Search

OBJECTIVES Pediatric patients with chronic musculoskeletal conditions such as idiopathic scoliosis awaiting surgical correction can experience pain that interferes with their daily functioning. Reports of this interference are commonly gathered from patients through the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference Scale and through parent-proxy scores. However, the child and parent/caregiver reports vary. To provide appropriate treatment for young patients with pain, the nature of the discrepancies and under which circumstances the reports differ needs to be understood. This report offers new information on the level of concordance among parent and child report of pain interference within this patient population, and which parent and child characteristics may influence concordance rates. METHODS Youth (age=10 to 17 y) with a history of musculoskeletal disorders, including idiopathic scoliosis, under consideration for surgical correction of that scoliosis and parent/caregiver dyads (n=103) completed the PROMIS Pain Interference Scale during an orthopedic presurgical visit. The current data was taken from a larger study examining postsurgical pain among patients undergoing orthopedic surgical procedures to correct scoliosis. The purpose of the current study was to measure the degree of agreement between parent and child reports of pain interference and discovery of relationships among predictors of pain interference score correspondence among dyads. RESULTS Correspondence between parent/caregiver and child reports of pain interference was modest (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.530). In total, 46% of dyads had similar pain interference scores, whereas 24% of parents reported higher pain interference in comparison to their child, the remaining 30% reported lower pain interference in relation to their child's report. Among children where discrepancies appeared, using logistic regression models, only child catastrophizing scores were associated with differences in parent and child estimation of child's pain interference scores. No parental characteristics predicted discrepancies between dyad pain interference reports. DISCUSSION Parent-proxy and child reports generally correspond, but when discrepant, 24% of parents reported higher pain interference in relationship to the child report of pain interference and 31% noted less intense pain interference than their child's pain interference. Given these results, care should be taken when interpreting parent reports of child pain interference, especially when a child reports higher degrees of pain interference.

Aim: This study evaluated the effect of an interactive, web-based educational program on parents’ opioid risk knowledge, risk perceptions, analgesic self efficacy and decision-making. Patients & methods: Totally, 64 parents from a tertiary care pediatric healthcare setting were assessed for risk understanding at baseline, immediately and 3 days after receiving the educational program. Results: Participants gained increased opioid risk knowledge, enhanced risk perceptions as well as enhanced analgesic self efficacy after program exposure. The program had no effect on parental decisions about when to give or withhold a prescribed opioid. Conclusion: The interactive web-based program improved parental knowledge about opioid risks. Program enhancements may be needed to improve pain management decisions about when it is safe to use opioids and when they should be withheld.

Summary Opioids have long held a prominent role in the management of perioperative pain in adults and children. Published reports concerning the appropriate, and inappropriate, use of these medications in pediatric patients have appeared in various publications over the last 50 years. For this document, the Society for Pediatric Anesthesia appointed a taskforce to evaluate the available literature and formulate recommendations with respect to the most salient aspects of perioperative opioid administration in children. The recommendations are graded based on the strength of the available evidence, with consensus of the experts applied for those issues where evidence is not available. The goal of the recommendations was to address the most important issues concerning opioid administration to children after surgery, including appropriate assessment of pain, monitoring of patients on opioid therapy, opioid dosing considerations, side effects of opioid treatment, strategies for opioid delivery, and assessment of analgesic efficacy. Regular updates are planned with a re‐release of guidelines every 2 years.

Objective To examine the age-specific risk of past-year substance use disorders (SUDs) associated with use and misuse of prescription opioids, stimulants, sedatives and tranquilizers. Methods The authors analyzed nationally representative data from 114,043 U.S. individuals aged 12 and older in the 2015–2016 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. For each controlled medication class, logistic regression was used to model any past-year SUD as a function of use pattern: no use or misuse, use without misuse, prescription drug misuse (PDM). Among individuals reporting PDM, logistic regression was used to model any past-year SUD as a function of PDM subtype (misuse of someone else's medication only, misuse of one's own medication only, and misuse of one's own and someone else's medication). Analyses were stratified by age group. Results Controlled medication use was associated with higher odds of any past-year SUD compared to no use in many age groups and medication classes. Compared to non-use, PDM was associated with higher odds of any past-year SUD across virtually all age groups and medication classes. Compared to misuse of one's own medication only, misuse of both someone else's and one's own medication was associated with higher odds of any past-year SUD for many age groups and medication classes among individuals reporting PDM. Conclusions Clinicians should screen all controlled medication users for PDM and SUDs. Age-specific screening may be required due to heterogeneity in the prevalence and risks of use and misuse of different medications. Determination of PDM subtype can guide interventions to prevent SUDs.

This randomized, controlled trial evaluated whether a brief educational program (ie, Scenario-Tailored Opioid Messaging Program [STOMP]) would improve parental opioid risk knowledge, perceptions, and analgesic efficacy; ensure safe opioid use decisions; and impact prescription opioid use after surgery. Parent-child dyads (n = 604) who were prescribed an opioid for short-term use were randomized to routine instruction (Control) or routine plus STOMP administered preoperatively. Baseline and follow-up surveys assessed parents' awareness and perceived seriousness of adverse opioid effects, and their analgesic efficacy. Parents' decisions to give an opioid in hypothetical scenarios and total opioid doses they gave to children at home were assessed at follow-up. Scenario-Tailored Opioid Messaging Program parents gained enhanced perceptions of opioid-related risks over time, whereas Controls did not; however, risk perceptions did not differ between groups except for addiction risk. Scenario-Tailored Opioid Messaging Program parents exhibited marginally greater self-efficacy compared to Controls (mean difference vs controls = 0.58 [95% confidence interval 0.08-1.09], P = 0.023). Scenario-Tailored Opioid Messaging Program parents had a 53% lower odds of giving an opioid in an excessive sedation scenario (odds ratio 0.47 [95% confidence interval 0.28-0.78], P = 0.003), but otherwise made similar scenario-based opioid decisions. Scenario-Tailored Opioid Messaging Program was not associated with total opioid doses administered at home. Instead, parents' analgesic efficacy and pain-relief preferences explained 7%, whereas child and surgical factors explained 22% of the variance in opioid doses. Scenario-tailored education enhanced parents' opioid risk knowledge, perceptions, and scenario-based decision-making. Although this may inform later situation-specific decision-making, our research did not demonstrate an impact on total opioid dosing, which was primarily driven by surgical and child-related factors.

OBJECTIVES Persistent or recurrent pain is common among adolescents and is associated with poor functioning. The purpose of this study was to determine whether preteens who present with pain, and higher, co-occurring psychological and somatic symptoms (PSS) are at higher risk for persistent pain than other children. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a secondary analysis of the longitudinal Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development database (version 2.0.1) that includes 11,863 children aged 9 to 12 years. We differentiated children into baseline Pain/PSS profiles using the Child Behavior Checklist assessments of pain, cognitive-fogginess, somatic symptoms, depression, and anxiety and the Sleep Disorder Survey-Children somnolence subscale. We examined whether Pain/PSS profile predicted 1-year new/persistent pain when controlled for child characteristics and intergenerational mental health factors. RESULTS Four profiles were differentiated: No Pain/Low PSS, No Pain/High PSS, Pain/Low PSS, Pain/High PSS. Trauma exposure and family symptoms were associated with increased odds of being in the higher PSS groups. Baseline symptom profile predicted 14% of the variance in new/persistent pain at 1-year. Compared with the No Pain/Low PSS group, an increased odds of 1-year new or persistent pain was found in children with No Pain/High PSS (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 1.44; [95% confidence interval: 1.14, 1.82]), Pain/Low PSS (adjusted OR: 4.69 [4.01, 5.48]) and Pain/High PSS (adjusted OR: 5.48 [4.35, 6.91]). DISCUSSION Preteen children with higher comorbid Pain/PSS symptomology were at higher risk for new or persistent pain at 1 year when controlled for important child and family characteristics. Findings support the importance of considering co-occurring symptoms when evaluating children with pain.

OBJECTIVES: Leftover prescription opioids pose risks to children and adolescents, yet many parents keep these medications in the home. Our objective in this study was to determine if providing a behavioral disposal method (ie, Nudge) with or without a Scenario-Tailored Opioid Messaging Program (STOMP) (risk-enhancement education) improves parents’ opioid-disposal behavior after their children’s use. METHODS: Parents whose children were prescribed a short course of opioids were recruited and randomly assigned to the Nudge or control groups with or without STOMP. Parents completed surveys at baseline and 7 and 14 days. Main outcomes were (1) prompt disposal (ie, immediate disposal of leftovers after use) and (2) planned retention (intention to keep leftovers). RESULTS: There were 517 parents who took part, and 93% had leftovers after use. Prompt disposal behavior was higher for parents who received both the STOMP and Nudge interventions (38.5%), Nudge alone (33.3%), or STOMP alone (31%) compared with controls (19.2%; P ≤ .02). Furthermore, the STOMP intervention independently decreased planned retention rates (5.6% vs 12.5% no STOMP; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.40 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19–0.85]). Higher risk perception lowered the odds of planned retention (aOR 0.87 [95% CI 0.79–0.96]), whereas parental past opioid misuse increased those odds (aOR 4.44 [95% CI 1.67–11.79]). CONCLUSIONS: Providing a disposal method nudged parents to dispose of their children’s leftover opioids promptly after use, whereas STOMP boosted prompt disposal and reduced planned retention. Such strategies can reduce the presence of risky leftover medications in the home and decrease the risks posed to children and adolescents.

Background One in five adolescents and emerging adults have reported prescription opioid misuse (POM), posing significant risks for opioid-related adverse outcomes. Devising prevention strategies requires a better understanding of the decisional factors underlying risky misuse behavior. This research examined the associations between past opioid use behavior, opioid risk knowledge and perceptions, and intentional POM decisions. Methods Participants aged 15–23years completed surveys assessing past prescription opioid use and misuse, opioid risk knowledge, opioid risk perceptions, and pain relief preferences (i.e., analgesic benefit vs. risk aversion preference). The outcome, Willingness to Misuse (i.e., intentional decisions to use a prescription opioid in a non–compliant manner) was measured using hypothetical pain decision scenarios. Results Surveys were completed by 972 adolescents and young adults. In total, 44% had taken a prescription opioid and 32% of these reported past POM. Willingness to Misuse was significantly associated with lower opioid misuse risk perceptions (β = .75 [95% CI .66–.86]) and past opioid misuse (β = 1.81 [95% CI 1.13–2.91]) but not simple risk knowledge (β = .81 [95% CI .58–1.11]. The probability of future misuse was highest for those who reported past opioid misuse and had low risk perceptions (58.7% [95% CI 51.3–65.8]) and high pain relief preferences (53.4% [95% CI 45.3%–61.3%]). Conclusions Findings suggest that simple knowledge of prescription opioid risks is insufficient to curtail misuse among adolescents and emerging adults. Rather, it may be important to heighten opioid risk perceptions and strengthen opioid risk aversion values when prescribing opioid analgesics to better prevent future misuse in this high risk population.

Background Pain location and widespread pain are important but underexamined dimensions of paediatric pain. Body map tools to assess pain location in youth have been used for several decades, but few studies have established reliability and validity of these measures. The purpose of this study was to explore the reliability and validity of a pain body map among youth with orthopaedic conditions before surgery. Method Youth ages 10-17 years completed the body map and other self-reported outcomes at their preoperative clinic visit and at their day of surgery. Results Most (91.7%) youth had small discrepancy between body map scores at preoperative clinic visit (baseline) and day of surgery (second assessment), and site-to-site agreement ranged from 78% to 98%. Those with back and lower extremity diagnoses had high correspondence between body map sites and diagnostic sites. Body map scores and widespread pain were associated with other dimensions of pain, as well as other patient-reported outcomes. Higher pain intensity and widespread pain predicted greater discrepancy between body map scores. Conclusions These results support the use of body map tools in further research examining widespread pain among youth by demonstrating adequate reliability, descriptive validity and associative validity. Significance These results contribute to the limited information regarding psychometric properties of paediatric pain body maps, provide novel information about widespread pain among youth undergoing orthopaedic surgeries, and pave the way for improved assessment and treatment of paediatric pain.

Background Preoperative pain predicts persistent pain after spine fusion, yet little is understood about the nature of that pain, related symptoms, and how these symptoms relate to postoperative pain outcomes. This prospective study examined children's baseline pain and symptom profiles and the association between a high symptom profile and postoperative outcomes. Methods Seventy children (aged 10-17 years) scheduled for correction of idiopathic scoliosis completed pain and symptom surveys during their preoperative visit (ie, pain intensity [0-10 numeric rating scores], a pediatric version of the 2011 fibromyalgia survey criteria [including pain locations and symptom severity scale], neuropathic pain symptoms [painDETECT], and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement System measures of fatigue, depression, function, pain interference, and pain catastrophizing). Pain intensity and total analgesic use were recorded daily postoperatively and for 2 weeks after discharge. A 2-step cluster analysis differentiated a high and low pain and symptom profile at baseline, and a multivariate main effects regression model examined the association between pain profile and posthospital discharge pain and analgesic outcomes. Results The cluster analysis differentiated 2 groups of children well characterized by their baseline symptom reporting. Thirty percent (95% confidence interval [CI], 20.2%-41.8%) had a high symptom profile with higher depression, fatigue, pain interference, a pediatric version of the fibromyalgia survey criteria symptoms, neuropathic pain, and catastrophizing. Girls were more likely than boys to be clustered in the high symptom profile (odds ratio [OR], 5.76 [95% CI, 1.20-27.58]; P = .022) as were those with preoperative pain lasting >3 months (OR, 3.42 [95% CI, 1.21-9.70]; P = .018). Adjusting for sex, age, and total in-hospital opioid consumption, high cluster membership was independently associated with higher self-reported pain after discharge (mean difference +1.13 point [97.5% CI, 0.09-2.17]; P = .015). Children in the high symptom cluster were more likely to report ongoing opioid use at 2 weeks compared with the low symptom group (87% vs 50%; OR, 6.5 [95% CI, 1.30-33.03]; P = .015). At 6 months, high symptom cluster membership was associated with higher pain intensity, higher pain interference, and ongoing analgesic use (P ≤ .018). Conclusions A behavioral pain vulnerable profile was present preoperatively in 30% of children with idiopathic scoliosis and was independently associated with poorer and potentially long-lasting pain outcomes after spine fusion in this setting. This high symptom profile is similar to that described in children and adults with chronic and centralized pain disorders and was more prevalent in girls and those with long-standing pain. Further study is needed to elucidate the potential mechanisms behind our observations.

Nearly 20% of anesthesia-related pediatric cardiac arrests (CAs) occur during emergence or recovery. The aims of this case series were to use the Wake Up Safe database to describe the following: (1) the nature of pediatric postanesthesia care unit (PACU) CA and subsequent outcomes and (2) factors associated with harm after pediatric PACU CA.Pediatric CAs in the PACU were identified from the Wake Up Safe Pediatric Anesthesia Quality Improvement Initiative, a multicenter registry of adverse events in pediatric anesthesia. Demographics, underlying conditions, cause of CA, and outcomes were extracted. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize data and to assess risk of harm in those suffering CA.A total of 26 CA events were included: 67% in children5 years, and 30% in infants (1 year); 18 (69%) were deemed likely or almost certainly preventable. All preventable CAs were respiratory in nature and most (67%) had purported root causes that included provider judgment or inexperience, inadequate supervision, and competing priorities. CAs of cardiac origin were associated with increased level of harm (temporary or greater), whereas those of respiratory origin were associated more often with no harm.PACU CA events are rare and generally survivable, with better outcomes for respiratory-based events, but most were deemed preventable, suggesting a need for further vigilance in the early postoperative period. Maintenance of monitoring during patient transport to PACU and continuing care by anesthesia care providers until emergence from anesthesia may further reduce the preventable arrest rate. The root cause analyses conducted by individual institutions reporting these data to the Wake Up Safe provided only limited insight, so multicenter collaborative approaches may allow for greater insight into effective CA-prevention strategies.

SummaryBackground Posterior spinal fusion to correct idiopathic scoliosis is associated with severe postoperative pain. Intrathecal morphine is commonly used for analgesia after adolescent posterior spinal fusion; however, anticipating and managing the increase in pain scores after resolution of analgesic effect of intrathecal morphine analgesia is challenging. In 2014, we developed a clinical protocol detailing both the administration of intrathecal morphine intraoperatively and the transition to routine, scheduled oral analgesics at 18 h postoperatively. The goal of our study was to examine the efficacy of our intrathecal morphine protocol vs epidural hydromorphone for postoperative analgesia after posterior spinal fusion. Methods Following IRB approval, we retrospectively identified developmentally intact children of ages 10–20 years in our electronic database with a diagnosis of idiopathic scoliosis who had undergone elective posterior spinal fusion surgery from June 2014 to April 2015. For the intrathecal morphine group, intrathecal morphine was administered in a dose of 12 μg·kg−1 (max 1000 μg) prior to incision. Postoperatively, all children in the intrathecal morphine group had an order to receive oral oxycodone (0.1 mg·kg−1, max 5 mg) starting at 18 h postintrathecal morphine injection. For the epidural hydromorphone group, catheters were placed by the surgeon and bolused with 5 μg·kg−1 hydromorphone (max 200 μg) and 1 μg·kg−1 fentanyl (max 50 μg), followed by a continuous infusion of 40–60 μg·h−1, and patient-controlled bolus doses of 5 μg with a lockout interval of 30 min. All patients in both groups had postoperative orders for acetaminophen, diazepam, and ketorolac. Results During the study time period, 20 patients received intrathecal morphine and were successfully matched with 20 patients who received epidural hydromorphone. All patients in the intrathecal morphine group were transitioned to oral analgesics on the first postoperative day, without need for intravenous opioids after discharge from the postanesthesia care unit. Compared to the epidural hydromorphone group, the intrathecal morphine group reported lower pain scores in the postanesthesia care unit (difference in means −4.26 [95% CI −6.56, −1.96], P = 0.001) and first 8 h after surgery (difference in means −1.88 [95% CI −3.84, 0.082, P = 0.060) and higher pain scores on the 2nd postoperative day (difference in means 1.60 [95% CI 0.10, 3.10], P = 0.037). The documented time to ambulation and time of Foley catheter removal were statistically earlier in the intrathecal morphine group, and the hospital length of stay was significantly shorter (3.0 ± 0.5 days vs 3.5 ± 0.7 days; P = 0.03). Adverse events did not significantly differ between the groups. Conclusion The efficacy of intraoperative intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia in the posterior spinal fusion patient population has been shown previously; however, the pain and analgesic trajectory, including transition to other analgesics, has not previously been studied. Our findings suggest that for many patients, use of intrathecal morphine in addition to routine administration of nonopioid medications facilitates direct transition to oral analgesics in the early postoperative period and earlier routine ambulation and discharge of posterior spinal fusion patients.

Summary Background Children with symptoms of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) appear to be at risk for perioperative respiratory events (PRAE). Furthermore, these children may be more sensitive to the respiratory-depressant effects of opioids compared with children without SDB. Aims The aim of this prospective observational study was to confirm that otherwise healthy children with symptoms of SDB are at greater risk for PRAE compared with children with no symptoms and to determine if these children are also at increased risk for postoperative opioid-related adverse events (ORAE). Methods Six hundred and seventy-eight parents of children scheduled for surgery completed the Snoring, Trouble Breathing, and Un-Refreshed (STBUR) questionnaire preoperatively. Data regarding the incidence of PRAE were collected prospectively. Postoperative pulse oximetry desaturation alarm events were downloaded from the institutional secondary alarm notification system. Results Children with symptoms of SDB per STBUR (≥3 symptoms) had a two-fold increased likelihood of PRAE compared with children without SDB (52.8% vs 27.9% respectively, LR+ = 2.00, 95% CI = 1.60–2.49, P = 0.0001). A subset analysis of children undergoing airway procedures requiring hospital admittance (n = 179) showed that those with SDB were given the same postoperative opioid doses as children without SDB. However, children with SDB symptoms generated a greater number of postoperative oxygen desaturation alarms (14.14 ± 29.3 vs 7.12 ± 13.2, mean difference = 7.02, 95% CI = 0.39–13.64, P = 0.038) and more frequently required escalation of care (15.3% vs 7.1%, LR+ = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.22–2.16, P = 0.001) compared with children with no SDB symptoms. Conclusions Children presenting for surgery with SDB symptoms are at increased risk for PRAE. Children undergoing airway-related procedures also appear to be at increased risk for ORAE. Furthermore, regardless of the preoperative assessment of risk using the STBUR questionnaire, children received the same doses of opioids postoperatively. Given the increased incidence of postoperative oxygen desaturations among children with SDB symptoms, it would seem prudent to consider titration of opioid doses according to identified risk.

Tonsillectomy is a common and painful procedure often indicated for children with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who are at risk for opioid-related toxicity. Whether parents whose children have OSA understand the risks of opioids is unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine whether parents whose children have OSA have greater opioid risk understanding and would be less likely to give an opioid to a child exhibiting oversedation compared to parents whose children do not have OSA. The study design was a secondary analysis of a prospective observational study. The study was conducted in a large academic, tertiary care children's hospital in the Midwest. 224 parents whose children with or without OSA underwent tonsillectomy with/without adenoidectomy were included. Parents were assessed for opioid adverse event understanding and then made decisions to give/withhold opioids for a child exhibiting adverse effects. After discharge, parents recorded all opioid doses they gave their child. There were no differences in opioid understanding between OSA and non-OSA groups, and nearly half in both would give an opioid to the child exhibiting oversedation. Similar amounts of opioids were given at home. OSA did not predict parents' opioid decisions; however, around-the-clock instruction predicted greater opioid use at home. Parents whose children had OSA had a similar understanding of opioid-related oversedation compared to other parents, and half would give a prescribed opioid when signs of oversedation were present, suggesting a need for improved understanding and recognition of this sign of toxicity, and of what to do should this symptom present.

Previous research on SDB in children has focus edprimarily on OSA, whereas there is an increasing body of evidence to suggest that children with a spectrum of SDB symptoms may be at risk for perioperative and postoperative adverse events. To this end, it is imperative that these children are identified before surgery so that anesthesia and postoperative pain management plans can be optimized to mitigate risk. Although PSG remains the gold standard as a means to screen for SDB preoperatively,there are now clinically valid tools that can be used as part of the preanesthetic interview to identify children at risk. However, although recent work suggests that implementation of such screening tools may be important in identifying at-risk children and reducing perioperative adverse events through changes in anesthetic management, there is still much to be done with respect to changing the culture of standard postoperative opioid dosing. Perianesthesia nurses are thus in a unique position to help encourage a culture in which SDB in children is recognized asa significant risk for both perioperative and potentially deadly postoperative sequelae.

BACKGROUND Persistent postoperative pain is a significant problem for many children, particularly for those undergoing major surgery such as posterior spine fusion. More than two-thirds report persistent pain after spine fusion, yet factors that may contribute to poorer outcomes remain poorly understood. AIMS This prospective, longitudinal study examined how psychologic and somatic symptoms cluster together in children aged 10-17 years with idiopathic scoliosis, and tested the hypothesis that a higher psychological and somatic symptom cluster would predict worse pain outcomes 1 year after fusion. METHODS Otherwise healthy children with idiopathic scoliosis completed preoperative surveys measuring recent pain intensity, pain location(s), somatic symptom severity, painDETECT (neuropathic-type pain symptoms), pain interference, fatigue, depression, anxiety, and pain catastrophizing. Pain outcome data were collected during hospitalization, and at 1 year after surgery. RESULTS Ninety-five children completed baseline surveys and a cluster analysis differentiated 28 (30%) with a high symptom profile that included; higher depression, fatigue, pain interference, catastrophizing, and painDETECT scores. High symptom cluster membership independently predicted higher pain interference at 1 year (β 9.92 [95% CI 6.63, 13.2], P

Self-report is often represented as "the gold standard" in assessment of pain intensity in children. We evaluate arguments for and against this claim and consider its implications for pain management.Those in the support of the proposition argue that, when children are able to self-report, treatment decisions should be made based on these scores in line with current evidence-based recommendations. Pain is a subjective phenomenon and can be assessed only via self-report. Treating self-report scores as the gold standard is the only valid way for health care professionals to decide on appropriate treatment.Those against the proposition contend that reliance on self-reported pain scores for analgesic treatment decisions is inappropriate as they oversimplify the pain experience, yield only marginal information on which to base treatment decisions, and potentially place children at significant risk for adverse events. Self-reports of pain intensity sometimes contradict well-founded estimates based on other evidence. Wide variation between children in the meaning of pain scores precludes easy interpretation.We conclude that self-report, when available, can be considered a primary source of evidence about pain intensity. However, it cannot be treated as an unquestioned gold standard. Instead, hierarchical or bundled approaches should be used, taking into account self-report as well as the many individual and contextual factors that influence pain including clinical history, patient preferences, and response to previous treatments. Alternate models are presented to guide further practice and research.

SummaryBackground Urethrocutaneous fistula is a well-known complication of hypospadias surgery. A recent prospective study by Kundra et al. (Pediatr Anesth 2012) has suggested that caudal anesthesia may increase the risk of fistula formation. We sought to evaluate this possible association and determine if any other novel factors may be associated with fistula formation. Methods Children who underwent primary hypospadias repair between January 1, 1994 and March 31, 2013 at our tertiary care center were included in this study. Reviewed surgical data included repair type, duration of procedure, use of local anesthetic infiltration, and subcutaneous epinephrine. Analgesic factors included use of caudal and/or penile block, opioid usage, postoperative pain scores, and nausea/vomiting. Postoperative surgical complications and estimates of family household median income by zip code were also reviewed. Results Fistula occurrence was not associated with caudal or penile block, severity of postoperative pain, or surgeon experience. A more proximal location of the urethral meatus, longer operating time, and use of subcutaneous epinephrine were significantly more common in patients who developed fistula. As assessed by home address zip code, distance of more than 100 miles and median household income in the bottom 25th percentile of our study population were not associated with fistula, as compared to closer distance or higher income. Conclusion In this series, we found no association between the use of caudal regional anesthesia and fistula formation. Location of the starting urethral meatus, prolonged surgical duration, and subcutaneous epinephrine use were associated with fistula formation. Our findings call into question the routine use of epinephrine in hypospadias repair.

OBJECTIVES Poor parental understanding of prescription opioid risks is associated with potentially dangerous decisions that can contribute to adverse drug events (ADE) in children and adolescents. This study examined whether an interactive Scenario-tailored Opioid Messaging Program (STOMP) would (1) enhance opioid risk perceptions and (2) improve the safety of parents' decision-making. MATERIALS AND METHODS In total, 546 parents were randomized to receive the STOMP versus control information and 516 completed the program. A baseline survey assessed parents' opioid risk knowledge, perceptions, and preferences for pain relief versus risk avoidance (Pain Relief Preference). Parents then made hypothetical decisions to give or withhold a prescribed opioid for high-risk (excessive sedation) and low-risk (no ADE) scenarios. The STOMP provided immediate feedback with specific risk and guidance information; the control condition provided general information. We reassessed knowledge, perceptions, and decision-making up to 3 days thereafter. RESULTS Following the intervention, the STOMP group became more risk avoidant (Pain Relief Preference, mean difference -1.27 [95% confidence interval, -0.8 to -1.75]; P

Patients must receive information in a manner that promotes understanding so they can make informed decisions about anesthesia and other medical interventions. Unfortunately, history is replete with examples of the negative consequences of inadequate disclosure of information and lack of patient understanding. While obtaining consent for anesthesia poses unique challenges, the ability of the anesthesiologist to engage the patient in meaningful discussion is critical as a means to ensure that the patient is truly informed. This narrative review aims to: 1) discuss the process of informed consent as it applies to anesthesia practice; 2) describe the salient issues related to patient capacity, disclosure, understanding, decision-making, and documentation of the informed consent process; and 3) discuss current strategies to improve the presentation and understanding of consent information.Review of the extant literature, including the authors' own research.Despite the ethical imperative of informed consent, many decision-makers have limited understanding of medical information. The reasons for this are multifactorial but often result from incomplete disclosure and presentation of generic information that does not take into account differences in information needs, values, and preferences of individual patients. Several simple strategies are available, however, that can enhance decision-makers' understanding of both written and verbal information.Despite the unique challenges of obtaining consent for anesthesia on the day of surgery, attention to the manner in which information for anesthesia care is provided and adoption of simple strategies to enhance understanding can go a long way to ensure that decision-makers are appropriately informed.

Summary Objectives: Examine factors associated with opioid adverse drug events (ADE) in children. Specific Aims: Examine whether adjuvant nonopioid use is associated with a decreased probability of opioid-ADEs and need for rescue. Background: Opioid-ADEs contribute to serious preventable harm for hospitalized children. Adjuvant nonopioid use may mitigate opioid risk postoperatively, yet few studies support this notion. Method: This nested case–control study included children who required intervention or rescue from opioid-ADEs and procedure-matched controls. Data were recorded from medical records and primary outcomes included serious opioid-ADEs (over-sedation and respiratory depression) and need for rescue (e.g., naloxone, rapid response team). Hierarchical logistic regression (HLR) models examined relationships between factors and opioid-ADEs. Early clinical signs and symptoms of deterioration were examined. Results: Twenty five children with opioid-ADEs and 98 children without events were included. ASA-PS remained an independent risk factor (odds ratio, 2.56 [1.09, 6.03]; P = 0.031), while adjuvant nonopioids a risk reduction factor for opioid-ADEs (OR, 0.16 [0.05, 0.47]; P = 0.001) and need for rescue (0.14 [0.04, 0.47]; P = 0.001). Supplemental oxygen use at PACU discharge was associated with an increased odds of opioid-ADEs (OR, 3.72 [1.35, 10.23]; P = 0.007) and need for rescue (5.5 [1.7, 17.82]; P = 0.002). Conclusions: Findings from this study suggest that strategies such as early use of adjuvant nonopioids may reduce risk of opioid-ADEs postoperatively. Furthermore, children who require supplemental oxygen early postoperatively may be at heightened risk of later events.

Background Aprotinin has been associated with significant morbidity and mortality in adults, leading to its withdrawal from the market and clinical substitution with the lysine analogs, tranexamic acid and e-aminocaproic acid. Neonates undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass are especially at risk for perioperative bleeding, yet little data exist comparing lysine analogs with aprotinin. Methods Neonates undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (January 2006 to December 2009) were included in this single-institution, retrospective cohort study. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were analyzed. The relationship between demographic, surgical risk data, and outcomes were analyzed. Markers of effectiveness included transfusion requirement, duration of operation, duration of ventilation, and intensive care unit length of stay. Markers of safety included reexploration, renal dysfunction, neurologic complications, and death. Results Of 423 included neonates, 271 (64%) received aprotinin and 152 (36%) a lysine analog. Infants who received aprotinin had a higher baseline creatinine and lower weight and gestational age. The aprotinin group experienced shorter time to surgical closure, lower blood product use, and lower rates of reexploration and postoperative renal dysfunction compared with the lysine-analog group. There was no difference in duration of ventilation or intensive care unit stay, neurologic outcomes, or death. Conclusions Neonates who received aprotinin had significantly lower intraoperative transfusion requirements and shorter surgical closure times. The aprotinin group was less likely to require surgical reexploration and had a lower rate of renal injury. These data illustrate the need for further research regarding safety and efficacy of aprotinin in a larger sample of children undergoing cardiac operations.

Five recent cohort studies have shown a frequency of awareness in paediatric anaesthesia of between 0.2% and 1.2%, but they were not individually large enough to identify risk factors. This study pooled raw data from these five studies to identify factors associated with awareness in children. The outcome of awareness was taken as the cases judged to be most likely awareness cases in each study. Logistic regression was used to identify awareness-associated factors. A combined sample of 4486 anaesthetics revealed 33 cases of awareness. Unadjusted analysis demonstrated weak evidence that nitrous oxide used as an anaesthetic maintenance adjunct was associated with awareness (OR 2.04 (95% CI 0.97-4.33), p=0.06), and some evidence that use of a tracheal tube was associated with awareness (OR 2.78 (95% CI 1.11-6.94), p=0.03). Multivariable regression analysis revealed that nitrous oxide maintenance and use of a tracheal tube were independently associated with awareness (nitrous oxide, OR 2.4 (95% CI 1.08-5.32), p=0.03; tracheal tube, OR 3.0 (95% CI 1.20-7.56), p=0.02).

This study evaluated whether an objective tool would provide a more reliable and valid assessment of perioperative risk compared with the ASA-physical status (ASA-PS) in children.A system-based risk assessment tool was developed using these categories: Neurological, Airway, Respiratory, Cardiovascular, and Other (NARCO) with a subcomponent grading surgical severity (SS). Anaesthesiologists reviewed the preoperative assessments and assigned NARCO, SS, and ASA-PS scores independently. Perioperative outcomes were recorded by trained observers. Validity and reliability of the tools were evaluated.NARCO correlated with ASA-PS (ρ=0.664; P0.01) supporting its criterion validity. Inter-rater reliability of the measures was supported (intraclass correlation coefficients 0.71-0.96; κ 0.43-0.87) except for the Airway category. Measures of exact agreement were slightly better for NARCO compared with ASA-PS. NARCO, SS, and ASA-PS scores correlated significantly with perioperative escalation of care, adverse events (AE), hospital length of stay, and admission status. Correlations between NARCO and ASA-PS and outcomes improved when SS was factored into their coding. There were significant, but low, correlations between all measures and mortality. The odds of having escalation of care, AE, and mortality were 5-47 times greater among children with higher risk scores.Findings suggest that all measures of outcome have acceptable to excellent reliability with a slight improvement in agreement for the NARCO compared with the ASA-PS. This study supports the validity of both the NARCO and the ASA-PS in predicting perioperative risk in children with a slight improvement in correlations when combined with the SS score.

Summary Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a serious complication that occurs commonly following cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in infants and children. Underlying risk factors for AKI remain unclear, given changes in CPB practices during recent years. This retrospective, case–control study examined the relationships between patient, perioperative factors, AKI, and kidney failure in children who underwent CPB. Methods: Cohorts of children with and without AKI were identified from the cardiac perfusion and nephrology consult databases. Demographic, perioperative, and postoperative outcome data were extracted from the databases and from medical records. Children were stratified into groups based on the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative’s RIFLE definitions for acute kidney risk or injury (AKI-RI) and kidney failure. Results: The study groups included 308 controls (no AKI-RI or failure), 161 with AKI-RI, and 89 with failure. Young age, preoperative need for mechanical ventilation, milrinone, or gentamicin; intraoperative use of milrinone and furosemide; durations of CPB and anesthesia; multiple cross-clamp and transfusion of blood products were significantly associated with AKI or failure. Young age, perioperative use of milrinone, multiple cross-clamps, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, cardiac failure, neurological complications, sepsis, and failure significantly increased the odds of mortality. Conclusion: This study identified multiple perioperative risk factors for AKI-RI, failure, and mortality in children undergoing CPB. In addition to commonly known risk factors, perioperative use of milrinone, particularly in young infants, and furosemide were independently predictive of poor renal outcomes in this sample. Findings suggest a need for the development of protocols aimed at renal protection in specific at risk patients.

OBJECTIVES: Overweight in children is most commonly described by using BMI. Because BMI does not adequately describe regional (central) adiposity, other indices of body fatness are being explored. Neck circumference (NC) is positively associated with obstructive sleep apnea, diabetes, and hypertension in adults. NC also has positive correlation with BMI in adults. The possible role of NC in screening for high BMI in children is not well characterized. The aims of this investigation were to examine the correlation between BMI and NC in children and to determine the best NC cutoff that identifies children with high BMI. METHODS: Children who were aged 6 to 18 years and undergoing elective noncardiac surgeries were the subjects of this study. Trained research assistants collected clinical and anthropometric data from all patients. We calculated Pearson correlation coefficients between NC and other indices of obesity. We then determined by receiver operating characteristic analyses the optimal NC cutoff for identifying children with high BMI. RESULTS: Among 1102 children, 52% were male. NC was significantly correlated with age, BMI, and waist circumference in both boys and girls, although the correlation was stronger in older children. Optimal NC cutoff indicative of high BMI in boys ranged from 28.5 to 39.0 cm. Corresponding values in girls ranged from 27.0 to 34.6 cm. CONCLUSIONS: NC is significantly correlated with indices of adiposity and can reliably identify children with high BMI. NC is a simple technique that has good interrater reliability and could be used to screen for overweight and obesity in children.

Background: Pediatric admissions for pain have been increasing, and pediatric consultation-liaison (CL) psychologists are frequently consulted to address pain coping for hospitalized youth. Many apps have been developed to target pain coping strategies, but no specific intervention has been developed to target pain coping using mobile health (mHealth) at the bedside. We describe an innovative, pilot, proof of concept mHealth intervention program using clinical apps to target pain coping strategies in youth referred for a pediatric psychology consult during their hospitalization. Methods: Parent-child dyads (n=18, youth ages 7–19) completed measures assessing the child’s pain history, pain catastrophizing, and pain interference during their child’s inpatient admission. Participants were loaned a tablet and prescribed specific clinical apps as part of their psychology consult to target pain coping. Youth tracked the frequency and duration of clinical app use. At about 2 weeks post-discharge families (n=10) completed a satisfaction survey about their experience with the intervention and again completed the pain outcome measures administered at baseline. Results: The clinical apps were used frequently during the hospitalization, primarily for relaxation. Youth who tracked their app use in the hospital were more likely to participate at Time 2. There was significant attrition from enrollment to Time 2. There were no changes in pain level from Time 1 to Time 2. Pain catastrophizing scores for youth decreased significantly at the follow-up interval. Most participants felt that the clinical apps helped with inpatient pain management and 70% continued to use the clinical apps after discharge. Parents universally would recommend the mHealth intervention to other families. Conclusions: The feasibility of this proof of concept intervention is mixed. The intervention was acceptable to our CL team, we had no implementation issues, and there were high levels of acceptability and accessibility for patients. However, attrition from across time points presents a challenge to interpretation of results and highlights the difficulty in implementing such an intervention with a high acuity population. Further research is needed to better describe the impact of clinical apps use on post-discharge outcomes, but this mHealth pilot showed promise as an adjunct to standard inpatient CL interventions for pediatric pain.

Background Few investigators have evaluated pain assessment tools in the critical care setting.Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Behavioral Scale in assessing pain in critically ill adults and children unable to self-report pain.Methods Three nurses simultaneously, but independently, observed and scored pain behaviors twice in 29 critically ill adults and 8 children: before administration of an analgesic or during a painful procedure, and 15 to 30 minutes after the administration or procedure. Two nurses used the FLACC scale, the third used either the Checklist of Nonverbal Pain Indicators (for adults) or the COMFORT scale (for children).Results For 73 observations, FLACC scores correlated highly with the other 2 scores (ρ = 0.963 and 0.849, respectively), supporting criterion validity. Significant decreases in FLACC scores after analgesia (or at rest) supported construct validity of the tool (mean, 5.27; SD, 2.3 vs mean, 0.52; SD, 1.1; P < .001). Exact agreement and κ statistics, as well as intraclass correlation coefficients (0.67–0.95), support excellent interrater reliability of the tool. Internal consistency was excellent; the Cronbach α was 0.882 when all items were included.Conclusions Although similar in content to other behavioral pain scales, the FLACC can be used across populations of patients and settings, and the scores are comparable to those of the commonly used 0-to-10 number rating scale.

Summary Background Studies have found a 30–50% increase in postoperative opioid demand following intraoperative use of remifentanil infusion, suggesting development of acute opioid tolerance. This study was undertaken to compare postoperative opioid requirements in children who received remifentanil versus sufentanil infusions during spine fusion. Methods A secondary review of data from children 8–18 years of age, who had undergone spine fusion was conducted. Patients who had received remifentanil infusions were matched by age, procedure, and duration of anaesthesia to those who received sufentanil infusions. Data included patient demographics, total intraoperative and postoperative opioids, and self-reported pain scores. Postoperative pain was managed with morphine patient controlled analgesia, and acetaminophen and diazepam as needed. Results Forty-four children (13.5 ± 3 years) were included. Demographic and procedural data were similar between groups. There were no differences between remifentanil or sufentanil groups in high pain scores (5.3 ± 2.4 vs. 5.7 ± 2.6, respectively) or cumulative morphine requirements (1.02 ± 0.32 mg/kg vs. 1.07 ± 0.48 mg/kg) during the first 24 h after surgery. Conclusion This study found no difference in opioid consumption between children who received remifentanil versus sufentanil infusions. Findings suggest that these short-acting potent opioids similarly affect morphine requirements following spine fusion.

Summary Introduction: Although blood pressure (BP) monitoring is a recommended standard of care by the ASA, and pediatric anesthesiologists routinely monitor the BP of their patients and when appropriate treat deviations from ‘normal’, there is no robust definition of hypotension in any of the pediatric anesthesia texts or journals. Consequently, what constitutes hypotension in pediatric anesthesia is currently unknown. We designed a questionnaire-based survey of pediatric anesthesiologists to determine the BP ranges and thresholds used to define intraoperative hypotension (IOH). Methods: Members of the Society of Pediatric Anesthesia (SPA) and the Association of Paediatric Anaesthetists (APA) of Great Britain and Ireland were contacted through e-mail to participate in this survey. We asked a few demographic questions and five questions about specific definitions of hypotension for different age groups of patients undergoing inguinal herniorraphy, a common pediatric surgical procedure. Results: The overall response rate was 56% (483/860), of which 76% were SPA members. Majority of the respondents (72%) work in academic institutions, while 8.9% work in institutions with fewer than 1000 annual pediatric surgical caseload. About 76% of respondents indicated that a 20–30% reduction in baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) indicates significant hypotension in children under anesthesia. Most responders (86.7%) indicated that they use mean arterial pressure or SBP (72%) to define IOH. The mean SBP values for hypotension quoted by SPA members was about 5–7% lower across all pediatric age groups compared to values quoted by APA members (P = 0.001 for all age groups). Conclusions: There is great variability in the BP parameters used and the threshold used for defining and treating IOH among pediatric anesthesiologists. The majority of respondents considered a 20–30% reduction from baseline in SBP as indicative of significant hypotension. Lack of a consensus definition for a common clinical condition like IOH could have implications for patient care as well as future clinical research.

Objectives: Unlike information provided for research, information disclosed to patients for treatment or procedures is largely unregulated and, as such, there is likely a considerable variability in the type and amount of disclosure. This study was designed to examine the nature of information provided to parents regarding options for postoperative pain control and their understanding thereof. Methods: One hundred eighty-seven parents of children scheduled to undergo a surgical procedure requiring inpatient postoperative pain control completed questionnaires that elicited information regarding their perceptions and understanding of, and satisfaction with, information regarding postoperative pain management. Results: Results showed that there was considerable variability in the content and amount of information provided to parents based on the method of postoperative pain control provided. Parents whose child received patient-controlled analgesia were given significantly (P< 0.025) more information on the risks and benefits compared with those receiving nurse controlled or intravenous-prn analgesia. Approximately one third of parents had no understanding of the risks associated with postoperative pain management. Parents who received pain information preoperatively and who were given information regarding the risks and benefits had improved understanding compared with parents who received no or minimal information (P

BACKGROUND: Difficulty assessing pain has been cited as one of the primary reasons for infrequent and inadequate assessment and analgesia for children with cognitive impairment (CI). Several behavioral observational pain tools have been shown to have good psychometric properties for pain assessment in this population; however, routine clinical use may depend largely on their pragmatic qualities. We designed this study to evaluate pragmatic attributes or clinical utility properties of three recently developed pain assessment tools for children with CI. METHODS: A sample of clinicians from three medical centers were asked to review 15 videotaped observations of children with CI, recorded during their first three postoperative days during participation in a previous study. Participants scored pain using the revised-Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (r-FLACC) tool (individualized for the child during the previous study) for five observations, the noncommunicative Non-Communicating Children’s Pain Checklist-Postoperative Version (NCCPC-PV) for five, and the Nursing Assessment of Pain Intensity (NAPI) for five observations. After their review of all segments, participants completed the Clinical Utility Attributes Questionnaire (CUAQ) ranking three attributes of clinical utility; complexity, compatibility, and relative advantage. RESULTS: Five physicians and 15 nurses comprised the sample. There was excellent agreement between the coded pain scores (i.e., mild, moderate, severe pain) assigned using all tools and r-FLACC scores assigned by original observers (88%–98% exact agreement; 0.71–0.96). The internal consistency or reliability of the CUAQ was supported by high values for each of the subscales ( 0.84–0.93). Subscale and total CUAQ scores were higher for the r-FLACC and NAPI compared with the NCCPC-PV. The r-FLACC had similar scores for complexity, but slightly higher scores for compatibility, relative advantage, and total utility compared with the NAPI. CONCLUSIONS: We found that clinicians rated the complexity, compatibility, relative advantage, and overall clinical utility higher for the r-FLACC and NAPI compared with the NCCPC-PV, suggesting that these tools may be more readily adopted into clinical practice. (Anesth Analg 2008;106:72‐8)

Summary Background: Few articles have addressed the issue of the child who refuses anesthesia or sedation for surgery. A survey of members of the Society for Pediatric Anesthesia in the USA was conducted regarding their experience with pediatric refusal and assent for surgery. Methods: Structured response and open-end questions were used in a confidential postal survey to assess the following: details of cancellations, the use of, and attitudes to, physical restraint at induction, premedication, the management of a hypothetical case of child refusal and individual techniques used for uncooperative children. Results: Surveys were received from 453/852 anesthesiologists for a 57% response rate. Nine percent and 45% of respondents had cancelled one or more cases for child refusal in the past year and during their entire career respectively. Forty-four percent of respondents used restraint in the majority of children 11 years. Respondents were more uncomfortable with restraint in older children and less likely to proceed with induction. Twelve years was the median age when respondents would respect the child’s refusal to proceed. Conclusions: Cancellation of planned surgery because of child refusal is not uncommon. It is important to recognize the potentially uncooperative child, particularly older children with developmental delay or a lack of understanding. Discussion with child and parents, selective use of premedication and different induction agents, distraction, play techniques, gentle restraint and the option of cancellation and review should all be considered.

Summary Background Children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) may experience pain differently compared to other children, yet the evidence is equivocal regarding whether pain is heightened or dampened. This prospective observational study, therefore, was designed to compare the postoperative pain experiences in children with and without ADHD. Methods Children aged 7–17 years with a diagnosis of ADHD (n = 119) who were scheduled for a surgical procedure requiring postoperative pain management and a matched cohort of children without ADHD were recruited (n = 122). Postoperative pain scores and analgesic use were recorded for 1 week, as was parents’ estimate of their child's return to normal activity. Results There were no differences in highest pain scores between children with ADHD (3.3 ± 2.5, 0–10 numerical rating scale) and those without (2.8 ± 1.9). Postoperative opioid use was also similar on day 1 following surgery (0.12 ± 0.3 mg·kg−1 vs 0.08 mg·kg−1 ± 0.1 morphine equivalents, respectively). Children with ADHD, however, had a significantly longer return to normal activity (4.9 ± 3.8 vs 3.8 ± 3.0 days; P

Summary While most anesthesiologists and other physician- or nurse-scientists are familiar with traditional descriptive, observational, and interventional study design, survey research has typically remained the preserve of the social scientists. To that end, this article provides a basic overview of the elements of good survey design and offers some rules of thumb to help guide investigators through the survey process.

Summary Background: Emergence agitation (EA) is a common postoperative problem in young children who have received sevoflurane and isoflurane for general anesthesia. This randomized, double-blinded study evaluated the efficacy of intraoperative clonidine in reducing EA, and describes its recovery profile. Methods: With Institutional Review Board approval and informed consent, children undergoing brief, minimally painful procedures were studied. All children received preemptive analgesia with acetaminophen and ketorolac, sevoflurane for induction, and isoflurane for maintenance of anesthesia. Children received either 2 lgAEkg )1 clonidine or placebo intravenously (i.v.) following induction of anesthesia. Children were observed postoperatively for behavior and side effects, and their parents were telephoned the next day to determine postdischarge recovery characteristics. Results: One hundred and twenty children were included in this study: 59 of whom received clonidine, and 61 placebo; 41% of those in the placebo group exhibited moderate–severe EA compared with only 22% of those in the clonidine group (P < 0.03). Compared with those who received placebo, children who received clonidine awakened more slowly (22 min vs 14 min), had a longer postanesthesia care unit stay (57 min vs 46 min), and experienced sleepiness more frequently after discharge (75% vs 39%; all comparisons significant at P < 0.03). There were no adverse cardiorespiratory events in either group. Conclusions: Findings demonstrate that i.v. clonidine administered after induction of anesthesia significantly reduces the incidence of EA in young children, but is associated with sleepiness postoperatively.

