Search

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection is a worldwide health problem with significant morbidity. Children with CHB require a lifetime of monitoring for infection activation, hepatic disease and its complications, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Children with CHB which is in the immune active stage are candidates for antiviral treatment. As new medications have been approved for children, the treatment recommendations have changed. This review summarizes the recent data. With the demonstration of safety and efficacy of entecavir and tenofovir in children, previously used medications like lamivudine and adefovir are no longer recommended as the first-line treatments. Health care providers should provide counseling regarding monitoring, natural history, and transmission to children with CHB and their families. Children in the immune active stage are candidates for antiviral treatment. With more approved therapies over the last few years for a wider age range of children, there are safe, effective, and well-tolerated therapeutic options.

John Charles Martin should be remembered as a visionary medicinal chemist who was involved in the coinvention, development, or management of many FDA-approved antiviral drugs such as ganciclovir, stavudine, didanosine, cidofovir, oseltamivir, adefovir dipivoxil, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, tenofovir alafenamide, sofosbuvir, and remdesivir.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Most children acquire the infection perinatally or during early childhood and develop a chronic hepatitis characterized by a high viral replication and a low-inflammation phase of infection, with normal or only slightly raised aminotransferases. Although a conservative approach in children is usually recommended, different therapies exist and different therapeutic approaches are possible. The main goals of antiviral treatment for children with chronic HBV infection are to suppress viral replication and to warn the disease progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, although these complications are rare in children. Both United States Food and Drug Administration (US-FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) have approved interferon alfa-2b for children aged 1 year and older, pegylated interferon alfa-2a and lamivudine for children aged 3 years and older, entecavir for use in children aged 2 years and older, and adefovir for use in those 12 years of age and older. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate is approved by EMA for children aged 2 years and older and by US-FDA for treatment in children aged 12 years and older. Finally, EMA has approved the use of tenofovir alafenamide for treatment of children aged 12 years and older or for children weighing more than 35 kg independent of age. This narrative review will provide the framework for summarizing indications to antiviral therapy in the management of chronic HBV infection in children and adolescents.

Background Pradefovir is a liver-targeted prodrug of adefovir, a nucleoside/nucleotide analogue with antiviral activity against hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA polymerase. This phase 2 study compared the efficacy and safety of oral pradefovir (30, 45, 60, or 75 mg) versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF; 300 mg) and aimed to identify the most appropriate dose of pradefovir for the forthcoming phase 3 study. Methods Treatment-naive and experienced (not on treatment >6 months) patients with chronic hepatitis B were eligible. Results A total of 240 participants were randomized and treated in the study (48 per group). Approximately 80% were hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positive, and 10% had liver cirrhosis. The reductions from baseline in HBV DNA levels achieved at week 24 were 5.40, 5.34, 5.33, and 5.40 log10 IU/mL, with pradefovir doses of 30-, 45-, 60-, and 75-mg, respectively, compared with 5.12 log10 IU/mL with TDF. However, HBeAg loss was attained by more participants who received 45-, 60-, or 75-mg pradefovir than by those receiving TDF (12%, 6%, and 9% vs 3%). The TDF group exhibited a more significant increase in serum creatinine than the pradefovir 30- and 45-mg groups, and serum phosphate levels were comparable among all groups. Most adverse events (AEs) were mild (grade 1). No treatment-related severe AEs were reported. Overall, AEs and laboratory abnormalities were comparable to those in the TDF group. Conclusions Pradefovir and TDF exhibited comparable reductions in HBV DNA levels. All treatments were safe and well tolerated. Clinical Trials registration NCT00230503 and China Drug Trials CTR2018042

Objective. The purpose of the study was to investigate the effect of entecavir combined with adefovir dipivoxil on clinical efficacy and TNF-α and IL-6 levels in patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis. Methods. A total of 100 patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis admitted to our hospital between January 2018 and June 2019 were randomly selected and divided into the control group (n = 50) and experimental group (n = 50) according to the order of admission. Among them, the control group patients were treated with entecavir, while the patients in the experimental group received entecavir combined with adefovir dipivoxil. After that, the effective rate of treatment, the incidence of adverse reactions, liver function indexes, liver fibrosis condition, and TNF-α and IL-6 expression levels were all compared between the two groups. Results. The effective rate of treatment in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group, with statistical significance ( p < 0.001 ); the incidence of adverse reactions of the patients in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group, with statistical significance ( p < 0.001 ); the liver function indexes in the experimental group were significantly better than those in the control group, with statistical significance ( p < 0.001 ); the number of patients with liver fibrosis in the experimental group was significantly less than that in the control group, with statistical significance ( p < 0.001 ); the TNF-α and IL-6 expression levels in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group, with statistical significance ( p < 0.001 ). Conclusion. Entecavir combined with adefovir dipivoxil in the treatment of hepatitis B cirrhosis can effectively improve the therapeutic effect and reduce the serum inflammatory factor levels, with high safety, which is worthy of application and popularization.

Nucleoside analogue (NA) therapy for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is associated with improved clinical outcomes, but usually requires long‐term use. Whether treatment can be safely withdrawn and the factors associated with post‐withdrawal outcome are not well defined. To assess long‐term outcomes after stopping antiviral therapy, patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)–negative CHB who had received antiviral therapy for 4 or more years with hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA (≤100 IU/mL) were prospectively withdrawn from antiviral therapy and monitored monthly for the initial 6 months and every 3 months thereafter. Those with clinical relapse were retreated according to severity of relapse. Fifteen patients were withdrawn from lamivudine (4), adefovir (5), or a combination of the two (6) after a mean treatment duration of 8.4 years. The mean age was 45 years, 13 were male, and 8 were initially HBeAg‐positive before treatment. After a mean follow‐up of 6.6 years, outcomes differed by pretreatment HBeAg status. All patients who were HBeAg+ before treatment experienced virological relapse (8 of 8); 6 of 8 experienced clinical relapse; 4 of 8 had ALT flares; 5 of 8 required re‐initiation of treatment, one of whom cleared hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg); and 3 of 8 remained off treatment, one of whom cleared HBsAg. In contrast, 4 of 7 patients who were HBeAg‐negative before treatment experienced virological relapse, 3 of 7 experienced clinical relapse, and 1 of 7 had an alanine aminotransferase (ALT) flare. None restarted treatment, and 4 of 7 cleared HBsAg. Low pre‐withdrawal HBsAg level was predictive of HBsAg loss. Conclusion: NA therapy can be safely withdrawn with long‐term remission and high rates of HBsAg loss in most HBeAg‐negative patients without cirrhosis. Patients who were initially HBeAg+ should not be withdrawn from treatment, because clinical relapse was frequent and often severe.

BACKGROUND Since the initial recognition of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Wuhan, this infectious disease has spread to most areas of the world. The pathogenesis of COVID-19 is yet unclear. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation occurring in COVID-19 patients has not yet been reported. CASE SUMMARY A 45-year-old hepatitis B man with long-term use of adefovir dipivoxil and entecavir for antiviral therapy had HBV reactivation after being treated with methylprednisolone for COVID-19 for 6 d. CONCLUSION COVID-19 or treatment associated immunosuppression may trigger HBV reactivation.

Di-tert-butyl oxymethyl phosphonates were investigated regarding their suitability for preparing the active pharmaceutical ingredient tenofovir (PMPA). First, an efficient and simple access to the crystalline di-tert-butyl(hydroxymethyl)phosphonate was developed. O-Mesylation gave high yields of the active phosphonomethylation reagent. For the synthesis of tenofovir, a two-step sequence was developed using Mg(OtBu)2 as the base for the alkylation of (R)-9-(2-hydroxypropyl)adenine. Subsequent deprotection could be achieved with aqueous acids. (Di-tert-butoxyphosphoryl)methyl methanesulfonate showed to be the most efficient electrophile tested, affording PMPA in 72% yield on a 5 g scale. The developed protocol could also be applied for the preparation of the hepatitis B drug adefovir (64% yield/1 g scale).

Background Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who had exposed to lamivudine (LAM) and telbivudine (LdT) had high risk of developing entecavir (ETV)-resistance after long-term treatment. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and a network meta-analysis on the efficacy and cost-effectiveness on antiviral regimens in CHB patients with ETV-resistance. Data sources We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science for studies on nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) treatment [including tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)-based rescue therapies, adefovir (ADV)-based rescue therapies and double-dose ETV therapy] in CHB patients with ETV-resistance. The network meta-analysis was conducted for 1-year complete virological response (CVR) and biological response (BR) rates using GeMTC and ADDIS. A cost-effective analysis was conducted to select an economic and effective treatment regimen based on the 1-year CVR rate. Results A total of 6 studies were finally included in this analysis. The antiviral efficacy was estimated. On network meta-analysis, the 1-year CVR rate in ETV-TDF [odds ratio (OR) = 22.30; 95 % confidence interval (CI): 2.78-241.93], LAM-TDF (OR = 70.67; 95 % CI: 5.16-1307.45) and TDF (OR = 16.90; 95 % CI: 2.28-186.30) groups were significantly higher than that in the ETV double-dose group; the 1-year CVR rate in the LAM-TDF group (OR = 14.82; 95 % CI: 1.03-220.31) was significantly higher than that in the LAM/LdT-ADV group. The 1-year BR rate of ETV-TDF (OR = 28.68; 95 % CI: 1.70-1505.08) and TDF (OR = 21.79; 95 % CI: 1.43-1070.09) therapies were significantly higher than that of ETV double-dose therapy. TDF-based therapies had the highest possibility to achieve the CVR and BR at 1 year, in which LAM-TDF combined therapy was the most effective regimen. The ratio of cost/effectiveness for 1-year treatment was 8 526, 17 649, 20 651 Yuan in the TDF group, TDF-ETV group, and ETV-ADV group, respectively. Conclusions TDF-based combined therapies such as ETV-TDF and LAM-TDF therapies were the first-line treatment if financial condition is allowed.

Background Evaluate the safety and efficacy of 104-week regimen of Telbivudine(LdT)-based optimization strategy for Chinese patients who have chronic hepatits B(CHB) with HBeAg-negative. Methods This multi-center, open-label, prospective study enrolled 108 HBeAg-negative CHB patients who received LdT (600 mg/day) for 24 weeks, Adefovir (ADV) was added if HBV DNA remained detectable at week 24, otherwise LdT was maintained to use until 104 weeks. HBV DNA, alanine amino transferase (ALT), hepatitis B surface antigen(HBsAg), creatinine kinase(CK), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were measured, safety was assessed. Results Eighty-eight patients (81%) had HBV-DNA undetectable at 24 weeks and maintained to receive LdT monotherapy until 104 weeks, whereas the other 20 patients had HBV-DNA detectable and ADV was used in combination. For all patients, 72% of patients reached ALT normalization at 24 weeks, which increased to 80% at 52 weeks and 104 weeks, respectively.. 81% of total patients had undetectable HBV-DNA at 24 weeks, 92% at 52 weeks, and 94% at 104 weeks. The HBsAg titre declined steadily from baseline to 104 weeks (3.62 vs. 2.98 log10 IU/mL, p 2, p Conclusions LdT was well tolerated and effective, and 94% of patients achieved virological suppression after 104 weeks. Trial registration This study was registered in clinicaltrials.gov on January 31, 2012 and the ID No. was NCT01521975.

The treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is challenging. Herein, we report a multicenter prospective cohort study for the evaluation of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)-based therapy for MDR CHB in a real-life setting. The inclusion criteria comprised patients with resistance to more than two nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) classes and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level of ≥200 IU/mL. The primary end-point was virologic response (VR), defined as undetectable HBV DNA (

Hepatitis delta virus (HDV) infection causes the most severe form of viral hepatitis. PEG-interferon alpha-2a (PEG-IFN alpha-2a) is the only effective treatment but its long-term clinical impact is unclear. the aim of this study was to investigate the long-term outcome after 48 weeks of pegylated interferon alpha-2a therapy. We performed a retrospective follow-up study of the Hep-Net-International-Delta-Hepatitis-Intervention-Study 1 (HIDIT-I trial). Patients had received 48 weeks of treatment with either PEG-IFN alpha-2a plus adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) (Group I), PEG-IFN alpha-2a alone (Group II) or adefovir dipivoxil alone (Group III). Liver-related complications were defined as liver-related death, liver transplantation, liver cancer and hepatic decompensation defined as development of Child-Pugh scores B or C or an increase in Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores of five or more points in relation to baseline values. Patients were considered for further analysis when they were retreated with PEG-IFN alpha-2a. Follow-up data (at least 1 visit beyond post-treatment week 24) were available for 60 patients [Group I, (n = 19), Group II (n = 20), Group III (n = 21)]. Mean time of follow-up was 8.9 (1.6 - 13.4) years. 19 patients were retreated with IFN-based therapy: 42% (n = 8) in PEG-IFN alpha-2a arms and 58% (n = 11) in the adefovir only arm. Clinical complications on long-term follow-up occurred in 17 patients and were associated with nonresponse to therapy and baseline cirrhosis. the annual event-free survival rate in patients with cirrhosis vs noncirrhotic patients at year 5 and 10 was 70% vs 91% and 35% vs 76%. Long-term follow-up of a large randomized clinical trial suggests that off-treatment HDV RNA response to PEG-IFN alpha-2a treatment leads to improved clinical long-term outcome., German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Hannover-Braunschweig; German Liver Foundation; EASL registry grant, This study was funded by the German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Hannover-Braunschweig with a grand to the HepNet Study-House, the German Liver Foundation and an EASL registry grant.

Background/Aims: Suboptimal responses to lamivudine or telbivudine plus adefovir (LAM/LdT+ADV) rescue therapy are common in patients with LAM-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections. We compared patients switched to entecavir plus tenofovir (ETV+TDF) to those maintained on LAM/LdT+ADV.Methods: This prospective randomized controlled trial examined 91 patients whose serum HBV DNA levels were greater than 60 IU/mL after at least 24 weeks of treatment with LAM/LdT+ADV for LAM-resistant HBV. Patients were randomized to receive a new treatment (ETV+TDF, n=45) or maintained on the same treatment (LAM/LdT+ADV, n=46) for 48 weeks. Patients with baseline ADV resistance were excluded.Results: Compared to LAM/LdT+ADV group, ETV+TDF group had more patients with a virologic response (42/45 [93.33%] vs. 3/46 [6.52%], PPP=0.005) and LAM/LdT+ADV maintenance therapy (P=0.001) were negatively associated with virologic response. At week 48, additional ADV- or ETV-associated mutations were cleared in ETV+TDF group, but such mutations were present in 4.3% of patients in LAM/LdT+ADV group (P=0.106). The two groups had similar rates of adverse events.Conclusions: ETV+TDF combination treatment led to a significantly higher rate of virologic response compared to LAM/LdT+ADV combination treatment in patients with LAM-resistant HBV who had suboptimal responses to LAM/LdT+ADV regardless of HBV genotypic resistance profile (NCT01597934).

Purpose Adefovir dipivoxil (AD), a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor is effective against Hepatitis B virus. Its poor oral bioavailability leads to frequent administration causing severe adverse effects. Thereby the entrapment of AD within lipid nanoparticulate systems is a way of increasing AD oral bioavailability as a result of improving intestinal permeability with efficient liver-targeted delivery together with higher drug stability during storage. Methods AD-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (AD-NLCs) were prepared via solvent emulsification diffusion technique adopting 24 full factorial design to study the effect of lipid percentage, presence of egg yolk lecithin, surfactant type and percentage on entrapment efficiency (E.E.%), particle size and percent in-vitro drug released after 8 h (Q8hrs). Results Formula (F12) showed E.E.% of 90.5 ± 0.2%, vesicle size of 240.2 ± 2.5 nm and Q8hrs of 58.55 ± 9.4% was selected as the optimum formula with desirability value of 0.757 based on highest EE%, lowest P.S. and Q8hrs. Further evaluation of the optimized formula using radioiodinated rose bengal (RIRB) in thioacetamide induced liver damage in Swiss Albino mice revealed a higher liver uptake of 22 ± 0.01% ID/g (percent injected dose/g organ) and liver uptake/Blood (T/B) ratio of 2.22 ± 0.067 post 2 h of I.V injection of RIRB compared to 9 ± 0.01% ID/g and 0.64 ± 0.017 in untreated group, respectively. Conclusion NLCs could be successfully used as oral drug delivery carriers of the antiviral drug Adefovir Dipivoxil to the liver with higher stability and oral bioavailability. Graphical abstract.

Xin Ji,* Muye Xia,* Bin Zhou, Shi Liu, GuiChan Liao, Shaohang Cai, Xiaoyong Zhang, Jie Peng State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Viral Hepatitis Research, Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Jie PengDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology Unit, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, No. 1838, North Guangzhou Avenue, Guangzhou 510515, People’s Republic of ChinaTel +86 20 6278 7428Fax +86 20 8771 9653Email pjie138@163.comBackground and Aim: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) RNA has attracted increasing attention as a novel serum marker for intrahepatic HBV replication. However, the predictive value of the serum level of HBV RNA for hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion and viral response among patients with a high viral load (HVL) is unclear. We evaluated the role of the serum level of HBV RNA as a predictor of treatment response in chronic HBV (CHB) patients with an HVL.Patients and Methods: The study cohort was 66 HBeAg-positive CHB patients with an HVL (serum HBV DNA > 1.9× 106 IU/mL) at baseline from our previous prospective cohort study treated with lamivudine (LAM) and adefovir dipivoxil(ADV) (N=31) or entecavir alone (N=35) for ≤ 96 weeks. The serum HBV RNA level was quantified by TaqMan® probe-based reverse transcription real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction at four time points.Results: The baseline serum HBV RNA level (in log10 copies/mL) in patients treated with LAM+ADV and ETV monotherapy was 8.97± 1.22 and 9.15± 0.92, respectively. After nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) therapy, the serum HBV RNA level decreased steadily in all patients (week 0 vs week 12, p< 0.001; week 12 vs week 24, p=0.010; week 24 vs week 48, p< 0.001). Fifty-three (80.3%) patients achieved a virologic response (VR), and 12 (18.2%) achieved HBeAg seroconversion after 96 weeks. Multivariate analyses revealed that the serum HBV RNA level at week 12 could predict HBeAg seroconversion (OR 3.560, 95% CI: 1.39– 9.110, p=0.008) and VR (1.908, 1.115– 3.265, 0.018) at 96 weeks. Analyses of receiver operating characteristic curves indicated that the serum HBV RNA level 12 weeks after NA treatment had predictive value for HBeAg seroconversion (AUC=0.847, p< 0.001) and VR (AUC=0.736, p=0.011).Conclusion: The serum level of HBV RNA at 12 weeks could predict HBeAg seroconversion and a VR during NA treatment in CHB patients with an HVL.Keywords: HBV RNA, HBeAg seroconversion, virological response, high viral load, nucleos(t)ide analogs

Replication stress is a common feature of cancer cells. Ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) and Rad3-related (ATR) signalling, a DNA damage repair (DDR) pathway, is activated by regions of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) that can arise during replication stress. ATR delays cell cycle progression and prevents DNA replication fork collapse, which prohibits cell death and promotes proliferation. Several ATR inhibitors have been developed in order to restrain this protective mechanism in tumours. It is known, however, that despite other effective anticancer chemotherapy treatments targeting DDR pathways, resistance occurs. This begets the need to identify combination treatments to overcome resistance and prevent tumour cell growth. We conducted a drug screen to identify potential synergistic combination treatments by screening an ATR inhibitor (VE822) together with compounds from a bioactive small molecule library. The screen identified adefovir dipivoxil, a reverse transcriptase inhibitor and nucleoside analogue, as a compound that has increased cytotoxicity in the presence of ATR, but not ATM or DNA-dependant protein kinase (DNA-PK) inhibition. Here we demonstrate that adefovir dipivoxil induces DNA replication stress, activates ATR signalling and stalls cells in S phase. This simultaneous induction of replication stress and inhibition of ATR signalling lead to a marked increase in pan-nuclear γH2AX-positive cells, ssDNA accumulation and cell death, indicative of replication catastrophe.

Background and aims Current treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogs (NUCs) safely controls the replication of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and improves prognosis in patients with HBV. However, the inability to completely clear HBV is problematic, and novel therapies are desired. It has been believed that all NUCs have similar functions to inhibit HBV reverse transcriptase. However, our recent findings that only acyclic nucleoside phosphonates (ANPs; adefovir dipivoxil and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) had an additional effect of inducing interferon (IFN)-λ3 in the gastrointestinal tract suggests that ANPs are not only distinct from nucleoside analogs (lamivudine and entecavir) in their structures but also in their functions. Because enteric lipopolysaccharide (LPS) can cross the intestine and affect peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), we hypothesized that orally administered ANPs could have further additional effects to modulate LPS-mediated cytokine profile in PBMCs. Approach and results This study showed that pretreatment of PBMCs, from either healthy volunteers or patients with HBV, with ANPs inhibited LPS-mediated interleukin (IL)-10 production, which reciprocally induced IL-12p70 and tumor necrosis factor-α production in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, the combination of IFN-α and ANPs synergistically enhanced LPS-mediated IL-12p70 production in PBMCs. Mechanistic analyses revealed that cellular metabolites of ANPs directly bound the Akt protein, inhibiting its translocation to the plasma membrane, thereby impairing Akt phosphorylation. Therefore, pretreatment of PBMCs with ANPs impairs LPS-mediated IL-10 production. Conclusions Among NUCs, only ANPs have an additional pharmacological effect modulating LPS-mediated cytokine production, which is expected to produce favorable immune responses toward HBV elimination. This additional immunomodulation by ANPs in PBMCs, as well as IFN-λ3 induction in the gastrointestinal tract, provides insights into HBV treatment.

This protocol for a Cochrane Review is out of date. Auhors have abandoned it.

Background The prevalence of dyslipidemia in China is increasing annually. Current studies suggest that dyslipidemia affects the antiviral efficacy of hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapies, while recent studies suggest that serum lipids influence the response rates of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients receiving PEGylated interferon-alpha (Peg IFN-α) treatment. However, the role of dyslipidemia in the efficacy of nucleoside (acid) analogues (NAs) in CHB patients remains unclear. Methods From January 2010 to December 2013, data from 179 treatment-naive patients with CHB who were hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and had visited the first affiliated hospital of Wenzhou Medical University were assessed. Of these patients, 68 were assigned to the dyslipidemia group (diagnosed with CHB complicated with dyslipidemia) and 111 to the normolipidemic group. The following 3 treatment strategies were performed for all CHB patients over a 5-year period: lamivudine (LAM) plus adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) combination therapy, telbivudine (LdT) monotherapy, and entecavir (ETV) monotherapy. Serum assessments, blood biochemistry, HBV serological markers, HBV DNA before treatment and HBeAg serological conversion and virological responses at different timepoints after treatment were compared between the two groups. Measurement data were compared by τ tests and enumeration data by χ2 tests. Correlation analysis was performed using binary logistic regression analysis. Results The rates of HBeAg seroconversion in the dyslipidemia group at years 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 10.3, 13.2, 17.6, and 22.1%, respectively, which were not significantly lower than those of the normolipidemic group (11.7, 16.2, 18.0 and 33.3%; χ2 = 0.085, 0.293, 0.004, and 2.601, respectively; Ρ > 0.05). However, the rates of HBeAg seroconversion in the dyslipidemia group were significantly lower than those in the normolipidemic group at year 5 (27.9% vs. 43.2%, χ2 = 4.216, Ρ Ρ = 0.038) and male gender (OR = 2.317, Ρ = 0.029) were risk factors associated with HBeAg seroconversion. Conclusions During antiviral therapy, dyslipidemia affects HBeAg seroconversion in CHB patients treated with NAs, but does not affect the virological response.

BACKGROUND Long-term use of nucleotide analogs such as adefovir (ADV) or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) may cause renal impairment. Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) has less systemic exposure than TDF did. The aims were to examine longitudinal changes in renal function and biochemical parameters for 2 years after switching from long-term ADV and TDF to TAF, and to explore factors associated with improved renal function after TAF in patients with chronic hepatitis B. METHODS The prospective observational cohort study included 306 patients with chronic hepatitis B who underwent switching from long-term TDF or ADV to TAF. The primary outcome was the changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) after TAF. RESULTS Among 306 patients, 190 (65.3%) and 106 (34.7%) had chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 1-2 and 3a-4 at baseline. In patients with CKD stages 3a-4, the mean eGFR significantly increased until week 12 and plateaued from week 12 to year 2 (adjusted slope using linear mixed effect models: +9.01 ml/min/1.73 m2 /year until week 12; p

We developed a novel real-time PCR assay that simultaneously evaluates 11 major nucleos(t)ide antiviral (NA) drug resistance mutations (mt) in chronic hepatitis B patients (CHB), including L180M, M204I/V, and V207M (lamivudine [LMV] resistance), N/H238A/T (adefovir [ADF] resistance), which are circulating in Vietnam; and T184G/L, S202I, and M250V (entecavir [ETV] resistance) and A194T (tenofovir resistance), which have been recently reported in several studies across the globe. We detected drug-resistant mt in hepatitis B virus (HBV) samples using our predesigned panel of allele-specific locked-nucleic acid (LNA) probes. Our assay had a high sensitivity of 5% in a low-HBV DNA population of ≥5 × 10(3) IU/ml and was validated in a cohort of 130 treatment-naive children and 98 NA-experienced adults with CHB. Single-point mt for LMV and ADF resistance were detected in 57.7% and 54.1% of the child and adult samples, respectively, with rtV207M (children, 42.3%; adults, 36.7%) and rtN238T/A (children, 15.4%; adults, 16.3%) being the most frequent mt in these populations. Multiple-point mt, including rtL180M-rtM204V- rtN238A and rtL180M-rtM204I, were identified in only two children, resulting in LMV-ADF resistance and reduced ETV susceptibility. In conclusion, this assay accurately identified the mt profile of children (98.4%) and adults (91.2%) with CHB, which is comparable to established methods. This fast and sensitive screening method can be used for the detection of major NA-resistant mt circulating in developing countries, as well as providing a model for the development of similar mt-detection assays, especially for use in nonhospitalized patients who need their results within half a day, before starting treatment.

The hepatitis B virus (HBV) ribonuclease H (RNase H) is an attractive but unexploited drug target. Here, we addressed three limitations to the current state of RNase H inhibitor development: (a) Efficacy has been assessed only in transfected cell lines. (b) Cytotoxicity data are from transformed cell lines rather than primary cells. (c) It is unknown how the compounds work against nucleos(t)ide analog resistant HBV strains. Three RNase H inhibitors from different chemotypes, 110 (α-hydroxytropolone), 1133 (N-hydroxypyridinedione), and 1073 (N-hydroxynapthyridinone), were tested in HBV-infected HepG2-NTCP cells for inhibition of cccDNA accumulation and HBV product formation. 50% effective concentrations (EC(50)s) were 0.049–0.078 μM in the infection studies compared to 0.29–1.6 μM in transfected cells. All compounds suppressed cccDNA formation by >98% at 5 μM when added shortly after infection. HBV RNA, intracellular and extracellular DNA, and HBsAg secretion were all robustly suppressed. The greater efficacy of the inhibitors when added shortly after infection is presumably due to blocking amplification of the HBV cccDNA, which suppresses events downstream of cccDNA formation. The compounds had 50% cytotoxic concentrations (CC(50)s) of 16–100 μM in HepG2-derived cell lines but were nontoxic in primary human hepatocytes, possibly due to the quiescent state of the hepatocytes. The compounds had similar EC(50)s against replication of wild-type, lamivudine-resistant, and adefovir/lamivudine-resistant HBV, as expected because the RNase H inhibitors do not target the viral reverse transcriptase active site. These studies expand confidence in inhibiting the HBV RNase H as a drug strategy and support inclusion of RNase H inhibitors in novel curative drug combinations for HBV.

BackgroundEntecavir (ETV) is recommended as a first-line anti-HBV treatment. However, many chronic hepatitis B patients initiate anti-HBV treatment such as lamivudine and telbivudine with low genetic barriers in China, which leads to compensatory mutations and increases the rate of ETV resistance. The management of ETV resistance in China is an essential clinical issue.MethodsPatients from 2011 to 2017 with nucleos(t)ide analog resistance were screened and 72 patients with ETV resistance were included. These patients received different rescue therapies including an ETV and adefovir (ADV) combination therapy group (n = 25), a tenofovir (TDF) monotherapy group (n = 27), and an ETV and TDF combination therapy group (n = 20). Virologic, biochemical, and serologic responses were compared among the three groups.ResultsThe rate of ETV resistance among all HBV-resistant variants increased from 6.04% in 2011 to 15.02% in 2017. TDF monotherapy and TDF combination groups showed similar rates of negative HBV DNA at 48 weeks (74.07% vs 70.00%, P > 0.05), while the ETV and ADV group showed the worst virologic response (28.00%). Also, TDF monotherapy and TDF combination therapy showed similar decline of HBV DNA at weeks 12, 24, and 48. There was no significant difference in the rates of HBeAg clearance, ALT normalization, and abnormal renal function among the three groups.ConclusionsTDF monotherapy showed a comparable virologic response to TDF and ETV combination therapy and a better virologic response than ETV and ADV combination therapy. Thus, TDF monotherapy is the preferred rescue therapy for ETV resistance.

Introduction: The impact of mutations in the reverse transcriptase region of HBV on serum HBsAg titer and its correlation with HBV DNA is largely unknown. Methodology: A total of 644 patients, with a history of lamivudine or adefovir dipivoxil resistance who underwent genotypic resistance tests, were enrolled in this study. Serum HBsAg, hepatitis B e antigen and HBV DNA were quantified, and the HBV RT region was sequenced and analyzed. Then, the patients were divided into five sub-groups, including M204I/V, L180M+M204I/V, A181T/V, N236T and A181T/V+N236T according to the mutation spectra. Results: HBsAg was lower in the wild-type and A181T/V+N236T groups as compared to the M204I/V, L180M+M204I/V and N236T groups. HBsAg was positively correlated with HBV DNA levels in the wild-type group (r = 0.322, p < 0.01), as well as in the M204I/V, L180M+M204I/V, A181T/V, and N236T subgroups, while no correlation was found in the A181T/V+N236T subgroup (r = 0.159, p = 0.217). Moreover, for patients with N236T mutation, HBsAg was positively correlated with HBV DNA level in the HBeAg negative group (r = 0.435, p = 0.016), but not in the HBeAg positive group (r = 0.105, p = 0.594). For patients with A181T/V or N236T mutation, HBsAg was positively correlated with HBV DNA in older patients (≥ 40 years), but not in younger patients (< 40 years). Conclusions: Serum HBsAg titer and its correlation with HBV DNA may be affected by mutations in the reverse transcriptase region of HBV, that should be re-evaluated in patients with antiviral resistance.

Aims Previous studies have shown that baseline high viral load is closely related to treatment response in chronic hepatitis B (CHB). This study was designed to evaluate the differences of treatment responses between de novo lamivudine (LAM) plus adefovir (ADV) combination therapy compared with entecavir monotherapy (ETV). Methods A total of 185 HBeAg-positive CHB patients with high viral load were enrolled and assigned to the LAM+ADV group (n=90) or ETV group (n=95). Clinical variables are extracted from medical records. Results No significant differences in baseline variables were found between the two groups before antiviral treatment. After 104 weeks of antiviral therapy, the mean HBV DNA viral load in the LAM+ADV group decreased from 8.01±0.65 log10 copies/mL to 0.41±1.04 log10 copies/mL, compared with 8.04±0.57 log10 copies/mL to 0.57±1.28 log10 copies/mL in the ETV group (P=0.35). The virological response rate of LAM+ADV group was 82.2% (74/90) at 104 weeks of treatment, and 80.0% (76/95) in the ETV group (P=0.70). For HBeAg serological responses, HBeAg loss occurred in 23.3% (21/90) and 17.9% (17/95) in the LAM+ADV group and the ETV group, respectively (P=0.36). HBeAg seroconversion was observed in 15.6% (14/90) and 15.8% (15/95) in the LAM+ADV group and ETV group, respectively (P=0.96). However, after 104 weeks of treatment, genotypic resistance was confirmed in 8 cases in the LAM+ADV group, a proportion of 8.8% (8/90), compared with an absence of genotypic resistance in the ETV group (P=0.003). Conclusion Both de novo combination therapy of LAM+ADV and ETV monotherapy could effectively inhibit HBV replication in patients with high viral load. However, the rate of genotypic resistance in LAM+ADV treatment remains a concern. For CHB patients with high viral load, ETV treatment may be superior.

골다공증은 호르몬의 변화와 무기질 감소에 의해 골밀도의 감소를 유발하여 골절의 위험을 높이는 질환이다. 최근 보고에 의하면, 간염바이러스 및 에이즈 치료제로 사용되고 있는 Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV)의 장기적 복용에서 골다공증 부작용이 유발할 수 있음이 보고 되고 있다. 이에 대한 연구수행을 위해 골모세포주 hFOB1.19와 혈관내피세포 HUVEC을 이용하여 ADV에 대한 생물학적 연관성을 평가하였다. 우선적으로 ADV를 농도별로 처리한 후 각 세포와 핵의 형태학적 분석을 위해 DAPI와 crystal violet 염색을 시행하였다. 또한 세포 증식에 대한 약물 효과를 평가하기 위하여 CCK-8분석과 골모세포에 대한 분화유도 및 억제 효과를 확인하기 위하여, ALP 염색을 진행하였다. 그 결과, ADV는 hFOB1.19 세포와 HUVEC 세포에서 농도 의존적으로 세포의 비대 현상을 유발하였고, 세포의 증식이 억제되었다. 이러한 원인들을 규명하기 위해 TGF-β발현을 조사하였을 뿐만 아니라 이러한 발현 감소에 의한 생물학적 영향이 골모세포로부터 골세포로의 분화 과정에 관여하고 있음을 확인 할 수 있었다. 결론적으로, 본 연구에서는 ADV 약물이 골모세포와 혈관내피세포의 TGF-β의 발현을 억제하여 핵의 크기 증가와 세포형태의 비대증을 유발하며, 세포의 증식억제 및 골모세포 분화능에 영향을 줌으로서 골다공증을 유발할 수 있는 가능성을 확인하였다. 이러한 결과는 ADV 복용에 따른 골다공증 발병 원인을 이해하기 위한 기초 연구 및 이를 이용한 임상 영역에 활용 될 수 있을 것으로 사료된다.

In this paper, two novel polymorphs of adefovir dipivoxil-saccharin (AD-SAC) cocrystals, forms II and III, were prepared and characterized by PXRD, DSC, FT-IR and SEM. Polymorphic transformations of these two forms and the known form (form I) were also investigated. In comparison to form I, forms II and III of AD-SAC cocrystals showed different thermal behaviors on DSC, characteristic diffraction peaks on PXRD and absorption spectra on FT-IR. In addition, form I exhibited an irregular plate-like shape, while forms II and III showed as needle-like shape and stubby columnar shape, respectively. During the heating process on DSC, forms I and II underwent solid-solid transformations to form III with endothermic transition peaks, suggesting that forms I and II were enantiotropically related to form III. Furthermore, slurry conversion experiments in ethanol showed forms II and III would quickly convert to form I by solution-mediated transformation, indicating that form I was the most stable form among three forms of AD-SAC cocrystal from 15 to 50 °C.

Viral hepatitis is a common viral infection, can be dangerous, involves the body and leads to inflammation and destruction of tissue and normal function of the liver. Viral hepatitis is a major cause of premature death in human beings. According to the World Health Organization, it was assumed that there are more than 385 and 170 million carriers of hepatitis B and C in the world, respectively, and more than a million deaths occur due to hepatitis each year. There are a few specific drugs to treat hepatitis. To overcome some of these problems, nanoparticle systems containing organic and inorganic compounds are used for pharmaceutical purpose. One of these nanostructures is dendrimer. Dendrimers are repetitively branched nanomolecules. In this study, a theoretical study of the structural probabilities of nanostructure complex formation between polyamidoamine dendrimers (PAMAM) and some drugs that suppress the growth of hepatitis virus (Adefovir, Entecavir, Telbivudine, Lamivudine, Tenofovir: 1–5) has been carried out. The possibility of drug release, drug delivery and drug separation by PAMAM has been investigated. MMFF94 method has been used to provide results and medical solutions. In all the drug–PAMAM complexes, the relative energy levels of the complex energy have been calculated by the RHF/PM6 method. Medicine delivery, release process of drugs and separation of drugs from the in vivo and in vitro real sample were the main enforceable results obtained from this theoretical study of medicines 1–5 & PAMAM. This model has predicted an imaginary method to separate the medicines from real samples and study the drug release process of the discussed complexes. The imaginary separation procedure that suppresses the growth of hepatitis virus–1–5 medicine mixture in in vitro samples is discussed. It is possible to collect compounds 1 and 2 by PAMAM and separate Adefovir, Telbivudine and Tenofovir (3–5) from the mixture of the sample of medicines 1–5.

Background and aim Long-term treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) has demonstrated suppression of viral replication outside of China. This study aims to assess efficacy, resistance and safety of TDF for up to 240 weeks in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Methods Patients (HBeAg-positive or HBeAg-negative) who were randomised to receive TDF 300 mg or adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) 10 mg once daily in the 48-week double-blind phase (N = 498) were eligible to enter the open-label TDF phase (TDF–TDF and ADV–TDF groups) for additional 192 weeks. Results Overall, 457/512 (89.3%) randomised patients completed 240 weeks of treatment. Virological suppression was achieved in 84.5% and 87.9% in HBeAg-positive patients and 89.6% and 89.5% in HBeAg-negative patients in TDF–TDF and ADV–TDF groups, respectively, at week 240. The majority of patients from both groups had normalized alanine transaminase levels. More patients had HBeAg loss (41.7% vs. 36.4%) and HBeAg seroconversion (32.0% vs. 28.3%) in TDF–TDF than in ADV–TDF group, respectively. Only one HBeAg-positive patient in TDF–TDF group had HBsAg loss at week 240. No evidence of resistance to TDF was observed. The incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups (TDF–TDF, 56.4% vs. ADV–TDF, 51.6%). One patient had serum creatinine elevation ≥ 0.5 mg/dL above baseline, and three patients had confirmed grade 3/4 phosphorus abnormalities ( Conclusion In Chinese patients with chronic HBV, long-term treatment with TDF showed sustained viral suppression without development of resistance up to 240 weeks. No new safety concerns were found with TDF in this patient population. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier NCT01300234; GSK Clinical Study Register 114648.

A 68-year-old man with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic hepatitis B infection was referred to the nephrology department before planned surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma. He had been receiving low-dose adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) for 11 years. Laboratory findings revealed impaired re-absorption in the proximal renal tubules. He had been diagnosed with diabetic kidney disease and osteomalacia due to vitamin D deficiency; thus, ADV was not discontinued until he was referred to us. In this case, concomitant diabetes mellitus and vitamin D deficiency might have prevented the early diagnosis of ADV-induced Fanconi syndrome.

The interaction between cucuribit[7]uril (Q[7]) and Adefovir (ADV) has been studied in aqueous solution by 1H NMR spectroscopy, electronic absorption spectroscopy, Isothermal Titration Calorimetry and mass spectrometry. The results revealed that an inclusion complex was formed via encapsulation of the purine rings of the guest ADV, while the phosphonomethoxyethyl group was prevented from entering the cavity. ITC data revealed that the formation of this 1:1 inclusion complex is mainly driven by favourable enthalpy changes. Studies investigating the release of ADV from the inclusion complex revealed enhanced rates under acidic conditions, although the rates were slower than observed for the free guest under the same conditions. Thermal stability studies indicated that the included form of ADV was more stable that the free form.

Background: Germany is a low prevalence country for hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection with higher prevalence in vulnerable groups. The number of treated chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients is unknown. We aimed to determine the number of CHB patients treated with nucleos(t)ide analogs (NUCs), the treatment costs within the statutory health insurance (SHI) in Germany and per patient per month.Methods: Data on pharmacy bills of NUCs to patients with SHI between 2008 and 2019 were purchased from Insight Health™ and described. Negative binomial regression was used for trend analysis.Results: Number of patients increased between 2008 and 2019 (4.9% per year) with little changes in treatment options. Overall prescription costs were increasing (6.7% per year on average) until the introduction of tenofovir and entecavir generics in 2017 after which costs decreased by 31% in 2019. Average therapy costs peaked at 498 Euro per patient per month in 2016 and decreased to 214 Euro in 2019. Prescriptions changed from 30 to 90 pills per pack over time. HBV therapy was prescribed to 97% by three medical specialist groups, mainly specialists in internal medicine (63%), followed by hospital-based outpatient clinics (20%) and general practitioners (15%). Contrary to guideline recommendation, adefovir was still prescribed after 2011 for 1–5% of patients albeit with decreasing tendency. Prescriptions per 100,000 inhabitants were highest in Berlin and Hamburg.Conclusion: Our data shows, that the number of treated CHB patients increased steadily, while NUC therapy costs decreased. We recommend continued testing and treatment for those eligible to prevent advanced liver disease and possibly decrease further transmission of HBV.

ObjectivesTo analyze the genotypes and reverse transcriptase mutations gene sites in hepatitis B (HBV) patients in northern Henan Province from 2016 to 2018, which treated by tenofovir dipivoxil(TDF), Lbivudine(LDT), adefovir(ADV), lamivudine (LAM) and entecavir(ETV) analogues, to provide evidences for rational drug use and antiviral therapy for HBV patients.MethodsHBV patients’ serum DNA was extracted, specific primers were designed for YMDD mutation sites in conservative regions; DNA sequencing of the PCR products was carried out by PCR amplification combined with Dideoxygenation termination sequencing(DDT), and then analyzed genotype and reverse transcriptase mutations gene sites of HBV patients.ResultsWe collected 148 samples of HBV patients in northern Henan Province from 2016 to 2018; 97.97% of HBV patients were genotype C and 2.03% were genotype B; there are 46 cases of LAM and FTC resistance mutation, respectively; 28 cases of LDT resistance mutation, 10 cases of ADV resistance mutation, 8 cases of ETV resistance mutation, and 1 case of TDF resistance mutation were detected; the mutation rates of drug resistance was 43.45% in HBV patients with genotype C and 33.33% in HBV patients with genotype B. There was no significant difference in the distribution rate between the two genotypes (P>0.05). The most common mutations types were M204M|V and M204M|I. The M204M|V mutation type often occurred in combination of M204M|V+L180M|L+L173V|L and M204M|V+L180M|L and M204M|V+ L180M|L+V173V|M, while M204M|I mutation type was often occurred alone, M204M|V+L180M|L combination appeared alone or in combination. N236+A181 base substitution was the dominant site in ADV resistance. ETV resistance mutation was based on LAM and ETV resistance, mainly were T184 and S202 base substitution; and LDT resistance mutation was M204M|I. ConclusionIn this article, PCR and DDT DNA sequencing were used to detect multisite resistance mutations of HBV reverse transcriptase gene in HBV patients. It was found that most of the genotypes of HBV patients in northern Henan Province were genotype C, the combination of drug resistance mutations was complex, and the mutation rates of multidrug resistance genes was high. There was no significant difference in the distribution rate of HBV genotypes among the detected patients, those data may provide evidences for the detection and confirmation of HBV resistance and rational drug use in HBV patients in the region.

Background Prophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) represents an efficient strategy for reducing the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT). Unfortunately, the long‐term use of HBIG presents high costs. Therefore, the use of prophylaxis based only on nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUC) has been recently postulated. The present meta‐analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of HBIG ± NUC vs HBIG alone or NUC alone in post‐LT HBV recurrence prophylaxis. Materials and methods A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed and Cochrane databases. The primary outcome investigated was the HBV recurrence after LT. Three analyses were done comparing the effect of (a) HBIG + NUC vs HBIG alone; (b) HBIG+NUC vs NUC alone; and (c) HBIG alone vs NUC alone. Sub‐analyses were also performed investigating the effect of low and high genetic barrierto‐recurrence NUC. Results Fifty‐one studies were included. The summary OR (95%CI) showed a decreased risk with the combination of HBIG + NUC vs HBIG alone for HBV recurrence, being 0.36 (95% CI = 0.22‐0.61; P

Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) is widely used for chronic hepatitis B therapy in China. To explore the clinical features and prognosis of ADV-induced osteomalacia and to analyze the association between osteomalacia and genetic variants in 51 drug transporters genes. Clinical and follow-up data of the ADV-treated patients were collected. Target capture sequencing was used to identify genetic variations of 51 drug transporter genes. A total of 193 hepatitis B patients treated with ADV were enrolled, of whom 140 had osteomalacia. The other 53 without osteomalacia were included in the control group. The median duration of ADV treatment before the onset of osteomalacia was 6.5 years (range:1.5–7 years). We found that most patients with osteomalacia had hypophosphatemia, high serum alkaline phosphatase levels, hypouricemia, nondiabetic glycosuria, proteinuria. Stopping ADV administration, supplementing calcitriol and calcium were effective treatments. During 3–6 months of follow-up, the clinical symptoms and biochemical indicators of patients with osteomalacia have been significantly improved. There was no significant difference in duration of adefovir treatment in patients with or without osteomalacia (p = 0.791). Through regression analysis, we found that age was a risk factor for osteomalacia [per 1 year, odds ratio (OR), 1.053; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.020–1.087; p = 0.015]. 1992 single nucleotide variants were found using target capture sequencing. However, the associations of genetic variants of 51 drug transporter genes and the risk of osteomalacia were negligible. Osteomalacia is prone to occur in patients with chronic hepatitis B treated with long-term ADV at a therapeutic dose. After standard treatment, the prognosis is mostly good. We failed to find genetic variants that can predict the risk of ADV-induced osteomalacia.

Nucles(t)ide analogs (NAs) are effective for chronic hepatitis B (CHB). NAs suppress hepatic decompensation and hepatocarcinogenesis, leading to a dramatic improvement of the natural course of patients with CHB. However, renal dysfunction is becoming an important issue for the management of CHB. Renal dysfunction develops in patients with the long-term treatment of NAs including adefovir dipivoxil and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. Recently, several studies have reported that the newly approved tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) has a safe profile for the kidney due to greater plasma stability. In this mini-review, we discuss the effectiveness of switching to TAF for NAs-related renal tubular dysfunction in patients with CHB.

