1. Factors associated with the emergence of integrase resistance mutations in patients failing dual or triple integrase inhibitor-based regimens in a French national survey
- Author
-
Anne-Genevieve, Marcelin, Charlotte, Charpentier, Pantxika, Bellecave, Basma, Abdi, Marie-Laure, Chaix, Virginie, Ferre, Stephanie, Raymond, Djeneba, Fofana, Laurence, Bocket, Audrey, Mirand, Helene, Le Guillou-Guillemette, Brigitte, Montes, Corinne, Amiel, Coralie, Pallier, Samira, Fafi-Kremer, Anne, De Monte, Elodie, Alessandri-Gradt, Caroline, Scholtes, Anne, Maillard, Helene, Jeulin, Magali, Bouvier-Alias, Catherine, Roussel, Georges, Dos Santos, Anne, Signori-Schmuck, Julia, Dina, Sophie, Vallet, Karl, Stefic, Cathia, Soulié, Vincent, Calvez, Diane, Descamps, Philippe, Flandre, S, Marque Juillet, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (iPLESP), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Sorbonne Université (SU), AP-HP - Hôpital Bichat - Claude Bernard [Paris], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP), CHU Bordeaux [Bordeaux], Génomes, biologie cellulaire et thérapeutiques (GenCellDi (U944 / UMR7212)), Collège de France (CdF (institution))-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité), Centre hospitalier universitaire de Nantes (CHU Nantes), Pathogenèse virale du diabète de type 1 - ULR 3610 (Laboratoire de Virologie), Université de Lille-Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Lille] (CHRU Lille), CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers (CHU Angers), PRES Université Nantes Angers Le Mans (UNAM), CHU Montpellier, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Montpellier] (CHRU Montpellier), CHU Tenon [AP-HP], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Sorbonne Université (SU), Hôpital Paul Brousse, CHU Strasbourg, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice (CHU Nice), CHU Rouen, Normandie Université (NU), Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon (UNICANCER/CRCL), Centre Léon Bérard [Lyon]-Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Laboratoire de Virologie [Rennes] = Virology [Rennes], CHU Pontchaillou [Rennes], Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Nancy (CHRU Nancy), Service de bactériologie, virologie, hygiène [Mondor], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Hôpital Henri Mondor-Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne - Paris 12 (UPEC UP12), CHU Amiens-Picardie, CHU de la Martinique [Fort de France], Centre Hospitalier Universitaire [Grenoble] (CHU), Université de Caen Normandie (UNICAEN), Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest (CHRU Brest), Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Tours (CHRU Tours), Service de virologie et unité de surveillance biologique [Bordeaux], Gestionnaire, HAL Sorbonne Université 5, Sorbonne Université (SU)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Génomes, biologie cellulaire et thérapeutiques (GenCellDi (UMR_S_944)), Collège de France (CdF (institution))-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Paris (UP), Sorbonne Université (SU)-Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP), Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Tours (CHRU TOURS), and Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Oncology ,genotype ,Integrase inhibitor ,hiv ,HIV Infections ,gerstmann-straussler-scheinker ,HIV Integrase ,viral load result ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,0302 clinical medicine ,Genotype ,Pharmacology (medical) ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Univariate analysis ,biology ,3. Good health ,Integrase ,univariate analysis ,integrase inhibitors ,Infectious Diseases ,Tolerability ,Dolutegravir ,Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring ,medicine.drug ,Microbiology (medical) ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Pyridones ,030106 microbiology ,03 medical and health sciences ,Internal medicine ,Raltegravir Potassium ,Drug Resistance, Viral ,medicine ,Humans ,HIV Integrase Inhibitors ,plasma ,Pharmacology ,disease ,business.industry ,genetics raltegravir dolutegravir ,Raltegravir ,Regimen ,chemistry ,[SDV.SPEE] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie ,Mutation ,biology.protein ,HIV-1 ,[SDV.SPEE]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie ,hiv-1 integrase ,business - Abstract
Background Successful 2-drug regimens (2DRs) for HIV were made possible by the availability of drugs combining potency and tolerability with a high genetic barrier to resistance. How these deal with resistance development/re-emergence, compared with 3DRs, is thus of paramount importance. Materials and methods A national survey including patients who were either naive or experienced with any 2DR or 3DR but failing integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-containing regimens [two consecutive plasma viral load (VL) values >50 copies/mL] was conducted between 2014 and 2019. Genotypic resistance tests were interpreted with the v28 ANRS algorithm. Results Overall, 1104 patients failing any INSTI-containing regimen (2DRs, n = 207; 3DRs, n = 897) were analysed. Five hundred and seventy-seven (52.3%) patients were infected with a B subtype and 527 (47.3%) with non-B subtypes. Overall, 644 (58%) patients showed no known integrase resistance mutations at failure. In multivariate analysis, factors associated with the emergence of at least one integrase mutation were: high VL at failure (OR = 1.24 per 1 log10 copies/mL increase); non-B versus B subtype (OR = 1.75); low genotypic sensitivity score (GSS) (OR = 0.10 for GSS = 2 versus GSS = 0–0.5); and dolutegravir versus raltegravir (OR = 0.46). Although 3DRs versus 2DRs reached statistical significance in univariate analysis (OR = 0.59, P = 0.007), the variable is not retained in the final model. Conclusions This study is one of the largest studies characterizing integrase resistance in patients failing any INSTI-containing 2DR or 3DR in routine clinical care and reveals factors associated with emergence of integrase resistance that should be taken into consideration in clinical management. No difference was evidenced between patients receiving a 2DR or a 3DR.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF