1. Utility of P2Y12 Reactive Unit Assessment on Ticagrelor in Cerebral Aneurysms Treated with Intracranial Stenting and Flow Diversion: Cohort Study and Case Report From Two Neurovascular Centers
- Author
-
Christian O Bohan, Oded Goren, Christoph J. Griessenauer, Dante M. Grassi, Gregory M. Weiner, Shamsher S. Dalal, Philipp Hendrix, Civan Islak, Clemens M. Schirmer, and Mirja M. Wirtz
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Aspirin ,business.industry ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Stent ,Neurovascular bundle ,Clopidogrel ,medicine.disease ,Surgery ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,P2Y12 ,Aneurysm ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,medicine ,cardiovascular diseases ,Neurology (clinical) ,business ,Ticagrelor ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,medicine.drug ,Cohort study - Abstract
Background Dual antiplatelet therapy consisting of aspirin and clopidogrel is the standard of care for neurointerventional stenting and flow diversion. Platelet function testing has been increasingly performed to identify patients with a hypo- or hyper-response to clopidogrel. Ticagrelor has been a popular alternative antiplatelet agent for such patients. We assessed the role of platelet function testing in patients receiving ticagrelor and undergoing stenting or flow diversion. Methods The data from patients who had undergone stent-assisted coiling or Pipeline flow diversion of a cerebral aneurysm with ticagrelor therapy at any point during their treatment course from May 2017 to August 2019 at a single academic institution in the United States were retrospectively reviewed. Platelet function testing was used to determine the P2Y12 reactive units (PRUs), and the results were correlated with the procedural complications. Results A total of 28 patients with 29 aneurysms were treated while receiving ticagrelor. Of the 29 aneurysms, 16 (55.2%) were treated with flow diversion and 13 (44.8%) with stent-assisted coiling. Four thromboembolic complications (13.8%) and no hemorrhagic complications developed. Of the 8 patients with ≥1 PRU value >100, 4 (50%) had experienced a thromboembolic complication. The patients without a PRU value >100 did not experience any complications. Conclusion A risk of thromboembolic complications exists for patients receiving ticagrelor, which correlated with the PRUs in the present preliminary study. The findings from the present study suggest that the safe PRU range for patients receiving ticagrelor should be shifted to 0–100, which is lower than that of clopidogrel, thought to be 60–210. Further validation of the optimal PRU range for patients receiving ticagrelor is necessary.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF