Dear Editor: Ordinary photography may not fully represent patients' skin status, but digital photography using a consistent and appropriate light-emitting diode (LED) illuminator could provide more objective and reliable images and colorimetric data1. Previous studies have shown that parallel-polarized light (PPL) images taken with green LED show more significant quantitative differences, depending on the state of the skin, than those taken with white LED2,3. This study aimed to determine the skin diseases appropriate for an analytic technique using PPL images taken with green and white LEDs. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the Korea University College of Medicine Anam Hospital (IRB ED13197). Between September 2013 and August 2014, 73 subjects were enrolled in a prospective study. Among the subjects, 10 or more had one of the following diseases: acne, atopic dermatitis, nummular eczema, rosacea, seborrheic dermatitis, senile pruritus, and xerotic dermatitis (Table 1). Subjects taking systemic or topical medications that can interfere with the skin status, including diuretics, corticosteroids, retinoids, and H2 anti-histamine agents, were excluded. Subjects with underlying conditions that may affect the skin surface, such as pregnancy, nutrient deficiency, thyroid dysfunction, serious diseases (e.g., malignancies), and skin disorders requiring treatment, were also excluded. Subjects were recruited regardless of sex and age. Table 1 Demographic data of the patients A digital, single-lens reflex camera (EOS-500D; Canon Inc., Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a macro lens (SP MF 90 mm F/2.8 Di Macro 1:1; Tamron Co., Ltd., Saitama, Japan) was used, and a rotatable polarizing filter was placed over the camera lens. The same in-house skin conductance meter as that in the previous study was used3. PPL photographs were taken with a polarizing, filtered camera, with green and white LED illuminators attached respectively at each side of the camera at an angle of 45° (Fig. 1). All photographs were obtained under the same conditions, with the same settings and distances with either green or white LED illuminators. Photographs were taken of every skin lesion and surrounding normal skin in each subject. Fig. 1 A schematic diagram of the equipment. PL: polarized light, LED: light-emitting diode. Disease severity was evaluated using a 5-point investigator's global assessment scale, and dryness was graded for severity with a score from 0 to 6 using the xerosis severity scale4. Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage LAB (CIELAB) values were obtained from the PPL images by converting sRGB to CIELAB coordinates based on a previous study5. Equations and a matrix conversion were derived using graphics software (Adobe Photoshop Elements; Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) and a spreadsheet program (Excel 2010; Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA). Statistical software IBM SPSS Statistics version 21.0 for Windows (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analyses. All values were tested by Pearson or Spearman correlation with statistical significance set at p