Search

The skin tumour unit at one London hospital has been providing extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) treatment since 2012, using an online fully integrated system. This report summarises 9 years of continuous process improvement, which has enabled the team to meet the growing demand for ECP treatments for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) patients. The unit formed a partnership with a lean-management company to go through the process of evaluation of capacity constraints, design layout and patient scheduling. Methods: Increased capacity year-on-year and over the 9-year period was calculated based on data collected from records. The authors reviewed the nurse staffing resources allocated for ECP treatments over the same period, and financial value created by the continuous improvement (additional number of treatments multiplied by the national tariff for ECP treatments). Results: In 2012 the average number of ECP treatments per nurse per week was 11. With the implementation of the new planning tool, and improved working practices, the average number of treatments per nurse per week has more than doubled to 23. Nurse staffing was maintained at 4 nurses per shift to deliver ECP treatments. The unit recorded additional revenue of approximately £3.2 million in 2020 compared with 2012. Conclusions: The team has successfully increased the capacity of the service to deliver treatments without incurring any additional nursing costs, resulting in more patients with CTCL and GvHD being able to access ECP treatment and a cost benefit for the Trust. The service continues in its mission to grow and provide a superior patient experience.

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has been considered for treatment of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc).To study the 12-month effects of ECP on laboratory parameters and evaluate the SSc-related long-term survival.59 SSc patients who had received at least 6 ECP cycles were included. Lab parameters were assessed at baseline (ECP naïve), after 6 months, and after 12 months. 20-year follow-up data were collected for all patients.31 (59/52.5%) patients presented with elevated serum III procollagen (sPIIINP) levels at baseline which significantly declined after 6- and 12-month ECP. Total lymphocyte counts as well as circulating immune complexes (CICs) significantly decreased after 12-months ECP. On long-term follow-up, patients had received a median of 37.5 (6-167) ECP cycles over a median period of 64 (6-281) months. 20-year follow-up revealed only 8 (59/13.6%) SSc-related deaths and 51 (59/86.4%) survivors.One-year ECP induces changes in lab parameters, such as sPIIINP, CICs, and lymphocyte counts, which have previously been implicated in the pathogenesis of SSc. More importantly, our data reveal, for the first time, that ECP-treated SSc patients appear to have extremely favorable 20-year survival rates compared to other SSc cohorts reported in the literature.

We conducted a multicenter interventional study to assess the efficacy of Therakos ECP to treat steroid-resistant graft-vs-host disease (SRes-GVHD) after allogeneic HSCT and to identify biomarkers of GVHD response. A total of 62 patients were treated for acute SRes-GVHD (n = 37) or chronic SRes-GVHD (n = 25). Median time to best response was 35 days (range, 28-85) and 90 days (range, 27-240) in acute and chronic SRes-GVHD, respectively. Overall, 27 patients (72.9%) with SRes-aGVHD responded to treatment (40.5% CR and 32.4% PR). The response rate was significantly higher in grade I-II than in grade III-IV aGVHD (100% vs 50.0%, respectively, P-value = .001). In chronic SRes-GVHD, 22 patients (88%) achieved a clinical response (24.0% CR and 64% PR). Response was higher in moderate than in severe SRes-cGVHD (100% vs 75%, P = .096). In both acute and chronic SRes-GVHD patients, the percentage of peripheral blood CD3+ CD4+ was higher and CD3+ CD8+ lower in responding than nonresponding patients. Acute SRes-GVHD responding patients presented a higher number of Treg cells (CD4+ CD25+ CD127low/- ) at day 0 (P = .028) than nonresponding patients, differences that were maintained over the observation period. Phenotypic analysis of T-cell maturation showed a trend toward reduction in TCD8 naive cells, along with an increased percentage of TCD8 Mem Efect T cells after starting ECP in responding patients. None of the studied serum cytokines displayed statistically significant changes in either acute or chronic SRes-GVHD. ECP is an effective treatment for patients with SRes-GVHD. Biomarkers could help guide decision-making on ECP treatment initiation and duration.

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has proven effectiveness for treatment of several diseases, including acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogenic transplantation of hematopoietic blood stem cells. The standard ECP requires leukapheresis to obtain a mononuclear cell fraction. The possibility of using leukapheresis is limited by the requirements for vascular access and the somatic status of the patient. There is a relatively new method of performing ECF, called «mini-photopheresis» (mini-ECF), in which a fraction of mononuclear cells is isolated from a dose of whole blood obtained by the exfusion method. The article presents preliminary results of using mini-ECP in patients with acute and chronic GVHD. Materials and methods of research: the study included 11 patients with acute (7 patients) and chronic (4 patients) GVHD who received mini-ECP therapy from June 2018 to January 2021. Leukocyte fractions rich in mononuclear cells were prepared from the dose of whole blood of patients. The resulting fraction was diluted with 0,9% NaCl solution to less than 3% hematocrit. The cellular product was then injected with an 8-Methoxyperalene and programmed with UV spectrum A. Autologous erythrocytes and the finished cellular product were injected into the patient after irradiation. Results: 6 out of 7 patients (85,7%) with acute GVHD has responded to mini-ECP therapy. In patients with chronic GVHD, the response rate to mini-ECP therapy was 25%. In both groups there are no significant differences found in the number of leukocytes count per body mass in the finished cellular product. The correlation between the presence and severity of response to mini-ECP therapy with the number of leukocytes in the finished cellular product was not determined. None of the patients had adverse reactions and complications associated with mini-ECP therapy. Conclusion: mini-ECP is an attractive alternative for treatment of patients with steroid-resistant or steroid-dependent GVHD who cannot undergo leukapheresis. Our results are preliminary, but promising. We will continue to use this method as a second-line therapy for patients with contraindications to leukapheresis.

Background This study was designed to prospectively evaluate the efficacy of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) to attenuate the rate of decline of FEV1 in lung transplant recipients with refractory bronchiolitis obliterans. Due to an observed higher than expected early mortality, a preliminary analysis was performed. Study Design and Methods Subjects from 10 lung transplant centres were assigned to ECP treatment or to observation based on spirometric criteria, with potential crossover for those under observation. The primary endpoint of this study was to assess response to ECP (i.e., greater than a 50% decrease in the rate of FEV1 decline) before and 6 months after initiation of ECP. Mortality was also evaluated 6 and 12 months after enrolment as a secondary endpoint. Results Of 44 enrolled subjects, 31 were assigned to ECP treatment while 13 were initially assigned to observation on a non‐random basis using specific spirometric inclusion criteria (seven of the observation patients subsequently crossed over to receive ECP). Of evaluable patients, 95% of patients initially assigned to treatment responded to ECP with rates of FEV1 decline that were reduced by 93% in evaluable ECP‐treated patients. Mortality rates (percentages) at 6 and 12 months after enrolment was 32% and 41%, respectively. The most common (92%) primary cause of death was respiratory or graft failure. Significantly (p = 0.002) higher rates of FEV1 decline were observed in the non‐survivors (−212 ± 177 ml/month) when compared to the survivors (−95 ± 117 ml/month) 12 months after enrolment. In addition, 18 patients with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) diagnosis within 6 months of enrolment had lost 38% of their baseline lung function at BOS diagnosis and 50% of their lung function at enrolment. Conclusions These analyses suggest that earlier detection and treatment of BOS should be considered to appreciate improved outcomes with ECP.

Background This study assessed pharmacoeconomic costs associated with extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) compared with other available second‐line therapies for chronic graft‐vs‐host disease (cGvHD) in a tertiary Spanish institution. Methods Patients (≥18 years) diagnosed with steroid‐refractory cGvHD were eligible. Data were collected retrospectively from index date until 1 year or relapse. Patients were distributed in two cohorts (ECP vs non‐ECP), matched by age (≤ or > 40), hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HLA‐identical sibling donor or other) and number of previous immunosuppressive lines (1, 2, or ≥ 3). Costs were assigned using the 2016 diagnosis‐related group (DRG) system: DRG 579 (€22 383) overnight stay due to major complication (ie, sepsis, pneumonia, parenteral nutrition, or respiratory failure), and DRG 875 (€5154) if no major complication. The primary endpoint was healthcare resource utilization per patient. Results Forty patients (n = 20 per cohort) were included. Median age was 49, and 37.5% were female. Mean total cost per patient was €25 319 (95% CI: €17 049–€33 590) across the two cohorts, with a slightly lower mean cost per ECP‐treated patient (€23 120) compared with the non‐ECP cohort (€27 519; P = .597). Twenty‐seven inpatient hospitalizations occurred among ECP‐treated patients, vs 33 in the non‐ECP cohort. Day hospital and external consultations were more frequent in the ECP cohort. However, fewer inpatient admissions included DRG 579 compared with the non‐ECP cohort (44% vs 58%). Inpatient length of stay was slightly shorter in the ECP cohort (30 vs 49 days; P = .298). Conclusions ECP treatment may yield economic savings in Spain through resource savings and moving costs toward outpatient care.

Aim: To compare secondary systemic treatment (SST) continuation and associated resource use and costs in chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) patients in the USA. Materials & methods: This was a retrospective study using Truven Health MarketScan database (2009–2016). cGvHD patients were classified as continuers or discontinuers if treated with SST for ≥180 days without or with a treatment gap (≥45 days), respectively. Results: Among 464 cGvHD patients with SST, mTOR inhibitors, extracorporeal photopheresis and imatinib were most frequently used. A total of 172 patients were SST continuers and 292 were discontinuers. Extracorporeal photopheresis treated patients were the highest continuers, followed by imatinib and mTOR inhibitors. SST continuers had lower monthly hospitalization costs versus discontinuers. Conclusion: This real-world analysis demonstrates high SST continuation rates in cGvHD patients are associated with lower resource utilization and cost.

Patients with malignant thymomas are susceptible to the development of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)–like disease known as thymoma-associated multiorgan autoimmunity (TAMA). The proposed mechanism of this paraneoplastic phenomenon is a breakdown in the immune regulatory function of the thymus and subsequent activation of T cells. Here, we report a novel case of a patient with TAMA who, following surgical resection and radiation therapy, successfully underwent treatment with a combination of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), cyclosporine, and prednisone.

Steroids remain the initial therapy for acute graft-vs.-host disease (AGVHD). Strategies to improve response and minimize steroid exposure are needed. We report results of a randomized, adaptive, Bayesian-designed, phase II trial of prednisone with or without extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) as an initial therapy for patients with newly diagnosed AGVHD. The primary endpoint was success at day 56 defined as: alive, in remission, achieving AGVHD response without additional therapy, and on

The results of complex treatment with the programmed procedures of extracorporeal photopheresis and methotrexate in patients with psoriatic arthritis for 12 months are presented. It has been established that program extracorporeal photopheresis in combination with basic therapy with methotrexate in patients with psoriatic arthritis have a significant effect on the relief of articular syndrome (reduction of morning stiffness, pain intensity, joint swelling). It was revealed that the inclusion of programmed extracorporeal photopheresis and methotrexate in the complex treatment of psoriatic arthritis reduces the level of circulating low molecular weight, medium molecular weight and high molecular weight immune complexes and in most cases leads to clinical and immunological remission. This is confirmed by a decrease in complaints of the severity of articular syndrome and a decrease in the clinical and laboratory activity of the disease (a significant decrease in the level of C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate). A scheme has been developed for the programmed use of extracorporeal photopheresis procedures in the complex treatment of psoriatic arthritis, which consists of 2 procedures every other day with an interval of 2,5-3 months for 12 months. Combined therapy with the programmed application of extracorporeal photopheresis procedures and methotrexate prolongs the period of disease remission and can be recommended for patients with psoriatic arthritis with high activity, insufficient effect of basic therapy and intolerance to higher doses of immunosuppressive drugs.

BACKGROUND Sezary syndrome is a leukaemic variant of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma with poor prognosis. With the exception of stem cell transplantation, current treatments for SS are not curative. Rather, they aim at reducing disease burden and improving quality of life. Yet, pruritus - the major cause for impaired quality of life in these patients - is notoriously difficult to treat. Thus, supportive treatments addressing agonizing pruritus are urgently needed. OBJECTIVES To explore the clinical and immunological effects of type 2 cytokine blockade with dupilumab as supportive treatment in Sezary syndrome. METHODS A Sezary syndrome patient with stable disease but intractable pruritus was treated with dupilumab in combination with continued extracorporeal photopheresis. Close clinical and immunological monitoring on blood and skin samples from the patient was performed over 44 weeks. In vitro assays with patient's lymphoma cells were performed to address effects of dupilumab on Sezary cell's response to Th2 cytokines. RESULTS Clinically, dupilumab treatment induced rapid and sustained reduction in itch and improvement of skin and lymph node involvement. In both blood and skin, a reduction in Th2 bias was observed. Intriguingly, lymphocyte counts and Sezary cells in blood increased and later stabilized under dupilumab treatment. In vitro, dupilumab abrogated the anti-apoptotic and activating effects of Th2 cytokines on Sezary cells. CONCLUSIONS In this Sezary patient, inhibition of IL-4 and IL-13 signalling was associated with striking clinical benefit in terms of quality of life, pruritus and use of topical corticosteroids. While safety remains an important concern, our data support the future exploration of Th2 modulation for supportive care in Sezary Syndrome.

Glucocorticoid-refractory (SR) chronic (c) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a multisystem immunological disease and the leading cause of non-relapse mortality (NRM) in patients surviving longer than 2 years after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Both ruxolitinib (RUX) and extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) have shown activity for SR-cGVHD which motivated us to treat refractory cGHVD patients with the RUX-ECP combination. In this retrospective survey, 23 patients received RUX-ECP as salvage therapy for SR-cGVHD. The best response (CR or PR) at any time point during treatment was 74% (17/23) including 9% (2/23) CR and 65% (15/23) PR. The 24-months-survival was 75% (CI 56.0-94.1). Newly diagnosed cytopenia occurred in 22% (5/23) and CMV reactivation was observed in 26% (6/23) of the patients. Serum levels of soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) correlated with response. Our retrospective analysis shows that the RUX-ECP combination is safe and has activity in a fraction of patients with SR-cGVHD, which needs validation in a prospective trial.

Despite the use of up-to-date immunosuppressive agents, graft rejection episodes are quite common and pose a serious threat to thousands of solid organ recipients. Continuous use of various combinations of immunosuppressants cause serious complications, such as arterial hypertension, post-transplant diabetes mellitus, renal failure, increased risk of infections, malignant neoplasms, etc. The attempts to achieve the desired or forced minimization of the graft immunosuppression are associated with the threat of its rejection, which makes it necessary to search for less toxic, non-medical, immunological, including cellular, management methods. One of the promising methods based on cell technology is extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP). ECP is a well-established second line therapy recommended for the prevention and treatment of refractory rejection of a heart transplant. ECP improves the pulmonary allograft functioning in patients with treatment resistant obliterating bronchiolitis syndrome. However, its value as a preventive method has not yet been established. ECP effectiveness for induction, maintenance, or anti-crisis therapy in transplantation of kidney, liver or other solid organs has been rather convincing, but the lack of randomized multicenter studies limits its use. The optimal ECP strategy has not been yet established. Nevertheless, current understanding of the pathophysiological and immunological aspects of ECP is sufficient to develop a standard methodology and technology for the procedure, as well as for a quality control system for ECP in kidney and liver transplant recipients. The review discusses possible mechanisms of the immunomodulating effect of ECP. ECP is being increasingly studied in prospective randomized trials with larger samples. This allows for an extension of its clinical indications with clear criteria, as well as for studying its multifactorial underlying immunomodulating mechanism of action. Further research is needed to identify biomarkers that could predict ECP effectiveness in solid organ transplantation.

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) procedure is based on mononuclear cells (MNC) apheresis and their extracorporeal UVA exposure. It has been applied mainly in hematology and transplantation. Over thirty years of experience confirmed its effectiveness, outstanding safety profile and good tolerance. These observations encourage the implementation of ECP in the treatment of autoimmune connective tissue diseases. The procedure might be considered in refractory cases, when the first line treatment strategies do not control disease activity or immunosuppressants are contraindicated and in the group of patients with high risk of infections. Current literature about using ECP in rheumatology is scarce and most data come from case reports and small observational studies. Systemic sclerosis is the most studied rheumatic disease in the field of ECP use. The disease appeared on the list of clinical applications of ECP therapy according to American Society for Apheresis. However, no European or American guidelines, or recommendations for the treatment in rheumatology suggest ECP as the treatment option. There are no standards in performing ECP in rheumatic diseases concerning indications, length of therapy, concomitant immunosuppressive treatment, follow up or patients characteristic. In this review, we have searched literature concerning ECP use in rheumatic diseases.

Chronic Graft versus Host Disease (cGvHD) is an important cause of late non-relapse morbidity and mortality following allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) [1]. The incidence...

Rationale : Most people infected with SARS-CoV-2 have asymptomatic or minor clinical manifestations and recover without any aggressive therapy. However, there are patient categories in need of specific treatment and those at high risk of severe disease. Control of viremia with antiviral therapy may not be the best therapeutic strategy, since, in addition to substantial toxicity, antiviral agents can suppress the production of antiviral antibodies and disintegrate adoptive immunity against SARS-CoV-2. Due to a high correlation between the symptoms severity in patients with COVID-19 and inflammation, anti-inflammatory corticosteroids have been proposed to treat the disease. However, clinical data do not support the systemic administration of corticosteroids for the treatment of patients with severe COVID-19. Such treatment may have a negative effect due to suppression of the adoptive immune system. In this regard, the development or use of already available of agents that modulate inflammation without compromising the adoptive immune response could be the most effective therapeutic strategy. Aim: To evaluate clinical efficacy and safety of the cell biotherapy technique, the extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), in the treatment of patients with moderately severe new coronavirus disease COVID-19. Materials and methods : The study included four patients (three women and one man, age 42 to 60 years), with SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by gene amplification. All patients had CT-confirmed bilateral multisegmental viral pneumonia (grades > 2, i.e. with 25 to 60% involvement of the lungs). Prior to admission, all patients received antibiotics (azithromycin 500 mg daily and levo-floxacin / amoxicillin clavulanate 500 mg BID) and antipyretics for torpid fever of up to 38.5-39 °C. The outpatient treatment lasted for 8 to 14 days, with signs of progressive respiratory failure. In addition to the moderately severe and torpid course of viral pneumonia, three patients showed hematology test abnormalities, such as hypochromic anemia, leukopenia, leukopenia/lymphopenia, and moderate thrombocytopenia. Three patients had high C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. Inpatient treatment consisted of azithromycin 500 mg daily, levofloxacin 500 mg BID, hydroxychloroquine 200 mg BID, and low molecular weight heparin (enoxaparin 0.4 ml, 4000 anti-Xa IU, s.c. BID). Despite the treatment, the patients showed signs of progressive respiratory failure, with increasing dyspnea and gradual decrease in saturation from 96% to 92%. Isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells was done in an intermittent blood separator "Haemonetics MCS+” (USA), with subsequent cell irradiation with an extracorporeal blood irradiator (OKUFKE 320/400-600/650-01 "Yulia”, ZAO NPKF "METOM”, Russia). Ammifurin (ZAO "Pharmcenter VILAR”, Russia) was used as a photosensitizer. Three patients had two ECP sessions with an interval of 24 hours, and one patient had one ECP session. Results: In three patients who had received two ECP sessions, there was a regression of radiographic signs of viral pneumonia from CT2 to CT1 (less than 25% of lung tissue involvement) during the next four days (96 hours). In one patient, the follow-up CT showed resolving pneumonia with less than 5% involvement of the lungs. The patients (n = 3) with baseline high CRP levels showed their normalization at 4 days after two ECP sessions. At 24 hours after a single ECP session, leukocyte count and differential, as well as platelets were restored. In three patients, viral RNA tests within 2 to 4 days after ECP were negative. These results were associated with normalization of body temperature, no further progression of respiratory failure, and a reduction in hospital stay. Conclusion: The use of ECP in 4 patients with moderately severe SARS-CoV-2 infection has contributed to the rapid relief of clinical symptoms, resolution of the inflammation and restoration of respiratory abnormalities in all of them. These observations allow us to consider ECP as an effective and safe method of treatment for moderately severe COVID-19 and a promising adjuvant method in the high-risk patients in order to prevent an unfavorable disease outcome.

Case presentation A 71-year-old man was admitted to our hospital because of diffuse chest pain and a mass on routine chest radiography. He did not report cough, dyspnea, fever, night sweats, or weight loss. His medical history was remarkable for chronic lymphocytic leukemia diagnosed 13 years before presentation, and secondary myelodysplastic syndrome diagnosed 2 years before the onset of the current symptoms. As a curative approach, he had received a matched unrelated stem cell transplantation 16 months earlier, and he had been in complete remission since. He developed chronic graft-vs-host disease, presenting mainly as oral ulceration (grade 1, according to National Institute of Health consensus criteria), which had been treated with oral cyclosporine and extracorporeal photopheresis. The immunosuppression had been tapered 6 months before presentation. Routine medication included co-trimoxazole prophylaxis twice per week. He had no known allergies, and he denied recent travels and sick contacts.

Background Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is an immunomodulatory cellular therapy which has been shown to induce a tolerogenic state in patients with acute and chronic graft-vs-host disease. ECOG-ACRIN explored the activity of ECP as a part of a reduced intensity conditioning regimen in two multicenter trials in patients with MDS (E1902) and lymphomas (E1402). While both studies closed before completing accrual, we report results in 23 patients (17 MDS and 6 lymphoma). Study design and methods Patients received 2 days of ECP followed by pentostatin 4 mg/m2 /day for two consecutive days, followed by 600 cGy of total body irradiation prior to stem cell infusion. Immunosuppression for aGVHD was infusional cyclosporine A or tacrolimus and methotrexate on day +1, +3, with mycophenolate mofetil starting on day 100 for chronic GVHD prophylaxis. Results All patients engrafted, with median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment of 15-18 days and 10-18 days respectively. Grade 3 or 4 aGVHD occurred in 13% and chronic extensive GVHD in 30%. Conclusions These studies demonstrate that ECP/pentostatin/TBI is well tolerated and associated with adequate engraftment of neutrophils and platelets in patients with lymphomas and MDS.

Background A new protocol has been developed on the Amicus Separator that enables the device to perform online extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) procedures when used in conjunction with the Phelix photoactivation device and associated disposable kit. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and performance of the Amicus ECP System in adult subjects with steroid‐refractory or dependent chronic graft vs host disease (cGVHD). Study Design and Methods Eight subjects with mild to severe cGVHD underwent 31 procedures. Subject safety evaluations were performed pre and post procedure and adverse events (AEs) were recorded during treatment and 24 hours after the last procedure. In vitro evaluations of the treated cells included hematology counts and lymphocyte apoptosis, viability and proliferation as measures for ECP procedure validation. Results For n = 23 evaluable procedures, median (range) procedure time was 88 (78‐110) minutes, during which 2.9 (0.6‐4.7) × 109 TNCs (approximately 90% MNCs) were treated and reinfused to the subjects. All subject safety evaluations (vitals, cell counts, plasma hemoglobin and bacterial and endotoxin testing) were within expected ranges. All device or procedure related AEs were mild in nature. After 24 hours in culture, 86 (52‐98)% of treated lymphocytes were apoptotic compared to 27 (15‐51)% in controls. Inhibition of lymphocyte proliferation was >91% in all procedures. Conclusion ECP procedures were safely completed in adult subjects with SR‐cGVHD treated using the new online Amicus ECP system.

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is a second-line therapy in acute and chronic GVHD and solid organ transplant rejection. We report ECP use in 98 pediatric patients in seven UK centers from 2010 to 2017, the majority treated for aGVHD (73.5%). ECP was safe and well tolerated including in low body weight patients. Most patients were on multiple immunosuppressive therapies prior to ECP; 45.9% were able to reduce or stop immunosuppression with treatment. Complete or partial response was reported in almost 60%. This study supports the need to include ECP treatment data to national transplant databases to provide accurate information regarding service provision, patient outcomes, and safety.

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is an established treatment strategy in steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). This study's main objective was to analyze the clinical response and impact of ECP therapy in steroid dose reduction. A retrospective observational series of 113 patients from 7 transplantation centers was analyzed. Sixty-five patients (58%) had acute GVHD (aGVHD), and 48 (42%) had chronic GVHD (cGVHD). All ECP procedures were performed with the off-line system. The median number of procedures until achievement of initial response was 3 for both patients with aGVHD and those with cGVHD. ECP was the second-line therapy in 48% of the aGVHD cases and in 50% of the cGVHD cases. 71% of the cases of aGVHD were grade III-IV, and 69% of the cases of cGVHD were severe. The overall response rate on day 28 was 53% (complete response [CR] rate, 45%) in the patients with aGVHD and 67% (CR, 23%) in those with cGVHD. Skin was the most frequently involved organ, with a response rate of 58% (CR, 49%) in the patients with aGVHD and 69% (CR 29%) in those with cGVHD. At the end of ECP treatment, 60% of patients treated for aGVHD who responded were able to stop steroid therapy, with a median dose reduction of 100%. Significant differences in overall survival were observed for patients responding to ECP with aGVHD (hazard ratio [HR], 4.3; P.001) and with cGVHD (HR, 4.8; P = .003). Our data indicate that ECP is a valid therapeutic alternative in patients with steroid-refractory aGVHD and cGVHD, permitting significant steroid dosage reductions.

Background Two extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) instruments, the CELLEX and the UVARXTS are currently being used "off-label" in the US for treatment of graft versus host disease (GVHD). Our study compared the performance of the two instruments in the setting of acute and chronic GVHD. Study design and methods We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of patients with steroid refractory or steroid resistant GVHD undergoing ECP at Barnes Jewish Hospital. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the comparative efficacy of the two instruments with respect to steroid dose reduction (≥50% from baseline) and clinical improvement in GVHD. Chi-square/Fisher exact tests were used to compare the incidence of adverse events, while multivariate Cox regression was employed to assess a potential difference in mortality between the two instrument treatment cohorts. Results After adjusting for potential confounders, there was no significant difference in the odds of steroid dose reduction (OR = 1.41, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.51-3.90, p = 0.50) or clinical improvement (OR 2.0, 95% CI: 0.63-6.41, p = 0.24) between the two instrument treatment cohorts. The frequency of adverse events (CELLEX 45.4%; UVAR XTS 40.5%, p = 0.55) was also comparable between the cohorts. There was no significant difference in mortality of either acute or chronic GVHD patients when treated by the CELLEX as compared to the UVAR-XTS (aHR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.35-1.25, p = 0.20). Conclusion The efficacy and safety of the two ECP instruments, the CELLEX and the UVAR-XTS, are comparable for the treatment of acute and chronic GVHD.

Introduction: The diagnosis and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) after lung transplantation has recently gained recognition within the transplant community. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), currently used to treat chronic lung allograft dysfunction, modulates various pathways of the immune system known to be involved in AMR. We hypothesize that adding ECP to established AMR treatments could prevent the rebound of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Objectives: This study aimed to analyze the role of ECP as an add-on therapy to prevent the rebound of DSA. Methods: Lung transplant recipients who received ECP as an add-on therapy for pulmonary AMR between January 2010 and January 2019 were included in this single-center retrospective analysis. Baseline demographics of the patients, as well as their immunological characteristics and long-term transplant outcomes, were analyzed. Results: A total of 41 patients developed clinical AMR during the study period. Sixteen patients received ECP as an add-on therapy after first-line AMR treatment. Among the 16 patients, 2 (13%) had pretransplant DSA, both against human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I (B38, B13, and C06). Fifteen patients (94%) developed de novo DSA (dnDSA), i.e., 10 (63%) against class I and 14 (88%) against class II. The median time to dnDSA after lung transplantation was 361 days (range 25–2,548). According to the most recent International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) consensus report, 2 (13%) patients had definite clinical AMR, 6 (38%) had probable AMR, and 7 (44%) had possible AMR. The median mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of dnDSA at the time of clinical diagnosis was 4,220 (range 1,319–10,552) for anti-HLA class I and 10,953 (range 1,969–27,501) for anti-HLA class II antibodies. ECP was performed for a median of 14 cycles (range 1–64). MFI values of dnDSA against HLA classes I and II were significantly reduced over the treatment period (for anti-class I: 752; range 70–2,066; for anti-class II: 5,612; range 1,689–21,858). The 1-year survival rate was 55%. No adverse events related to ECP were reported in any of the patients. Conclusions: ECP is associated with a reduction of dnDSA in lung transplant recipients affected by AMR. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm the beneficial effects of ECP in the setting of AMR.

BACKGROUND The off-line extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) procedure requires photosensitization in an external cell therapy laboratory as per the French regulatory requirement. This regulation results in higher time and costs compared with the on-line alternative performed entirely at the patient's bedside. Recently, full in situ execution of the off-line procedure has been implemented in the Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital Hemobiotherapy Department (Paris, France). This report summarizes the center's experience regarding the organizational and costs impacts of this change compared with the on-line procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS ECP was broken down into stages, and several procedures were monitored prospectively in real-life settings. The total costs associated with both procedures were the sum of the fixed costs and variable costs related to all stages of the procedures, nursing-time costs, property costs, and patient-related production loss costs. RESULTS Eight off-line ECP and fourteen on-line ECP procedures were monitored during five consecutive days. Procedure duration was not different (median 137.5 vs 154.0 minutes, P = .29). Times and costs associated with nursing were higher but offset by lower fixed costs of the off-line ECP. Total direct costs per procedure associated with using the off-line ECP were significantly lower than those of the on-line procedure (459.6 ± 7.1 EUR vs 953.8 ± 6.5 EUR; P = .0002). Similar results were observed when including the costs of patient production loss. CONCLUSIONS As a competitive time procedure, the in situ off-line method proved to be cost-efficient by effectively offering similar patient treatment per year compared with the on-line procedure.

Introduction: Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a serious complication in allogeneic transplantation. The first-line treatment is high doses of corticosteroids. In the absence of response to corticosteroids, several immunosuppressive drugs can be used, but they entail an elevated risk of severe infections. Added to this, there are patients who do not improve on any immunosuppressive treatment, with subsequent deteriorated quality of life and high mortality. Ruxolitinib has been shown to induce responses in refractory patients. In this study we have presented our real-life experience. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients with severe GVHD refractory to corticosteroids. Demographic, previous treatment, response and mortality data were collected. Results: Since 2014, seventeen patients with GVHD were treated with ruxolitinib due to refractoriness to corticosteroids and immunosuppressants and a few to extracorporeal photopheresis, 8 with acute GVHD (1 pulmonary, 4 cutaneous grade IV and 3 digestive grade IV) and 9 with chronic GHVD (5 cutaneous sclerodermiform, 2 pulmonary and 1 multisystemic). The overall response to ruxolitinib treatment for acute GVHD was 80%, 40% with partial response and 40% with complete remission. Global response in chronic GVHD was 79%. The GVHD mortality was only seen in acute disease and was 40%. Causes of mortality in those patients were severe viral pneumonia, post-transplantation hemophagocytic syndrome and meningeal GVHD refractory to ruxolitinib. Conclusions: In our series, the use of ruxolitinib as a rescue strategy in acute or chronic GVHD was satisfactory. Ruxolitinib treatment in patients with a very poor prognosis showed encouraging results. However, the GVHD mortality remains high in refractory patients, showing that better therapeutic strategies are needed.

International audience; We reported 3 kidney transplant patients with PTLD who developed mixed AR following IS treatment minimization. AR episodes were treated with extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), methylprednisolone and IVIG. In all patients, graft function improved under ECP and stabilized in the long term. These observations suggest that ECP is safe and efficient for treatment of AR in the context of PTLD.

Background and objectives Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is one of the second-line treatment strategies in steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD). We aimed to share our multicenter experience using ECP in our steroid-refractory aGvHD patients. Materials and methods A retrospective observational series of 75 aGvHD patients from 4 transplant centers were analyzed. All ECP procedures were performed with the off-line system. All patients received ECP as second-line therapy. Results 74.7 % of aGvHD patients were grade 3 or 4. The overall response rate was 42.7 % (32/75) in aGvHD including 17 complete responses (22.7 %). Median follow-up was 6 months (range, 1–68). Median overall survival (OS) was 5 months for non-responders and 68 months for responders (p Conclusions Early initiated ECP could be an effective treatment alternative in patients with steroid-refractory aGvHD.

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is a treatment strategy in steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD). In this study, we aimed to share our multicenter experience using ECP in our steroid-refractory cGvHD patients.In this multicenter observational retrospective study with the participation of four Turkish transplant centers, 100 patients with the diagnosis of steroid-refractory cGvHD who underwent ECP were analyzed. All ECP procedures were performed with the off-line system.Severe cGvHD was observed in 77 % of the patients. 50 % of the patients had more than 1 organ involvement. The overall response rate in cGvHD was 58 %, and the complete response (CR) rate was 35 %. The skin was the most involved organ, with a response rate of 61.2 % (CR rate 30.6 %) in cGvHD. At a median 13 months (1-261) follow-up, overall survival (OS) was 41 % (n = 41) and the mortality rate was 59 % (n = 59). Median overall survival (OS) was 2 months for non-responders and 91 months for responders (p0.001). Significant OS differences were observed for patients responding to ECP in cGvHD (HR = 4.1, p = 0.001) patients.ECP is a good therapeutic alternative and could be used earlier in patients with steroid-resistant cGvHD.

Chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) remains a major complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). It significantly decreases survival and quality of life. The present study demonstrates retrospective data on extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) in children with cGVHD. A total of 42 children with steroid-refractory cGVHD were enrolled in the study. The majority of patients had acute leukemia (n = 32, 76%). All patients received ECP as second (n = 18, 43%) or third (n = 24, 57%) line of therapy. Initial ECP schedule consisted of bimonthly regimen for two consecutive days with possibility of further tapering according to response. Any concurrent treatment administered before ECP could be continued if considered necessary. Complete response to ECP was registered in seven (17%) patients and partial response in 24 (57%). Overall response according to organ involvement was as follows: skin (n = 24, 75%), mucous membranes (n = 16, 73%), liver (n = 8, 80%), gut (n = 4, 80%), lungs (n = 2, 22%) and joints (n = 2, 67%). Five-year overall, progression-free and failure-free survival was 57%, 56% and 30%, respectively. Non-relapse mortality at 5 years was 14%. We didn’t observe any clinically significant complications in children that could be attributed to the procedure. ECP remains important and safe treatment option in children with cGVHD.

Simple Summary The most common cause of late allograft failure is chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), but no effective therapy is available. Different immunosuppressive drugs in combination with procedures that remove serum antibodies have been used and the results have not shown to improve graft and patient outcome, but only an increased risk of adverse events. Extracorporeal pho-topheresis (ECP) is leukapheresis-based immunomodulatory therapy not associated with adverse effect, in which lymphocytes treat-ed with 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) are irradiated with ultraviolet-A (UVA) ex vivo and re-infused into the patient. In this study we investigated therapeutic long-term effect of ECP in patients with biopsy proved chronic ABMR. Abstract Objective: Chronic renal antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is a common cause of allograft failure, but an effective therapy is not available. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has been proven successful in chronic lung and heart rejection, and graft versus host disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of ECP in chronic ABMR patients. Patients and Methods: We investigated ECP treatment in 14 patients with biopsy-proven chronic ABMR and stage 2–3 chronic renal failure. The primary aim was to e valuate the eGFR lowering after 1 year of ECP therapy. The ECP responders (R) showed eGFR reduction greater than 20% vs the basal levels. We also evaluated the effectiveness of ECP on proteinuria, anti-HLA antibodies (HLAab), interleukin 6 (IL-6) serum levels, and CD3, CD4, CD8, CD19, NK, Treg and T helper 17 (Th17) circulating cells. Results: Three patients dropped out of the study. The R patients were eight (72.7%) out of the 11 remaining patients. Because ECP was not associated with any adverse reaction, the R patients continued such treatment for up to 3 years, showing a persisting eGFR stabilization. Twenty four hour proteinuria did not increase in the R patients over the follow-up when compared to the non-responder patients (NR). In the R patients, the HLAab levels were reduced and completely cleared in six out of eight patients when compared with the NR patients. The NR HLAab levels also increased after the discontinuation of the ECP. The ECP in the R patients showed a decrease in CD3, CD4, CD8, CD19, and NK circulating cells. The ECP treatment in the R patients also induced Tregs and Th17 cell increases, and a decrease of the IL-6 serum levels. Conclusions: ECP abates the HLAab titer and renal failure progression in patients with chronic renal ABMR, modulating the immune cellular and humoral responses.

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that is characterized by well-demarcated erythematous plaques with a silver scale. Although many new and emerging therapeutic agents are often sufficient to control the disease, there is still a need for alternative treatment options in challenging cases. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has been applied to many T-cell-mediated diseases to restore immune homeostasis and treat psoriasis effectively. In this paper, we present a psoriasis patient who did not respond to methotrexate, narrowband ultraviolet B, or acitretin. Because of a diagnosis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, the patient had contraindications for cyclosporine, fumaric acid esters, and biologics but achieved remission with a total of 12 sessions of ECP in two and a half months. Although exacerbation was recorded after polymerase chain reaction (PCR) confirmed coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) disease infection at the end of the first month, scores from the psoriasis area severity index (PASI) and dermatological life quality index (DLQI) were regressed significantly within two and a half months. ECP seems to provide an effective and rapid response for psoriasis and should be considered for psoriasis patients who fail to respond or have contraindications to existing treatments.

Extra-corporeal photopheresis (ECP) is known as safe ultimate treatment option for chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Here, we report the first case of ECP as "second-line" immunomodulatory therapy early post-transplant in an adult patient undergoing lung transplantation for severe chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, complicated by impaired consciousness due to idiopathic hyperammonemia resulting in recurrent hypercapnic respiratory failure. ECP was initiated twice weekly on post-transplant day 25 and standard triple immunosuppression reduced. Within 2 weeks, the clinical status improved. ECP has been continued every 4 weeks after discharge. At 1 year post-transplant, ECP was stopped as maintenance immunosuppression was reached. We recommend to consider the immunomodulatory effect of ECP as "second line" immunomodulatory therapy in cases where standard immunosuppression causes severe collateral damage. ECP is able to assist prevention of allograft rejection in conjunction with reduced levels of standard immunosuppression, even in the early period following lung transplantation.

Extracorporeal Photopheresis for Autoimmune Colitis Extracorporeal photopheresis has been an effective treatment for graft-versus-host disease. In this case, it was used to treat a patient with sev...

