1. The Effect of Financial Incentives on Quality Measures in the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus: a Randomized Controlled Trial
- Author
-
Thomas Rosemann, Oliver Senn, Corinne Chmiel, Fabio Valeri, Leander Muheim, Rahel Meier, University of Zurich, and Meier, Rahel
- Subjects
Male ,11035 Institute of General Practice ,medicine.medical_specialty ,media_common.quotation_subject ,610 Medicine & health ,Disease cluster ,01 natural sciences ,law.invention ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Randomized controlled trial ,Financial incentives ,law ,Diabetes mellitus ,Diabetes Mellitus ,Internal Medicine ,medicine ,Electronic Health Records ,Humans ,Quality (business) ,030212 general & internal medicine ,0101 mathematics ,Reimbursement, Incentive ,Aged ,Quality Indicators, Health Care ,media_common ,Chronic care ,Motivation ,business.industry ,Medical record ,010102 general mathematics ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Blood pressure ,2724 Internal Medicine ,Physical therapy ,Female ,business - Abstract
Background Financial incentives are often used to improve quality of care in chronic care patients. However, the evidence concerning the effect of financial incentives is still inconclusive. Objective To test the effect of financial incentives on quality measures (QMs) in the treatment of patients with diabetes mellitus in primary care. We incentivized a clinical QM and a process QM to test the effect of financial incentives on different types of QMs and to investigate the spill-over effect on non-incentivized QMs. Design/Participants Parallel cluster randomized controlled trial based on electronic medical records database involving Swiss general practitioners (GPs). Practices were randomly allocated. Intervention All participants received a bimonthly feedback report. The intervention group additionally received potential financial incentives on GP level depending on their performance. Main Measures Between-group differences in proportions of patients fulfilling incentivized QM (process QM of annual HbA1c measurement and clinical QM of blood pressure level below 140/95 mmHg) after 12 months. Key Results Seventy-one GPs (median age 52 years, 72% male) from 43 different practices and subsequently 3838 patients with diabetes mellitus (median age 70 years, 57% male) were included. Proportions of patients with annual HbA1c measurements remained unchanged (intervention group decreased from 79.0 to 78.3%, control group from 81.5 to 81.0%, OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.90–1.32, p = 0.39). Proportions of patients with blood pressure below 140/95 improved from 49.9 to 52.5% in the intervention group and decreased from 51.2 to 49.0% in the control group (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.99–1.36, p = 0.06). Proportions of non-incentivized process QMs increased significantly in the intervention group. Conclusion GP level financial incentives did not result in more frequent HbA1c measurements or in improved blood pressure control. Interestingly, we could confirm a spill-over effect on non-incentivized process QMs. Yet, the mechanism of spill-over effects of financial incentives is largely unclear. Trial Registration ISRCTN13305645
- Published
- 2022