1. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Radical Surgery versus Concurrent Chemo-Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis
- Author
-
Chiara Cassani, Stefano Bogliolo, Luciana Babilonti, Flavio Giannelli, Simone Ferrero, Barbara Gardella, Paolo Bruzzi, S. Mammoliti, Arsenio Spinillo, Alessandra Fazio, Mattia Maramai, Mario Valenzano Menada, Sergio Costantini, Fabio Barra, Pierangelo Marchiolè, and Paolo Sala
- Subjects
Oncology ,medicine.medical_specialty ,disease-free survival ,cervical cancer ,medicine.medical_treatment ,overall survival ,Locally advanced ,radical surgery ,Uterine Cervical Neoplasms ,Cancer ,chemo-radiotherapy ,locally advanced cervical cancer ,treatment choice ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Internal medicine ,Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ,Overall survival ,Retrospective analysis ,Medicine ,Humans ,Radical surgery ,Neoplasm Staging ,Retrospective Studies ,Cervical cancer ,Chemo-radiotherapy ,Chemotherapy ,business.industry ,Chemoradiotherapy ,medicine.disease ,Neoadjuvant Therapy ,Treatment Outcome ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,030211 gastroenterology & hepatology ,Surgery ,Female ,business - Abstract
This study aims to evaluate oncological outcomes in women affected by locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical surgery (NACT + RS) or concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT).This was a multicenter retrospective analysis of data related to women with LACC (FIGO stage IB2-IVA), who were treated by NACT + RS or CCRT between November 2006 and January 2018. The first endpoints were the evaluation of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS); univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for identifying the prognostic factors independently associated with these oncological outcomes.Overall, 106 women were included in the analysis; 55 of them (51.9%) underwent NACT + RS and 51 (48.1%) CCRT, respectively. Patients in the NACT + RS group had a significant better five-year DFS and five-year OS than those in the CCRT group (77.4% vs. 33.4%,This retrospective study demonstrated an improved survival outcome for patients undergoing NACT + RS compared with those undergoing CCRT. Our findings seem to support the use of NACT before RS as an effective alternative option to CCRT standard therapy.
- Published
- 2020