1. Fetal weight estimation in tall women: is ultrasound more accurate than clinical assessment? A prospective trial
- Author
-
Ofer Markovitch, Tal Biron-Shental, Hanoch Schreiber, Ron Schonman, Maya Shavit, Yair Daykan, Omer Weitzner, and Yael Yagur
- Subjects
Estimation ,Fetus ,Percentile ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Pregnancy ,business.industry ,Obstetrics ,Birth weight ,Ultrasound ,Obstetrics and Gynecology ,Tall Stature ,General Medicine ,medicine.disease ,Medicine ,business ,Prospective cohort study - Abstract
Estimated fetal weight (EFW) is crucial for clinical decision-making during pregnancy and labor. Maternal habitus impacts its accuracy. This study compared the accuracy of clinical versus ultrasound EFW in tall pregnant women (height ≥ 172 cm, 90th percentile). In this prospective study, tall pregnant women at term, who arrived for a prenatal visit and delivered within a week, underwent clinical and ultrasound assessments of estimated fetal weight. Each woman served as her own control. After delivery, birth weight was compared to the clinical and ultrasound EFW. The primary outcome was the accuracy of each method in predicting the actual birth weight. All 100 women included in this trial underwent clinical and ultrasound estimations of fetal weight. Mean maternal height was 175.7 ± 3.3 (172–185) cm. More clinical EFW swere inaccurate compared to ultrasound (25 (25%) vs. 6 (6%), respectively, p
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF