Search

Background The CAVA trial did not show the anticipated risk reduction for postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) after thrombus removal via additional ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis (UACDT) in patients with acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (IFDVT). Difficulties in achieving an effective degree of recanalization through thrombolysis may have influenced outcomes. We therefore assessed whether successful UACDT (restored patency ≥ 90%) did reduce the development of PTS. Methods This CAVA trial post hoc analysis compared the proportion of PTS at 1-year follow-up between patients with successful UACDT and patients that received standard treatment only. In addition, clinical impact as well as determinants of successful thrombolysis were explored. Results UACDT was initiated in 77 (50.7%) patients and considered successful in 41 (53.2%, interrater agreement κ = 0.7, 95% confidence interval 0.47–0.83). PTS developed in 15/41 (36.6%) patients in the successful UACDT group versus 33/75 (44.0%) controls (p = 0.44). In this comparison, successful UACDT was associated with lower Venous Clinical Severity Score (3.50 ± 2.57 vs. 4.82 ± 2.74, p = 0.02) and higher EuroQOL-5D (EQ-5D) scores (40.2 ± 36.4 vs. 23.4 ± 34.4, p = 0.01). Compared with unsuccessful UACDT, successful UACDT was associated with a shorter symptom duration at inclusion (p = 0.05), and higher rates of performed adjunctive procedures (p Conclusion Successful UACDT was not associated with a reduced proportion of PTS 1 year after acute IFDVT compared with patients receiving standard treatment alone. There was, however, a significant reduction in symptom severity and improvement of generic quality of life according to the EQ-5D. Better patient selection and optimization of treatment protocols are needed to assess the full potential of UACDT for the prevention of PTS. Trial Registration Number ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00970619.

Background The CAVA (Ultrasound‐Accelerated Catheter‐Directed Thrombolysis Versus Anticoagulation for the Prevention of Post‐Thrombotic Syndrome) trial did not show a reduction of post‐thrombotic syndrome (PTS) after additional ultrasound‐accelerated catheter‐directed thrombolysis in patients with acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis at 1‐year follow‐up. This prespecified analysis of the CAVA trial aimed to determine the impact of additional thrombolysis on outcomes of PTS at long‐term follow‐up. Methods and Results Patients aged 18 to 85 years with a first‐time acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis were included and randomly assigned (1:1) to either standard treatment plus ultrasound‐accelerated catheter‐directed thrombolysis or standard treatment alone. The primary outcome was the proportion of PTS (Villalta score ≥5 on 2 occasions ≥3 months apart or venous ulceration) at the final follow‐up visit. Additionally, PTS according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) consensus definition was assessed to allow external comparability. Major bleedings were the main safety outcome. At a median follow‐up of 39.0 months (interquartile range, 23.3–63.8), 120 patients (79.8%) participated in the final follow‐up visit: 62 from the intervention group and 58 from the standard treatment group. PTS developed in 19 (30.6%) versus 26 (44.8%) patients, respectively (odds ratio [OR], 0.54; 95% CI, 0.26 to 1.15 [ P =0.11]), with an absolute difference between groups of −14.2% (95% CI, −32.0% to 4.8%). Using the ISTH consensus definition, a significant reduction in PTS was observed (29 [46.8%] versus 40 [69.0%]) (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.19–0.84 [ P =0.01]) with an absolute difference between groups of −22.2% (95% CI, −39.8% to −2.8%). No new major bleedings occurred following the 12‐month follow‐up. Conclusions The impact of additional ultrasound‐accelerated catheter‐directed thrombolysis on the prevention of PTS was found to increase with time. Although this study was limited by its sample size, the overall findings indicate a reduction of mild PTS without impact on quality of life. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT00970619.

Purpose We assessed the uptake of fertility preservation (FP), recovery of ovarian function (OFR) after chemotherapy, live birth after breast cancer, and breast cancer outcomes in women with early-stage breast cancer. Methods Women aged below 41 years and referred to our center for FP counseling between 2008 and 2015 were included. Data on patient and tumor characteristics, ovarian function, cryopreservation (embryo/oocyte) and transfer, live birth, and disease-free survival were collected. Kaplan–Meier analyses were performed for time-to-event analyses including competing risk analyses, and patients with versus without FP were compared using the logrank test. Results Of 118 counseled women with a median age of 31 years (range 19–40), 34 (29%) chose FP. Women who chose FP had less often children, more often a male partner and more often favorable tumor characteristics. The 5-year OFR rate was 92% for the total group of counseled patients. In total, 26 women gave birth. The 5-year live birth rate was 27% for the total group of counseled patients. Only three women applied for transfer of their cryopreserved embryo(s), in two combined with preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) because of BRCA1-mutation carrier ship. The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 91% versus 88%, for patients with versus without FP (P = 0.42). Conclusions Remarkably, most women achieved OFR, probably related to the young age at diagnosis. Most pregnancies occurred spontaneously, two of three women applied for embryo transfer because of the opportunity to apply for PGD.

Thus far, the association between residual vein occlusion and immediate compression therapy and postthrombotic syndrome is undetermined. Therefore, we investigated whether compression therapy immediately after diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis affects the occurrence of residual vein obstruction (RVO), and whether the presence of RVO is associated with postthrombotic syndrome and recurrent venous thromboembolism. In a prespecified substudy within the IDEAL (individualized duration of elastic compression therapy against long-term duration of therapy for prevention of postthrombotic syndrome) deep vein thrombosis (DVT) study, 592 adult patients from 10 academic and nonacademic centers across The Netherlands, with objectively confirmed proximal DVT of the leg, received no compression or acute compression within 24 hours of diagnosis of DVT with either multilayer bandaging or compression hosiery (pressure, 35 mm Hg). Presence of RVO and recurrent venous thromboembolism was confirmed with compression ultrasonography and incidence of postthrombotic syndromeas a Villalta score of at least 5 at 6 and 24 months. The average time from diagnosis until assessment of RVO was 5.3 (standard deviation, 1.9) months. A significantly lower percentage of patients who did receive compression therapy immediately after DVT had RVO (46.3% vs 66.7%; odds ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.80; P = .005). Postthrombotic syndrome was less prevalent in patients without RVO (46.0% vs 54.0%; odds ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.92; P = .013). Recurrent venous thrombosis showed no significant association with RVO. Immediate compression should therefore be offered to all patients with acute DVT of the leg, irrespective of severity of complaints. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01429714) and the Dutch Trial registry in November 2010 (NTR2597).

Background: Therapy with elastic compression stockings has been the cornerstone for prevention of post-thrombotic syndrome for decades in patients after acute deep venous thrombosis. It is uncertain who benefits most from therapy, and what the optimum duration of therapy should be. We therefore aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of individualised duration of compression therapy versus the standard duration of 24 months following an initial treatment period of 6 months. Methods: We did a multicentre, randomised, single-blind, allocation-concealed, non-inferiority trial at 12 hospitals in the Netherlands and two in Italy. We randomly assigned patients (1:1) with acute proximal deep vein thrombosis of the leg and without pre-existent venous insufficiency (Clinical Etiological Anatomical and Pathophysiological score

Background: Early thrombus removal might prevent post-thrombotic syndrome by preserving venous function and restoring flow. Previous trials comparing additional catheter-directed thrombolysis to standard treatment showed conflicting outcomes. We aimed to assess the benefit of additional ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis for the prevention of post-thrombotic syndrome compared with standard therapy in patients with iliofemoral deep-vein thrombosis. Methods: We did a multicentre, randomised, single-blind, allocation-concealed, parallel group, superiority trial in 15 hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients aged 18–85 years with a first-time acute iliofemoral deep-vein thrombosis and symptoms for no more than 14 days were randomly assigned (1:1) to either standard treatment with additional ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis or standard treatment alone. Randomisation was done with a web-based automatic programme and a random varying block size (2–12), stratified by age and centre. Standard treatment included anticoagulant therapy, compression therapy (knee-high elastic compression stockings; 30–40 mmHg), and early ambulation. Additional ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis was done with urokinase with a starting bolus of 250 000 international units (IU) in 10 mL NaCl followed by a continuous dose of 100 000 IU/h for a maximum of 96 h through the Ekos Endowave-system. Adjunctive percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, thrombosuction, or stenting was performed at the discretion of the physician who performed the intervention. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with post-thrombotic syndrome at 12 months diagnosed according to the original Villalta criteria—a Villalta-score of at least 5 on two consecutive occasions at least 3 months apart or the occurrence of venous ulceration—and was assessed in a modified intention-to-treat population of all randomly assigned patients who passed screening and started treatment. The safety analysis was assessed in the same modified intention-to-treat population. This study is complete and is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00970619. Findings: Between May 28, 2010, and Sept 18, 2017, 184 patients were randomly assigned to either additional ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis (n=91) or standard treatment alone (n=93). Exclusion because of screening failure or early withdrawal of informed consent resulted in 77 patients in the intervention group and 75 in the standard treatment group starting allocated treatment. Median follow-up was 12·0 months (IQR 6·0–12·0). 12-month post-thrombotic syndrome occurred in 22 (29%) patients allocated to additional treatment versus 26 (35%) patients receiving standard treatment alone (odds ratio 0·75 [95% CI 0·38 to 1·50]; p=0·42). Major bleeding occurred in four (5%) patients in the intervention group, with associated neuropraxia or the peroneal nerve in one patient, and no events in the standard treatment group. No serious adverse events occurred. None of the four deaths (one [1%] in the intervention group vs three [4%] in the standard treatment group) were treatment related. Interpretation: This study showed that additional ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis does not change the risk of post-thrombotic syndrome 1 year after acute iliofemoral deep-vein thrombosis compared with standard therapy alone. Although this trial is inconclusive, the outcome suggests the possibility of a moderate beneficial effect with additional ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis. Further research is therefore warranted to better understand this outcome in the context of previous trials, preferably by combining the available evidence in an individual patient data meta-analysis. Funding: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw), Maastricht University Medical Centre, BTG-Interventional Medicine.

SummaryElevated levels of factor VIII:c (elevated FVIII:c) are associated with an increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and arterial vascular events, and are at least in part determined genetically. We prospectively followed 192 asymptomatic individuals with elevated FVIII:c (>150%) and 340 with normal levels for an average duration of 31 months (range 7 to 56 months) to investigate the risk of VTE and arterial vascular events. Participants were first degree relatives of consecutive patients with elevated FVIII:c and VTE or arterial vascular events before the age of 50 years. The incidences ofVTE were 1.25% (0.46–2.73) per year in the subjects with elevated FVIII:c, versus 0.23% (0.03–0.82) in those with normal levels (OR 5.5 [1.1–27.3]). The annual incidences of arterial vascular events were 1.04% (0.34–2.42) and 0.23% (0.03–0.82) in relatives with and without elevated levels of FVIII:c, respectively (OR: 4.5 [0.9–23.5]). After adjustment for age, smoking, known diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension, the odds ratio for any event was 3.7 (1.1–13.1). In conclusion, asymptomatic individuals with elevated FVIII:c levels and a positive family history of VTE or arterial vascular events before the age of 50 appear to have a high annual incidence of first VTE and arterial vascular events. Elevated FVIII:c may be a common risk factor for both clinical entities.

SummaryAs homocysteine-lowering treatment has not reduced the risk of recurrent thrombosis in recent clinical trials, we hypothesized that mild hyperhomocysteinaemia is an epiphenomenon or associated with a low absolute risk of thrombosis. In this retrospective study, we enrolled 478 evaluable first-degree relatives of consecutive patients with venous thrombosis or premature atherosclerosis, and hyperhomocysteinemia. Absolute risks of thrombosis and effects of concomitant thrombophilic defects were compared. Relative risks were adjusted for clustering in families, age, sex, and atherosclerotic risk factors, where appropriate. Annual incidence of venous thrombosis was 0.16% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.08–0.30) in hyperhomocysteinemic relatives versus 0.11% (CI, 0.05–0.20) in normohomocysteinemic relatives; adjusted relative risk 1.6 (CI, 0.6–4.5). Annual incidences of arterial thrombosis were 0.34% (CI, 0.21–0.52) and 0.24% (CI, 0.15–0.37) in hyperhomocysteinemic and normohomocysteinemic relatives, respectively; adjusted relative risk 1.5 (CI, 0.6–3.5). Concomitance of multiple thrombophilic risk factors increased the risk of venous thrombosis in hyperhomocysteinemic relatives 20 fold, but a comparable effect was demonstrated in normohomocysteinemic relatives. We conclude that hyperhomocysteinaemia is associated with a low absolute risk of venous and arterial thrombosis. Concomitant thrombophilic defects are probably main determinants on the risk of venous thrombosis, rather than hyperhomocysteinaemia itself.

SummaryAcquired and hereditary thrombophilias are associated with obstetric complications such as (pre-)eclampsia, HELLP syndrome and fetal loss. Our objective was to assess the risk of obstetric complications in women with elevated levels of FVIII:C or hyperhomocysteinemia, as compared with their relatives who had normal FVIII:C or homocysteine levels. From a large family study of patients with venous thromboembolism or premature atherosclerosis and elevated levels of FVIII:C or hyperhomocysteinemia (propositi), the obstetric histories of female first degree relatives, who had been pregnant at least once, were studied. Levels of FVIII:C and homocysteine (both fasting and post-methionine loading) were determined. The number of obstetric complications was calculated and compared in women with normal and elevated levels of FVIII:C, and normal and elevated levels of homocysteine. Women with elevated levels of FVIII:C had a 15.4% risk for toxicosis, preeclampsia, or HELLP syndrome and a 23.9% for fetal loss. This was not statistically different from women with normal levels of FVIII:C. Women with hyperhomocysteinemia tended to have a lower risk for toxicosis, pre-eclampsia, or HELLP syndrome (8.0%, RR 0.6, 95% CI 0.2-1.7) and fetal loss (22.0%, RR 0.8, 95% CI 0.5-1.5) as compared to relatives with normal levels, although these differences did not reach statistical significance. If the analysis was limited to comparing extremes, the results did not materially differ. Unselected women with elevated plasma levels of FVIII:C or hyperhomocysteinemia are not at increased risk for obstetric complications as compared to their relatives with normal levels.

The prothrombin 20210A mutation has been associated with an increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and arterial cardiovascular disease. The risks for asymptomatic carriers of this mutation have thus far been studied only in case-control and retrospective cohort studies. Here we present the results of the first prospective observational study in asymptomatic first-degree family members of patients with either VTE or premature atherosclerosis and the prothrombin 20210A mutation. We included 464 individuals (236 carriers) with a total follow-up duration of 1816 years (943 years for the carriers). The annual incidence of a first VTE was 0.37% (95% CI, 0.08-1.08) for carriers and 0.12% (95% CI, 0.00-0.69) for noncarriers (HR, 3.1; 95% CI, 0.3-29.6). The annual incidence of a first arterial cardiovascular event was 0.56% (95% CI, 0.18-1.31) for carriers and 0.73% (95% CI, 0.27-1.58) for noncarriers (adjusted HR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.2-2.5). We conclude that the absolute incidence of a first VTE or arterial cardiovascular event is low; therefore, the clinical implications of carriership of the prothrombin 20210A mutation are limited, and routinely testing all first-degree relatives of probands with this mutation does not appear to be justified.

Hyperhomocysteinemia is demonstrated as a risk factor for venous and arterial thrombosis. Experimental evidence suggests that its thrombogenic propensity results from endothelial dysfunction and injury followed by platelet and fibrin formation. However, lowering homocysteine concentrations with vitamin B6, B12 or folic acid has not resulted in a reduced risk of recurrent venous and arterial thrombosis in large prospective clinical trials. This suggests that hyperhomocysteinemia is a surrogate for another thrombophilic related specimen. As high factor VIII:C levels are associated with an increased risk of both venous and arterial thrombosis, and with endothelial injury, we hypothesize that hyperhomocysteinemia and factor VIII:C levels are closely related to each other. Therefore, we performed a study to assess the absolute risk of thrombosis in hyperhomocysteinemia and the effects of elevated factor VIII:C levels on this risk in a large cohort of families with hereditary (index) deficiencies of protein S, protein C or antithrombin. Hyperhomocysteinemia was defined as a fasting plasma homocysteine level above 18.5 μmol/l and factor VIII:C levels were elevated when higher than 150%. A total of 405 relatives were included. Median factor VIII:C levels in hyperhomocysteinemic relatives (n=26, 6%) were 169%, compared to 136% in normohomocysteinemic relatives (P=0.004) (Figure) and were more often elevated (65 vs. 38%, P=0.006). Other thrombophilic defects, including the index deficiencies, factor V Leiden and the prothrombin mutation were equally divided. Hyperhomocysteinemia was associated with an increased risk of venous and arterial thrombosis (relative risk’s 2.6 [1.3–4.8] and 3.7 [1.5–8.4)], respectively). Relatives with elevated factor VIII:C levels were also at risk; relative risk 2.3 (1.4–4.0) for venous thrombosis and 2.3 (1.0–5.1) for arterial thrombosis. After excluding all relatives with elevated factor VIII:C levels, relative risk for venous thrombosis and hyperhomocysteinemia dropped to 1.3 (0.2–9.8) and nil relatives had arterial thrombosis. These results suggest that hyperhomocysteinemia indeed is an epiphenomenon for elevated factor VIII:C levels and therefore homocysteine measurements can be omitted in risk assessment for venous and arterial thrombosis when factor VIII:C measurements are incorporated in thrombophilia screening. Figure Figure