Search

The DOAC Dipstick accurately detects the presence or absence of factor Xa (DXI) and thrombin inhibitor (DTI) classes of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients' urine samples on DOAC treatment. The aim of the study was to systematically review the literature and compare the performance of prototype and commercial test strips with a meta-analysis.A systematic literature search of electronic databases PubMed (MEDLINE) and Cochrane Library was performed. Heterogeneity between studies was calculated using the Chi-squared test and the I2 index. A random effects model was used to pool data to compare the performance of prototype and commercial test strips.Using PRISMA reporting guidelines, four of 1,081 publications were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis: three reporting on prototype (DXI n = 658, DTI n = 586) and one on commercial test strips (DXI n = 451, DTI n = 429). Sensitivity and specificity of DXI and DTI detection did not differ significantly between the prototype and commercial test strips. Odds ratios were 0.718 and 0.365 for sensitivity and 1.211 and 1.072 for specificity of DXI and DTI (p-values between 0.3334 and 1.000), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity values for DXI were 0.968 (p = 0.1290, I2 47.1%) and 0.979 (p = 0.1965, I2 35.9%), and for DTI 0.993 (p = 0.1870, I2 37.5%) and 0.993 (p = 0.7380, I2 0%), respectively.Prototype and commercial DOAC test strips did not differ in their ability to detect DXI and DTI in patient urine samples. This supports the confidence in use of the DOAC Dipstick test, although it needs to be validated in specific patient populations.

Novel mRNA and vector-based covid-19 vaccinations have shown high efficacy in preventing symptomatic COVID-19 infections. Compared with the number of performed vaccinations, rates of severe side effects seem low. Rare prothrombotic coagulation disorders with suspected association to ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca) have been reported. These cases have gathered considerable media attention and caused a temporary pause of usage of the AstraZeneca vaccine in Europe and several other countries and are currently discussed as vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT). However, hemorrhagic complications from ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination have also been reported but, so far, received less public attention despite considerable potential for life-threatening complications. Here we present a case of severe immune thrombocytopenia after ChAdOx1 covid-19 vaccination and its successful primary management.

Preventing thromboembolic events, while minimizing bleeding risks, remains challenging when managing patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Several factors contribute to current dosing patterns of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), including patient characteristics, comorbidities, and physician judgment. Application of NOAC doses inconsistent with the drug labels may cause patients to receive either subtherapeutic (increasing stroke risk) or supratherapeutic (increasing bleeding risk) anticoagulant levels. In clinical practice, under- or over-dosing of NOACs in patients with AF is not uncommon. This analysis of prospective and retrospective registry and database studies on NOAC use in patients with AF (with at least 250 patients in each treatment arm) showed that under-dosing may be associated with reduced effectiveness for stroke prevention, with similar or even increased bleeding than with the standard dose. This may reflect underlying conditions and patient factors that increase bleeding despite NOAC dose reduction. Such factors could drive the observed overuse of reduced NOAC dosages, often making the prescription of reduced-dose NOAC an intentional label deviation. In contrast, over-dosing more likely occurs accidentally; instead of providing benefits, it may be associated with worse safety outcomes than the standard dose, including increased bleeding risk and higher all-cause mortality rates. This review summarizes the main findings on NOAC doses usually prescribed to patients with AF in clinical practice.

Introduction Following successful phase-III trials, direct oral anticoagulants such as rivaroxaban have largely replaced warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (SPAF). However, data from randomized trials should be confirmed in unselected cohorts. Materials and methods Prospective registries can provide such data but often limit follow-up to short periods only. Extending our previously reported follow-up of 2.2 years in 1204 SPAF patients receiving rivaroxaban in the non-interventional DRESDEN NOAC REGISTRY, we now provide prospectively collected 5 years data (mean follow-up 5.5 ± 2.3 years) for this cohort. Results Between 1 October 2011 and 31 December 2019, the combined endpoint of stroke/transient ischemic attack/systemic embolism occurred at a rate of 2.3/100 patient-years in the intention-to-treat analysis (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9–2.7) and at 1.6/100 patient-years in the on-treatment analysis (events within 3 days after last drug intake). On-treatment rates for major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding were 3.1 and 19.6/100 patient-years, respectively. Rivaroxaban treatment discontinuation occurred in a total of 574 patients during follow-up (11.0/100 patient-years in Kaplan–Meier analysis) and 426 patient died (all-cause mortality 6.3/100 pt. years; mean time from enrolment 3.6 ± 2.1 years), of which the causes of death were reported as arterial or venous embolism for 32 patients (21 occurring after treatment discontinuation and 11 during active treatment) and as bleeding for 24 patients. Conclusions Our data provide reassuring long-term outcome data for an elderly, co-morbid SPAF population, especially with regard to the low rate of fatal thromboembolic and bleeding complications.

Summary Background Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have largely replaced vitamin K antagonists in many indications for anticoagulation. Prescribed to millions of patients, including women of reproductive age, exposure to DOACs in early pregnancy is not uncommon, but data on the embryotoxic risks are scarce. We aimed to assess the risk of DOAC embryotoxicity in a large sample of reported cases. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, we collected individual case reports of DOAC exposure in pregnancy from gynaecologists, haematologists, and vascular specialists starting from May, 2015. We obtained exports in April and October, 2017, August, 2018, and December, 2019, from the pharmacovigilance databases of the DOAC manufacturers, the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the German drug authority, and searched the homepage of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for pregnancy exposure reports. Data from the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) registry were obtained in August, 2018, and on July 21, 2020; data from the Teratology Information Service in Ulm, Germany, were received July 22, 2020. We also ran a systematic literature search on July 22, 2020, for cases of DOAC exposure. These data were compiled with those from our 2016 risk assessment and duplicate reports were excluded. Fetal or neonatal abnormalities were classified as a major birth defect according to the European Concerted Action on Congenital Anomalies and Twins (EUROCAT) classification and adjudicated into four categories: relation to DOAC exposure likely, possible, unlikely, or unrelated. Findings We identified 1193 reports of DOAC exposure during pregnancy: 49 from physicians, 48 from the ISTH registry, 29 from the Teratology Information Service, 62 from the German drug authority, 536 from Bayer (extracted from the Bayer pharmacovigilance system, the WHO VigiBase, and from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System), 87 from Boehringer Ingelheim, 16 from Daiichi Sankyo, 98 from the literature search, two from the FDA homepage search, ten from the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Review, and 256 from the EMA reports. After excluding potential duplicates, we identified 614 unique cases of DOAC exposure in pregnancy occurring between Feb 1, 2007, and July 9, 2020, that consisted of rivaroxaban in 505 (82%) pregnancies, dabigatran in 36 (6%), apixaban in 50 (8%), and edoxaban in 23 (4%). The median duration of DOAC exposure was 5·3 weeks (IQR 4·0–7·0) into pregnancy. Information on pregnancy outcome was available in 336 (55%) of 614 pregnancies: 188 (56%) livebirths, 74 (22%) miscarriages, and 74 (22%) elective pregnancy terminations. 21 (6%; 95% CI 4–9) of 336 showed fetal abnormalities, of which 12 (4%; 2–6) were adjudicated as major birth defects potentially related to DOAC exposure. Interpretation Although reports of pregnancy outcomes after DOAC exposure are missing important details and predominantly describe rivaroxaban exposures, the available data do not suggest that DOAC exposure in pregnancy carries a high risk of embryopathy. The 2016 ISTH guidance against elective pregnancy termination for fear of DOAC embryotoxicity and the recommendation in favour of close pregnancy surveillance is still valid. Pregnancy outcome data are inconsistently captured in pharmacovigilance databases, indicating a strong need for a more robust system of reporting. Funding None.

Was ist neu? Laborchemische Gerinnungsauffälligkeiten bei COVID-19 COVID-19-Patienten weisen häufig stark erhöhte D-Dimer-Werte auf. Die Höhe und der Verlauf scheinen mit dem Krankheitsverlauf und der Prognose zu korrelieren. Bei signifikanter Erhöhung sollte eine medikamentöse Thromboseprophylaxe erwogen werden. Der Verlauf der Prothrombinfragmente F1 + F2 scheint ebenfalls mit dem klinischen Verlauf zu korrelieren und könnte bei Verfügbarkeit zur Verlaufsbeurteilung der Gerinnungsaktivierung mit herangezogen werden. Thrombozytopenien bei COVID-19-Erkrankten sind häufig, sollten jedoch mittels weiterführender Diagnostik auf Differenzialdiagnosen geprüft werden. Risiko thromboembolischer Komplikationen bei COVID-19 COVID-19-Erkrankte haben ein deutlich erhöhtes Risiko für venöse und arterielle thromboembolische Ereignisse, und insbesondere intensivmedizinisch betreute Patienten bedürfen einer engmaschigen Kontrolle. Bestehende Algorithmen zur Diagnostik einer Lungenarterienembolie können wegen der sehr häufigen Konstellation „pulmonale Symptome + erhöhte D-Dimere“ bei COVID-19 nur eingeschränkt angewendet werden und bedürfen einer Anpassung an diese Erkrankung. Bei Lungenarterienembolien handelt es sich wahrscheinlich um lokal entstandene „Immunothrombosen“, was bei der Befundinterpretation einer pulmonalen Bildgebung zu beachten ist. Empfehlungen zur Thromboseprophylaxe bei COVID-19 Aufgrund des überdurchschnittlich hohen VTE-Risikos hospitalisierter COVID-19-Patienten sollte eine leitliniengerechte Thromboseprophylaxe unbedingt durchgeführt werden – bei Patienten mit besonders hohem Basisrisiko sollten höhere Heparindosierungen, posthospitale Verlängerungen und ggf. sogar primär ambulante Thromboseprophylaxestrategien erwogen werden. Eine bereits vor der COVID-19-Erkrankung etablierte Antikoagulationstherapie (bspw. für Vorhofflimmern oder frühere VTE) sollte fortgeführt werden.

A systematic literature review was conducted to identify and summarize the clinical efficacy and safety of available antithrombotic therapies after peripheral endovascular or surgical revascularization in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). Five databases were searched using free-text and Emtree/Mesh terms for PAD, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and antithrombotic therapies of interest (ie, single antiplatelet therapy, dual antiplatelet therapy, and vitamin K antagonists). Randomized controlled trials were eligible for inclusion if they assessed the risk of thrombotic events (ie, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, cardiovascular death, limb ischemia, or limb amputation) or safety profile (ie, minor, moderate, major, or fatal bleeding events) after revascularization. In total, 16 RCTs were identified. Only a few studies reported on treatment effects of the investigated therapies. Myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, cardiovascular death, and amputation were reported in up to 2.3%, 2.3%, 5.6%, and 7.3% of patients, respectively. Bleeding events were observed in up to 8.4% (major) and 1.5% (fatal) of patients. Despite available treatments, patients with PAD undergoing revascularization remain at risk of thrombotic events. There is a need for new treatments that will help to optimize care for patients with symptomatic PAD undergoing revascularization.

There is limited data evaluating clinical outcomes of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in obese patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in obese VTE patients. We performed a cohort analysis using Optum® De-Identified Electronic Health Record data from 11/1/2012 to 9/30/2018. Patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 admitted to the hospital, emergency department or observation unit for VTE, prescribed rivaroxaban or warfarin as their first oral anticoagulant (OAC) within 7-days and had ≥12-months of EHR activity prior were included. We excluded patients with OAC use at baseline or cancer. Patients were 1:1 matched (standard differences

Background and Purpose: It is unestablished whether andexanet alfa, compared with guideline-based usual care including prothrombin complex concentrates, is associated with reduced hematoma expansion (HE) and mortality in patients with factor-Xa inhibitor–related intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We compared the occurrence of HE and clinical outcomes in patients treated either with andexanet alfa or with usual care during the acute phase of factor-Xa inhibitor–related ICH. Methods: Data were extracted from the multicenter, prospective, single-arm ANNEXA-4 trial (Andexanet Alfa, a Novel Antidote to the Anticoagulation Effects of Factor Xa Inhibitors) and a multicenter observational cohort study, RETRACE-II (German-Wide Multicenter Analysis of Oral Anticoagulant-Associated Intracerebral Hemorrhage - Part Two). HE was based on computed tomography scans performed within 36 hours from baseline imaging. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was performed to adjust for baseline comorbidities and ICH severity. Patients presenting with atraumatic ICH while receiving apixaban or rivaroxaban within 18 hours of admission were included. Patients with secondary ICH or not fulfilling the inclusion criteria for the ANNEXA-4 trial were excluded. We compared ANNEXA-4 patients, who received andexanet alfa for hemostatic treatment, with RETRACE-II patients who were treated with usual care, primarily administration of prothrombin complex concentrates. Primary outcome was rate of HE defined as relative increase of ≥35%. Secondary outcomes comprised mean absolute change in hematoma volume, as well as in-hospital mortality and functional outcome. Results: Overall, 182 patients with factor-Xa inhibitor–related ICH (85 receiving andexanet alfa versus 97 receiving usual care) were selected for analysis. There were no relevant differences regarding demographic or clinical characteristics between both groups. HE occurred in 11 of 80 (14%) andexanet alfa patients compared with 21 of 67 (36%) usual care patients (adjusted relative risk, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.20–0.78]; P =0.005), with a reduction in mean overall hematoma volume change of 7 mL. There were no statistically significant differences among in-hospital mortality or functional outcomes. Sensitivity analysis including only usual care patients receiving prothrombin complex concentrates demonstrated consistent results. Conclusions: As compared with usual care, andexanet alfa was associated with a lower rate of HE in atraumatic factor-Xa inhibitor–related ICH, however, without translating into significantly improved clinical outcomes. A comparative trial is needed to confirm the benefit on limiting HE and to explore clinical outcomes across patient subgroups and by time to treatment. Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02329327 and NCT03093233.

Thrombosis and haemostasis 122(4), 552-559 (2022). doi:10.1055/a-1549-6556, Published by Thieme, Stuttgart

Occult cancer is detected in about 5% of patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the 12 months following VTE diagnosis. Current guidance suggests conducting a ‘limited’ cancer screening in these patients, consisting of medical history taking, physical examination, routine blood tests, chest X-ray, and age- and gender-specific testing, over full-body imaging. However, almost half of underlying cancers remain undetected with this approach. Blood-based liquid biopsies may provide an attractive addition or alternative to current cancer screening strategies, with a potentially higher detection rate while avoiding radiation or invasive testing. The PLATO-VTE study is an ongoing, investigator-initiated, multinational, prospective, observational cohort study comparing the sensitivity of novel biomarkers for detecting cancer with that of limited cancer screening in the setting of unprovoked VTE. Patients older than 40 years with a first episode of unprovoked VTE are eligible, while those with major and minor transient provoking risk factors for VTE are excluded. Patients undergo standard-of-care ‘limited’ cancer screening and are followed for 12 months for the occurrence of cancer. A blood sample for biomarker analysis is drawn within 10 days; a second sample is taken at 3 months to assess test result consistency over time. Three biomarkers are assessed: platelet mRNA, circulating tumor DNA, and plasma proteomics analysis. The sensitivity and predictive value of the biomarkers at baseline will be compared with those of limited screening. The results from the PLATO-VTE study may lead to reconsider current approaches for cancer screening in patients with unprovoked VTE.

Background: Patients with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) have a high risk of recurrent venous thromboembolic events, which contribute to significant morbidity and mortality. Direct oral anticoagulants may provide a convenient treatment option for these patients. Objectives: To assess clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with active cancer changing to rivaroxaban after ≥4weeks of standard therapy for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in clinical practice. This analysis focused on secondary outcomes of Cancer-associated thrOmboSIs – Patient-reported outcoMes with rivarOxaban (COSIMO). Patients: COSIMO was a multinational, prospective, noninterventional, single-arm cohort study. Overall, 505 patients received at least one dose of rivaroxaban; 96.6% changing from low-molecular-weight heparin, 1.6% from a vitamin K antagonist, and 1.8% from fondaparinux. Results: Most patients had solid tumors (n=449; 88.9%) and approximately half of these patients had metastases. The qualifying venous thromboembolic event was deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in 45.3% of patients, pulmonary embolism (PE) in 37.2% of patients, DVT with PE in 9.7% of patients, and catheter-associated DVT in 7.5% of patients. Approximately 75.1% of patients received rivaroxaban for at least 3months; 150 (29.7%) patients received concomitant chemotherapy during the study. VTE recurrence, major bleeding, nonmajor bleeding, and major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in 18 (3.6%), 18 (3.6%), 81 (16.0%), and 12 (2.4%) patients, respectively. Conclusions: In patients with CAT who changed to rivaroxaban treatment after ≥4weeks of standard therapy, the observed incidence proportions of recurrent VTE and bleeding events were in keeping with the recognized effectiveness and safety profile of rivaroxaban for the treatment of CAT.

Kardiologia polska = Polish heart journal 79(11), 1265-1267 (2021). doi:10.33963/KP.a2021.0134, Published by Termedia Wydawn, Poznań

Introduction Non-vitamin-K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were recommended in preference to oral vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in the 2020 updated guidelines for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF), from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Rivaroxaban is a NOAC that is approved in many countries worldwide for reducing the risk of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Purpose To explore the baseline characteristics, dosing and 2-year outcomes of patients with AF treated with rivaroxaban. Methods RIVaroxaban Evaluation in Real Life setting (RIVER) is a prospective international, multicenter registry of patients with newly diagnosed non-valvular AF treated with rivaroxaban for the prevention of thromboembolic stroke and at least one investigator-determined risk factor for stroke. Results A total of 5043 patients were enrolled into RIVER between January 2015 and June 2017. Mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 69.5 (11.0) years and 55.7% were males. Caucasian patients represented the largest proportion of patients in RIVER (80.3%), followed by Asians (5.5%) and hispanic/latino (3.7%). Almost all patients (98.5%) were prescribed a single daily dose of rivaroxaban, most commonly 20 mg (77.3%) and 15 mg (20.4%), while a 10 mg dose was prescribed in only 2.3% of patients. During the 2-year follow-up, the rates (95% CI) of all-cause mortality, stroke/SE, and major bleeding were 2.75 (2.43 to 3.12), 0.89 (0.72; 1.11), and 1.26 (1.05 to 1.52) per 100 person years, respectively (Figure 1). The most common cardiovascular cause of death was congestive heart failure (30.4%) and myocardial infarction (11.4%). Leading non-cardiovascular causes of death were malignancy (27.4%), respiratory failure (18.9%) and infections/sepsis (13.2%). Over 2 years, 710 (14.1%) of patients discontinued rivaroxaban. The corresponding proportions at 6 months and 1 year were 7.8% and 10.8%, respectively. Out of all the patients who discontinued, 62 (8.7%) restarted rivaroxaban during their follow-up (Table 1). Conclusion During 2 years of follow up in the international, prospective RIVER registry, rivaroxaban treatment for AF was associated with low rates of stroke or major bleeding. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): This work was supported by an unrestricted research grant from Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany, to TRI, London, UK. This work is supported by KANTOR CHARITABLE FOUNDATION for the Kantor-Kakkar Global Centre for Thrombosis Science.

Introduction Rivaroxaban is recommended as an option for anticoagulation in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) with one or more risk factors for stroke. The approved/recommended rivaroxaban dose for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is solely based on renal function: 20 mg once daily (od) for patients with a creatinine clearance [CrCl] ≥50 ml/min and 15 mg od in patients with CrCl 15–49 mL/min). Purpose To assess the patterns of rivaroxaban prescription as per the creatinine clearances levels and to assess the impact of the rivaroxaban dosing on the rate of events at 2-year follow-up in patients with AF. Methods RIVaroxaban Evaluation in Real Life setting (RIVER) is a prospective international registry of patients with newly diagnosed non-valvular AF treated with rivaroxaban for the prevention of thromboembolic stroke and at least one investigator-determined risk factor for stroke. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were obtained through Cox proportional-hazard model. Results Among 3402 patients with normal renal function (CrCl ≥50 mL/min), 82.1% were prescribed the recommended rivaroxaban dose of 20 mg (od) at baseline. Among 524 patients with moderate or severe renal impairment (CrCl 15–50 mL/min), 55.3% patients received rivaroxaban 15 mg (od), 39.9% received 20 mg (od) and 4.2% 10 mg (od). Non-recommended dosing was rare in patients younger than 70 (13.5%) but more frequent in older patients (28.8%). Non-recommended low dosing was more frequent in Asians (38.9%), compared to non-Asian patients (13.8%). Regarding clinical outcomes, adjusted hazards ratios (HR, presented with 95% confidence intervals) showed that the non-recommended low dosing (15 mg od) was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.63 (0.42–0.93)) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.32 (0.13–0.77)) and higher risk of major bleeding (HR 2.86 (1.49–5.50)) in patients with moderate to severe renal impairment (figure 1 and 2). Conclusion In patients with normal renal function, non-recommended low dose rivaroxaban was associated with increased cardiovascular mortality without reducing the risk of major bleeding compared to recommended dosing. In patients with CrCl Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): This work was supported by an unrestricted research grant from Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany, to TRI, London, UK, which sponsors the RIVER registry. This work is supported by KANTOR CHARITABLE FOUNDATION for the Kantor-Kakkar Global Centre for Thrombosis Science.

Background Bleeding risk is highly relevant for treatment decisions in cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). Several risk scores exist, but have never been validated in patients with CAT and are not recommended for practice. Objectives To compare methods of estimating clinically relevant (major and clinically relevant nonmajor) bleeding risk in patients with CAT: (1) existing risk scores for bleeding in venous thromboembolism, (2) pragmatic classification based on cancer type, and (3) new prediction model. Methods In a posthoc analysis of the Hokusai VTE Cancer study, a randomized trial comparing edoxaban with dalteparin for treatment of CAT, seven bleeding risk scores were externally validated (ACCP-VTE, HAS-BLED, Hokusai, Kuijer, Martinez, RIETE, and VTE-BLEED). The predictive performance of these scores was compared with a pragmatic classification based on cancer type (gastrointestinal; genitourinary; other) and a newly derived competing risk-adjusted prediction model based on clinical predictors for clinically relevant bleeding within 6 months after CAT diagnosis with nonbleeding-related mortality as the competing event (“CAT-BLEED”). Results Data of 1,046 patients (149 events) were analyzed. Predictive performance of existing risk scores was poor to moderate (C-statistics: 0.50–0.57; poor calibration). Internal validation of the pragmatic classification and “CAT-BLEED” showed moderate performance (respective C-statistics: 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56–0.66, and 0.63; 95% CI 0.58–0.68; good calibration). Conclusion Existing risk scores for bleeding perform poorly after CAT. Pragmatic classification based on cancer type provides marginally better estimates of clinically relevant bleeding risk. Further improvement may be achieved with “CAT-BLEED,” but this requires external validation in practice-based settings and with other DOACs and its clinical usefulness is yet to be demonstrated.

Although direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have widespread first-line use for treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE), uncertainty remains regarding their efficacy and safety in patients with obesity. We reviewed available data for use of DOACs for VTE treatment and prevention in patients with obesity, including phase 3, phase 4, meta-analyses, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics studies. In addition, we reviewed available data regarding DOACs in bariatric surgery. We provide updated guidance recommendations on using DOACs in patients with obesity for treatment and prevention of VTE, as well as following bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Long-term sequelae of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) include decreased quality of life (QoL). Evidence suggests that adequacy of initial anticoagulant treatment in the acute phase of venous thrombosis has a key impact on late postthrombotic complications. We hypothesize that patients with acute PE treated with edoxaban for acute PE experience have improved QoL compared to those treated with warfarin. METHODS: Patients with PE who participated in the Hokusai-VTE trial were contacted between June 2017 and September 2020 for a single long-term follow-up visit. Main outcomes were the generic and disease-specific QoL measured by the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life questionnaire. RESULTS: We included 251 patients from 26 centers in eight countries, of which 129 (51%) had been assigned to edoxaban and 122 (49%) to warfarin. Patient- and thrombus-specific characteristics were similar in both groups. Mean time since randomization in the Hokusai-VTE trial was 7.0 years (standard deviation, 1.0). No relevant or statistical differences were observed in the QoL for patients treated with edoxaban compared to patients treated with warfarin. The mean difference between patients treated with edoxaban and patients with PE treated with warfarin was 0.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]. -1.6 to 3.2) for the SF-36 summary mental score and 1.6 (95% CI, -0.9 to 4.1) for summary physical score. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that patients with an index PE treated with edoxaban or warfarin have a similar long-term QoL. Since our study was a follow-up study from a well-controlled clinical trial setting, future studies should be designed in a daily clinical practice setting. We suggest a longitudinal design for investigation of changes in QoL over time. ispartof: RESEARCH AND PRACTICE IN THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS vol:5 issue:5 ispartof: location:United States status: published

Background Depending on test assays and the time of last DOAC intake, direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) and direct FXa inhibitors (DXI) may or may not affect prothrombin time (PT), international normalized ratio (INR) or activated thromboplastin time (aPTT) but the clinical impact is unknown. Methods Using data from the Dresden NOAC Registry, we evaluated the impact of DOAC on first PT, INR or aPTT tests during emergency hospitalizations of DTI/DXI patients and the assay performance across 50 coagulation laboratories. Results In 724 emergency admissions (77 DTI; 647 DXI), 490 cases (67.7%) had a reported last DOAC intake within 12 h before blood sampling. INR and PT were elevated above the upper limit of normal (ULN) in >65% of all cases and aPTT was elevated in 45%. On the other hand, >30% of all cases had normal values of INR, PR and aPTT despite a DOAC intake within the last 12 h. Assay performance for detecting or ruling out therapeutic DOAC levels was highly variable and, overall, insufficient to guide clinical decisions. DOAC specific testing was performed in Conclusion Many DOAC recipients present with elevated PT, INR or aPTT during emergency admissions but false negative values within 12 h of last intake as well as elevated values beyond 24 h after last DOAC intake are common. Both scenarios may result in clinical misinterpretation and, potentially, in patient harm, also because DOAC specific testing is rarely performed in emergency settings.

The recent approval of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOAC) for long-term anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism resulted in a rapid implementation of these new drugs into daily care. Although DOAC dosing is similar for women and men and, overall, results in comparable outcomes, sex specific issues need to be considered. This review will discuss DOAC topics specifically related to women's health, including the risks and benefits of DOAC treatment for women, the issue of abnormal uterine bleeding from DOAC and the risk and management of DOAC exposure in pregnancy.

Background Chronic kidney disease (CKD), commonly described by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), is a frequent comorbidity in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and associated with thromboembolic and bleeding complications. Instead of single eGFR measurements, kidney function decline over time may better predict clinical outcomes but this has not been studied so far. Methods Patients with AF and stage 3/4 CKD were prospectively followed within a primary care electronic database from the United Kingdom (IMS-THIN). The associations between the longitudinal eGFR trajectory of these patients and stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding, first hospitalization-for-any-cause, and death-from-any-cause were estimated with joint models of longitudinal and time-to-event data. Results 18,240 patients were included (median age 80.4 years, median CHA2DS2-VASc score 4). In 133,676 eGFR measurements (mean: 6 per patient) median "baseline" eGFR was 49 ml/min/1.73m2 [41–55] and mean eGFR decline was 0.54 ml/min/1.73m2/year (95%CI: 0.47–0.62). During follow-up (median 3.2 years; 50,841 patient-years at risk), 5-year cumulative incidence estimates were 9%, 3%, 32% and 76% for stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding, hospitalization and death, respectively. In joint modeling, an accelerated decline in kidney function strongly predicted for a higher risk of major bleeding (hazard ratio [HR] 1.09 per ml/min/1.73m2/year increase in eGFR decline), hospitalization (HR 1.06), and death-from-any-cause (HR 1.11; all p Conclusions Declining kidney function is a critical determinant of unfavourable outcomes in patients with AF and CKD. Longitudinal kidney function trajectories may enable a much more individualized prediction of adverse outcomes in this vulnerable patient population.

We sought to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and safety of prolonged anticoagulation with rivaroxaban following a provoked venous thromboembolism.Using US MarketScan claims from November 2012 to March 2017, we identified adults with ≥1 primary hospitalization or emergency department diagnosis code for venous thromboembolism, a provoking (major or minor, persistent or transient) risk factor, at least 3 months of continuous rivaroxaban treatment, and ≥12 months of continuous insurance benefits prior to their qualifying venous thromboembolism. Patients were categorized as either continuing rivaroxaban or discontinuing anticoagulation (no anticoagulation or nonaspirin antiplatelet agents but may have received aspirin) after the initial 3 months of rivaroxaban treatment (index date). Differences in baseline covariates between cohorts were adjusted for using inverse probability-of-treatment weights based on propensity scores (absolute standardized differences0.1 achieved for all covariates after adjustment). Twelve month incidences of recurrent venous thromboembolism or major bleeding were compared between cohorts using Cox regression (according to an intention-to-treat methodology) and reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).Among patients experiencing a provoked venous thromboembolism and treated with rivaroxaban for the first 3 months (N=4,990), continued rivaroxaban use beyond 3 months (median [25%, 75% range duration of additional rivaroxaban use = 3 [2, 5] months) was associated with a 44% (95% CI of 9%-66%) lower hazard of recurrent venous thromboembolism without altering major bleeding risk [HR of 0.87, 95% CI of 0.51-1.49] versus anticoagulation discontinuation (with or without aspirin use).Our study suggests continuing rivaroxaban after the initial 3 month period was associated with a decreased risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism. The observed reduction in recurrent venous thromboembolism with prolonged rivaroxaban use was not associated with a significant change in major bleeding risk.

Background Clinical practice shows that venous thromboembolism (VTE) presents a substantial burden in medical patients, and awareness and advocacy for its primary and secondary prevention remains inadequate. Specific patient populations, such as those with cancer and the critically ill, show elevated risk for VTE, bleeding or both, and significant gaps in VTE prophylaxis and treatment exist in these groups. Objective To present current expert insights and evidence on the unmet needs in thromboprophylaxis, and on the treatment of VTE in two high-risk patient groups: patients with cancer and the critically ill. Methodology To identify specific unmet needs in the management of VTE, a methodology was designed and implemented that assessed gaps in prophylaxis and treatment of VTE through interviews with 44 experts in the field of thrombosis and haemostasis, and through a review of current guidelines and seminal studies to substantiate the insights provided by the experts. The research findings were then analysed, discussed and consolidated by a multidisciplinary group of experts. Results The gap analysis methodology identified shortcomings in the VTE risk assessment tools, patient stratification approaches for prophylaxis, and the suboptimal use of anticoagulants for primary prophylaxis and treatment. Conclusions Specifically, patients with cancer need better VTE risk assessment tools to tailor primary thromboprophylaxis to tumour types and disease stages, and the potential for drug–drug interactions needs to be considered. In critically ill patients, unfractionated heparin is not advised as a first-line treatment option, low-molecular weight heparins remain the first choice for prophylaxis in critically ill and cancer patients due to their safety and efficacy profile, and the strength of evidence is increasing for direct oral anticoagulants as a treatment option over low-molecular-weight heparins. Herein we present novel insights and consolidated evidence collected from experts, clinical practice guidelines and original studies on the unmet needs in thromboprophylaxis, and on the treatment of VTE in patients with cancer and the critically ill.

Essentials In 2016 the SSC proposed definitions for effective hemostasis in management of major bleeding. To validate these definitions, we studied the use in three large anticoagulant-reversal studies. Method agreement analysis and interobserver reliability showed at least acceptable agreement. Recommendations were made, advising use of the definition in hemostatic effectiveness studies. SUMMARY: Introduction In 2016 the Scientific and Standardization Subcommittee (SSC) on Control of Anticoagulation of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) proposed criteria to evaluate the effectiveness of anticoagulant reversal in major bleeding management. Testing and validation of these criteria are required. Objective To investigate the method agreement, interobserver reliability and applicability of the ISTH proposed definitions for hemostatic effectiveness. Methods Patient data from three anticoagulant-antidote studies were used for hemostatic effectiveness assessment using the ISTH-proposed definitions and clinical opinion. For every patient a case document was produced. For each cohort, four adjudicators were asked to assess the hemostatic effectiveness independently on a case-by-case basis. Agreement between the two methods of hemostatic effectiveness assessment was calculated using Cohen's kappa (κ), with a calculated sample size of at least 73 cases. Results The full dataset consisted of 116 cases, resulting in 464 assessments. Method agreement in outcome was observed in 364 of 464 assessments (78.5%), resulting in κ of 0.634 (95% CI: 0.575-0.694), or "substantial agreement." Interobserver reliability analysis of the proposed definitions computed an overall agreement of 54.2% with κ of 0.312 ("fair agreement"). Discussion Method agreement analysis shows that the conclusions drawn using the ISTH definitions have "substantial agreement" with clinical opinion. Interobserver reliability analysis demonstrated acceptable agreement. In-depth analysis provided minor opportunities for further improvement and correct application of the definition. The definition is recommended to be used in all future studies evaluating hemostatic effectiveness, taking the suggested recommendations into account.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are replacing warfarin and other vitamin K antagonists for a wide range of indications. Advantages of DOAC therapy are fewer food and drug interactions and fixed dosing without routine laboratory monitoring, making DOACs the perfect choice especially for younger patients, in whom the main indication for anticoagulation is prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Although DOACs are safer and much more convenient than other anticoagulant alternatives, their profile may have drawbacks, especially for younger female patients in whom reproductive issues need special considerations. These may include the issue of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) during anticoagulant therapy, the embryotoxicity risk from inadvertent DOAC exposure during pregnancy, and the prevention or planning of pregnancies during DOAC therapy. This review summarizes the most relevant evidence in this increasingly important field of women’s health.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate first trimester anticoagulant exposure and risks of adverse pregnancy-related and fetal outcomes. Methods: Using Danish nationwide registries, we identified all pregnant women with preconception venous thromboembolism, 2000-2017, and linked data on exposure to low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), vitamin K antagonist (VKA), or non-VKA oral anticoagulant (NOAC) during pregnancy. We assessed pregnancy-related and fetal outcomes associated with first trimester anticoagulant exposure. Results: Among 4490 pregnancies in women with preconception venous thromboembolism (mean age 31 years, 40% nulliparous) during the first trimester, 63.1% were unexposed, 25.9% were exposed to LMWH, 10.4% VKA, and 0.6% NOAC. Adverse outcomes were lowest in unexposed and LMWH exposed. Compared with unexposed, VKA was associated with higher risks of preterm (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.70-2.99) and very preterm birth (adjusted OR 3.78; 95% CI, 1.91-7.49), shorter mean gestational age was associated with VKA (−7.5 days; 95% CI, −9.1 to −5.9 days) or NOAC (−2.3 days; 95% CI, −8.4-3.8), and lower mean birthweight with VKA (−55 g; 95% CI, −103.1 to −8.5) or NOAC (−190 g; 95% CI, −364.1 to −16.4). Adjusted ORs for small-for-gestational-age infants were 1.07 (95% CI, 0.77-1.50) with VKA, and 3.29 (95% CI, 1.26-7.95) with NOAC. Mean 5-minute Apgar score (9.8) and congenital defect prevalence (8.4%-10%) varied little across exposure groups. Conclusions: Fetal risk was lowest in unexposed and LMWH-exposed pregnancies, supporting the recommendation of LMWH during pregnancy. NOAC safety during pregnancy is unclear due to the rarity of NOAC exposure.

Background Lack of data on balancing bleeding and thrombosis risk causes uncertainty about restarting anticoagulants after major bleeding. Anticoagulant reversal trials offer prospectively gathered data after major bleeding with well-documented safety events and restarting behavior. Objectives To examine the relationship of restarting anticoagulation with thrombosis, rebleeding, and death. Methods This is a posthoc analysis of a prospective factor Xa inhibitor reversal study at 63 centers in North America and Europe. We compared outcomes of restarted patients with those not restarted using landmark and time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models. Outcomes included thrombotic and bleeding events and death and a composite of all three. Results Of 352 patients enrolled, oral anticoagulation was restarted in 100 (28%) during 30-day follow-up. Thirty-four (9.7%) had thrombotic events, 15 (4.3%) had bleeding events (after day 3), and 49 (14%) died. In the landmark analysis comparing patients restarted within 14 days to those not, restarting was associated with decreased thrombotic events (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.112; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.001–0.944; p = 0.043) and increased rebleeding (HR = 8.39; 95% CI: 1.13–62.29; p = 0.037). The time-dependent Cox model showed evidence for a reduction in a composite (thrombotic events, bleeding, and death) attempting to capture net benefit (HR = 0.384; 95% CI: 0.161–0.915; p = 0.031). Conclusion This analysis provides modest evidence that restarting anticoagulation in factor Xa inhibitor-associated major bleeding patients is correlated with reduced risk of thrombotic events and increased risk of rebleeding. There is low-level evidence of net benefit for restarting. A randomized trial of restarting would be appropriate.

Preventing thromboembolic events, while minimizing bleeding risks, remains challenging when managing patients with atrial fibrillation. Despite large and successful trial programs, several clinical concerns remain which commonly relate to fears of over- or underexposure to drugs and unfavorable outcomes. After a short summary of the main phase III trial findings, this short review discusses the evidence and clinical relevance of common clinical concerns (correct direct oral anticoagulant [DOAC] dosing; DOAC in moderate-to-severe renal impairment; and the relevance of fasting, nasogastric tube feeding, or high body mass index) on DOAC plasma levels. Finally, the need for specific DOAC antidotes will be addressed.

Background Rivaroxaban may induce heavy menstrual bleeding. It is unknown if this effect is dose related or if rivaroxaban is associated with more menstrual bleeding than aspirin. Objectives To demonstrate and compare menstrual patterns and actions taken among women receiving aspirin and two doses of rivaroxaban. Methods The EINSTEIN‐CHOICE trial compared once‐daily rivaroxaban 20 mg, rivaroxaban 10 mg, and aspirin 100 mg for extended treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients who had completed 6 to 12 months of anticoagulant therapy. In 362 women with menstrual cycles, menstrual flow duration and intensity assessed at days 30, 90, 180, and 360 were compared with those before starting anticoagulant therapy. Results Menstrual flow duration increased in 12%‐18% of the 134 women given 20‐mg rivaroxaban, in 6% to 12% of 120 women given 10‐mg rivaroxaban, and in 9% to 12% of 108 women given aspirin. Corresponding increases in flow intensity were 19% to 24%, 14% to 21%, and 13% to 20%. The odds ratios (ORs) for increased menstrual flow duration were 1.36 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62‐2.96) for rivaroxaban 20 mg versus aspirin, 0.77 (95% CI, 0.33‐1.81) for rivaroxaban 10 mg versus aspirin, and 0.57 (95% CI, 0.26‐1.25) for rivaroxaban 10 mg versus 20 mg. The ORs for increased menstrual flow intensity were 1.41 (95% CI, 0.67‐2.99), 1.07 (95% CI, 0.49‐2.34), and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.37‐ 1.57), respectively. Conclusions There were no statistically significant differences in menstrual hemorrhage patterns between women treated with 10 or 20 mg of rivaroxaban and aspirin. Compared with 10‐mg rivaroxaban or aspirin, 20‐mg rivaroxaban showed numerically more often increased menstrual flow duration and intensity.

Aims This is an official interdisciplinary guideline published and coordinated by the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG), the Austrian Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (OEGGG) and the Swiss Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (SGGG). The guideline was developed for use in German-speaking regions and is backed by numerous professional societies and organizations. The aim of this guideline is to provide an evidence- and consensus-based overview of the diagnostic approach and the management of hormonal contraception based on a systematic evaluation of the relevant literature. Methods To compile this S3-guideline, a systematic search for evidence was carried out in PubMed and the Cochrane Library to adapt existing guidelines and identify relevant reviews and meta-analyses. A structured evaluation of the evidence was subsequently carried out on behalf of the Guidelines Commission of the DGGG, and a structured consensus was achieved based on consensus conferences attended by representative members from the different specialist societies and professions. Recommendations Evidence-based recommendations about the advice given to women requesting contraception were compiled. The guideline particularly focuses on prescribing contraceptives which are appropriate to womenʼs individual needs, take account of her personal circumstances, and have few or no side effects.

Introduction Clinical guidelines recommend anticoagulation therapy for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE), but little is known about preferences. Therefore, the objective of this discrete choice experiment (DCE) was to elucidate patient preferences regarding anticoagulation convenience attributes. Methods Adult patients with cancer-associated VTE who switched to direct oral anticoagulants were included in a single-arm study (COSIMO). Patients were asked to decide between hypothetical treatment options based on a combination of the following attributes: route of administration (injection/tablet), frequency of intake (once/twice daily), need for regular controls of the international normalized ratio (INR) at least every 3 to 4 weeks (yes/no), interactions with food/alcohol (yes/no), and distance to treating physician (1 vs. 20 km) as an additional neutral attribute. DCE data were collected by structured telephone interviews and analyzed based on a conditional logit regression. Results Overall, 163 patients (mean age 63.7 years, 49.1% female) were included. They strongly preferred oral administration compared with self-injections (importance of this attribute for overall treatment decisions: 73.8%), and a treatment without dietary restrictions (11.8%). Even if these attributes were less important (7.2% and 6.5%, respectively), patients indicated a preference for a shorter distance to the treating physician and once-daily dosing compared with twice-daily intake. “Need for regular controls of INR at least every 3 to 4 weeks” showed no significant impact on the treatment decision (0.7%). Conclusion This study showed that treatment-related decision making in cancer-associated VTE, assuming comparable effectiveness and safety of anticoagulant treatments, is predominantly driven by “route of administration,” with patients strongly preferring oral administration.

Introduction: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) are at increased risk for both ischemic stroke and hemorrhage. In addition, treatment with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) has been associated with worsening of renal function compared to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). XARENO (Factor XA -inhibition in RENal patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation Observational registry) is an ongoing prospective, non-interventional, observational study conducted in Europe. XARENO evaluates the effectiveness of rivaroxaban in preserving renal function and preventing thromboembolic events as compared to VKA in NVAF patients with CKD in clinical practice. Methods: XARENO included male and female NVAF patients ≥18 years old with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) between 15 and 49 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 and an indication for anticoagulation. Enrolment took place from April 2016 until January 2020. Patients treated with either rivaroxaban or VKA were included, while patients in whom physicians were withholding any anticoagulation could be also enrolled. Minimal planned follow-up is one year. Primary observational outcomes include efficacy and safety outcomes (progression of CKD, stroke, other thromboembolic events, major cardiovascular events, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality). First results on outcomes in the full cohort are expected in 2021. Results: In this analysis of a first set of 1485 patients (56.1% males), 731 and 666 patients received rivaroxaban and VKA, while 88 patients did not receive any anticoagulation. Mean age at baseline was 77.3 years (67.5% older than 75 years) with a mean eGFR of 38.9 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 . Overall 74.7% of patients had eGFR values below 45 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 and 28.0% below 30 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 . In the latter group, use of a VKA was about twofold more frequent compared to rivaroxaban. Conclusions: This first analysis of XARENO patients reveals the very high age of NVAF patients with concomitant non-dialysis dependent advanced CKD and a preferential use of VKA in stage 4 CKD. XARENO aims to provide important information on the real-world effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban compared with VKA for this vulnerable patient group.

IntroductionEarly discharge of patients with acute low-risk pulmonary embolism requires validation by prospective trials with clinical and quality-of-life outcomes.MethodsThe multinational Home Treatment of Patients with Low-Risk Pulmonary Embolism with the Oral Factor Xa Inhibitor Rivaroxaban (HoT-PE) single-arm management trial investigated early discharge followed by ambulatory treatment with rivaroxaban. The study was stopped for efficacy after the positive results of the predefined interim analysis at 50% of the planned population. The present analysis includes the entire trial population (576 patients). In addition to 3-month recurrence (primary outcome) and 1-year overall mortality, we analysed self-reported disease-specific (Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life (PEmb-QoL) questionnaire) and generic (five-level five-dimension EuroQoL (EQ-5D-5L) scale) quality of life as well as treatment satisfaction (Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS)) after pulmonary embolism.ResultsThe primary efficacy outcome occurred in three (0.5%, one-sided upper 95% CI 1.3%) patients. The 1-year mortality was 2.4%. The mean±sdPEmb-QoL decreased from 28.9±20.6% at 3 weeks to 19.9±15.4% at 3 months, a mean change (improvement) of −9.1% (pConclusionsOur results further support early discharge and ambulatory oral anticoagulation for selected patients with low-risk pulmonary embolism. Targeted strategies may be necessary to further improve quality of life in specific patient subgroups.

BACKGROUND In patients on anticoagulant treatment, the major bleeding (MB) definition released by the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) is widely accepted. However, this definition identifies MBs with highly variable short-term risk of death. OBJECTIVES The study aims were to derive and validate a classification of ISTH-defined MBs for the risk of short-term death. METHODS Consecutive patients admitted for ISTH-defined MB occurring while on treatment with oral anticoagulants were included in the study and divided into a derivation and a validation cohort. Death within 30 days was the primary study outcome. RESULTS Among 1077 patients with MB, 64/517 and 63/560 patients in the derivation and validation cohort died, respectively. In the derivation cohort, Glasgow coma scale (GCS)

Background: Although rivaroxaban has demonstrated consistent drug levels in normal weight and obese patients, sufficient confirmation of equal clinical effectiveness and safety is currently lacking...

The effectiveness and safety of venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment with apixaban, demonstrated in phase III trials, need to be confirmed in daily care.Using data from the prospective, noninterventional cross-indication Dresden NOAC Registry we evaluated rates of VTE recurrence and bleeding complications during apixaban treatment of VTE patients. For this analysis, we only included patients with acute VTE who started apixaban within 14 days after diagnosis and who were enrolled within these 14 days. Patient characteristics, treatment persistence, and clinical outcomes were assessed.Between August 1st, 2014 and October 31, 2018, 352 patients with apixaban treatment for acute VTE were enrolled. During treatment (median exposure 13.7 ± 9.8 months; median follow-up 21.7 ± 6.1 months) rates of recurrent VTE and International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis major bleeding were 1.3/100 pt.years (95% confidence interval or CI 0.4–3.0) and 1.5/100 pt.years (0.6–3.3), respectively. At 6 months. 68.6% of patients were still taking apixaban, 23.9% had a scheduled end of treatment, 6.3% were switched to other anticoagulants, and the remaining 2.3% had unplanned complete discontinuation of anticoagulation.Of the 188 patients stopping apixaban, 12 (6.4%) experienced a recurrent VTE (six pulmonary embolisms ± deep vein thrombosis, six deep vein thrombosis; mean time between stopping anticoagulation and VTE recurrence 5.2 ± 4.1 months [range 14–417 days]).Our findings suggest that, in daily care, apixaban demonstrated high effectiveness, safety, and persistence in the treatment of acute VTE with low rates of unplanned discontinuation.

Edoxaban is licensed in many countries around the world, following successful phase-III trials in stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (SPAF) and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE), but at present, little is known about edoxaban-related bleeding complications in daily care. Using data from a prospective, non-interventional oral anticoagulation registry, we analysed rates, management and outcome of edoxaban-related bleeding. Between 1 October 2011 and 28 February 2019, 996 patients were enrolled in the edoxaban cohort and a total of 891 bleeding events were observed (53.2% ISTH minor, 41.9% clinically relevant non-major and 4.9% major bleeding events). In case of major bleeding, surgical or interventional treatment was performed in 25.0% and prothrombin complex concentrate was given in 2 cases. In the time-to-first-event analysis, 100-patient-year rates of major bleeding were 3.1/100 patient-years (95% CI 2.2-4.2). In the as-exposed analysis, case-fatality rates of edoxaban-associated bleeding leading to hospitalizations were 7.5% and 9.0% at days 30 and 90 post bleeding, respectively. Taken together, our data indicate that, in real life, rates of edoxaban-related major bleeding in line with rates observed in phase III trials and that bleeding pattern, management and outcome of these events are not different from those reported for other direct factor Xa inhibitors. Clinical Trial Notation: Dresden NOAC Registry - ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01588119.

Background: Recently, the randomised EINSTEIN-Jr. study showed similar efficacy and safety for rivaroxaban and standard anticoagulation for acute and continued treatment of paediatric venous thromboembolism (VTE). The rivaroxaban dosing strategy was established based on phase 1 and 2 data in children and through pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling. Methods: Rivaroxaban treatment with tablets or the newly-developed granules-for-oral suspension formulation was bodyweight-adjusted and administered once-daily, twice-daily or thrice-daily for children with bodyweights of ≥30, ≥12

Contains fulltext : 219893.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) BACKGROUND: Treatment of venous thromboembolism in children is based on data obtained in adults with little direct documentation of its efficacy and safety in children. The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban versus standard anticoagulants in children with venous thromboembolism. METHODS: In a multicentre, parallel-group, open-label, randomised study, children (aged 0-17 years) attending 107 paediatric hospitals in 28 countries with documented acute venous thromboembolism who had started heparinisation were assigned (2:1) to bodyweight-adjusted rivaroxaban (tablets or suspension) in a 20-mg equivalent dose or standard anticoagulants (heparin or switched to vitamin K antagonist). Randomisation was stratified by age and venous thromboembolism site. The main treatment period was 3 months (1 month in children /=1 dose), were centrally assessed by investigators who were unaware of treatment assignment. Repeat imaging was obtained at the end of the main treatment period and compared with baseline imaging tests. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02234843 and has been completed. FINDINGS: From Nov 14, 2014, to Sept 28, 2018, 500 (96%) of the 520 children screened for eligibility were enrolled. After a median follow-up of 91 days (IQR 87-95) in children who had a study treatment period of 3 months (n=463) and 31 days (IQR 29-35) in children who had a study treatment period of 1 month (n=37), symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism occurred in four (1%) of 335 children receiving rivaroxaban and five (3%) of 165 receiving standard anticoagulants (hazard ratio [HR] 0.40, 95% CI 0.11-1.41). Repeat imaging showed an improved effect of rivaroxaban on thrombotic burden as compared with standard anticoagulants (p=0.012). Major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding in participants who received >/=1 dose occurred in ten (3%) of 329 children (all non-major) receiving rivaroxaban and in three (2%) of 162 children (two major and one non-major) receiving standard anticoagulants (HR 1.58, 95% CI 0.51-6.27). Absolute and relative efficacy and safety estimates of rivaroxaban versus standard anticoagulation estimates were similar to those in rivaroxaban studies in adults. There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: In children with acute venous thromboembolism, treatment with rivaroxaban resulted in a similarly low recurrence risk and reduced thrombotic burden without increased bleeding, as compared with standard anticoagulants. FUNDING: Bayer AG and Janssen Research & Development. 01 januari 2020

OBJECTIVES To assess the association between rivaroxaban and warfarin and major bleeding risk in unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) patients. METHODS Using US MarketScan claims from 1/2012-12/2016, we identified patients who had ≥1 primary hospitalization/emergency department visit diagnosis code for an unprovoked VTE, newly initiated on rivaroxaban or warfarin within 30 days after the VTE and ≥12 months of insurance coverage prior to the VTE. Differences in baseline covariates were adjusted using inverse-probability-of-treatment weights based on propensity scores (residual absolute standardized differences

Introduction For treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), rivaroxaban is given in fixed doses without routine coagulation monitoring. Patients and methods To determine whether monitoring would enhance its benefit-risk profile, we examined whether peak and trough prothrombin time (PT) values measured in 3797 rivaroxaban-treated patients included in the EINSTEIN DVT and PE studies correlated with subsequent recurrent VTE and major bleeding. In addition, we examined the stability of PT values over time and the impact of clinical variables on PT values. Results The mean peak PT values at months 3 and 6 or 12 were 21.9 ± 5 and 21.7 ± 6.0 s, respectively, while the mean trough PT values at months 2 and 6 were 15.1 ± 5.1 and 15.3 ± 2.9 s, respectively. Although peak and through PT values were higher in females, and with older age, frailty, active cancer, low body weight, impaired renal function and use of moderate to strong inhibitors of CYP3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein, and were lower in patients taking strong CYP 3A4 inducers, the differences were small and results were overlapping. Neither peak nor trough PT values correlated with recurrent VTE or major bleeding. Conclusions PT monitoring is unlikely to improve the benefit-risk profile of rivaroxaban in patients with DVT or PE. The study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as # NCT00440193 (EINSTEIN-DVT) and # NCT00439777 (EINSTEIN-PE).

In the Hokusai VTE Cancer study, edoxaban was non-inferior to dalteparin for the composite outcome of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding in 1,050 patients with cancer-associated VTE. The absolute rate of recurrent VTE was 3.4% lower with edoxaban, whereas the absolute rate of major bleeding was 2.9% higher. The present analysis focuses on the sites, clinical presentation, course and outcome of bleeding events, and the associated tumour types. Major bleeds and their severity (categories 1–4) were blindly adjudicated by a committee using a priori defined criteria, and data were analysed in the safety population. Major bleeding occurred in 32 of 522 patients given edoxaban (median treatment duration, 211 days) and in 16 of 524 patients treated with dalteparin (median treatment duration, 184 days); no patients had more than one major bleed. There were no fatal bleeds with edoxaban, and two with dalteparin. Severe bleeding at presentation (category 3 or 4) occurred in 10 (1.9%) and 11 (2.1%) patients in the edoxaban and dalteparin groups, respectively. The excess of major bleeding with edoxaban was confined to patients with gastrointestinal cancer. However, severe major bleeding at presentation (category 3 or 4) in this sub-group occurred in 5 of 165 (3.0%) and in 3 of 140 (2.1%) patients given edoxaban or dalteparin, respectively.In conclusion, this analysis suggests that while oral edoxaban is an appropriate alternative to subcutaneous dalteparin for treatment of cancer-associated VTE, the use of edoxaban in patients with gastrointestinal cancer requires careful benefit–risk weighting.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common, potentially preventable cause of morbidity and mortality among acute medically ill patients. More than half of VTE events in this population occur after hospital discharge. Thus, providing extended-duration VTE prophylaxis from in-hospital through the post-discharge continuum may improve the quality of care in patients at risk of VTE. Betrixaban is a new oral, once-daily factor Xa inhibitor approved by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for extended-duration prophylaxis of VTE in acute medically ill patients. The clinical efficacy and safety of betrixaban in acute medically ill patients perceived to be at high risk for VTE were evaluated in a large, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multinational clinical trial [Acute Medically Ill VTE Prevention With Extended Duration Betrixaban (APEX)]. Patients were randomized to receive subcutaneous enoxaparin (10 ± 4 days) or oral betrixaban (35–42 days) plus matching placebos. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of asymptomatic proximal deep vein thrombosis and symptomatic VTE; the primary safety measure was major bleeding. Extended-duration betrixaban reduced VTE events without an increase in major bleeding in the modified intent-to-treat analysis. Post hoc analyses of the APEX trial provided further evidence to support the efficacy and safety of betrixaban in reducing all-cause ischaemic stroke, fatal or irreversible ischaemic or bleeding events, as well as reducing VTE-related rehospitalization. In summary, analyses of the APEX study demonstrated a positive benefit–risk profile for extended prophylaxis of VTE with betrixaban in acute medically ill patients. This is likely to have important public health and health economic implications.

The optimal duration of anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism (VTE) is uncertain. In this prespecified analysis, we used data from 2 randomized trials, which compared once-daily rivaroxaban (20 mg or 10 mg) with aspirin (100 mg) or placebo for extended VTE treatment to estimate the risk of recurrence according to baseline risk factor profiles. Index VTE events were centrally classified as unprovoked, or provoked by major transient or persistent, or minor transient or persistent risk factors, and rates of recurrence at 1 year were calculated. A total of 2832 patients received rivaroxaban; 1131 received aspirin, and 590 received placebo. With unprovoked VTE, rates of recurrence in the 1173 patients given rivaroxaban, the 468 given aspirin, and the 243 given placebo were 2.0%, 5.9%, and 10.0%, respectively. There were no recurrences in patients with VTE provoked by major transient risk factors. With VTE provoked by minor persistent risk factors, recurrence rates in the 1184 patients given rivaroxaban, the 466 given aspirin, and the 248 given placebo were 2.4%, 4.5%, and 10.7%, respectively. For patients with minor transient risk factors, recurrence rates were 0.4% in the 268 patients given rivaroxaban, 4.2% in the 121 given aspirin, and 7.1% in the 56 given placebo. Recurrence rates in patients with VTE provoked by minor persistent or minor transient risk factors were not significantly lower than that with unprovoked VTE (hazard ratio [HR], 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-1.16; and HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.32-1.30, respectively). Therefore, such patients may also benefit from extended anticoagulation therapy.