Search

Purpose: Metastatic hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer is an important cause of cancer mortality. Endocrine treatment with or without additional targeted therapies has been the mainstay of treatment. This trial was designed to evaluate the combination of fulvestrant plus everolimus versus fulvestrant, everolimus, and anastrozole compared with fulvestrant alone in the first-line treatment of advanced HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Patients and Methods: This randomized placebo-controlled trial included postmenopausal women with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who had received no prior systemic therapy for metastatic disease. Participants were randomized to one of three treatment arms and the primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS), comparing combinations of fulvestrant and everolimus with or without anastrozole with fulvestrant alone. Circulating tumor cells (CTC), as measured with two different methods, and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) were evaluated serially prior to treatment and the beginning of the second cycle of therapy. Results: Due in part to changes in clinical practice, the study was closed after accruing only 37 participants. There was no evidence that everolimus-containing combination treatment improved PFS or overall survival relative to fulvestrant alone. When modeled continuously, an association was observed of baseline CTC and ctDNA with poorer survival. Conclusions: Although power of the study was limited, the findings were unable to support the routine use of everolimus combination endocrine therapy in the first-line treatment of advanced hormone-sensitive breast cancer. Prognostic impact of baseline ctDNA and copy-number variations in CTC was demonstrated.

Chemotherapy is often difficult to treat human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic recurrent breast cancer in the elderly, and no standard treatment has been established at this point. We experienced a case in which trastuzumab (Tmab) + anastrozole (ANA) was ineffective (progressive disease; PD) in elderly HER2-positive breast cancer with postoperative multiple liver metastases, but T-DM1 was significantly effective (complete response; CR), and treatment could be continued safely. An 82-year-old woman was referred to our department with a right breast mass. A close examination revealed right breast cancer cT1bN0M0 cStage I, and total mastectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy were performed. The postoperative pathological result was pT1bN0M0 pStage I (luminal HER2 type). The patient was elderly and had no adjuvant treatment after the operation. Approximately 2 years after the operation, multiple liver metastases were observed, and treatment with ANA and Tmab was started. Four months later, MRI showed that the number of multiple liver metastases increased. The patient was diagnosed with PD, and the anti-HER2 drug was changed from trastuzumab to trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). The dose was reduced due to vomiting (grade 3). Two months later, MRI showed that the multiple liver metastases shrank and became obscure after 5 months. After that, T-DM1 was continued, and the disease did not worsen. In elderly people with difficulty in administering chemotherapy, T-DM1 may have a safe and sufficient therapeutic effect by adjusting the dose and managing side effects appropriately.

Background Hormonal therapies are commonly prescribed to patients with metastatic granulosa cell tumours (GCT), based on high response rates in small retrospective studies. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are reported to have high response rates and an accepted treatment option. We report the results of a phase 2 trial of an AI in recurrent/metastatic GCTs. Methods 41 patients with recurrent ER/PR + ve GCT received anastrozole 1 mg daily until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 12 weeks, evaluated by RECIST1.1 criteria. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), CBR duration, quality of life and toxicity. Results The CBR at 12 weeks in 38 evaluable patients was 78.9%, which included one (2.6%; 95% CI: 0.5–13.5%) partial response and 76.3% stable disease. Two additional patients without measurable disease were stable, based on inhibin. Median PFS was 8.6 m (95% CI 5.5–13.5 m). There were delayed responses observed after 12 weeks with a total of 4 pts. (10.5%; 95% CI 4.2%–24.1%) with a RECIST partial response; 23 (59%) patients were progression-free at 6 months. The adverse effects were predominantly low grade. Conclusions This is the first prospective trial of hormonal therapy in GCTs. Although there was a high CBR, the objective response rate to anastrozole was much lower than the pooled response rates of >70% to AIs reported in most retrospective series and case reports. PARAGON demonstrates the importance of prospective trials in rare cancers and the need to reconsider the role of AIs as single agents in GCTs.

This study evaluated the risk of major bleeding associated with concomitant use of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and anticancer drugs (ACDs), which share metabolic pathways, in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and cancer. We performed a retrospective cohort study using Taiwan’s National Health Insurance database and included patients with AF and cancer who received DOAC prescriptions from 1 to 2012 to 31 December 2017. The incidence of major bleeding in person-quarters with concomitant use of DOAC and any of 15 ACDs with inhibitory or competitive effects of CYP3A4 or P-gp activity (docetaxel, vinorelbine, methotrexate, irinotecan, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, imatinib, nilotinib, abiraterone, bicalutamide, tamoxifen, anastrozole, cyclosporine, tacrolimus) was compared with that in person-quarters with DOAC alone. Adjusted incidence-rate differences between DOAC use with and without concurrent ACDs were estimated using Poisson regression models weighted by the inverse probability of treatment. In 13,158 patients with AF and cancer (76.9 ± 8.9 years; male 60%), 1545 major bleeding events occurred during 90,540 DOAC-exposed person-quarters. Concurrent use of DOAC and any of 15 ACDs occurred in only 18% of patients. Compared with use of DOAC alone, concomitant use of DOAC and these ACDs was not associated with an increased risk of major bleeding. Co-medication with DOAC and ACDs with inhibitory or competitive effects on CYP3A4 or P-gp activity was not associated with a higher risk of major bleeding than DOAC alone. Our findings may provide clinicians with confidence regarding the safety of concurrent use of DOAC and ACDs in patients with AF and cancer.

For postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer, the most effective duration for adjuvant therapy with an aromatase inhibitor remains unclear.In this prospective, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer who had received 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy to receive the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole for an additional 2 years (2-year group, receiving a total of 7 years) or an additional 5 years (5-year group, receiving a total of 10 years). The primary end point was disease-free survival. The primary analysis included all the patients who were still participating in the trial and who had no recurrence 2 years after randomization (i.e., when treatment in the 2-year group had ended). Secondary end points were overall survival, contralateral breast cancer, second primary cancer, and clinical bone fracture.Among the 3484 women who were enrolled in the trial, 3208 remained in the trial without disease progression after the first 2 years of extended anastrozole treatment following randomization. Among these women, disease progression or death occurred in 335 women in each treatment group in the primary-analysis set at 8 years (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85 to 1.15; P = 0.90). No between-group differences occurred in most secondary end points, and subgroup analyses did not indicate differences in any particular subgroup. The risk of clinical bone fracture was higher in the 5-year group than in the 2-year group (hazard ratio, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.84).In postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer who had received 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy, extending hormone therapy by 5 years provided no benefit over a 2-year extension but was associated with a greater risk of bone fracture. (Funded by AstraZeneca and the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group; ABCSG-16/SALSA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00295620.).

Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) is defined as infiltration of the leptomeninges by metastatic carcinoma and often represents the end stage of cancer disease. In breast cancer, LC is associated with a median survival of approximately 6-8 weeks without specific treatment. It could increase by only few months with personalized treatment plans. Usually, the median time of onset of leptomeningeal spread is 18 months and it is diagnosed in up to 70% of patients with active and progressive systemic disease. We present an uncommon case of LC in a patient with history of breast cancer with a 10 year-disease-free condition and an overall survival after LC diagnosis of 10 months. Central Nervous System (CNS) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) showed contrast enhancement of medullary cone and cauda. Despite the negativity of cytological analysis of Cerebral-Spinal Fluid (CSF), the patient underwent meningeal and radicular biopsy in November 2019. The neuropathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of LC. The patient was started on the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole. A whole body contrast Computed Tomography (CT) scan at three months follow-up was negative for further disease dissemination. The patient is currently under oncological and radiological follow-up after more than 10 months from diagnosis. Although nowadays diagnosis of LC is prompted by cytological examination of CSF, its negativity should not halt the diagnostic process. In the presence of a high clinical suspicion of LC, we suggest the biopsy of lesion.

Objective To report the first case of secondary azoospermia after sleeve gastrectomy. Design Case report. Setting Academic male infertility clinic. Patient(s) A 33-year-old man with secondary azoospermia and primary testicular failure with testosterone deficiency after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Intervention(s) Hormonal therapy with anastrozole for 10 months and diagnostic testicular biopsy. Main Outcome Measure(s) Semen analyses and testicular histopathology. Result(s) Non-obstructive azoospermia persisted at 20 months after surgery despite hormonal therapy with anastrozole. Testicular histopathology revealed the presence of Sertoli cells only. Conclusion(s) Although further research is need to determine the relationship between sleeve gastrectomy and secondary infertility, men should be informed of the potentially deleterious effects of this surgery on semen parameters.

Zerko Wako,1 Daniel Mengistu,2 Negalign Getahun Dinegde,2 Tseganesh Asefa,1 Mulugeta Wassie1 1Department of Medical Nursing, School of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Science, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia; 2School of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health Science, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, EthiopiaCorrespondence: Zerko Wako Tel +251918728268Email zerkowako1992@gmail.comBackground: In breast cancer patients, adherence to adjuvant hormone therapy (AHT) is uncertain. Seven in every 10 patients were hormone receptor positive and adjuvant hormone therapy (AHT) is prescribed for 5– 10 years for a woman with breast cancer. Therefore, the aim of this research was to examine adherence to adjuvant hormone therapy and related factors among women with breast cancer attending the Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital Oncology Center.Methods: An institutional-based cross-sectional study was conducted from March to April, 2019. Systematic random sampling technique was used to select participants. A semi-structured questionnaire was used. Medication possession ratio (MPR) was used where score ≥ 80% was adherence. Data were entered in EpiData version 4.4.2.1 and transferred to SPSS version 25, and analyzed using binary logistic regression.Results: Out of 216 women with breast cancer 209 participated in the study with a response rate of 97%. The overall adherence in this study was 77.5%. Getting social support (OR=3.959, 95%CI: 1.570– 9.980), being on anastrozole (OR=0.139, 95%CI: 0.040– 0.485), getting a thorough therapeutic communication about treatment (OR=4.590, 95%CI: 1.061– 19.863), undergoing mastectomy (OR=0.215, 95%CI: 0.059– 0.788), having side effects (OR=0.210, 95%CI: 0.085– 0.517) were found to be significantly associated with adherence to AHT.Conclusion: In general, the overall adherence to AHT was 77.5% for women with breast cancer. Factors such as types of adjuvant hormone therapy, lack of side effects, mastectomy, getting social support, and thorough therapeutic communication were strongly linked with adherence to them.Keywords: adherence, adjuvant hormone therapy, breast cancer, Ethiopia

This post hoc analysis of MONARCH 2 and MONARCH 3 assesses the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of abemaciclib in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) in East Asian patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2‐negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer. MONARCH 2 and MONARCH 3 are global, randomized, double‐blind, phase 3 studies of abemaciclib/placebo + fulvestrant and abemaciclib/placebo + nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI, anastrozole or letrozole), respectively. The East Asian population comprised 212 (31.7%) of the 669 intent‐to‐treat (ITT) population in the MONARCH 2 trial and 144 (29.2%) of the 493 ITT patients in the MONARCH 3 trial. In the East Asian population, median progression‐free survival (PFS) was significantly prolonged in the abemaciclib arm compared with placebo in both MONARCH 2 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.520; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.362 to 0.747; P, Abemaciclib in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) in the East Asian populations of MONARCH 2 and MONARCH 3 improved efficacy for patients with HR+, HER2− advanced breast cancer.

The population pharmacokinetics (popPK) of ribociclib and population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationship between ribociclib and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) were characterized in patients with cancer. PopPK and ANC PK/PD modeling were both conducted in 2 rounds per data availability. Initial models were developed based on data sets from early-phase trials and qualified using external data from the phase III MONALEESA-2 trial. The second round of analyses was performed using updated data sets that included 2 more phase III trials (MONALEESA-3 and -7). The popPK and ANC PK/PD models adequately described the data and demonstrated reasonable predictive ability. Covariate analysis showed that ribociclib PK were not affected by age, sex, race, baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status (grade 1), mild/moderate renal impairment, mild hepatic impairment, or concomitant use of combination partners, including aromatase inhibitors (letrozole, anastrozole) or fulvestrant, proton-pump inhibitors, or weak cytochrome P450 3A4/5 inhibitors. Body weight had no impact on ribociclib clearance to warrant dose adjustment. The ANC PK/PD relationship was not affected by age, weight, sex, race, baseline ECOG status (grade 1), or concomitant use of letrozole, anastrozole, or fulvestrant. The PK/PD analysis confirmed reversibility of ribociclib's effect on ANC; it also suggested that lowering the dose of ribociclib would mitigate ANC decrease and neutropenia risk. The popPK and ANC PK/PD analyses support the use of ribociclib in combination with an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer without dose adjustment in subpopulations, and the use of dose interruption/reduction to mitigate potential treatment-emergent neutropenia.

Importance Findings in this work might provide certain guidance for current clinical work. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these drugs based on the Bayesian network meta-analysis. Evidence review Two researchers systematically and comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, and the central databases of the Cochrane Library from inception to September 15, 2020. The number of specific events and sample size were extracted from each of the included studies. This Bayesian theory-based network meta-analysis included indirect comparisons and mixed treatment analysis. Indirect comparisons compare the efficacy of at least three interventions simultaneously and are mostly used when there are few direct comparison studies. In addition, indirect comparisons are conducted on the basis of direct comparisons through mixed treatment analysis, which can thus improve the accuracy of analysis. Findings A total of nine randomized controlled trials involving 60,732 participants were included. As a result, compared with placebo in high-risk pre- or postmenopausal women, endocrine therapy (ET) decreased the risks of total breast cancer (TBC, odds ratio [OR] 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56-0.85), invasive breast cancer (IBC, OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.53-0.89), estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer (ER+BC) (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.38-0.64), and ductal carcinoma in situ (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.56-0.98), but increased the risks of pulmonary embolism (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.05-1.69), total venous thrombosis (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.28-2.38), and endometrial carcinoma (EC, OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.17-2.88). In further network stratification analyses, anastrozole, exemestane, and tamoxifen were found to decrease the risks of TBC, IBC, and ER + BC relative to placebo. Similarly, raloxifene decreased the risk of IBC (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.48-0.85), while tamoxifen increased the risk of EC (OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.10-7.35). Conclusions and relevance To sum up, ET decreased the risks of TBC, IBC, ER + BC, and ductal carcinoma in situ, while increasing the risks of pulmonary embolism, total venous thrombosis, and EC in high-risk pre- or postmenopausal women. Meanwhile, anastrozole, exemestane, and tamoxifen possibly exerted potential protective effects on TBC, IBC and ER + BC. Typically, raloxifene might be effective on IBC, while tamoxifen might increase the risk of EC. Therefore, clinicians should fully weigh the benefits and risks of ET to develop a rational individualized treatment.

BackgroundAromatase inhibitors are standard of care for low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas (LGESS), based on very high response rates reported in retrospective studies. We evaluated the activity of anastrozole in recurrent/metastatic LGESS patients enrolled in PARAGON, a basket trial of anastrozole in estrogen receptor (ER±)/progesterone receptor (PR+) gynecological cancers.MethodAn investigator-initiated, single-arm, prospective open-label trial of anastrozole 1 mg/day in patients with ER ± PR + ve LGESS with measurable disease, treated until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was clinical benefit (complete/partial response + stable disease) rate (CBR) at 3 months. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS), quality of life and toxicity.Results15 eligible patients were enrolled. CBR at 3 months was 73% (95% CI: 48–89.1%); unchanged at 6 months. Best response was 26.7%, including complete response in one (6.7%; 95% CI 1.2–29.8%), partial response in three (20%, 95% CI 7.1–45.2%) and stable disease in seven (46.7%). Four patients ceased treatment by 3 months due to progression. Median PFS was not reached (25th percentile: 2.9 months (95% CI: 1.2–NR)). PFS was 73.3%, 73.3% and 66% at 6, 12, and 18 months, respectively. Six patients remained on treatment for an average of 44.2 months (range 34.5–63.6) up until data cut. Toxicity was as expected, with 3 patients stopping due to adverse effects.ConclusionThe 26.7% objective response rate with anastrozole is lower than reported in retrospective series, but the CBR was high and durable. The results underscore the importance of prospective trials in rare cancers.KeywordsAromatase inhibitorsAnastrazoleEndometrial stromalsarcomasUterine sarcoma

Background Adjuvant endocrine therapy is recommended for the treatment of hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer. Aromatase inhibitors are associated with significant musculoskeletal adverse effects, likely through growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor 1 modulation, while tamoxifen reduces insulin-like growth factor 1 production. We describe the case of a patient who was treated successfully with tamoxifen for her hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer and acromegaly. Case presentation A 57-year old White female with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer was diagnosed with acromegaly. She received adjuvant endocrine therapy with anastrozole but could not tolerate this medication because of severe arthralgia, so she was switched to tamoxifen. Shortly after starting tamoxifen, the patient’s musculoskeletal symptoms resolved and her insulin-like growth factor 1 levels normalized. She has remained in remission of her acromegaly and breast cancer since initiating tamoxifen. Conclusion This case highlights the dual benefit of tamoxifen therapy in the treatment of hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer and acromegaly. Unlike anastrozole, tamoxifen has the benefit of lowering insulin-like growth factor 1 levels, which underscores its advantage in reducing adverse musculoskeletal symptoms during the treatment of hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer. We offer the first reported use of tamoxifen monotherapy for the successful treatment of acromegaly and hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer. While tamoxifen may offer an additional, oral option for acromegaly patients who do not respond to or tolerate conventional growth-hormone-lowering therapy, additional studies are necessary.

Breast cancer remains the most common cancer in women in the United States. For certain women at high risk for breast cancer, endocrine therapy (ET) can greatly decrease the risk. Tools such as the Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (or Gail Model) and the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study risk calculator are available to help identify women at increased risk for breast cancer. Physician awareness of family history, reproductive and lifestyle factors, dense breast tissue, and history of benign proliferative breast disease are important when identifying high-risk women. The updated US Preventive Services Task Force and American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines encourage primary care providers to identify at-risk women and offer risk-reducing medications. Among the various ETs, which include tamoxifen, raloxifene, anastrozole, and exemestane, tamoxifen is the only one available for premenopausal women aged 35 years and older. A shared decision-making process should be used to increase the usage of ET and must be individualized. This individualized approach must account for each woman's medical history and weigh the benefits and risks of ET in combination with the personal values of the patient.

Background Anastrozole is a non-steroidal fourth generation aromatase inhibitor that stops the conversion of testosterone to estradiol and has been used as empiric medical therapy for the treatment of male infertility in men with an abnormal testosterone-to-estradiol ratio

Background We investigated the association between body mass index (BMI) and breast cancer risk in women at increased risk of breast cancer receiving tamoxifen or anastrozole compared with placebo using data from the International Breast Cancer Intervention Studies [IBIS-I (tamoxifen) and IBIS-II (anastrozole)]. Methods Baseline BMI was calculated from nurse assessed height and weight measurements for premenopausal (n = 3138) and postmenopausal (n = 3731) women in IBIS-I and postmenopausal women in IBIS-II (n = 3787). The primary endpoint was any breast cancer event (invasive and ductal carcinoma in situ). We used Cox proportional hazards regression to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for risk after adjustment for covariates. Results There were 582 (IBIS-I) and 248 (IBIS-II) breast cancer events [median follow-up = 16.2 years (IQR 14.4–17.7) and 10.9 years (IQR 8.8–13.0), respectively]. In adjusted analysis, women with a higher BMI had an increased breast cancer risk in both IBIS-I [HR = 1.06 per 5 kg/m2 (0.99–1.15), p = 0.114] and in IBIS-II [HR per 5 kg/m2 = 1.21 (1.09–1.35), p 2 = 1.14 (1.03–1.26), p = 0.01] but not premenopausal women [adjusted HR per 5 kg/m2 = 0.97 (0.86–1.09), p = 0.628]. There was no interaction between BMI and treatment group for breast cancer risk in either IBIS-I (p = 0.62) or IBIS-II (p = 0.55). Conclusions Higher BMI is associated with greater breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women at increased risk of the disease, but no effect was observed in premenopausal women. The lack of interaction between BMI and treatment group on breast cancer risk suggests women are likely to experience benefit from preventive therapy regardless of their BMI. Trial registration Both trials were registered [IBIS-I: ISRCTN91879928 on 24/02/2006, retrospectively registered (http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN91879928); IBIS-II: ISRCTN31488319 on 07/01/2005, retrospectively registered (http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN31488319)]

Angiosarcoma is a malignant mesenchymal tumor characterized by the presence of vascular endothelial cells. Although rare, angiosarcoma developing in the mammary glands has a poor prognosis. We report a case of breast angiosarcoma with a preoperative diagnosis of late recurrence of breast cancer. A 78-year-old woman noticed a tumor in her right breast and visited our hospital. The patient had undergone breast-conserving surgery and axillary lymph node dissection from the right breast 12 years before the visit. The tumor was diagnosed as T4bN0M0, stage IIIB. Anastrozole was administered as postoperative adjuvant therapy for 5 years; the patient also received 50-Gy whole-breast radiation therapy after surgery. Physical examination during her visit revealed an elevated lesion with blue purpura around the nipple in the right breast. We performed breast ultrasound and detected a well-defined 19.6 × 16.4 × 10.7 mm hypoechoic tumor in the left subareolar area. The patient underwent core needle biopsy (CNB). Based on the CNB specimen findings, she was suspected to experience late local recurrence after surgery. Therefore, she underwent total mastectomy after breast-conserving surgery. A dark-red tumor sized 18 × 12 mm was found in a specimen from the nipple. The pathological diagnosis of the specimen revealed short spindle-shaped tumor cells with strong nuclear pleomorphism and a significant interstitial fibrosis. Immunohistochemistry using D2-40 and CD31 antibodies showed irregular luminal proliferation at the anastomosis, infiltration into the surrounding tissue, and massive necrosis, thereby leading to the diagnosis of breast angiosarcoma. We have reported a case of breast angiosarcoma with a preoperative diagnosis of late recurrence of breast cancer.

Background The aim of this study was to investigate whether the PAM-50-based 46-gene assay carries prognostic value for risk of local recurrence of breast cancer. Methods The Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG) 8 RCT compared 5 years of tamoxifen with tamoxifen for 2 years followed by anastrozole for 3 years in postmenopausal women with endocrine receptor-positive breast cancer. This study included patients from the trial who had breast-conserving surgery for whom tumour blocks were available for PAM-50 analysis. Results Tumour blocks from 1204 patients who had breast-conserving surgery were available for the PAM-50 analysis, and 1034 of these received radiotherapy. After a median follow-up of 10.8 years, 23 local events had been observed, corresponding to an overall local recurrence risk of 2.2 per cent. Univariable competing-risk analysis demonstrated that patients at low risk according to PAM-50 analysis (risk-of-recurrence (ROR) score less than 57) had a significantly lower incidence of local recurrence than those in the high-risk group at 5 years (0.1 (95 per cent c.i. 0 to 0.7) versus 2.2 (0.9 to 4.6) per cent respectively; subhazard ratio (SHR) 17.18, 95 per cent c.i. 2.06 to 142.88; P = 0.009) and 10 years (0.9 (0.4 to 2.0) versus 3.8 (1.9 to 6.6) per cent; SHR 4.76, 1.72 to 13.17; P = 0.003). Multivariable analyses that included ROR score, age, tumour size, nodal status, type of surgery, tumor grade, and trial-specific endocrine therapy confirmed that ROR score was an independent prognostic factor for risk of local recurrence. Analysis of the women randomized to radiotherapy or control after breast conservation showed that PAM-50 was not predictive of radiotherapy effect. Conclusion PAM-50 can be used as a prognostic tool for local recurrence risk in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy. The test was not predictive for the benefit of radiotherapy.

Introduction: Given the recent advances in early detection, improving access to care and the introduction of more effective anti-cancer medications including endocrine therapy, targeted and immunotherapy, more women with breast cancer survive their disease. Majority of patients with breast cancer express hormone receptors (estrogen and or progesterone receptors) on cancer cells. Aromatase inhibitors (AI) are the gold standard treatment of hormone-sensitive postmenopausal women with breast cancer. Several studies had documented the accelerated bone loss associated with AI. The use of bone modifying agents like bisphosphonates and denosumab had resulted in significant improvement in bone mineral density among females treated with AI. In this paper, we study the efficacy of implementing a comprehensive program on bone health for such patients. Patients and Methods: Postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive early-stage breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy (ET) were included. A comprehensive bone health program was implemented. The program includes extensive counselling by medical oncologist, calcium and vitamin-D supplements, increase milk intake and exercise. Patients with baseline lumbar spine or total hip T-scores ≥ -2 were given short intravenous bisphosphonate infusion every 6 months. Patients with osteoporosis are referred to and followed in a specially designed “osteoporosis clinic”. Results: Between 2013 and 2019, a total of 210 patients fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were enrolled. All were female, median (range) age 67 (43-86) years. All patients had a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of breast cancer, treated and followed up at our institution. High risk patients (n=103, 49.0%) were treated with 6-8 cycles of chemotherapy, including anthracyclines and taxanes. Following the completion of chemotherapy, all patients were treated with endocrine therapy. Patients with low-risk disease (n=107, 51.0%) were treated with upfront endocrine therapy-alone. Aromatase inhibitors, letrozole or anastrozole, were the endocrine therapy of choice in all patients. At baseline, and prior to start of AI, the median T-scores at the hip and lumber spines were -1.0 (range: -3.6, 1.9) and -1.4 (range: -3.9, 2.6), respectively. Osteoporosis was documented in 38 (18.1%) patients while 101 (48.1%) others had osteopenia; none were on any treatment or even aware of their BMD. 46 (25.3%) patients had vitamin-D deficiency while 74 (40.7%) others had vitamin-D insufficiency and none were on prior active replacement therapy or even aware of this problem. Following at least 12-months of endocrine therapy, 32 (84.2%) of patients with osteoporosis and 69 (68.3%) of those with osteopenia had a stable or higher BMD. Thus, the number of patients with osteoporosis declined to 27, 12.9% of the total cohort. On the other hand, 41 (57.7%) of those with normal baseline BMD had a drop in their follow up BMD. Vertebral fractures, presented with back pain and documented by imaging studies, were reported in 3 (11.1%) patients with osteoporosis compared to none in patients with normal BMD, p=0.021. Rib fracture and hip fracture were reported in one patient each and both had normal BMD before and after AI therapy. Conclusions: Postmenopausal women with breast cancer are at risk of osteopenia and osteoporosis. Such risk increases significantly with the use of AI. However, early interventions with modifiable risk factors, Vitamin-D supplements and use of bone-modifying agents can lower this risk. Citation Format: Razan Mansour, Ula Al-Rasheed, Akram Al-Ibraheem, Shereen Abu Jaradeh, Rashid Abdel-Razeq, Rayan Bater, Noor Mashahdani, Shrouq Tbayshat, Hikmat Abdel-Razeq. The efficacy of a comprehensive bone health program in maintaining bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS9-30.

Background: POLARIS is an ongoing, prospective, real world, noninterventional study in patients (pts) with HR+/HER2– ABC receiving PAL. This interim report describes real-world PAL use in preMeno pts. Methods: POLARIS has a targeted enrollment of 1500 pts from ~110 sites in the United States and Canada. Using patient data collected from medical charts and physician surveys, baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns were analyzed descriptively in self-reported preMeno pts with ABC. Results: At the data cutoff of May 20, 2020, 1208 pts were enrolled; 134 (11.1%) from 61 sites were preMeno, of whom 14.2% completed ≥6 months of PAL treatment. Among 134 preMeno pts (74.6%) who received first-line (1L) therapy, 69.0% received PAL+letrozole (LET) or anastrozole, 28.0% PAL+fulvestrant, and 3.0% PAL+exemestane. Median disease-free interval was 39.3 (range: 0 to 236) months; median treatment-free interval was 14.8 (-3 to 134) months. Of 34 pts (25.4%) who received PAL as second or later line (≥2L), 23.8% previously received hormonal therapy, 28.6% chemotherapy, and 14.3% both. The majority of pts (96.27%) initiated PAL at 125 mg regardless of line of therapy (Table). During the first PAL treatment cycle, 2.9% of all preMeno pts, 1% of 1L pts, and 8.8% of ≥2L pts had a dose reduction; 8.2%, 9%, and 5.9%, respectively, had an interruption. Dose reductions/interruptions peaked in cycle 2 (11.9%/15.7%); 56.67% of these modifications were due to adverse events. Conclusions: PAL is routinely prescribed in clinical practice for preMeno women with HR+/HER2- ABC. The majority of preMeno pts in this real-world dataset received PAL+LET as 1L ABC treatment; PAL was primarily initiated at the recommended dose (125 mg) and was well tolerated with few dose modifications required. Clinical trial identification: Pfizer (NCT03280303) Table.CharacteristicFirst-Line Pre/Perimenopausal Patients (n=100)Second or Later Line Pre/Perimenopausal Patients (n=34)Pre/Perimenopausal Patients (N=134)Age at study enrollment, yMedian (range)44 (22-61)42.5 (27-58)44 (22-61)Distribution, n (%) Citation Format: Meghan S Karuturi, Adnan Garrett, Joanne L Blum, Jay Anderson, Erin Jepsen, Timothy Pluard, Thomas Stanton, Kenneth Manning, Joseph C Cappelleri, Faith Beery, Yao Wang, Debu Tripathy. Pre/perimenopausal (preMeno) women receiving palbociclib (PAL) for hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2–) advanced breast cancer (ABC) in a real-world setting: Treatment patterns from POLARIS [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS7-19.

Background: NET is offered to postmenopausal patients (pts) with clinical stage 2/3 ER+/HER2- BC to promote breast-conserving surgery. Also limited surgical accessibility during the COVID19 pandemic has increased NET utility. Inability to identify ET-resistant disease at diagnosis risks disease progression (PD) and delays more effective treatments. Dowsett et al. recently demonstrated that baseline levels of ER, progesterone receptor (PR), Ki67 (>15% vs ≤15%), and Ki67 (>10% vs ≤10%) 2-4 weeks (wks) after starting NET may improve appropriate patient (pt) selection for NET (PMC7280290). The ER, PR and Ki67-based prediction model divides pts with primary ER+/HER2- BC into 3 groups for appropriateness for NET: (Group 1) NET is likely to be inappropriate (Allred ER 10% has been associated with worse outcome (PMC5455353), or (Group 3) NET is appropriate (ER 8 and PgR ≥6). The ALTERNATE trial (NCT01953588) randomized postmenopausal women with clinical stage II or III, ER+ (Allred score 6-8)/HER2- BC to receive anastrozole (ANA), fulvestrant (FUL), or ANA + FUL for 6 months, unless Ki67 was >10% on wk 4 or 12 biopsy, in which case pts were triaged to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) or surgery. As previously reported, the ET-sensitive disease (mPEPI 0 plus pCR) rates were similar across the treatment arms and overall 22% (286 of 1,299) pts had Ki67 >10% at wk 4 or 12. The ALTERNATE trial therefore provides a large independent data set to evaluate the NET appropriateness model. Results: Among 1,299 eligible pts randomized to receive 6 months of NET, 214 were excluded due to absent HR Allred score (n=41) or absence of pre-treatment and wk 4 Ki67 determinations (n=173). The proportions of the remaining 1,085 pts in Group 1, 2 and 3 were 1% (n=10), 43% (n= 468), and 56% (n=607), respectively. On-study Ki67 >10% prompting conversion from NET to NCT/Surgery occurred in: Group 1 90% (9 of 10), Group 2 30% (141 of 468), and Group 3 17% (104 of 607) (Table 1). Among the 1,075 pts in Groups 2 and 3, 260 (24%) pts had Ki67 ≤15% at baseline (BL), among whom only 14 (5.4%) had Ki67 >10% at wk 4, compared to 231 of the 815 (28.3%) who had BL Ki67 >15% and subsequent Ki67 >10% at wk 4. 2% of pts who remained on NET due to on-treatment Ki67 Conclusion: ALTERNATE trial data support a model whereby levels of ER, PR and Ki67 at diagnosis can be used for the identification of postmenopausal pts with primary ER+/HER2- BC who are appropriate for NET. When baseline ER Allred scores are >6 and Ki67 ≤15%, there is a low likelihood of ET-resistant disease. When BL Ki67 is >15%, ET sensitivity is variable, and on-treatment biopsy for Ki67 may assist in triaging regarding NET appropriateness, particularly given the extremely low local PD rates seen in ALTERNATE when on-treatment Ki67 was Table 1 Baseline levels of ER, PR, and Ki67 in Relation to Wk 4 Ki67 (N=1,085)BaselineWeek 4GroupNERAllred ScorePRAllred ScoreKi67Ki67 ≤10%N (%)Ki67 >10%N (%)1N=2615%1 (12.5%)7 (87.5%)2AN=647 or 815%148 (63%)87 (37%)2BN=466 or 7≥6≤15%42 (91.3%)4 (8.7%)51 (30.2)N=1236 or 7≥6>15%76 (61.8%)47 (38.2%)3N=1508≥6≤15%143 (95.3%)7 (4.7%)104 (17.1)N=4578≥6>15%360 (78.8%)97 (21.2%) Citation Format: Matthew J Ellis, Vera Suman, A. Marilyn Leitch, Souzan Sanati, Kiran Vij, Gary W Unzeitig, Jeremy Hoog, Mark Watson, Olwen Hahn, Joseph Guenther, Abigail Caudle, Erika Crouch, Horacio Maluf, Mitch Dowsett, Amy Tiersten, Monica Mita, Wajeeha Razaq, Tina J Hieken, Yang Wang, Travis Dockter, Jo Anne Zujewski, Anna Weiss, Clifford Hudis, Eric P Winer, Kelly Hunt, Ann H Partridge, Cynthia X Ma, Lisa A Carey. Validation of a predictive model for potential response to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) in postmenopausal women with clinical stage II or III estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and HER2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC): An ALTERNATE trial analysis (Alliance A011106) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD2-10.

Background: CTCs are detectable in approximately 50% of pts with metastatic breast cancer, and elevated CTC levels are an independent negative prognostic factor. CTCs have been shown to play a valuable role in predicting outcomes in pts with ABC treated with chemotherapy or endocrine therapy. This phase II trial was conducted to evaluate the clinical benefit (CB) of pazopanib, a VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combined with nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors (NSAIs) in pts with ABC resistant to NSAIs. As an exploratory analysis, we hypothesized that CTC levels might be correlated with response to pazopanib plus endocrine therapy. Methods: Eligibility included postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive (HR+) ABC and progressive disease after at least one month of NSAIs. Treatment was pazopanib 800 mg/day plus either letrozole or anastrozole. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate at 12 weeks (CBR12, wks). Secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS), safety, and the impact of pazopanib and NSAI on CTCs. A CBR of 20% was considered a clinically meaningful comparison to the expected CBR of Results: 32 pts were enrolled; 28 are evaluable for study endpoints. The median age was 58 years (range: 41-77). Pts were heavily pre-treated, with a median of 2 prior hormone therapies (range 1-6) and 1 prior chemotherapy (range 0-8). 8 pts (28.6%) stopped treatment due to adverse events, and 6 pts progressed before wk 12. CBR12 was 46.4% (12 SD, 1 PR), and CBR24 was 25% (5 SD, 2 PR). Safety has been presented (ASCO 2020). Median PFS was 20 wks, and median PFS for pts with CBR12 was 24 wks. Five (22%) of 23 pts with CTC data were CTC-positive (5 CTC/7.5 mL). There was no significant association between CBR12 and CTC status at baseline, or between CBR12 and change in CTC status (baseline to 4 wks after initiation of treatment). 7 pts had non-CBR12 and CTC data; 4 pts (n=4/7; 57%) were CTC positive at either baseline, week 4 or both. 11 pts had CBR12 and CTC data; all patients were CTC negative at baseline and remained negative at 4 wks. 7 pts had PFS >6 months (24, 32, 36, 36, 48, 184 and 274 wks), and 6 had CTC data: all were CTC-negative at baseline and 4 wks, then remained negative at 12 wks. Based on baseline values only, CTC-positive pts had a shorter median PFS compared to CTC-negative pts, but the difference was not statistically significant (11 wks vs 14 wks, p=0.18). Persistently CTC negative patients had significantly longer PFS compared to patients who were CTC positive at any time during study treatment (36 wks vs 11 wks, p=0.01). Conclusions: The addition of pazopanib to NSAIs resulted in a CBR12 of 46.4%, and a CBR24 of 25% in pts with heavily pre-treated ABC resistant to NSAIs. These results support clinical efficacy of antiangiogenic TKI in HR+ ABC and suggest benefit in hormone resistant disease. Consistently negative CTCs correlated with response and response duration. PFS was significantly longer in patients who were consistently CTC negative, further defining the prognostic role of CTCs in HR+ ABC. (NCT01466972) Citation Format: Ozge Gumusay, Mark Jesus M. Magbanua, Melanie C. Majure, Travis Deal, Jonathan R. Renslo, Chiara A. Wabl, Michelle E. Melisko, A. Jo Chien, Andrei Goga, Mark M. Moasser, John W. Park, Jimmy Hwang, Hope S. Rugo. Circulating tumor cell (CTC) enumeration in a phase II trial of pazopanib in addition to endocrine therapy in patients with hormone resistant advanced breast cancer (ABC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS2-19.

Background: In the phase III MONARCH plus study (NCT02763566) the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4&6 inhibitor abemaciclib in combination with non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors (NSAI) or with fulvestrant compared with placebo demonstrated its efficacy and acceptable safety profile at interim analysis in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) locoregionally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. One of the most common treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was diarrhea, typically low grade and of early onset. We will further characterize abemaciclib-associated diarrhea and describe its management in MONARCH plus trial. Methods: MONARCH plus study included two cohorts of patients. Cohort A enrolled patients with initial treatment of endocrine therapy, received abemaciclib or placebo plus NSAI (anastrozole or letrozole); Cohort B enrolled patients who progressed on prior endocrine therapy, receiving abemaciclib or placebo plus fulvestrant. The relative dose intensity was defined as the percentage of actual dose received relative to the planned dose. The severity of diarrhea was reported by investigators and graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 (CTCAE v4.0). Further analysis on diarrhea included time to onset, duration, supportive medication and dose modifications. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as time from randomization to death or progression (RECIST v1.1), and a stratified Cox proportional hazard model was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) between study intervention arm and placebo arm. Results: The median relative dose intensity of abemaciclib in abemaciclib plus NSAI arm and abemaciclib plus fulvestrant arm were 96.77% and 96.30% respectively. In abemaciclib plus NSAI arm and abemaciclib plus fulvestrant arm, the median time to onset of first reported diarrhea was 7 and 6 days and majority of diarrhea events occurred early (66.3% and 71.2% of patients reported diarrhea in Cycle 1 respectively). Diarrhea was typically of low grade (3.9% and 1.9% of patients reported Grade 3 in abemaciclib plus NSAI arm and abemaciclib plus fulvestrant arm, no Grade 4 diarrhea was reported in either arm). Median duration of grade ≥ 3 diarrhea was 2.5 and 3.5 days. Diarrhea was managed by dose adjustments and/or supportive medication (Table 1). Dose reductions were present in 2.0% and 2.9% of patients, and anti-diarrhea therapy was received in 30.2% and 32.7% of patients with abemaciclib plus NSAI and abemaciclib plus fulvestrant arm, respectively. As data cutoff, most diarrhea events were reported as resolved, and the incidence dropped below 10% (Grade 2) and 1% (Grade 3) by Cycle 2 in both arms and kept low incidence over time. Compared to the placebo arm, patients treated with abemaciclib combination who reported diarrhea within the first 7 days (abemaciclib + NSAI, HR [95% CI]: 0.289 [0.166, 0.502]; abemaciclib + fulvestrant, HR [95% CI]: 0.371 [0.213, 0.647]) had significant improvement in PFS. Conclusion: Majority of diarrhea events were of low grade in severity and well managed by anti-diarrheal medications, dose omissions or/and dose reductions in MONARCH plus patients. Table 1. Summary of dose adjustments and supportive medications in patients experiencing diarrheaCohort ACohort BAbemaciclib + NSAIAbemaciclib + FulvestrantN = 205N = 104Diarrhea (any grade), n (%)164 (80.0)82 (78.8)1105 (51.2)52 (50.0)251 (24.9)28 (26.9)38 (3.9)2 (1.9)Outcome, number of events, n796333Recovered/resolved, n (%)757 (95.1)318 (95.5)Not recovered/resolved, n (%)17 (2.1)7 (2.1)Treatment change, n (%)Dose reduction4 (2.0)3 (2.9)Dose omission3 (1.5)3 (2.9)Treatment discontinuation00Anti-diarrhea therapies, n (%)62 (30.2)34 (32.7)loperamide48 (23.4)21 (20.2)berberine6 (2.9)6 (5.8) Citation Format: Zefei Jiang, Xichun Hu, Qingyuan Zhang, Tao Sun, Yongmei Yin, Huiping Li, Min Yan, Zhongsheng Tong, Christina Pimentel Oppermann, Yunpeng Liu, Romulo Costa, Man Li, Xi Chen, Ying Cheng, Quchang Ouyang, Ning Liao, Xiaojia Wang, Xinhong Wu, Jifeng Feng, Roberto Hegg, Govindbabu Kanaka Setty, Amit Agarwal, Jyoti Bajpai, Jing Cheng, Gustavo Girotto, Chanchal Goswami, Wenjing Hu, Jian Huang, MA Coccia Portugal, Jin Yang, Rongsheng Zheng, Fabio Andre Franke, Qiang Liu, Yunjiang Liu, Yongkui Lu, Cristiano Souza, Shiying Yu, Nalini Kilara, Harsha Panchal, Ashish Singh, Shona Nag, Jian Liu, Bernardo Rapoport, Neonyana Keorapetse Rebecca Tabane, Hongxia Wang, Ning Wang, Rubing Han, Wanli Zhang. Management of abemaciclib associated diarrhea in patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: Analysis of the MONARCH plus study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS13-25.

Background: In MONALEESA-3 and MONALEESA-7 trials, ribociclib (RIB, a selective CDK4/6 inhibitor) in combination with endocrine therapy (aromatase inhibitor [AI] or fulvestrant [FUL]) demonstrated a significant prolongation of overall survival among patients with breast cancer (BC), regardless of menopausal status and treatment-line. In the premenopausal or perimenopausal women, RIB + AI/FUL should be combined with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist. The real-world evidence for the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of RIB + AI/FUL in the routine clinical practice is needed to support the use of this combination. Methods: RIBANNA is a prospective, non-interventional study ongoing in Germany since October 2017. Pre-, peri- and postmenopausal women (planned, n = 3020) treated with RIB + AI/FUL, or endocrine monotherapy (ET), or chemotherapy (CT) as the first-line treatment for HR+/HER2- aBC in accordance with German guidelines were included. Data from routine clinical practice in all 3 cohorts, including further lines of sequential therapy, were collected. Updated data on baseline demographics and safety analysis will be presented. Additionally, first experience with CANKADO, an innovative digital and patient-friendly application for electrocardiogram (ECG) measurement, are described. By combining this app to Kardia mobile (AliveCor’s single lead device), single-lead ECG can be recorded and sent via the CANKADO app for a cardiologist to read over. The cardiologist reviews the measurements, and reports the corrected QT interval by Fredericia (QTcF) results towards the trial site. Impact of the use of CANKADO onto the clinical routine will be analyzed. Results: For the second interim analysis, 1141 patients were enrolled until July 12th, 2019, while the full analysis set comprised 813 patients (Table 1). Median duration of RIB exposure in patients on RIB + AI/FUL vs total population was 151 vs 150 days respectively. At cut-off date, patients received first-line (89%, n = 1016), second-line (7%, n = 82), and third-line treatments (1%, n = 11). A starting dose of 600 mg per day for RIB in the first-line setting was seen in most of the patients (85%); data of second-line patients will be reported later. The first-line mean daily dose of RIB was 451.6 mg/day RIB was prescribed mainly in combination with letrozole (75%), fulvestrant (12%), anastrozole (7%), and exemestane (6%). A total of 62% of patients in the study were documented as therapy-naïve for ET. Of 424 patients with early breast cancer, 129 (30%) had documented prior CT without ET. The most common all-grade adverse events frequently noted in RIB + AI/FUL cohort in comparison with other cohorts were nausea (RIB [19%] vs ET [9%] vs CT [11%]), neutropenia (19% vs 1% vs 10%), fatigue (17% vs 9% vs 14%), and leukopenia (14% vs 4% vs 12%). The usage of CANKADO application to assess QTcF was initiated in the year 2019 and first data will be presented. Conclusion: RIBANNA study showed diverse population characteristics among the patients who received RIB treatment in a real-world setting. The third interim analysis is planned in October 2020, and the updated baseline data, information on safety, digital ECG measurement using CANKADO application will be presented. Baseline Demographic Characteristics as of Second Interim AnalysisDemographic VariableRIB + AI/FUL (n = 658)Endocrine Therapy (n = 78)Chemotherapy (n = 77)Mean age, years (SD)67 (11)72 (12)62 (10)Mean time since initial diagnosis, years6.17.23.6T stage at baseline*, n (%)TX204 (31)28 (36)18 (23)T0+T1132 (20)12 (15)11 (14)T2-T4302 (46)35 (45)42 (54)N stage at baseline*, n (%)NX212 (32)29 (37)28 (36)N0+N1317 (48)36 (46)35 (46)N2+N3108 (16)10 (13)8 (10)M stage at baseline*, n (%)MX6 (1)0 (0)0 (0)M018 (3)1 (1)1 (1)M1616 (94)75 (96)71 (92)Metastatic location at baseline*, n (%)CNS, liver, lungs258 (39)14 (18)42 (54)Bone only181 (28)42 (54)11 (14)Skin, lymph nodes, other149 (23)16 (20)14 (18)*Remaining cases are missing.CNS, central nervous system. Citation Format: Achim Wöckel, Cosima Brucker, Thomas Decker, Jörg Falbrede, Helmut Forstbauer, Thomas Göhler, Oliver Hoffmann, Christian Jackisch, Jan Janssen, Andreas Köhler, Kerstin Lüdtke-Heckenkamp, Diana Lüftner, Frederik Marmé, Arnd Nusch, Toralf Reimer, Christian Roos, Marcus Schmidt, Rudolf Weide, Peter Fasching. Real-world efficacy of ribociclib + aromatase inhibitor/fulvestrant, or endocrine monotherapy, or chemotherapy as first-line treatment in women with HR-positive, HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer: Third interim analysis from the RIBANNA study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS10-16.

Background: Adjuvant aromatase inhibitors (AI) reduce recurrence and mortality after early stage hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC). Treatment-related toxicities, including AI-induced musculoskeletal symptoms (AIMSS), are common during adjuvant AI therapy. Prior work suggests the risk of AIMSS is associated with inherited germline genetic polymorphisms in several genes, such as TCL1A, CYP19A1, OPG, and VDR. These pharmacogenetic associations require replication in independent cohorts prior to clinical translation to identify patients at risk for AIMSS. The objective of this retrospective pharmacogenetic analysis was to replicate previously reported associations for candidate germline genetic polymorphisms with AIMSS. Methods: Women with stage 0-III HR+ BC initiating adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) with tamoxifen or an AI were enrolled in a prospective clinic-based observational cohort. The type of ET was selected by the provider. A baseline (BL) blood sample was collected for isolation of germline DNA for pharmacogenetic analysis. AIMSS were assessed by patient-reported outcomes (PRO). Participants completed PROMIS pain interference (PI), PROMIS physical function (PF) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Endocrine Symptoms (FACT-ES) measures at BL and after 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 48 and 60 months (mo). The FACT-ES includes one question about joint pain, rated on a 5-point scale (“not at all” to “very much”). This secondary retrospective pharmacogenetic analysis was conducted in participants receiving AI therapy for whom blood samples and PRO scores at BL and 3 and/or 6 mo were available. For the primary analysis, we defined AIMSS as a ≥4 point increase in PI T score from BL to 3 and/or 6 mo. For secondary analyses, we evaluated alternate definitions of AIMSS including a ≥4 point decrease in PF T score and a ≥1 category increase on the FACT-ES joint pain question from BL to 3 and/or 6 mo. The primary hypothesis was that TCL1A rs11849538 is associated with AIMSS. Twelve other germline variants in CYP19A1, VDR, PIRC66, OPG, ESR1, CYP27B1, CYP17A1, and RANKL previously reported to be associated with AIMSS were also analyzed. We assumed a dominant genetic effect and pre-specified the direction of effect on AIMSS for each variant. We conducted univariate logistic regression to evaluate associations between each definition of AIMSS and candidate polymorphism using an unadjusted α=0.05. Significant univariate associations in the expected direction were adjusted for age, race, body mass index (BMI), prior taxane and type of AI using multivariable logistic regression. Results: Of 182 participants on AI, 143 with PRO and genetic data available were included in this analysis. Median age was 67, 85% were white, median BMI was 27.8 and 27% had prior taxane. 78% received anastrozole, 20% letrozole and 2% exemestane. On primary analysis, participants carrying TCL1A rs11849538 were not more likely to develop AIMSS as defined by increase in PI T score by ≥4 (OR=1.29, 95% CI: 0.55-3.07, p=0.56). None of the other polymorphisms was associated with increase in PI T score by ≥4. On secondary analysis, OPG rs2073618 was associated with AIMSS, as defined by an increase on the FACT-ES joint pain question ≥1 (OR=3.33, 95% CI: 1.48-7.49, p=0.004) and this association maintained significance after covariate adjustment (OR=3.98, 95% CI: 1.61-9.84, p=0.003). Age, race, BMI, prior taxane and type of AI were not associated with AIMSS on multivariate analysis. No other polymorphisms were associated with AIMSS on secondary analyses. Conclusions: Carriers of OPG rs2073618 may be at increased risk of AIMSS. If confirmed in other cohorts, OPG genotyping may be able to identify individuals with HR+ early BC at increased risk for AIMSS during AI therapy. Alternate ET or interventions to reduce musculoskeletal symptoms may be needed for this population. Citation Format: Daniel L Hertz, Karen Lisa Smith, Yuhua Zong, Christina L Gersch, Andrea Pesch, Arti Patel, Jennifer Lehman, N. Lynn Henry, Kelley M Kidwell, James M Rae, Vered Stearns. Association of OPG rs2073618 and aromatase inhibitor induced musculoskeletal symptoms [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-25.

Background: The combination of anastrozole and fulvestrant (A+F) is associated with improvement in overall survival (OS) as compared to anastrozole (A) in patients (pts) with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC), specifically in pts with endocrine naïve disease or in pts with long disease-free interval (Mehta et al. NEJM 2019). We performed an IRB-approved retrospective assessment of the time-to-treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) outcomes in pts treated at our institution with A+F, and assessed the impact of A+F in various molecularly defined subsets of pts. Methods: We reviewed charts of 118 pts with advanced HR+ BC who received A+F. Pts with brain metastases were not excluded. Performance status (PS) ranged from 0-3. We compared TTF and OS outcomes in pts with and without molecular aberrations including HER2 overexpression/amplification, or mutations in PIK3CA, ESR1 or BRCA1/2. HER2 status was tested through tumor. PIK3CA and ESR1 were tested on tumor or ctDNA by next generation sequencing. Germline/somatic BRCA1/2 status was assessed either through ctDNA or germline testing. Kaplan-Meir survival curves were constructed. Primary statistical analysis was log-rank test, followed by Cox regression to estimate the hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals. All p values are 2-sided. Results: Overall 68 patients had endocrine-sensitive (ES) disease and 50 patients had acquired endocrine-resistant (ER) disease. Median TTF was 26 months in the ES group vs. 10 months in the ER group (HR: 0.47;95% Cl: 0.30 - 0.75, p= 0.001). Median OS was 57 months in the ES group vs. 38 months in the ER group (HR: 0.51; 95% Cl: 0.30 - 0.86, p= 0.01). Among the 31 pts tested for PIK3CA mutation, 21 pts were negative (control) and 10 pts were positive (PIK3CA mutant). Median TTF was 23 months for control vs.14 months for PIK3CA mutant (HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.40 -1.95, p = 0.76). Median OS was not reached for control vs. 44 months for PIK3CA mutant (HR: 0.50; 95% Cl: 0.16 - 1.56, p = 0.23). Among the 35 pts tested for ESR1 mutation, 27 pts were negative (control) and 8 patients were positive (ESR1 mutant). Median TTF was 26 months for control vs. 10 months for ESR1 mutant (HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.23 - 1.52, p = 0.20). Median OS was 66 months for control vs. 65 months for ESR1 mutant (HR: 1.63; 95% Cl: 0.44 - 5.95, p = 0.46). In the 17 pts tested for BRCA mutation (germline or somatic), 6 of them were positive (BRCA mutant) and 11 of them were negative (control). Median TTF was 36 months for control vs. 10 months for BRCA mutant (HR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.12 - 1.40, p = 0.09). Median OS was 35 months for control but has not been reached in the BRCA mutant group (HR: 1.16; 95% Cl: 0.23 - 5.88, p = 0.93). Of 118 patients, 92 pts were HER2 negative (control) and 26 patients were HER2 positive. Median TTF was 23 months for control vs. 14 months for HER2+ group (HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.46 - 1.39, p = 0.42). Median OS was 52 months for control vs. 40 months for HER2+ group (HR: 0.87; 95% Cl: 0.47 - 1.64, p = 0.67). Conclusions: The time-to-treatment failure and overall survival in the endocrine-sensitive disease are 2-fold higher compared to the endocrine-resistant disease. Patients with PIK3CA, ESR1 or BRCA1/2 mutation or with HER2 overexpression/amplification historically have poor survival outcomes, but in hypothesis-generating analysis, we showed statistically similar overall survival outcomes in these patients treated with anastrozole plus fulvestrant, compared to controls without these poor prognostic features. We suggest that anastrozole plus fulvestrant should be the preferred partner with molecularly targeted agents. Citation Format: Tianyi Tang, Yu Cheng, Ritesh Parajuli, Neha Patel, Min-Ying Su, Chaitali Nangia, Rita S Mehta. Overall survival outcomes of combination anastrozole and fulvestrant in molecular subsets of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-32.

Background: Chemopreventive agents such as selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs; tamoxifen and raloxifene) and aromatase inhibitors (AIs; exemestane and anastrozole) have proven efficacy in reducing breast cancer risk by 41%-79% in high risk women. Women at high risk of developing breast cancer face the complex decision of whether to take SERMs or AIs for breast cancer chemoprevention. Underserved racial/ethnic minority women are less likely to take chemoprevention, contributing to higher rates of advanced tumors, and poorer clinical outcomes compared to non-Hispanic whites, which could exacerbate health disparities. RealRisks is a patient-centered web-based decision aid (DA) that was designed to promote understanding of breast cancer risk and to engage diverse women in planning a preference-sensitive course of decision-making about taking chemoprevention. We aimed to understand perceptions of women at high-risk for developing breast cancer regarding their use of RealRisks. Methods: We completed enrollment to a randomized controlled trial (RCT) among 300 racially/ethnically diverse high-risk women assigned to standard educational materials alone or in combination with RealRisks, with the primary endpoint of chemoprevention uptake at 6 months. We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with a subset of 27 high-risk women enrolled in the intervention arm of the RCT to understand how they interact with the DA. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and compared against the digital recordings to ensure accuracy of the content. Content analysis was used as a method to analyze the data and to generate themes. Results: The mean age of the participants was 60.9 years (SD, 10.3). Our sample was racially and ethnically diverse with 59.3% non-Hispanic white, 18.5% non-Hispanic black, 14.8% Hispanic/Latina, and 3.7% Asian. Most participants had a family history of breast cancer (70.4%) and most (78%) reported using RealRisks after being granted access to the DA. Three overarching themes emerged from the qualitative analyses: (1) acceptability of the intervention, (2) usability of the intervention, (3) and information needs. RealRisks was found to be acceptable among the women who used the DA (n=21/27). Most women (n=18/21) felt that RealRisks improved their knowledge about breast cancer risk and chemoprevention options and informed their decision-making about whether or not taking chemoprevention was the right choice for them (n=17/21). Most women reported that RealRisks was easy to navigate, user-friendly, and easily accessible online. Alternatively, a subset of women (n=9/21) shared challenges with using the DA, as they wanted more tailoring based on user characteristics; felt that the DA was specifically targeting multi-ethnic populations that did not reflect them; used difficult terminology; and had a strong emphasis on chemoprevention drugs. Participants offered recommendations for improving the DA and shared their information needs, which mainly focused on wanting to learn about guidelines for mammography screening and lifestyle modification. Conclusions: With this qualitative study, we demonstrated the acceptability of the RealRisks web-based DA among diverse high-risk women with a few caveats and recommendations for improvement. These results emphasize the need for more tailoring of the DA based on user characteristics and a holistic approach to reducing breast cancer risk, to include information on breast cancer screening, as well as lifestyle risk factors. Next steps include incorporating feedback from this study to further enhance the DA and to optimize the modular architecture within RealRisks to include additional modules to meet the needs of diverse high-risk women. Citation Format: Ashlee Guzman, Thomas Silverman, Jennie Mata, Rita Kukafka, Katherine D Crew, Tarsha Jones. Use of a web-based decision aid to promote chemoprevention uptake among racially/ethnically diverse women at high-risk for developing breast cancer: A qualitative study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS8-35.

Objective The objective of the present study was to analyze the reasons that led to hormone therapies (HTs) regimen changes in women with breast cancer. Methods This was a retrospective cross-sectional study from a single-institution Brazilian cancer center with patient records diagnosed with breast cancer between January 2012 and January 2017. Results From 1,555 women who were in treatment with HT, 213 (13.7%) women had HT switched, either tamoxifen to anastrozole or vice-versa. Most women included in the present study who switched HT were > 50 years old, postmenopausal, Caucasian, and had at least one comorbidity. From the group with therapy change, ‘disease progression’ was reason of change in 124 (58.2%) cases, and in 65 (30.5%) patients, ‘presence of side effects’ was the reason. From those women who suffered with side effects, 24 (36.9%) had comorbidities. Conclusion The present study demonstrated a low rate of HT switch of tamoxifen to anastrozole. Among the reasons for changing therapy, the most common was disease progression, which includes cancer recurrence, metastasis or increased tumor. Side effects were second; furthermore, age and comorbidities are risk factors for side effects. Resumo Objetivo O objetivo do presente estudo foi analisar os motivos que levaram às mudanças no esquema hormonioterápico (HT) em mulheres com câncer de mama. Métodos Estudo transversal retrospectivo realizado no Hospital da Mulher de Campinas e consequente pesquisa de prontuários de mulheres diagnosticados com câncer de mama entre janeiro de 2012 e janeiro de 2017. Resultados De 1.555 mulheres em tratamento com HT, 213 (13,7%) mulheres tiveram HT alterado, tamoxifeno para anastrozol ou vice-versa. A maioria das mulheres incluídas no presente estudo que tiveram mudança de HT tinha > 50 anos, estava na pós-menopausa, era caucasiana e tinha pelo menos uma comorbidade. Os principais motivos de troca de HT foram devido a ’progressão da doença’, ocorrendo em 124 (58,2%) casos e a ’presença de efeitos colaterais’ (n = 65; 30,5%). Das mulheres que sofreram efeitos colaterais, 24 (36,9%) apresentaram comorbidades. Conclusão O presente estudo demonstrou uma baixa taxa na alteração de tamoxifeno para anastrozol. Entre as razõesmais comuns para alterar a HT estava a progressão da doença, que inclui recorrência do câncer, metástase ou aumento do tumor. Os efeitos colaterais foram a segunda causa e, além disso, a idade e as comorbidades foram fatores de risco para efeitos colaterais.

The relationship between obesity and prognosis of early breast cancer is complex. Increased levels of aromatase present in adipose tissue of obese postmenopausal women may lead to suboptimal suppression of systemic estrogens. However, studies have been mixed with respect to the association between use of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and clinical outcomes in obese women with early breast cancer. We conducted a systematic literature review following PRISMA guidelines to examine the impact of obesity on the efficacy of AIs in early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Primary outcome measures included disease-free survival, relapse-free survival, distant recurrence-free survival, breast cancer-free survival, and overall survival. Of 491 studies identified, eight studies met criteria for inclusion: three retrospective cohort studies, one prospective cohort study and four randomized controlled trials. Four studies limited eligibility to postmenopausal women. Percentage of obese patients in studies ranged from 10 to 30%. Two studies examined use of AIs alone while the remainder included patients treated with either AIs or tamoxifen. Five out of seven studies suggested a negative impact of obesity on AI efficacy. The results of our systematic review highlight a need for further research exploring the optimal endocrine therapies for obese women. There is insufficient evidence at present to recommend tailoring adjuvant endocrine therapy with use of specific AIs or for dosing modifications of AIs in this patient population.

The objectives of this study are to assess the role of non-chemotherapeutic combination of drugs as maintenance therapy, after standard treatment, for advanced epithelial ovarian cancers (EOC) and to determine the recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). One hundred women with advanced high-grade EOC who had completed standard treatment by primary/interval debulking surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy were randomised to either receive (study group) or not to receive (control group) the non-chemotherapeutic maintenance therapy (oral metformin, anastrozole, aspirin, atorvastatin, vitamin D, injection zoledronic acid). Both groups were followed up, and trends of RFS and CSS were analysed. One hundred patients were analysed. Median RFS was 18 months (95% CI: 13–24) in study group versus 16 (95% CI: 14–20) in the control group (P value = 0.57). Median CSS in the study group was lesser than that in the control group (47 months (95% CI: 31–68) versus 51 (95% CI: 32–66), P value = 0.76). Five-year CSS was not significantly different between the groups (47% study vs 40% control, P value = 0.51). The use of combination of non-chemotherapeutic drugs as maintenance therapy was found to have no significant impact on the survival or reduction of recurrences in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13193-020-01261-w.

Purpose Abemaciclib in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) has demonstrated significant efficacy benefits in HR+ , HER2− advanced breast cancer patients in the Phase 3 studies MONARCH 2 (fulvestrant as ET) and MONARCH 3 (letrozole or anastrozole as ET). Here, we report age-specific safety and efficacy outcomes. Methods Exploratory analyses of MONARCH 2 and 3 were performed for 3 age groups ( Results Pooled safety data were available for 1152 patients. Clinically relevant diarrhea (Grade 2/3) was higher in older patients receiving abemaciclib + ET (p-value, 0.695; MONARCH 3: interaction p-value, 0.634). Estimated hazard ratios ranged from 0.523–0.633 (MONARCH 2) and 0.480–0.635 (MONARCH 3). Conclusions While higher rates of adverse events were reported in older patients, they were manageable with dose adjustments and concomitant medication. Importantly, a consistent efficacy benefit was observed across all age groups. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02107703 (first posted April 8, 2014) and NCT02246621 (first posted September 23, 2014).

Background Anastrozole has been associated with substantial accelerated bone mineral density (BMD) loss during active treatment. Methods One thousand four hundred and ten women were included in a BMD substudy and stratified into three strata according to their baseline T-score at spine or femoral neck. The primary objective of this analysis was to investigate whether DXA BMD at the spine and hip changed two years after treatment cessation (between years 5 and 7) in those who did not receive risedronate. Results Five- and seven-year BMD data were available for a total of 528 women who did not receive risedronate. In women with normal BMD at baseline, an increase in BMD at the lumbar spine after anastrozole withdrawal was observed 1.25% (95% CI 0.73 to 1.77) (P = 0.0004), which was larger than in those on placebo (0.14% (−0.29 to 0.56))). At the hip, BMD remained unchanged between years 5 and 7 for those previously on anastrozole but continued to a decrease in those who had been randomised to placebo (−1.35% (−1.70 to −0.98)). Conclusions These are the first results reporting BMD changes after stopping anastrozole in a breast cancer prevention setting. Our results show that the negative effects of anastrozole on BMD in the preventive setting are partially reversible.

Context Spermatogenesis is strictly regulated by the intratesticular hormonal milieu, in which testosterone (T) and estradiol (E2) play pivotal roles. However, the optimal expression of aromatase and intratesticular T (ITT) and E2 (ITE2) levels are unknown. Objective To investigate ITT/ITE2 and aromatase expression in men with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) and to elucidate the roles of aromatase in spermatogenesis, as determined based on sperm retrieval by microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE). Design and Setting A retrospective study at a reproductive center using serum, testicular specimens, and intratesticular fluid. Patients Seventy-six men with NOA, including 4 men who received 3 months of anastrozole administration prior to micro-TESE, and 18 men with obstructive azoospermia. Interventions Testicular aromatase expression was evaluated using immunohistochemistry and quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Intratesticular T and ITE2 levels were determined using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Results Aromatase was mainly located in Leydig cells, and the levels of its transcript and protein expression levels were increased in men with NOA. No correlation was observed between serum T/E2 and ITT/ITE2 levels, whereas significant associations were observed between decreased ITT and increased ITE2, aromatase expression, and sperm retrieval. Treatment with anastrozole increased the ITT/ITE2 ratio and decreased aromatase expression. Conclusions A close association between the expression of aromatase in Leydig cells and ITT/ITE2 was shown. Leydig cell aromatase is a factor that is independently correlated with spermatogenesis, and aromatase inhibitors may open a therapeutic window by increasing ITT/ITE2 in selected patients.

Background: Estrogens are essential for the growth of breast cancer in the case of premenopausal as well as in postmenopausal women. However, most of the breast cancer incidences are reported in postmenopausal women and the concurrent risk surges with an increase in age. Since the enzyme aromatase catalyses essential steps in estrogen biosynthesis, Aromatase Inhibitors (AIs) are effective targeted therapy in patients with Estrogen Receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer. AIs are more effective than Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators (SERMs) because they block both the genomic and nongenomic activities of ER. Till date, first, second and third-generation AIs have been approved by the FDA. The third-generation AIs, viz. Letrozole, Anastrozole, Exemestane, are currently used in the standard treatment for postmenopausal breast cancer. Methods: Data were collected from Medline, PubMed, Google Scholar, Science Direct through searching of keywords: ‘aromatase’, ‘aromatase inhibitors’, ‘breast cancer’, ‘steroidal aromatase inhibitors’, ‘non-steroidal inhibitors’ and ‘generations of aromatase inhibitors’. Results: In the current scenario of breast cancer chemotherapy, AIs are the most widely used agents which reveal optimum efficacy along with the least side effects. Keeping in view the prominence of AIs in breast cancer therapy, this review covered the detailed description of aromatase including its role in the biosynthesis of estrogen, biochemistry, gene expression, 3D-structure, and information of reported AIs along with their role in breast cancer treatment. Conclusion: AIs are the mainstream solution of the ER+ breast cancer treatment regimen with the continuous improvement of human understanding of the importance of a healthy life of women suffering from breast cancer.

BackgroundTreatment of children with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) or idiopathic short stature (ISS) using GH is only effective for bone growth prior to epiphyseal fusion. Aromatase inhibitor therapy (AIT) blocks estrogen production, thereby delaying epiphyseal fusion. The current study analyzed baseline characteristics and longitudinal data of male patients with GHD or ISS who were treated with GH and concomitant AIT.MethodsData were obtained from the observational American Norditropin® Studies: Web-Enabled Research (ANSWER) Program, which collected efficacy and safety data of patients treated with Norditropin®. A longitudinal cohort approach compared patient characteristics, including chronologic age, bone age, and height standard deviation score (HSDS), in GH-treated males before and after AIT initiation.ResultsA total of 142 GH-naïve patients with GHD (n = 115) or ISS (n = 27) with mean (± SD) baseline chronological ages of 12.10 ± 3.00 and 10.76 ± 3.07 years, respectively, were analyzed. The majority were classified at advanced Tanner stages II to V. Patients with GHD had mean HSDS of − 1.97 ± 0.78 at baseline and − 0.99 ± 0.88 prior to AIT initiation, while corresponding values for patients with ISS were − 2.15 ± 0.72 and − 1.04 ± 0.79, respectively. In patients evaluated after 2 years of concomitant AIT, mean HSDS had decreased to − 0.40 ± 1.16 and − 0.65 ± 0.52 for patients with GHD and ISS, respectively. Patients with GHD had a mean bone age/chronological age ratio (BA/CA) of 0.91 ± 0.11 at baseline and 0.97 ± 0.10 prior to AIT initiation, while corresponding values for patients with ISS were 0.85 ± 0.16 and 0.99 ± 0.10, respectively. In patients evaluated after 2 years of concomitant AIT, mean BA/CA values were 0.95 ± 0.10 and 0.96 ± 0.06 for patients with GHD and ISS, respectively.ConclusionsIn this real-world analysis, use of AIT with GH in males appeared to be associated with ongoing growth over 2 years, and AIT likely augmented growth potential as indicated by continued HSDS increase with decreased BA/CA after AIT initiation.Trial registrationThis trial was sponsored by Novo Nordisk and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01009905). Registered November 11, 2009; retrospectively registered

PurposeExemestane, a steroidal aromatase inhibitor, is an important therapeutic option in the treatment of post-menopausal hormone receptor positive breast cancer. Adverse effects include hot flashes and bone loss, but rarely is hepatotoxicity reported. We report a case of exemestane induced cholestatic liver injury following exemestane initiation.Case reportA now 77-year-old Caucasian female with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), and metastatic hormone receptor positive breast cancer originally diagnosed in 2000 who developed symptoms of pruritus, diarrhea, grade 2 transaminitis, and grade 1 hyperbilirubinemia three weeks after exemestane initiation. Management and outcome: Due to the patient’s signs and symptoms, exemestane was discontinued and the patient was continued on cholestyramine until resolution of her laboratory abnormalities. Approximately a week after discontinuation, the patient was started and maintained on anastrozole without recurrence of her symptoms.DiscussionHepatotoxicity with aromatase inhibitors have rarely been reported in clinical trials and to date, instances of exemestane induced hepatotoxicity has only been reported in two case reports. The patient’s history of primary biliary cirrhosis may be an important risk factor for the development of hepatotoxicity from exemestane.

Objectives Based on our previous findings that postmenopausal women with estrone (E1) and estradiol (E2) concentrations at or above 1.3 pg/ml and 0.5 pg/ml, respectively, after 6 months of adjuvant anastrozole therapy had a three-fold risk of recurrence, we aimed to identify a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based model that would predict elevated E1 and E2 and then validate it in an independent dataset. Patients and methods The test set consisted of 322 women from the M3 study and the validation set consisted of 152 patients from MA.27. All patients were treated with adjuvant anastrozole, had on-anastrozole E1 and E2 concentrations and genome-wide genotyping. Results SNPs were identified from the M3 genome-wide association study. The best model to predict the E1-E2 phenotype with high balanced accuracy was a support vector machine model using clinical factors plus 46 SNPs. We did not have an independent cohort that is similar to the M3 study with clinical, E1-E2 phenotypes and genotype data to test our model. Hence, we chose a nested matched case-control cohort (MA.27 study) for testing. Our E1-E2 model was not validated but we found the MA.27 validation cohort was both clinically and genomically different. Conclusions We identified a SNP-based model that had excellent performance characteristics for predicting the phenotype of elevated E1 and E2 in women treated with anastrozole. This model was not validated in an independent dataset but that dataset was clinically and genomically substantially different. The model will need validation in a prospective study.

Female patients with breast cancer frequently develop arthralgia when treated with aromatase inhibitors (AI). Although the mechanism of AI-induced arthralgia is unknown, potential biomarkers have been identified. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical and genetic predictors of AI-induced arthralgia in a prospective cohort of patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. One hundred and ninety-six patients were enrolled at initiation of AI therapy with either letrozole or anastrozole. Patients completed two validated self-report questionnaires assessing pain, stiffness, and physical function at baseline, and repeated the questionnaires at two and at six months after the initiation of treatment with an AI. Germline DNA of all patients was genotyped for seven single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) previously identified by genetic screens and genome-wide association studies as associated with AI-induced arthralgia. More than 50% of the study group experienced arthralgia symptoms. Genetic analysis revealed that four SNPs, in CYP19A1 (rs4775936) and ESR1 (rs9322336, rs2234693, rs9340799), were associated with the development of arthralgia (adjusted P = 0.016, 0.018, 0.017, 0.047). High body mass index (BMI) was also associated with the development of arthralgia symptoms (adjusted P = 0.001). Patients prescribed letrozole were significantly more likely to develop arthralgia than patients on anastrozole (P = 0.018), and also more likely to discontinue AI therapy due to arthralgia. The CYP19A1 (rs4775936) SNP was significantly associated with discontinuation of therapy due to intolerable arthralgia. Our results suggested that BMI and AI drug (letrozole versus anastrozole) were clinical predictors of arthralgia, while genetic variants rs4775936, rs9322336, rs2234693, and rs9340799 were genetic predictors of AI-induced arthralgia. Significantly, rs4775936 was also a predictor of discontinuation of therapy.

The review presents the results of studies of fulvestrant in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) Hormone therapy is an effective method of treating hormone-positive metastatic breast cancer even in the presence of visceral metastases in the absence of a visceral crisis and without detected resistance to endocrine therapy During the COVID-19 pandemic, hormone therapy is safer for patients with hormone-positive MBC than chemotherapy, since it does not lead to immunosup-pression Fulvestrant is a “pure antiestrogen”, it has a greater affinity for estrogen receptors than tamoxifen Fulvestrant is both a competitive antagonist and a selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), this mechanism of action provides complete blocking of the estrogen signaling pathway In the phase III CONFIRM study, the optimal dose of fulvestrate was determined to be 500 mg once every 28 days, with a loading dose of 500 mg on day 15 of the first month of thera-py In the FALCON phase III study (n = 462), which included postmenopausal MBC patients who had not previously received any endocrine therapy, fulvestrant 500 mg was compared with the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole Significant improvement in PFS was achieved with fulvestrant therapy compared to anastrozole: 16 6 months in the fulvestrant group versus 13 8 months with anastrozole [OR = 0 797;95% CI 0 637–0 999;p = 0 0486] A subgroup analysis showed that patients without visceral metastases can benefit most from taking fulvestrant In all studies fulvestrant 500 mg has demonstrated a good toxicity profile, so it is being studied as a component of combined endocrine therapy In the PALOMA-3 study the combination of fulvestrant with palbociclib (CDK4/6 inhibitor) demonstrated a median PFS 9 5 months, compared with monotherapy with fulvestrant – 4 6 months (HR = 0 46, p < 0 0001) In the MONALEESA-3 study, the median PFS in patients receiving ribociclib with fulvestrant was significantly higher compared to those taking placebo with fulvestrant: 20 5 months and 12 8 months, respectively (HR = 0 593;95% CI: 0 480–0 732;p < 0 001) In the MONARCH-2 study the combination of fulvestrant and abemaciclib was studied in the second line of therapy, the median PFS was 16 4 months in the group of fulvestrant and abemaciclib, and 9 3 months in the group of fulvestrant and placebo (HR = 0 553;95% CI 0 449-0 681;p < 0 0001) Fulvestrant has a satisfactory toxicity profile, does not require supporting therapy, and is included in the clinical recommendations for monotherapy and combination therapy © 2020, Remedium Group Ltd All rights reserved

Background There is limited literature on patterns of everolimus use and subsequent hospitalizations and emergency room (ER) visits in real-world clinical practice. In this study, we describe patterns of everolimus use and hospitalizations and ER visits in a large cohort of patients with breast cancer (BC). Materials and Methods Patients with BC treated with everolimus were identified in the MarketScan database from 2009 to 2016. The pattern of everolimus use and frequency of associated ER visits and hospitalizations during treatment (between the first claim and 30 days after the last claim for everolimus) were identified. Descriptive statistics and regression models were used. Results A total of 3,556 everolimus users were identified (median age of 60 years; median days of use, 112). The initial prescribed dose was 10 mg in 74.8% of the patients. Compared with the initial dose, 23.5% of patients had a dose change. Forty-six percent of patients were hospitalized or had an ER visit during the treatment with everolimus. Age greater than 71, higher comorbidity score, treatment year prior to 2012, and lower initial dose were found to be significantly associated with ER visit/hospitalization in the regression models. Conclusions A significant proportion of patients receiving everolimus had an ER visit or hospitalization during the use of everolimus. These results provide data regarding risks and benefits of treatment with everolimus. These results will be helpful in identifying patients at higher risk of hospitalizations or ER visits and facilitate evidence-based decision making to avoid serious complications. Implications for Practice Everolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, is approved in combination with exemestane in patients with hormone receptor–positive tumors previously treated with anastrozole or letrozole. As new drugs become available, it is crucial to understand the adverse events and potential complications associated with the use of such drugs in the general population, outside of the controlled clinical trial setting. This study describes the patterns of everolimus use and adverse events, including hospitalization and emergency room visits, in a large cohort of patients with metastatic breast cancer in routine practice.

Purpose:To determine if the degree of estrogen suppression with aromatase inhibitors (AI: anastrozole, exemestane, letrozole) is associated with efficacy in early-stage breast cancer, and to examine for differences in the mechanism of action between the three AIs.Experimental Design:Matched case–control studies [247 matched sets from MA.27 (anastrozole vs. exemestane) and PreFace (letrozole) trials] were undertaken to assess whether estrone (E1) or estradiol (E2) concentrations after 6 months of adjuvant therapy were associated with risk of an early breast cancer event (EBCE). Preclinical laboratory studies included luciferase activity, cell proliferation, radio-labeled ligand estrogen receptor binding, surface plasmon resonance ligand receptor binding, and nuclear magnetic resonance assays.Results:Women with E1 ≥1.3 pg/mL and E2 ≥0.5 pg/mL after 6 months of AI treatment had a 2.2-fold increase in risk (P = 0.0005) of an EBCE, and in the anastrozole subgroup, the increase in risk of an EBCE was 3.0-fold (P = 0.001). Preclinical laboratory studies examined mechanisms of action in addition to aromatase inhibition and showed that only anastrozole could directly bind to estrogen receptor α (ERα), activate estrogen response element-dependent transcription, and stimulate growth of an aromatase-deficient CYP19A1−/− T47D breast cancer cell line.Conclusions:This matched case–control clinical study revealed that levels of estrone and estradiol above identified thresholds after 6 months of adjuvant anastrozole treatment were associated with increased risk of an EBCE. Preclinical laboratory studies revealed that anastrozole, but not exemestane or letrozole, is a ligand for ERα. These findings represent potential steps towards individualized anastrozole therapy.

To assess the variability in management of estrogen levels in men treated with testosterone therapy (TTh). With the significant increase in the last 2 decades in the treatment of hypogonadism and the use of TTh, detailed guidelines for the management of estrogen levels are necessary.The response rate was 22.5% (489/2168). A total 62.4% of respondents indicated that they check serum estrogen at initial evaluation, but only 54.7% monitor levels in patients on TTh (P = .02). Fellowship-trained and North American respondents were more likely to monitor patients (P.05). A total of 69.4%, 47.7%, and 14.4% respondents prescribe antiestrogenic medications in symptomatic patients with elevated estrogen levels, for asymptomatic-elevated estrogen levels, and prophylactically, respectively. Academic respondents were more likely to prescribe an antiestrogen medication to symptomatic patients and prophylactically (P.05). Anastrozole was the most common medication prescribed for symptomatic hyperestrogenemia (62.3%), but starting doses varied significantly, from 1 mg weekly to 1 mg daily.Approximately 50% of practitioners treating men with TTh monitor estrogen levels. Symptoms play a role in prescribing patterns and significant variability in aromatase inhibitors regimens exists. Increased monitoring of estrogen levels in men on TTh will facilitate an understanding of the symptoms, effects of high and low estrogen levels, and aid in standardization of research and therapy.

Purpose Aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, letrozole) and selective estrogen receptor modulators (tamoxifen) are widely used as adjuvant hormonal therapy in women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. We aimed to evaluate the effects of oral adjuvant hormonotherapy on tear functions in patients with breast cancer. Methods In this case-control study, we enrolled eligible patients with breast cancer who were receiving regular medical selective estrogen receptor modulator (tamoxifen, n:50), aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, letrozole, n:50) and gender-matched healthy controls (n:50). Tear functions were measured and compared by the Schirmer test, fluorescein breakup time, corneal staining evaluated by Oxford grading scale and Ocular Surface Disease Index scores. Results Mean age was 49.95 (+/- 9.2), 51.52 (+/- 7.2) and 51.91 (+/- 10.3) in tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors groups and controls (p = 0.426). Mean duration of BC diagnosis (p = 0.536) and drug use (p = 0.417) was not significant between two groups. Ocular Surface Disease Index scores were lower (p < 0.001), and fluorescein breakup time measurements were higher (p < 0.001) in controls. Schirmer test scores were higher in controls than aromatase inhibitors group (p < 0.001). According to the scores of all measurements, the differences between aromatase inhibitors and tamoxifen groups were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Conclusions Our results demonstrated a high difference in all parameters in patients receiving aromatase inhibitors compared to tamoxifen group and controls. Aromatase inhibitors, which reduce estrogen levels in the blood, might affect the tear functions more than tamoxifen, which affects as antiestrogenic on estrogen receptors.

BACKGROUND Patients with hormone receptor-positive breast tumors receive hormonal therapy with either selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) (eg, tamoxifen) or aromatase inhibitors (AIs) (eg, anastrozole) for 5 to 10 years. Patients are using these therapies frequently during breast reconstruction. Literature investigating the effects of hormonal modulators on breast reconstruction outcomes demonstrates conflicting results. We sought to perform a systematic evaluation to assess the effects of hormonal therapy on breast reconstruction outcomes and to guide perioperative management of antiestrogen therapies. METHODS A MEDLINE, PubMed, and EBSCO Host search of articles regarding the effects of SERMs and AIs on breast reconstruction was performed. Outcomes evaluated included wound complications, total or partial flap loss, and thromboembolic events. Included studies were assigned Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies quality scores. RESULTS A total of 2581 flaps were analyzed for complete loss: patients taking SERMs at the time of reconstruction had higher rates of flap loss compared with patients not taking hormone modulators (P < 0.001). Flap loss was not affected by concurrent AI use (P = 0.11). Both SERMs and AIs had an increased risk of donor site complications (P = 0.0021 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Neither hormone modulator had an effect on flap wound complications or venous thromboembolic event rates. CONCLUSIONS Evidence indicates patients using SERMs at the time of operation are at an increased risk of flap loss and those taking either SERMs or AIs have higher rates of donor site complications. These findings support holding these medications for 1 to 2 half lives (tamoxifen, 14-28 days; AIs, 2-4 days) preoperatively.

Objective To quantify the effects of the Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion on prescriptions for effective breast cancer hormonal therapies (tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors) among Medicaid enrollees. Data source/study setting Medicaid State Drug Utilization Database (SDUD) 2011-2018, comprising the universe of outpatient prescription medications covered under the Medicaid program. Study design Differences-in-differences and event-study linear models compare population rates of tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitor (anastrozole, exemestane, and letrozole) use in expansion and nonexpansion states, controlling for population characteristics, state, and time. Principal findings Relative to nonexpansion states, Medicaid-financed hormonal therapy prescriptions increased by 27.2 per 100 000 nonelderly women in a state. This implies a 28.8 percent increase from the pre-expansion mean of 94.2 per 100 000 nonelderly women in expansion states. The event-study model reveals no evidence of differential pretrends in expansion and nonexpansion states and suggests use grew to 40 or more prescriptions per 100 000 nonelderly women 3-5 years postexpansion. Conclusions Medicaid expansion may have had a meaningful impact on the ability of lower-income women to access effective hormonal therapies used to treat breast cancer.

Background Five-year adjuvant treatment with aromatase inhibitors is a standard treatment for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. However, aromatase inhibitor-related adverse events, including joint and vasomotor symptoms, have a strong impact on patient quality of life and sometimes cause the discontinuation of treatment. The aim of this prospective cohort study based on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) was to examine the influence of adverse events on prognosis in Japanese postmenopausal patients with breast cancer treated with adjuvant anastrozole. Patients and Methods A total of 391 postmenopausal Japanese women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer who were treated with adjuvant anastrozole were enrolled from 28 centers in this prospective cohort study (SAVS-JP, UMIN000002455). PRO assessments of adverse events, which included joint and vasomotor symptoms, were obtained at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Symptoms were assessed and assigned to one of four categories: none (G0), mild (G1), moderate (G2), and severe (G3). The questionnaires covered joint symptoms (arthralgia, decrease in range of joint motion, and joint stiffness), vasomotor symptoms (hot flashes, night sweats, and cold sweats), and adherence to anastrozole. The median follow-up was 82 months, and we analyzed the prognosis in patients, focusing on the occurrence of joint and vasomotor symptoms induced by treatment. Results Of the 391 patients, 204 (52.2%) completed 5-year treatment, 75 (19.2%) discontinued (adverse events (n=35), recurrence (n=19), secondary malignancies (n=4), death from non-breast cancer (n=4), and other reasons (n=13)), 48 (12.3%) are receiving treatment, and 64 (16.4%) were unknown. Patients who experienced G2+3 joint symptoms had significantly better disease-free survival (DFS) compared with patients with G0+1 joint symptoms (5-year DFS, 96.1% vs. 83.3%, p=0.002). Similarly, the DFS in patients with G2+3 vasomotor symptoms was significantly better than that in those with G0+1 vasomotor symptoms (5-year DFS, 93.5% vs. 86.3%, p=0.049). Joint symptoms were marginally associated with overall survival (OS) (p=0.062), but no significant association was found with vasomotor symptoms. The DFS was superior in patients with G2+3 joint and vasomotor symptoms (5-year DFS, 100%), inferior in those with G0+1 joint and vasomotor symptoms (5-year DFS, 82.6%), and intermediate in others (5-year DFS, 93.3%; p=0.0024). By multivariable analysis including tumor size and grade, G2+3 joint symptoms were a significant and independent predictive factor for DFS (hazard ratio, 0.298, 95% confidence interval 0.122-0.621, p=0.0007). Conclusion Although adverse events might make patients uncomfortable and reduce their quality of life, it is suggested that worse or new vasomotor symptoms and severe joint symptoms, especially if they are grade 2 or 3, seem to associate with better prognosis. Citation Format: Chiyomi Egawa, Shintaro Takao, Kazuhiro Yamagami, Masaru Miyashita, Masashi Baba, Shigetoshi Ichii, Muneharu Konishi, Yuichiro Kikawa, Junya Minohata, Toshitaka Okuno, Keisuke Miyauchi, Kazuyuki Wakita, Hirofumi Suwa, Takashi Hashimoto, Masayuki Nishino, Takashi Matsumoto, Toshiharu Hidaka, Yutaka Konishi, Yoko Sakoda, Akihiro Miya, Masahiro Kishimoto, Hidefumi Nishikawa, Seishi Kono, Ikuo Kokufu, Isao Sakita, Koushiro Kitatsuji, Koushi Oh, Yasuo Miyoshi. Influence of aromatase inhibitor-related adverse events on the prognosis in postmenopausal Japanese patients with breast cancer: A prospective multicenter cohort study on patient-reported outcomes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-12-07.

Introduction: According to phase II clinical trial of endocrine treatment for hormone receptor positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer(MBC) after tamoxifen treatment in premenopausal women, fulvestrant plus goserelin (F+G) has better clinical outcome than goserelin (G) alone in premenopausal women, in terms of time to progression (TTP). However, aromatase inhibitor (AI) with goserelin (A+G) is not superior to goserelin alone. Among three treatment arms, difference of overall survival (OS) was not observed. Accompanied with this clinical trial, we conducted further genotyping to identify alleles at some genomic loci associated with clinical outcome of endocrine treatments in premenopausal women with HR+ MBC. Methods: This prospective genotyping study included patients enrolled in a randomized phase II clinical trial of fulvestrant plus goserelin versus anastrozole plus goserelin versus goserelin alone for HR+, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HER2)-negative tamoxifen-pretreated premenopausal women with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (KCSG BR10-04). To isolate genomic DNA from peripheral blood leukocytes, we used the Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Promega, WI) and Axiom Precision Medicine Research Array (PMRA) (ThermoFisher, CA) was used to genotyping array. Survival analyses for time-to-progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. To determine the association between clinical outcomes and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), we used an R package for genome-wide survival analysis (gwasurvivr). Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for univariate and multivariate analyses. Finally, SNPs with adjusted p-value Results: Of 138 participants, genomic DNA was collected and extracted from 127 participants. After quality control (QC), 103 genomic DNA were finally selected for genotyping (35 in F+G, 36 in A+G and 32 in G group). Patients with age under 40 were 34 (33%) and visceral metastases were observed in 50 patients (49%). Medial TTP was 16.3 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 13.3, 19.3) and median OS was 59.6 months (95% CI: 41.1, 78.1). Among 523,289 SNPs, 76 SNPs were associated with TTP (adjusted p-value Conclusions: Genetic polymorphisms influenced the clinical outcome of HR+ MBC patients treated with anti-hormonal therapy. Further studies on the functional mechanisms relating to these SNPs in these genes are warranted. Citation Format: Ji-Yeon Kim, Seock-Ah Im, Kyung Hae Jung, Keun Seok Lee, Joohyuk Sohn, Jee Hyun Kim, Hae Hyun Jung, Minjoo Lee, Young-Hyuck Im. Genome-wide association study predict prognosis of hormone receptor positive metastatic breast cancer in premenopausal women with endocrine therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-08-50.

Background: The St.Gallen consensus guideline recommends the sequential administration chemotherapy followed by endocrine therapy as postoperative therapy for the higher risk of ER-positive breast cancer patients based on results of a single study. In metastatic settings, however, several trials conducted in the 1980s' demonstrated that tumor response rates were higher when chemotherapy and tamoxifen was concomitantly administered than when chemotherapy and tamoxifen administered were given sequentially. In the preoperative settings, pathological complete response (pCR) rate can be used as a surrogate marker to predict event-free survival or overall survival in Luminal B-like (HER2-negative) breast cancer. We, therefore, designed a prospective randomized safety and efficacy trial in order to test a hypothesis that the concomitant administration of an aromatase inhibitor and chemotherapy improves pathological complete response (pCR) rate than chemotherapy alone in the preoperative setting. Trial design: This two-arm randomized clinical trial enrolled operable breast cancer patients with Luminal B-like (HER2-negative) subtype. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive preoperative chemotherapy alone or preoperative chemotherapy concurrent with endocrine therapy for 24 weeks before surgery. Chemotherapy consisted of 12 cycles of weekly paclitaxel followed by 4 cycles of every 3-week AC. Endocrine therapy consisted of anastrozole for postmenopausal patients or anastrozole plus leuprorelin for premenopausal patients. Eligibility criteria: 1)Female patients with operable and histologically confirmed invasive breast cancer; 2)HER2-negative; 3)Either ER-positive or PgR-positive; 4)Either Ki67-LI>=14% and NG>=2 or NG=3 regardless of Ki67-LI. Endpoints: Primary endpoint is the pCR rate. Secondary endpoints are the clinical response rate (RECIST), the breast-conserving surgery rate, the adverse events, and HRQOL. Results: Between March 2012 and August 2017, 70 patients were randomly assigned to chemotherapy group (n=34) or chemo-endocrine therapy group (n=36). pCR rates were 8.8 % and 2.7 % in the chemotherapy and the chemo-endocrine group, respectively (P = 0.319). Similarly, clinical complete response rates were 5.9 % and 5.6 % in the chemotherapy and the chemo-endocrine group, respectively (P = 0.745). There were no clear differences in treatment-related side effects and HRQOL between interventions. Conclusion: The concomitant administration of endocrine therapy and chemotherapy in Luminal B-like breast cancer patients is similar to chemotherapy alone in pCR rate and clinical response in the preoperative setting. Citation Format: Roichi Matsunuma, Toru Watanabe, Yasuo Hozumi, Kei Koizumi, Yasushi Ito, Hirofumi Fujita, Hiroyuki Ogura, Keigo Goto, Hiroki Mori, Noriko Sawai, Norihiko Shiiya. An efficacy and safety trial of preoperative chemo-endocrine therapy in Luminal B-like (HER2-negative) breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-13-03.

Background: Abemaciclib plus nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors (AI) demonstrated efficacy with a tolerable safety profile as initial treatment for postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2− advanced breast cancer in the MONARCH 3 trial. In the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, the updated progression-free survival (PFS) with 12 months of additional follow-up was 28.2 versus 14.8 months (HR [95% CI]: 0.525 [0.415, 0.665]; p Methods: In MONARCH 3, a randomized, double-blind, phase III trial, 493 postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2− advanced breast cancer and no prior systemic therapy in the advanced setting, received an AI (anastrozole or letrozole) plus abemaciclib or placebo. From the October 31, 2018 cutoff, secondary endpoints including objective response rate ([ORR], complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]), time to response (TTR), and duration of response ([DoR], time from a confirmed CR or PR until disease progression or death) were assessed in the ITT population and exploratory subgroups previously reported as significantly prognostic. Waterfall plots will be used to illustrate the magnitude of change in tumor size for each subgroup (to be presented). Results: In patients with measurable disease, the ORR was 62.5% (95% CI: 56.7, 68.2) in the abemaciclib plus AI arm and 44.7% (95% CI: 36.2, 53.2) in the placebo plus AI arm (p≤.001). Additional follow-up confirmed that all prognostic subgroups received benefit from the addition of abemaciclib to AI, consistent with the ITT population, as evidenced by change in ORR, with the largest effects observed in subgroups of patients with liver metastases, progesterone receptor-negative tumors, high grade tumors, or treatment-free interval of Conclusions: Extended follow-up in the MONARCH 3 trial further confirmed that the addition of abemaciclib to AI is associated with durable tumor responses, including those in patients with clinically poor prognostic characteristics. References: Di Leo A et al. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2018;4:41. Clinical trial information: NCT02246621 This study was funded by Eli Lilly and Company Table: Objective Response RateAbemaciclib + AIPlacebo + AIORR ChangeNn (%)Nn (%)%Measurable disease population269168 (62.5)13259 (44.7)17.8Liver metastasesYes4727 (57.45)306 (20.00)37.45No222141 (63.51)10253 (51.96)11.55Progesterone receptor statusNegative6137 (60.66)298 (27.59)33.07Positive206130 (63.11)10351 (49.51)13.60Treatment-free interval Citation Format: Joyce O’Shaughnessy, Stephen Johnston, Miguel Martin, Jens Huober, Masakazu Toi, Valerie AnneMarie Andre, Holly Rene Martin, Molly Catherine Hardebeck, Angelo Di Leo, Matthew Philip Goetz. Updated subgroup tumor response of abemaciclib plus aromatase inhibitor for hormone receptor positive (HR+), HER2 negative advanced breast cancer (MONARCH 3) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-19-09.