1. Preventability of unplanned readmissions within 30 days of discharge. A cross-sectional, single-center study
- Author
-
Geke M. Overvliet, J. Nina M. Heijnen, Sanne L. Jansen, Fatma Karapinar-Çarkit, Pim B. J. E. Hulshof, Marijn Radersma, George Tokmaji, Eva L. Kneepkens, Sofieke C. Wijers, Albertine M. B. van der Does, Carl E. H. Siegert, Paul F. Teunissen, Louise Schilder, and Elien B. Uitvlugt
- Subjects
Male ,Medical Doctors ,Cross-sectional study ,Nosocomial Infections ,Health Care Providers ,Vascular damage Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 16] ,Logistic regression ,Pharmacists ,0302 clinical medicine ,Hospitals, Urban ,Multidisciplinary approach ,Health care ,Outpatients ,Medicine and Health Sciences ,Public and Occupational Health ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Medical Personnel ,Netherlands ,Allied Health Care Professionals ,Aged, 80 and over ,Multidisciplinary ,030503 health policy & services ,Age Factors ,Middle Aged ,Patient Discharge ,Professions ,Infectious Diseases ,Medicine ,Female ,0305 other medical science ,Research Article ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Patients ,Science ,Clinical Decision-Making ,Patient Readmission ,03 medical and health sciences ,Diagnostic Medicine ,General Practitioners ,Physicians ,medicine ,Humans ,Patient participation ,Hospitals, Teaching ,Preventive healthcare ,Aged ,Physician-Patient Relations ,business.industry ,Clinical pharmacy ,Health Care ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,Logistic Models ,Emergency medicine ,People and Places ,Observational study ,Population Groupings ,Preventive Medicine ,Patient Participation ,business - Abstract
Contains fulltext : 220997.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) OBJECTIVES: To identify the preventability, determinants and causes of unplanned hospital readmissions within 30 days of discharge using a multidisciplinary approach and including patients' perspectives. DESIGN: A prospective cross-sectional single-center study. SETTING: Urban teaching hospital in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 430 patients were included. Inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 18 years, discharged from one of seven participating clinical departments and an unplanned readmission within 30 days. METHODS: Residents from the participating departments individually assessed whether the readmission was caused by healthcare, the preventability and possible causes of readmissions using a tool. Thereafter, the preventability of the cases was discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting with residents of all participating departments and clinical pharmacists. The primary outcome was the proportion of readmissions that were potentially preventable. Secondary outcomes were the determinants for a readmission, causes for preventable readmissions, the change in the final decision on preventability after the multidisciplinary meeting and the value of patient interviews in assessing preventability. Differences in characteristics of potentially preventable readmissions (PPRs) and non-PPRs were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 430 readmissions, 56 (13%) were assessed as PPRs. Age was significantly associated with a PPR (adjusted OR: 2.42; 95%, CI 1.23-4.74; p = 0.01). The main causes for PPRs were diagnostic (30%), medication (27%) and management problems (27%). During the multidisciplinary meeting, the final decision on preventability changed in 11% of the cases. When a patient interview was available, it was used as a source of information to assess preventability in 26% of readmissions. In 7% of cases, the patient interview was mentioned as the most important source. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: 13% of readmissions were potentially preventable with diagnostic, medication or management problems being main causes. A multidisciplinary review approach and including the patient's perspective could contribute to a better understanding of the complexity of readmissions and possible improvements.
- Published
- 2020