Search

Detection of somatic genetic drivers is important for risk stratification and treatment selection in pediatric leukemias; however, newly recognized genetic markers may not be detected by routine karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). To identify the combination of assays that provides the highest detection rate for clinically significant molecular abnormalities, we tested 160 B- lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) by karyotyping, FISH, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and the custom next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel, OncoKidsⓇ. In addition, we tested 40 myeloid malignancies with karyotyping, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), and OncoKidsⓇ; 36/40 myeloid malignancies were also tested with FISH. In B-ALL, individual testing methods had the following diagnostic yields for the key genetic drivers: karyotype 34%; basic FISH panel 45%; FISH panel with IGH and CRLF2 probes 65%; CMA 48%; OncoKidsⓇ 39%. CMA and OncoKidsⓇ testing allowed detection of key genetic drivers in 42% of the samples that remained unknown upon testing by conventional methods. In myeloid malignancies, OncoKidsⓇ had the highest yield for detection of both primary and secondary DNA mutations and RNA fusions. Our data highlights the complementarity between CMA and NGS and conventional cytogenetics/FISH in pediatric leukemia diagnostics. Due to rapid turn-around-time, FISH may be useful as an initial screening method in B-ALL. Our data also suggests NGS testing with a comprehensive panel, despite a longer turnaround time, is a good alternative to karyotyping and FISH in pediatric AML due to its superior detection rate.

DICER1 syndrome is a hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome caused by deleterious germline DICER1 mutations. Characteristic “hotspot” somatic mutations of DICER1 have been identified in DICER1-associated tumors. With the exception of genitourinary embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma and anaplastic sarcoma of the kidney, sarcomas are rarely reported in DICER1 syndrome. Herein, we report the clinical, histopathologic, and molecular findings of a germline DICER1-associated ovarian sarcoma in a 5-year-old female, a somatic DICER1-associated metastatic peritoneal sarcoma in a 16-year-old female, and a somatic DICER1-associated primary intracranial sarcoma in a 4-year-old male. A comprehensive review of the literature, including 83 DICER1-associated sarcomas, illustrates an unequivocal histologic pattern mimicking pleuropulmonary blastoma, regardless of the site of origin. The features include undifferentiated small round blue cells, poorly differentiated spindle cells, and large bizarre pleomorphic cells (anaplasia), often with rhabdomyoblastic and/or chondroid differentiation, and rare bone/osteoid formation. This unique heterogeneous histologic pattern should raise suspicion for pathogenic DICER1 mutation(s) warranting a detailed review of the family history and DICER1 mutation analysis. In addition to expanding the phenotypic spectrum of DICER1-associated conditions, identification of pathogenic DICER1 variants facilitates optimized genetic counseling, caregiver education and judicious imaging-based surveillance.

Background Recent large-scale genomic studies have revealed a spectrum of genetic variants associated with specific subtypes of central nervous system (CNS) tumors. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical utility of comprehensive genomic profiling of pediatric, adolescent and young adult (AYA) CNS tumors in a prospective setting, including detection of DNA sequence variants, gene fusions, copy number alterations (CNAs), and loss of heterozygosity. Methods OncoKids, a comprehensive DNA- and RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel, in conjunction with chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) was employed to detect diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic markers. NGS was performed on 222 specimens from 212 patients. Clinical CMA data were analyzed in parallel for 66% (146/222) of cases. Results NGS demonstrated clinically significant alterations in 66% (147/222) of cases. Diagnostic markers were identified in 62% (138/222) of cases. Prognostic information and targetable genomic alterations were identified in 22% (49/222) and 18% (41/222) of cases, respectively. Diagnostic or prognostic CNAs were revealed by CMA in 69% (101/146) of cases. Importantly, clinically significant CNAs were detected in 57% (34/60) of cases with noncontributory NGS results. Germline cancer predisposition testing was indicated for 27% (57/212) of patients. Follow-up germline testing was performed for 20 patients which confirmed a germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant in 9 cases: TP53 (2), NF1 (2), SMARCB1 (1), NF2 (1), MSH6 (1), PMS2 (1), and a patient with 47,XXY Klinefelter syndrome. Conclusions Our results demonstrate the significant clinical utility of integrating genomic profiling into routine clinical testing for pediatric and AYA patients with CNS tumors.

Introduction: The Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) Somatic Working Group (sWG) is a multi-institution team engaged in developing processes, resources, and standards to support accurate classification of somatic variants in cancer. Existing decision support resources in cancer knowledgebases are heavily skewed towards genes and variants relevant in adult cancers; however, information to support variant interpretation in childhood cancers is limited. Here we report on the goals and progress of the Pediatric Cancer Taskforce, created within the ClinGen sWG, to lead curation efforts of actionable alterations in childhood cancers. Methods: The ClinGen sWG Pediatric Cancer Taskforce (PCT) consists of a core group of twelve members comprising geneticists, pathologists, and oncologists with expertise in different pediatric cancers and with representation from 9 leading pediatric institutions. The taskforce has a total of 35 members including volunteer-curators who work under guidance of the expert members. Curation of childhood cancer variants is conducted in collaboration with the Clinical Interpretation of Variants in Cancer (CIViC) team at Washington University in Saint Louis, using the CIViC knowledgebase (civicdb.org) and the ClinVar database as open-access curation and data-sharing platforms. Diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic evidence is tiered according to the AMP/ASCO/CAP guidelines for the clinical interpretation of somatic variants. PCT members are assigned specific genetic variant-tumor type associations for curation, which are then reviewed in monthly conferences to finalize assertions in CIViC. Results: The PCT has prioritized 40 genetic alterations relevant to pediatric cancer for curation based on their clinical relevance and the lack of sufficient existing curated evidence in clinical knowledgebases. To date, 4 assertions have been created and added to the database: HEY1-NCOA2 fusion in mesenchymal chondrosarcoma, KIAA1549-BRAF fusion and ACVR1 p.G328V variant in pediatric glioma, and EBF1-PDGFRB fusion in pediatric B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Active curation has been initiated for NTRK fusions agnostic of tissue histology, targetable kinase fusions in Ph-like B-lymphoblastic leukemia, and common variants in selected pediatric sarcomas and brain tumors, focusing heavily on driver gene fusions in childhood cancers. 119 evidence items have been created in CIViC by the members. The PCT also works to implement more standardized and accurate classification of pediatric cancers in CIViC and other cancer resources, and to enhance search for pediatric-specific data through appropriate tagging of evidence using ontology terms. Conclusions: As molecular alterations are increasingly relevant to the care of children with cancer, the ClinGen PCT will work to develop standards, processes, and resources for efficient and accurate determination of clinical relevance of pediatric cancer variants. Citation Format: Alanna J. Church, Shruti Rao, Deborah Ritter, Arpad Danos, Kilann Krysiak, Laura B. Corson, Kevin E. Fisher, Matthew Hiemenz, Katherine A. Janeway, Jianling Ji, Chimene A. Kesserwan, Theodore W. Laetsch, Donald W. Parsons, Ryan J. Schmidt, Kristen L. Sund, Wan-Hsin Lin, Malachi Griffith, Obi L. Griffith, Shashikant Kulkarni, Subha Madhavan, Angshumoy Roy, Gordana Raca. Curation of pediatric cancer variants within the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on the Advances in Pediatric Cancer Research; 2019 Sep 17-20; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(14 Suppl):Abstract nr A58.

In the United States, recent judicial interpretation of interstate licensure laws has found pathologists guilty of malpractice and, more importantly, the criminal practice of medicine without a license. These judgments against pathologists highlight the need for a timely and comprehensive survey of licensure requirements and laws regulating the interstate practice of pathology. For all 50 states, each state medical practice act and state medical board website was reviewed. In addition, each medical board was directly contacted by electronic mail, telephone, or US registered mail for information regarding specific legislation or guidelines related to the interstate practice of pathology. On the basis of this information, states were grouped according to similarities in legislation and medical board regulations. This comprehensive survey has determined that states define the practice of pathology on the basis of the geographic location of the patient at the time of surgery or phlebotomy. The majority of states (n=32) and the District of Columbia allow for a physician with an out-of-state license to perform limited consultation to a physician with the specific state license. Several states (n=5) prohibit physicians from consultation without a license for the specific state. Overall, these results reveal the heterogeneity of licensure requirements between states. Pathologists who either practice in multiple states, send cases to out-of-state consultants, or serve as consultants themselves should familiarize themselves with the medical licensure laws of the states from which they receive or send cases.

Infiltrating astrocytomas and oligoastrocytomas of low to anaplastic grade (WHO grades II and III), in spite of being associated with a wide range of clinical outcomes, can be difficult to subclassify and grade by the current histopathologic criteria. Unlike oligodendrogliomas and anaplastic oligodendrogliomas that can be identified by the 1p/19q codeletion and the more malignant glioblastomas (WHO grade IV astrocytomas) that can be diagnosed solely based on objective features on routine hematoxylin and eosin sections, no such objective criteria exist for the subclassification of grade II–III astrocytomas and oligoastrocytomas (A+OA II–III). In this study, we evaluated the prognostic and predictive value of the stem cell marker nestin in adult A+OA II–III (n = 50) using immunohistochemistry and computer-assisted analysis on tissue microarrays. In addition, the correlation between nestin mRNA level and total survival was analyzed in the NCI Rembrandt database. The results showed that high nestin expression is a strong adverse prognostic factor for total survival (p = 0.0004). The strength of the correlation was comparable to but independent of the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 (IDH 1/2) mutation status. Histopathological grading and subclassification did not correlate significantly with outcome, although the interpretation of this finding is limited by the fact that grade III tumors were treated more aggressively than grade II tumors. These results suggest that nestin level and IDH 1/2 mutation status are strong prognostic features in A+OA II–III and possibly more helpful for treatment planning than routine histopathological variables such as oligodendroglial component (astrocytoma vs. oligoastrocytoma) and WHO grade (grade II vs. III).

Rearrangements of JAK2 are rare and have been described in various hematological neoplasms. We report a novel JAK2 rearrangement resulting from a t(9;22)(p24;q11.2) in a 14-year-old male with a diagnosis of B lymphoblastic leukemia. He was treated with Children's Oncology Group's protocol (AALL0232) but failed to achieve remission by day 29. He underwent a second induction and entered remission. His clinical course suggested that this JAK2 rearrangement might portend an unfavorable prognosis. This case brings the total number of JAK2 rearranged lymphoblastic leukemia cases in the literature to seven. The molecular genetic and clinicopathologic features of these cases were reviewed.