Search

Background: Endoscopy within 24 hours of admission (early endoscopy) is a quality standard in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB). We aimed to audit time to endoscopy outcomes and identify factors affecting delayed endoscopy (>24h of admission). Methods: This prospective multicentre audit enrolled patients admitted with AUGIB who underwent inpatient endoscopy between Nov-Dec 2017. Analyses were performed to identify factors associated with delayed endoscopy, and to compare patient outcomes, including length of stay and mortality rates, between early and delayed endoscopy groups. Results: Across 348 patients from 20 centres, the median time to endoscopy was 21.2h (IQR 12.0- 35.7), comprising median admission to referral and referral to endoscopy times of 8.1h (IQR 3.7- 18.1) and 6.7h (IQR 3.0-23.1) respectively. Early endoscopy was achieved in 58.9%, although this varied by centre (range: 31.0% - 87.5%, p=0.002). On multivariable analysis, lower Glasgow-Blatchford score, delayed referral, admissions between 7am-7pm or via the Emergency Department were independent predictors of delayed endoscopy. Early endoscopy was associated with reduced length of stay (median difference 1d; p= 0.004), but not 30-day mortality (p=0.344). Conclusions: The majority of centres did not meet national standards for time to endoscopy. Strategic initiatives involving acute care services may be necessary to improve this outcome.

Background and study aims The standard radiofrequency ablation (RFA) protocol for Barrett’s esophagus (BE) encompasses an intermediary cleaning phase between two ablation sessions. A simplified protocol omitting the cleaning phase is less labor-intensive but equally effective in studies based on single ablation procedures. The aim of this study was to compare efficacy and safety of the standard and simplified RFA protocols for the whole treatment pathway for BE, including both circumferential and focal devices. Patients and methods We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on patients receiving RFA between January 2007 and August 2017 at two institutions. Outcomes assessed were: 1) complete remission of dysplasia (CR-D) and intestinal metaplasia (CR-IM) at 18 months; and 2) rate of esophageal strictures. Results One hundred forty-five patients were included of whom 73 patients received the standard and 72 patients received the simplified protocol. CR-D was achieved in 94.5 % and 95.8 % of patients receiving the standard and simplified protocol, respectively (P = 0.71). CR-IM was achieved in 84.9 % and 77.8 % of patients treated with the standard and simplified protocol, respectively (P = 0.27). Strictures were significantly more common among patients who received the simplified protocol (12.5 %) compared to the standard protocol (1.4 %; P = 0.008). The median number of esophageal dilations was one. Conclusion The simplified RFA protocol is as effective as the standard protocol in eradicating BE but carries a higher risk of strictures. This needs to be taken into account, particularly in patients with higher pretreatment risk of strictures, such as those with esophageal narrowing from previous endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR).

Gastric adenocarcinoma develops after stepwise progression from normal mucosa through to adenocarcinoma most commonly after being triggered by Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. As disease is often diagnosed late, the prognosis for gastric adenocarcinoma is poor. Identifying pre-malignant mucosal lesions such as atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia is one strategy adopted by clinicians to reduce cancer related mortality. Surveillance of high-risk individuals and endoscopic resection of dysplastic lesions is recommended by international and UK guidelines. The early detection and endoscopic management reduce the need for invasive surgery. The advancement of image enhanced endoscopy technology, endoscopic training, risk stratification and histological assessment has proven pivotal to the management of pre-malignant lesions. In this review we outline the development of a high-risk stomach, endoscopic assessment and review practical guidelines on identifying pre-malignant gastric mucosa.

BACKGROUND & AIMS Screening for oesophageal varices (OV) using conventional oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (C-OGD) is invasive and requires costly monitoring, recovery, and decontamination facilities. We aimed to evaluate the technical feasibility, acceptability and accuracy of a novel, portable and disposable office-based transnasal endoscope (EG Scan™ ) compared to C-OGD as the reference standard. METHODS This was a prospective cohort study. Consecutive adult patients with cirrhosis were invited to participate. All subjects underwent the two procedures on the same day performed by two endoscopists in a blinded design. Patients completed preference and validated tolerability (10-point visual analogue scale (VAS)) questionnaires on day 0 and day 14 post procedures. RESULTS Forty-five of 50 patients (90%) completed both interventions. Mean age was 59 years and OV prevalence was 49%. Patients reported higher preference (percentage) and better experience (mean VAS) with EG Scan compared to C-OGD on day 0 (76.5% vs. 23.5%, P < 0.001; 7.8 vs. 6.8, P = 0.058, respectively) and day 14 (77.8% vs. 22.2%, P < 0.001; 7.0 vs. 5.5, P = 0.0013 respectively). Sensitivity and specificity of the EG Scan for the diagnosis of any size OV were 0.82 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60-0.95), and 0.78 (95% CI 0.56-0.93) respectively. Corresponding values for the diagnosis of clinically significant (medium/large) OV were 0.92 (95% CI 0.62-1.0), 0.97 (95% CI 0.84-1.0) respectively. No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS EG Scan accuracy was higher for the diagnosis of medium/large OV compared to any size OV. Patients' preference and overall experience of the EG Scan was favourable compared to C-OGD 14 days after procedures.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Screening for Barrett's esophagus (BE) with conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy (C-EGD) is expensive. We assessed the performance of a clinic-based, single use transnasal capsule endoscope (EG Scan II) for the detection of BE, compared to C-EGD as the reference standard. METHODS: We performed a prospective multicenter cohort study of patients with and without BE recruited from 3 referral centers (1 in the United States and 2 in the United Kingdom). Of 200 consenting participants, 178 (89%) completed both procedures (11% failed EG Scan due to the inability to intubate the nasopharynx). The mean age of participants was 57.9 years and 67% were male. The prevalence of BE was 53%. All subjects underwent the 2 procedures on the same day, performed by blinded endoscopists. Patients completed preference and validated tolerability (10-point visual analogue scale [VAS]) questionnaires within 14 days of the procedures. RESULTS: A higher proportion of patients preferred the EG Scan (54.2%) vs the C-EGD (16.7%) (P < .001) and the EG Scan had a higher VAS score (7.2) vs the C-EGD (6.4) (P = .0004). No serious adverse events occurred. The EG Scan identified any length BE with a sensitivity value of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.83-0.96) and a specificity value of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.82-0.96). The EG Scan identified long segment BE with a sensitivity value of 0.95 and short segment BE with a sensitivity values of 0.87. CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective study, we found the EG Scan to be safe and to detect BE with higher than 90% sensitivity and specificity. A higher proportion of patients preferred the EG Scan to C-EGD. This device might be used as a clinic-based tool to screen populations at risk for BE. ISRCTN registry identifier: 70595405; ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT02066233.