Background Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) therapy has proved to be an effective and safe treatment for graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD), an important complication after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In 2016, we acquired Therakos CellEx, a dedicated inline ECP device to accomplish a significant increase in ECP activity. In literature, we found few data reporting CellEx performance evaluated in terms of collection efficiency to qualify the device. Hence, we decided to collect and analyze our data in order to build a reference in terms of expected results of the procedure. Here we report our data of ECP performed using CellEx in a 12-month period focusing on collection efficiency assessment, as well as procedural and apheretic product characteristics. Study design and methods We collected data of patients undergoing ECP from April 2018 to March 2019 using CellEx in order to evaluate collection efficiency. Results Between April 2018 and March 2019 we treated 28 adult patients affected by GvHD performing 319 ECP using CellEx. CellEx mononuclear cell product was characterized by high mononuclear cell percentage and low percentage of granulocytes, resulting particularly suitable for ECP treatments. Median collection efficiency for total nucleated cells and for mononuclear cells was 31.2% and 62.3%, respectively. Conclusion Collection efficiency of CellEx was comparable to that usually obtained by cell separators designed for cell collection and was comparable to that of offline systems. Our results provide a detailed performance evaluation for inline ECP system users.

Background Patients requiring chronic apheresis treatments typically lack sufficient peripheral venous access to support long-term therapy. Historically, central venous tunneled catheters, septum-bearing subcutaneous ports, and fistulas were used to obtain required blood flow rates for apheresis procedures. In 2017, the US Food and Drug Administration approved the first intravascular device specifically designed for apheresis therapy, the PowerFlow Implantable Apheresis IV Port. Methods Several preimplementation meetings with key hospital stakeholders were held to determine the most efficient and safest strategy for integrating the PowerFlow device into our practice. Interventional radiologists implanted the apheresis port in patients meeting specified criteria. Performance metrics and adverse events were evaluated over a 2-year period, July 2017 through June 2019. Results Eighteen patients underwent apheresis therapy using the PowerFlow port. The most common apheresis therapy provided was extracorporeal photopheresis, followed by therapeutic plasma exchange and low-density lipoprotein apheresis. Flow rates up to 90 mL/min were obtained; the rates were limited by patient tolerance for the apheresis procedure. Complications included infection, obstruction due to fibroblastic sleeve, and migration of the vascular device. The estimated risk of PowerFlow-associated bloodstream infection in the study population was 0.18 per 1000 intravascular device days. Conclusion The PowerFlow Implantable Apheresis IV Port can achieve flow rates necessary for all apheresis therapies and is a promising alternative vascular access device for patients undergoing apheresis.

BACKGROUND Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is associated with few adverse effects. We have anecdotally noted patients treated with long-term ECP develop iron deficiency anemia (IDA). METHODS We performed a retrospective chart review of adult patients who received ECP for any indication at Mayo Clinic Rochester and Mayo Clinic Arizona. The primary objective was to describe the cumulative incidence of IDA at 1 year of ECP therapy. RESULTS A total of 123 patients were eligible for analysis. Graft-vs-host disease was the most common indication for ECP (n = 76, 61.8%). At 1 year of ECP therapy, the cumulative incidence of IDA was 24.1% (95% CI, 14.2%-32.9%). At 5 years, the cumulative incidence of IDA was 68.3% (95% CI, 38%-83.8%). Risk factors for the development of IDA included: cumulative number of ECP sessions (HR 1.34, 95% CI, 1.05-1.73 per 10 additional sessions, P = .022), an indication for ECP of solid organ transplant rejection (compared to cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, HR 5.46, 95% CI, 2.06-14.49, P

Background: Scleroderma is a heterogeneous group of diseases that can be localized or systemic. Localized scleroderma is a fibrosis of the skin characterized by inflammation and thickening due to excessive collagen deposition, and systemic sclerosis (SSc) is characterized by vasculopathy, immune dysregulation and skin fibrosis. In general, the prognosis of scleroderma highly depends on the degree of visceral involvement and relates to the degree of skin fibrosis. Despite the numerous therapies used for patients with scleroderma, the disease-related morbidity and mortality are high. Studies have explored the effects of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) in scleroderma treatment. Originally used in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, ECP is an immunomodulatory procedure in which a patient’s white blood cells are treated with 8-methoxypsoralen and exposed to UVA radiation to inhibit cell proliferation and induce immunosuppression. Summary: Multiple lines of evidence suggest that ECP may be a safe and possibly effective therapy for patients with scleroderma, specifically demonstrating improvement in patients with cutaneous manifestations of the disease. However, future studies assessing its role in managing visceral involvement are needed. Our review aims to examine and consolidate the results of clinical studies and propose a possible role for ECP in the management of scleroderma. Key Points: ECP may be an effective and safe procedure for the treatment of SSc.

Graft versus host disease (GvHD) is a serious and common complication of allogenic haematopoietic stem cell transplant. Corticosteroids are considered the standard care for initial treatment of GvHD but a significant proportion of patients will need long-term steroid treatment for control of GvHD. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is a cell-based immunomodulatory therapy that is an accepted second line treatment in patients with steroid refractory, dependent or intolerant GvHD and has shown efficacy in allowing steroid dose reduction and discontinuation in this cohort of patients. Adrenal cortical insufficiency is defined by the inability of the adrenal cortex to produce sufficient amounts of glucocorticoids and/or mineralocorticoids leading to a severe and potentially life-threatening condition. The most common cause of drug-induced adrenal insufficiency is the suppression of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis by exogenous glucocorticoid doses ≥5 mg prednisolone equivalent for more than 4 weeks. The aim of the study was to ascertain the number of patients with GvHD receiving ECP that are affected by adrenocortical insufficiency.

This study was designed to identify factors associated with clinical response to extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) and mortality after ECP in lung allograft recipients with bronchiolitis obliterans.Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) values obtained 6 months before (baseline) and 6 months after initiation of ECP were used to plot the linear relationship between FEV1 versus time before and after ECP. Response to ECP was assigned when a positive integer was derived after subtracting the baseline rate of decline from the rate of decline 6 months after ECP. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify demographic, treatment-related factors or spirometric parameters that may be associated with response to ECP or mortality at either 6 or 16 months after initiation of ECP.Forced expiratory volume in 1 second just before ECP was associated with mortality (P = 0.007) at 16 months after ECP initiation. An FEV1 of 1.50 L or less had a sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 60% to identify patients who died within 16 months after ECP initiation. Patients whose FEV1 decline exceeded 40 mL/month were 12 times more likely to have a response to ECP (P = 0.0001). Patients whose decline in FEV1 before ECP was statistically significant (P0.05) were nearly 10 times (P = 0.008) more likely to respond to ECP.Forced expiratory volume in 1 second is an important predictor of mortality, and the response to ECP is influenced by both the extent (40 mL/mo) and statistical significance of the relationship between FEV1 versus time before ECP initiation. Therefore, earlier bronchiolitis obliterans detection and more timely implementation of ECP (ie, when FEV1 values1.5 L) should be considered especially in patients with a more aggressive rate of decline of lung function.

