1. Outcomes after drug-coated balloon interventions for de novo coronary lesions in the patients on chronic hemodialysis
- Author
-
Satoru Oshima, Takuya Nakayama, Hideki Ishii, Takashi Sakakibara, Toyoaki Murohara, Motohiko Kakuno, and Ryuta Ito
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Hazard ratio ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Vascular surgery ,medicine.disease ,Gastroenterology ,Cardiac surgery ,Coronary artery disease ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Internal medicine ,Diabetes mellitus ,Angiography ,medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Hemodialysis ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Mace - Abstract
The impact of drug-coated balloon (DCB) on hemodialysis (HD) patients with coronary lesions remains unclear. This study aimed to compare outcomes after DCB treatment between HD and non-HD patients with de novo coronary lesions. A total of 235 consecutive patients who electively underwent DCB treatment for de novo coronary lesions were included (HD group: n = 100; non-HD group: n = 135). Angiographic follow-up was performed 6 months after the procedure. Patients were clinically followed up for 2 years. The incidence rates of target lesion revascularization (TLR) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were investigated. Diabetes and a history of coronary bypass grafting were more frequent in the HD group than in the non-HD group (69.0% vs. 50.7%, p = 0.007, and 24.0% vs 9.1%, p = 0.013, respectively). The reference diameter and pre-procedural diameter stenosis were greater in the HD group than in the non-HD group (2.49 mm vs. 2.24 mm, p = 0.007, and 65.9% vs. 59.6%, p = 0.015, respectively). Calcification was observed in 65.5% of all lesions, and rotational atherectomy was performed in 30.2% patients. The average diameter of the DCB was 2.51 mm (2.57 mm, HD group vs. 2.47 mm, non-HD group, p = 0.14). Although post-procedural diameter stenosis was similar between the groups, late lumen loss on follow-up angiography was larger in HD patients than in non-HD patients (0.27 mm vs. − 0.03 mm, p = 0.0009). The 2-year rates of freedom from TLR and MACE were lower in HD patients than in non-HD patients [79.3% vs. 91.7%, hazard ratio (HR) 2.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23–6.77, p = 0.014; and 61.6% vs. 89.4%, HR 4.60, 95% CI 2.30–10.2, p
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF