1. Giant Frontotemporal Cavernous Malformation in a 2-Month-Old Infant: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
- Author
-
John M Wilson, Olivia E Gilbert, and Jerome M Volk
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,medicine.medical_treatment ,General Medicine ,Cavernous malformations ,medicine.disease ,Lesion ,Edema ,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health ,Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain ,Medicine ,Surgery ,Neurology (clinical) ,Radiology ,Presentation (obstetrics) ,Differential diagnosis ,medicine.symptom ,business ,Pathological ,Craniotomy - Abstract
Introduction: Cavernous malformations in the pediatric population are exceedingly rare, especially in infants. Giant cavernous malformations (GCM) are even more rare and have a diameter >4 cm. The onset of symptoms predominantly occurs in adulthood, but the rate of hemorrhage is significantly higher in the pediatric population. Similar to non-GCM, GCM can be misidentified as tumors on imaging due to their tumefactive pattern with edema. Here, we present a rare case of a right frontotemporal GCM in a 2-month-old girl, the youngest recorded case in the existing literature. Case Presentation: A previously healthy 2-month-old girl presented to the emergency department following an increasing frequency of seizure-like activity that began 3 days prior to presentation. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain with and without contrast characterized a large (5.8 × 4.3 × 4.2 cm) heterogeneous lesion of the right temporal lobe with diffuse scattered blood products of various ages seen throughout the lesion. She underwent a right-sided craniotomy where a gross total excision was achieved. Pathology confirmed the diagnoses of a GCM. The patient’s seizures subsequently resolved, and she continues to do well postoperatively. Discussion/Conclusion: GCM can be mistaken for tumors due to their large size, cystic nature, and surrounding edema, but a vascular lesion should always remain in the differential diagnosis before operating, even in infants. Surgery is generally recommended in patients that present with a symptomatic hemorrhage, recurrent hemorrhages, persistent seizures despite medical management, or progressively worsening neurological deficits if the GCM is in a safe location. It has been shown that 70–99% of patients undergoing surgery with successful removal of the GCM can achieve seizure freedom 2 years postoperatively. Complete surgical excision of this infant’s GCM was successful in treating her neurologic symptoms; therefore, pathological confirmation of this lesion is critical and should prompt a complete surgical excision.
- Published
- 2021