1. Optimizing interconception care: Rationale for the IMPLICIT model
- Author
-
Elizabeth Brown, Elizabeth Loomis, Michael A. Horst, David Holub, and Scott G. Hartman
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Tobacco use ,Maternal-Child Health Services ,Best practice ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Psychological intervention ,03 medical and health sciences ,Tobacco Use ,0302 clinical medicine ,Promotion (rank) ,Birth Intervals ,Folic Acid ,Pregnancy ,030225 pediatrics ,Medicine ,Humans ,Mass Screening ,Neural Tube Defects ,media_common ,030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine ,business.industry ,Depression ,Obstetrics and Gynecology ,Flexibility (personality) ,Service provider ,Infant, Low Birth Weight ,Health equity ,Low birth weight ,Family medicine ,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health ,Vitamin B Complex ,Premature Birth ,Female ,medicine.symptom ,Preconception Care ,business ,Risk Reduction Behavior - Abstract
Despite traditional prenatal interventions, the incidence of low birth weight and prematurity in the United States have not significantly decreased. Interconception care for women between pregnancies has been proposed as a method of improving various perinatal outcomes. Although broadly advocated by national groups, interconception care (ICC) has not been widely implemented. We describe best practices for an ICC model based on screening mothers for tobacco use, depression, folic acid intake, and inter-pregnancy interval at well child visits. Because of the model's flexibility, sites can readily customize implementation by incorporating the questions directly into existing workflows and using local service providers already working in maternal-child health. This model has demonstrated promising results and ease of implementation thus far, and offers great potential for improved perinatal outcomes and promotion of health equity.
- Published
- 2020