Search

Castleman disease (CD) includes a group of rare and heterogeneous disorders with characteristic lymph node histopathological abnormalities. CD can occur in a single lymph node station, which is referred to as unicentric CD (UCD). CD can also involve multicentric lymphadenopathy and inflammatory symptoms (multicentric CD [MCD]). MCD includes human herpesvirus-8 (HHV-8)–associated MCD, POEMS-associated MCD, and HHV-8−/idiopathic MCD (iMCD). The first-ever diagnostic and treatment guidelines were recently developed for iMCD by an international expert consortium convened by the Castleman Disease Collaborative Network (CDCN). The focus of this report is to establish similar guidelines for the management of UCD. To this purpose, an international working group of 42 experts from 10 countries was convened to establish consensus recommendations based on review of treatment in published cases of UCD, the CDCN ACCELERATE registry, and expert opinion. Complete surgical resection is often curative and is therefore the preferred first-line therapy, if possible. The management of unresectable UCD is more challenging. Existing evidence supports that asymptomatic unresectable UCD may be observed. The anti–interleukin-6 monoclonal antibody siltuximab should be considered for unresectable UCD patients with an inflammatory syndrome. Unresectable UCD that is symptomatic as a result of compression of vital neighboring structures may be rendered amenable to resection by medical therapy (eg, rituximab, steroids), radiotherapy, or embolization. Further research is needed in UCD patients with persisting constitutional symptoms despite complete excision and normal laboratory markers. We hope that these guidelines will improve outcomes in UCD and help treating physicians decide the best therapeutic approach for their patients.

Background: Patients with multiple myeloma, an incurable haematological cancer, often receive palliative care only late in their trajectory. Criteria for early referral are lacking. Aim: To identify which patients might benefit from early integration, by identifying trajectories of health-related quality of life and the determinants for declining or poor Health related quality of life . Design: Prospective, longitudinal cohort study. Participants: Multiple myeloma patients at all stages (newly diagnosed, first-line or second-line treatment, early or later treatment-free interval, refractory disease) from in- and outpatient units at 14 hospitals in England were recruited. In addition to clinical information and standardised Health related quality of life and psychological aspects, the Myeloma Patient Outcome Scale (MyPOS) measured palliative care concerns. Results: A total of 238 patients were recruited, on average 3.5 years ( SD: 3.4) post-diagnosis. Latent mixture growth models identified four Health related quality of life trajectories. Classes 3 and 4 represent trajectories of stable poor Health related quality of life or declining Health related quality of life over an 8-month period. The strongest predictors of poor outcome at the end of follow-up were general symptom level (odds ratio (OR): 1.3, 95% CI: 1.0–1.6, p = 0.028), presence of clinically relevant anxiety (OR: 1.2, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.0–1.4, p = 0.019), and presence of pain (OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.0–1.1, p = 0.018), all being more predictive than demographic or clinical characteristics. Conclusion: General symptom level, pain and presence of anxiety predict declining Health related quality of life in multiple myeloma. Identification of patients with palliative care needs should focus on assessing patient-reported symptoms and psychosocial well-being for identifying those at risk of deterioration.

Background Renal impairment is a life threatening complication of myeloma with up to 20-25% of patients presenting with renal dysfunction. Around 28% of newly diagnosed myeloma patients with renal failure do not survive beyond 100 days compared with 10% overall. In addition to poor survival, there are no quality of life (QoL) data from published renal failure myeloma studies to guide management. OPTIMAL trial utilizes the EuroQoL (EQ-5D-3L) heath questionnaire, a validated instrument for health outcomes, to measure QoL in these patients. It is a 3 level, 5 dimensional questionnaire, assessing mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression with either no problems, some problems or extreme problems. Participants also rate their current health on a visual analogue scale (VAS) of 0-100. We hypothesize that reported QoL in typical myeloma trials are better than the QoL for patients with renal impairment such as those recruited into the OPTIMAL trial. Methods OPTIMAL is a randomised, multi-centre phase II trial of newly diagnosed myeloma patients with renal impairment (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02424851). Participants were randomised to receive four 12 week cycles of Bortezomib, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone (BBD) or Thalidomide, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone (BTD); all participants received bendamustine and dexamethasone in 3 week cycles. Participants not considered suitable for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) could be given a further 2 cycles of treatment in their respective arms. Patient reported outcomes were measured using the validated EQ-5D-3L. Participants were asked to complete a questionnaire at baseline and on day 1 of each treatment cycle and at 1 month and 12 month follow up visits. Differences in changes of EQ-5D-3L and the VAS scores between baseline and 1 month follow up were assessed by 2 sample t-tests. To compare the EQ-5D-3L data from the OPTIMAL trial to others, a literature search was conducted to see if any data were available that provided further insight into the QoL in patient's diagnosed with myeloma and renal failure. PUBMED and MEDLINE were explored and authors emailed if EQ-5D-3L data was not identified. Results OPTIMAL recruited 31 patients between March 2015 and March 2019 from 7 centres within the UK. Of these, 17 patients completed EQ-5D-3L at baseline and at 1 month follow up; 8 on BBD and 9 on BTD. Sixty five per cent of patients were ≤70 years old, 76% male, 35% were CKD stage 4 and 65% were CKD stage 5, 59% had planned ASCT, 88% had ECOG performance status 0 or 1, 35% were on dialysis and 94% were ISS stage III. At baseline a mean of 35.2% of patients reported some or extreme problems across the 5 QoL domains compared with 36.6% at 1 month follow up (Table 1). No significant changes were detected in mean EQ-5D-3L (p=0.33) or VAS scores (p=0.72) between baseline and 1 month follow up by treatment arm (Table 2). Additionally, no differences in EQ-5D-3L scores were found between age group or dialysis status (p>0.1; Table 3). However, some improvement in anxiety and depression levels were observed overall with 59% of patients reporting none at baseline increasing to 76% at follow up. No changes were reported in self-care or the ability to perform usual activities. Mobility decreased from 71% experiencing no problems to 59%. In order to compare QoL reported by OPTIMAL with QoL reported in published myeloma trials, a literature search was undertaken and identified 48 articles of which only 11 studies reported QoL and only 4 of these reported the EQ-5D-5L. No studies assessed QoL in patients similar to the OPTIMAL trial patient population with renal impairment. However a couple of studies demonstrated improved QoL at 3 months compared to baseline across treatment arms. Conclusion It is well known that treatments used within clinical trials can significantly improve the outcomes for patients but it is important to also measure the impact on patient's QoL. The OPTIMAL trial demonstrated that this poor prognostic set of patients with renal impairment had significant reduction in anxiety and depression at 1 month follow up. It was disappointing that a literature search demonstrated a paucity of QoL data routinely collected and reported within clinical trials. Patients need to know the impact of treatments on outcomes such as survival but also need to know the impact on their QoL. Funding: NAPP Pharmaceuticals, JANSSEN-Cilag Ltd and Blood Cancers UK. Disclosures Ramasamy: Takeda: Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Lindsay:Amgen: Other: Travel Expenses; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Expenses; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses.

Castleman disease (CD) describes a group of heterogeneous hematologic disorders with characteristic histopathological features. CD can present with unicentric or multicentric (MCD) regions of lymph node enlargement. Some cases of MCD are caused by human herpesvirus-8 (HHV-8), whereas others are HHV-8–negative/idiopathic (iMCD). Treatment of iMCD is challenging, and outcomes can be poor because no uniform treatment guidelines exist, few systematic studies have been conducted, and no agreed upon response criteria have been described. The purpose of this paper is to establish consensus, evidence-based treatment guidelines based on the severity of iMCD to improve outcomes. An international Working Group of 42 experts from 10 countries was convened by the Castleman Disease Collaborative Network to establish consensus guidelines for the management of iMCD based on published literature, review of treatment effectiveness for 344 cases, and expert opinion. The anti–interleukin-6 monoclonal antibody siltuximab (or tocilizumab, if siltuximab is not available) with or without corticosteroids is the preferred first-line therapy for iMCD. In the most severe cases, adjuvant combination chemotherapy is recommended. Additional agents are recommended, tailored by disease severity, as second- and third-line therapies for treatment failures. Response criteria were formulated to facilitate the evaluation of treatment failure or success. These guidelines should help treating physicians to stratify patients based on disease severity in order to select the best available therapeutic option. An international registry for patients with CD (ACCELERATE, #NCT02817997) was established in October 2016 to collect patient outcomes to increase the evidence base for selection of therapies in the future.

Improving outcomes in multiple myeloma will involve not only development of new therapies but also better use of existing treatments. We performed RNA sequencing on samples from newly diagnosed patients enrolled in the phase 2 PADIMAC (Bortezomib, Adriamycin, and Dexamethasone Therapy for Previously Untreated Patients with Multiple Myeloma: Impact of Minimal Residual Disease in Patients with Deferred ASCT) study. Using synthetic annealing and the large margin nearest neighbor algorithm, we developed and trained a 7-gene signature to predict treatment outcome. We tested the signature in independent cohorts treated with bortezomib- and lenalidomide-based therapies. The signature was capable of distinguishing which patients would respond better to which regimen. In the CoMMpass data set, patients who were treated correctly according to the signature had a better progression-free survival (median, 20.1 months vs not reached; hazard ratio [HR], 0.40; confidence interval [CI], 0.23-0.72; P = .0012) and overall survival (median, 30.7 months vs not reached; HR, 0.41; CI, 0.21-0.80; P = .0049) than those who were not. Indeed, the outcome for these correctly treated patients was noninferior to that for those treated with combined bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone, arguably the standard of care in the United States but not widely available elsewhere. The small size of the signature will facilitate clinical translation, thus enabling more targeted drug regimens to be delivered in myeloma.

Background Renal impairment is a life threatening complication of myeloma with up to 20-25% of patients presenting with renal dysfunction. Outcome is poor as a result of a high early mortality. Around 28% of newly diagnosed myeloma patients with renal failure do not survive beyond 100 days compared with 10% overall. Studies have shown that within weeks of diagnosing myeloma with renal failure, treatment with dexamethasone alone or combined with bortezomib lowers serum free light chain (sFLC) levels by more than 50% in half of patients; achieving lower sFLC levels in this early period is associated with a greater chance of being alive and dialysis free at 100 days. Methods OPTIMAL is a randomised, multi-centre phase II trial of newly diagnosed myeloma patients with renal impairment. Renal impairment defined as 18 years old, chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 4 or 5, not pregnant or risk of pregnancy for child bearing women, or partner of male participants, free of malignancies for >2 years, able to comply with all trial requirements and give fully informed consent. Patients were randomised to receive 4 cycles of either Bortezomib, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone (BBD) or Thalidomide, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone (BTD); all participants received bendamustine and dexamethasone in three week cycles. Treatment period for participants receiving 4 cycles of therapy was 12 weeks. Participants not considered suitable for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) could be given a further two cycles of treatment (up to 6 cycles in total) in their respective arms. The trial was powered to detect 23% differences in the percentage of patients achieving >50% reduction in sFLC between treatment arms, e.g. from 60% to 83%, with 80% power and a 5% 2-sided significance level, recruiting 60 patients in each arm. At the pre-planned interim analysis, the data and safety monitoring committee endorsed the closure of the trial as a 60% difference in sFLC was detected and there was no obvious benefit for the BTD arm. This was also endorsed by the trial steering committee and trial management group. Co-primary endpoints were sFLC response from baseline to week 6 (after receiving two cycles of trial treatment) and renal response according to the modified International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria after receiving four cycles of trial treatment. Secondary endpoints included haematological responses, toxicity and overall survival. Results OPTIMAL recruited 31 patients between March 2015 and March 2019 from seven centres within the UK; 16 on BBD and 15 on BTD. Fifty two per cent of patients were ≤70 years old, 55% male, 35% were CKD stage 4 and 65% were CKD stage 5, 48% had planned autologous-stem cell transplantation, 75% had ECOG performance status 0 or 1, 29% were on dialysis and 90% were ISS stage III. Serum free light chain response was assessed in 29 patients where samples were available at screening and at the end of two cycles of treatment. 81% of patients on BBD achieved vGPR compared to 23% on BTD, Fisher's p=0.006, table 1. Nine patients were on dialysis at the time of screening (6 on BBD and 3 on BTD). Complete or partial renal response was achieved by 2 (50%) of patients on BBD compared to 1 (11%) on BTD, Fisher's p=0.05, table 2. Two patients on BBD arm reported reversibility of dialysis dependency after four cycles of treatment. Two patients not previously on dialysis required dialysis after 4 cycles of BTD. Seven deaths were reported from the total 31 patients (5 (31%) on BBD arm and 2 (13%) on BTD arm). There were 33 reported serious adverse events (SAEs) 14 on BBD and 19 on BTD. Conclusion OPTIMAL demonstrated a significant increase in the number of sFLC responders after the first 2 cycles for those patients allocated BBD compared to BTD; this trend continued when assessing renal response after 4 cycles with more patients being dialysis independent after receiving BBD. Funding: Project funded by NAPP Pharmaceuticals, JANSSEN-Cilag Ltd and Bloodwise (formerly named Leukaemia and Lymphoma Research). Disclosures Ramasamy: Oncopeptides and Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; NAPP Pharmaceuticals Ltd.: Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag Ltd.: Research Funding. Drayson:Abingdon Health: Consultancy, Equity Ownership.

Objectives Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable haematological disease. Due to novel agents, overall survival has improved in this group, yet there are no systematic reviews to understand the symptom profiles resulting from disease and treatment-related toxicities. We aimed to synthesise data on prevalence of symptoms in patients with MM. Methods A systematic database and grey literature search was conducted in 6 databases. Random effects meta-analysis with inverse variance weighting to pool prevalence data was performed. Results 36 studies were included of which 34 studies (N = 3,023) provided data for meta-analysis. 27 distinct symptoms were reported, with the majority of studies focusing on pain (n=27), fatigue (n=19) and problems with functioning (n=15). The most prevalent symptoms were fatigue (98.8%, 95% CI 98.1 – 99.2%), pain (73%, 39.9 – 91.7), constipation (65.2%, 22.9-92.2) and tingling in the hands/feet with 53.4% (0.4-99.7). The most common problems were decreased physical functioning (98.9%, 98.2 – 99.3), decreased cognitive functioning (80.2%, 40 – 96.1) and financial difficulties (78.4%, 39.1 – 95.4). These problems were present in newly diagnosed to advanced disease stage. Conclusions Optimal quality of life and good symptom management in this incurable disease can only be achieved by routinely assessing symptoms throughout the disease trajectory. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

The NF-κB transcription factor pathway is aberrantly activated in multiple myeloma (MM) and many other cancers, where it promotes malignancy by upregulating survival genes, thus providing a compelling rationale for therapeutically targeting this pathway in MM. However, despite aggressive efforts to develop a specific NF-κB or IκB kinase (IKK)β inhibitor, no such inhibitor has been approved, due to the preclusive toxicities associated with the general suppression of NF-κB. As a key pathogenetic activity of NF-κB in MM is to block apoptosis through the induction of target genes, an attractive alternative to globally inhibiting NF-κB would be to therapeutically target the non-redundant, cancer-specific downstream effectors of the NF-κB survival pathway. Recently, we identified the interaction between the NF-κB-regulated antiapoptotic factor, GADD45β, and the JNK kinase, MKK7, as a pathogenically critical and cancer cell-restricted survival module downstream of NF-κB and novel therapeutic target in MM. Further, we developed a D-tripeptide inhibitor of the GADD45β/MKK7 complex, DTP3, which effectively kills MM cells by inducing MKK7/JNK-dependent apoptosis and, importantly, is not toxic to normal tissues. Due to this cancer-cell specificity, DTP3 has similar anti-cancer efficacy to bortezomib, but more than 100-fold higher cancer-cell specificity in patient MM cells, ex vivo. DTP3 also displays potent and cancer-selective activity against MM in preclinical animal models, with no apparent side-effects, and far greater therapeutic index than existing treatments. DTP3 further displays synergistic activity with conventional MM therapies, such as bortezomib, suggesting a clinical utility as frontline combination therapy. Additionally, it retains therapeutic efficacy in MM cells that are resistant to most common MM treatments, suggesting further clinical utility. We currently aim to conduct a phase I/IIa clinical trial of DTP3 in MM to deliver clinical Proof of Concept for a cancer-selective NF-κB-targeting strategy as a highly effective novel therapy. This first-in-man study will commence in late 2015. We report here the results from the regulatory pharmacodynamics (PD), safety pharmacology, pharmacokinetic (PK), and toxicology studies. 28-day intravenous (i.v.) repeat dose toxicology studies in rat and dog demonstrate that DTP3 is well tolerated, with no significant target organs of toxicity at up to 17 times the optimal exposure in mouse efficacy models. Toxicokinetic (TK) analyses indicate that DTP3 does not accumulate on repeat dosing. Safety pharmacology studies indicate no adverse effect on the central nervous, cardiovascular or respiratory systems. In an Ames assay, DTP3 was not mutagenic. In the rat, i.v. DTP3 rapidly and extensively distributes to tissues, does not pass the blood-brain barrier, and is readily eliminated in urine (30%) and faeces (60%). No major metabolites have been identified. In vitro, DTP3 did not inhibit or induce major human cytochrome P450 isoforms, suggesting no potential for drug interactions via P450. In vitro, DTP3 is neither a substrate for nor inhibitor of P-gp or BCRP, nor is it a substrate or inhibitor of most transporters evaluated. However, DTP3 is a substrate for the uptake transporters, MATE1, MATE2-K and OATP1B3, with some inhibitory potential for MATE1 and MATE2-K at high concentrations. PD studies in a mouse xenograft model show that i.v. bolus injection of at least 10 mg/kg of DTP3 over 2 weeks, daily, every other day, or every 3 days, is highly effective in causing complete tumour regression. The PK and TK evaluation of DTP3 in rat and dog identified long plasma half-lives, modelled into a half-life of 20-24 hr in man. On these bases, we have proposed an initial clinical dosing regimen of DTP3 of three times per week i.v., testing doses from 0.5 to 20 mg/kg. The data also support a subcutaneous route of administration, and an i.v. bolus regimen of twice per week. Collectively, the preclinical package demonstrates the outstanding selective pharmacology and efficacy of DTP3, combined with excellent i.v. tolerability, wide therapeutic window, and favourable PK profile, and supports progression into clinical development. A companion biomarker programme has also been developed in order to inform patient stratification, demonstrate pathway-specific PD activity and proof of mechanism, and so maximise the chance of a positive clinical response. Disclosures Tornatore: Kesios Therapeutics Ltd.: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties. Adams:Kesios Therapeutics Ltd.: Consultancy. Kelly:Kesios Therapeutics Ltd.: Consultancy. Ruvo:Kesios Therapeutics Ltd.: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Oakervee:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Schey:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria. Apperley:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Franzoso:Kesios Therapeutics Ltd.: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties.

The Office of National Statistics (London, UK) has reported 4040 new patients in the year 2007, with an annual age standardized incidence rate of 4.8 per 100,000 population (range 4.7 - 5.0). Overall survival (OS) in the last decade has improved from 2 - 3 years to 7 - 8 years in the UK. The introduction of IMids for the treatment of myeloma has had a significant impact on outcomes in this life-threatening disease.Pomalidomide, a thalidomide analogue, is a promising anti-myeloma agent with encouraging responses in relapsed/refractory myeloma patients. Pomalidomide has a potent anti-myeloma activity in vitro and in vivo, acting both directly on myeloma cells and on the cells in the bone marrow microenvironment. We have reviewed the chemistry and mechanisms of action of pomalidomide and the literature on pre-clinical and early Phase I and II clinical trials that demonstrates significant clinical efficacy in the relapsed setting and in lenalidomide refractory myeloma patients.Pomalidomide has shown significant activity in relapsed/refractory disease and is now being taken into Phase III trials in combination with dexamethasone. The exact place of pomalidomide in the management of myeloma, however, is evolving as more clinical experience is gained with this agent and further data published from clinical trials.

We report the results of a Phase I/II dose escalation study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of cyclophosphamide when combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory myeloma. Thirty-one patients were enrolled in cohorts of 3, at five dose levels of cyclophosphamide to a maximum of 700 mg on days 1 and 8 of a 28-d cycle. Patients received lenalidomide 25 mg days 1-21 and dexamethasone 20 mg orally days 1-4 and 8-11. The MTD was 600 mg cyclophosphamide, days 1 and 8. Grade 3/4 haematological complications occurred in 26% of patients, grade 3/4 infection in 3% (both at 700 mg cyclophosphamide), with thromboembolic complications in 6% of patients. Overall complete response (CR) rate was 29%, very good partial response rate 7% and partial response rate 45% giving an overall response rate of 81%. After 21 months median follow-up, projected 2-year progression-free survival was 56%, with 80% overall survival at 30 months. Ten further patients were treated at MTD with a 40% CR rate. No dose reductions for any study drugs or deaths occurred during cycles 1-9. Lenalidomide, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone is a safe, effective combination in relapsed myeloma inducing a high response rate, warranting further investigation in phase III trials.

We previously reported that daily dose pomalidomide (CC-4047), a thalidomide analogue, has excellent anti-myeloma activity but is associated with myelosuppression and deep vein thrombosis. We report here a phase 1 study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of pomalidomide at 1 mg, 2 mg, 5 mg and 10 mg on alternate days (ad). Twenty patients with relapsed myeloma were treated. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in all patients receiving 10 mg and the MTD was defined as 5 mg ad. No thrombotic events were observed. Pomalidomide was continued following the 4-week MTD study in 17/20 patients for a median of 14 months. 10% of patients had a complete response and >50% reduction in paraprotein was achieved in 50% of subjects. Progression-free survival was 10.5 months and median overall survival was 33 months. A significant rise was observed in the proportion of CD8(+) cells. Alternate day pomalidomide was associated with a marked reduction in the incidence of thrombosis whilst maintaining excellent anti-myeloma activity. This trial provides further in vivo evidence that pomalidomide modulates the immune system in myeloma patients. Phase 2 studies to further assess the optimal schedule of administration and anti-myeloma activity of this agent are planned.

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) are a rare and heterogeneous subset of lymphomas with a poorer prognosis compared with B-cell lymphomas. We conducted a retrospective study of 82 patients who received high-dose therapy for PTCL (autologous SCT (ASCT) N=64; allogeneic SCT (Allo-SCT) N=18). With a median follow-up from ASCT of 37 months from transplant, 33 patients were alive; 20 died of progressive disease, 10 died from non-relapse mortality (NRM) with 1 unknown cause. Three-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 53% (95% confidence interval (CI) 42, 67) and 50% (95% CI 39, 64), respectively. Factors significantly affecting OS and PFS on univariate analysis were histological subtype and chemotherapy sensitivity. In a multivariate analysis, the only factor with significant impact was chemotherapy sensitivity. After a median follow-up from Allo-SCT of 57 months, five patients were alive; five died of progressive disease and eight died from NRM. The 3-year OS and PFS were 39% (95% CI 22, 69) and 33% (95% CI 17, 64), respectively, and the 3-year relapse rate was 28% (95% CI 6, 50). These results demonstrate that high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue has a substantial role in the management of T-cell lymphoma. The use of full-intensity allogeneic transplantation is limited by high transplant-related mortality, and exploration of reduced intensity regimens is warranted.

Background Multiple myeloma, the second most common haematological cancer, remains incurable. Its incidence is rising due to population ageing. Despite the impact of the disease and its treatment, not much is known on who is most in need of supportive and palliative care. This study aimed to (a) assess symptom severity, palliative care concerns and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with multiple myeloma, and (b) to determine which factors are associated with a lower quality of life. We further wanted to know (c) whether general symptom level has a stronger influence on HRQOL than disease characteristics. Methods This multi-centre cross-sectional study sampled two cohorts of patients with multiple myeloma from 18 haematological cancer centres in the UK. The Myeloma Patient Outcome Scale (MyPOS) was used to measure symptoms and concerns. Measures of quality of life included the EORTC QLQ-C30, its myeloma module and the EuroQoL EQ-5D. Data were collected on socio-demographic, disease and treatment characteristics and phase of illness. Point prevalence of symptoms and concerns was determined. Multiple regression models quantified relationships between independent factors and the MyPOS, EORTC global quality of life item and EQ5D Index. Results Five-hundred-fifty-seven patients, on average 3.5 years (SD: 3.4) post-diagnosis, were recruited. 18.2 % had newly diagnosed disease, 47.9 % were in a treatment-free interval and 32.7 % had relapsed/progressive disease phase. Patients reported a mean of 7.2 symptoms (SD: 3.3) out of 15 potential symptoms. The most common symptoms were pain (72 %), fatigue (88 %) and breathlessness (61 %). Those with relapsed/progressive disease reported the highest mean number of symptoms and the highest overall palliative care concerns (F = 9.56, p

Background Multiple myeloma is an incurable cancer with a rising incidence globally. Less toxic treatments are increasingly available, so patients are living longer and treatment decisions are increasingly guided by QOL concerns. There is no QOL assessment tool designed specifically for use in the clinical care of people with myeloma. This study aimed to develop and test the psychometric properties of a new myeloma-specific QOL questionnaire designed specifically for use in the clinical setting – the MyPOS. Methods The MyPOS was developed using findings from a previously reported literature review and qualitative study. The prototype MyPOS was pretested using cognitive interviews in a purposive sample of myeloma patients and refined prior to field testing. The psychometric properties of the MyPOS were evaluated in a multi-centre, cross sectional survey of myeloma patients recruited from 14 hospital trusts across England. Results The prototype MyPOS contained 33 structured and open questions. These were refined using cognitive interviews with 12 patients, and the final MyPOS contained 30 items taken forward for field-testing. The cross-sectional survey recruited 380 patients for the MyPOS validation. Mean time to complete was 7 minutes 19 seconds with 0.58% missing MyPOS items overall. Internal consistency was high (α = 0.89). Factor analysis confirmed three subscales: Symptoms & Function; Emotional Response and Healthcare Support. MyPOS total scores were higher (worse QOL) in those with active disease compared to those in the stable or plateau phase (F = 11.89, p

Advances in treatments for multiple myeloma (MM) have resulted in improved survival. However, patients who have become refractory to novel agents have a poor prognosis, with a median overall survival (OS) of nine months, or as low as three months in the absence of further treatment after failure of

Background Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an important element for consideration in treatment decisions in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). The pivotal MM-003 (A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Pomalidomide in Combination With Low-Dose Dexamethasone vs. High-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients With Refractory Multiple Myeloma or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma and Companion Study [NIMBUS]) randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase III trial demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS) and prolonged overall survival (OS) with pomalidomide (POM) plus low-dose dexamethasone (POM + LoDEX) versus high-dose dexamethasone (HiDEX) in patients with RRMM in whom lenalidomide (LEN) and bortezomib (BORT) had failed. MM-003 also investigated HRQoL as a predefined secondary end point. Patients and Methods Recruited patients (n = 455) were refractory to their last treatment and had failed LEN and BORT after ≥ 2 consecutive cycles of each (alone or in combination). Eight clinically relevant and validated HRQoL domains from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-MY20, and EQ-5D questionnaires were selected for analysis. Time to symptom worsening based on minimally important differences (MIDs) was calculated. Results Clinically meaningful improvements in HRQoL as determined by MIDs, regression analyses, and best response analyses were observed more frequently in patients receiving POM + LoDEX than in those receiving HiDEX. POM + LoDEX significantly extended median time to clinically meaningful worsening in HRQoL versus HiDEX in 4 HRQoL domains and demonstrated a trend in an additional 3 domains. Patients in the HiDEX arm experienced earlier HRQoL deterioration compared with those in the POM + LoDEX arm in each domain analyzed. Conclusion POM + LoDEX offer good clinical outcomes that lead to improved and prolonged HRQoL compared with HiDEX in patients with RRMM and end-stage disease.

A major limitation to the treatment of multiple myeloma by the thalidomide analogue CC-4047 (Actimid) is the development of a severe neutropenia. We investigated the hypothesis that this effect may have been due to CC-4047 enhancing the removal of neutrophils from the circulation by altering the expression of surface adhesion molecules required for endothelial binding, by binding to platelets, or by enhancing apoptosis. Flow cytometric analysis was used to examine the expression of neutrophil surface molecules, platelet binding and apoptosis in whole blood samples from 19 patients with multiple myeloma who were assigned to receive either 1, 2, 5 or 10 mg of CC-4047 every other day (e.o.d.) for 28 days. CC-4047 induced dose-related decreases in neutrophil numbers and increases in the percentage of CD64-positive neutrophils, but had little, or no effect on the expression of CD11b, CD62L or CD162, neutrophil-platelet binding, or apoptosis. Relative decreases in the neutrophil count were inversely associated with relative increases in the intensity of CD64 expression on neutrophils (r=- 0.307; p=0.028). Although seven patients developed severe neutropenia, none suffered severe or recurrent bacterial infections. The percentage of CD64-positive neutrophils was still increased in eight patients who continued receiving 1-5 mg CC-4047 e.o.d. for several months afterwards, but neutrophil counts were similar to pre-treatment values.

Epidemiology data on multiple myeloma (MM) occurrence and outcome is inconsistent whilst a major limitation of randomized controlled trials is selection bias. We present a population-based analysis of patients diagnosed with MM in the South Thames area, which comprises 5.4 million adult inhabitants. A total of 855 cases of MM were ascertained between 1999 and 2000 in a collaborative project involving haematologists and the Thames Cancer Registry. The age-standardized rate was 3.29 per 100 000 and 4.82 cases per 100 000 (World Standard and European Population respectively). The median age was 73 years. The median survival for the whole group was 24 months whist it was 42 and 18 months in those aged less than 65 years and greater than 65 years respectively (P < 0.001). This population study has shown a higher incidence than previously reported in the UK and Europe and provides a benchmark for future studies. If survival is to be improved, future clinical trials and health care planning should consider patients over 65 years of age.

Phase II study of ISIS 3521, an antisense oligodeoxynucleotide to protein kinase C alpha, in patients with previously treated low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of ISIS 3521, an antisense phosphorothioate oligonucleotide to protein kinase C a in patients with relapsed low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Patients and methods: Twenty-six patients received ISIS 3521 (2 mg/kg/day) as a continuous infusion over 21 days of each 28-day cycle. Results: The median age of the patients was 53 years (range 37-77). Histological subtypes were low-grade follicular lymphoma (n = 22) and B-cell small lymphocytic lymphoma (n = 4). Twenty-one (81%) had stage IH/IV disease. The median number of previous lines of chemotherapy was two (range one to six). A total of 87 cycles of ISIS 3521 were administered. Twenty-three patients were assessable for response. Three patients achieved a partial response. No complete responses were observed. Ten patients had stable disease. Grade 3-4 toxicity was as follows: neutropenia (3.8%) and thrombocytopenia (26.9%). Conclusions: ISIS 3521 has demonstrated anti-tumour activity in patients with relapsed low-grade NHL. There may be a potential role for this agent in combination with conventional chemotherapy for advanced low- grade lymphoma, and further trials are warranted.

The prognosis for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and advanced Hodgkin's disease (HD) who relapse following autologous transplant is poor. We report on a pilot study designed to evaluate the feasibility of using Cyclosporin A and interferon alpha to induce autologous GVHD following a second autologous transplant for relapsed lymphoma. In all, 10 patients entered the study with median age 46.5 years. Diagnosis was NHL (n=7) or Hodgkin's lymphoma (n=3). All had relapsed from a prior autologous transplant. The second transplant was well tolerated by all patients. Histological changes consistent with cutaneous GVHD developed in 30% of patients at a median of 22.5 days from transplant and settled spontaneously in all cases. Five patients have died (four from progressive disease) at a median 7 months from second transplant. Five patients are still alive and in complete remission at a median of 20 months from transplant. Median overall survival for the group is 13.5 months and median relapse-free survival has not been reached at 42 months. This is a well-tolerated regimen for use in this poor-risk group of patients with lymphoma. The overall survival and event-free survival are encouraging, however further studies are necessary.

Myeloma remains incurable with conventional treatment in the vast majority of patients. The introduction of thalidomide in 1999 for the treatment of relapsed disease offers the opportunity to treat patients who have developed myelotoxicity or who are refractory to conventional chemotherapy. The optimal schedule remains unresolved and only two studies have reported long term follow-up data. We report a phase II low dose escalation study of thalidomide with long term follow-up showing overall survival (OS) of 19 months and progression free survival (PFS) of 14 months. In addition we report on the side effects and toxicity and give recommendations for the use of thalidomide in the relapsed setting based upon these findings.

Although nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen transplantations (NMTs) induce engraftment of allogeneic stem cells with a low spectrum of toxicity, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. In vivo T-cell depletion, using alemtuzumab, has been shown to reduce the incidence of GVHD. However, this type of maneuver, although reducing GVHD, may have an adverse impact on disease response, because NMTs exhibit their antitumor activity by relying on a graft-versus-malignancy effect. To explore the efficacy of alemtuzumab compared with methotrexate (MTX) for GVHD prophylaxis, we have compared the results in 129 recipients of a sibling NMT enrolled in 2 prospective studies for chronic lymphoproliferative disorders. Both NMTs were based on the same combination of fludarabine and melphalan, but the United Kingdom regimen (group A) used cyclosporin A plus alemtuzumab, whereas the Spanish regimen (group B) used cyclosporin A plus MTX for GVHD prophylaxis. Patients receiving alemtuzumab had a higher incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation (85% versus 24%,P

We describe the toxicity and efficacy of donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs) given to 81 patients (median age, 50 years) after reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) transplantations performed at 16 centers in the United Kingdom. The diseases treated included non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL; n = 29), chronic myeloid leukemia (CML; n = 12), myeloma (n = 11), acute myeloid leukemia (AML; n = 10), and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL; n = 9). Eighty-eight percent received stem cells from sibling donors. The patients received 130 infusions (median, 1; range, 1-4). Indications for DLI were unsatisfactory response/disease progression in 51 patients, mixed chimerism in 18, preemptive in 10, and other in 2. Graft hypoplasia was uncommon (11%). Grade II to IV graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) occurred in 23 of 81 patients (28%) and limited and extensive chronic GVHD in 5 of 69 and 18 of 69 evaluable patients (total incidence 33%). Conversion from mixed to full donor chimerism occurred in 19 of 55 evaluable patients (35%) at a median of 48 days after the DLI; partial responses occurred in 6 patients (total response rate 45%). Eighteen of 51 (35%) patients with measurable disease after stem cell transplantation had a complete response (2 molecular), and 5 a partial response (total response rate 45%). Eleven of 17 evaluable complete responders had full donor chimerism. Eight of 13 patients with follicular NHL had complete responses as did 4 of 12 patients with CML. Clinical and chimeric responses correlated strongly with acute and chronic GVHD. Forty-seven patients (58%) survive at a median of 508 days after transplantation (range, 155-1171 days) with a median Karnofsky score of 90. Thirty-four patients (42%) died at a median of 211 days after transplantation with the major causes being progressive disease (26%) and GVHD (9%). Further systematic studies are required to determine the efficacy and optimum use of DLI for patients with each disease treated by nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation.

The discovery that multiple myeloma is associated with new vessel formation and is correlated with survival and proliferation led initially to the use of thalidomide for patients with relapsed or refractory disease. The outcome with conventional chemotherapy in this setting has historically been very poor. New insights into the biology of the disease suggests that thalidomide may work via a number of other mechanisms and the advent of the thalidomide analogues with their differential effects on survival and proliferation pathways has opened up a new era in the understanding and treatment of the disease. The encouraging results from phase I/II trials of these agents has meant that for the first time in 50 years there is the opportunity to improve outcome. Further work is in progress to define how best to use these drugs and their role in treatment at different stages of the disease.

Background Multiple myeloma is an incurable haematological cancer that affects physical, psychological and social domains of quality of life (QOL). Treatment decisions are increasingly guided by QOL issues, creating a need to monitor QOL within clinical practice. The development of myeloma-specific QOL questionnaires has been limited by a paucity of research to fully characterise QOL in this group. Aims of the present study are to (1) explore the issues important to QOL from the perspective of people with multiple myeloma, and (2) explore the views of patients and clinical staff on existing QOL questionnaires and their use in clinical practice. Methods The ‘Issues Interviews’ were semi-structured qualitative interviews to explore the issues important to QOL in a purposive sample of myeloma patients (n = 20). The ‘Questionnaire Interviews’ were semi-structured qualitative interviews in a separate purposive sample of myeloma patients (n = 20) to explore views on existing QOL questionnaires and their clinical use. Two patient focus groups (n = 7, n = 4) and a focus group of clinical staff (n = 6) complemented the semi-structured interviews. Thematic content analysis resulted in the development of a theoretical model of QOL in myeloma. Results Main themes important to QOL were Biological Status, Treatment Factors, Symptoms Status, Activity & Participation, Emotional Status, Support Factors, Expectations, Adaptation & Coping and Spirituality. Symptoms had an indirect effect on QOL, only affecting overall QOL if they impacted upon Activity & Participation, Emotional Status or Support Factors. This indirect relationship has implications for the design of QOL questionnaires, which often focus on symptom status. Health-service factors emerged as important but are often absent from QOL questionnaires. Sexual function was important to patients and difficult for clinicians to discuss, so inclusion in clinical QOL tools may flag hidden problems and facilitate better care. Patients and staff expressed preferences for questionnaires to be no more than 2 pages long and to include a mixture of structured and open questions to focus the goals of care on what is most important to patients. Conclusion Existing QOL questionnaires developed and validated for use in myeloma do not capture all that is important to patients and may not be well suited to clinical use.

PSC 833 (Valspodar) can reverse multidrug resistance (MDR) in patients with hematologic malignancies, but alters the pharmacokinetics of concomitant anticancer agents. A phase I, dose-finding study was initiated to define a safe and effective regimen of mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine (MEC) when administered with PSC 833 to patients with early relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Poor-prognosis AML patients refractory to first-line induction therapy or relapsing within 9 months of attaining complete remission (CR) were treated with cytarabine (1.0 g/m2/day), etoposide (30 mg/m2/day), and mitoxantrone at a dose of either 3.0 mg/m2/day (cohort 1) or 4.5 mg/m2/day (cohorts 2 and 3) for 6 days plus continuous-infusion PSC 833 (10 mg/kg/24 h with a 2.0 mg/kg loading dose) for 6 or 7 days each 21-day cycle. Patients achieving CR were given a 4-day MEC plus PSC 833 consolidation cycle. Twenty-three patients were enrolled (eight with primary refractory AML and 15 in relapse). Dose-limiting toxicity occurred in one of six patients in cohort 2 (grade 4 mucositis) and one of seven patients in cohort 3 (grade 4 hyperbilirubinemia). The maximum tolerated dose of mitoxantrone was defined as 4.5 mg/m2/day. Clinically significant grade 4 hyperbilirubinemia, possibly related to PSC 833, occurred in four patients. Hematologic toxicities were as expected in this patient population, but were not dose limiting. Mild to moderate cerebellar ataxia and paresthesia occurred in six (26%) and five (22%) patients, respectively, but were not dose limiting. Overall, six of 23 (26%) patients achieved CR, including five patients with demonstrated P-glycoprotein expression and/or function. The median overall survival was 4 months. All six patients with a CR were alive and four (17%) patients were disease free at 12 months. Blood levels of PSC 833 were well above the target level of 1000 ng/ml, a concentration that is known to reverse MDR in vitro. PSC 833 reduced the clearance of etoposide by approximately two-fold. No correlation was observed between the mitoxantrone or etoposide area under the curve and response. In conclusion, the MEC plus PSC 833 tested regimen was well tolerated and the 26% CR rate warrants further testing of this regimen in a randomized, phase III trial.

High dose chemoradiotherapy with autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation (PBPCT) may improve outcome in myeloma. Melphalan is an effective drug in the treatment of myeloma, but is potentially toxic to progenitor cells. We studied 8 patients receiving intermittent intravenous melphalan (25 mg/m 2 ) as induction therapy before PBPCT to assess engraftment characteristics post-transplantation. Comparison was made with an age-matched control group of patients with non-Hodgkins lymphoma who had not received melphalan during induction therapy. There was correlation (P = 0.03 7) between the dose of melphalan per kg body weight given, premobilization, and days to neutrophil engraftment, but no significant difference between the two groups in neutrophil recovery. The study group had delayed platelet recovery (P = 0.01) and required more platelet support post-transplantation (P = 0.05). 3-4 weekly melphalan (25 mg/m 2 ) up to 6 courses was delivered to patients who went on to PBPCT without significantly influencing neutrophil recovery but with a negative impact on platelet recovery.

Introduction. The outlook for myeloma patients who relapse after or become refractory to bortezomib and IMiDs is poor, with limited therapeutic options and a median survival (OS) of 9 months. In the phase 3 MM-003 study, pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone resulted in a significant PFS (median 4 vs 1.9 months) and OS (median 13.1 vs 8.1 months) benefit, compared to high-dose dexamethasone. Information on real-world outcomes of pomalidomide therapy is limited. We carried out a retrospective analysis of patients receiving pomalidomide in the UK, to compare outcomes and tolerability with published clinical trial data, and focus on high risk subgroups. Methods. All patients treated with pomalidomide at 5 major UK centres between August 2013 and March 2016 were identified from chemotherapy records, and clinical data including toxicity and survival from patient records. Disease response and adverse FISH were defined as per IMWG. Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier, and correlations made using log-rank methods. Key subgroups: eGFR Results. A total of 85 patients were identified. Of these, 70 (82%) had measurable disease (IMWG criteria) and received ≥1 cycle so were included in response analyses. Baseline patient characteristics are reported in Table 1. 96.5% of patients were refractory to one or more IMiDs, and 72.9% were refractory to both IMiDs and bortezomib. 92.9% were refractory to their last treatment. The median dose of pomalidomide was 4mg (2-4). Grade 3-4 non-haematological toxicities occurred in 42.4%: pneumonia (16.5%), neutropenic sepsis (8.2%), and acute kidney injury (7.1%), were most common. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 38% and thrombocytopenia in 24%. Seven patients died on treatment, 6 during the first cycle (2 PD and sepsis, 2 neutropenic sepsis, 1 PD and AKI, 2 pneumonia). In the 70 patients assessable for response, ORR was 52.9% (5.7% VGPR, 47.1% PR, 38.6% SD). Median duration of response (DoR) was 4 months. With median follow-up of 13 months, median PFS was 5 months (95%CI 3.6-6.4), and median OS 13 months (95%CI 10.8-15.2). Patients with renal failure (eGFR 65yrs had similar outcomes to younger patients,(ORR 54.1 vs 51.5%, median PFS and OS comparable between groups). Rates of toxicity were also not influenced by renal impairment, adverse genetics, or older age. The most important predictors of PFS and OS were depth and durability of response. PFS was 6 months for patients achieving PR, 4 months for SD and 1 month for PD, while OS was 18 months in patients achieving PR, 13 months for SD and 3 months for PD. For patients with DoR >4 months, PFS was 11 months and OS 23 months. In contrast, in patients whose DoR was < 4 months or who did not respond, OS was 9 months. Conclusions. Our real-world data on the characteristics and outcomes of patients receiving pomalidomide for relapsed/refractory myeloma in the UK reflect results of published clinical trials. The ORR of 52.9% in our cohort is higher than in MM-003 and MM-010, but PFS (5 months) and OS (13 months) were remarkably similar. Rates of haematological toxicity and infections are low, confirming the good tolerability of pomalidomide in this patient group. Depth and sustainability of response were important predictors of survival: achievement of PR was associated with improved PFS and OS, while patients who achieved SD still derived a survival benefit. Patients who maintained a response for at least 4 months had an estimated survival of nearly 2 years. No difference in response, survival or tolerability was seen in key subgroups, including those with moderate renal impairment, adverse cytogenetics and older age. Our findings confirm the efficacy of pomalidomide in these heavily pre-treated patients and add to the evidence for the benefit of pomalidomide in high risk patient groups. Table Patient characteristics and comparison with MM003 trial Table. Patient characteristics and comparison with MM003 trial Figure 1 PFS and OS for the edited group of 70 patients Figure 1. PFS and OS for the edited group of 70 patients Disclosures Maciocia: Autolus: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties: TRBC1 and 2 Targeting for the Diagnosis and Treatment of T-cell Malignancies. Ramasamy:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Jenner:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support, Research Funding. Schey:Celgene, Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene, Johnson & Johnson: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy. Yong:Autolus Ltd: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties: APRIL based chimeric antigen receptor; Janssen: Research Funding.

A major challenge in modern myeloma management is the selection of the best initial treatment from a plethora of available therapies. PAD (bortezomib, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone) is a highly effective regimen which may obviate the need for an upfront high-dose melphalan stem cell transplant (HDSCT). However, it is not clear a priori which patients will benefit from this treatment. In the phase 2 PADIMAC trial, patients with newly diagnosed myeloma were treated with six cycles of PAD and stratified to receive HDSCT in partial remission (PR) or watch and wait in very good partial remission (VGPR) or better. To identify predictive biomarkers, we extracted somatic RNA prior to treatment and performed massively parallel RNA sequencing (RNAseq). Basic quality control metrics suggested a high-quality RNAseq dataset. Furthermore, spiked expression of IgH fusion partners was consistent with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) data for each sample. All t(4;14) and t(4;16) cases were correctly identified by RNAseq on the basis of the relevant fusion transcript. As a final quality control measure, recurrent variants (e.g. NRAS, KRAS, TP53, FAM46C, DIS3) were identified in the expected proportions. We performed a pre-planned analysis of differential gene expression between those patients achieving a VGPR or better, sustained for at least 12 months without HDSCT (excellent responders), and those patients who achieved less than a PR (poor responders). 85 genes were upregulated in poor responders and 225 in excellent responders. Interestingly, there was no significant overlap between our PAD-predictive signature and the Arkansas 70 gene poor prognosis signature, the Arkansas 17 gene poor prognosis signature, or the EMC92 prognostic signature. This is likely to reflect in part, the greater sensitivity of RNAseq for gene expression compared to microarrays. However, it also implies that there is a selective signature for PAD responsiveness. We employed the Gage and Pathview packages to identify non-redundant pathways associated with PAD responsiveness. Significantly upregulated genes in poor responders were those involved in: DNA replication, base excision repair, and the Fanconi anaemia pathway. Genes upregulated in excellent responders included those involved in: several signalling pathways (including RAS, NF-Kappa B, FOXO and JAK-STAT pathways); chemokine and cell adhesion; protein processing in the endoplasmic reticulum; and immune activation pathways such as T-cell receptor signalling and natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Finally, we investigated the ability of expression signatures to stratify patients on the basis of PAD responsiveness. Our analysis suggests that RNASeq-defined transcriptional profiles could aid in the selection of patients for PAD therapy (leading to an increase in overall response rate from 70% to 86%), as well as the stratification of patients in CR to a non-HDSCT protocol. We anticipate that our current analysis could easily incorporate specific response signatures for other regimens and could make personalized therapy for myeloma a reality in the foreseeable future. Disclosures Yong: Autolus Ltd: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties: APRIL based chimeric antigen receptor; Janssen: Research Funding. Streetly:Guys and St. Thomas' NHS Trust: Honoraria. Schey:Celgene, Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy; Celgene, Johnson & Johnson: Speakers Bureau. Cook:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Glycomimetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Cook:Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Myeloma UK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

The primary objective of this study was to determine the complete remission (CR) rate achieved with the FLAG (fludarabine phosphate, cytarabine and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) regimen in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) or de novo refractory anaemia with excess of blasts in transformation (RAEB-t). Secondary objectives were to evaluate survival and toxicity. Induction treatment consisted of between one and two courses of FLAG. Patients achieving CR received between one and two courses of consolidation treatment. Eighty-three of the 89 patients entering the study were eligible for assessment. CR rates were: 17 out of 21 (81%) in late relapse AML (Group 1), 13 out of 44 (30%) in early relapse/refractory AML (Group 2), and 10 out of 18 (56%) in de novo RAEB-t (Group 3). Thirty-four of the 40 responders (85%) achieved CR after one induction course. Median survival times were 1.4 years, 3 months and 1.6 years in Groups 1, 2 and 3 respectively. Other than myelosuppression, the FLAG regimen was not generally associated with clinically significant toxicity and was well tolerated by most patients including the elderly. The FLAG regimen offers a very effective alternative treatment for CR induction in poor prognosis adult patients with either relapsed or refractory AML or de novo RAEB-t. FLAG delivers high-dose treatment without increasing overall toxicity, an approach which is of particular value in older patients, who constitute the majority in these diseases. It is therefore an important advance in developing new treatment options for these patients.

The allocation of funding for new anticancer treatments within the UK has not kept pace with demand. Clinicians find themselves restricted in the use of licensed drugs which they feel are in the best interests of individual patients. Against this, health authorities have a duty to ensure that scarce resources are used equitably to meet the needs of the local population as a whole. Differential levels of funding for new treatments across the country have led to concerns about rationing by postcode. This paper outlines an approach to the prioritization of new treatment for advanced cancer developed jointly by clinicians and health authorities in South London. The approach involves evidence reviews and consensus meetings. Existing and new treatments are rated on a four-point ‘relative effectiveness scale’, which takes account of the impact of the treatment on quality of life and on survival. The strength of evidence supporting each effectiveness rating is also classified. Health Authorities have used these ratings to determine overall funding levels, while leaving decisions on individual patients to the relevant Trusts. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign

The failure of conventional chemotherapy to eradicate chronic lymphocytic leukaemia cells and induce cure has led many clinicians to investigate the use of high dose chemotherapy and haemopoietic stem cell rescue in this disease. The selection of patients remains a major problem because this is a disease of elderly patients with a median overall survival of 7 years and will only therefore be applicable to a minority of patients. However transplantation is the most likely therapeutic option at this time to lead to cure in this condition. The best type of transplant is not known and not all patients will be able to mobilise adequate numbers of stem cells or have a suitable donor identified. Autologous transplantation relies on the ability of high doses of chemotherapy to eradicate disease whilst allogeneic transplantation attempts to harvest the graft versus leukaemia effect that has been identified in chronic granulocytic leukaemia. However, the high treatment related mortality and morbidity of allogeneic ...

Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia is a condition which has a median age of 65 years but approximately 10% of patients are younger than 50. Fludarabine has been shown to produce better response rates than conventional single agent or combination chemotherapy but as yet no improved survival. We have treated a series of 10 patients presenting with de novo (six) or relapsed (four) chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) with fludarabine as cytoreduction treatment and consolidation of the response with CD34 selected peripheral blood stem cell transplantation using cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation (TBI) as conditioning therapy. We report here on the progenitor cell harvest characteristics and clinical and molecular responses to both fludarabine and high-dose consolidation. Our results indicate that at 3 months post transplant clinical remissions were induced in 10/10 patients and molecular responses in 7/8 (88%) evaluable patients. Molecular relapses occurred on long-term follow-up at 6, 9, 12 and 24 months post transplant but patients continued in clinical and haematological remission. Two patients have died from progressive disease and a third patient from aggressive high grade lymphoma. Median survival from the time of transplantation for the group overall was 22 months (range 6-45). There was no procedure-related mortality in the first 100 days.

Fluconazole is widely used as antifungal prophylaxis but it is ineffective against Aspergillus. Itraconazole has a broader spectrum of activity but the capsules give erratic bioavailability in neutropenic patients. We compared itraconazole oral solution (which has an improved pharmacokinetic profile) with fluconazole for antifungal prophylaxis. Adults with haematological malignancies receiving chemotherapy or bone marrow transplants were randomly allocated 5 mg/kg/d itraconazole (itra) solution (288 episodes) or 100 mg fluconazole suspension (flu) (293 episodes) from before the onset of neutropenia until neutrophil recovery or suspected fungal infection. Outcomes were assessed by independent reviewers unaware of the prophylaxis allocation. More proven systemic fungal infections occurred in flu (Aspergillus four, Candida tropicalis one, C. krusei one) than itra (C. albicans one) and more of these were fatal (four versus nil). This difference reached statistical significance when first study episodes were considered separately (six flu versus nil itra, P = 0.03). Significantly more deaths of presumed fungal origin occurred in flu than itra (seven versus nil, P = 0.024). There were significantly more cases of proven aspergillosis in flu than itra (six versus nil, P = 0.038, 5/6 cases were fatal) if those occurring outside the study period are included. Significantly more patients receiving flu required amphotericin B (58 v 39, P = 0.043) but this may have been affected by the fact that the study was not blinded. There were 11 proven mucosal candidal infections in flu and four in itra. Itraconazole solution and fluconazole provide effective prophylaxis against Candida but itraconazole affords greater protection against fatal aspergillosis.

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the response of four patients with IgM paraproteinaemic neuropathy to a novel therapy—pulsed intravenous fludarabine. BACKGROUND The peripheral neuropathy associated with IgM paraproteinaemia usually runs a chronic, slowly progressive course which may eventually cause severe disability. Treatment with conventional immunosuppressive regimens has been unsatisfactory. Fludarabine is a novel purine analogue which has recently been shown to be effective in low grade lymphoid malignancies. METHODS Four patients were treated with IgM paraproteinaemic neuropathy with intravenous pulses of fludarabine. Two of the four patients had antibodies to MAG and characteristic widely spaced myelin on nerve biopsy and a third had characteristic widely spaced myelin only. The fourth had an endoneurial lymphocytic infiltrate on nerve biopsy and a diagnosis of Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinaemia. RESULTS In all cases subjective and objective clinical improvement occurred associated with a significant fall in the IgM paraprotein concentration in three cases. Neurophysiological parameters improved in the three patients examined. The treatment was well tolerated. All patients developed mild, reversible lymphopenia and 50% mild generalised myelosuppression, but there were no febrile episodes. CONCLUSION Fludarabine should be considered as a possible treatment for patients with IgM MGUS paraproteinaemic neuropathy.

The study of myeloma survival reported by Gahrton et al (2001) in this issue of the British Journal of Cancer is both enlightening and challenging to clinicians managing this condition. Awareness of myeloma has been increased over the last few years as more refined diagnostic criteria (Rajkumar et al, 2007), improved investigational techniques (Ng et al, 2006) and better treatments have become available. Myeloma incidence increases with age, (Phekoo et al, 2004) but even allowing for an increasingly ageing UK population there seems to be an increased incidence in younger patients, the cause of which is unknown.

A 64-year-old male presented with neurofibromatosis 1 and Cushing's syndrome. Clinically he was over weight, depressed with extensive skin bruising and hypertension. His 24 hours urinary metanephrines, urinary 5HIAA, gut peptides and chromgranin levels were normal. His renal function and renal MRI scan was also normal. His cortisol failed to suppress on overnight dexamethsone suppression test. His low dose dexamethasone suppression with CRH stimulation showed failure of suppression of cortisol to < 50 nmol/L and ACTH was measurable at 10 ng/L on day 3. There was no response of ACTH or cortisol to CRH stimulation. His ACTH precursors were high at 126 pmol/L consistent with defective pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) processing suggesting an ectopic source of ACTH production. The MRI scan of his pituitary and CT scan of the adrenal glands was normal. His octreotide scan was negative. The source of his ectopic ACTH was most likely a large retroperitoneal plexiform neurofibroma seen on CT abdomen that had undergone malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour transformation on histology. He was a poor surgical risk for tumour debulking procedure. In view of the available literature and role of c-kit signalling in neurofibromatosis, he was treated with Imitinib. Four months after the treatment his Cushings had resolved on biochemical testing. After a year his plexiform neurofibroma has not increased in size. To our knowledge, this is the first case of NF1 associated with clinical and biochemical features of Cushing's secondary to ectopic ACTH due to MPNST in a plexiform neurofibroma and its resolution on treatment with imatinib.

Introduction Treatment advances in multiple myeloma have increased expected survival from months to years for some patients. Alongside improved survival emerges a need to better understand and measure health-related quality of life (HRQOL), both in research and clinical settings. Objectives (i) Identify HRQOL tools validated for use in myeloma; (ii) identify issues important to HRQOL from the point of view of patients with myeloma; (iii) describe the measurement properties of each HRQOL tool; (iv) evaluate the content validity of HRQOL tools in terms of their ability to capture all issues important to patients and (v) explore the suitability of each HRQOL tool for use in different settings. Method Systematic literature review of six databases with no limits by date or language. Results Thirty-nine studies reported validation of 13 HRQOL instruments. Seven studies identified issues important to HRQOL from the patients' perspective. No instrument was comprehensive to all issues important to patients. The EORTC-QLQ-C30 and MY24 have undergone the most comprehensive psychometric validation. Most validation occurred in trial patients and not clinically representative groups. No studies evaluated clinical utility of tools alongside routine practice. Conclusion The best existing HRQOL tools are designed predominantly for use in research. Reliable, valid and responsive tools exist for this purpose, but may miss issues important to patients. The design of HRQOL measures should be guided by intended utility, whether for research or clinical practice, and further validation of HRQOL tools in clinically representative groups is needed. Development and validation of HRQOL tools for clinical use may be of value.

SummaryThe response of the tumour microenvironment to anti-cancer drugs caninfluence treatment efficacy. Current drug-screening methodologies fail todistinguish and quantify simultaneously the concomitant effect of drugs onthe tumour stroma and cancer cells. To overcome this limitation we havedeveloped a fluorescence-based experimental model that employs mCherry-labelled stromal cells (e.g. bone marrow fibroblastic stromal cells) co-cultured in direct contact with enhanced green fluorescent protein-labelledtumour cell lines for accurate assessment of proliferation and viability inboth cell compartments and adhesion of tumour cells. Additionally, we usedfluorescence-based image analysis to determine morphological changes thatcorrelate with cell function (e.g. morphology of the actin cytoskeleton andnuclearity of osteoclasts to predict their bone resorption activity). Using thisplatform we have revealed that dexamethasone induces HS5 fibroblast prolif-eration and contact with multiple myeloma cells via a process involving Src/c-Abl kinases. Osteoclasts also inhibited dexamethasone-induced apoptosisin myeloma cells while retaining their normal morphology and functionalityin bone resorption. Myeloma resistance to dexamethasone mediated by HS5cells and osteoclasts was reversed by treatment with the Src/c-Abl inhibitordasatinib but not with bortezomib. This new experimental platform providesa more precise screening of new therapeutics for improved efficacy oftumour cell killing within the bone marrow microenvironment.Keywords: myeloma, tumour microenvironment, co-culture system, dexa-methasone, drug-resistance.

