1. The use of patient specific polyetheretherketone implants for reconstruction of maxillofacial deformities
- Author
-
Tommy Wilkman, S. Järvinen, Patricia Stoor, A. Kiukkonen, Junnu Leikola, Juho Suojanen, E. Kormi, Clinicum, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, University of Helsinki, HUS Head and Neck Center, Plastiikkakirurgian yksikkö, Päijät-Häme Welfare Consortium, HYKS erva, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, HUS Musculoskeletal and Plastic Surgery, and Suu- ja leukakirurgian yksikkö
- Subjects
Reconstructive surgery ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Polymers ,Dentistry ,Biocompatible Materials ,Polyethylene Glycols ,Benzophenones ,03 medical and health sciences ,Patient-specific implant ,0302 clinical medicine ,PEEK ,Prostheses and implants ,Deformity ,medicine ,Peek ,Humans ,Custom implant ,Retrospective Studies ,Fixation (histology) ,Patient-specific modeling ,business.industry ,Wound dehiscence ,Retrospective cohort study ,030206 dentistry ,DEFECTS ,Ketones ,Plastic Surgery Procedures ,medicine.disease ,3126 Surgery, anesthesiology, intensive care, radiology ,3. Good health ,Otorhinolaryngology ,SURGICAL SITE ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Coronal plane ,Computer-Aided Design ,Surgery ,Implant ,Oral Surgery ,medicine.symptom ,business - Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as a patient-specific implant (PSI) material in maxillofacial reconstructive surgery. Materials and methods: The retrospective study included a cohort of 24 patients who underwent maxillofacial surgery using PEEK PSIs. Each patient underwent preoperative multislice computed tomography (CT) with 0 degrees tilt of gantry. Based on the CT scan, the PEEK PSIs were planned and manufactured using three-dimensional (3D) modeling and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) techniques. All procedures were performed under general anesthesia. Implants were placed intraorally, extraorally or through subciliary, transconjuctival or coronal incisions. Results: In 22 of 24 cases, the PEEK PSI fit well without adjustments. Although the fit to the surrounding bone was perfect in almost all of the cases, the outer contour of the PSI was modified in nine cases before fixation. However, intraoperative implant modification did not affect the infection rate. In two cases, postoperative wound dehiscence and infection needed additional treatment and healed without removal of the implants. Conclusion: The follow-up data in this study showed good outcomes with reliable results for PSI made of PEEK in the maxillofacial region. (C) 2019 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
- Published
- 2019