1. Minimising radiation exposure in catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias
- Author
-
Juš Kšela, Tine Prolič Kalinšek, David Žižek, Tadeja Kolar, Mehmet Yazici, Primož Trunk, Dimitrij Kuhelj, Martin Rauber, and Matevž Jan
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Time Factors ,Heart disease ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Operative Time ,Catheter ablation ,Radiation Dosage ,Radiography, Interventional ,Risk Assessment ,Radiation Protection ,Risk Factors ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system ,Fluoroscopy ,Major complication ,Zero-fluoroscopy ,Ultrasonography, Interventional ,Aged ,Angiology ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Research ,Radiation exposure ,Arrhythmias, Cardiac ,Middle Aged ,Protective Factors ,medicine.disease ,Cardiac surgery ,Treatment Outcome ,Echocardiography ,RC666-701 ,Mapping system ,Ventricular arrhythmia ,Cardiology ,Female ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business - Abstract
Background Conventional fluoroscopy guided catheter ablation (CA) is an established treatment option for ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). However, with the complex nature of most procedures, patients and staff bare an increased radiation exposure. Near-zero or zero-fluoroscopy CA is an alternative method which could substantially reduce or even eliminate the radiation dose. Our aim was to analyse procedural outcomes with fluoroscopy minimising approach for treatment of VAs in patients with structurally normal hearts (SNH) and structural heart disease (SHD). Methods Fifty-two (age 53.4 ± 17.8 years, 38 male, 14 female) consecutive patients who underwent CA of VAs in our institution between May 2018 and December 2019 were included. Procedures were performed primarily with the aid of the three-dimensional electro-anatomical mapping system and intra-cardiac echocardiography. Fluoroscopy was considered only in left ventricular (LV) summit mapping for coronary angiography and when epicardial approach was planned. Acute and long-term procedural outcomes were analysed. Results Sixty CA procedures were performed. Twenty-five patients had SHD-related VAs (Group 1) and 27 patients had SNH (Group 2). While Group 1 had significantly higher total procedural time (256.9 ± 71.7 vs 123.6 ± 42.2 min; p p = 0.20)] and recurrence rate after the first procedure [8/25, (32%) vs 8/27, (29.6%); p = 0.85] were similar in both groups. Fluoroscopy was used in 3 procedures in Group 1 where epicardial approach was needed and in 4 procedures in Group 2 where LV summit VAs were ablated. Overall procedure-related major complication rate was 5%. Conclusions Fluoroscopy minimising approach for CA of VAs is feasible and safe in patients with SHD and SNH. Fluoroscopy could not be completely abolished in VAs with epicardial and LV summit substrate location.
- Published
- 2021