotic prescribing inappropriateness criteria as assessed by the MAI. The most frequently rated criteria were with expensiveness (75.8%) and indication (40%). Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and levofloxacin were the most inappropriately prescribed antibiotics. History of cardiac ischemia ([OR] 3.66; 95% [CI] 2.17-10.26; p65 years (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-1.58; pConclusionOur findings indicate a high inappropriate use of antibiotics in ARTIs treated in in primary care and EDs. This was mostly related to antibiotic prescription in acute bronchitis and overuse of expensive broad spectrum antibiotics. Future interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing in primary care and EDs is needed.Trial registrationthe trial is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov registry (NCT04482231)

Hydatid pulmonary embolism rarely occurs. It arises from the rupture of a hydatid heart cyst or the opening of a visceral hydatid cyst into the venous circulation. We report a case with pulmonary hydatidosis resulting in a massive bilateral pulmonary embolism in a 56-year-old woman with history of hepatic echinococcosis. A brief overview of clinical features and radiologic findings is presented.

L'insuffisance antéhypophysaire post-traumatique (IAHPT) est une pathologie exceptionnelle mais de réalité certaine résultant des lésions ischémiques lors des traumatismes crâniens (TC) sévères. L'objectif est de préciser à partir d'une étude de cas les critères d'imputabilité de l'IAHPT suite au (TC) ainsi que les spécificités relatifs à sa réparation juridique. C'est une étude médico-légale d'un cas d'IAHPT, diagnostiqué et suivi au service d'endocrinologie et de médecine légale du CHU de Sousse (Tunisie). Il s'agit d'une femme âgée de 45 ans, sans antécédents pathologiques (6 gestes, 4 parités et 2 avortements) ayant un cycle menstruel régulier, sans notion d'accouchement hémorragique, qui a été victime d'un accident de la voie publique (piétonne, heurtée puis renversée par une voiture) occasionnant un TC avec point d'impact occipital sans perte de connaissance initiale; ayant présenté trois ans après l'accident, une hypothyroïdie. L'exploration hormonale rapporte l'atteinte de tous les autres axes. L'exploration neuroradiologique retrouve une intégrité de l'hypophyse et de la tige. Le diagnostic définitif est l'IAHPT. L'expertise médicale (faite 4 ans après l'accident) a conclue à l'imputabilité de l'IAHPT à l'accident. Le taux d'incapacité partielle permanente IIP en droit commun a été évalué à 25%. L'IAHPT est un diagnostic d'élimination. L'évaluation du dommage corporel doit tenir compte des symptômes résiduels, contraintes thérapeutiques et répercussions sur l'activité quotidienne et professionnelle. L'évolution sous hormonothérapie de substitution est souvent favorable, cependant, elle peut être émaillée de complications, d'où l'obligation d'établir des réserves préservant ainsi le droit du patient à une nouvelle révision.