Search

Left ventricular function is modified by respiration and pericardial constraint. The aim of this study was to compare left ventricular systolic and diastolic function during inspiration and expiration in four patient groups: patients (1) without cardiac disease, (2) with severe pulmonary disease, (3) with cardiac amyloid and (4) with pericardial constriction (before and after pericardiectomy). Using blood-pool left ventriculography with modified gating, we obtained time-activity curves at the onset of inspiration and expiration. On inspiration and expiration, patients with pericardial constriction and patients with cardiac amyloid were significantly different from those without cardiac disease and those with severe pulmonary disease, in that left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was less, peak filling rate was greater, time to peak filling rate was shorter, and rapid filling fraction was increased. When inspiration and expiration were compared, time to left ventricular peak filling rate was shorter (P = 0.05) on inspiration (118 +/- 48 ms) than on expiration (168 +/- 35 ms) in patients with pericardial constriction. No other measures differed between inspiration and expiration in pericardial constriction, and left ventricular function was unaffected by respiration in the other groups. Time to left ventricular peak filling rate was 49 +/- 69 ms less on inspiration than on expiration in pericardial constriction and this difference was significantly different (P = 0.04) from that in patients with cardiac amyloid (34 +/- 58 ms greater), patients without cardiac disease (2 +/- 69 ms greater) and patients with severe pulmonary disease (19 +/- 63 ms less). In pericardial constriction, pericardial resection caused an increase in LVEF without a change in left ventricular diastolic filling but abolished the differences present between inspiration and expiration in time to left ventricular peak filling rate. This respiratory response in time to left ventricular peak filling rate may be valuable in the diagnosis of pericardial constriction.

A survey of American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) members was conducted to determine their degree of involvement in the diagnosis and prevention of occupational and environmental respiratory disease (OERD). Although the response rate was relatively low, the results are likely to be representative. Calculations based on the data estimate that in the prior year, chest physicians on the average saw 15 patients with OERD caused by work, 13 worsened by work, and 28 affected by the home environment. Asthma appears to be a more common occupational or environmental concern than pulmonary fibrosis. Chest physicians clearly perceived a need for more education in OERD. The survey also demonstrated that although many chest physicians perform routine industrial surveillance testing, it is often done without using standardized methods. Furthermore, chest physicians are actively involved with medical/legal aspects of OERD. Overall, the survey documents the role of chest physicians in the area of OERD and emphasizes significant educational needs.

Previous studies of lung function in relation to smoking cessation have not adequately quantified the long-term benefit of smoking cessation, nor established the predictive value of characteristics such as airway hyperresponsiveness. In a prospective randomized clinical trial at 10 North American medical centers, we studied 3, 926 smokers with mild-to-moderate airway obstruction (3,818 with analyzable results; mean age at entry, 48.5 yr; 36% women) randomized to one of two smoking cessation groups or to a nonintervention group. We measured lung function annually for 5 yr. Participants who stopped smoking experienced an improvement in FEV(1) in the year after quitting (an average of 47 ml or 2%). The subsequent rate of decline in FEV(1) among sustained quitters was half the rate among continuing smokers, 31 +/- 48 versus 62 +/- 55 ml (mean +/- SD), comparable to that of never-smokers. Predictors of change in lung function included responsiveness to beta-agonist, baseline FEV(1), methacholine reactivity, age, sex, race, and baseline smoking rate. Respiratory symptoms were not predictive of changes in lung function. Smokers with airflow obstruction benefit from quitting despite previous heavy smoking, advanced age, poor baseline lung function, or airway hyperresponsiveness.

During running exercise above the lactate threshold (LT), it is unknown whether free fatty acid (FFA) mobilization can meet the energy demands for fatty acid oxidation. This study was performed to determine whether FFA availability is reduced during running exercise above compared with below the LT and to assess whether the level of endurance training influences FFA mobilization. Twelve marathon runners and 12 moderately trained runners ran at a workload that was either above or below their individual LT. Fatty acid oxidation (indirect calorimetry) and FFA release ([1–14C]palmitate) were measured at baseline, throughout exercise, and at recovery. The plasma FFA rate of appearance increased during exercise in both groups; running above or below the LT, but the total FFA availability for 30 min of exercise was greater (P < 0.01) in the below LT group (marathon, 23 +/- 2 mmol; moderate, 21 +/- 2 mmol) than in the above LT group (18 +/- 3 and 13 +/- 3 mmol, respectively). Total fatty acid oxidation (indirect calorimetry) greatly exceeded circulating FFA availability, regardless of training or exercise group (P < 0.01). No statistically significant exercise intensity or training differences in fatty acid oxidation were found (above LT: marathon, 71 +/- 12, moderate, 64 +/- 17 mmol/30 min; below LT: marathon 91 +/- 12, moderate, 60 +/- 5 mmol/30 min). In conclusion, during exercise above or below LT, circulating FFA cannot meet the oxidative needs and intramuscular triglyceride stores must be utilized. Further marathon training does not enhance effective adipose tissue lipolysis during exercise compared with moderate endurance training.

Objective. —To determine whether a program incorporating smoking intervention and use of an inhaled bronchodilator can slow the rate of decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) in smokers aged 35 to 60 years who have mild obstructive pulmonary disease. Design. —Randomized clinical trial. Participants randomized with equal probability to one of the following groups: (1) smoking intervention plus bronchodilator, (2) smoking intervention plus placebo, or (3) no intervention. Setting. —Ten clinical centers in the United States and Canada. Participants. —A total of 5887 male and female smokers, aged 35 to 60 years, with spirometric signs of early chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Interventions. —Smoking intervention: intensive 12-session smoking cessation program combining behavior modification and use of nicotine gum, with continuing 5-year maintenance program to minimize relapse. Bronchodilator: ipratropium bromide prescribed three times daily (two puffs per time) from a metered-dose inhaler. Main Outcome Measures. —Rate of change and cumulative change in FEV1over a 5-year period. Results. —Participants in the two smoking intervention groups showed significantly smaller declines in FEV1than did those in the control group. Most of this difference occurred during the first year following entry into the study and was attributable to smoking cessation, with those who achieved sustained smoking cessation experiencing the largest benefit. The small noncumulative benefit associated with use of the active bronchodilator vanished after the bronchodilator was discontinued at the end of the study. Conclusions. —An aggressive smoking intervention program significantly reduces the age-related decline in FEV1in middle-aged smokers with mild airways obstruction. Use of an inhaled anticholinergic bronchodilator results in a relatively small improvement in FEV1that appears to be reversed after the drug is discontinued. Use of the bronchodilator did not influence the long-term decline of FEV1. (JAMA. 1994;272:1497-1505)