Search

For patients with resectable, early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), surgery is the primary treatment; however, 5-year survival rates remain poor. Postoperative adjuvant platinum-doublet chemotherapy is associated with a statistically significant but modest improvement in survival of ∼5% at 5 years and is widely accepted as standard of care in patients with resectable, Stage II-III NSCLC. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been associated with similar improvements in overall survival to adjuvant therapy in this setting. Durvalumab, a high-affinity PD-L1 inhibitor, has become the standard of care for patients with unresectable, Stage III NSCLC following chemoradiotherapy based on improved progression-free and overall survival in the phase III PACIFIC trial. AEGEAN is a phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled, international study that will assess pathological and clinical outcomes of durvalumab plus chemotherapy prior to surgery, followed by durvalumab monotherapy after surgery in adults with resectable, Stage II-III NSCLC. Approximately 800 patients will be randomized (1:1) to receive durvalumab or placebo every 3 weeks (q3w) alongside platinum-based chemotherapy (≤4 cycles) prior to surgery, followed by durvalumab or placebo monotherapy q4w, for an additional 12 cycles post surgery, stratified by disease stage (IASLC 8th Edition, Stage II vs. Stage III) and PD-L1 tumor cell expression levels (

PURPOSE To investigate the efficacy of gefitinib as an adjuvant therapy for non–small-cell lung cancer patients with EGFR mutation. PATIENTS AND METHODS IMPACT (WJOG6410L; University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000006252 ), a randomized, open-label, phase III study, included patients with completely resected pathologic stage II-III non–small-cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletion or L858R) during September 2011 to December 2015. Patients were randomly assigned to receive gefitinib (250 mg once daily) for 24 months or cisplatin (80 mg/m2 on day 1) plus vinorelbine (25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8; cis/vin) once every 3 weeks for four cycles. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS Overall, 234 patients were randomly assigned. Among 232 eligible patients (116 each; excluding two who withdrew consent), the median DFS was 35.9 and 25.1 months in the gefitinib and cis/vin groups, respectively. However, Kaplan-Meier curves crossed around 4 years after surgery with no statistically significant difference (stratified log-rank P = .63; hazard ratio by stratified Cox proportional hazards model = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.28). Overall survival (OS) was also not different (stratified log-rank P = .89; hazard ratio = 1.03; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.65), with the 5-year OS rates being 78.0% and 74.6% in the gefitinib and cis/vin groups, respectively. Treatment-related deaths occurred in 0 and three patients in the gefitinib and cis/vin groups, respectively. CONCLUSION Although adjuvant gefitinib appeared to prevent early relapse, it did not prolong DFS or OS. However, similar DFS and OS may justify adjuvant gefitinib in the selected patient subsets, especially those deemed ineligible for platinum-doublet adjuvant therapy; however, this was not a noninferiority trial.

Adjuvant oral uracil-tegafur (UFT) has led to significantly longer postoperative survival among patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Gemcitabine (GEM) monotherapy is also reportedly effective for NSCLC and has minor adverse events (AEs). This study compared the efficacy of GEM- versus UFT-based adjuvant regimens in patients with completely resected pathological stage (p-stage) IB–IIIA NSCLC. Patients with completely resected p-stage IB–IIIA NSCLC were randomly assigned to GEM or UFT. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS), and AEs. We assigned 305 patients to the GEM group and 303 to the UFT group. Baseline factors were balanced between the arms. Of the 608 patients, 293 (48.1%) had p-stage IB disease, 195 (32.0%) had p-stage II disease and 121 (19.9%) had p-stage IIIA disease. AEs were generally mild in both groups, and only one death occurred, in the GEM group. After a median follow-up of 6.8 years, the two groups did not significantly differ in survival: 5 year OS rates were GEM: 70.0%, UFT: 68.8% (hazard ratio 0.948; 95% confidence interval 0.73–1.23; P = 0.69). Although GEM-based adjuvant therapy for patients with completely resected stage IB–IIIA NSCLC was associated with acceptable toxicity, it did not provide longer OS than did UFT.

Background To systematically assess the consistency of recommendations regarding diagnosis and treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Methods We systematically searched relevant literature databases and websites to identify CPGs related to NSCLC. We extracted the general characteristics of the included guidelines and their recommendations and descriptively compared and analyzed the consistency of recommendations across the guidelines. Results A total of 28 NSCLC guidelines were retrieved. The recommendations covered mainly diagnosis and treatment. The recommendations in the guidelines differed substantially in various topics, such as the application of positron emission tomography (PET) and the classification of stage III. Fourteen guidelines divided stage III into two types: operable and inoperable; and the remaining 14 guidelines into three sub-stages IIIA, IIIB and IIIC. Recommendations regarding the treatment in stage III were relatively inconsistent. In driver gene (EGFR, ALK, ROS1) positive patients, targeted therapy was the most common recommendation for first-line treatment, but recommendations regarding second-line treatment varied according to the site of the mutation. In driver gene negative patients, immunotherapy was the most frequently recommended option as both first- and second-line treatment, followed by chemotherapy. Discussion A number of countries are devoting themselves to develop NSCLC guidelines and the process of updating guidelines is accelerating, yet recommendations between guidelines are not consistent. We adopted a systematic review method to systematically search and analyze the NSCLC guidelines worldwide. We objectively reviewed the differences in recommendations for NSCLC diagnosis and treatment between the guidelines. Inconsistency of recommendations across guidelines can result from multiple potential reasons. Such as, the guidelines developed time, different countries and regions and many more. Poor consistency across CPGs can confuse the guideline users, and we therefore advocate paying more attention to examining the controversies and updating guidelines timely to improve the consistency among CPGs. Our study had also several limitations, we limited the search to CPGs published in Chinese or English, the interpretation of recommendations is inherently subjective, we did not evaluate the details of the clinical content of the CPG recommendations. Our research presents the current status of NSCLC guidelines worldwide and give the opportunity to pay more attention to the existing gaps. Further investigations should determine the reasons for inconsistency, the implications for recommendation development, and the role of synthesis across recommendations for optimal guidance of clinical care treatment. With the continuous revision and update of the guidelines, we are confident that future guidelines will be formulated with higher quality to form clear, definite and consistent recommendations for NSCLC diagnosis and treatment.

Few studies have so far focused on the preoperative presence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in lung cancer patients undergoing surgery. In this study, we investigated the prevalence and risk factors for preoperative deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in patients scheduled to undergo lung cancer surgery. Between June 2013 and December 2018, 948 consecutive patients underwent lung cancer surgery in Kindai University Hospital. Four patients did not undergo screening for DVT; thus, 944 patients were enrolled in this study. Preoperatively, venous ultrasonography of the lower extremities was performed in patients deemed at risk for DVT, and the prevalence and risk factors for preoperative DVT were examined. Ninety-one patients (9.6%) were diagnosed with preoperative DVT, and postoperative symptomatic pulmonary thromboembolism occurred in one patient (0.11%). A multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that female sex, age ≥ 72 years, history of VTE, a Wells score ≥ 2 points, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and lower hemoglobin levels were significantly associated with preoperative DVT. Female sex, age ≥ 72 years, history of VTE, Wells score ≥ 2 points, COPD, and lower hemoglobin levels were identified to be independent risk factors for preoperative DVT. Monitoring for these risk factors and management considering them should help improve the outcomes after lung cancer surgery.

To elucidate the clinical, pathologic, and prognostic impacts of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and mutation subtypes in early-stage lung cancer, the study investigators conducted a retrospective analysis of the Japanese Joint Committee of Lung Cancer Registry database (a nationwide database for patients with surgically resected lung cancer; n = 18,973).Of 13,951 patients classified as having nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer in the database, 5780 patients (41.0%) had been tested for an EGFR mutation and were included in this study.An EGFR mutation was detected in 2410 patients (41.7%), and the presence of an EGFR mutation was significantly correlated with clinicopathologic factors such as the presence of ground-glass opacity (P.001) and better prognosis. Analysis of initial recurrence sites identified significantly higher frequencies of brain and adrenal gland metastases in patients with and without an EGFR mutation, respectively. Of 2410 patients with EGFR mutations, 983 (40.8%) had an exon 19 deletion (Exon 19 Del), 1170 (48.5%) had an L858R mutation, and 257 (10.7%) had other EGFR mutations. A higher smoking rate was found in patients with other EGFR mutations (P = .02). In the comparison of Exon 19 Del and L858R, we found that Exon 19 Del correlated with younger age (P.001), a higher rate of pure solid tumors (P.001), advanced pathologic stage (trend P.001), and poorer recurrence-free survival (P = .001).In addition to the clinicopathologic and prognostic impacts of EGFR mutation status, tumors with Exon 19 Del have a more aggressive phenotype and patients have a poorer prognosis than with L858R in early-stage lung cancers.

Background Implementation of personalized medicine requires the accessibility of tumor molecular profiling in order to allow prioritization of appropriate targeted therapies for individual patients. Our aim was to study the role of comprehensive genomic profiling assays that may inform treatment recommendations for patients with solid tumors. Materials and Methods We performed a prospective study to evaluate the feasibility of application of the FoundationOne CDx panel—which detects substitutions, insertions and deletions, and copy number alterations in 324 genes, select gene rearrangements, and genomic signatures including microsatellite instability and tumor mutation burden (TMB)—to patients with advanced or recurrent solid tumors before its approval in Japan. Results A total of 181 samples were processed for genomic testing between September 2018 and June 2019, with data being successfully obtained for 175 of these samples, yielding a success rate of 96.7%. The median turnaround time was 41 days (range, 21–126 days). The most common known or likely pathogenic variants were TP53 mutations (n = 113), PIK3CA mutations (n = 33), APC mutations (n = 32), and KRAS mutations (n = 29). Among the 153 patients assessed for TMB, the median TMB was 4 mutations/Mb, and tumors with a high TMB (≥10 mutations/Mb) were more prevalent for lung cancer (11/32) than for other solid tumor types (9/121, Fisher's exact test p < .01). No clear trend toward increased efficacy for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy or ICI combination chemotherapy in patients with a high programmed cell death–ligand 1 tumor proportion score or a high TMB was apparent. Among the 174 patients found to harbor known or likely pathogenic actionable alterations, 24 individuals (14%) received matched targeted therapy. Conclusion The FoundationOne CDx assay was performed with formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded tumor specimens with a success rate of >95%. Such testing may inform the matching of patients with cancer with investigational or approved targeted drugs. Implications for Practice This prospective cohort study was initiated to investigate the feasibility and utility of clinical application of FoundationOne CDx. A total of 181 samples were processed for genomic testing between September 2018 and June 2019, with data being successfully obtained for 175 of these samples, yielding a success rate of 96.7%, and 24 individuals (14%) received matched targeted therapy., Comprehensive genomic profiling assays can identify multiple actionable genetic alterations that may inform treatment recommendations for patients with solid tumors. This article evaluates the feasibility of the application of the FoundationOne CDx panel to patients with advanced or recurrent solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies of advanced lung cancer patients have shown that circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis is useful for molecular profiling, monitoring tumor burden, and predicting therapeutic efficacies and disease progression. However, the usefulness of ctDNA analysis in surgically resected lung cancers is unclear. METHODS: This study included 20 lung cancer patients with clinical stage IIA–IIIA disease. Preoperative and postoperative (3–12 days) plasma samples were collected for ctDNA analysis. Cancer personalized profiling by deep sequencing, which can detect mutations in 197 cancer-related genes, was used for ctDNA detection. The cohort consisted of 18 men and 2 women with a median age of 69 (range, 37–88) years. Sixteen patients (80%) had a history of smoking. Histologically, there were four squamous cell carcinomas, 13 adenocarcinomas, two adenosquamous cell carcinomas, and one small cell carcinoma. RESULTS: At the time of data analysis, the 20 patients had been monitored for a median follow-up of 12 months. Eight patients (40%) were positive for preoperative ctDNA, and this was significantly correlated with tumor size (≥5 vs.

Background First-line treatment of non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has undergone a paradigm shift to platinum combination therapy together with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). Bevacizumab is expected to enhance not only chemotherapy but also the efficacy of ICIs through blockade of vascular endothelial growth factor–mediated immunosuppression. We have now designed a randomized phase 3 study (APPLE, WJOG11218L, JapicCTI-194565) to evaluate the additional effect of bevacizumab administered together with platinum combination therapy and the ICI atezolizumab in patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC. Patients and Methods Cytotoxic chemotherapy–naive patients aged 20 years or older with a performance status of 0 or 1 are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either atezolizumab plus pemetrexed/carboplatin or atezolizumab, pemetrexed/carboplatin, and bevacizumab. Patients with genetic driver alterations such as those affecting EGFR or ALK are included if they have experienced disease progression or unacceptable adverse effects during treatment with at least one approved tyrosine kinase inhibitor. After 4 cycles of induction therapy, maintenance therapy with atezolizumab plus pemetrexed or with atezolizumab, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab is administered for up to 2 years until evidence of disease progression or development of unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point is progression-free survival. Conclusion This is a phase 3 study to investigate the effect of adding bevacizumab to an ICI and platinum/pemetrexed combination therapy. If the primary objective is achieved, this study will provide a new standard treatment for cytotoxic chemotherapy–naive patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC.

A high plasma level of either fibrinogen or d-dimer has been shown to correlate with a poor prognosis in patients with surgically resected non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The present study aimed to identify whether or not both markers combined had a superior prognostic value to either alone. Of the 1344 patients who underwent surgical resection for NSCLC at our institution between January 2007 and December 2016, 1065 had preoperative plasma fibrinogen and d-dimer data available and were included in the analysis. The recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were similar for patients with high plasma levels of either or both fibrinogen (> 4.0 g/L) or d-dimer (> 1.0 μg/mL); therefore, these three groups were combined for a further analysis into a single group with high plasma levels of either or both proteins. The high-level group had significantly lower 5-year RFS (53% vs. 68%, p

We investigated whether genetic susceptibility to tuberculosis (TB) influences lung adenocarcinoma development among never-smokers using TB genome-wide association study (GWAS) results within the Female Lung Cancer Consortium in Asia. Pathway analysis with the adaptive rank truncated product method was used to assess the association between a TB-related gene-set and lung adenocarcinoma using GWAS data from 5512 lung adenocarcinoma cases and 6277 controls. The gene-set consisted of 31 genes containing known/suggestive associations with genetic variants from previous TB-GWAS. Subsequently, we followed-up with Mendelian Randomization to evaluate the association between TB and lung adenocarcinoma using three genome-wide significant variants from previous TB-GWAS in East Asians. The TB-related gene-set was associated with lung adenocarcinoma (p = 0.016). Additionally, the Mendelian Randomization showed an association between TB and lung adenocarcinoma (OR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.66, p = 0.027). Our findings support TB as a causal risk factor for lung cancer development among never-smoking Asian women.

Primary analysis of the phase III study WJTOG 3405 demonstrated superiority of progression-free survival (PFS) for gefitinib (G) in patients treated with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) gefitinib compared with cisplatin plus docetaxel (CD) as the first-line treatment of stage IIIB/IV or postoperative recurrent EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. This report presents final overall survival (OS) data.Patients were randomized between G (250 mg/day orally) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2 intravenously) plus docetaxel (60 mg/m2 i.v.), administered every 21 days for three to six cycles. After the exclusion of 5 patients, 172 patients (86 in each group, modified intention-to-treat population) were included in the survival analysis. OS was re-evaluated using updated data (data cutoff, 30 September 2013; median follow-up time 59.1 months). The Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test were used for analysis, and hazard ratios (HRs) for death were calculated using the Cox proportional hazards model.OS events in the G group and CD group were 68 (79.1%) out of 86 and 59 (68.6%) out of 86, respectively. Median survival time for G and CD were 34.9 and 37.3 months, respectively, with an HR of 1.252 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.883-1.775, P = 0.2070]. Multivariate analysis identified postoperative recurrence and stage IIIB/IV disease as independent prognostic factors, with an HR of 0.459 (95% CI: 0.312-0.673, P 0.001). Median survival time (postoperative recurrence versus stage IIIB/IV disease) were 44.5 and 27.5 months in the G group and 45.5 and 32.8 months in the CD group, respectively.G did not show OS benefits over CD as the first-line treatment. OS of patients with postoperative recurrence was better than that of stage IIIB/IV disease, even though both groups had metastatic disease.This study was registered with UMIN (University Hospital Medical Information Network in Japan), number 000000539.

