Search

Growing awareness of health and health care disparities highlights the importance of including information about race, ethnicity, and culture (REC) in health research. Reporting of REC factors in research publications, however, is notoriously imprecise and unsystematic. This article describes the development of a checklist to assess the comprehensiveness and the applicability of REC factor reporting in psychiatric research publications. The 16-item GAP-REACH checklist was developed through a rigorous process of expert consensus, empirical content analysis in a sample of publications (N = 1205), and interrater reliability (IRR) assessment (N = 30). The items assess each section in the conventional structure of a health research article. Data from the assessment may be considered on an item-by-item basis or as a total score ranging from 0% to 100%. The final checklist has excellent IRR (κ = 0.91). The GAP-REACH may be used by multiple research stakeholders to assess the scope of REC reporting in a research article.

Psychiatric beds in public hospitals have decreased 80% since 1955, but admissions have risen correspondingly, largely because of high recidivism rates. Decreases in numbers of beds have been partly achieved by shortening the length of stay, which lessened by half between 1970 and 1980. This study was undertaken to determine whether duration of hospital treatment affects the rate and rapidity of relapse among schizophrenic patients.Data on 1,500 patients from 10 state hospitals were gathered for 18 months after initial discharge. Predictor variables included age, sex, marital status, race, number of previous admissions, location of the facility, and length of stay. Data were analyzed by survival analysis with a Cox regression model for two times to initial relapse: 30 days and 18 months (outcome).Length of stay was significantly related to each time to relapse after the effects of number of previous admissions and age were partialed out. Facility location was not predictive, but intrahospital effects were tested by examining the data on the largest facility; again, length of stay significantly predicted relapse.Although the magnitude of the effect was small, the clinical significance of the findings is the greater likelihood that brief-stay patients will be rehospitalized within 30 days after discharge than will patients treated for longer periods. Brief hospitalization seems generally applicable to psychiatric populations, but there may be a small but important group of seriously mentally ill patients for whom other alternatives are possibly more appropriate and should be explored.

The VA health care system is the largest source of public mental health care in the country, providing specialty mental health care services to more than 550,000 veterans annually. This chapter reviews the nature and scope of VA psychiatric emergency services.

Objective The study examined whether length of hospital stay is related to recidivism among psychiatric patients. A quasi-experimental approach was used to address limitations of controlled and epidemiological research. Methods Three matched groups, each consisting of 55 inpatients with schizophrenia, were selected from public psychiatric units with different mean lengths of stay. Regression models were used to compare the groups on three variables: time to first readmission (survival analysis), number of readmissions (ordinal logit regression), and total time in the community in the postdischarge year (multiple linear regression). Results An analysis based on the units with different lengths of stay, which was similar to that typically used in controlled studies, found no differences in the three outcome measures. However, a second analysis that examined data for all patients irrespective of their unit assignment found that inpatients treated for 30 days or less relapsed sooner than those with stays longer than 30 days. The disparity in results was largely due to overlapping quasi-experimental conditions: many patients on the short-stay units had a long lengths of stay, and vice versa. The first analysis supports an administrative policy of short stays. The second reinforces previous findings that a group of patients, primarily young males with onset of illness at an early age and multiple previous hospitalizations, is at greater risk of relapse with short-term treatment. Conclusions The apparent contradiction between a unit- or patient-based analysis suggests that unit-based results should be interpreted with caution when used to make clinical or utilization review decisions.

Previous studies have shown that bone mass is significantly decreased in chronic alcoholic white patients, especially those with evidence of liver involvement. However, liver disease is an independent risk factor for bone loss. In vitro studies have shown that alcohol has a direct effect on osteoblasts. The effects of chronic alcohol consumption on bone mass in the absence of liver disease are not known. In addition, the effect of alcohol on bone in black alcoholic subjects has not been examined previously. In the present study, we evaluated the effects of prolonged heavy alcohol intake on bone mass in both black (n = 21) and white (n = 19) male subjects without significant liver disease. Bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine and hip and various markers of bone metabolism in alcoholic subjects were compared with those in respective age-matched controls (n = 16 blacks and 14 whites). Mean values for BMD of the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck were not significantly different between alcoholic subjects and their respective controls among either blacks or whites. In white subjects, age and duration of alcohol were noted to have significant independent effects on BMD, whereas in blacks, age was the only factor that significantly affected bone mass independently. In the absence of liver disease, prolonged heavy alcohol intake results in bone loss in white subjects. The skeleton of black subjects may be less affected by alcohol.

Homelessness among mental patients is frequently associated with deinstitutionalization. In a study to clarify the relationship between homelessness and psychiatric hospitalization, data from Illinois statistical reports and from admission reports of a state hospital that serves about 75 percent of the undomiciled mentally ill population in Chicago were analyzed. The rate of homelessness had increased substantially among psychiatric admissions over the last decade and was even higher among applicants for hospitalization. The homeless had lower admission rates than the domiciled, largely because of differing paths of referral. Nearly 20 percent of the homeless left the hospital against advice, and relatively few were referred to licensed long-term-care facilities. Until various systems develop adequate responses to the problem, both the numbers and the visibility of the homeless mentally ill are likely to increase.

In an exploration of residential instability and recidivism in chronic mental patients, 215 psychiatric admissions were followed for a year after the initial episode. In addition to an unusually high incidence of residential mobility, a relationship between mobility and number of hospitalizations was evident, as were isolation, disruptive family situations, and homelessness. The needed response of the mental health system is discussed.