Background and aim: Some studies suggest that narrow-band imaging (NBI) can be more accurate at diagnosing gastric intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia than white-light endoscopy (WLE) alone. We aimed to assess the real-time diagnostic validity of high resolution endoscopy with and without NBI in the diagnosis of gastric premalignant conditions and to derive a classification for endoscopic grading of gastric intestinal metaplasia (EGGIM). Methods: A multicenter prospective study (five centers: Portugal, Italy, Romania, UK, USA) was performed involving the systematic use of high resolution gastroscopes with image registry with and without NBI in a centralized informatics platform (available online). All users used the same NBI classification. Histologic result was considered the diagnostic gold standard. Results: A total of 238 patients and 1123 endoscopic biopsies were included. NBI globally increased diagnostic accuracy by 11 percentage points (NBI 94 % vs. WLE 83 %; P Conclusions: In a real-time scenario, NBI demonstrates a high concordance with gastric histology, superior to WLE. Diagnostic accuracy higher than 90 % suggests that routine use of NBI allows targeted instead of random biopsy samples. EGGIM also permits immediate grading of intestinal metaplasia without biopsies and merits further investigation.

Introduction IDA is prevalent in up to 5% of the developed world and endoscopy remains the most utilised investigation. Magnified white light endoscopy has been shown to accurately identify gastric atrophy, H. pylori gastritis and coeliac disease but the role of magnified NBI endoscopy (NBI-Z) in this context has not been evaluated. The study aim was to assess the ability of NBI-Z to make a real time diagnosis of these conditions compared to histology as the gold standard. Methods This prospective cohort study recruited patients undergoing endoscopic evaluation for IDA. All procedures were performed with an Olympus video endoscopy system by clinicians with advanced imaging experience. Systematic NBI-Z imaging in parts of the duodenum and gastric mucosa were taken with corresponding biopsies. A previously validated Nottingham Type 1–4 classification system was used to classify the characteristic gastric mucosal pit pattern, and magnified morphological features were used to describe intestinal metaplasia and villous atrophy. This allowed for a real time diagnosis to be made for villous atrophy, gastric atrophy and H. pylori gastritis. The specimens were examined by a single blinded GI pathologist. Results 105 patients were recruited over 3 years. Excluding those with an obvious cause (n = 11), a total of 94 patients were included in the final analysis. Female: male ratio was 1: 0.7, median age 66 years (range 21–85). 38% had significant co-morbidities. At time of endoscopy 52% were taking iron therapy, 19% aspirin, 30% PPI and 4% NSAIDs. The median (range) anaemia parameters were: Hb 10.8g/dL (7.7–12.6), MCV 82fl (60–97), Ferritin 10g/L (1–379) and iron 7.5 µmol/L (1–22). 73% had the procedure under sedation with median doses of 2.5 mg midazolam and 25 mg pethidine. Conclusion In patients with IDA, NBI-Z is highly specific in providing a real time diagnosis of gastric atrophy and coeliac disease. It is a useful technique to exclude H. pylori gastritis. The clinical relevance is that this technique allows for targeted biopsies, reducing the miss rate and thus increasing the diagnostic yield. Disclosure of Interest J. White: None Declared, S. Sami: None Declared, J. Ortiz Fernandez-Sordo: None Declared, J. Mannath: None Declared, K. Ragunath Grant/research support from: Olympus-Keymed UK, Speaker honoraria and consultancy fees from: Olympus-Keymed UK.

and 4) revealed that only age had a significant inverse association with a providers’ ability to calculate non-HDL-C (odds ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.24–0.85). Type of provider (physician vs nonphysician), specialists versus nonspecialist provider, academic versus non-academic practice setting, years since completing training, percentage of patients with dyslipidemia in a provider’s panel, and provider’s use of specialized lipid testing were not associated with providers’ ability to calculate non-HDL-C levels or knowledge regarding non-HDL-C treatment goals. Conclusions: Major gaps remain in providers’ awareness regarding non-HDL-C treatment goals and their ability to calculate non-HDL-C levels. These gaps are systemic and not restricted to specialists or non-specialists. Therefore, there is a need to implement system level interventions across specialties to address these gaps.