1. Long-term outcome of low-cost glaucoma drainage device (Aurolab aqueous drainage implant) compared with Ahmed glaucoma valve
- Author
-
Faisal Thattaruthody, Surinder Singh Pandav, Abhinav Vats, Manpreet Kaur, Srishti Raj, Madhuri Akella, Natasha Gautam Seth, and Sushmita Kaushik
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Intraocular pressure ,Visual Acuity ,Glaucoma ,Glaucoma valve ,Prosthesis Implantation ,Tonometry, Ocular ,03 medical and health sciences ,Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Glaucoma Drainage Implants ,Intraocular Pressure ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,business.industry ,Outcome measures ,ANTIGLAUCOMA MEDICATIONS ,Middle Aged ,Glaucoma drainage device ,medicine.disease ,Sensory Systems ,Surgery ,Ophthalmology ,Treatment Outcome ,030221 ophthalmology & optometry ,Female ,030211 gastroenterology & hepatology ,Implant ,business ,Surgical interventions ,Follow-Up Studies - Abstract
PurposeTo compare the long-term outcome of Aurolab aqueous drainage device (AADI) and Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV).MethodRetrospective analysis of patients with refractory glaucoma who underwent AGV (AGV-FP7) and AADI (AADI Model 350) implantation. The outcome measures were intraocular pressure (IOP), requirement of antiglaucoma medications (AGMs) and re-surgery for IOP control. The postoperative complications were classified as early (≤3 months), intermediate (>3 months to ≤1 year) or late (>1 year).Results173 patients (189 eyes) underwent AGV implantation (AGV Group) while 201 patients (206 eyes) underwent AADI implantation (AADI group). The IOP in AADI group was significantly lower than AGV group at all time points till 2 years and comparable at 3 years. AADI group had significantly higher number of AGM in preoperative period and significantly lower number in postoperative period till 3 years compared with AGV group. AADI group had more hypotony-related complications but statistically insignificant (p = 0.07). The surgical interventions were significantly higher in AGV (n = 18) compared with AADI group (n = 5) in late postoperative period (p = 0.01). At 3 years, overall success was seen in 58.18% in AGV and 73.08% in AADI group (p = 0.15). Complete success was seen in 7.27% patients in AGV and 25.00% patients in AADI group (p = 0.02).ConclusionBoth AADI and AGV implant had comparable mean IOP at 3 years with lesser requirement of AGM in the AADI group. Both procedures appear to be safe with slight preponderance of hypotony-related complications in AADI group.
- Published
- 2019