1. Association of site of treatment with clinical outcomes following intravenous antimicrobial treatment of a pulmonary exacerbation
- Author
-
M. Skalland, Christopher H. Goss, Patrick A. Flume, Natalie E. West, Umer Khan, Sonya L. Heltshe, Donald R. VanDevanter, and Don B. Sanders
- Subjects
Adult ,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Randomization ,Cystic Fibrosis ,business.industry ,Antimicrobial ,medicine.disease ,Cystic fibrosis ,Article ,Anti-Bacterial Agents ,Clinical trial ,Respiratory symptom ,Anti-Infective Agents ,Internal medicine ,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health ,Propensity score matching ,Humans ,Medicine ,Administration, Intravenous ,business ,Lung ,Lung function ,Pulmonary exacerbation - Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the STOP2 (Standardized Treatment of Pulmonary Exacerbations-2) study, intravenous (IV) antimicrobial treatment duration for adults with cystic fibrosis (CF) experiencing pulmonary exacerbations (PEx) was determined based on initial treatment response. The impact of home vs hospital care remains an important clinical question in CF. Our hypothesis was that STOP2 participants treated at home would have less improvement in lung function compared to those treated in the hospital. METHODS: Treating clinicians determined PEx treatment location, which was a stratification factor for STOP2 randomization. Lung function, weight, and symptom recovery were evaluated by treatment location. Propensity scores and inverse probability treatment weighting were used to test for differences in clinical response by treatment location. RESULTS: In all, 33% of STOP2 participants received IV antimicrobials in the hospital only, 46% both in the hospital and at home, and 21% at home only. Mean (95% CI) ppFEV(1) improvement was significantly (p
- Published
- 2022