BACKGROUND The differential diagnosis of a solitary solid-type lung nodule is diverse. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) has a high sensitivity in the diagnosis of solid-type lung cancers; however, PET-negative, solid-type lung cancers are rarely observed. In this study, we analyzed the clinical/genetic features and prognosis of PET-negative, solid-type lung cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between January 2007 and February 2020, 709 patients with solid-type lung cancers (tumor size ≥2.0 cm) underwent pulmonary resection. Clinical, genetic, and prognostic features were evaluated in 27 patients (3.8%) with tumors showing negative PET results defined as SUVmax

Simple Summary This review presents the development of perioperative treatment using immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancers. There are several ongoing phase 3 trials for adjuvant and neoadjuvant ICI therapies. The results of the adjuvant (IMpower010 trial) and the neoadjuvant (Checkmate 816 trial) ICI phase 3 trials have shown prolonged disease-free survival and increased pathological complete response rate, respectively. Based on the hypothesis that ‘preoperative ICI treatment, especially in combination with conventional chemotherapy, promotes a higher immune response because of preservation of the immune environment’, neoadjuvant trials using ICIs and conventional chemotherapy in combination are currently being conducted more frequently than adjuvant ICI trials. Multimodality approaches using chemoradiotherapy and new ICI agents are also being examined in several phase 2 trials. To maximise ICI therapy’s efficacy and to minimise futile administration, methodologies for predicting and monitoring the therapeutic effects, such as detecting minimal residual disease, need to be established. Abstract The emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has dramatically changed the treatment landscape for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These achievements inspired investigators and pharmaceutical companies to conduct clinical trials in patients with early-stage NSCLC because both adjuvant and neoadjuvant platinum-based doublet chemotherapies (PT-DCs) showed only a 5% improvement in 5-year overall survival. IMpower010, a phase 3 trial (P3), showed that adjuvant PT-DC followed by maintenance atezolitumab significantly prolonged disease-free survival over adjuvant PT-DC alone (hazard ratio, 0.79; stage II to IIIA). Since conventional therapies, including chemotherapy and radiotherapy, can promote immunogenic cell death, releasing tumour antigens from dead tumour cells, ICI combination therapies with conventional therapies are widely proposed. The Checkmate 816 trial (P3) indicated a significantly higher pathological complete response rate of neoadjuvant nivolumab/PT-DC combination therapy than of neoadjuvant PT-DC alone (odds ratio, 13.9, for stage IB to IIIA). Detection of circulating tumour DNA is highly anticipated for the evaluation of minimal residual disease. Multimodal approaches and new ICI agents are being attempted to improve the efficacy of ICI treatment in phase 2 trials. This review presents the development of perioperative treatment using ICIs in patients with NSCLC while discussing problems and perspectives.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the standard of care for non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring EGFR mutations. However, almost all patients develop resistance after approximately 1 y of treatment, with >50% of cases due to the T790M secondary mutation of the EGFR gene. A large global Phase III study (AURA3) demonstrated that osimertinib significantly prolonged progression‐free survival (PFS) over platinum‐doublet chemotherapy in patients with T790M‐positive NSCLC who had progressed on previous EGFR‐TKI therapy. However, it is not clear whether efficacy or safety of osimertinib in Japanese patients is similar to the overall population. We report a pre‐planned subgroup analysis of pooled Phase II data from the AURA Extension and AURA2 trials to investigate the efficacy and safety of osimertinib in Japanese patients. This study included 81 Japanese patients. Patients were administered 80 mg osimertinib orally once daily until disease progression. The main endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), PFS, and safety. The ORR was 63.6% and median PFS was 13.8 mo. Overall survival rate at 36 mo was 54.0%. The most common all‐cause adverse events (AEs) were rash (grouped term; 65.4%), diarrhea (51.9%), paronychia (grouped term; 49.4%), and dry skin (grouped term; 39.5%). Most AEs were grade 1‐2. Five patients (6.2%) developed interstitial lung disease, resulting in two deaths (2.5%). Osimertinib demonstrated favorable ORR and PFS in Japanese patients, similar to the overall population. Additionally, osimertinib has good efficacy and a manageable safety profile in Japanese patients with NSCLC who had acquired resistance due to the T790M mutation.

The most recent version of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was published in 2016. At the ESMO Asia Meeting in November 2017 it was decided by both ESMO and the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) to convene a special guidelines meeting immediately after the Chinese Thoracic Oncology Group Annual Meeting 2018, in Guangzhou, China. The aim was to adapt the ESMO 2016 guidelines to take into account the ethnic differences associated with the treatment of metastatic NSCLC cancer in Asian patients. These guidelines represent the consensus opinions reached by experts in the treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC representing the oncological societies of China (CSCO), Japan (JSMO), Korea (KSMO), Malaysia (MOS), Singapore (SSO) and Taiwan (TOS). The voting was based on scientific evidence, and was independent of both the current treatment practices and the drug availability and reimbursement situations in the six participating Asian countries. During the review process, the updated ESMO 2018 Clinical Practice Guidelines for metastatic NSCLC were released and were also considered, during the final stages of the development of the Pan-Asian adapted Clinical Practice Guidelines.

The morbidity and mortality associated with lung cancer surgery in patients on chronic hemodialysis (CHD) is high; however, the relationship between the severity of postoperative complications and clinicopathological features is unclear. Among 1214 consecutive patients who underwent pulmonary resection for primary lung cancer in our institute between 2004 and 2015, we identified 21 patients on CHD, who were the subjects of this study. Life-threatening postoperative complications were defined as grade 4 and 5 per the Clavien–Dindo classification. Fourteen (67%) of these 21 patients suffered postoperative complications, which were life threatening in 5. There was a higher frequency of interstitial pneumonia (IP) in the patients with life-threatening postoperative complications than in those with complications that were not life threatening (p = 0.032). The rates of acute exacerbation and 90-day mortality in the patients with IP were 50% and 75%, respectively. The overall survival (OS) rate of the patients with life-threatening postoperative complications was significantly lower than that of those with complications that were not life threatening (1- and 3-year OS rates: 40% and 0% vs. 80% and 57%, respectively, p = 0.001). Postoperative mortality and morbidity were high in patients on CHD who underwent pulmonary resection, especially if they had coexisting IP. Although IP is not a contraindication to pulmonary resection, the surgical strategy for CHD patients with IP should be considered carefully.

Background Osimertinib is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that is selective for both EGFR-TKI-sensitizing and T790M (threonine-to-methionine substitution at codon 790)-resistance mutations. The authors present long-term follow-up data from a preplanned, pooled analysis of phase 2 studies, the AZD9291 First Time in Patients Ascending Dose Study (AURA) extension trial (clincialtrials.gov identifier NCT01802632) and the AURA2 trial (NCT02094261). Methods Patients with centrally confirmed, T790M mutation-positive, advanced non-small cell lung cancer received osimertinib 80 mg once daily until disease progression or study discontinuation. Response was assessed by a blinded, independent, central review using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate. Results In total, 411 patients received osimertinib (second line, 129 patients; third line or later, 282 patients). At the data cutoff date of November 1, 2016, the median treatment exposure was 16.4 months (range, 0-29.7 months), the objective response rate was 66% (95% confidence interval [CI], 61%-70%), the median response duration was 12.3 months (95% CI, 11.1-13.8 months), and the median progression-free survival was 9.9 months (95% CI, 9.5-12.3 months). At the data cutoff date of May 1, 2018, 271 patients (66%) had died, and 140 patients (34%) had discontinued before death. The median overall survival was 26.8 months (95% CI, 24.0-29.1 months); and the 12-month, 24-month, and 36-month survival rates were 80%, 55%, and 37%, respectively. Grade ≥3 possibly causally related (investigator assessed) adverse events were reported in 65 patients (16%), and the most common were rash (grouped terms; 42%; grade ≥3, 1%) and diarrhea (39%; Conclusions This pooled analysis represents the most mature clinical trial data for osimertinib in patients with pretreated, T790M-positive, advanced non-small cell lung cancer, further establishing osimertinib as a standard of care for this patient population.

Definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has been a standard of care for patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, locoregional recurrence occurs in about 30% of patients after definitive CRT. Recently, the addition of durvalumab as maintenance therapy has shown to improve the outcome of these patients. However, locoregional recurrence will still remain. "Salvage surgery" has been performed to achieve local control in clinical practice, although its clinical significance is unclear. In this review, we define salvage surgery as lung resection for local control of the tumor which was not planned initially, after failure or insufficient treatment effect of the initial CRT for locally advanced cancer and evaluated nine studies to gain some insights on its role in the treatment of lung cancer. The time from radiotherapy (RT) to salvage surgery varied considerably (range, 3 to 282 weeks). Salvage surgery was performed for persistent disease (47%) and locoregional recurrence (52%). Lobectomy (63%) and mediastinal lymph node dissections (90%) were the most common procedures. However, the rate of pneumonectomy was higher in salvage surgery (28%) compared to that in lung resection in general. The median morbidity was 41% (range, 15% to 62%) and the mortality was 4% (range, 0 to 11%) which appeared acceptable. The median recurrence-free survival and overall survival (OS) after salvage surgery ranged from 10 to 22 months and 13 to 76 months, respectively. Favorable prognostic factors of salvage surgery were longer period from RT to salvage surgery and radiological downstaging. The pathological response was also prognostic, although this information cannot be obtained preoperatively. We conclude that salvage surgery can be considered especially for those with late local recurrence or those with the metabolic response. Given the condition where phase III trials are difficult, the accumulation of real-world evidence in a prospective fashion will be necessary.

Background: Lobectomy is the standard of care for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The survival and clinical benefits of segmentectomy have not been investigated in a randomized trial setting. We conducted a randomized controlled noninferiority trial comparing segmentectomy and lobectomy for small-sized peripheral NSCLC. Methods: Patients with clinical stage IA NSCLC (tumor diameter ≤2 cm; consolidation/tumor ratio > 0·5) were randomly assigned to undergo either lobectomy or segmentectomy. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints included postoperative respiratory function, relapse-free survival (RFS), proportion of local relapse, and adverse events. Findings: Between August 10, 2009 and October 21, 2014, 1106 patients (lobectomy, n = 554; segmentectomy, n = 552) were enrolled. Patient baseline clinicopathological factors were well balanced. At a median follow-up of 7·3 years, the 5-year OS was 94·3% for segmentectomy and 91·1% for lobectomy. Superiority as well as noninferiority in OS were confirmed using a stratified Cox regression model (hazard ratio [HR], 0·663; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0·474–0·927; one-sided P < 0·0001 for noninferiority; P = 0·0082 for superiority). Improved OS was observed consistently across all predefined subgroups in the segmentectomy arm. The significant differences at 1 year in the reduction of median forced expiratory volume in 1 second at 1 year between the two arms was 3·5% ( P < 0·0001), which did not reach the predefined threshold of 10%. The 5-year RFS was 88·0% for segmentectomy and 87·9% for lobectomy (HR, 0·998; 95% CI, 0·753–1·323). The proportions of local relapse were 10·5% and 5·4% for segmentectomy and lobectomy, respectively ( P = 0·0018). Fifty-two (63%) of 83 patients and 27 (47%) of 58 patients died of other diseases after lobectomy and segmentectomy, respectively. Interpretation: This was the first phase 3 trial to demonstrate the benefits of segmentectomy in OS. Segmentectomy should be the standard surgical procedure for patients with small-sized peripheral NSCLC. Trial Registration: University Hospital Medical Information Network–Clinical Trial Registry Number: UMIN000002317. Funding: Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan and the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development Declaration of Interest: All authors declare no competing interests for this study. Ethical Approval: The study protocol was approved by the JCOG and WJOG Protocol Review Committees and the institutional review boards of all participating hospitals.

Although precision medicine has had a mixed impact on the clinical management of patients with advanced-stage cancer overall, for NSCLC, and more specifically for lung adenocarcinoma, the advances have been dramatic, largely owing to the genomic complexity and growing number of druggable oncogene drivers. Furthermore, although tumor tissue is historically the "accepted standard" biospecimen for these molecular analyses, there are considerable innate limitations. Thus, liquid biopsy represents a practical alternative source for investigating tumor-derived somatic alterations. Although data are most robust in NSCLC, patients with other cancer types may also benefit from this minimally invasive approach to facilitate selection of targeted therapies. The liquid biopsy approach includes a variety of methodologies for circulating analytes. From a clinical point of view, plasma circulating tumor DNA is the most extensively studied and widely adopted alternative to tissue tumor genotyping in solid tumors, including NSCLC, first entering clinical practice for detection of EGFR mutations in NSCLC. Since the publication of the first International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) liquid biopsy statement in 2018, several additional advances have been made in this field, leading to changes in the therapeutic decision-making algorithm for advanced NSCLC and prompting this 2021 update. In view of the novel and impressive technological advances made in the past few years, the growing clinical application of plasma-based, next-generation sequencing, and the recent Food and Drug and Administration approval in the United States of two different assays for circulating tumor DNA analysis, IASLC revisited the role of liquid biopsy in therapeutic decision-making in a recent workshop in October 2020 and the question of "plasma first" versus "tissue first" approach toward molecular testing for advanced NSCLC. Moreover, evidence-based recommendations from IASLC provide an international perspective on when to order which test and how to interpret the results. Here, we present updates and additional considerations to the previous statement article as a consensus from a multidisciplinary and international team of experts selected by IASLC.

Introduction We describe our ongoing multicenter, prospective, single-arm, phase II trial of neoadjuvant concurrent chemo-immuno-radiation therapy followed by surgical resection and adjuvant immunotherapy for resectable stage IIIA-B (discrete N2) non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (registered at the Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center, Clinical Trials Information-195069). Patients and Methods Key inclusion criteria include (1) clinical T1-3/T4 (tumor size) N2 stage IIIA-B NSCLC, and (2) pathologically confirmed N2 without extranodal invasion (based on diagnostic imaging). Patients will receive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (carboplatin [area under the curve = 2] and paclitaxel [40 mg/m2] on days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29, with involved-field radiation therapy [RT] [dose 50 Gy] on days 1-25) and neoadjuvant immunotherapy (durvalumab [1500 mg] on days 1 and 29). Surgical resection with mediastinal lymph node dissection is performed within 2 to 6 weeks after RT. Consolidation therapy with durvalumab is administered for up to 1 year after surgery. The primary endpoint is major pathologic response (MPR) (≤10% residual viable tumor) according to the central pathological assessment. Secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. The sample size is planned to be 31 patients based on the exact binomial distribution with a 1-sided significance level of 5% and a power of 80%, and assuming a threshold MPR rate of 40% and an expected MPR rate of 65%. Conclusion This trial will help establish a novel treatment strategy for resectable N2-positive NSCLC.

Purpose of review The current status of postoperative adjuvant therapy for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is reviewed. Recent findings Cisplatin-based postoperative chemotherapy is a current standard of care for patients with stage II-III NSCLC who underwent complete resection. However, its benefit is limited. In these 20 years, the introduction of targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors has dramatically changed the treatment of metastatic lung cancer. The accumulated knowledge is now being applied in the adjuvant setting and many clinical trials are underway. Recently, postoperative osimertinib was shown to greatly prolong disease-free survival of patients with resected, stage II/IIIA NSCLC with EGFR mutation with an unprecedented hazard ratio of 0.17 in ADAURA study. Furthermore, initial results of adjuvant studies of immune checkpoint inhibitors are expected to be reported shortly. Summary As lung cancer is inherently prone to metastasize even though it looks in its earlier stage, it is essential to develop a newer generation of adjuvant therapies to improve patient outcomes. To this end, international and multidisciplinary collaboration is key to establish a new standard of care. It is anticipated that the treatment algorithm of early-stage lung cancer will be completely revised in 5 years using a more individualized approach.

Objectives The prognostic impact of surgical intervention for recurrent or residual non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement after tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment remains unclear. We aimed to describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing salvage surgery in this setting. Methods We retrospectively collected and analyzed nationwide Japanese data on perioperative and postoperative outcomes of patients who underwent salvage surgery after EGFR or ALK-TKI during 2010−2015. The primary endpoint was a 3-year overall survival (OS) rate and secondary endpoints were the rate of adverse events, perioperative mortality rate, 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate, and median survival time after salvage lung resection. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent prognostic factors of OS and RFS. Results Thirty-six patients were included (EGFR-TKI: 33, ALK-TKI: 3). The 3-year OS and RFS after the surgery were 75.1 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 55.9–86.9 %) and 22.2 % (95 % CI 8.6–39.7 %), respectively. Of clinicopathological factors, the progression of disease while on TKI and preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels (≥5 ng/mL) were shown to be worse independent prognosticators of OS (hazard ratio [HR] 9.38, 95 % CI 1.57–55.88, P = .014; HR 4.84, 95 % CI 1.62–14.46, P = .005, respectively). Older age at initial treatment (≥70 years) and advanced pathological T stage (T2-T4) were the worse prognosticators for RFS (HR 12.58, 95 % CI 2.51–62.97, P = .002; HR 3.06, 95 % CI 1.04–9.03, P = .043, respectively). Grade 3 adverse events occurred in 5.6 % (2/36) patients, but no deaths were reported within 90 days after surgery. Conclusion Our study showed that salvage surgery after TKI treatment was safe and feasible and may contribute to prolonged OS time by reducing the local tumor burden.

