Search

PURPOSE The CLL14 study has established one-year fixed-duration treatment of venetoclax and obinutuzumab (Ven-Obi) for patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia. With all patients off treatment for at least three years, we report a detailed analysis of minimal residual disease (MRD) kinetics and long-term outcome of patients treated in the CLL14 study. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomly assigned to receive six cycles of obinutuzumab with 12 cycles of venetoclax or 12 cycles of chlorambucil (Clb-Obi). Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary end point. Key secondary end points included rates of undetectable MRD and overall survival. To analyze MRD kinetics, a population-based growth model with nonlinear mixed effects approach was developed. RESULTS Of 432 patients, 216 were assigned to Ven-Obi and 216 to Clb-Obi. Three months after treatment completion, 40% of patients in the Ven-Obi arm (7% in the Clb-Obi arm) had undetectable MRD levels < 10−6 by next-generation sequencing in peripheral blood. Median MRD doubling time was longer after Ven-Obi than Clb-Obi therapy (median 80 v 69 days). At a median follow-up of 52.4 months, a sustained significant PFS improvement was observed in the Ven-Obi arm compared with Clb-Obi (median not reached v 36.4 months; hazard ratio 0.33; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.45; P < .0001). The estimated 4-year PFS rate was 74.0% in the Ven-Obi and 35.4% in the Clb-Obi arm. No difference in overall survival was observed (hazard ratio 0.85; 95% CI, 0.54 to 1.35; P = .49). No new safety signals occurred. CONCLUSION Appearance of MRD after Ven-Obi is significantly slower than that after Clb-Obi with more effective MRD reduction. These findings translate into a superior long-term efficacy with the majority of Ven-Obi–treated patients remaining in remission.

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) combine the specificity of an antibody with the cytotoxicity of a chemical agent. They represent a rapidly evolving area of oncology drug development and hold significant promise. There are currently nine ADCs on the market, more than half of which gained US Food and Drug Administration approval more recently, since 2019. Despite their enormous promise, the therapeutic window for these ADCs remains relatively narrow, especially when compared with other oncology drugs, such as targeted therapies or checkpoint inhibitors. In this review, we provide a detailed overview of the five dosing regimen optimization strategies that have been leveraged to broaden the therapeutic window by mitigating the safety risks while maintaining efficacy. These include body weight cap dosing; treatment duration capping; dose schedule (e.g., dosing frequency and dose fractionation); response-guided dosing recommendations; and randomized dose-finding. We then discuss how the lessons learned from these studies can inform ADC development going forward. Informed application of these dosing strategies should allow researchers to maximize the safety and efficacy for next-generation ADCs.

Purpose The CD79b-targeted antibody–drug conjugate polatuzumab vedotin (pola), alone and with chemoimmunotherapy, has clinical efficacy and a tolerable safety profile in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). We assessed (a) whether exposure from global studies of pola is comparable to Asian patients, and (b) if the recommended pola dose is appropriate in Asian patients based on exposure. Methods The pharmacokinetics (PK) of pola in Asian and global populations was characterized for three analytes (antibody-conjugated monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) [acMMAE], total antibody, and unconjugated MMAE) in five phase 1b/2 single-agent and combination studies in B-NHL patients (JO29138 [JAPICCTI‐142580], DCS4968g [NCT01290549], GO27834 [NCT01691898], GO29044 [NCT01992653], and GO29365 [NCT02257567]). PK data were compared between Japanese phase 1 JO29138 (JAPICCTI‐142580) and global phase 1 DCS4968g (NCT01290549) studies and between Asian and non-Asian patients in the randomized relapsed/refractory B-NHL cohorts of the phase 1b/2 study GO29365 (NCT02257567). A population PK (popPK) model was used to assess the effects of Asian race and region on acMMAE and unconjugated MMAE exposure. Results PK non-compartmental analysis (NCA) parameters for the key analyte acMMAE in the Japanese JO29138 (JAPICCTI‐142580) and global phase 1 DCS4968g (NCT01290549) studies were similar. In GO29365 (NCT02257567), the phase 1b/2 combination study, mean exposure to the analytes was generally lower in Asian patients (by ~ 9.9 to 17.5%), but not to a clinically meaningful extent. Overall, the popPK model further suggested comparable PK in Asian patients with B-NHL (race or region) versus non-Asian patients. Conclusion Race has no clinically meaningful effect on pola PK. These results (and observations from efficacy/safety exposure–response analyses) support no pola dose adjustments are warranted for Asian patients with DLBCL.

Introduction Outcomes remain poor in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who overexpress BCL-2 protein. We present population pharmacokinetics (PopPK) and exposure–response (ER) analyses for venetoclax (a selective BCL-2 inhibitor) administered with rituximab-cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) and previously untreated (1L) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) from the phase 1b/2 CAVALLI study, to confirm dose selection for future studies. Methods Analyses included 216 patients with R/R or 1L NHL treated for eight 21-day cycles with 400–800 mg venetoclax (cycle 1: days 4–10; cycles 2–8: days 1–10) in combination with R for eight cycles and CHOP for 6–8 cycles. A legacy PopPK model for venetoclax was used to describe the observed data and provide post hoc PK parameters. Venetoclax steady-state exposure (AUCss) was used to predict clinical efficacy, safety, or tolerability. To isolate the effect of venetoclax, ER analyses referenced data from the R-CHOP arm of a historical control study, GOYA, in 1L DLBCL. Results There was no significant association between venetoclax AUCss and progression-free survival or complete response either for all-comers or the BCL-2-immunohistochemistry-positive subpopulation. No statistically significant trends were observed with venetoclax AUCss and the key grade ≥ 3 adverse events and serious adverse events. Similar dose intensities were observed for venetoclax and R-CHOP components across venetoclax exposures, suggesting venetoclax did not impact delivery of the R-CHOP backbone. Conclusions The PopPK and ER analyses, in addition to the positive benefit–risk observed in the clinical data, support the selection of 800 mg venetoclax given with R-CHOP for future studies in BCL-2-immunohistochemistry-positive patients with 1L DLBCL. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02055820. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01919-z.

Purpose The established two-analyte integrated population pharmacokinetic model was applied to assess the impact of intrinsic/extrinsic factors on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of polatuzumab vedotin (pola) in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) following bodyweight-based dosing. Methods Model simulations based on individual empirical Bayes estimates were used to evaluate the impact of intrinsic/extrinsic factors as patient subgroups on Cycle 6 exposures. Intrinsic factors included bodyweight, age, sex, hepatic and renal functions. Extrinsic factors included rituximab/obinutuzumab or bendamustine combination with pola and manufacturing process. The predicted impact on exposures along with the established exposure-response relationships were used to assess clinical relevance. Results No clinically meaningful differences in Cycle 6 pola exposures were found for the following subgroups: bodyweight 100–146 kg versus 38–versus versus male, mild hepatic impairment versus normal, mild-to-moderate renal impairment versus normal. Co-administration of rituximab/obinutuzumab or bendamustine, and change in the pola manufacturing process, also had no meaningful impact on PK. Conclusions In patients with NHL, bodyweight-based dosing is adequate, and no further dose adjustment is recommended for the heavier subgroup (100–146 kg). In addition, no dose adjustments are recommended for other subgroups based on intrinsic/extrinsic factors evaluated.

Model-informed drug development (MIDD) has become an important approach to improving clinical trial efficiency, optimizing drug dosing, and proposing drug labeling in the absence of dedicated clinical trials. For the first time, we developed a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model-based approach to assess CYP3A-mediated drug-drug interaction (DDI) risk for polatuzumab vedotin (Polivy), an anti-CD79b-vc-monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) antibody-drug conjugate (ADC). The model was developed and verified using data from the existing clinical DDI study for brentuximab vedotin, a similar vc-MMAE ADC. Analogous to the brentuximab vedotin clinical study, polatuzumab vedotin at the proposed labeled dose was predicted to have a limited drug interaction potential with strong CYP3A inhibitor and inducer. Polatuzumab vedotin was also predicted to neither inhibit nor induce CYP3A. The present work demonstrated a high-impact application using a PBPK MIDD approach to predict the CYP3A-mediated DDI to enable drug labeling in the absence of any dedicated clinical DDI study. The key considerations for the PBPK report included in the Biologics License Application/Marketing Authorization Application submission, as well as the strategy and responses to address some of the critical and challenging questions from the health authorities following the submission are also discussed. Our experience and associated perspective using a PBPK approach to ultimately enable a drug interaction label claim for polatuzumab vedotin in lieu of a dedicated clinical DDI study, as well as the interactions with the regulatory agencies, further provides confidence in applying MIDD to accelerate the registration and approval of new drug therapies.

Exposure-response relationships were investigated to assess the risk/benefit of polatuzumab vedotin (pola) + bendamustine-rituximab (pola + BR) in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL). Analyses were conducted in pivotal study GO29365 (NCT02257567; BR/pola + BR/pola + BG [BG: bendamustine-obinutuzumab]; 1.8 mg/kg pola, every 3 weeks [Q3W], six cycles), and supportive studies DCS4968g (NCT01290549) and GO27834 (NCT01691898) (pola/pola + R/pola + G; 0.1-2.4 mg/kg pola Q3W; eight-cycle landmark), separately. Exposure was characterized as simulated cycle-6 AUC and

Minimal residual disease (MRD) is an important emerging clinical end point in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The objective of this research was to develop an integrated mechanistic model to evaluate the impact of venetoclax-rituximab combination therapy on MRD kinetics. Using data from 435 patients with relapsed or refractory CLL, an integrated model was developed and validated that accounted for venetoclax dosing and pharmacokinetics, rituximab treatment, absolute lymphocyte count, and blood and bone marrow (BM) MRD data. Simulations of venetoclax-rituximab (six cycles) combination predicted the proportion (90% confidence interval) of patients with BM MRD below 10-4 to be 57% (54-61%) and 63% (59-67%) at 12 and 24 months of treatment, respectively. Continued venetoclax treatment to 48 months only increased the predicted rate of negative BM MRD to 66% (63-70%). These results indicate that treatment with venetoclax-rituximab combination for a finite 2-year period would nearly maximize the rate of negative BM MRD (< 10-4 ). Preliminary clinical data agree with these predictions and more long-term follow-up data are awaited to confirm the same.

To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of XL647 and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of oral XL647 once-daily using intermittent or continuous dosing schedules. Patients with advanced solid malignancies were enrolled in successive cohorts to receive escalating dose levels of oral once-daily XL647 using two different dosing schedules: 5 consecutive days of every 14-day cycle (study XL647-001) or continuously over 28-day cycles (study XL647-002). PK sampling was performed to determine Cmax, and AUC. Patients remained on study until progressive disease or unacceptable AEs. In XL647-001, 42 individuals were enrolled across 9 dose levels. The most frequently occurring drug-related AEs were diarrhea, nausea, rash, and fatigue. Expansion of the 4.68 mg/kg cohort to 6 patients occurred without further dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and this was considered the MTD. In XL647-002, 31 patients were enrolled across 5 dose levels. A DLT of grade 3 pneumonitis occurred in 1/6 patients at 300 mg, which was declared the MTD. The most common AEs included grade 1/2 rash, diarrhea, fatigue, dysgeusia, and QTc prolongation. Levels of pharmacodynamic plasma markers were not consistently changed after XL647 and no conclusions could be drawn with this limited data set. For oral XL647, the MTD was 4.68 mg/kg or 350 mg fixed dose when administered once-daily for 5 consecutive days of every 14-day cycle and was 300 mg when administered once-daily continuously. XL647 was well tolerated at doses up to the MTD.

Background In the phase III METEOR trial, tyrosine kinase inhibitor cabozantinib significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and overall survival compared to everolimus in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who had received prior VEGFR inhibitor therapy. In METEOR, RCC patients started at a daily 60-mg cabozantinib tablet (Cabometyx™) dose but could reduce to 40- or 20-mg to achieve a tolerated exposure. Objectives and methods Exposure–response (ER) models were developed to characterize the relationship between cabozantinib at clinically relevant exposures in RCC patients enrolled in METEOR and efficacy (PFS and tumor response) and safety endpoints. Results Compared to the average steady-state cabozantinib concentration for a 60-mg dose, exposures at simulated 40- and 20-mg starting doses were predicted to result in higher risk of disease progression or death [hazard ratios (HRs) of 1.10 and 1.39, respectively], lower maximal median reduction in tumor size (− 11.9 vs − 9.1 and − 4.5%, respectively), and lower ORR (19.1 vs 15.6 and 8.7%, respectively). The 60-mg exposure was also associated with higher risk for selected adverse events (AEs) palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (grade ≥ 1), fatigue/asthenia (grade ≥ 3), diarrhea (grade ≥ 3), and hypertension (predicted HRs of 2.21, 2.01, 1.78, and 1.85, respectively) relative to the predicted average steady-state cabozantinib concentration for a 20-mg starting dose. Conclusion ER modeling predicted that cabozantinib exposures in RCC patients at the 60-mg starting dose would provide greater anti-tumor activity relative to exposures at simulated 40- and 20-mg starting doses that were associated with decreased rates of clinically relevant AEs. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00280-018-3579-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Purpose An integrated population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model was developed to describe the pharmacokinetics (PK) of tyrosine kinase inhibitor cabozantinib in healthy volunteers (HVs) and patients with various cancer types and to identify any differences in cabozantinib PK across these populations. Methods Plasma concentration data used to develop the popPK model were obtained from nine clinical trials (8072 concentrations from 1534 HVs or patients) of cabozantinib in HVs and patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC), glioblastoma multiforme, castration-resistant prostate cancer, or other advanced malignancies. Results PK data across studies were adequately characterized by a two-compartment disposition model with dual first- and zero-order absorption processes and first-order elimination. Baseline demographic covariates (age, weight, gender, race, and cancer type) were generally predicted to have a small-to-moderate impact on apparent clearance (CL/F). However, MTC cancer type did show an approximately 93% higher CL/F relative to HVs following chronic dosing, resulting in approximately 40–50% lower predicted steady-state cabozantinib plasma concentrations. Conclusion This popPK analysis showed cabozantinib CL/F values to be higher for patients with MTC and may account for the higher dosage required in this patient population (140-mg) to achieve plasma exposures comparable to those in patients with RCC and other tumor types administered a 60-mg cabozantinib tablet dose. Possible factors that may underlie the higher cabozantinib clearance observed in MTC patients are discussed. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00280-018-3581-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

This study evaluated factors impacting QTc interval in a phase 3 trial of cabozantinib in progressive, metastatic, medullary thyroid cancer (MTC). Electrocardiogram (12-lead ECG) measurements were obtained at screening, and at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and 6 h post-dose on Days 1 and 29 in a phase 3 study in patients with MTC treated with cabozantinib (140 mg/day). Central tendency analyses were conducted on baseline-corrected QTc values. Linear and nonlinear mixed-effects models were used to evaluate potential factors affecting the QTc interval, including serum electrolytes, patient demographics, and cabozantinib concentration. Central tendency analysis showed that oral cabozantinib (140 mg/day) produced a 10–15 ms increase in delta–delta Fridericia corrected QT (∆∆QTcF) and delta–delta study-specific corrected QT (∆∆QTcS) on Day 29, but not on Day 1. Further analysis showed that QTcS provided a slightly more accurate QT correction than QTcF. Mixed-effects models evaluating serum electrolytes, age, sex, and cabozantinib concentration showed that decreased serum calcium and potassium could explain the majority of cabozantinib treatment-associated QTcS prolongation observed in this study. Cabozantinib treatment prolongs the ∆∆QTcF interval by 10–15 ms. There was the absence of a strong relationship between cabozantinib concentration and QTcS prolongation. Cabozantinib treatment effects on serum calcium and potassium best explain the QTcS prolongation observed in this study.

Context: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) represent a group of bone marrow disorders involving cytopenia, hypercellular bone marrow, and dysplastic hematopoietic progenitors. Death is commonly caused by the effects of cytopenia, leading to infections or bleeding [1]. Finding efficacious treatment regimens in MDS remains a challenge as it involves understanding of both disease induced and treatment related cytopenias. Objective: The objective was to develop a semi-mechanistic model of disease progression in MDS based on clinical data, involving relevant hematopoietic cells that can describe the effect of drug intervention with venetoclax azacitidine combination therapy. The model was subsequently used to simulate different treatment regimens (with respect to dose, dosing duration in a cycle, and number of cycles) and compare the outcomes. Study Design and Data: Data from an ongoing Phase 1b study evaluating the safety and efficacy of venetoclax (400 mg or 800 mg for 28 days or 100 mg to 400 mg for 14 days in each 28-day cycle) with azacitidine (75 mg/m2 on days 1-7 of each cycle) in treatment-naive patients with higher-risk MDS were used for the analysis. The data contained venetoclax concentrations, neutrophil, red blood cell, and platelet count in the blood and blasts in the bone marrow. Methods: An integrated semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model was developed that accounted for venetoclax PK and azacitidine treatment to describe time dynamics of neutrophils, red blood cells, and platelets. The model also included crowding in the bone marrow due to excess stem cells, MDS blasts, and progenitor cells, and its effect on hematopoiesis. Results: The model described the observed clinical data well and showed predictive ability across considered cell types. Complete remission (CR) and marrow complete remission (mCR) rates were predicted close to observed rates in the study. Simulated efficacy (recovery of blast count, CR, and mCR rates) and safety (neutropenia and thrombocytopenia) endpoints are comparable to the expected outcomes from various dosing regimens. Conclusions: A model describing drug-disease interactions in MDS was developed that integrates multiple end points and differentiates disease driven from drug-induced cytopenia. Reference: [1] Dayyani, F, et al. Cause of death in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Cancer. 2010 May 1; 116.9:2174-2179. Disclosures: The analysis presented was funded by AbbVie. AbbVie contributed to the design, research, and interpretation of data, writing, reviewing, and approving the publication. NT, JZ, RM, BE, JW, SM, and SG are employees of AbbVie and may hold stock. AHW receives honoraria from Novartis, Astellas, Pfizer, Macrogenics, Abbvie, Genentech, Servier, Celgene, Amgen, Astra Zeneca and Janssen. AHW also receives research funding from Novartis, Celgene, Abbvie, Servier, Astra Zeneca and Amgen. AHW is a former employee of the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute and receives a fraction of its royalty stream related to venetoclax. G-GM is an investigator in AbbVie funded Clinical Trials. DM is a Genentech employee and may own stock. C.M. performed the analysis at AbbVie during an internship. C.M. also receives research funding from an industry consortium (AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Grunenthal GmbH, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Merck KGaA and Sanofi) for the PharMetrX program

Background: Venetoclax is a selective B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) inhibitor approved for use as monotherapy or with rituximab in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The objectives of the current analysis of observed data from adult patients randomized to venetoclax–rituximab in the phase III MURANO study were to characterize venetoclax pharmacokinetics (PKs) using a Bayesian approach, evaluate whether a previously developed population PK model for venetoclax can describe the PKs of venetoclax when administered with rituximab, and to determine post hoc estimates of PK parameters for the exposure–response analysis. Methods: Parameter estimates and uncertainty estimated by a population PK model were used as priors. Additional covariate effects (CLL risk status, geographic region, and 17p deletion [del(17p)] status) were added to the model. The updated model was used to describe venetoclax PKs after repeated dosing in combination with rituximab, and to determine post hoc estimates of PK parameters for exposure–response analysis. Results: The PK analysis included 600 quantifiable venetoclax PK samples from 182 patients in the MURANO study. Model evaluation using standard diagnostic plots, visual predictive checks, and normalized prediction distribution error plots indicated no model deficiencies. There was no significant relationship between venetoclax apparent clearance (CL/F) and bodyweight, age, sex, mild and moderate hepatic and renal impairment, or coadministration of weak cytochrome P450 3A inhibitors. The chromosomal abnormality del(17p) and CLL risk status had no apparent effect on the PKs of venetoclax. A minimal increase in venetoclax CL/F (approximately 7%) was observed after coadministration with rituximab. CL/F was 30% lower in patients from Central and Eastern Europe (n = 60) or Asia (n = 4) compared with other regions (95% confidence interval [CI] 21–39%). Apparent central volume of distribution was 30% lower (95% CI 22–38%) in females (n = 56) compared with males (n = 126). No clinically significant impact of region or sex was observed on key safety and efficacy outcomes. Conclusions: The Bayesian model successfully characterized venetoclax PKs over time and confirmed key covariates affecting PKs in the MURANO study. The model was deemed appropriate for further use in simulations and for generating individual patient PK parameters for subsequent exposure–response evaluation.

Exposure–response relationships from a phase 1b (M13-365) and phase 3 (MURANO) study were investigated to assess benefit/risk of venetoclax 400 mg daily plus rituximab in relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Dose intensities were summarized by tertiles of predicted venetoclax steady-state average concentrations based on nominal venetoclax dose (CmeanSS,nominal) for tolerability; exposure–safety analyses used logistic regression. Exposure–progression-free survival (PFS) relationships were assessed using MURANO data, with CmeanSS,nominal as a grouping factor. Covariates were demographics, geographic region, study, baseline disease characteristics, ECOG performance status, responsiveness to prior therapy, and chromosomal abnormalities. There was no significant effect of covariates on grade ≥3 neutropenia/infection or PFS, and no relationship between venetoclax exposure and these endpoints, or venetoclax or rituximab dose intensity. These results support the recommended venetoclax 400 mg daily dose in combination with rituximab in patients with R/R CLL or small lymphocytic leukemia.

A two‐analyte integrated population pharmacokinetic (PK) model that simultaneously describes concentrations of antibody‐conjugated monomethyl auristatin E (acMMAE) and unconjugated MMAE following repeated administrations of polatuzumab vedotin (pola) was developed based on data from four clinical studies of pola in patients with non‐Hodgkin lymphoma. A two‐compartment model with a nonspecific, time‐dependent linear clearance, a linear time‐dependent exponentially declining clearance, and a Michaelis–Menten clearance provided a good fit of the acMMAE plasma PK profiles. All three acMMAE elimination pathways contributed to the input to the central compartment of unconjugated MMAE, which was also described by a two‐compartment model. Population PK parameters, covariate effects, and interindividual variability of model parameters were estimated. The impact of clinically relevant covariates on PK exposures of each analyte were quantified and reported to support key label claims.

Venetoclax is a selective B cell lymphoma-2 inhibitor. It is approved for treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and is being investigated for other hematological malignancies. Venetoclax is predominantly eliminated by the liver; therefore, there is a need to investigate the effect of hepatic insufficiency on venetoclax pharmacokinetics. A phase I study was carried out in 24 women with normal hepatic function or mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment (based on Child–Pugh scores), who received a single 50 mg dose of venetoclax with a low-fat meal. Blood samples were collected up to 120 h after venetoclax administration. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using non-compartmental methods. Venetoclax maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment were similar to subjects with normal hepatic function. Mean venetoclax AUC in subjects with severe hepatic impairment was 2.3- to 2.7-fold higher than in subjects with normal hepatic function. The half-life of venetoclax in subjects with severe hepatic impairment was approximately two-fold longer than in subjects with normal hepatic function and subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment. Unbound fractions of venetoclax in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment were similar to the subjects with normal hepatic function. No significant adverse safety events were reported. No venetoclax dosage adjustment is required in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment. In subjects with severe hepatic impairment, a 50% dose reduction of venetoclax is recommended to account for higher exposures and the longer half-life.

Introduction: Venetoclax (VEN), an orally bioavailable selective BCL-2 inhibitor, was granted accelerated approval by the FDA for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in combination with a hypomethylating agent (HMA) or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC). The objective of this analysis was to characterize the exposure-efficacy and exposure-safety relationships using data from the nonrandomized Phase 1/2 studies and the confirmatory Phase 3 studies in subjects with treatment-naïve AML who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Methods: A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for VEN was characterized using data from 771 AML subjects across 5 Phase 1 - 3 studies including subjects with relapsed/refractory AML and subjects with treatment-naïve AML who were ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. PK parameters from this model were used to calculate the exposure metric, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve at steady-state (AUCss), for exposure-efficacy and exposure-safety analyses. Logistic regression and Cox proportional-hazards models were used to characterize the exposure-response relationships for overall survival, event-free survival, and conversion to post-baseline transfusion independence for red blood cells or platelets as well as key safety endpoints of treatment-emergent Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and infections. Additionally, best overall response of complete remission (CR), CR + CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi), and CR + CR with partial hematological recovery (CRh) were also characterized in the exposure-response analyses. Separate analyses were performed for VEN + HMA and VEN + LDAC, including subjects taking placebo (PBO) + HMA or PBO + LDAC, respectively, to inform the intercepts. A total of 575 subjects with treatment-naïve AML were included in the exposure-response analyses for VEN + HMA and 279 subjects with treatment-naïve AML were included in the exposure-response analyses for VEN + LDAC. Results: VEN + HMA: For all efficacy endpoints studied, there was a clear trend for higher efficacy in subjects treated with VEN + HMA as compared to PBO in combination with azacitidine (AZA). When PBO patients were included, significant exposure-response relationships between VEN exposure and overall survival and event-free survival were identified, and a maximal effect (Emax) model best described the statistically significant positive relationships between VEN exposure and best overall response of CR + CRi and CR + CRh. However, there were no apparent relationships between VEN exposure and any efficacy endpoint without the inclusion of PBO subjects, suggesting that the beneficial effect of VEN is already maximized in the dose range studied (400 to 1200 mg daily [QD]). No exposure-response relationship was identified between VEN exposure and treatment-emergent Grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia or infections. An Emax model best described the statistically significant relationship between VEN exposure and treatment-emergent Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia, consistent with the clinical finding that subjects in the VEN + HMA treatment arms had higher rates of reported neutropenia than those in the PBO + AZA arm. VEN + LDAC: For all efficacy endpoints studied, there was a clear trend for higher efficacy in subjects treated with VEN + LDAC as compared to PBO + LDAC. With PBO subjects included, an Emax model best described the statistically significant relationships between VEN exposure and best overall response of CR, CR + CRi, and CR + CRh, with probability of response plateauing at exposures corresponding to 600 mg QD of VEN. There were no apparent relationships between VEN exposure and any efficacy endpoint when the PBO subjects were excluded from analysis, indicating that the beneficial effect of VEN is already maximized at 600 mg QD. Although reported rates of treatment-emergent Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia were higher in the VEN + LDAC treatment arms as compared to PBO + LDAC, no significant exposure-response relationships were found between VEN exposure and treatment-emergent Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, or infections. Conclusion: The VEN exposure-efficacy and exposure-safety analyses confirm the benefit of adding VEN to either HMA or LDAC and support the dose regimens of VEN 400 mg QD in combination with an HMA and VEN 600 mg QD in combination with LDAC in treatment-naïve AML patients who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Disclosures Eckert: AbbVie Inc.: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or other options. Brackman:AbbVie Inc.: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or other options. Menon:AbbVie Inc.: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or other options. Salem:AbbVie Inc.: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or other options. Potluri:AbbVie: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or stock options. Smith:Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy. Wei:AbbVie Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; MacroGenics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Walter and Eliza Hall Institute: Other: former employee and receives a fraction of its royalty stream related to venetoclax; Pfizer: Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hayslip:Abbvie Inc: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or other options. Miles:Genentech Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Mensing:AbbVie Inc.: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or other options. Gopalakrishnan:AbbVie Inc.: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or other options. Zha:AbbVie Inc.: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or other options.

Cabozantinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved in the USA and EU for the treatment of patients with progressive, metastatic medullary thyroid cancer (MTC). The indicated cabozantinib dose is 140 mg/day, with dose modifications allowed for patients who develop adverse events (AEs). The analysis objective was to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model in MTC patients and to use the model for exposure-response (ER) analysis of dose modifications. A PopPK model for cabozantinib was developed using data from three clinical trials (2079 evaluations from 289 patients), including a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study of patients with progressive, metastatic MTC. The PopPK model predictions [model-predicted steady-state area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUCss,pred)] were used for an ER analysis of the time to first dose modification. The final PopPK model was a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and first-order elimination. Estimated cabozantinib apparent oral clearance (CL/F) and apparent volume of distribution (V c/F) were 106 L/day [±2.98 % relative standard error (RSE)] (males) and 349 L (±2.73 % RSE), respectively. CL/F was reduced by 22 % (to 83 L/day) in females. Sex and body mass index (BMI) were significant covariates that combined contributed 15 % to the variability in cabozantinib CL/F, but did not warrant dose adjustment. Higher cabozantinib AUCss,pred was correlated to an increased risk of early dose modification and a lower average dose through to Day 85. Early cabozantinib dose modification was not associated with a reduction in progression-free survival (PFS). A PopPK model was developed for cabozantinib pharmacokinetics in MTC patients. Higher cabozantinib exposure was associated with earlier first dose modification and a lower average administered dose through to Day 85. Early first dose modification did not appear to impact PFS.

