Search

Highlights • Intensification of chemoradiation with hyperthermia was feasible in nine patients with LAPC. • Only one grade three toxicity was reported and two tumours became resectable. • The 24 months median OS and 100% 1 year OS are superior to historical series., Introduction Driven by the current unsatisfactory outcomes for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), a biologically intensified clinical protocol was developed to explore the feasibility and efficacy of FOLFORINOX chemotherapy followed by deep hyperthermia concomitant with chemoradiation and subsequent FOLFORINOX chemotherapy in patients with LAPC. Methods Nine patients with LAPC were treated according to the HEATPAC Phase II trial protocol which consists of 4 cycles of FOLFORINOX chemotherapy followed by gemcitabine-based chemoradiation to 56 Gy combined with weekly deep hyperthermia and then a further 8 cycles of FOLFORINOX chemotherapy. Results One grade three related toxicity was reported and two tumours became resectable. The median overall survival was 24 months and 1 year overall survival was 100%. Conclusions Intensification of chemoradiation with deep hyperthermia was feasible in nine consecutive patients with LAPC.

Several functional parameters from baseline (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography have been proposed as promising biomarkers of treatment efficacy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We tested their ability to predict outcome in 2 cohorts of DLBCL patients receiving conventional immunochemotherapy (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin hydrochloride, vincristine sulfate, and prednisone [R-CHOP] regimen), either every 14 (R-CHOP14) or 21 days (R-CHOP21). Baseline PET analysis was performed in 141 patients with DLBCL treated with R-CHOP14 in the prospective SAKK38/07 study (NCT00544219) of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (testing set). Reproducibility was examined in a validation set of 113 patients treated with R-CHOP21. In the SAKK38/07 cohort, progression-free survival (PFS) at 5 years was 83% for patients with low metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and 59% for those with high MTV (hazard ratio [HR], 3.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-7.0; P = .0005), whereas overall survival (OS) was 91% and 64%, respectively (HR, 4.4; 95% CI, 1.9-10; P = .0001). MTV was the most powerful predictor of outcome also in the validation set. Elevated metabolic heterogeneity (MH) significantly predicted poorer outcomes in the subgroups of patients with elevated MTV. A model integrating MTV and MH identified high-risk patients with shorter PFS (testing set: HR, 5.6; 95% CI, 1.8-17; P < .0001; validation set: HR, 5.6; 95% CI, 1.7-18; P = .0002) and shorter OS (testing set: HR, 9.5; 95% CI, 1.7-52; P < .0001; validation set: HR, 7.6; 95% CI, 2.0-28; P = .0003). This finding was confirmed by an unsupervised regression tree analysis indicating that prognostic models based on MTV and MH may allow early identification of refractory patients who might benefit from treatment intensification. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00544219.

Functional parameters from positron emission tomography (PET) seem promising biomarkers in various lymphoma subtypes. This study investigated the prognostic value of PET radiomics in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients treated with R-CHOP given either every 14 (testing set) or 21 days (validation set). Using the PyRadiomics Python package, 107 radiomics features were extracted from baseline PET scans of 133 patients enrolled in the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research 38/07 prospective clinical trial (SAKK 38/07) [ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT00544219]. The international prognostic indices, the main clinical parameters and standard PET metrics, together with 52 radiomics uncorrelated features (selected using the Spearman correlation test) were included in a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression to assess their impact on progression-free (PFS), cause-specific (CSS), and overall survival (OS). A linear combination of the resulting parameters generated a prognostic radiomics score (RS) whose area under the curve (AUC) was calculated by receiver operating characteristic analysis. The RS efficacy was validated in an independent cohort of 107 DLBCL patients. LASSO Cox regression identified four radiomics features predicting PFS in SAKK 38/07. The derived RS showed a significant capability to foresee PFS in both testing (AUC, 0.709; p

Background The impact of HER2-targeted therapy alone followed by the addition of chemotherapy at disease progression (PD) versus upfront combination was investigated by the SAKK 22/99 trial. The aim of this exploratory analysis of the SAKK 22/99 trial was to characterize the specific subset of patients deriving long-term benefit from trastuzumab monotherapy alone and to identify potential predictive factors of long-term response. Methods This is an unplanned post-hoc analysis of patients randomized to Arm A (trastuzumab monotherapy). Patients were divided in two groups: patients with durable clinical benefit from trastuzumab monotherapy and short-term responders without durable clinical benefit from trastuzumab monotherapy Univariate and multivariate analyses of clinical characteristics correlating with response duration was performed. Results Eighty six patients were randomized in arm A, 24 patients (28%) were long-term responders and 62 (72%) were short-term responders with a 5y-overall survival (OS) of 54% (95% CI 31–72) and of 18% (95%CI 10–30), respectively. Absence of ER expression, absence of PgR expression and presence of visceral disease emerged as possible negative predictive factors for durable clinical benefit. Conclusion Durable clinical benefit can be achieved with trastuzumab monotherapy in a subgroup of HER2-positive patients with advanced disease and it is predictive for longer OS. Further investigations of predictive biomarkers are necessary to better characterize this subgroup of patients and develop further de-escalating strategies. Trial registration NCT00004935; first posted 27.01.2003, retrospectively registered.

Gliomas are intrinsic brain tumours, which are classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) into different grades of malignancy, with glioblastoma being the most frequent and most malignant subtype (WHO grade IV). Mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1 or 2 genes are frequent in lower (WHO II/III) grade tumours but typically absent in classical glioblastoma. IDH mutations are associated with a better prognosis compared with IDH wild-type tumours of the same WHO grade. Following detection of a tumour mass by imaging, maximum safe surgery as feasible is commonly performed to reduce mass effect and to obtain tissue allowing histopathological diagnosis and molecular assessment. Radiotherapy has been the mainstay in the treatment of diffuse gliomas for several decades. It provides improved local control, but is not curative. Furthermore, several randomised trials have shown that the addition of alkylating chemotherapy, either temozolomide or nitrosourea-based regimens, to radiotherapy results in prolonged survival. Tumour-treating fields (TTFields) have emerged as an additional treatment option in combination with maintenance temozolomide treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Treatment at recurrence is less standardised and depends on the patient’s performance status, symptom burden and prior treatments. Bevacizumab prolongs progression-free survival in newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma, but does not impact overall survival. However, in Switzerland and some other countries, it is still considered a valuable treatment option to reduce clinical symptom burden. Given the generally poor outcome for these patients, various novel treatment approaches are currently being explored within clinical trials including immunotherapeutic strategies such as immune checkpoint inhibition and the brain-penetrant proteasome inhibitor marizomib.

Pancreatic cancer has a dismal prognosis with 5-year overall survival rate of around 5%. Although surgery is still the best option in operable cases, majority of the patients who present in locally advanced stages are deemed inoperable. Novel approaches are therefore needed for the management of around 80% of these inoperable locally advanced pancreatic cancers (LAPC). Hyperthermia (39–43 °C) is a potent radiosensitizer and further enhances the action of gemcitabine, also a known radiosensitizer. Thus through triple sensitization, a combination of hyperthermia, radiotherapy and gemcitabine could be expected to improve the therapeutic outcomes in LAPC. This phase II randomized trial, HEATPAC in unresectable LAPC, explores the feasibility and efficacy of concurrent thermochemoradiotherapy (HTCTRT) over chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) alone with pre- and post-intervention FOLFIRINOX at standard dosage and schedule. Following 4 cycles of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX, patients with no metastasis and absence of gross peritoneal carcinomatosis would be randomized to either (a) control arm: concurrent CTRT with gemcitabine (400 mg/m2, weekly ×6) or (b) study arm: locoregional hyperthermia (weekly ×6 during radiotherapy) with concurrent CTRT (same as in control arm). All patients would receive simultaneous-integrated boost intensity-modulated radiation therapy to doses of 56Gy and 50.4Gy to the gross and clinical target volumes respectively delivered in 28 fractions over 5.5 weeks. Deep locoregional hyperthermia would be administered weekly and monitored with real-time intraduodenal multisensor thermometry probe. A temperature of 40–43 °C for 60 min would be aimed for each hyperthermia session. On completion of CTRT/HTCTRT, patients of both groups would receive an additional 8 cycles of FOLFIRINOX. The expected 1-year baseline overall survival with CTRT alone is considered as 40%. With HTCTRT, a survival advantage of +20% is expected. Considering α = 0.05 and β = 0.80 for sample size computation, a total of 86 patients would be equally randomized into the two treatment groups. This phase II study if found to be safe and effective, would form the basis of a future phase III randomized study. The trial has been registered with the ( NCT02439593 ). The study has been approved by the Ethical Commissions of Basel and Zurich and is open for patient recruitment.

Background/purpose Recently, the mutational background of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has been revealed, identifying specific genetic events that drive lymphomagenesis. However, the prognostic value of these mutations remains to be determined. Prognostic biomarkers in DLBCL are urgently needed, since the current clinical parameter-based factors (e.g., International Prognostic Index (IPI)) are insufficient, particularly in identifying patients with poor prognosis who might benefit from alternative treatments. Methods We investigated the prognostic value of somatic mutations in DLBCL in a clinical trial (NCT00544219) patient cohort homogenously treated with six cycles of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP), followed by two cycles of R (R-CHOP-14). The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS) at 2 years. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Targeted high-throughput sequencing (HTS) of tumor genomic DNA was performed on all exons or hotspots of 68 genes frequently mutated in B cell lymphomas. Mutational data was correlated with the endpoints to identify prognostic associations. Results Targeted HTS detected somatic mutations in 71/76 (93%) of investigated cases. The most frequently mutated genes were KMT2D, SOCS1, GNA13, and B2M. Survival analysis revealed that CREBBP- and EP300-mutated cases had significantly worse OS, PFS, and EFS. In addition, ATM mutations predicted worse outcomes for all three clinical endpoints in germinal center B cell-like DLBCL. In contrast, SOCS1 mutations were associated with better PFS. On multivariable analysis taken into account IPI and failure to achieve complete remission, CREBBP and EP300 mutations remained significant to predict worse OS, PFS, and EFS. Conclusion Targeted mutation analysis of a uniformly treated prospective clinical trial DLBCL cohort identifies tumor-based genetic prognostic markers that could be useful in the clinical management of such patients. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00544219 Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13045-017-0438-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Summary Background Postoperative hemithoracic radiotherapy has been used to treat malignant pleural mesothelioma, but it has not been assessed in a randomised trial. We assessed high-dose hemithoracic radiotherapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and extrapleural pneumonectomy in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Methods We did this phase 2 trial in two parts at 14 hospitals in Switzerland, Belgium, and Germany. We enrolled patients with pathologically confirmed malignant pleural mesothelioma; resectable TNM stages T1–3 N0–2, M0; WHO performance status 0–1; age 18–70 years. In part 1, patients were given three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (cisplatin 75 mg/m 2 and pemetrexed 500 mg/m 2 on day 1 given every 3 weeks) and extrapleural pneumonectomy; the primary endpoint was complete macroscopic resection (R0–1). In part 2, participants with complete macroscopic resection were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive high-dose radiotherapy or not. The target volume for radiotherapy encompassed the entire hemithorax, the thoracotomy channel, and mediastinal nodal stations if affected by the disease or violated surgically. A boost was given to areas at high risk for locoregional relapse. The allocation was stratified by centre, histology (sarcomatoid vs epithelioid or mixed), mediastinal lymph node involvement (N0–1 vs N2), and T stage (T1–2 vs T3). The primary endpoint of part 1 was the proportion of patients achieving complete macroscopic resection (R0 and R1). The primary endpoint in part 2 was locoregional relapse-free survival, analysed by intention to treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00334594. Findings We enrolled patients between Dec 7, 2005, and Oct 17, 2012. Overall, we analysed 151 patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, of whom 113 (75%) had extrapleural pneumonectomy. Median follow-up was 54·2 months (IQR 32–66). 52 (34%) of 151 patients achieved an objective response. The most common grade 3 or 4 toxic effects were neutropenia (21 [14%] of 151 patients), anaemia (11 [7%]), and nausea or vomiting (eight [5%]). 113 patients had extrapleural pneumonectomy, with complete macroscopic resection achieved in 96 (64%) of 151 patients. We enrolled 54 patients in part 2; 27 in each group. The main reasons for exclusion were patient refusal (n=20) and ineligibility (n=10). 25 of 27 patients completed radiotherapy. Median total radiotherapy dose was 55·9 Gy (IQR 46·8–56·0). Median locoregional relapse-free survival from surgery, was 7·6 months (95% CI 4·5–10·7) in the no radiotherapy group and 9·4 months (6·5–11·9) in the radiotherapy group. The most common grade 3 or higher toxic effects related to radiotherapy were nausea or vomiting (three [11%] of 27 patients), oesophagitis (two [7%]), and pneumonitis (two [7%]). One patient died of pneumonitis. We recorded no toxic effects data for the control group. Interpretation Our findings do not support the routine use of hemithoracic radiotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and extrapleural pneumonectomy. Funding Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation, Eli Lilly.

Summary Background Rindopepimut (also known as CDX-110), a vaccine targeting the EGFR deletion mutation EGFRvIII, consists of an EGFRvIII-specific peptide conjugated to keyhole limpet haemocyanin. In the ACT IV study, we aimed to assess whether or not the addition of rindopepimut to standard chemotherapy is able to improve survival in patients with EGFRvIII-positive glioblastoma. Methods In this randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial, we recruited patients aged 18 years and older with glioblastoma from 165 hospitals in 22 countries. Eligible patients had newly diagnosed glioblastoma confirmed to express EGFRvIII by central analysis, and had undergone maximal surgical resection and completion of standard chemoradiation without progression. Patients were stratified by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer recursive partitioning analysis class, MGMT promoter methylation, and geographical region, and randomly assigned (1:1) with a prespecified randomisation sequence (block size of four) to receive rindopepimut (500 μg admixed with 150 μg GM-CSF) or control (100 μg keyhole limpet haemocyanin) via monthly intradermal injection until progression or intolerance, concurrent with standard oral temozolomide (150–200 mg/m 2 for 5 of 28 days) for 6–12 cycles or longer. Patients, investigators, and the trial funder were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was overall survival in patients with minimal residual disease (MRD; enhancing tumour 2 post-chemoradiation by central review), analysed by modified intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01480479. Findings Between April 12, 2012, and Dec 15, 2014, 745 patients were enrolled (405 with MRD, 338 with significant residual disease [SRD], and two unevaluable) and randomly assigned to rindopepimut and temozolomide (n=371) or control and temozolomide (n=374). The study was terminated for futility after a preplanned interim analysis. At final analysis, there was no significant difference in overall survival for patients with MRD: median overall survival was 20·1 months (95% CI 18·5–22·1) in the rindopepimut group versus 20·0 months (18·1–21·9) in the control group (HR 1·01, 95% CI 0·79–1·30; p=0·93). The most common grade 3–4 adverse events for all 369 treated patients in the rindopepimut group versus 372 treated patients in the control group were: thrombocytopenia (32 [9%] vs 23 [6%]), fatigue (six [2%] vs 19 [5%]), brain oedema (eight [2%] vs 11 [3%]), seizure (nine [2%] vs eight [2%]), and headache (six [2%] vs ten [3%]). Serious adverse events included seizure (18 [5%] vs 22 [6%]) and brain oedema (seven [2%] vs 12 [3%]). 16 deaths in the study were caused by adverse events (nine [4%] in the rindopepimut group and seven [3%] in the control group), of which one—a pulmonary embolism in a 64-year-old male patient after 11 months of treatment—was assessed as potentially related to rindopepimut. Interpretation Rindopepimut did not increase survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Combination approaches potentially including rindopepimut might be required to show efficacy of immunotherapy in glioblastoma. Funding Celldex Therapeutics, Inc.

Background Second line endocrine therapy has limited antitumour activity. Fulvestrant inhibits and downregulates the oestrogen receptor. The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway is one of the major cascades involved in resistance to endocrine therapy. We assessed the efficacy and safety of fulvestrant with selumetinib, a MEK 1/2 inhibitor, in advanced stage breast cancer progressing after aromatase inhibitor (AI). Patients and methods This randomised phase II trial included postmenopausal patients with endocrine-sensitive breast cancer. They were ramdomised to fulvestrant combined with selumetinib or placebo. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR) in the experimental arm. ClinicalTrials.gov Indentifier: NCT01160718. Results Following the planned interim efficacy analysis, recruitment was interrupted after the inclusion of 46 patients (23 in each arm), because the selumetinib–fulvestrant arm did not reach the pre-specified DCR. DCR was 23% (95% confidence interval (CI) 8–45%) in the selumetinib arm and 50% (95% CI 27–75%) in the placebo arm. Median progression-free survival was 3.7 months (95% CI 1.9–5.8) in the selumetinib arm and 5.6 months (95% CI 3.4–13.6) in the placebo arm. Median time to treatment failure was 5.1 (95% CI 2.3–6.7) and 5.6 (95% CI 3.4–10.2) months, respectively. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events observed in the selumetinib–fulvestrant arm were skin disorders, fatigue, nausea/vomiting, oedema, diarrhoea, mouth disorders and muscle disorders. Conclusions The addition of selumetinib to fulvestrant did not show improving patients’ outcome and was poorly tolerated at the recommended monotherapy dose. Selumetinib may have deteriorated the efficacy of the endocrine therapy in some patients.

In advanced HER2+ breast cancer the impact of combining Trastuzumab (T) and chemotherapy (chemo) versus T alone followed by the addition of chemo at disease progression has not been properly studied. Study design The trial compared efficacy, toxicity and quality of life of sequential administration of T followed, at progression, by combination with chemo (T>TChemo) versus the upfront combination of T and chemo (TChemo) in patients with HER2+ advanced breast cancer. Materials and methods Eligibility: measurable/evaluable HER2+ advanced disease; ≤2 previous chemo; ECOG performance status The estimated median TTP-TChemo in the control arm (TChemo) was 5-6 months. A 3 months’ increase in the experimental T>TChemo arm was considered meaningful. The chemo backbone was at investigator’s choice (taxanes, vinorelbine, cisplatin) and could be stopped after 6 cycles in responding patients. T was continued until progression. Treatment after progression under TChemo was by investigators’ decision. Patients’ characteristics From Sept 1999–Jan 2013, 175 patients were enrolled. The trial was stopped prematurely due to insufficient accrual. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between arms: median age 55 years (32–79), ER and/or progesterone receptor positive 63%, ≥2 disease sites 91%, dominant bone 36% or dominant visceral disease 66%, 1stline therapy 72%. Results At the cutoff date (May 2014) 173 patients were evaluable: median follow up 77.7 months, 29 patients (17%) censored when receiving, at chemo stop, off-protocol treatment before progression (maintenance metronomic chemotherapy or endocrine therapy), 11 patients (6%) had no event at the end of follow-up. TTP-TChemo was longer than expected in both arms (12.7 months T>TChemo, 10.3 months TChemo) and not significantly different (HR=0.7; 95% CI, 0.5–1.0; p=0.08). In the T>TChemo arm, median TTP before introduction of chemo was 3.7 months (95% CI 2.3–5.1). Overall survival was not significantly different, 35.6 months versus 36.3 months (HR=0.9; 95% CI, 0.6–1.3; p=0.50). Toxicity was mainly chemo related, consistent with the chosen regimen. Cardiac toxicity was mild (no grade 4, 1 cardiac failure NYHA III in the T>TChemo arm). No treatment-related death was reported. Conclusions The sequential administration of T and chemo showed a non-significant trend to longer TTP-TChemo compared to upfront combination therapy: it allows to delay chemo use and its toxicity and seems a reasonable approach. TTP-TChemo was better than projected in both arms. The sequential strategy with double anti-HER2 targeting (T/Pertuzumab) is now under evaluation in 1st-line patients in the SAKK 22/10 trial. Citation Format: Olivia Pagani, Dirk Klingbiel, Thomas Ruhstaller, Franco Nolè, Serenella Eppenberger, Christian Oehlschlegel, Jürg Bernhard, Peter Brauchli, Dagmar Hess, Christoph Mamot, Elisabetta Munzone, Bernhard Pestalozzi, Manuela Rabaglio, Karin Ribi, Christoph Rochlitz, Karin Rothgiesser, Beat Thürlimann, Roger von Moos, Khalil Zaman, Aron Goldhirsch. Advanced HER2 positive breast cancer treated with trastuzumab: Is combination with chemotherapy always needed? Randomized phase III trial SAKK 22/99 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-15-11.

Background HER2-targeted therapy plus chemotherapy is standard treatment in advanced HER2+ breast cancer. Trastuzumab alone followed by addition of chemotherapy at disease progression versus upfront combination therapy has not been elucidated. Patients and methods One-hundred seventy-five patients with measurable/evaluable HER2+ advanced disease without previous HER2-directed therapy were randomized to trastuzumab alone followed, at disease progression, by the combination with chemotherapy (Arm A) or upfront trastuzumab plus chemotherapy (Arm B). Chemotherapy could be stopped after ≥6 cycles in responding patients, trastuzumab was continued until progression. The primary endpoint of this superiority trial was time to progression (TTP) on combined trastuzumab-chemotherapy (Combination-TTP) in both arms. Secondary endpoints included response rate, TTP, overall survival, quality of life and toxicity. Results Combination-TTP was longer than expected in both arms, 12.2 months in Arm A and 10.3 months in Arm B and not significantly different (hazard ratio [HR] 0.7; 95% CI 0.5-1.1; P =0.1). Overall survival was also not significantly different (HR 0.9; 95% CI 0.6-1.5; P = 0.55). In Arm A, the median TTP before introduction of chemotherapy was 3.7 months (95% CI 2.3-5.4), yet at 2 years 6% of patients were still on trastuzumab alone. Patients without visceral disease had a Combination-TTP of 21.8 months in arm A, compared with 10.1 months in arm B (unplanned analysis HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.1-4.2, P = 0.03). Patients with visceral disease showed no difference. Toxicity was chemotherapy-related. Conclusion The outcome of patients receiving sequential trastuzumab-chemotherapy or upfront combination was similar. We failed to demonstrate superiority of the sequential approach. These results nevertheless suggest chemotherapy and its toxicity can be deferred, especially in patients with indolent, non-visceral disease. Despite a larger non-inferiority confirmatory study would be needed, these findings represent an additional proof of concept that de-escalation strategies can be discussed in individual patients.