Background Overcoming acquired resistance against targeted therapies to improve outcomes of lung cancer patients harboring driver mutations is a critical issue. While drug therapy oriented to a resistance mechanism appears attractive, spatial heterogeneity of resistance mechanisms in each patient will diminish treatment efficacy. However, the frequency, clinical backgrounds, clinical implications, and patterns of spatial heterogeneity in resistance mechanisms to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are largely unknown. Patients and methods This study included 128 specimens from 24 autopsied patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR mutation. Acquired resistance mechanisms reported as relatively frequent in lung cancer, e.g., T790 M and other secondary EGFR mutations, MET and ERBB2 gene amplification, and histological transformation, were retrospectively examined. All patients had received 1st/2nd generation EGFR-TKI and showed acquired resistance to the drug before death. No patient received osimertinib. Results No resistance mechanism was identified in two patients. T790M mutation was detected in 20 patients (83 %); however, nine of these patients also had lesions without T790M mutation. Among 22 patients whose resistance mechanisms were identified, ten had spatial heterogeneity of resistance mechanisms (45 %), and these patients had significantly shorter time-to-treatment failure compared with those without heterogeneity (median 4.7 months vs. 14.7 months, p = 0.0004). Conclusion We observed significant spatial heterogeneity of acquired resistance mechanisms to EGFR-TKIs in lung adenocarcinoma. Our results also indicate that the incidence of resistance mechanisms may vary based on the biopsied tumor locations.

Backgrounds Since the recent development of molecular targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors has improved lung cancer treatment options and outcomes, supporting patients in balancing work and pharmacotherapy have become even more important in the field of lung cancer treatment. This study sought to identify the current status and roles of doctors in balancing work and treatment for lung cancer patients. Methods Patients and doctors were recruited to complete a web‐based questionnaire survey by the Japan Lung Cancer Society. Results About 287 lung cancer patients and 381 doctors were included in the analysis. About 42.9% of patients responded that “there was no discussion” about their working conditions or work before the initiation of pharmacotherapy, while 22.6% responded that “there was an inquiry from a doctor/health care provider and a discussion that included the doctor was held.” About 45.3% of patients took leave or resigned from work at the time of diagnosis. The most common reasons for patients to resign before or during pharmacotherapy were “poor physical condition due to side effects of treatment or illness” and “concern about causing problems in the workplace.” To assist in balancing work and pharmacotherapy, patients desired “increased opportunities to consult about work” (36.9%) and “provision of treatment options with few adverse events” (28.9%). Conclusion This study highlights the importance of doctor‐initiated management of the balance between work and treatment for lung cancer patients. An important first step is for doctors themselves to take an interest in their patients' professions and initiate discussions of work‐related topics with their patients., A web‐based questionnaire survey for patients and doctors by the Japan Lung Cancer Society highlights the importance of doctor‐initiated management of the balance between work and treatment for lung cancer patients. An important first step is for doctors themselves to take an interest in their patients' professions and initiate discussions of work‐related topics with their patients.

PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy of pemetrexed plus cisplatin versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with pathologic stage II-IIIA nonsquamous non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a randomized, open-label, phase III study at 50 institutions within 7 clinical study groups in Japan. Patients with completely resected pathologic stage II-IIIA (TNM 7th edition) nonsquamous NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive either pemetrexed (500 mg/m2, day 1) plus cisplatin (75 mg/m2, day 1) or vinorelbine (25 mg/m2, days 1 and 8) plus cisplatin (80 mg/m2, day 1) with stratification by sex, age, pathologic stage, EGFR mutation, and institution. These treatments were planned to be given every 3 weeks for 4 cycles. The primary end point was recurrence-free survival in the modified intent-to-treat population, excluding ineligible patients. RESULT Between March 2012 and August 2016, 804 patients were enrolled (402 assigned to vinorelbine plus cisplatin and 402 assigned to pemetrexed plus cisplatin). Of 784 eligible patients, 410 (52%) had stage IIIA disease and 192 (24%) had EGFR-sensitive mutations. At a median follow-up of 45.2 months, median recurrence-free survival was 37.3 months for vinorelbine plus cisplatin and 38.9 months for pemetrexed plus cisplatin, with a hazard ratio of 0.98 (95% CI, 0.81 to 1.20; 1-sided P = .474). Grade 3-4 toxicities reported more frequently for vinorelbine plus cisplatin than for pemetrexed plus cisplatin were febrile neutropenia (11.6% v 0.3%, respectively), neutropenia (81.1% v 22.7%, respectively), and anemia (9.3% v 2.8%, respectively). One treatment-related death occurred in each arm. CONCLUSION Although this study failed to show the superiority of pemetrexed plus cisplatin for patients with resected nonsquamous NSCLC, this regimen showed a better tolerability as adjuvant chemotherapy.

Clinical applications for precision medicine with molecular-targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors have dramatically improved treatment outcomes for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, because precision medicine is precise, small genetic or transcriptional differences between cancer cells may affect the efficacies of these drugs. Therefore, studies on intra- and inter-tumor heterogeneity are important in the era of precision medicine (1), especially when spatial heterogeneity can bias the biomarker test results (2). Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein expression, assessed via immunohistochemistry (IHC), is the only Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved biomarker for anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapies for NSCLC. An IHC assay using the 22C3 antibody was approved as a companion diagnostic test for front-line pembrolizumab, and an assay using the 28-8 antibody was approved as a complementary diagnostic test for nivolumab. However, no solid evidence exists regarding which tumor tissues should be used (e.g., primary lung tumors, lymph node metastases, or distant lesions) for PD-L1 IHC testing to predict anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 blockade efficacy. Current clinical practice allows use of any of these tissue specimens for PD-L1 IHC testing, which is reasonable because previous “practice-changing” phase III trials of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 agents did not restrict tissues for PD-L1 testing. For example, an analysis of the prevalence of PD-L1 expression in NSCLC patients screened for enrollment in the KEYNOTE-001, -010, and -024 trials found that 1,727 patients had their primary tumor tissues tested, and 1,281 had their metastatic samples tested. Of these patients, 437 (25%) who provided primary lung tumor tissues and 369 (29%) who provided metastatic samples had high PD-L1 expression, which is defined as a tumor proportion score (TPS) of ≥50% (3).

Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is a disease with heterogeneous manifestations that arise from a variety of modes of spread from the primary disease. The lung is a common site of metastasis from breast cancer. A solitary lung nodule appearing on radiological examination following breast cancer treatment is likely to be diagnosed as pulmonary metastasis from breast cancer. However, the reported final pathological diagnoses include primary lung cancer and MBC in approximately 48–67% and 23–43% of cases, respectively. Moreover, some pulmonary metastases of breast cancer have radiological and histological characteristics similar to those of primary lung cancer. Thus, the differential diagnosis of a solitary lung nodule after treatment of breast cancer is challenging. Oligometastatic disease (OMD) is characterized by solitary or limited numbers of detectable metastatic lesions. OMD in the lung from colorectal cancer can be considered for locoregional treatments either alone or in combination with systemic therapy. In MBC patients, the indication for locoregional treatments for pulmonary metastasis is controversial, whereas surgical intervention can be performed to obtain tissue for histological and molecular confirmation and occasionally for curative intent in selected MBC patients. While several retrospective studies have examined the clinical impact of pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) in MBC patients, no prospective randomized trials have been conducted. Our systematic review of PM in MBC patients found that PM might offer a survival advantage in selected MBC patients with a long disease-free interval (DFI), small number of pulmonary metastases, complete resection, and/or hormone receptor positivity. Metastases are usually detected by radiological examinations such as computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography-CT. The detectability of these radiological examinations mainly depends on tumor size (size-dependent manner). By contrast, the amount of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) released by apoptotic or necrotic tumor cells depends on the tumor burden in the whole body, regardless of radiological detectability (dose-dependent manner). Since ctDNA assays reportedly reveal residual disease several weeks earlier than radiologic imaging does, monitoring for radiological tumor size and ctDNA concentration during the clinical course may help to inform the indication for local treatment in patients with MBC and may improve their clinical outcomes. This article reviewed the current status of PM in MBC patients with pulmonary metastasis and discussed future perspectives.

Background The optimal mode of surgery for ground-glass opacity dominant peripheral lung cancer defined with thoracic thin-section computed tomography remains unknown. Methods We conducted a single-arm confirmatory trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sublobar resection for ground-glass opacity dominant peripheral lung cancer. Lung cancer with maximum tumor diameter 2.0 cm or less and with consolidation tumor ratio 0.25 or less based on thin-section computed tomography were registered. The primary end point was 5-year relapse-free survival. The planned sample size was 330 with the expected 5-year relapse-free survival of 98%, threshold of 95%, 1-sided α of 5%, and power of 90%. The trial is registered with University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, number University Hospital Medical Information Network 000002008. Results Between May 2009 and April 2011, 333 patients were enrolled from 51 institutions. Median age was 62 years (interquartile range, 56-68), and 109 were smokers. Median maximum tumor diameter was 1.20 cm (1.00-1.54). Median maximum tumor diameter of consolidation was 0 (0.00-0.20). The primary end point, 5-year relapse-free survival, was estimated on 314 patients who underwent sublobar resection. Operative modes were 258 wide wedge resections and 56 segmentectomies. Median pathological surgical margin was 15 mm (0-55). The 5-year relapse-free survival was 99.7% (90% confidence interval, 98.3-99.9), which met the primary end point. There was no local relapse. Grade 3 or higher postoperative complications based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Effect v3.0 were observed in 17 patients (5.4%), without any grade 4 or 5. Conclusions Sublobar resection with enough surgical margin offered sufficient local control and relapse-free survival for lung cancer clinically resectable N0 staged by computed tomography with 3 or fewer peripheral lesions 2.0 cm or less amenable to sublobar resection and with a consolidation tumor ratio of 0.25 or less.

Introduction Data regarding the pre-treatment intertumor heterogeneity of potential biomarkers in advanced-stage lung cancers is limited. A finding of such heterogeneity between primary and metastatic lesions would prove valuable to determine if a metastatic lesion can be a surrogate for the primary tumor, as more biomarkers will likely be used in the future to inform treatment decisions. Methods We performed RNA sequencing to analyze intertumor heterogeneity in 30 specimens (primary tumors, intrathoracic, and extrathoracic metastatic lesions) obtained from five treatment-naive lung cancer patients. Results The global unsupervised clustering analysis showed that the lesions clustered at the individual patient level rather than on the metastatic sites, suggesting that the characteristics of specific tumor cells have a greater impact on the gene expression signature than the microenvironment in which the metastasis develops. The mutational and transcriptional data highlight the presence of intertumor heterogeneity showing that the primary tumors are usually distinct from metastatic lesions. Through a comparison between metastatic lesions and the primary tumors, we observed that pathways related to cell proliferation were upregulated, whereas immune-related pathways were downregulated in metastatic lesions. Conclusion These data not only provide insight into the evolution of lung cancers, but also imply possibilities and limitations of biomarker-based treatment in lung cancers.

Pulmonary ground-glass nodules (GGNs) are hazy radiological findings on computed tomography (CT). GGNs are detected more often in never-smokers. Retrospective and prospective studies have revealed that approximately 20% of pure GGNs and 40% of part-solid GGNs gradually grow or increase their solid components, whereas others remain stable for years. Most persistent or growing GGNs are lung adenocarcinomas or their preinvasive lesions. To distinguish GGNs with growth from those without growth, GGNs should be followed for at least 5 years. Lesion size and smoking history are predictors of GGN growth. Genetic analyses of resected GGNs have suggested that EGFR mutations are also predictors for growth but a subset of KRAS- or BRAF-mutated GGNs may undergo spontaneous regression because the frequencies of KRAS or BRAF mutations decrease with the advance of pathological invasiveness. Although lobectomy is the standard surgical procedure for lung cancer, limited surgery such as wedge resection or segmentectomy for lung cancers ≤2 cm with consolidation/tumor ratio ≤0.25 can be a viable alternative based on the recent clinical trial. Further genetic analyses and clinical trials can contribute to elucidation of the biological aspects of preinvasive adenocarcinoma and the development of less invasive management strategies for patients with GGNs.

Objectives We determined the central nervous system (CNS) efficacy of alectinib by calculating time to CNS progression and cumulative incidence rates (CIRs) of CNS progression, non-CNS progression and death in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) enrolled in the J-ALEX phase III study. Materials and methods Japanese patients aged ≥20 years with ALK-positive NSCLC who were ALK inhibitor-naive and chemotherapy-naive, or who had received one previous chemotherapy regimen, were enrolled. Patients with treated or untreated asymptomatic CNS metastases were eligible. Treatment comprised oral alectinib 300 mg twice daily or crizotinib 250 mg twice daily until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, death or withdrawal. Imaging scans (computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging) were taken at baseline and at regular intervals throughout the study. The CIRs for CNS progression, non-CNS progression and death were calculated for patients with and without baseline CNS metastases using a competing risks method. Results The hazard ratio for time to CNS progression in patients with and without baseline CNS metastases was 0.51 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.16–1.64; P = 0.2502) and 0.19 (95% CI: 0.07–0.53; P = 0.0004), respectively. The CIRs of CNS progression and non-CNS progression were lower in the alectinib group than in the crizotinib group at all time points. The 1-year CIRs of CNS progression were 16.8% and 5.9% with crizotinib and alectinib, respectively, and the 1-year CIRs of non-CNS progression were 38.4% and 17.5%, respectively. Comparable findings were obtained in patients with or without baseline CNS metastases. Conclusion Alectinib appears to avert the progression of CNS metastases in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC and baseline CNS metastases, and to prevent the development of new CNS lesions in patients without baseline CNS disease.

Traditionally, marked tumor shrinkage has been assumed to portend better outcome. We investigated whether depth of tumor response was associated with improved survival outcomes in advanced EGFR-mutant NCLC.Individual patient data from randomized trials (EURTAC, IPASS, ENSURE, LUX-Lung 3, and LUX-Lung 6) were used. The association of depth of response with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival was examined using landmark analyses. Depth of response based on radiologic assessments at 6 weeks and 12 weeks was calculated as the relative changes in the sum of the longest diameters of the target lesions from baseline.Of 1081 evaluable patients at 6 weeks with no disease progression, 71.2% achieved Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors response. Using a landmark analysis, EGFR-TKI was more effective than chemotherapy (PFS hazard ratio = 0.36, p.0001); and was associated with greater mean tumor shrinkage than chemotherapy (35.1% versus 18.5%, p.0001). However, there was no significant difference in the relative PFS benefit between treatment groups across the entire spectrum of tumor shrinkage (p = .18 for test of interaction between treatment and continuously measured depth of response). Depth of response at 6 weeks was not associated with PFS when adjusted for treatment effect (hazard ratio = 0.96, p = .78). Similar results were obtained for 12-week landmark analysis and for OS outcome.The PFS advantage of EGFR-TKI over chemotherapy in advanced EGFR mutant NCLC is not explained by depth of response at 6 or 12 weeks. It should not be used as a surrogate of benefit in future trials or routine clinical decision making.