To determine the cost effectiveness of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (LEN/DEX) versus DEX alone in managing multiple myeloma (MM) patients who have failed one prior therapy. An individual simulation model was designed to capture the costs and outcomes of LEN/DEX versus DEX therapy in relapsed refractory MM patients. MM009/010 efficacy data were adjusted for treatment cross-over and extrapolated to patient lifetime. Resource use for MM disease progression and adverse events were obtained from expert physicians and costed from the perspective of the National Health Service (England and UK) and included a patient access scheme for LEN. Utility values were obtained from published literature. The simulation model estimated an incremental improvement in time to progression of 9.5 months, an additional 3.2 life-years, and 2.2 quality adjusted life years (QALY) for LEN/DEX compared to DEX alone. Including the costs of therapy with the patient access scheme, adverse events, and disease follow-up, the incremental cost effectiveness ratio was £30,153/QALY for LEN/DEX compared to DEX alone in MM patients who have failed one prior therapy. LEN/DEX is a cost effective oncology therapy from the perspective of the NHS for MM patients with one prior treatment.

Background Reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic transplantation for myeloma is associated with lower non-relapse mortality and higher relapse rates in comparison with myeloablative conditioning transplants. Patients and Methods We have retrospectively audited 19 patients with myeloma or primary plasma cell leukemia who received allogeneic transplantation with a uniform alemtuzumab-based reduced-intensity conditioning protocol. These patients had not been treated with bortezomib or lenalidomide before transplantation. Results The treatment-related mortality at 1 year was (4/19) 21% with low incidence of graft-versus-host disease (6%) and 2-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates of 35% and 42%, respectively. Conclusion Progression-free survival in this cohort of patients is comparable to previously published data of reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic transplantation in myeloma. However, there is no plateau observed on the survival curves with a significant transplant-related mortality of 21%. Therefore, alemtuzumab-based allogeneic transplantation cannot be recommended as standard practice outside of clinical trials for treatment of myeloma.

Bone marrow or stem cell transplantation is an established therapy for haematological malignancies. We report a cytomegalovirus (CMV) IgG +ve 56-year-old patient who underwent autologous rescue with CD34(+) selected peripheral blood stem cells as part of consolidation therapy for multiple myeloma and subsequently developed CMV colitis. In contrast to infection secondary to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), CMV colitis has not previously been described in this context. We discuss this case and issues arising from it related to the use of CD34+ selected stem cells for transplantation.

Pomalidomide is a distinct immunomodulatory agent with significant activity in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). The optimal treatment schedule in patients with RRMM who have received multiple lines of treatment, including bortezomib and lenalidomide, is 4 mg/day on days 1–21 of a 28-day cycle in combination with weekly low-dose dexamethasone. Improved responses and outcomes relative to traditional therapies continue to be confirmed in recently completed and ongoing trials. Pomalidomide exhibits direct tumoricidal, immunomodulatory, anti-angiogenic and anti-inflammatory activities, which facilitate combination therapy with agents with complementary mechanisms of action, resulting in greater anti-myeloma effects than single-agent therapy or previous combination therapies. For example, in combination with proteasome inhibitors and traditional chemotherapeutic agents in doublet or triplet regimens, pomalidomide provides high rates of durable response, and represents an important new treatment option for patients with RRMM requiring effective new therapies. Additionally, pomalidomide maintains its efficacy and tolerability profile in difficult-to-treat patients, including the elderly, patients with poor cytogenetics and those with renal impairment. This review summarises the clinical development of pomalidomide and discusses this effective agent for the treatment of patients with RRMM in the context of current myeloma treatment options, as well as potential future directions to further improve patient outcomes.

Introduction: The role of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) as first line treatment for newly diagnosed patients with myeloma is currently under evaluation given the high response rates to novel induction treatment. The outcomes for patients that do not proceed to ASCT following induction remain unclear and are likely to be determined by genetic risk and response to therapy. In order to evaluate this further, this single arm phase 2 clinical trial conducted at 13 sites in the UK was designed to determine the 2 year progression free survival for patients that achieved ≥ very good partial response (VGPR) following induction therapy without ASCT. Those achieving partial response (PR) were consolidated with ASCT according to routine practice. In this first analysis we report secondary endpoints: disease response and regimen-related toxicity in patients completing induction, including minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity by multiparameter flow cytometry. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed myeloma eligible for ASCT received PAD (bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 days 1, 4, 8, 11; doxorubicin 9mg/m2 days 1-4 and dexamethasone 40mg days 1-4 (and days 8-11 and 15-18 for the first cycle only)) for up to 6 cycles (minimum of 4). Bortezomib was initially given intravenously (IV), but once approved this was switched to sub-cutaneous (SC). Those failing to achieve PR were offered salvage therapy off protocol. All others had peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilisation using cyclophosphamide + GCSF, followed by MRD assessment on bone marrow aspirates using multi-parameter flow cytometry. Depending on disease response, patients were then stratified to ASCT (PR) or no further treatment (≥VGPR). Responses were assessed using International uniform response criteria (Durie 2006) by intent-to-treat and toxicity scored according to CTCAE version 4.0. High risk disease was defined by the presence of one or more adverse FISH lesions (t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), del(17p13), +1q21) as described in the MRC Myeloma IX trial. Results: Between March 2011 and January 2014, 153 patients were enrolled (median age of 55, range 28-71 years). 139 (91%) received between 4-6 cycles of PAD. The majority (135, 88%) received SC only bortezomib and 18 (12%) received at least 1 cycle IV. The overall response rate to PAD was 81% with 46% achieving ≥VGPR (sCR: 6 (4%), CR: 13 (8%), VGPR: 51 (33%), PR: 54 (35%)). FISH data was available for 122 patients, 91 (75%) patients were standard risk and 31 (25%) were adverse. Responses were similar irrespective of ISS or genetic risk (standard, ≥VGPR 44%, PR 34%; adverse, ≥VGPR 55%, PR 29%). MRD results are currently available in 70 of the 124 patients achieving PR post PBSC harvest. Of this group 41 achieved ≥VGPR post-harvest (22 MRD+ and 19 MRD-) and hence did not proceed to ASCT, 13 patients achieved CR of which 8 were MRD negative. Toxicity was as expected for PAD and predominantly haematological. Notably the incidence of neuropathy was lower than that previously reported with IV bortezomib. Grade 3-4 events were: neutropenia: 18%; thrombocytopenia 7%. Grade 2-4 peripheral neuropathy was reported in 27% compared to 40% in the HOVON-65/ GMMG-HD4 Trial using IV bortezomib. Grade 1-2 neuropathy was similar for patients who received IV (55.6%) or SC (60%) bortezomib; however only 7% of patients receiving SC bortezomib developed grade 3 neuropathy compared to 28% with the IV route. Conclusions: SC PAD is a highly effective induction regimen for patients with newly diagnosed myeloma achieving a ≥VGPR of 46%. Of the 41 patients achieving ≥VGPR post-harvest with MRD result available, 46% were MRD negative. Response rates were similar across ISS and with adverse FISH. The use of SC bortezomib improved tolerability and substantially reduced neurotoxicity. ISRCTN no: 03381785. Disclosures Popat: Janssen: Honoraria. Cavenagh:Janssen: Honoraria. Schey:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Cook:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Cook:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Yong:Janssen: Honoraria.

PurposeTo assess the safety, efficacy, and immunomodulatory effects of CC-4047 (Actimid; Celgene, San Diego, CA) in patients with relapsed or refractory myeloma.Patients and MethodsTwenty-four relapsed or refractory patients were treated with a dose-escalating regimen of oral CC-4047. Clinical responses and adverse effects were identified, and peripheral T-cell subsets, serum cytokines, and proangiogenic factors were evaluated.ResultsCC-4047 was tolerated with no serious nonhematologic adverse events. All patients were eligible for analysis. Toxicity criteria during the initial 4 weeks of study were used to define the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD). During this period, one patient withdrew with a deep vein thrombosis (DVT) probably caused by an undiagnosed primary melanoma with lymphadenopathy in the groin, one patient withdrew because of progressive disease (PD), and three patients discontinued with neutropenia. Nineteen of 24 patients continued on treatment beyond 4 weeks to PD or development of a serious adverse event. Three further patients developed a DVT at 4, 9, and 11 months. Treatment resulted in a greater than 25% reduction in paraprotein in 67% of patients, 13 patients (54%) experienced a greater than 50% reduction in paraprotein, and four (17%) of 24 patients entered complete remission. The MTD was 2 mg/d. All patients showed increased CD45RO expression on CD4+and CD8+cells, with a concomitant decrease in CD45RA+cells. CC-4047 treatment was associated with significantly increased serum interleukin (IL)-2 receptor and IL-12 levels, which is consistent with activation of T cells and monocytes and macrophages.ConclusionThis study demonstrates the safety and efficacy of CC-4047. The MTD of CC-4047 orally was 2 mg/d. This is the first report demonstrating in vivo T-cell costimulation by this class of compound, supporting a potential role for CC-4047 as an immunostimulatory adjuvant treatment.