1. Evaluating the Age-Based Recommendations for Long-Term Follow-Up in Breast Cancer
- Author
-
Philip Poortmans, Marjolein L. Smidt, Gabe S. Sonke, Sabine Siesling, Maarten Joost IJzerman, Catharina G.M. Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Ingrid M. H. Vliegen, Linda de Munck, Annemieke Witteveen, Liesbeth J. Boersma, Human Technology Interaction, Research Support and Valorization, Health Services Management & Organisation (HSMO), Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Radiotherapie, RS: GROW - R3 - Innovative Cancer Diagnostics & Therapy, Surgery, MUMC+: MA Heelkunde (9), and Health Technology & Services Research
- Subjects
Cancer Research ,Pediatrics ,YOUNGER ,IMPACT ,Second primary ,SDG 3 – Goede gezondheid en welzijn ,RELAPSE ,Risk-based follow-up ,0302 clinical medicine ,Breast cancer ,Cumulative incidence ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Registries ,CONSERVING TREATMENT ,Netherlands ,education.field_of_study ,WOMEN ,Second primary cancer ,Middle Aged ,Oncology ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Child, Preschool ,Female ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Long term follow up ,Population ,Risk‐based follow‐up ,Breast Neoplasms ,Lower risk ,03 medical and health sciences ,SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being ,medicine ,Humans ,Risk factor ,education ,Locoregional recurrence ,RECEPTOR ,business.industry ,CARE ,medicine.disease ,Cancer registry ,TUMOR RECURRENCE ,RISK-FACTORS ,Thresholds ,Human medicine ,Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ,business ,Follow-Up Studies - Abstract
Background After 5 years of annual follow‐up following breast cancer, Dutch guidelines are age based: annual follow‐up for women 75 years. We determined how the risk of recurrence corresponds to these consensus‐based recommendations and to the risk of primary breast cancer in the general screening population. Subjects, Materials, and Methods Women with early‐stage breast cancer in 2003/2005 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (n = 18,568). Cumulative incidence functions were estimated for follow‐up years 5–10 for locoregional recurrences (LRRs) and second primary tumors (SPs). Risks were compared with the screening population without history of breast cancer. Alternative cutoffs for age were determined by log‐rank tests. Results The cumulative risk for LRR/SP was lower in women 69 revealed better risk differentiation and would provide more risk‐based schedules. Still, other factors, including systemic treatments, had an even greater impact on recurrence risks. Conclusion The current consensus‐based recommendations use suboptimal age cutoffs. The proposed alternative cutoffs will lead to a more balanced risk‐based follow‐up and thereby more efficient allocation of resources. However, more factors should be taken into account for truly individualizing follow‐up based on risk for recurrence. Implications for Practice The current age‐based recommendations for breast cancer follow‐up after 5 years are suboptimal and do not reflect the actual risk of recurrent disease. This results in situations in which women with higher risks actually receive less follow‐up than those with a lower risk of recurrence. Alternative cutoffs could be a start toward risk‐based follow‐up and thereby more efficient allocation of resources. However, age, or any single risk factor, is not able to capture the risk differences and therefore is not sufficient for determining follow‐up. More risk factors should be taken into account for truly individualizing follow‐up based on the risk for recurrence., Actual survival benefits related to the intensive follow‐up recommendations of current guidelines for patients with breast cancer are unclear. This article analyses long‐term breast cancer recurrence patterns to determine how the current age‐based recommendations on follow‐up schedules after 5 years correspond to the actual risk of locoregional recurrence and second primary breast cancer. Alternative guidelines are proposed.
- Published
- 2020