Diabetes is associated with substantially poorer cardiovascular outcomes. Furthermore, people with diabetes are at greatly increased risk of not responding to standard antiplatelet therapy for acute coronary syndromes, leading to higher mortality and stent thrombosis [1]. Poor glucose control likely contributes to these cardiovascular events through changes in platelet membrane fluidity and signalling, increased production of platelets leading to a greater fraction of younger and more reactive platelets not yet exposed to antiplatelet therapy, and increased triggering of platelet activation arising from an underlying thromboinflammatory milieu [2]. While patients with higher thrombotic risk may be prospectively identified through laboratory identification of elevated blood glucose or HbA1c [3], the approach to treatment for diabetic platelet hyper-responsiveness remains unclear. Options such as increasing frequency of antiplatelet therapy, additional and more aggressive antiplatelet therapy or more intensive glucose control have been suggested (Fig. 1). However, the data to support these are limited and, particularly where more aggressive antiplatelet therapy is proposed, must be measured against the potential for increased bleeding risk in patients with hyperglycemia. In patients with type-2 diabetes, Capodanno et al. [4] demonstrated enhanced inhibition of platelet function when patients took 81 mg of aspirin twice per day compared with 81 mg daily. Spectre et al. [5] showed greater inhibition of platelet function with 75 mg twice per day when compared to 75 mg daily in patients with type-2 diabetes and vascular complications. In a recent study Rocca et al. [6] showed that increasing frequency of dose better attenuated platelet activation over 24 h in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Therefore increasing the frequency of antiplatelet therapy dosing represents an appealing strategy in patients with diabetes and poor glycemic control. However, the clinical effectiveness of this approach on cardiovascular outcome, as well as the net benefit against increased bleeding risk remains to be investigated. Similarly, the addition of more aggressive antiplatelet therapy, such as newer ADP receptor antagonists with greater potency and bioavailability, or emerging thrombin receptor antagonists have been suggested [2]. The use of these must be weighed against the potentially increased risk of bleeding. While altering antiplatelet therapy strategies in patients with diabetes and poor glycemic control is an appealing avenue for further clinical investigation, a potential alternative or complimentary approach might be to achieve improved glycemic control in order to attenuate platelet activation. Several studies have assessed the ability of infused insulin in patients with diabetes to attenuate platelet function and improve cardiovascular outcome in acute coronary syndromes [7]. While evidence of improvement in cardiovascular outcome is variable, intensive treatment with insulin in patients with diabetes may attenuate platelet activation relative to conventional approaches to glycemic control [8]. In this issue of the Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, Vivas et al. [9] explore whether tight glycemic control with insulin infusion attenuates platelet reactivity in patients with an acute coronary syndrome and hyperglycemia at admission. In a post hoc analysis of the prospective, randomized, open-label CHIPs study, 67 patients with poor glycemic control (as measured by HbA1c [ 6.5 %) were M. D. Linden (&) Centre for Microscopy, Characterisation and Analysis, M510, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia e-mail: matthew.linden@uwa.edu.au