A middle-aged gentleman who was diagnosed with high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), Rai stage IV, Binet C with del(17p) and del(13q) underwent allogeneic haematopoeitic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) from a human leukocyte antigen (HLA) identical sister. The patient developed extensive skin, oral, and liver chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD) required tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and prednisolone. At seventh month after allo-HSCT, the patient presented with systemic symptoms, right cervical lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly, marked pancytopaenia, and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Bone marrow study, immunophenotyping (IP), chromosome analysis, and PET-CT scan confirmed relapsed CLL with no evidence of Richter’s transformation or posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD). Withdrawal of immunosuppressant (IS) worsened cutaneous and liver GVHD. Chemotherapy was not a suitable treatment option in view of immunodeficiency. The patient underwent extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) therapy eventually for extensive chronic GVHD, and the IS were gradually tapered to the minimal effective dose. The relapsed CLL was treated successfully with oral venetoclax accessible via a compassionate drug program. This case highlights challenges in managing relapsed CLL and loss of graft-versus-leukaemia (GVL) effect despite extensive chronic GVHD. Venetoclax is an effective and well-tolerated oral novel agent for relapsed CLL after allo-HSCT.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the circulating T regulatory cells (Tregs) in patients undergoing extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) for the prevention of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and to search for any correlation between Tregs counts and chronic GvHD occurrence. Among n = 12 patients with complete longitudinal data, the median cumulative values of absolute peripheral Tregs counts were 21.64 and 63.49 cells/µL for patients who developed chronic GvHD and those who did not develop it, respectively (p = 0.05). The analysis of the median absolute counts of peripheral HLA-DR + Tregs provided similar results, showing that 20% (1 out of 5) and 100% (7 out of 7) of patients with HLA-DR + Tregs values of > 5 cells/µL were in the GvHD and non-GvHD groups, respectively (p = 0.01). In conclusion, the present results support the involvement of Tregs in the prevention of chronic GvHD in patients receiving ECP and suggest Tregs count as a potential biomarker of ECP effectiveness. Future strategies are needed to enhance Tregs expansion and/or activity in conjunction with ECP for an effective chronic GvHD prevention.

The aim of the study was to investigate safety and if extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) may change health criteria (HC) and quality of life (QoL). Material and method: 560 patients (33 % women) were treated with ECP for a total of 13,871 procedures during a 17-years period. Mean age was 48 years (+/- 18, range 3-81 years). Self-estimation of QoL was graded: 0 (suicidal) up to 10 (best ever) and HC: 0 (Bed ridden, ICU condition) up to 10 (athletic). Adverse events were analyzed. ANOVA and paired comparisons were performed. Results: Patients were treated due to graft versus host disease (GVHD, n = 317), skin lymphoma (n = 70), solid organ transplants (n = 47), skin diseases (n = 20) and other diseases (n = 106). Adverse events (AEs) were registered in 5.4 % of the first treatments and in 1.2 % of the subsequent procedures. Severe AEs were present in 0.04 % of all procedures. No patient died due to the procedure. Tingling and stitching were the most common AE. For those with GVHD an improvement was noticed within approximately 10 procedures of ECP in the severity stage, QoL (from a mean of 6.1 to 6.8, p 0.002) and the HC (6.1 - 6.4, p < 0.014) and improved further with added procedures. Conclusion: Photopheresis is an established therapy with few side effects. The present study of soft variables indicate that GVHD shows benefits upon ECP within approximately 10 procedures in regard to the severity of mainly skin GVHD, and lower baseline levels of HC and QoL. Funding Agencies|Swedish Communes and Regions

Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is associated with an increased risk of graft- versus-host disease (GvHD), a strong prognostic predictor of early mortality within the first 2 years following allo-HSCT. The objective of this study was to describe the harm outcomes reported among patients receiving second- and third-line treatment as part of the management for GvHD via a systematic literature review. Methods: A total of 34 studies met the systematic review inclusion criteria, reporting adverse events (AEs) across 12 different second- and third-line therapies. Results: A total of 14 studies reported AEs across nine different therapies used in the treatment of acute GvHD (aGvHD), 17 studies reported AEs of eight different treatments for chronic GvHD (cGvHD) and 3 reported a mixed population. Infections were the AE reported most widely, followed by haematologic events and laboratory abnormalities. Reported infections per patient were lower under extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) for aGvHD (0.267 infections per patient over 6 months) relative to any of the therapies studied (ranging from 0.853 infections per patient per 6 months under etanercept up to 1.998 infections per patient on inolimomab). Conclusion: The reported incidence of infectious AEs in aGvHD and grade 3–5 AEs in cGvHD was lower on ECP compared with pharmaceutical management.

BACKGROUND Sezary Syndrome (SS) is a rare and aggressive variant of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma characterized by erythroderma, generalized lymphadenopathy and atypical lymphocytes in peripheral blood. The aim of the study is to describe our experience with SS patients. METHODS Nine SS patients were retrospectively identified within 288 patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs) followed from 1977 to 2017 in the Unit of Dermatology, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy. RESULTS Nine SS patients were described: 5 males and 4 females, mean age at diagnosis 66.1 years (49-87 y), overall survival (OS) after SS diagnosis was 2.6 years (31.5 ms). All the patients showed erythroderma, pruritus and lymphadenopathy. Palmo-plantar hyperkeratosis, nail lesions, alopecia and ectropion were also present. One patient was excluded for significative differences in management. Three lines treatment -extracorporeal photopheresis plus immunomodulator/s plus photo-photochemotherapy- was the most used first-line option for induction of remission, reached in 4 patients out of 8: 3 with Complete Remission (CR), 1 with Partial Remission (PR). Prognostic variables were investigated by univariate analysis: hypereosinophilia, highly elevated β 2 µglobulin >3500 µg/L, male sex and highly elevated LDH>450 U/L resulted with statistical power. CONCLUSIONS The improved comprehension of SS pathogenesis is progressively increasing the still poor survival: 38.5 months (3.2 years) considering only the 6 patients followed in the last five years, versus overall 31.5 months (2.6 years). The correct identification of SS patients remains determinant for the proper overall management. Among unfavorable prognostic markers, levels of β 2 µglobulin allow stratification of patients.