Search

Rates of survival with functional recovery for both in-hospital and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest are notably low. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is emerging as a modality to improve prognosis by augmenting perfusion to vital end-organs by utilizing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) during conventional CPR and stabilizing the patient for interventions aimed at reversing the aetiology of the arrest. Implementing this emergent procedure requires a substantial investment in resources, and even the most successful ECPR programs may nonetheless burden healthcare systems, clinicians, patients, and their families with unsalvageable patients supported by extracorporeal devices. Non-randomized and observational studies have repeatedly shown an association between ECPR and improved survival, versus conventional CPR, for in-hospital cardiac arrest in select patient populations. Recently, randomized controlled trials suggest benefit for ECPR over standard resuscitation, as well as the feasibility of performing such trials, in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest within highly coordinated healthcare delivery systems. Application of these data to clinical practice should be done cautiously, with outcomes likely to vary by the setting and system within which ECPR is initiated. ECPR introduces important ethical challenges, including whether it should be considered an extension of CPR, at what point it becomes sustained organ replacement therapy, and how to approach patients unable to recover or be bridged to heart replacement therapy. The economic impact of ECPR varies by health system, and has the potential to outstrip resources if used indiscriminately. Ideally, studies should include economic evaluations to inform health care systems about the cost-benefits of this therapy.

OBJECTIVES Postoperative mediastinitis, a feared complication after cardiac surgery, is associated with high mortality, especially of critically ill patients. Candida species infections are rare and severe, with poorly known outcomes. We conducted a case–control study to describe the characteristics, management and outcomes of patients with postoperative Candida mediastinitis. METHODS This French, monocentre, retrospective study included all patients with postoperative Candida mediastinitis (January 2003–February 2020) requiring intensive care unit admission. Candida mediastinitis patients (henceforth cases) were matched 1:1 with postoperative bacterial mediastinitis (henceforth control), based on 3 factors during mediastinitis management: age >40 years, cardiac transplantation and invasive circulatory device used. The primary end point was the probability of survival within 1 year after intensive care unit (ICU) admission. RESULTS Forty cases were matched to 40 controls. The global male/female ratio was 2.1, with mean age at admission 47.9 ± 13.8 years. Candida species were: 67.5% albicans, 17.5% glabrata, 15% parapsilosis, 5.0% tropicalis, 2.5% krusei and 2.5% lusitaniae. The median duration of mechanical ventilation was 23, 68.8% of patients received renal replacement therapy and 62.5% extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. The probability of survival within the first year after ICU admission was 40 ± 5.5% and was significantly lower for cases than for controls (43 ± 8% vs 80 ± 6.3%, respectively; Log-rank test: P < 0.0001). The multivariable Cox proportional hazards model retained only renal replacement therapy [hazard ratio (HR) 3.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1–13.1; P = 0.04] and Candida mediastinitis (HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.1–5.6; P = 0.04) as independently associated with 1-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS Candida mediastinitis is a serious event after cardiac surgery and independently associated with 1-year mortality. Further studies are needed to determine whether deaths are directly attributable to Candida mediastinitis.

Hemostatic changes induced by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support have been yet poorly documented in coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) patients who have a baseline complex hypercoagulable state. In this prospective monocentric study of patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) rescued by ECMO, we performed longitudinal measurements of coagulation and fibrinolysis markers throughout the course of ECMO support in 20 COVID-19 and 10 non-COVID-19 patients. Blood was sampled before and then 24 hours, 7, and 14 days after ECMO implantation. Clinical outcomes were prospectively assessed until discharge from the intensive care unit or death. The median age of participants was 47 (35–56) years, with a median body mass index of 30 (27–35) kg/m2, and a Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment score of 12 (8–16). Baseline levels of von Willebrand factor, fibrinogen, factor VIII, prothrombin F1 + 2, thrombin–antithrombin, D-dimer, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) were elevated in both COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 ARDS patients, indicating that endothelial activation, endogenous thrombin generation, and fibrinolysis shutdown occur in all ARDS patients before ECMO implantation. From baseline to day 7, thrombin generation (prothrombin F1 + 2, p

Background Mechanical ventilation (MV) is the cornerstone in the management of the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Recent research suggests that decreasing the intensity of MV using lung protective ventilation (LPV) with lower tidal volume (Vt) and driving pressure (∆P) could improve survival. Extra-corporal CO2 removal (ECCO2R) precisely enables LPV by allowing lower Vt, ∆P and mechanical power while maintaining PaCO2 within a physiologic range. This study evaluates the potential cost-effectiveness of ECCO2R-enabled LPV in France. Methods We modelled the distribution over time of ventilated ARDS patients across 3 health-states (alive & ventilated, alive & weaned from ventilation, dead). We compared the outcomes of 3 strategies: MV (no ECCO2R), LPV (ECCO2R when PaCO2 > 55 mmHg) and Ultra-LPV (ECCO2R for all). Patients characteristics, ventilation settings, survival and lengths of stay were derived from a large ARDS epidemiology study. Survival benefits associated with lower ∆P were taken from the analysis of more than 3000 patients enrolled in 9 randomized trials. Health outcomes were expressed in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were computed with both Day 60 cost and Lifetime cost. Results Both LPV and ULPV as enabled by ECCO2R provided favorable results at Day 60 as compared to MV. Survival rates were increased with the protective strategies, notably with ULPV that provided even more manifest benefits as compared to MV. LPV and ULPV produced +0.162 and + 0.627 incremental QALYs as compared to MV, respectively. LPV and ULPV costs were augmented because of their survival benefits. Nonetheless, ICERs of LPV and ULPV vs. MV were all well below the €50,000 threshold. ULPV also presented with favorable ICERs as compared to LPV (i.e. less than €25,000/QALY). Conclusions ECCO2R-enabled LPV strategies might provide cost-effective survival benefit. Additional data from interventional and observational studies are needed to support this preliminary model-based analysis.

Introduction : Mechanically ventilated patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for generalized convulsive status epilepticus (GCSE) are a heterogeneous population. Our objective was to evaluate the number of patients who fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for refractory GCSE and describe their initial management and prognosis. Methods : This multicenter retrospective study was conducted in four French ICUs in Pitie-Salpetriere University Hospital in Paris and in the Hospital of Jossigny. Mechanically ventilated patients admitted to the ICU for GCSE between, January 1, 2014, and, December 31, 2016, were included. Patients with anoxia and traumatic brain injury were excluded. Their pre-hospital and ICU medical records were reviewed. The collected data included pre-hospital clinical status, pre-hospital antiepileptic treatment, reason for mechanical ventilation, duration of general anesthesia, and prognosis in the ICU. A retrospective initial diagnosis based on the findings of the analysis of the clinical records was attributed to each patient. Results : Among the 98 patients included, 88.8% (n = 87/98) fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for GCSE; of these cases, 16.1% (n = 14/87) were refractory. Eleven percent of the patients did not fulfill the criteria for GCSE at the time of initial management (retrospective diagnosis of single convulsive seizure, repetitive convulsive seizures, or psychogenic non-epileptic seizures). Most patients were intubated for coma (58.9%, n = 56/95, missing data: n = 3). In the ICU, the median [Q1–Q3] duration of general anesthesia before weaning was 12.3 h (5.0–18.0 h); 7% of the patients had a relapse of status epilepticus, and 2% died in the ICU. Conclusion : Among the cases of confirmed GCSE in the mechanically ventilated patients admitted to the ICU, 16.1% were refractory, with an overall good prognosis. A significant proportion of patients did not fulfill the diagnostic criteria for refractory GCSE.

International audience; BACKGROUND: Delaying renal replacement therapy (RRT) for some time in critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury and no severe complication is safe and allows optimisation of the use of medical devices. Major uncertainty remains concerning the duration for which RRT can be postponed without risk. Our aim was to test the hypothesis that a more-delayed initiation strategy would result in more RRT-free days, compared with a delayed strategy. METHODS: This was an unmasked, multicentre, prospective, open-label, randomised, controlled trial done in 39 intensive care units in France. We monitored critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury (defined as Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes stage 3) until they had oliguria for more than 72 h or a blood urea nitrogen concentration higher than 112 mg/dL. Patients were then randomly assigned (1:1) to either a strategy (delayed strategy) in which RRT was started just after randomisation or to a more-delayed strategy. With the more-delayed strategy, RRT initiation was postponed until mandatory indication (noticeable hyperkalaemia or metabolic acidosis or pulmonary oedema) or until blood urea nitrogen concentration reached 140 mg/dL. The primary outcome was the number of days alive and free of RRT between randomisation and day 28 and was done in the intention-to-treat population. The study is registered with ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT03396757 and is completed. FINDINGS: Between May 7, 2018, and Oct 11, 2019, of 5336 patients assessed, 278 patients underwent randomisation; 137 were assigned to the delayed strategy and 141 to the more-delayed strategy. The number of complications potentially related to acute kidney injury or to RRT were similar between groups. The median number of RRT-free days was 12 days (IQR 0-25) in the delayed strategy and 10 days (IQR 0-24) in the more-delayed strategy (p=0·93). In a multivariable analysis, the hazard ratio for death at 60 days was 1·65 (95% CI 1·09-2·50, p=0·018) with the more-delayed versus the delayed strategy. The number of complications potentially related to acute kidney injury or renal replacement therapy did not differ between groups. INTERPRETATION: In severe acute kidney injury patients with oliguria for more than 72 h or blood urea nitrogen concentration higher than 112 mg/dL and no severe complication that would mandate immediate RRT, longer postponing of RRT initiation did not confer additional benefit and was associated with potential harm. FUNDING: Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique.

Disclaimer:This is an updated guideline from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) for the role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for patients with severe cardiopulmonary failure due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The great majority of COVID-19 patients (>90%) requiring ECMO have been supported using venovenous (V-V) ECMO for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). While COVID-19 ECMO run duration may be longer than in non-COVID-19 ECMO patients, published mortality appears to be similar between the two groups. However, data collection is ongoing, and there is a signal that overall mortality may be increasing. Conventional selection criteria for COVID-19-related ECMO should be used; however, when resources become more constrained during a pandemic, more stringent contraindications should be implemented. Formation of regional ECMO referral networks may facilitate communication, resource sharing, expedited patient referral, and mobile ECMO retrieval. There are no data to suggest deviation from conventional ECMO device or patient management when applying ECMO for COVID-19 patients. Rarely, children may require ECMO support for COVID-19-related ARDS, myocarditis, or multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C); conventional selection criteria and management practices should be the standard. We strongly encourage participation in data submission to investigate the optimal use of ECMO for COVID-19.

Purpose To report four cases of life-threatening COVID-19 pneumonia in patients with high blood concentrations of neutralizing autoantibodies against type I interferons (IFNs), who were treated with plasma exchange (PE) as a rescue therapy. Methods Prospective case series, which included patients, diagnosed with RT-PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and positive autoantibodies against type I IFNs in two French intensive care units (ICUs) between October 8 and November 14, 2020. Six critically ill COVID-19 patients with no anti-IFN antibodies were used as controls. Anti-IFN autoantibodies and IFN concentrations, together with the levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, were measured sequentially in serum. Viral load was determined in the upper and lower respiratory tract. Patients were followed during hospital stay. Results Three men and one woman were included. Three of the patients had four PE sessions each, while another had three PE sessions. PE decreased the concentrations of autoantibodies against type I IFN in all four patients, whereas anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels remained stable. Autoantibodies against type I IFN levels were high in tracheal aspirates of one patient and decreased after three PE sessions. By contrast, anti-IFN autoantibodies were not detected in tracheal aspirates from five control patients without detectable anti-IFN autoantibodies in serum. During PE, serum IFN-α levels slightly increased in three out of four patients, and upper respiratory tract viral load decreased in all patients. All patients were alive at day 28 of ICU admission. Two patients eventually died in the ICU, while the two survivors were discharged from the ICU at days 50 and 66. Conclusions PE efficiently removes autoantibodies against type I IFNs, including those detected in tracheal aspirates, without affecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels, in patients with life-threatening COVID-19 pneumonia. The clinical benefit of PE in patients with autoantibodies against type I IFNs should be tested in a larger study. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10875-021-00994-9.

Purpose To assess the effect of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) compared to conventional management in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods We conducted a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) performed after Jan 1, 2000 comparing ECMO to conventional management in patients with severe ARDS. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality. Primary analysis was by intent-to-treat. Results We identified two RCTs (CESAR and EOLIA) and combined data from 429 patients. On day 90, 77 of the 214 (36%) ECMO-group and 103 of the 215 (48%) control group patients had died (relative risk (RR), 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.6–0.94; P = 0.013; I2 = 0%). In the per-protocol and as-treated analyses the RRs were 0.75 (95% CI 0.6–0.94) and 0.86 (95% CI 0.68–1.09), respectively. Rescue ECMO was used for 36 (17%) of the 215 control patients (35 in EOLIA and 1 in CESAR). The RR of 90-day treatment failure, defined as death for the ECMO-group and death or crossover to ECMO for the control group was 0.65 (95% CI 0.52–0.8; I2 = 0%). Patients randomised to ECMO had more days alive out of the ICU and without respiratory, cardiovascular, renal and neurological failure. The only significant treatment-covariate interaction in subgroups was lower mortality with ECMO in patients with two or less organs failing at randomization. Conclusions In this meta-analysis of individual patient data in severe ARDS, 90-day mortality was significantly lowered by ECMO compared with conventional management. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00134-020-06248-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

International audience; Veno-venous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly used in Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) patients with the most severe forms of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Its use is associated with a significant hemostatic challenge, especially in COVID- 19 patients who have been demonstrated to otherwise present a COVID-19-associated coagulopathy. The systematic use of unfractionated heparin therapy to prevent circuit thrombosis is warranted during ECMO support. The clinical presentation and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, which is a rare but life-threatening complication of heparin therapy, has not been described in those patients yet. We report herein two cases of laboratory-confirmed HIT in COVID-19 patients with severe ARDS admitted to our intensive care unit for VV-ECMO support and the successful use of argatroban as an alternative therapy. We also provide a brief literature review of best evidence for managing such patients. The diagnosis and management of HIT is particularly challenging in COVID-19 patients receiving ECMO support. An increased awareness is warranted in those patients who already present a procoagulant state leading to higher rates of thrombotic events which can confuse the issues. Argatroban seems to be an appropriate and safe therapeutic option in COVID-19 patients with HIT while on VV-ECMO.

International audience; Purpose: The Impella® device is a form of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) used in critically ill adults with cardiogenic shock. We sought to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes following the use of Impella, including mortality, healthcare utilization, and costs.Methods: Population-based, retrospective cohort study of adult patients (≥ 16 yr) receiving Impella in Ontario, Canada (1 April 2012-31March 2019). We captured outcomes through linkage to health administrative databases. The primary outcome was mortality during hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included mortality at 30 days, 90 days, and one year following Impella insertion. We analyzed health system costs in Canadian dollars in the year following the date of the index admission, including the costs of inpatient admission.Results: We included 162 patients. Mean (standard deviation) age was 59.2 (14.5) yr, and 73.5% of patients were male. Median [interquartile range (IQR)] time to Impella insertion from date of hospital admission was 2 [1-9] days. In-hospital mortality was 56.8%, and a significant proportion of patients were bridged to a ventricular assist device (67.9%). Mortality at one year was 61.7%. Among hospital survivors, only 38.6% were discharged home independently. Median [IQR] total cost in the year following admission among all patients was $88,397 [32,718-225,628], of which $66,529 [22,789-183,165] was attributed to inpatient care.Conclusions: In-hospital mortality among patients with cardiogenic shock receiving Impella is high, but with minimal increase at one year. While Impella patients accrued substantial costs, these largely reflected inpatient costs, and not costs incurred following hospital discharge.; ObjectifLe dispositif Impella® est un système d’assistance circulatoire mécanique utilisé chez les adultes en état critique souffrant d’un choc cardiogénique. Nous avons souhaité évaluer les issues à court et à long terme liées à l’utilisation de l’Impella, notamment la mortalité, l’utilisation des soins de santé et les coûts.MéthodeNous avons réalisé une étude de cohorte rétrospective basée sur une population de patients adultes (≥ 16 ans) recevant un Impella en Ontario, au Canada (1er avril 2012–31 mars 2019). Nous avons saisi les données pertinentes à nos critères d’évaluation en créant des liens avec les bases de données administratives de santé. Le critère d’évaluation principal était la mortalité pendant l’hospitalisation. Les critères d’évaluation secondaires comportaient la mortalité à 30 jours, 90 jours et un an après l’insertion de l’Impella. Nous avons analysé les coûts pour le système de santé en dollars canadiens au cours de l’année suivant la date d’admission initiale, notamment les coûts hospitaliers.RésultatsNous avons inclus 162 patients. L’âge moyen (écart type) était de 59,2 (14,5) ans, et 73,5 % des patients étaient des hommes. Le temps médian [écart interquartile (ÉIQ)] jusqu’à insertion de l’Impella depuis l’admission à l’hôpital était de 2 [1–9] jours. La mortalité hospitalière était de 56,8 %, et un dispositif d’assistance ventriculaire a été implanté chez une importante proportion de patients (67,9 %). La mortalité à un an était de 61,7 %. Parmi les survivants hospitaliers, seuls 38,6 % ont reçu leur congé pour un retour indépendant à la maison. Le coût total médian [ÉIQ] pour l’année suivant l’admission parmi tous les patients était de 88 397 $ [32 718 – 225 628 $], dont 66 259 $ [22 789 – 183 165 $] étaient attribuables aux soins hospitaliers.ConclusionLa mortalité hospitalière parmi les patients en choc cardiogénique chez lesquels un Impella est installé est élevée, mais on n’observe qu’une augmentation minimale à un an. Alors que les patients ayant reçu un Impella ont engendré des coûts importants, ces coûts reflètent principalement les coûts hospitaliers et non les coûts encourus après le congé de l’hôpital.

Spinal cord infarction (SCI) is a rare disease among central nervous system vascular diseases. Only a little is known about venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO)-related SCI. Retrospective observational study conducted, from 2006 to 2019, in a tertiary referral center on patients who developed VA-ECMO-related neurovascular complications, focusing on SCI. During this period, among the 1893 patients requiring VA-ECMO support, 112 (5.9%) developed an ECMO-related neurovascular injury: 65 (3.4%) ischemic strokes, 40 (2.1%) intracranial bleeding, one cerebral thrombophlebitis (0.05%) and 6 (0.3%) spinal cord infarction. Herein, we report a series of six patients with refractory cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest receiving circulatory support with VA-ECMO who developed subsequent SCI during ECMO course, confirmed by spine MRI after ECMO withdrawal. All six patients had long-term neurological disabilities. VA-ECMO-related SCI is a rare but catastrophic complication. Its diagnosis is usually delayed due to sedation requirement and/or ICU acquired weakness after sedation withdrawal, leading to difficulties in monitoring their neurological status. Even if no specific treatment exist for SCI, its prompt diagnosis is mandatory, to prevent secondary spine insults of systemic origin. Based on these results, we suggest that daily sedation interruption and neurological exam of the lower limbs should be performed in all VA-ECMO patients. Large registries are mandatory to determine VA-ECMO-related SCI risk factor and potential therapy. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s10047-020-01179-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Objectives Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is increasingly being used to treat patients with refractory severe heart failure. Large animal models are developed to help understand physiology and build translational research projects. In order to better understand those experimental models, we conducted a systematic literature review of animal models combining heart failure and VA-ECMO. Studies selection A systematic review was performed using Medline via PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, from January 1996 to January 2019. Animal models combining experimental acute heart failure and ECMO were included. Clinical studies, abstracts, and studies not employing VA-ECMO were excluded. Data extraction Following variables were extracted, relating to four key features: (1) study design, (2) animals and their peri-experimental care, (3) heart failure models and characteristics, and (4) ECMO characteristics and management. Results Nineteen models of heart failure and VA-ECMO were included in this review. All were performed in large animals, the majority (n = 13) in pigs. Acute myocardial infarction (n = 11) with left anterior descending coronary ligation (n = 9) was the commonest mean of inducing heart failure. Most models employed peripheral VA-ECMO (n = 14) with limited reporting. Conclusion Among models that combined severe heart failure and VA-ECMO, there is a large heterogeneity in both design and reporting, as well as methods employed for heart failure. There is a need for standardization of reporting and minimum dataset to ensure translational research achieve high-quality standards.

Background The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disease defined by thrombotic events that can require ICU admission because of organ dysfunction related to macrovascular and/or microvascular thrombosis. Critically ill patients with thrombosis and APS were studied to gain insight into their prognoses and in-hospital mortality-associated factors. Methods This French national, multicenter, retrospective study included all patients with APS and any new thrombotic manifestations admitted to 24 ICUs (January 2000-September 2018). Results During the study period, 134 patients (male/female ratio, 0.4) with 152 APS episodes were admitted to the ICU (mean age at admission, 46.0 ± 15.1 years). In-hospital mortality of their 134 last episodes was 35 of 134 (26.1%). The Cox multivariable model retained certain factors (hazard ratio [95% CI]: age ≥ 40 years, 11.4 [3.1-41.5], P Conclusions In-ICU anticoagulation was the only APS-specific treatment independently associated with survival for all patients. Double therapy was independently associated with better survival of patients with definite/probable catastrophic APS. In these patients, further studies are needed to determine the role of triple therapy.

This review focuses on the use of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for respiratory failure across all blood flow ranges. Starting with a short overview of historical development, aspects of the physiology of gas exchange (i.e., oxygenation and decarboxylation) during extracorporeal circulation are discussed. The mechanisms of phenomena such as recirculation and shunt playing an important role in daily clinical practice are explained. Treatment of refractory and symptomatic hypoxemic respiratory failure (e.g., acute respiratory distress syndrome [ARDS]) currently represents the main indication for high-flow veno-venous-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. On the other hand, lower-flow extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal might potentially help to avoid or attenuate ventilator-induced lung injury by allowing reduction of the energy load (i.e., driving pressure, mechanical power) transmitted to the lungs during mechanical ventilation or spontaneous ventilation. In the latter context, extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal plays an emerging role in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients during acute exacerbations. Both applications of extracorporeal lung support raise important ethical considerations, such as likelihood of ultimate futility and end-of-life decision-making. The review concludes with a brief overview of potential technical developments and persistent challenges.

Ventilator-induced lung injury remains a key contributor to the morbidity and mortality of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Efforts to minimize this injury are typically limited by the need to preserve adequate gas exchange. In the most severe forms of the syndrome, extracorporeal life support is increasingly being deployed for severe hypoxemia or hypercapnic acidosis refractory to conventional ventilator management strategies. Data from a recent randomized controlled trial, a post-hoc analysis of that trial, a meta-analysis, and a large, international, multicenter observational study, all suggest that extracorporeal life support, when combined with lower tidal volumes and airway pressures than the current standard of care, may improve outcomes compared with conventional management in patients with the most severe forms of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. These findings raise important questions not only about the optimal ventilator strategies for patients receiving extracorporeal support, but how various mechanisms of lung injury in the acute respiratory distress syndrome may potentially be mitigated by ultra-lung-protective ventilation strategies when gas exchange is sufficiently managed with the extracorporeal circuit. Additional studies are needed to more precisely delineate the best strategies for optimizing invasive mechanical ventilation in this patient population.

International audience; OBJECTIVES:Despite the increasing use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to treat severe cardiogenic shock patients, microcirculation data in this context are scarce. We evaluated the venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation impact on macrocirculatory hemodynamics and microcirculation in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock and compared the evolutions of those parameters between patients successfully weaned-off extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and those who died on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.DESIGN:Prospective study.SETTING:Academic medical ICU.PATIENTS:Consecutive patients with refractory cardiogenic shock (cardiac arrest excluded) who required venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and for whom sublingual microcirculation measurements before cannulation were possible.INTERVENTIONS:All patients were followed until death or venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation removal. Microcirculatory and macrocirculatory evaluations were made before, and 2, 4, 12, 24, and 48 hours after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation initiation, respectively. Patients weaned-off extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were also evaluated 6 hours before and after venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation removal.MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Fourteen patients (median age, 58 yr [interquartile range, 56-62 yr]; Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, 14 [12-18]) were included. Acute myocardial infarction (50%) was the main cause of cardiogenic shock. Six patients (33%) were successfully weaned-off extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Profound microcirculation parameter changes found before venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation implantation regressed within 12 hours after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation onset. Pre-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation macrocirculation, echocardiography, arterial blood gases, and microcirculation parameters did not differ between patients who died on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and those successfully weaned. However, perfused small-vessel density, small-vessel density, and percent perfused vessels were consistently higher and then stabilized 48 hours postcannulation for patients successfully weaned-off extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.CONCLUSIONS:Microcirculation is severely impaired in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock requiring venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Inability to rapidly restore microcirculation during the first 24 hours, despite normal global/macrocirculatory hemodynamics, was associated with death on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Further studies are now warranted to better determine the relevant microcirculation determinants during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, before future routine use of this promising tool in clinical practice.

Introduction Systemic rheumatic diseases (SRDs) are a group of inflammatory disorders that can require intensive care unit (ICU) admission because of multiorgan involvement with end-organ failure(s), whose may need a VA- or VV-ECMO support. Data focusing on ECMO in SRD patients are scarce and many questions persist. We undertook this study to determine the outcomes and unfavorable outcome-associated factors of severely ill SRD patients requiring ECMO support. Materials and methods This French monocenter, retrospective study included all SRD patients requiring venovenous (VV)- or venoarterial (VA)-ECMO admitted to a 26-bed ECMO-dedicated ICU from January 2006 to February 2020. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes included patient's characteristics (laboratory findings, in-ICU organ-failure treatment(s), SRD-specific manifestations and treatment(s), complications). Were compared the primary and secondary outcomes for the entire population and in the following subgroups : flare-/infection-related admission and VA/VV-ECMO. Results Ninety patients (male/female ratio : 0.5 ; mean age at admission : 41.6 ± 15.2 years) admitted to the ICU received VA/VV-ECMO, respectively, for an SRD-related flare (n = 69, n = 38/31) or infection (n = 21, n = 10/11). The flow chart reports patients’ outcomes according to the reason for admission and ECMO hook-up. SRD was diagnosed in-ICU for 31 (34.4 %) patients. In-ICU and in-hospital mortality rates were 48.9 % and 51.1%, respectively. Nine patients were bridged to cardiac (n = 5) or lung transplantation (n = 4), or left ventricular assist device (n = 2). The Cox multivariable model retained the following independent predictors of in-hospital mortality : in-ICU SRD diagnosis, day-0 Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II score ≥ 70 and arterial lactate ≥ 7.5 mmol/L for VA-ECMO–treated patients ; day-0 SAPS II score ≥ 70, ventilator-associated pneumonia and arterial lactate ≥ 7.5 mmol/L for VV-ECMO–treated patients whereas vasculitis independently predicts hospital survey. Conclusion/Discussion The main analysis considered VA- and VV-ECMO patients jointly. The reasons for ICU admissions and ECMO canulation, and the characteristics, management and outcomes of these patients obviously differ. However, the analysis aimed to present a comprehensive, real-life picture of ECMO treatment of SRD patients, with separate analyses of VA- and VV-ECMO subgroups thereafter. Conclusion ECMO support appears to be relevant for critically ill SRD patients, with 49% survival at hospital discharge. Herein, we report the largest series of ECMO-treated, severely ill SRD patients. Vasculitis was independently associated with favorable outcomes of VV-ECMO–treated patients. Further studies are needed to specify the role of ECMO for SRD patients.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is used to provide cardiac and/or pulmonary support in patients refractory to conventional therapies. It is increasingly used in various clinical acute settings and associated with cerebrovascular complications responsible for high morbidity and mortality.

Background Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was frequently used to treat patients with severe coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19)-associated acute respiratory distress (ARDS) during the initial outbreak. Care of COVID-19 patients evolved markedly during the second part of 2020. Our objective was to compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients who received ECMO for severe COVID-19 ARDS before or after July 1, 2020. Methods We included consecutive adults diagnosed with COVID-19 in Paris–Sorbonne University Hospital Network ICUs, who received ECMO for severe ARDS until January 28, 2021. Characteristics and survival probabilities over time were estimated during the first and second waves. Pre-ECMO risk factors predicting 90-day mortality were assessed using multivariate Cox regression. Results Characteristics of the 88 and 71 patients admitted, respectively, before and after July 1, 2020, were comparable except for older age, more frequent use of dexamethasone (18% vs. 82%), high-flow nasal oxygenation (19% vs. 82%) and/or non-invasive ventilation (7% vs. 37%) after July 1. Respective estimated probabilities (95% confidence intervals) of 90-day mortality were 36% (27–47%) and 48% (37–60%) during the first and the second periods. After adjusting for confounders, probability of 90-day mortality was significantly higher for patients treated after July 1 (HR 2.27, 95% CI 1.02–5.07). ECMO-related complications did not differ between study periods. Conclusions 90-day mortality of ECMO-supported COVID-19–ARDS patients increased significantly after July 1, 2020, and was no longer comparable to that of non-COVID ECMO-treated patients. Failure of prolonged non-invasive oxygenation strategies before intubation and increased lung damage may partly explain this outcome.

Background Over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, the care of patients with COVID-19 has changed and the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has increased. We aimed to examine patient selection, treatments, outcomes, and ECMO centre characteristics over the course of the pandemic to date.Methods We retrospectively analysed the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry and COVID-19 Addendum to compare three groups of ECMO-supported patients with COVID-19 (aged >= 16 years). At early-adopting centres-ie, those using ECMO support for COVID-19 throughout 2020-we compared patients who started ECMO on or before May 1, 2020 (group A1), and between May 2 and Dec 31, 2020 (group A2). Late-adopting centres were those that provided ECMO for COVID-19 only after May 1, 2020 (group B). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality in a time-to-event analysis assessed 90 days after ECMO initiation. A Cox proportional hazards model was fit to compare the patient and centre-level adjusted relative risk of mortality among the groups.Findings In 2020, 4812 patients with COVID-19 received ECMO across 349 centres within 41 countries. For earlyadopting centres, the cumulative incidence of in-hospital mortality 90 days after ECMO initiation was 36.9% (95% CI 34.1-39.7) in patients who started ECMO on or before May 1 (group A1) versus 51.9% (50.0-53.8) after May 1 (group A2); at late-adopting centres (group B), it was 58.9% (55.4-62.3). Relative to patients in group A2, group A1 patients had a lower adjusted relative risk of in-hospital mortality 90 days after ECMO (hazard ratio 0.82 [0.70-0.96]), whereas group B patients had a higher adjusted relative risk (1.42 [1.17-1.73]).Interpretation Mortality after ECMO for patients with COVID-19 worsened during 2020. These findings inform the role of ECMO in COVID-19 for patients, clinicians, and policy makers. Copyright (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Purpose At the critical care level, the flu surveillance system is limited in France, with heterogeneous regional modalities of implementation. Materials, patients and methods We aimed at assessing the relevance of the Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) clinical data warehouse for estimating the burden of the influenza epidemic on medical adult critical care units of the AP-HP, and outcome of patients during the flu season 2017–2018. This exploratory multi-site epidemiological study comprised all consecutive adult stays (n = 320) in 18 medical intensive care units (ICU) or intermediate care wards (ICW) for probable or confirmed Influenza virus infection during the 2017–2018 flu season. Results Patients admitted to ICU/ICW had low vaccination coverage (21%), required life support in 60% of cases, stayed in the ICU for a median of 8 days, and had high 28-day mortality rate (19.7%; 95% confidence interval 15.5–24.5). Early prognostic factors included age, core temperature, the acute organ failures score, and the early administration of antiviral therapy. Conclusions Data directly extracted from the electronic medical records stored in the data warehouse provide detailed clinical, care pathway and prognosis information. The real-time availability should enable to detect and assess the burden of the most severe cases. By a firmer and more acute monitoring and adjustment of care and patient management, hospitals could generate more ICU/ICW capacities, sensitize their emergency department and contribute to the recommendations from health authorities. This pilot study is of particular relevance in the context of emerging epidemics of severe acute respiratory diseases.

There has been a significant increase in the use of short-term percutaneous ventricular assist devices (pVADs) as acute circulatory support in cardiogenic shock and to provide haemodynamic support during interventional procedures, including high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions. Although frequently considered together, pVADs differ in their haemodynamic effects, management, indications, insertion techniques, and monitoring requirements. This consensus document summarizes the views of an expert panel by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) and the Association for Acute Cardiovascular Care (ACVC) and appraises the value of short-term pVAD. It reviews the pathophysiological context and possible indications for pVAD in different clinical settings and provides guidance regarding the management of pVAD based on existing evidence and best current practice.

International audience

We read with great interest the comment by Suarez-Perez et al. on our article.[1] We share their concerns regarding the need for a cautious interpretation of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLA) positivity in patients with coronary virus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Herein, we would like to add further insights in the discussion.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) is associated with both severe systemic inflammation and a prothrombotic state, as reflected by significant increases in fibrinogen and D‐dimers levels that have been associated with poor prognosis and high rates of severe pulmonary embolism. A recent report suggested a role for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLA) in the thrombotic manifestations associated with severe COVID‐19. As we also recently noticed unexplained lengthening of activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) in some critically ill COVID‐19 patients, we explored our patients for aPLA positivity.

Aims Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) without return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) despite conventional resuscitation is common and has poor outcomes. Adding extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (extracorporeal-CPR) is increasingly used in an attempt to improve outcomes. Methods and results We analysed a prospective registry of 13 191 OHCAs in the Paris region from May 2011 to January 2018. We compared survival at hospital discharge with and without extracorporeal-CPR and identified factors associated with survival in patients given extracorporeal-CPR. Survival was 8% in 525 patients given extracorporeal-CPR and 9% in 12 666 patients given conventional-CPR (P = 0.91). By adjusted multivariate analysis, extracorporeal-CPR was not associated with hospital survival [odds ratio (OR), 1.3; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.8–2.1; P = 0.24]. By conditional logistic regression with matching on a propensity score (including age, sex, occurrence at home, bystander CPR, initial rhythm, collapse-to-CPR time, duration of resuscitation, and ROSC), similar results were found (OR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.5–1.3; P = 0.41). In the extracorporeal-CPR group, factors associated with hospital survival were initial shockable rhythm (OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.5–10.3; P = 0.005), transient ROSC before ECMO (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.1–4.7; P = 0.03), and prehospital ECMO implantation (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.5–5.9; P = 0.002). Conclusions In a population-based registry, 4% of OHCAs were treated with extracorporeal-CPR, which was not associated with increased hospital survival. Early ECMO implantation may improve outcomes. The initial rhythm and ROSC may help select patients for extracorporeal-CPR.

International audience; PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Temporary circulatory support (TCS) with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is increasingly used as a salvage therapy for patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. This article provides an overview of VA-ECMO principles, indications, management, complications, and discusses the results of recent case series and trials.RECENT FINDINGS: VA-ECMO is utilized as a bridge to 'decision' that includes weaning after cardiac function recovery, transplantation, long-term mechanical circulatory support, and withdrawal in case of futility. VA-ECMO is considered the first-line TCS as it allows rapid improvement in oxygenation, is less expensive, and is also suitable for patients with biventricular failure. Combining Impella (Abiomed, Danvers, MA, USA) or intra-aortic balloon pump support with VA-ECMO might decrease left ventricular pressure and improve outcomes. Massive pulmonary embolism, sepsis-associated cardiomyopathy, and refractory cardiac arrest are among emerging indications for TCS.SUMMARY: TCS have become the cornerstone of the management of patients with cardiogenic shock, although the evidence supporting their efficacy is limited. VA-ECMO is considered the first-line option, with a growing number of accepted and emerging indications. Randomized clinical trials are now needed to determine the place VA-ECMO in cardiogenic shock treatment strategies.

Background Management of the increasing number of sensitized heart transplant candidates has become a recurrent issue. Rather than using pretransplant desensitization therapies, we used a posttransplant prophylactic strategy. Our aim was to describe outcomes in transplant recipients with preformed donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (pfDSA) managed with this strategy. Methods A posttransplant protocol was applied to patients transplanted with pfDSA, consisting of perioperative management of DSA (polyvalent immunoglobulins +/- perioperative plasmapheresis sessions, according to DSA level, as well as induction therapy) and systematic treatment of subsequent antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), even when subclinical. We performed a retrospective analysis of this prospective protocol. The study included all consecutive first recipients of a noncombined heart transplant performed between 2009 and 2015 at our center. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints included primary graft dysfunction, early posttransplant bleeding, rejection, and cardiac allograft vasculopathy-free survival. Results A total of 523 patients were studied, including 88 (17%) and 194 (37%) transplanted with DSA mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of 500 to 1000 and greater than 1000, respectively. The median follow-up period was 4.06 years. Survival was not significantly different between groups. Rejection-free survival was worse in patients with pfDSA MFI >1000, evidenced by a fourfold increase in the risk of antibody-mediated rejection. The incidence of primary graft dysfunction and cardiac allograft vasculopathy-free survival did not significantly differ between groups. Perioperative plasmapheresis increased the risk for transfusion of packed red blood cells. Conclusions This exclusively posttransplant prophylactic strategy achieved favorable outcomes in heart transplant recipients with pfDSA.

In patients who are admitted to an intensive care unit after resuscitation from cardiac arrest (CA) mortality attains 60–70% [1]. Two-thirds of these deaths are due to hypoxic-ischaemic brain injury (HIBI) and occur mainly after 72 h, as a result of withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (WLST) based on the prediction of a poor neurological outcome [2]. The second most common cause of post-resuscitation death, especially in the very early phase after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), is circulatory failure. Current research on post-resuscitation care focuses on interventions aimed at reducing these two important causes of morbidity and mortality after CA.\ud \ud

Background Structural neurological complications (ischemic stroke and intracranial bleeding) and their risk factors in patients receiving venoarterial-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) are poorly described. Our objective was to describe frequencies, outcomes and risk factors for neurological complications (ischemic stroke and intracranial bleeding) in patients receiving VA-ECMO. Methods Retrospective observational study conducted, from 2006 to 2014, in a tertiary referral center on patients who developed a neurological complication(s) on VA-ECMO. Results Among 878 VA-ECMO-treated patients, 65 (7.4%) developed an ECMO-related brain injury: 42 (5.3%) ischemic strokes and 20 (2.8%) intracranial bleeding, occurring after a median [25th;75th percentile] of 11 [6;18] and 5 [2;9] days of support, respectively. Intracranial bleeding but not ischemic stroke was associated with higher mortality. Multivariable analysis retained only platelet level > 350 giga/L as being associated with ischemic stroke. Female sex, central VA-ECMO and platelets

IntroductionInternational guidelines include early nutritional support (≤48 hour after admission), 20–25 kcal/kg/day, and 1.2–2 g/kg/day protein at the acute phase of critical illness. Recent data challenge the appropriateness of providing standard amounts of calories and protein during acute critical illness. Restricting calorie and protein intakes seemed beneficial, suggesting a role for metabolic pathways such as autophagy, a potential key mechanism in safeguarding cellular integrity, notably in the muscle, during critical illness. However, the optimal calorie and protein supply at the acute phase of severe critical illness remains unknown. NUTRIREA-3 will be the first trial to compare standard calorie and protein feeding complying with guidelines to low-calorie low-protein feeding. We hypothesised that nutritional support with calorie and protein restriction during acute critical illness decreased day 90 mortality and/or dependency on intensive care unit (ICU) management in mechanically ventilated patients receiving vasoactive amine therapy for shock, compared with standard calorie and protein targets.Methods and analysisNUTRIREA-3 is a randomised, controlled, multicentre, open-label trial comparing two parallel groups of patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation and vasoactive amine therapy for shock and given early nutritional support according to one of two strategies: early calorie-protein restriction (6 kcal/kg/day-0.2–0.4 g/kg/day) or standard calorie-protein targets (25 kcal/kg/day, 1.0–1.3 g/kg/day) at the acute phase defined as the first 7 days in the ICU. We will include 3044 patients in 61 French ICUs. Two primary end-points will be evaluated: day 90 mortality and time to ICU discharge readiness. The trial will be considered positive if significant between-group differences are found for one or both alternative primary endpoints. Secondary outcomes include hospital-acquired infections and nutritional, clinical and functional outcomes.Ethics and disseminationThe NUTRIREA-3 study has been approved by the appropriate ethics committee. Patients are included after informed consent. Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberNCT03573739.

Erratum inCorrection to Lancet Respir Med 2021; published online April 19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00096-5.; International audience; Background: In the Île-de-France region (henceforth termed Greater Paris), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was considered early in the COVID-19 pandemic. We report ECMO network organisation and outcomes during the first wave of the pandemic.Methods: In this multicentre cohort study, we present an analysis of all adult patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe ARDS requiring ECMO who were admitted to 17 Greater Paris intensive care units between March 8 and June 3, 2020. Central regulation for ECMO indications and pooling of resources were organised for the Greater Paris intensive care units, with six mobile ECMO teams available for the region. Details of complications (including ECMO-related complications, renal replacement therapy, and pulmonary embolism), clinical outcomes, survival status at 90 days after ECMO initiation, and causes of death are reported. Multivariable analysis was used to identify pre-ECMO variables independently associated with 90-day survival after ECMO.Findings: The 302 patients included who underwent ECMO had a median age of 52 years (IQR 45-58) and Simplified Acute Physiology Score-II of 40 (31-56), and 235 (78%) of whom were men. 165 (55%) were transferred after cannulation by a mobile ECMO team. Before ECMO, 285 (94%) patients were prone positioned, median driving pressure was 18 cm H2O (14-21), and median ratio of the partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen was 61 mm Hg (IQR 54-70). During ECMO, 115 (43%) of 270 patients had a major bleeding event, 27 of whom had intracranial haemorrhage; 130 (43%) of 301 patients received renal replacement therapy; and 53 (18%) of 294 had a pulmonary embolism. 138 (46%) patients were alive 90 days after ECMO. The most common causes of death were multiorgan failure (53 [18%] patients) and septic shock (47 [16%] patients). Shorter time between intubation and ECMO (odds ratio 0·91 [95% CI 0·84-0·99] per day decrease), younger age (2·89 [1·41-5·93] for ≤48 years and 2·01 [1·01-3·99] for 49-56 years vs ≥57 years), lower pre-ECMO renal component of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (0·67, 0·55-0·83 per point increase), and treatment in centres managing at least 30 venovenous ECMO cases annually (2·98 [1·46-6·04]) were independently associated with improved 90-day survival. There was no significant difference in survival between patients who had mobile and on-site ECMO initiation.Interpretation: Beyond associations with similar factors to those reported on ECMO for non-COVID-19 ARDS, 90-day survival among ECMO-assisted patients with COVID-19 was strongly associated with a centre's experience in venovenous ECMO during the previous year. Early ECMO management in centres with a high venovenous ECMO case volume should be advocated, by applying centralisation and regulation of ECMO indications, which should also help to prevent a shortage of resources.

BACKGROUND Although venous thrombosis after venovenous–extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is well described, vascular complications occurring after venoarterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) removal have not yet been thoroughly described. Our aim was to evaluate the frequency of vascular (arterial and venous) complications after VA-ECMO removal and try to identify the risk factors associated with them. METHODS Retrospective analysis of data prospectively collected in 2 intensive care units was performed. Consecutive patients successfully weaned off VA-ECMO during year 1 were screened for cannula-associated deep vein thrombosis (CaDVT) or arterial complications (arterial thrombosis/stenosis) using Doppler ultrasonography . RESULTS From November 2018 to November 2019, a total of 107 patients with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of 54 (42–63) years and a median (IQR) ECMO support duration of 8 (2–5) days were successfully weaned off VA-ECMO and included. CaDVT occurred in 44 patients (41%), and arterial complications occurred in 15 (14%) (9 acute leg ischemia , 1 arteriovenous femoral fistula , and 5 late femoral stenosis). Multivariable analysis retained longer duration of ECMO support (odds ratio [OR]: 1.12 per day; 95% CI: 1.02–1.22) and infection occurring on ECMO (OR: 3.03; 95% CI: 1.14–8.03) as independent risk factors for CaDVT, whereas older age (OR: 0.97 per year; 95% CI: 0.94–0.99) and previous anti-coagulation use (OR: 0.21; 95% CI: 0.06–0.68) were protective factors for CaDVT. No risk factors for arterial complications were identified. CONCLUSIONS In patients requiring VA-ECMO support, vascular complications occurred frequently after its removal, especially CaDVT. Arterial complications, either early leg ischemia or late arterial stenosis , were observed less often. Strategies aimed at preventing CaDVT after VA-ECMO remain to be determined.

Background: With the COVID-19 pandemic, documenting whether health care workers (HCWs) are at increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 contamination and identifying risk factors is of major concern. Methods: In this multicenter prospective cohort study, HCWs from COVID-19 frontline departments were included in March and April 2020 and followed for 3 months. SARS-CoV-2 serology was performed at month 0 (M0), M1, and M3 and RT-PCR in case of symptoms. The primary outcome was laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (positive serology and/or positive RT-PCR result) at M3. Secondary outcomes were positive serology for SARS-CoV-2 at M0, M1 and M3. Risk factors of laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection at M3 were identified by multivariate logistic regression. Findings: Among 1,062 HCWs (median [interquartile range] age, 33 [28-42] years; 758 [71.4%] women; 321 [30.2%] physicians), the cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection at M3 was 14.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] [12.5; 16.9]). Seroprevalence at M0, M1, and M3 was 5.9% [4.7; 7.5], 12.9% [10.9; 15.1] and 13.0% [11.1; 15.2], respectively. Risk factors were the working department specialty, with increased risk for intensive care units (odds ratio 1.80, 95%CI [0.38; 8.58]), emergency departments (3.91 [0.83; 18.43]) and infectious diseases departments (4.22 [0.92; 18.28]); active smoking was associated with reduced risk (0.36 [0.21; 0.63]). Age, sex, professional category, number of years of experience in the job or department, and public transportation use were not significantly associated with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection at M3. Interpretation: The rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection in frontline HCWs was 14.6% at the end of the first COVID-19 wave in Paris and occurred mainly early. Seroprevalence in May was higher than in the general population. The study argues for an origin of professional in addition to private life contamination and therefore including HCWs in the first-line vaccination target population. It also highlights that smokers were at lower risk. Trial Registration: The study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04304690 Funding Statement: The sponsor of the study was Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris (AP-HP), with study management by URC Pitie-Salpetriere. This study was funded by the French Ministry of Health (Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique) and the French Agency for Research (Fond d’amorcage de l’Agence National pour la Recherche). Declaration of Interests: None to declare. Ethics Approval Statement: The SEROCOV study was approved by the ethics committee (CPP Sud-Ouest et Outre-Mer I, approval no. 2-20-023 id7257) and all participants signed informed consent before inclusion.

Purpose Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients has increased during the course of the pandemic. As uncertainty existed regarding patient’s outcomes, early guidelines recommended against establishing new ECMO centers. We aimed to explore the epidemiology and outcomes of ECMO for COVID-19 related cardiopulmonary failure in five countries in the Middle East and India and to evaluate the results of ECMO in 5 new centers. Methods This is a retrospective, multicenter international, observational study conducted in 19 ECMO centers in five countries in the Middle East and India from March 1, 2020, to September 30, 2020. We included patients with COVID-19 who received ECMO for refractory hypoxemia and severe respiratory acidosis with or without circulatory failure. Data collection included demographic data, ECMO-related specific data, pre-ECMO patient condition, 24 h post-ECMO initiation data, and outcome. The primary outcome was survival to home discharge. Secondary outcomes included mortality during ECMO, survival to decannulation, and outcomes stratified by center type. Results Three hundred and seven COVID-19 patients received ECMO support during the study period, of whom 78 (25%) were treated in the new ECMO centers. The median age was 45 years (interquartile range IQR 37–52), and 81% were men. New center patients were younger, were less frequently male, had received higher PEEP, more frequently inotropes and prone positioning before ECMO and were less frequently retrieved from a peripheral center on ECMO. Survival to home discharge was 45%. In patients treated in new and established centers, survival was 55 and 41% (p = 0.03), respectively. Multivariable analysis retained only a SOFA score

Background The most severe form of arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy in adults— refractory cardiogenic shock requiring mechanical circulatory support—has rarely been reported. Objective The purpose of this study was to describe the management of critically ill patients admitted for acute, nonischemic, or worsening of previously known cardiac dysfunction and recent-onset supraventricular arrhythmia who developed refractory cardiogenic shock requiring venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). Methods This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Results Between 2004 and 2018, 35 patients received VA-ECMO for acute, nonischemic cardiogenic shock and recent supraventricular arrhythmia (77% atrial fibrillation [AF]). Cardiogenic shock was the first disease manifestation in 21 patients (60%). Characteristics at ECMO implantation [median (interquartile range)] were Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score 10 (7–13); inotrope score 29 (11–80); left ventricular ejection (LVEF) fraction 10% (10%–15%); and lactate level 8 (4–11) mmol/L. For 12 patients, amiodarone and/or electric cardioversion successfully reduced arrhythmia, improved LVEF, and enabled weaning off VA-ECMO; 11 had long-term survival without transplantation or long-term assist device. Eight patients experiencing arrhythmia-reduction failure underwent ablation procedures (7 atrioventricular node [AVN] with pacing, 1 atrial tachycardia) and were weaned off VA-ECMO; 7 survived. Of the remaining 15 patients without arrhythmia reduction or ablation, only the 6 bridged to heart transplantation or left ventricular (LV) assist device survived. Conclusion Arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy, mainly AF-related, is an underrecognized cause of refractory cardiogenic shock and should be considered in patients with nonischemic cardiogenic shock and recent-onset supraventricular arrhythmia. VA-ECMO support allowed safe arrhythmia reduction or rate control by AVN ablation while awaiting recovery, even among those with severe LV dilation.

This cross-sectional study evaluates reports of patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation published in online media to systematically assess how mortality and disability attributed to this therapy were portrayed.

Summary Background Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) dosage required to reach circulating levels that inhibit SARS-Cov-2 are extrapolated from pharmacokinetic data in non-COVID-19 patients. Methods We performed a population-pharmacokinetic analysis from 104 consecutive COVID-19 hospitalized patients (31 in intensive care units, 73 in medical wards, n = 149 samples). Plasma HCQ concentration were measured using high performance liquid chromatography with fluorometric detection. Modelling used Monolix-2019R2. Results HCQ doses ranged from 200 to 800 mg/day administered for 1 to 11 days and median HCQ plasma concentration was 151 ng/mL. Among the tested covariates, only bodyweight influenced elimination oral clearance (CL) and apparent volume of distribution (Vd). CL/F (F for unknown bioavailability) and Vd/F (relative standard-error, %) estimates were 45.9 L/h (21.2) and 6690 L (16.1). The derived elimination half-life (t1/2) was 102 h. These parameters in COVID-19 differed from those reported in patients with lupus, where CL/F, Vd/F and t1/2 are reported to be 68 L/h, 2440 L and 19.5 h, respectively. Within 72 h of HCQ initiation, only 16/104 (15.4%) COVID-19 patients had HCQ plasma levels above the in vitro half maximal effective concentration of HCQ against SARS-CoV-2 (240 ng/mL). HCQ did not influence inflammation status (assessed by C-reactive protein) or SARS-CoV-2 viral clearance (assessed by real-time reverse transcription-PCR nasopharyngeal swabs). Conclusion The interindividual variability of HCQ pharmacokinetic parameters in severe COVID-19 patients was important and differed from that previously reported in non-COVID-19 patients. Loading doses of 1600 mg HCQ followed by 600 mg daily doses are needed to reach concentrations relevant to SARS-CoV-2 inhibition within 72 hours in ≥ 60% (95% confidence interval: 49.5–69.0%) of COVID-19 patients.

Background While recommended by international societal guidelines in the paediatric population, the use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) as mechanical circulatory support for refractory septic shock in adults is controversial. We aimed to characterise the outcomes of adults with septic shock requiring VA ECMO, and identify factors associated with survival. Methods We searched Pubmed, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane databases from inception until 1st June 2021, and included all relevant publications reporting on > 5 adult patients requiring VA ECMO for septic shock. Study quality and certainty in evidence were assessed using the appropriate Joanna Briggs Institute checklist, and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach, respectively. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge, and secondary outcomes included intensive care unit length of stay, duration of ECMO support, complications while on ECMO, and sources of sepsis. Random-effects meta-analysis (DerSimonian and Laird) were conducted. Data synthesis We included 14 observational studies with 468 patients in the meta-analysis. Pooled survival was 36.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 23.6%–50.1%). Survival among patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 35% (32.1%, 95%-CI: 8.69%–60.7%, p = 0.05). Survival reported in studies from Asia (19.5%, 95%-CI: 13.0%–26.8%) was notably lower than those from Europe (61.0%, 95%-CI: 48.4%–73.0%) and North America (45.5%, 95%-CI: 16.7%–75.8%). GRADE assessment indicated high certainty of evidence for pooled survival. Conclusions When treated with VA ECMO, the majority of patients with septic shock and severe sepsis-induced myocardial depression survive. However, VA ECMO has poor outcomes in adults with septic shock without severe left ventricular depression. VA ECMO may be a viable treatment option in carefully selected adult patients with refractory septic shock.

International audience

Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use for severe Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients has evolved during the course of the pandemic. Early uncertainty regarding the role of ECMO during the current pandemic was based on the suboptimal initial experiences. However, more recent data suggests favorable outcomes in COVID-19 patients receiving ECMO support. We aimed to explore the epidemiology and outcomes of ECMO for COVID-19 related cardiopulmonary failure and evaluate outcomes of new centers versus established ones. Methods: This is a retrospective, multicenter international, observational study conducted in (19) ECMO centers in five countries from March 1, 2020, to September 30, 2020. We included 307 patients with COVID-19 who received ECMO for refractory hypoxemia and severe respiratory acidosis with or without circulatory failure. Data collection included Patients characteristics, demographic data, ECMO-related specific data, pre-ECMO patient condition, 24 hours post-ECMO initiation data, and outcome. The primary outcome is survival to home discharge. Secondary outcomes include mortality during ECMO, survival to decannulation, and outcomes stratified by center type in which patients were treated. Findings: Three hundred and seven COVID-19 patients received ECMO support during the study period. The median age was 45 years (37-52 IQR), and 81% were men. 178 (58%) patients survived ECMO, of whom 138 (45%) patients were discharged home, and 40 patients (13%) died post-ECMO decannulation while 128 patients (41.7%) died during ECMO. Patient outcomes in the new centers developed in response to the pandemic were similar to those of established centers. Interpretation: During pandemics, ECMO may provide favorable outcomes in highly select patients as resources allow. Outcomes in ECMO centers established during the pandemic were comparable to existing centers. Funding Statement: None. Declaration of Interests: Kiran Shekar acknowledges research support from the Metro North Hospital and Health Service and the Prince Charles Hospital Foundation. Dr. Brodie receives research support from ALung Technologies. He has been on the medical advisory boards for Baxter, Abiomed, Xenios, and Hemovent and is the President-Elect of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO). Dr. Combes reported receiving grants and personal fees from Maquet, Xenios, and Baxter and serving as the recent past president of the EuroELSO organization. Other authors have no conflict of interest. Ethics Approval Statement: After the SWAAC ELSO steering committee's authorization, IRB approval was obtained from the coordinating center King Saud Medical City in Riyadh - Saudi Arabia. The country representatives obtained IRB approval for each participating center as well.

International audience

Background Data on incidence, clinical presentation and outcomes of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation (MV) are limited. Methods Case series of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia admitted to a single ICU in France. All consecutive patients requiring MV with RT-PCR–confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection between March 12th and April 24th, 2020 were included. Frequency, clinical characteristics, responsible pathogens and outcomes of VAP were assessed, and compared to an historical cohort of patients with severe influenza-associated pneumonia requiring MV admitted to the same ICU during the preceding three winter seasons. Results Fifty-four consecutive patients with COVID-19–associated respiratory failure requiring MV were included (median (IQR) age 48 (42–58) years; 74% male; 93% requiring veno-venous ECMO). VAP occurred in 46 (85%) of them (median (IQR) prior MV duration before the first episode, 11 (8–16) days) (Table 1). Pathogens responsible for VAP were predominantly Enterobacteriaceae (72%), and particularly inducible AmpC-cephalosporinase producers (41%), followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (35%) (Table 2). Pulmonary infection recurrence and death were observed in 46 (85%) and 17 (31%) patients, respectively. Details on recurrent episodes and pathogens responsible for recurrences are given in Table 3. Most recurrences were relapse (i.e. infection with the same pathogen), with a high proportion occurring during antimicrobial treatment despite its adequacy. Despite a high rate of P. aeruginosa VAP in patients with influenza-associated ARDS, pulmonary infection recurrence rate was significantly lower than in patients with COVID-19. Overall mortality was similar in the two groups. Baseline characteristics of patients Characteristics of first ventilator-associated pneumonia episode Characteristics of recurrent VAP episodes in Covid-19 and influenza patients. Conclusion Patients with severe COVID-19–associated respiratory failure requiring MV had a very high late-onset VAP rate. Inducible AmpC cephalosporinase–producing Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa appeared to be frequently responsible for VAP, with multiple subsequent episodes and difficulties to eradicate the pathogen from the lung. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Background Prone positioning (PP) during veno-venous ECMO is feasible, but its physiological effects have never been thoroughly evaluated. Our objectives were to describe, through electrical impedance tomography (EIT), the impact of PP on global and regional ventilation, and optimal PEEP level. Methods A monocentric study conducted on ECMO-supported severe ARDS patients, ventilated in pressure-controlled mode, with 14-cmH2O driving pressure and EIT-based “optimal PEEP”. Before, during and after a 16-h PP session, EIT-based distribution and variation of tidal impedance, VTdorsal/VTglobal ratio, end-expiratory lung impedance (EELI) and static compliance were collected. Subgroup analyses were performed in patients who increased their static compliance by ≥ 3 mL/cmH2O after 16 h of PP. Results For all patients (n = 21), tidal volume and EELI were redistributed from ventral to dorsal regions during PP. EIT-based optimal PEEP was significantly lower in PP than in supine position. Median (IQR) optimal PEEP decreased from 14 (12–16) to 10 (8–14) cmH2O. Thirteen (62%) patients increased their static compliance by ≥ 3 mL/cmH2O after PP on ECMO. This subgroup had higher body mass index, more frequent viral pneumonia, shorter ECMO duration, and lower baseline VTdorsal/VTglobal ratio than patients with compliance ≤ 3 mL/cmH2O (P Conclusion Although baseline tidal volume distribution on EIT may predict static compliance improvement after PP on ECMO, our results support physiological benefits of PP in all ECMO patients, by modifying lung mechanics and potentially reducing VILI. Further studies, including a randomized–controlled trial, are now warranted to confirm potential PP benefits during ECMO.