Background Central nervous system (CNS) metastases are common in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Osimertinib has shown systemic efficacy in patients with CNS metastases, and early clinical evidence shows efficacy in the CNS. To evaluate osimertinib activity further, we present a pre-specified subgroup analysis of CNS response using pooled data from two phase II studies: AURA extension (NCT01802632) and AURA2 (NCT02094261). Patients and methods Patients with T790M-positive advanced NSCLC, who had progressed following prior epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment, received osimertinib 80 mg od (n = 411). Patients with stable, asymptomatic CNS metastases were eligible for enrolment; prior CNS treatment was allowed. Patients with ≥1 measurable CNS lesion (per RECIST 1.1) on baseline brain scan by blinded independent central neuroradiology review (BICR) were included in the evaluable for CNS response set (cEFR). The primary outcome for this CNS analysis was CNS objective response rate (ORR) by BICR; secondary outcomes included CNS duration of response, disease control rate (DCR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results Of 128 patients with CNS metastases on baseline brain scans, 50 were included in the cEFR. Confirmed CNS ORR and DCR were 54% [27/50; 95% confidence interval (CI) 39–68] and 92% (46/50; 95% CI 81–98), respectively. CNS response was observed regardless of prior radiotherapy to the brain. Median CNS duration of response (22% maturity) was not reached (range, 1–15 months); at 9 months, 75% (95% CI 53–88) of patients were estimated to remain in response. Median follow-up for CNS PFS was 11 months; median CNS PFS was not reached (95% CI, 7, not calculable). The safety profile observed in the cEFR was consistent with the overall patient population. Conclusions Osimertinib demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy against CNS metastases, with a high DCR, encouraging ORR, and safety profile consistent with that reported previously. ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01802632; NCT02094261

Background In patients (pts) with non-metastatic NSCLC, surgery has curative potential but 30-80% who undergo resection experience recurrence. Neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemo is recommended for pts with high recurrence risk; however, benefits are modest and pathological complete response (pCR) with neoadjuvant chemo is low. Although immunotherapy targeting the PD-1 pathway has shown survival benefits in metastatic NSCLC, phase 3 trial results in resectable disease are yet to be reported. Recently, neoadjuvant NIVO, alone or in combination with chemo, has shown encouraging pCR rates in single-arm phase 2 studies. Here, we report the final analysis of one of the primary endpoints, pCR, of CheckMate 816 (NCT02998528)-a randomized, phase 3, open-label study evaluating NIVO + chemo vs chemo as neoadjuvant tx for resectable NSCLC. Methods Adults with clinical stage IB (≥ 4 cm)-IIIA (per AJCC 7th ed), resectable NSCLC, ECOG PS 0-1, and no known EGFR/ALK alterations were randomized to either NIVO 360 mg + platinum-doublet chemo Q3W or chemo Q3W for 3 cycles, followed by surgery. Stratification was by disease stage (IB/II vs IIIA), PD-L1 (≥ 1% or < 1%), and sex. pCR by blinded independent pathological review (BIPR) and event-free survival by blinded independent central review (BICR) are the primary endpoints. pCR was defined as 0% viable tumor cells in resected lung and lymph nodes; pts who did not undergo surgery were counted as non-responders. Overall survival, major pathological response (MPR; ≤ 10% viable tumor in both lung and lymph nodes) per BIPR, and time to death or distant metastases are secondary endpoints. Key exploratory endpoints are objective response rate (ORR) per BICR and potential predictive biomarkers including PD-L1 and tumor mutational burden (TMB). Results Baseline characteristics were balanced between arms (n = 179 each). Neoadjuvant NIVO + chemo significantly increased pCR rates vs chemo in the intent-to-treat population (ITT) (24.0% vs 2.2%; odds ratio 13.94 [99% CI 3.49-55.75]; P < 0.0001). Improvement in pCR with NIVO + chemo vs chemo was consistent across key subgroups including disease stage (IB/II [26.2% vs 4.8%]; ≥ IIIA [23.0% vs 0.9%]), PD-L1 (< 1% [16.7% vs 2.6%]; ≥ 1% [32.6% vs 2.2%]), and TMB (low [22.4% vs 1.9%]; high [30.8% vs 2.7%]). NIVO + chemo also improved MPR rates vs chemo in the ITT (36.9% vs 8.9%), as well as ORR (53.6% vs 37.4%) and radiographic down-staging rates (30.7% vs 23.5%). Definitive surgery occurred for 83.2% of pts treated with NIVO + chemo and 75.4% with chemo; surgery was cancelled rarely due to AEs (2 pts/arm) and due to disease progression in 12 and 17 pts, respectively. Grade 3-4 tx-related AEs and grade 3-4 surgery-related AEs were reported in 33.5% vs 36.9% and 11.4% vs 14.8% of pts in the NIVO + chemo vs chemo arms, respectively. Conclusions CheckMate 816 met its first primary endpoint with a statistically significant improvement in pCR with neoadjuvant NIVO + chemo vs chemo alone per independent review. The safety profile of NIVO + chemo was consistent with the known profile of this combination regimen, and the addition of NIVO did not decrease the ability to perform surgery. CheckMate 816 is the first positive phase 3 trial demonstrating a significant improvement in pathologic response with neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemo in resectable NSCLC. Citation Format: Patrick M. Forde, Jonathan Spicer, Shun Lu, Mariano Provencio, Tetsuya Mitsudomi, Mark M. Awad, Enriqueta Felip, Stephen Broderick, Julie Brahmer, Scott J. Swanson, Keith Kerr, Changli Wang, Gene B. Saylors, Fumihiro Tanaka, Hiroyuki Ito, Ke-Neng Chen, Cecile Dorange, Junliang Cai, Joseph Fiore, Nicholas Girard. Nivolumab (NIVO) + platinum-doublet chemotherapy (chemo) vs chemo as neoadjuvant treatment (tx) for resectable (IB-IIIA) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the phase 3 CheckMate 816 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT003.

The prognostic impact of tumor cavitation is unclear in patients with early-stage primary lung cancer. The aim of the present study was to examine the clinicopathological features and prognoses of patients with pathological stage I-IIA (p-stage I-IIA) primary lung cancers harboring tumor cavitation. This study was conducted according to the eighth edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer.We examined 602 patients with p-stage I-IIA primary lung cancer out of 890 patients who underwent pulmonary resection from January 2007 through March 2014 and searched for the presence of tumor cavitation, which is defined as the presence of air space within the primary tumor.A total of 59 out of the 602 patients had tumor cavitation (10%). Compared with patients without tumor cavitation, those with tumor cavitation had a significantly higher frequency of the following characteristics: high serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level (≥5ng/ml, p=0.027), interstitial pneumonia (p=0.0001), high SUVmax value on FDG-PET scan (≥4.2, p=0.023), tumors located in the lower lobe (p=0.024), large tumor size (3cm, p=0.002), vascular invasion (66% vs 17%, p0.0001) and non-adenocarcinoma histology (p=0.025). The overall survival period of patients with tumor cavitation was significantly shorter than that of patients without tumor cavitation (log-rank test: p0.0001, 5-year OS rate: 56% vs 81%). Tumor cavitation was found to be an independent and significant factor associated with poor prognosis in the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio: 1.76, 95% confidence interval: 1.02-3.10, p=0.042).Tumor cavitation is an independent factor for poor prognosis in patients with resected p-stage I-IIA primary lung cancer. Based on our analyses, patients with tumor cavitation should be regarded as a separate cohort that requires more intensive follow-up.

Positive pleural lavage cytology (PLC) has been reported to have a negative prognostic impact in patients with surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, positive PLC does not upgrade the stage according to the 7th edition of TNM classification for lung cancer. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the prognostic impact of positive PLC in patients with NSCLC and to clarify its contribution to TNM classification.Seven hundred fifty-four patients who underwent surgical resection of NSCLC from January 2007 through December 2013 were retrospectively studied. PLC was performed using 50ml of saline immediately after thoracotomy.Thirty-eight of the 754 patients were positive for PLC (5.1%). The overall survival (OS) of patients with positive PLC was significantly shorter than that of those with negative PLC (P=0.007, log-rank test). In multivariate analyses of OS, positive PLC was a significant independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio=2.21, 95% confidence interval: 1.21-4.04, P=0.009). The OS of patients with positive PLC was significantly shorter than that of those with negative PLC and pT1 (P0.0001) or negative PLC and pT2 (P0.0001) and almost overlapped with that of those with negative PLC and pT3 disease (P=0.601).Positive PLC is an independent prognostic factor in patients with resected NSCLC. Based on our analyses, we propose that patients with positive PLC be staged as pT3.

Currently, there is no established guidance on how to process and evaluate resected lung cancer specimens after neoadjuvant therapy in the setting of clinical trials and clinical practice. There is also a lack of precise definitions on the degree of pathologic response, including major pathologic response or complete pathologic response. For other cancers such as osteosarcoma and colorectal, breast, and esophageal carcinomas, there have been multiple studies investigating pathologic assessment of the effects of neoadjuvant therapy, including some detailed recommendations on how to handle these specimens. A comprehensive mapping approach to gross and histologic processing of osteosarcomas after induction therapy has been used for over 40 years. The purpose of this article is to outline detailed recommendations on how to process lung cancer resection specimens and to define pathologic response, including major pathologic response or complete pathologic response after neoadjuvant therapy. A standardized approach is recommended to assess the percentages of (1) viable tumor, (2) necrosis, and (3) stroma (including inflammation and fibrosis) with a total adding up to 100%. This is recommended for all systemic therapies, including chemotherapy, chemoradiation, molecular-targeted therapy, immunotherapy, or any future novel therapies yet to be discovered, whether administered alone or in combination. Specific issues may differ for certain therapies such as immunotherapy, but the grossing process should be similar, and the histologic evaluation should contain these basic elements. Standard pathologic response assessment should allow for comparisons between different therapies and correlations with disease-free survival and overall survival in ongoing and future trials. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer has an effort to collect such data from existing and future clinical trials. These recommendations are intended as guidance for clinical trials, although it is hoped they can be viewed as suggestion for good clinical practice outside of clinical trials, to improve consistency of pathologic assessment of treatment response.

Molecular targeted therapies have significantly improved the treatment outcome of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring driver gene mutations such as receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK). However, the brain is a frequent site of recurrence, and it significantly deteriorates the prognosis of these patients. Treatment strategies include surgical resection, whole-brain radiation therapy, stereotactic radiotherapy, and drug therapy depending on patient condition. First-generation EGFR/ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) demonstrates only limited efficacy for intracranial lesions probably because of low penetration through the blood-brain barrier (BBB). However, newly developed TKIs with improved penetration such as osimertinib for EGFR and alectinib, ceritinib, brigatinib, or lorlatinib for ALK have demonstrated significant intracranial activity that should contribute to improved overall survival. Whole-brain radiation therapy used to be a standard of care that confers alleviation of symptom and modest survival benefit. However, it potentially causes neurological and cognitive deficits as a chronic toxicity. With the prolonged survival owing to newer generation drugs, this toxicity is becoming more relevant. Stereotactic radiotherapy is considered when there are three or fewer lesions, and the lesions are

The J-ALEX study compared the efficacy and safety of alectinib with crizotinib in Japanese patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Superiority in independent review facility (IRF)-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) was demonstrated for alectinib at the second pre-planned interim PFS analysis (data cutoff: December 3, 2015; hazard ratio [HR] 0.34, 99.7 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.17-0.71, P0.0001). We report final PFS data and the second pre-planned interim analysis of overall survival (OS) and safety (data cutoff: June 30, 2018).Patients aged ≥20 years who were ALK inhibitor-naïve and chemotherapy-naïve, or had received one prior chemotherapy regimen, were randomized to receive alectinib 300 mg (n = 103) or crizotinib 250 mg (n = 104) twice daily. The primary end point was IRF-assessed PFS. Secondary end points included OS and safety. All patients entered survival follow-up in July 2018.Median follow-up was 42.4 months for alectinib and 42.2 months for crizotinib. Sustained improvement in IRF-assessed PFS with alectinib was shown (HR 0.37, 95 % CI: 0.26-0.52; median PFS 34.1 months vs 10.2 months crizotinib). At the second interim OS analysis, superiority of alectinib to crizotinib could not be concluded (stratified HR 0.80, 99.8799 % CI: 0.35-1.82, stratified log-rank P = 0.3860; median OS not reached alectinib vs 43.7 months crizotinib). Fewer alectinib-treated patients experienced grade ≥3 adverse events (36.9 % vs 60.6 % crizotinib).At the final PFS analysis, alectinib continued to demonstrate superiority in IRF-assessed PFS versus crizotinib in ALK-inhibitor-naïve ALK-positive NSCLC, with a favorable safety profile. OS follow-up continues.

Background A total of 75% of patients with Sjögren’s syndrome are complicated with pulmonary lesions, of which 12% are lymphoma and 6% are amyloid nodules; the coexistence of both is considered to be rare. Case presentation A 67-year-old female with Sjögren’s syndrome presented with multiple pulmonary nodules on chest computed tomography. Since a definitive diagnosis by transbronchial biopsy was not obtained, wedge resection of the nodules was performed. Pathologic diagnosis revealed eosinophilic deposition that stained positive with Congo red. In addition, lymphoepithelial lesions and lymphocytic infiltration were observed. Lymphocytes with monoclonal proliferation predominantly had κ chain. Based on these findings, the nodules were diagnosed as mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma with amyloid deposition. Conclusions The combination of these diseases is very rare, and this is the sixth resected case to the best of our knowledge.

8503 Background: CheckMate 816 (NCT02998528) is a randomized phase 3 study of neoadjuvant NIVO + chemo vs chemo in resectable NSCLC. The study met its first primary endpoint, demonstrating significantly improved pathological complete response (pCR) with neoadjuvant NIVO + chemo. Here we report key surgical outcomes from the study. Methods: Adults with stage IB (≥ 4 cm)–IIIA (per AJCC 7th ed) resectable NSCLC, ECOG PS ≤ 1, and no known EGFR/ ALK alterations were randomized to NIVO 360 mg + platinum-doublet chemo Q3W or chemo Q3W for 3 cycles (n = 179 each). Definitive surgery was to be performed within 6 weeks of treatment. Primary endpoints are pCR (defined as 0% viable tumor cells in lung and lymph nodes) and event-free survival; both are evaluated by blinded independent review. Feasibility of surgery and surgery-related adverse events (AEs) are exploratory endpoints. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between arms; 64% of patients (pts) were stage IIIA. Definitive surgery rates were 83% with NIVO + chemo (n = 149) vs 75% with chemo (n = 135). Reasons for cancelled surgery were disease progression (12 and 17 pts, respectively), AEs (2 pts/arm), or other scenarios (14 and 19 pts, respectively; including pt refusal, unresectability, poor lung function). Minimally invasive surgery rates were 30% and 22%, and conversion from minimally invasive to open surgery rates were 11% and 16% for NIVO + chemo and chemo, respectively. Lobectomy was performed in 77% vs 61% of pts, and pneumonectomy in 17% and 25% for NIVO + chemo vs chemo, respectively. AEs were responsible for delays of surgery in 6 pts in the NIVO + chemo arm and 9 pts in the chemo arm. An R0 resection was achieved in 83% vs 78% of pts and median residual viable tumor (RVT) cells in the primary tumor bed were 10% vs 74% for NIVO + chemo vs chemo. There was no increase in median (Q1, Q3) duration of surgery and length of hospitalization between NIVO + chemo vs chemo (184 [130, 252] vs 217 [150, 283] min; and 10.0 [7, 14] vs 10.0 [7, 14] days, respectively). Any-grade and grade 3–4 surgery-related AEs were reported in 41% vs 47% and 11% vs 15% of the NIVO + chemo vs chemo arms, respectively. Grade 5 surgery-related AEs were reported in 2 vs 0 pts in the NIVO + chemo vs chemo arms; 0 vs 3 pts died due to treatment-related AEs, respectively. Conclusions: In CheckMate 816, neoadjuvant NIVO + chemo did not impede the feasibility and timing of surgery, nor the extent or completeness of resection vs chemo alone; treatment was tolerable and did not increase surgical complications. NIVO + chemo led to increased depth of pathological response. The surgical outcome data from CheckMate 816 along with significant improvement in pCR support NIVO + chemo as a potential neoadjuvant option for patients with stage IB to IIIA resectable NSCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT02998528.

Type 3 NETs are reported to metastasize to other organs or lymph nodes; however, there are few reports of gastric NETs causing isolated pulmonary metastasis. We report a rare case of primary gastric neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) with lung metastasis. The patient presented with multiple gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs) and a solid nodule in the S1 + 2 of the left lung. Endoscopic mucosal resection of the stomach and a left upper lobectomy of the lung were successfully performed. The histopathological findings of the gastric SMTs and lung tumor revealed type 3 gastric NETs and a metastatic pulmonary tumor, although TTF-1 is positive in the stomach and the lung. In this time, we reported a rare case of a metastatic pulmonary tumor from gastric type 3 NETs. In addition, we also realized the limitations of immunohistochemistry in identifying the site of origin for NETs and the need to rely on morphologic and clinical features.