Cabozantinib is a small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has been approved for the treatment of patients with progressive, metastatic medullary thyroid cancer. In vitro data indicate that (1) cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 is the primary CYP isoenzyme involved in the metabolism of cabozantinib, and (2) CYP2C8 is the CYP isoenzyme most potently inhibited by cabozantinib with potential for in vivo inhibition at clinically relevant plasma exposures. Pharmacokinetic (PK) drug-drug interactions (DDIs) were evaluated clinically between cabozantinib and (1) a CYP3A inducer (rifampin) in healthy volunteers, (2) a CYP3A inhibitor (ketoconazole) in healthy volunteers, and (3) a CYP2C8 substrate (rosiglitazone) in patients with solid tumors. Compared with cabozantinib given alone, coadministration with rifampin resulted in a 4.3-fold higher plasma clearance (CL/F) of cabozantinib and a 77% decrease in cabozantinib plasma AUC0-inf , whereas coadministration with ketoconazole decreased cabozantinib CL/F by 29% and increased cabozantinib AUC0-inf by 38%. Chronic coadministration with cabozantinib resulted in no significant effect on rosiglitazone plasma Cmax , AUC0-24 , or AUC0-inf . In summary, chronic use of strong CYP3A inducers and inhibitors should be avoided when cabozantinib is administered, and cabozantinib at clinically relevant exposures is not anticipated to markedly affect the PK of concomitant medications via CYP enzyme inhibition.

Purpose Cabozantinib is a multi-kinase inhibitor that targets MET, AXL, and VEGFR2, and may synergize with EGFR inhibition in NSCLC. Cabozantinib was assessed alone or in combination with erlotinib in patients with progressive NSCLC and EGFR mutations who had previously received erlotinib. Methods This was a phase Ib/II study (NCT00596648). The primary objectives of phase I were to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics and to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of cabozantinib plus erlotinib in patients who failed prior erlotinib treatment. In phase II, patients with prior response or stable disease with erlotinib who progressed were randomized to single-agent cabozantinib 100 mg qd vs cabozantinib 100 mg qd and erlotinib 50 mg qd (phase I MTD), with a primary objective of estimating objective response rate (ORR). Results Sixty-four patients were treated in phase I. Doses of 100 mg cabozantinib plus 50 mg erlotinib, or 40 mg cabozantinib plus 150 mg erlotinib were determined to be MTDs. Diarrhea was the most frequent dose-limiting toxicity and the most frequent AE (87.5% of patients). The ORR for phase I was 8.2% (90% CI 3.3–16.5). In phase II, one patient in the cabozantinib arm (N = 15) experienced a partial response, for an ORR of 6.7% (90% CI 0.3–27.9), with no responses for cabozantinib plus erlotinib (N = 13). There was no evidence that co-administration of cabozantinib markedly altered erlotinib pharmacokinetics or vice versa. Conclusions Despite responses with cabozantinib/erlotinib in phase I, there were no responses in the combination arm of phase II in patients with acquired resistance to erlotinib. Cabozantinib did not appear to re-sensitize these patients to erlotinib. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00280-017-3283-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The use of cone beam CT (CBCT) is common among dentists and dental specialists in North America and the world. The regions of interest captured by these machines vary in size and applications are numerous. If using the image data from this modality, clinicians are obligated to examine the entire volume and to understand and recognize all the anatomy in the head and neck region that can be portrayed and any abnormalities detected in otherwise normal surroundings. This article attempts to identify common entities found in the anatomic regions captured in a CBCT volume and those common abnormalities that must be referred.

Purpose: Foretinib is an oral multikinase inhibitor targeting Met, RON, Axl, and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor. We conducted a phase I, first-time-in-human, clinical trial using escalating doses of oral foretinib. The primary objectives are to identify a maximum tolerated dose and determine the safety profile of foretinib. Secondary objectives included evaluation of plasma pharmacokinetics, long-term safety after repeated administration, preliminary antitumor activity, and pharmacodynamic activity. Experimental Design: Patients had histologically confirmed metastatic or unresectable solid tumors for which no standard measures exist. All patients received foretinib orally for 5 consecutive days every 14 days. Dose escalation followed a conventional “3+3” design. Results: Forty patients were treated in eight dose cohorts. The maximum tolerated dose was defined as 3.6 mg/kg, with a maximum administered dose of 4.5 mg/kg. Dose-limiting toxicities included grade 3 elevations in aspartate aminotransferase and lipase. Additional non–dose-limiting adverse events included hypertension, fatigue, diarrhea, vomiting, proteinuria, and hematuria. Responses were observed in two patients with papillary renal cell cancer and one patient with medullary thyroid cancer. Stable disease was identified in 22 patients. Foretinib pharmacokinetics increased linearly with dose. Pharmacodynamic evaluation indicated inhibition of MET phosphorylation and decreased proliferation in select tumor biopsies at submaximal doses. Conclusions: The recommended dose of foretinib was determined to be 240 mg, given on the first 5 days of a 14-day cycle. This dose and schedule were identified as having acceptable safety and pharmacokinetics, and will be the dose used in subsequent phase II trials. Clin Cancer Res; 16(13); 3507–16. ©2010 AACR.

Although digital x-ray adoption has been slow over the 20 years since its introduction, cone beam volumetric imaging (CBVI) or cone beam volumetric tomography (CBVT) has been employed very rapidly. Dentists will not replace all panoramic or intraoral procedures with CBVT, but the images and image data produced by this modality will help dentists perform many dental tasks more efficiently and confidently, tasks such as implant site assessment, visualizing temporomandibular joint structures and impaction problems among others. In short, dentistry, like medicine, will select the appropriate imaging modality for a specific diagnostic task—instead of trying to make one modality fit all tasks. Images and data sets will be moved between clinicians and laboratories rapidly and efficiently for diagnosis, second opinion, and even model and surgical guide construction as well as orthodontic models. Orthodontic analyses will eventually be performed with more accuracy in three-dimensional (3D) and 4D formats. This article attempts to predict in a limited way some of the imaging "standards of care" that will arise from the latest advancements in imaging and inform the reader of some issues yet to be resolved.

The use of conebeam computed tomography (CBCT) carries with it medicolegal risks of which the practitioner should be aware. These include licensing and malpractice liability concerns. A practitioner who intends to take and/or use CBCT scans should seek advice from his malpractice carrier before doing so. All scans should be read by someone competent to interpret them. Using the services of an out-of-state radiologist to read scans poses its own set of risks. Consultation with a malpractice carrier and dental boards is advisable in this situation.

2565Background: PopPK and ER models were developed to characterize the C concentration-time profile and the relationship between C exposure and efficacy endpoints in pts with RCC. Methods: The PopP...

Foretinib is an oral multi-kinase inhibitor targeting MET, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-2, RON, KIT, and AXL kinases. In this Phase 1, open-label, non-randomized study, foretinib was administered once daily at doses of 60 mg, 80 mg, 100 mg, or 120 mg for 28 days. The primary objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and assess the safety and tolerability of the daily oral administration schedule. Secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and assessment of tumor response. Patients had histologically confirmed metastatic or unresectable solid tumors for which no standard treatments existed and all received oral foretinib once daily. Dose escalation was planned as a conventional "3+3" design with an expansion at the MTD for collection of additional safety and pharmacokinetic information. Thirty-seven patients were treated across four dose levels. The MTD was established as 80 mg foretinib. Dose-limiting toxicities were hypertension, dehydration, and diarrhea. The most common adverse events included fatigue, hypertension, nausea, and diarrhea. Twenty-three of 31 patients (74 %) had a best response of stable disease. No patient had a confirmed partial or complete response. At the MTD, steady state was achieved by approximately 2 weeks, with average post-dose time to maximum concentration, peak concentration, and trough concentration of 4 h, 46 ng/mL, and 24 ng/mL, respectively. In patients treated at the MTD, soluble MET and VEGF-A plasma levels significantly increased (P

The purpose of this study was to determine clinical variables affecting motexafin gadolinium (MGd) pharmacokinetics. Motexafin gadolinium (4-5.3 mg/kg/d) was administered intravenously for 2 to 6.5 weeks. Plasma samples from 3 clinical trials were analyzed for MGd using liquid chromatography/mass spectroscopy. The pooled data were analyzed using population pharmacokinetic (POP-PK) methods. The POP-PK model included 243 patients (1575 samples). Clearance (CL) was 14% lower in women, but weight-normalized clearance was only 5% lower in women. Clearance decreased with increasing alkaline phosphatase, increasing age, and decreasing hemoglobin. Administration of phenytoin increased CL by approximately 30%. Central compartment volume (V1) was 21% lower in women and increased with increasing serum creatinine. For all covariates, except sex and phenytoin, the predicted change in CL or V1 (5th and 95th percentiles) varied < or =13% from the population mean CL or V1 estimate. It was concluded that a 3-compartment, open, POP-PK model predicts small but significant effects of age, sex, alkaline phosphatase, hemoglobin, serum creatinine, and phenytoin on MGd pharmacokinetics.

Background Cabozantinib (cabo) is a potent oral therapy that inhibits MET, VEGFR2, and RET. In a phase 1 study, cabo demonstrated anti-tumor activity in patients with MTC, and a long terminal half-life of 120 hours. We report clinical activity and PK analyses from a Phase 3 study of cabo versus placebo (P) in patients with progressive, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic MTC. Methods Patients with MTC and documented RECIST progression within 14 months (mo) of screening were randomized 2:1 to receive cabo (140 mg freebase qd, n = 219) or placebo (n = 111). Blood samples for PK were collected on days 1 and 29. Baseline tumor and blood samples were evaluated for RET mutation status. Tumor assessments occurred every 12 weeks, and the primary efficacy measure was progression-free survival (PFS), assessed by an independent radiology committee using RECIST. Results Statistically significant PFS prolongation was observed, with median PFS for cabo of 11.2 mo versus 4.0 mo for P (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.19-0.40, p Conclusions Cabo significantly prolonged PFS compared to placebo in a patient population with progressive MTC. PK analysis supports administration of cabo as a fixed dose without adjustment for patient covariates. Disclosure M.J. Schlumberger: MJ Schlumberger has been a compensated consultant for Exelixis. M. Brose: Dr. Brose has received research funding and honoraria from Exelixis. M. Shah: Dr. Shah has received research funding from Exelixis. D.R. Miles: D. Miles is an employee and stockholder of Exelixis. L.T. Nguyen: Linh Nguyen is an employee and stockholder in Exelixis. S. Sherman: Dr. Sherman is a compensated consultant to Exelixis. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

4504 Background: Cabozantinib (cabo) is an oral, potent inhibitor of MET and VEGFR2 that is currently undergoing evaluation in several oncology indications. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was chosen as an indication in this drug-drug interaction (DDI) study based on involvement of the MET and VEGFR signaling pathways in this disease. The primary objective of this study is to determine the effect of cabo on single dose PK of the CYP2C8 substrate rosiglitazone (rosi). Anti-tumor activity was also evaluated. Methods: Eligible pts were required to have RCC with clear cell components with metastases, Karnofsky performance status of ≥70 and measurable disease by RECIST. Pts needed to have experienced PD following standard therapies. Cabo was given daily at a dose of 140 mg free base (equivalent to 175 mg salt form) starting at Day 2. Rosi (4 mg) was given Day 1 and Day 22 to complete PK assessment for DDI. Cabo was continued until PD. On Day 57 and every 8 weeks thereafter subjects underwent tumor assessments by mRECIST. Results: Enrollment is complete at 25 RCC pts; 17/25 (64%) RCC pts had received ≥ 2 prior agents; 13/25 (52%) with at least 1 VEGF pathway inhibitor and 1 mTOR inhibitor. The majority of pts were in an intermediate (21/25) or poor (3/25) prognostic category (1/25 in favorable category) per Heng et al (JCO, 2009, v27, p5794). ORR by mRECIST: 7/25 (28%). Disease control rate (PR + SD): 72% at 16 weeks; 19/21 (90%) pts with ≥1 post-baseline scan experienced tumor regression (range: 4 - 63% reduction in measurements). 10/25 (36%) pts remain on cabo. Median PFS is 14.7 months (95% CI: 7.3, upper limit not reached) with a median follow-up of 7.7 months. AEs ≥ Grade 3 severity: hypophosphatemia (36%), hyponatremia (20%), and fatigue (16%). PK data suggest that clinically relevant doses of cabo do not alter the Cmax or AUC0-24h of rosi, consistent with no inhibition of CYP2C8. Conclusions: Cabo demonstrates encouraging anti-tumor activity in heavily pretreated RCC pts with a toxicity profile similar to that of other VEGFR TKIs. PK data suggest no DDI between cabo and rosi (CYP2C8 substrate).

5547 Background: Cabozantinib (cabo) is an oral, potent inhibitor of MET, VEGFR2, and RET that is currently undergoing evaluation in several oncology indications. Differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) pts were included in this study based on involvement of the MET, VEGFR, and RET signaling pathways in this disease. The primary objective of this study is to determine the effect of cabo on single dose PK of the CYP2C8 substrate rosiglitazone (rosi). Anti-tumor activity and safety were also evaluated. Methods: Metastatic DTC pts who were enrolled to this study were required to be RAI-refractory, have progressed on standard therapies and have measurable disease. Cabo was given daily at a dose of 140 mg free base (equivalent to 175mg salt form) starting at Day 2. Rosi (4mg) was given Day 1 and Day 22 to complete PK assessment for drug-drug interaction (DDI). Cabo was continued until PD. On Day 57 and every 8 weeks thereafter subjects underwent tumor assessments by mRECIST. Results: 15 DTC pts were enrolled. Median number of prior regimens was 2 (11/15 pts had at least 1 prior VEGFR inhibitor). 8/15 pts (53%) had confirmed PRs including 1 pt with marked improvement of a bone infiltrating lesion; 6 (40%) had best response of SD; all 14 pts with ≥1 post-baseline scan experienced tumor regression (range: -9 to -55%). Disease control rate (PR + SD): 80% at 16 weeks; 10/15 (67%) remain on cabo with a median follow-up of 7.3 months. Median PFS and OS have not been reached. Most common Gr 3/4 AEs were: diarrhea (20%), lipase increased (20%), hypertension (13%) and palmar-plantar erythrodyesthesia (13%); one related Gr 5 event reported: hemoptysis due to aorto-trachael fistula in a pt with history of prior mediastinal XRT and extensive neck surgeries. PK data suggest that clinically relevant doses of cabo do not alter the Cmax or AUC0-24h of rosi, consistent with no inhibition of CYP2C8. Conclusions: In pts with DTC, cabo treatment resulted in substantial anti-tumor activity. The safety profile of cabo was comparable to that seen with other VEGFR TKIs. PK data suggest no DDI between cabo and rosi (CYP2C8 substrate).

Foretinib is a potent, orally available, small-molecule inhibitor of MET and VEGFR2. Significant tumor cell growth inhibition was observed preclinically following treatment in multiple tumor models. Antitumor activity was observed in a previous phase I study in which foretinib was dosed intermittently on days 1–5 every 14 days. This phase I dose-escalation study to evaluate daily oral administration of foretinib was conducted in adults with solid tumors. Foretinib was orally administered until disease progression or toxicity mandated removal from the study. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) that occurred during the first 28 days of treatment were used to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics (PD), and pharmacokinetics (PK) were evaluated. Tumor volume was assessed every 8 weeks by RECIST. A total of 37 patients (pts) were treated across 4 dose levels in the following order: 60 mg/d (6 pts), 80 mg/d (12 pts), 120 mg/d (3 pts), 100 mg/d (3 pts), and 80 mg/d (13 pts, PK expansion). Reported DLTs were hypertension and dehydration at 120 mg/d and diarrhea at 100 mg/d. The MTD of foretinib was determined to be 80 mg. With chronic dosing, 12 of 25 pts (48%) on 80 mg required a dose reduction to 60 mg between 21 days and 4 months on treatment. Frequent AEs associated with foretinib were hypertension (62%), fatigue (51%), nausea (43%), diarrhea (41%), proteinuria (30%), increased lactate dehydrogenase (27%), vomiting (24%), anorexia (22%), increased aspartate transaminase (19%), rash (16%), increased GGT (16%), and increased lipase (16%), primarily CTCAE grades 1 and 2. The foretinib plasma PK (at MTD) was characterized by a tmax of ≈4 hours, a steady-state oral clearance (CL/F) of ≈83 L/h, and ≈3.8-fold accumulation at steady state (achieved by ≈day 15). At steady state, values of Cmax and AUC0–24 were ≈45.7 ng/mL and ≈805 h · ng/mL, respectively, and the Cmin was ≈52% of Cmax. Plasma PD markers were measured during cycle 1 in 19 pts treated at the MTD. Shed Met (sMET) and VEGF showed increases, whereas sVEGFR2 showed a decrease. No pts had confirmed partial response or complete response, but stable disease (SD) (range, 2.1–18.1 months) was seen in 23 pts (74.2%). 11 pts had tumor regression from baseline, with tumor shrinkage ranging from 1%–21%. Disease progression was seen in 8 pts (25.8%). Overall, 35.5% of pts were event-free at 6 months, and 12.9% of pts (diagnoses included medullary thyroid, hepatocellular, and papillary renal cell carcinomas, and alveolar soft part sarcoma) were event-free at 12 months. 62% percent of pts withdrew due to progressive disease, 8% due to AEs, 5% due to death, and 24% due to consent withdrawal/investigator discretion/other. Foretinib can be safely administered at the oral daily dose of 80 mg (MTD); however, with chronic administration, dose reductions were not uncommon. The safety profile observed with daily dosing of foretinib is similar to that seen with intermittent dosing. Plasma PK results indicate that exposure to foretinib was well maintained over the daily dosing interval. PD results are similar to that seen with intermittent dosing and indicate that sMET, VEGF, and sVEGFR2 are promising markers for monitoring biological activity of foretinib. Prolonged SD and tumor regression in pts with various cancers suggest that foretinib has promise as an anticancer therapy. Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8(12 Suppl):A8.

Seven cases of facial artery calcification are reported and their panoramic radiographic appearance is illustrated. Facial artery calcification as an early manifestation of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is discussed.