Summary Background: Difficulty with pain assessment in individuals whocannot self-report their pain poses a significant barrier to effective painmanagement. However, available assessment tools lack consistentreliability as pain measures in children with cognitive impairment(CI). This study evaluated the validity and reliability of the revisedand individualized Face Legs Activity Cry and Consolability (FLACC)behavioral pain assessment tool in children with CI.Methods: Children with CI scheduled for elective surgery werestudied. The FLACC was revised to include specific descriptors andparent-identified, unique behaviors for individual children. Thechild’s ability to self-report pain was evaluated. Postoperatively, twonurses scored pain using the revised FLACC scale before and afteranalgesic administration, and, children self-reported a pain score, ifable. Observations were videotaped and later viewed by experiencednurses blinded to analgesic administration.Results: Eighty observations were recorded in 52 children aged4–19 years. Twenty-one parents added individualized pain behaviorsto the revised FLACC. Interrater reliability was supported by excellentintraclass correlation coefficients (ICC, ranging from 0.76 to 0.90) andadequate j statistics (0.44–0.57). Criterion validity was supported bythe correlations between FLACC, parent, and child scores (q ¼ 0.65–0.87; P < 0.001). Construct validity was demonstrated by the decreasein FLACC scores following analgesic administration (6.1 ± 2.6 vs1.9 ± 2.7; P < 0.001).Conclusions: Findings support the reliability and validity of theFLACC as a measure of pain in children with CI.Keywords: pain assessment; developmentally delayed children; facelegs activity cry and consolability pain tool

Background Despite parents' stated desire to treat pain in their children, recent studies have critiqued their underuse of prescribed analgesics to treat pain in their children after painful procedures. Parents' analgesic preferences, including their perceived importance of providing pain relief or avoiding adverse drug effects may have important implications for their analgesic decisions, yet no studies have evaluated the influence of preferences on decisions to withhold prescribed opioids for children. Objectives We prospectively explored how parents' preferences influenced decisions to withhold prescribed opioids when faced with hypothetical dilemmas and after hospital discharge. Design Prospective Observational Study Design: Phase 1 included hypothetical analgesic decisions and Phase 2, real analgesic decisions after hospital discharge. Setting Large tertiary care pediatric hospital in the Midwest of the United States. Participants Five-hundred seven parents whose children underwent a painful surgical procedure requiring an opioid prescription were included. Methods At baseline, parents completed surveys assessing their pain relief preference (i.e., their rated importance of pain relief relative to adverse drug event avoidance), preferred treatment thresholds (i.e., pain level at which they would give an opioid), adverse drug event understanding, and hypothetical trade-off decisions (i.e., scenarios presenting variable pain and adverse drug event symptoms in a child). After discharge, parents recorded all analgesics they gave their child as well as pain scores at the time of administration. Results Higher preference to provide pain relief (over avoid analgesic risk) lessened the likelihood that parents would withhold the prescribed opioid when adverse drug event symptoms were present together with high pain scores in the hypothetical scenarios. Additionally, higher preferred treatment thresholds increased the likelihood of parents withholding opioids during their hypothetical decision-making as well as at home. The strong influence of these preferences weakened the effect of opioid ADE understanding on decisions to withhold opioids when ADEs (i.e., nausea/vomiting or oversedation) were present together with high pain. Conclusions Findings from this study suggest that preferences strongly influence and may interfere with parents' effective and safe analgesic decision-making when conflicting symptoms (i.e., high pain and an ADE) are present. To improve effective analgesic use, there is a need to shape parents' preferences and improve their understanding of safe actions that will treat pain when ADE symptoms are present.

Parent-assigned pain scores have been used as proxy measures of pain for children, such as those with cognitive impairment (CI), who cannot self-report. However, the accuracy of parent-assigned pain ratings for children with CI has not been studied. This study evaluated the construct and criterion validity of parental pain scores of children with CI. Fifty-two children aged 4 to 19 years with CI and their parents/guardians were included in this observational study. Children were observed and assessed for pain by parents using the Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) observational tool and the 0 to 10 Numbers Scale, and simultaneously by nurses using the FLACC. Children who were cognitively able scored pain using simplified scales. Parent scores decreased after analgesic administration (6.4 +/- 2.5 vs. 3.1 +/- 2.3; p = .004), supporting their construct validity. Parents' FLACC and Numbers ratings correlated well with nurse ratings (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.78 [confidence interval = 0.63-0.87] and intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.73 [confidence interval = 0.59-0.83], respectively). The parents' coded Numbers ratings correlated moderately with their child's ratings (rho = 0.57; p = .05) and agreed in 20% to 100% of cases (kappa = 0.388). There was better overall agreement between parents' FLACC scores and child ratings (33%-67% agreement; kappa = 0.43). The parent underestimated the child's pain with FLACC ratings in only one case (8%), but overestimated pain in three cases (25%). This study suggests that parents of children with CI provide reasonable estimates of their child's pain, particularly when using a structured pain tool. Parents may, however, tend to overestimate their child's pain during the early postoperative period.

Summary Identification of barriers that inhibit effective pain treatment in children with cognitive impairment (CI) may facilitate targeted interventions to ensure that they receive optimal care. This study was undertaken to identify factors that impede effective treatment of pain in children with CI. Clinicians who provided direct care to children were surveyed regarding perceptions of pain management issues. 215 nurses and physicians completed and returned surveys. Difficulties with pain assessment, the lack of valid pain assessment tools, and poor documentation were ranked by the majority of clinicians as factors that impeded their ability to effectively manage pain in this population. Additionally, 88% believed that inadequate education impedes effective pain management in this population, and 88% would attend continuing education courses on pain in children. These data suggest that development of valid and clinically useful pain assessment tools, and focused continuing education may provide the best interventions toward the improvement of pain management in this and similar vulnerable populations.

Objective. The ability to assess accurately the risks and benefits of a study are important to ensure that the subject can make an informed decision regarding his or her own or his or her surrogate’s participation. This study was designed to examine factors that influence parents’ assessments of the risks and benefits of anesthesia and surgery research involving their children. Methods. The study population consisted of parents of 505 children who had been approached to participate in 1 of several ongoing clinical studies. Regardless of their decision to allow or decline their child’s participation in a study, parents completed a questionnaire that elicited information regarding their perceptions of the risks and benefits of the study and factors that had influenced their decision. Results. Factors that influenced positive risk/benefit assessments by the parents included use of a placebo, the designated risk category of the study, the clarity of information given, the parents’ perceptions of the amount of time provided to make a decision, and the amount of privacy afforded them in making a decision. Furthermore, positive risk/benefit assessments were associated with low decisional uncertainty and greater trust in the medical system. Conclusions. Identification of factors that influence parents’ perceptions of the risks and benefits of a research study is important as a means to optimize the manner in which consent information is disclosed and to ensure that parents and subjects can assess accurately the relative importance of the risks and benefits.