Background: Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway is one of the major signaling cascades responsible for resistance to endocrine therapy by promoting estrogen-independent tumor growth. Sel is a potent selective MEK1 and MEK2 inhibitor active in melanoma, ovarian, colorectal and non-small cell lung cancers. Fulvestrant (Fulv) is a pure antagonist and downregulator of nuclear and membranous/cytoplasmic estrogen receptor (ER). The combination of a MEK inhibitor with Fulv may improve the efficacy of endocrine therapy by reversing and/or delaying the development of resistance. Material and methods: Postmenopausal patients with advanced stage endocrine-sensitive (ER and/or progesterone receptors ≥10%) breast cancer progressing after aromatase inhibitor were randomized to intramuscular Fulv 500 mg (day 1, 15, 29 then every 28±2 days) combined with either oral Sel 75 mg bid or placebo bid. The primary endpoint was disease control (DC = CR + PR + stable disease ≥ 24 weeks). Sample size was calculated according to Simon's optimal two-stage design. A DC rate of ≤30% in the experimental arm was considered as not interesting and ≥50% as promising. Using a 5% significance level and 80% power, 46 patients were needed, 15 in the first stage and 31 in the second stage. In the control arm a total of 43 patients was needed to estimate the DC rate with a confidence interval width of ≤30%. An interim efficacy analysis was planned according to Herndon's modification of Simon's optimal two-stage design. Results: Forty-six patients were included (23 per arm). Seventy percent of the patients in the experimental arm had measurable disease and 57% had visceral metastases. Patients had received AI in the metastatic (61%) or adjuvant (39%) setting (65% had also prior tamoxifen). Five of 23 patients (22%) reached DC in the experimental arm. DC rate being inferior to the statistical hypothesis the study was terminated following the planned interim efficacy analysis. Most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) were rash and other skin disorders, fatigue, diarrhea, hypertension, edema, nausea/vomiting, anorexia, musculoskeletal symptoms, dry mouth and paresthesia. AEs were mainly grade 1 and 2 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0), but they often precluded treatment continuation. Most of the first patients exposed to Sel 75 mg bid stopped treatment before disease progression. Seven of the 23 patients (30%) were exposed to Sel for only 1 cycle or less. After an amendment facilitating early dose-reduction, patients decreasing to 75 mg qd had much better tolerance and improved treatment duration with Sel. Four out of the 5 patients reaching DC had Sel dose reduction. Conclusion: The combination of Sel with fulvestrant did not reach the prespecified disease control rate. The toxicity of Sel 75 mg bid led to frequent treatment interruptions/dose reductions and poor exposure to the drug. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P2-16-19.

We thank Adams and Kwee for their detailed review of our article and also for their comments. The main objective of this trial was to prospectively determine the prognostic value of interim positron emission tomography (PET) after two cycles of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone every 2 weeks, and we reported that this procedure has only limited value. Additionally, we demonstrated that the best separation of prognosis between PET-positive and PET-negative patients was achieved by the end-of-treatment PET scan. We agree that an event-free survival of 72% at 2 years for PETnegative patients does not indicate a high prognostic value. However, as discussed in our article, the outcome for all patients (PET-positive and PET-negative) seemed disappointing but can be explained by the fact that involved field radiotherapy or high-dose methotrexate as CNS prophylaxis were given to 25 patients regardless of PET results, and this counted as an event per the protocol. Because of a balanced distribution in both groups and the fact that our findings showed no differences when excluding these patients, we decided to report on the end points that were defined in the protocol and were studied prospectively. In further analysis, we also looked at progression-free survival (PFS), where such events were excluded. In this situation, PFS at 2 years exceeded 88% for the patients having a negative PET scan at the end of treatment. At least for these patients, PET negativity at the end of this trial predicted a low risk of disease progression within 2 years. The role of PET imaging in lymphoma patients for staging and response assessment has been studied extensively in the past, and, clearly, this technology has its limitations, such as the detection of microscopic residual disease or bone marrow infiltration. Of course, patients with indolent lymphomas or aggressive lymphomas treated with noncurative chemotherapy can achieve a negative PETresult at the end of treatment. However, inDLBCL, cure ismost often the aim of chemotherapy in this setting, and the PET has been evaluated as a surrogatemarker for this goal. A PFS of 88% after 2 years for patients having a negative PETresult at the end of treatment is in line with the results of other trials in this situation, and to my knowledge, there are not many other predictive parameters that are superior to these findings. In our view,more concerning than the PET-negative results is the relatively high number of false-positive PET results for the interim PET in this trial, as well as for the end-of-treatment PET.

The Ewing sarcoma family of tumors (ESFT) encompasses a group of highly aggressive, morphologically similar, malignant neoplasms sharing a common spontaneous genetic translocation that affect mostly children and young adults. These predominantly characteristic, small round-cell tumors include Ewing’s sarcoma of the bone and soft tissue, as well as primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNETs) involving the bone, soft tissue, and thoracopulmonary region (Askin’s tumor). Extraosseous ESFTs are extremely rare, especially in the head and neck region, where literature to date consists of sporadic case reports and very small series. We hereby present a review of the literature published on ESFTs reported in the maxilla and maxillary sinus region from 1968 to 2016.

DLBL subtypes identified by patterns of gene expression correspond to germinal center (GCB) or activated (ABC) B‐cells like. The latter demonstrate dysregulation of the NF‐KB pathway. Outcomes of treatment with R‐CHOP are inferior for ABC DLBL in retrospective series. This study investigated whether adding bortezomib (B), a putative NF‐KB inhibitor, can reverse this phenotype.

Background: The anti-angiogenic drug, bevacizumab (Bv), is currently used in the treatment of different malignancies including breast cancer. Many angiogenesis-associated molecules are found in the circulation of cancer patients. Until now, there are no prognostic or predictive factors identified in breast cancer patients treated with Bv. We present here the first results of the prospective monitoring of 6 angiogenesis-related molecules in the peripheral blood of breast cancer patients treated with a combination of Bv and PLD in the phase II trial, SAKK 24/06. Methods: Patients were treated with PLD (20 mg/m2) and Bv (10 mg/kg) on days 1 and 15 of each 4-week cycle for a maximum of 6 cycles, followed by Bv monotherapy maintenance (10 mg/m2 q2 weeks) until progression or severe toxicity. Plasma and serum samples were collected at baseline, after 2 months of therapy, then every 3 months and at treatment discontinuation. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (Quantikine, R&D Systems and Reliatech) were used to measure the expression levels of human vascular endothelial growth factor (hVEGF), placental growth factor (hPlGF), matrix metalloproteinase 9 (hMMP9) and soluble VEGF receptors hsVEGFR-1, hsVEGFR-2 and hsVEGFR-3. The log-transformed data (to reduce the skewness) for each marker was analyzed using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) model to determine if there was a difference between the mean of the subgroups of interest (where α = 0.05). The untransformed data was also analyzed in the same manner as a “sensitivity” check. Results: 132 blood samples were collected in 41 out of 43 enrolled patients. Baseline levels of the molecules were compared to disease status according to RECIST. There was a statistically significant difference in the mean of the log-transformed levels of hMMP9 between responders [CR+PR] versus the mean in patients with PD (p-value=0.0004, log fold change=0.7536), and between patients with disease control [CR+PR+SD] and those with PD (p-value= Conclusions: Our results suggest that baseline plasma level of the matrix metalloproteinase, hMMP9, could predict tumor response and PFS in patients treated with a combination of Bv and PLD. These data justify further investigation in breast cancer patients treated with anti-angiogenic therapy. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-16-07.

Background The prognostic role of tumor-related parameters in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a matter of controversy. Methods We investigated the prognostic value of phenotypic and genotypic profiles in DLBCL in clinical trial (NCT00544219) patients homogenously treated with six cycles of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (R-CHOP), followed by two cycles of R (R-CHOP-14). The primary endpoint was event-free survival at 2 years (EFS). Secondary endpoints were progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Immunohistochemical (bcl2, bcl6, CD5, CD10, CD20, CD95, CD168, cyclin E, FOXP1, GCET, Ki-67, LMO2, MUM1p, pSTAT3) and in situ hybridization analyses (BCL2 break apart probe, C-MYC break apart probe and C-MYC/IGH double-fusion probe, and Epstein–Barr virus probe) were performed and correlated with the endpoints. Results One hundred twenty-three patients (median age 58 years) were evaluable. Immunohistochemical assessment succeeded in all cases. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was successful in 82 instances. According to the Tally algorithm, 81 cases (66 %) were classified as non-germinal center (GC) DLBCL, while 42 cases (34 %) were GC DLBCL. BCL2 gene breaks were observed in 7/82 cases (9 %) and C-MYC breaks in 6/82 cases (8 %). “Double-hit” cases with BCL2 and C-MYC rearrangements were not observed. Within the median follow-up of 53 months, there were 51 events, including 16 lethal events and 12 relapses. Factors able to predict worse EFS in univariable models were failure to achieve response according to international criteria, failure to achieve positron emission tomography response (p

Summary Background One of the standard options in the treatment of stage IIIA/N2 non-small-cell lung cancer is neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery. We did a randomised trial to investigate whether the addition of neoadjuvant radiotherapy improves outcomes. Methods We enrolled patients in 23 centres in Switzerland, Germany and Serbia. Eligible patients had pathologically proven, stage IIIA/N2 non-small-cell lung cancer and were randomly assigned to treatment groups in a 1:1 ratio. Those in the chemoradiotherapy group received three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (100 mg/m 2 cisplatin and 85 mg/m 2 docetaxel) followed by radiotherapy with 44 Gy in 22 fractions over 3 weeks, and those in the control group received neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. All patients were scheduled to undergo surgery. Randomisation was stratified by centre, mediastinal bulk (less than 5 cm vs 5 cm or more), and weight loss (5% or more vs less than 5% in the previous 6 months). The primary endpoint was event-free survival. Analyses were done by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00030771. Findings From 2001 to 2012, 232 patients were enrolled, of whom 117 were allocated to the chemoradiotherapy group and 115 to the chemotherapy group. Median event-free survival was similar in the two groups at 12·8 months (95% CI 9·7–22·9) in the chemoradiotherapy group and 11·6 months (8·4–15·2) in the chemotherapy group (p=0·67). Median overall survival was 37·1 months (95% CI 22·6–50·0) with radiotherapy, compared with 26·2 months (19·9–52·1) in the control group. Chemotherapy-related toxic effects were reported in most patients, but 91% of patients completed three cycles of chemotherapy. Radiotherapy-induced grade 3 dysphagia was seen in seven (7%) patients. Three patients died in the control group within 30 days after surgery. Interpretation Radiotherapy did not add any benefit to induction chemotherapy followed by surgery. We suggest that one definitive local treatment modality combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy is adequate to treat resectable stage IIIA/N2 non-small-cell lung cancer. Funding Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI), Swiss Cancer League, and Sanofi.

Drug delivery to brain tumors has long posed a major challenge. Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) has been developed as a drug delivery strategy to overcome this difficulty. Ideally, direct visualization of the tissue distribution of drugs infused by CED would assure successful delivery of therapeutic agents to the brain tumor while minimizing exposure of the normal brain. We previously developed a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based method to visualize the distribution of liposomal agents after CED in rodent brains. In the present study, CED of liposomes was further examined in the non-human primate brain (n = 6). Liposomes containing Gadoteridol, DiI-DS, and rhodamine were infused in corona radiata, putamen nucleus, and brain stem. Volume of distribution was analyzed for all delivery locations by histology and MR imaging. Real-time MRI monitoring of liposomes containing gadolinium allowed direct visualization of a robust distribution. MRI of liposomal gadolinium was highly accurate at determining tissue distribution, as confirmed by comparison with histological results from concomitant administration of fluorescent liposomes. Linear correlation for liposomal infusions between infusion volume and distribution volume was established in all targeted locations. We conclude that an integrated strategy combining liposome/nanoparticle technology, CED, and MRI may provide new opportunities for the treatment of brain tumors. Our ability to directly monitor and to control local delivery of liposomal drugs will most likely result in greater clinical efficacy when using CED in management of patients.

Although liposomes have been used as a vehicle for delivery of therapeutic agents in oncology, their efficacy in targeting brain tumors has been limited due to poor penetration through the blood-brain barrier. Because convection-enhanced delivery (CED) of liposomes may improve the therapeutic index for targeting brain tumors, we conducted a three-stage study: stage 1 established the feasibility of using in vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to confirm adequate liposomal distribution within targeted regions in normal rat brain. Liposomes colabeled with gadolinium (Gd) and a fluorescent indicator, 1,1′-dioctadecyl-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethylindocarbocyanine-5,5′-disulfonic acid [DiI-DS; formally DiIC18(3)-DS], were administered by CED into striatal regions. The minimum concentration of Gd needed for monitoring, correlation of infused volume with distribution volume, clearance of infused liposome containing Gd and DiI-DS (Lip/Gd/DiI-DS), and potential local toxicity were evaluated. After determination of adequate conditions for MRI detection in normal brain, stage 2 evaluated the feasibility of in vivo MRI monitoring of liposomal distribution in C6 and 9L-2 rat glioma models. In both models, the distribution of Lip/Gd/DiI-DS covering the tumor mass was well defined and monitored with MRI. Stage 3 was designed to develop a clinically relevant treatment strategy in the 9L-2 model by infusing liposome containing Gd (Lip/Gd), prepared in the same size as Lip/Gd/DiI-DS, with Doxil, a liposomal drug of similar size used to treat several cancers. MRI detection of Lip/Gd coadministered with Doxil provided optimum CED parameters for complete coverage of 9L-2 tumors. By permitting in vivo monitoring of therapeutic distribution in brain tumors, this technique optimizes local drug delivery and may provide a basis for clinical applications in the treatment of malignant glioma.

Smad4 is a candidate tumour-suppressor gene identified recently on chromosome 18q21.1. Both alleles are inactivated in nearly one-half of pancreatic carcinomas, but its role in the tumorigenesis of other tumours is still unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential involvement of the Smad4 locus in early-stage colorectal cancers (stages I–III) in tumour samples from a randomised multicentre trial. Of a large collection of DNA samples, 73 with a loss of one allele of the Smad4 gene were analysed for the presence of point mutations in the remaining gene. Patients, from whom biopsies were isolated, were part of a previous randomised multicentre study of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research on the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (SAKK study 40/81). Mutation analysis was restricted to the highly conserved C-terminal domain (exons 8, 9, 10 and 11) of Smad4, using PCR and single-strand conformational variant analysis. Two of the 73 patients (3%) with loss of one allele of Smad4 had a point mutation in the remaining allele. These results indicate that whereas Smad4 point mautations are prevalent in pancreatic carcinoma, they are infrequent in early stages (I–III) of colorectal cancer.

Summary Background Results of preclinical studies have shown that EGFR immunoliposomes have substantial antitumour effects. We aimed to assess the tolerability, safety, pharmokinetics, and efficacy of anti-EGFR immunoliposomes loaded with doxorubicin (anti-EGFR ILs-dox) in patients with solid tumours. Methods In this first-in-man, open-label, phase 1 clinical study, we enrolled patients at University Hospital of Basel, Switzerland, who had EGFR-overexpressing advanced solid tumours no longer amenable to standard treatment. Anti-EGFR ILs-dox nanoparticles were constructed by covalently linking pegylated liposomes containing doxorubicin to antigen-binding fragments (Fab′) of cetuximab. We intravenously infused the nanoparticle at escalating doses (doxorubicin 5 mg/m 2 , 10 mg/m 2 , 20 mg/m 2 , 30 mg/m 2 , 40 mg/m 2 , 50 mg/m 2 , and 60 mg/m 2 ) once every 4 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. The primary endpoint was to establish the maximum tolerated dose. We analysed patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01702129. Findings Between Jan 30, 2007, and March 4, 2010, we gave the drug to 29 patients, three of whom were withdrawn from the study because we could not complete a safety assessment. Of the 26 patients assessed for the primary endpoint, two who received a dose of 60 mg/m 2 had dose-limiting toxicities (one had neutropenia and the other had anaemia); therefore, the maximum tolerated dose was defined as 50 mg/m 2 . At all lower doses, anti-EGFR ILs-dox was well tolerated; grade 1 skin toxicity occurred in two patients only. We recorded 22 serious adverse events (SAEs) in 17 patients, mostly due to tumour progression. Three SAEs were fatal. Only three SAEs (febrile neutropenia, septicaemia, and a fatal massive oral bleed) were probably or possibly related to study drug. No patients had palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia, alopecia, cardiotoxicity, or cumulative toxicity. Best response to treatment included one complete response, one partial response, and ten stable disease lasting 2–12 months (median 5·75 months). Interpretation Because anti-EGFR ILs-dox was well tolerated up to 50 mg doxorubicin per m 2 , and we recorded clinical activity, further assessment of this nanoparticle at this dose in phase 2 trials is warranted. Funding Cancer League Basel, Swiss Cancer League, Schoenmakers-Muller Foundation, and Werner Geissberger Foundation.

Introduction: DLBCL subtypes may be classified by gene expression corresponding to germinal centre (GCB) or activated peripheral blood (ABC) B-cells. Treatment outcomes with R-CHOP therapy were inferior for ABCs in retrospective series, and this study investigated whether adding bortezomib could reverse the adverse prognosis. The trial used gene expression profiling (GEP) to stratify cases, with adaptive design to analyse the outcome by subtypes at predefined timepoints. Methods: Newly diagnosed patients with DLBCL underwent staging and commenced standard R-CHOP. During cycle 1, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue was used to extract messenger RNA for GEP using the Illumina DASL array platform. Cases were allocated to GCB, ABC or Unclassifiable (Unc) type before starting cycle 2, using an established algorithm based upon 20 genes. Patients with successful GEP were randomised 1:1 to receive R-CHOP +/- bortezomib 1.6 mg/m2 s/c on days 1+8 in cycles 2-6. The study was powered to detect a difference in progression-free survival (PFS) of 10% with bortezomib, with a 2-sided significance, 5% and 90% power. The adaptive design allowed for closure of randomization for GCB cases if 1-year PFS was Results: Between 6/2011 and 5/2015 1132 patients were enrolled from 109 sites, with 1078 samples analysed. Of these, 157 (15%) biopsies had inadequate material for GEP, but the remaining 921 were classified as 246 (27%) ABC, 476 (52%) GCB and 199 (22%) Unc. Successful classification was possible from both surgical and needle core biopsies. Median laboratory turnaround time was 12 working days and all results were available prior to the scheduled administration of cycle 2. Characteristics of the patients of different subtypes are shown in the table. Following both interim analyses the DMEC recommended continued recruitment of patients with a GCB phenotype. Table. ABC GCB Unc Age (years): median 67 63 63 Age (years) : range 23 to 86 20 to 82 20 to 85 % performance status 0-1 88 88 90 % at least one extranodal site 53 54 62 % bone marrow involved 15 14 23 % LDH>ULN 69 76 79 % IPI score 0/1 29 27 26 % IPI score 2/3 57 55 55 % IPI score 4/5 15 19 19 % B symptoms 46 43 49 % Bulk>10cm 17 26 21 Conclusions: This study has demonstrated the feasibility of GEP at diagnosis to subsequently guide therapy in a large multicentre trial. Although patients with ABC type lymphoma were in general slightly older, they did not appear to have other adverse prognostic features at diagnosis vs GCB. All patients will have completed therapy by the time of the meeting, allowing the initial response and toxicity data to be available for presentation. Disclosures Davies: GIlead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; CTI: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: The addition of bortezomib to R-CHOP chemotherapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Pocock:Janssen: Honoraria. Jack:Jannsen: Research Funding. Johnson:Takeda: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding.

Germinal Center (GCB) and activated (ABC) B-cell subtypes of DLBCL can be identified by Gene expression profiling (GEP). These subgroups are biologically distinct, harboring mutations in different pathways. Patients classified as ABC more often have mutations of the NF-kB pathway and an inferior response to standard R-CHOP therapy. The REMoDL-B trial utilised GEP to stratify patients for the addition of bortezomib to R-CHOP, based on the hypothesis that this agent may selectively improve the outcome of the ABC subtype. GEP was performed on RNA extracted from diagnostic formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) biopsies using Illumina WG-DASLTM during the 1st cycle of R-CHOP. Patients were classified as GCB, ABC or Unclassified before cycle 2 using the cross-platform DAC classifier (Care et al, PLOS ONE 2013) and randomised to continue R-CHOP+/-bortezomib. Work is underway to compare data generated on Affymetrix arrays and targeted RNA-seq (Illumina TRex), as well as validation by targeted mutational analysis of 18 genes associated with DLBCL (TNFAIP3, CARD11, CD79A, CD79B, MYD88, TRAF3, TNFRSF11A, PRDM1, TP53, FAS, B2M, CD58, EZH2, MLL2, MEF2B, EP300, CREBBP, KDM2B) using Fluidigm multiplex PCR and Illumina MiSeq on DNA also from the FFPE blocks. The trial closed to recruitment in May 2015 and 1147 samples have been analysed. One hundred and fifty three (13%) biopsies were unsuitable for GEP (for insufficient tumor tissue, inappropriate block sent). The remaining samples were classified as ABC (n=261, 23%), GCB (n=471, 44%) and Unclassified (n=214, 19%), with only 11 samples (1%) failing to yield a GEP result. GEP was successful in a range of sample types, including needle and endoscopic biopsies, bone marrow trephines and formal biopsies, with results obtained from as little as 40ng of total RNA, all from FFPE samples. Mutational data were available in 199 samples, with 73% of these having a mutation detectable in 1 or more genes (range 0-5) at a AAF (alternative allele frequency) cutoff at 10%. MYD88 was most commonly mutated (in 30% of ABC and 7% of GCB). EZH2 mutations were restricted to the GCB category (26%) and MYD88, CD79a/b and PRDM1 were more commonly associated with the ABC group. MYD88/PRDM1 were the most frequently associated events, with MYD88/CD79a/b and MYD88/NF-kB being mutually exclusive. Where MYD88 was seen in GCB cases, coexisting mutations imply an origin from transformed follicular lymphoma. B2M mutations were commonly identified across all subtypes (n=26), but specifically enriched in Type III (unclassified) cases (25%), which supports the hypothesis that mutational immune escape may be a feature of DLBCL, in common with other tumor types. Cross platform validation is highly concordant using Affymetrix arrays from a pilot series (27/27 gave the same classifier output, with correlating confidences also seen between platforms). RNA-seq analysis is ongoing, however initial analysis shows 86% concordance with the DASL output. Comprehensive cross platform comparison data will be available for presentation at the meeting. This study demonstrates the feasibility of GEP classification of DLBCL at diagnosis in a large international trial. The molecular classification can also be replicated using different technologies. Mutational analysis confirmed the association between DLBCL subtype and specific mutational hotspots. Disclosures Sharon: Johnson & Johnson: Other: Funded the laboratory work for the REMoDL-B trial (ISRCTN 51837425). Davies:Takeda: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Jack:Jannsen: Research Funding. Johnson:Johnson & Johnson: Other: Funded the laboratory work for the REMoDL-B trial (ISRCTN 51837425).

Liposomes labeled with various markers were subjected to local-regional administration with either direct injection or convection-enhanced delivery (CED) into rodent brains and brain tumor models. Direct injection of liposomes containing attached or encapsulated fluorochromes and/or encapsulated gold particles indicated that tissue localization of liposomes could be sensitively and specifically detected in the central nervous system (CNS). When CED was applied, liposomes achieved extensive and efficient distribution within normal mouse brains. Co-infusion of mannitol further increased tissue penetration of liposomes. Liposomes were also loaded with gadodiamide to monitor their CNS distribution in rats by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). CED-infused liposomes were readily seen on MRI scans as large regions of intense signal at 2 h, and more diffuse regions at 24 h. Finally, labeled liposomes were infused via CED into tumor tissue in glioma xenograft models in rodent hosts. In intracranial U-87 glioma xenografts, CED-infused liposomes had distributed throughout tumor tissue, including extension into surrounding normal tissue. Greater penetration was observed using 40 versus 90 nm liposomes, as well as with mannitol co-infusion. To our knowledge, this is the first report of CED infusion of liposomes into the CNS. We conclude that CED of liposomes in the CNS is a feasible approach, and offers a promising strategy for targeting therapeutic agents to brain tumors.

Aim: One standard option in the treatment of stage IIIA/N2 NSCLC is neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. We investigated in a randomized trial whether the addition of neoadjuvant radiotherapy would improve the outcome. Here we present the final results of this study. Methods: Patients (pts.) with pathologically proven, resectable stage IIIA/N2 NSCLC, performance status 0-1, and adequate organ function were randomized 1:1 to chemoradiation (CRT) with 3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (cisplatin 100 mg/m2 and docetaxel 85 mg/m2 d1, q3weeks) followed by accelerated concomitant boost radiotherapy (RT) with 44 Gy in 22 fractions in 3 weeks, or neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (CT), with subsequent surgery for all pts. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). Results: 232 pts. were randomized in 23 centers, the median follow-up was 53 months. Two thirds were men, median age was 60 years (range 37-76). Histology was squamous cell in 33%, adenocarcinoma in 43%. Response rate to CRT was 61% vs. 44% with CT. 85% of all pts. underwent surgery, 30-day postoperative mortality was 1%. The rate of complete resection was 91% (CRT) vs. 81% (CT) and the pathological complete remission (pCR) rate was 16% vs. 12%. The median EFS was 13.1 months (95% CI 9.9 - 23.5) for the CRT group vs. 11.8 months (95% CI 8.4 – 15.2) in the CT arm (p 0.665). The median overall survival (OS) with CRT was 37.1 months (95% CI 22.6 -50), with CT 26.1 months ( 95% CI 26.1 – 52.1, p 0.938). The local failure rate was 23% in both arms. In the CT arm 12 pts. were given postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for R1 resection, 6 pts. received PORT in violation of the protocol. Pts. with a pCR, mediastinal downstaging to ypN0/1 and complete resection had a better outcome. Toxicity of chemotherapy was substantial, especially febrile neutropenia was common, whereas RT was well tolerated. Conclusions: This is the first completed phase III trial to evaluate the role of induction chemoradiotherapy and surgery, in comparison to neoadjuvant CT alone followed by surgery. RT was active, it increased response, complete resection and pCR rates. However, this failed to translate into an improvement of local control, EFS or OS. Notably, surgery after induction treatment was safe, including pneumonectomy. The overall survival rates of our neoadjuvant regimen are very encouraging, especially for a multicenter setting. Disclosure: M. Pless: Advisory Board for Sanofi; R. Cathomas: Advisory Board Sanofi D.C. Betticher: Advisory Board Sanofi. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Aim: We have previously documented the feasibility of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and EPP in a multicenter trial of MPM (Weder, Ann Oncol 18: 1196, 2007). The objectives of the trimodality trial SAKK17/04 (NCT00334594) were to evaluate the time to loco-regional relapse with or without high dose hemithoracic radiotherapy in a prospective multicenter randomized phase II trial in patients with R0 and R1 resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and EPP. Methods: Eligible patients had pathologically confirmed MPM, surgically resectable TNM stage (T1-3 N0-2 M0), PS0-1, ages 18-70 years. Part 1 had a phase II design, and included neoadjuvant chemotherapy with 3 cycles of cisplatin and pemetrexed, followed by restaging and EPP. The primary endpoint of part 1 was complete macroscopic resection (R0-1). Part 2 randomized consenting patients with R0-1 resection into two parallel phase II arms (control arm A and radiotherapy arm B). The primary endpoint for part 2 was loco-regional relapse-free survival (RFS). To detect a 1 year increase with 80% power and 10% alpha, 37 patients were needed for arm B. Secondary endpoints included operability, tolerability of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, survival, and translational research Results: Because accrual of part 2 was slower than planned, the trial was stopped in 2013. Overall, 153 patients entered the trial, of whom 125 underwent surgery and 99 had a complete macroscopic resection (primary endpoint part 1). Of the later patients, 54 could be randomized 1:1 into each arm. Reasons for non-randomization included patient refusal in 24 and ineligibility or protocol deviations in 21. Of the 27 patients randomized to hemithoracic radiotherapy, 25 completed the treatment as planned. For part 1 the median RFS was 8.8 (95%CI: 7.3–10.7) and median OS was 15.0 (95% CI: 12.1–19.3) months. For part 2 the median local RFS for group A was 7.6 (95%CI: 5.5–10.7) and for group B 9.4 (95%CI: 6.5-11.9) months (primary endpoint part 2), while the overall RFS and OS for group A were 5.7 (95%CI: 3.5-8.8) and 16.9 (95%CI: 10.7-23.6) months and for group B 7.6 (95% CI:5.2-10.6) and 14.9 (95%CI: 7.0–17.6) months. Conclusions: This study did not reach the primary endpoint which was defined as one-year increase in loco-regional relapse-free survival and thus does not support the routine use of hemithoracic RT after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and EPP. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

7503 Background: For stage III/N2 NSCLC neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) followed by radical surgery is one standard treatment approach. In our previous trial, this strategy led to a median survival of 33 months (Betticher et al. JCO 2003). We now investigated whether the addition of preoperative radiotherapy (RT) would improve outcome. We report the results of a planned interim analysis on data of the first 219 patients (pts). The trial was closed to accrual in December 2012 due to futility after enrollment of 232 of 240 planned pts. Methods: Pts with pathologically proven, resectable stage IIIA/N2 NSCLC, performance status 0-1, adequate heart, kidney, liver and bone marrow function were randomized 1:1 to receive 3 cycles of NCT (cisplatin 100 mg/m2 and docetaxel 85 mg/m2 d1, q3weeks) followed by accelerated concomitant boost RT (44 Gy/22 fractions in 3 weeks) or NCT alone, with subsequent surgery for all pts. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). Results: 23 centers included 219 pts. Median age was 60 years. Pts characteristics were well balanced. Toxicity to CT was substantial, but 91% completed 3 cycles of NCT. RT-induced grade 3 esophagitis was seen in 5 pts, grade 3 skin toxicity in 2 pts. One pt in each treatment arm died during NCT, there was one postoperative death (arm NCT alone). The efficacy results are summarized below, all comparisons are statistically non-significant. Conclusions: This is the first completed phase III trial to investigate the value of the addition of neoadjuvant radiotherapy to CT and surgery. RT did not improve EFS or survival, nor did it reduce the local failure rate. Nevertheless, the overall survival rates of our neoadjuvant chemotherapy strategy confirm our previous report, and are among the best results reported to date in a multicenter setting. Clinical trial information: NCT00030771. [Table: see text]

Cultured astroglial cells secrete eicosanoids which are produced by the cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenases. These cells also transcribe the proenkephalin gene. In the present study, it was investigated whether agents which inhibit the metabolism of arachidonic acid affect the basal and stimulated expression of the gene. Tetradecanoyl phorbol acetate (TPA; 1–1000 nmol/l) increases the concentration of proenkephalin mRNA in these cells by activating protein kinase C. The enhancement in proenkephalin mRNA caused by TPA (10 nmol/l) was not affected by the cyclooxygenase inhibitor indomethacin (5 μmol/l). However, nordihydroguaiaretic acid, which blocks cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenases, potentiated the effect of TPA on proenkephalin mRNA, when used at concentrations of 0.5–50 μmol/l. Two selective inhibitors of 5-lipoxygenase, i.e. MK886 (5 μmol/l) and BAY X1005 (1 μmol/l), also enhanced the effect of TPA (10 nmol/l) without affecting the basal expression of the gene. When added to the incubation medium, leukotriene E4 (10–1000 nmol/l) diminished in a dose-dependent manner the basal and TPA-induced expression of the proenkephalin gene. It is concluded that in astroglial cells derived from cortex of new-born rats products of 5-lipoxygenase can diminish the action of protein kinase C on the proenkephalin gene.

Neuroendocrine tumors are well vascularized and express specific cell surface markers, such as somatostatin receptors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptors (GLP-1R). Using the Rip1Tag2 transgenic mouse model of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, we have investigated the potential benefit of a combination of anti-angiogenic treatment with targeted internal radiotherapy. To this end, [Lys40(Ahx-DTPA-111In)NH2]-Exendin-4, a radiopeptide that selectively binds to GLP-1R expressed on insulinoma and other neuroendocrine tumor cells, was co-administered with PTK787, an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFR). For biodistribution, Rip1Tag2 mice were pre-treated with PTK787 for 0, 3, 5 or 7 days. Subsequently, [Lys40(Ahx-DTPA-111In)NH2]-Exendin-4 was administered and the biodistribution assessed after 4 hours. For therapy, mice were injected with 1.1 MBq [Lys40(Ahx-DTPA-111In)NH2]-Exendin-4 and treated with PTK787 orally for another 7 days. Tumor volume, tumor cell apoptosis and proliferation, and microvessel density were quantified. Combination of [Lys40(Ahx-DTPA-111In)NH2]-Exendin-4 and PTK787 was significantly more effective than single treatments (p Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 5714. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-5714

RIT in CD 20 positive lymphoma has mainly been studied by using 131Iodine (131I) or 90Yttrium (90Y) labelled antibodies. Lutetium-177 linked to the chimaeric anti CD 20 antibody Rituximab (R) with DOTA (1,4,7,10-tetraaza-cyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid) as chelator emits beta rays (0.497MeV) and a gamma component (113keV 7%, 208keV 11%) suitable for imaging. Its handling is less hazardous than 131I and the beta component may give a more favourable tumour to non-tumour ratio than 90Y. The aim of the study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and to explore clinical response. Non labelled rituximab (250mg/m2) was given on d1 and d8. 177LU-D-R was injected on d8. Pts were hospitalized for five days for sequential imaging and, at higher doses, to fulfil radiation safety requirements. From Feb 02 to Aug 08 we treated 30 pts (m:16, f: 14, median # of preTx: 3) in 7 cohorts (level 1–7) of 2 to 7 pts. Since activity was already seen at the lowest dose (20 mCi/m2), escalation was carried out in steps of only 5 mCi/m2. No Grade III/IV non- hematologic toxicity was observed (2 pts being too early to evaluate). Gr II fatigue and Gr I nausea were reported mainly on the days following treatment (Tx). Hematologic toxicity: Anemia Gr II: 2 in 7 pts (2/7) at level 4, 1/4 at level 5. No Gr III/IV was seen, no transfusions were required. Lc: Gr III was seen at levels 3–6 each (nadir wk 8), no Gr IV was seen. Neutro: Gr III: 1/5 at level 3, 1/6 at level 4, 1/4 at level 5, 3/4 at level 6 no Gr IV was observed. No neutropenic fever was observed. Tc: One brief Gr IV was seen in 1 of 5 pts at level 3, one Gr III each at levels 4–6 (nadir: wk 7), no bleeding occurred and no Tc transfusions were required (2 pts being too early). Response was assessed by [18F]FDG-PET and CT or PET/CT pre Tx, wk 10 and when clinically indicated thereafter. Responses were seen on all dose levels. Six of 12 pts with untransformed follicular lymphoma (FL) (med age: 59 y, 36–82) remain in remission 74, 71, 71, 32, 6 and 4 months after RIT. One pt treated at the lowest dose had a regression of pleural effusions after RIT, received an allogeneic transplant and has been in remission for 70 months. Two pts with FL have died. One pt with transformed FL had a brief response, then received an autologous transplant and has been in remission for 2 yrs. The 14 pts with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) (med age: 71 y, 46–85) usually had brief responses in parts of their tumour mass. 10 pts have died. Median time to next Tx was 4 months. One pt with localized indolent MCL responded twice to 177LU-D-R, progressed after the 3rd Tx and is alive 60 months after his 1st dose. One pt had a brief response, then received bortezomib and has been in CR for 2 years (2 pts too early). Other indolent histologies had brief responses. With a maximum observation time of 75 months, no MDS or leukemia was seen. According to national radiation safety requirements 177LU-D- R at a dose of 50mCi/m2 requires a hospital stay of 5 days. This dose seems to have a promising therapeutic index mainly in FL and will be tested in a larger patient cohort. (This study was supported by the JP Obrecht Foundation, Arlesheim, Switzerland and the Swiss Cancer League. Day 1 and 8 Rituximab for pts 1 to 25 was provided free of charge by Roche Pharma Schweiz, Reinach, Switzerland. 177LU-D-R was manufactured at the Radiological Chemistry unit, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland. Lutetium-177 was purchased either from I.D.B. Holland BV or from Perkin Elmer, USA)

BACKGROUND Neuroendocrine tumors are well vascularized and express specific cell surface markers, such as somatostatin receptors and the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R). Using the Rip1Tag2 transgenic mouse model of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET), we have investigated the potential benefit of a combination of anti-angiogenic treatment with targeted internal radiotherapy. METHODS [Lys40(Ahx-DTPA-111In)NH2]-exendin-4, a radiopeptide that selectively binds to GLP-1R expressed on insulinoma and other neuroendocrine tumor cells, was co-administered with oral vatalanib (an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFR)) or imatinib (a c-kit/PDGFR inhibitor). The control groups included single-agent kinase inhibitor treatments and [Lys40(Ahx-DTPA-natIn)NH2]-exendin-4 monotherapy. For biodistribution, Rip1Tag2 mice were pre-treated with oral vatalanib or imatinib for 0, 3, 5, or 7 days at a dose of 100 mg/kg. Subsequently, [Lys40(Ahx-DTPA-111In)NH2]-exendin-4 was administered i.v., and the biodistribution was assessed after 4 h. For therapy, the mice were injected with 1.1 MBq [Lys40(Ahx-DTPA-111In)NH2]-exendin-4 and treated with vatalanib or imatinib 100 mg/kg orally for another 7 days. Tumor volume, tumor cell apoptosis and proliferation, and microvessel density were quantified. RESULTS Combination of [Lys40(Ahx-DTPA-111In)NH2]-exendin-4 and vatalanib was significantly more effective than single treatments (p

Methods The trial uses an adaptive design and aims to recruit 940 patients across 100 sites in the UK and Switzerland (currently recruited 398 patients). After being profiled within real time (during cycle 1), ABC, GCB and unclassifiable molecular phenotype patients are randomised to receive RB-CHOP or R-CHOP with equal allocation. Two interim analyses will be carried out to stop the good prognosis GCB group early if required using a Case Morgan [1] analysis: (i) The first will be a safety analysis performed after the first 55 GCB RB-CHOP patients have been followed for 6 months. If 6 month PFS