Graphical abstract, Since the 1950s, great efforts have been made to develop antiviral agents against many infectious diseases such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), herpes simplex virus (HSV), and varicella-zoster virus (VZV). Among the list of nearly 106 antiviral agents approved in the past five decades, Prof. Erik De Clercq has contributed to the development of 7 antiviral drugs: tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (Viread®) for HIV and HBV treatment, tenofovir alafenamide (Vemlidy®) for HIV and HBV treatment, brivudine (Zostex®) for HSV-1 and VZV treatment, valacyclovir (Valtrex®) for HSV and VZV treatment, adefovir dipivoxil (Hepsera®) for HBV treatment, stavudine (Zerit®) for HIV treatment, and cidofovir (Vistide®) for treating HCMV retinitis in AIDS patients. In addition to the above antiviral drugs, his contributions include two anti-cancer drugs: rabacfosadine (Tanovea®-CA1) for canine lymphoma and plerixafor (Mozobil®) for multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. These achievements are driven by his life-long passions for antiviral research and successful collaborations worldwide. To honor the 80th birthday of Prof. Erik De Clercq, this study highlights his scientific achievements and the importance of life-long passions and collaborations in the success of antiviral research and drug development.

Nucleoside and nucleotide analogues are essential antivirals in the treatment of infectious diseases such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), herpes simplex virus (HSV), varicella-zoster virus (VZV), and human cytomegalovirus (HCMV). To celebrate the 80th birthday of Prof. Dr. Erik De Clercq on 28 March 2021, this review provides an overview of his contributions to eight approved nucleos(t)ide drugs: (i) three adenosine nucleotide analogues, namely tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (Viread®) and tenofovir alafenamide (Vemlidy®) against HIV and HBV infections and adefovir dipivoxil (Hepsera®) against HBV infections; (ii) two thymidine nucleoside analogues, namely brivudine (Zostex®) against HSV-1 and VZV infections and stavudine (Zerit®) against HIV infections; (iii) two guanosine analogues, namely valacyclovir (Valtrex®, Zelitrex®) against HSV and VZV and rabacfosadine (Tanovea®-CA1) for the treatment of lymphoma in dogs; and (iv) one cytidine nucleotide analogue, namely cidofovir (Vistide®) for the treatment of HCMV retinitis in AIDS patients. Although adefovir dipivoxil, stavudine, and cidofovir are virtually discontinued for clinical use, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and tenofovir alafenamide remain the most important antivirals against HIV and HBV infections worldwide. Overall, the broad-spectrum antiviral potential of nucleos(t)ide analogues supports their development to treat or prevent current and emerging infectious diseases worldwide.

Summary Background To eliminate mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of hepatitis B virus (HBV), peripartum antiviral prophylaxis might be required for pregnant women infected with HBV who have a high risk of MTCT despite infant immunoprophylaxis. We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of peripartum antiviral prophylaxis to inform the 2020 WHO guidelines. Methods In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CENTRAL, CNKI, and Wanfang for randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies of peripartum antiviral prophylaxis versus placebo or no prophylaxis, with no language restriction, published from database inception until March 28, 2019. We used search terms covering HBV, antiviral therapy, and pregnancy. We included studies that enrolled pregnant women with chronic infection with HBV who received antiviral prophylaxis anytime during pregnancy; that included any of the following antivirals: adefovir, emtricitabine, entecavir, lamivudine, telbivudine, tenofovir alafenamide fumarate, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; and that reported the following outcomes: MTCT, indicated by infant HBsAg positivity or HBV DNA positivity, or both, at age 6–12 months, and any infant or maternal adverse events. Two reviewers independently extracted data. Our primary endpoint was MTCT based on infant HBsAg positivity. We assessed pooled odds ratios (ORs) of the efficacy of peripartum antiviral prophylaxis to reduce the risk of MTCT. We assessed safety of prophylaxis by pooling risk differences. The protocol for the systematic review was pre-registered in PROSPERO, CRD42019134614. Findings Of 7463 articles identified, 595 articles were eligible for full-text review and 129 studies (in 157 articles) were included. The following antivirals were assessed in the meta-analysis: tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg (19 studies, with 1092 mothers and 1072 infants), lamivudine 100–150 mg (40 studies, with 2080 mothers and 2007 infants), and telbivudine 600 mg (83 studies, with 6036 mothers and 5971 infants). The pooled ORs for randomised controlled trials were similar, at 0·10 (95% CI 0·03–0·35) for tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, 0·16 (0·10–0·26) for lamivudine, and 0·14 (0·09–0·21) for telbivudine. The pooled ORs in non-randomised studies were 0·17 (0·10–0·29) for tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, 0·17 (0·12–0·24) for lamivudine, and 0·09 (0·06–0·12) for telbivudine. We found no increased risk of any infant or maternal safety outcomes after peripartum antiviral prophylaxis. Interpretation Peripartum antiviral prophylaxis is highly effective at reducing the risk of HBV MTCT. Our findings support the 2020 WHO recommendation of administering antivirals during pregnancy, specifically tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, for the prevention of HBV MTCT. Funding World Health Organization.

This is the first case of adefovir dipivoxil (ADV)-induced hypophosphatemic osteomalacia (HO) and Fanconi’s syndrome in which bone mineral density (BMD) is continuously reduced after drug discontinuation. Sustained elevation of urine β2-MG also supports the recent view that ADV-induced renal injury is not completely reversible.

We treated a 51-year-old Japanese man with chronic hepatitis B (viral load 7.6 LC/mL, genotype C). Hepatitis B virus DNA and HBe antigen were undetectable during the administration of the nucleic acid analogs (NUCs) lamivudine and adefovir, although the concentration of HBs antigen (HBsAg) was 851.2 IU/mL. The HBsAg levels were reduced 150-fold when pegylated-interferon (Peg-IFN) α-2a was administered weekly for 48 weeks and did not increase during the rest period. Therefore, Peg-IFNα-2a was administered twice each week. During this time, HBsAg reached undetectable concentrations, and HBs antibody was detected and continued to be detectable during the three-year follow-up. These unprecedented findings suggest that IFN may contribute to the seroclearance of HBsAg in patients treated with NUCs.

The hepatitis B virus (HBV) causes chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, liver failure, and cancer. If treatment is not started, it can lead to liver transplant and death. Drugs used in the treatment of HBV infection slow down or stop the damage to the liver, both liver and nonliver. We analyzed the drugs used to treat HBV infection because they have different properties. The presence of different drugs can sometimes cause confusion for doctors in practice. The fuzzy-based preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluations (PROMETHEE), which is one of the successful multicriteria decision-making techniques, was applied by using the guidelines of the specified HBV treatment drugs in order to decrease the complexity of the selection of the effective HBV treatment. While choosing the drugs for the treatment of HBV patients, different criteria have importance based on the doctors, the treatment methods, and the host. Drugs used in the treatment of HBV were evaluated and compared according to their criteria with the PROMETHEE technique. It was concluded that by using the fuzzy PROMETHEE method to evaluate the effectiveness of HBV regimens in the presence of different factors, tenofovir alafenamide, entecavir, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, lamivudine, telbivudine, adefovir, and pegylated interferon were found to be effective in the treatment of HBV infection, respectively.

The goal of therapy for chronic hepatitis B is to decrease the risk of liver-related complications including progression to cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and death. Given that complete elimination of hepatitis B virus (HBV) from host is not possible with current available treatment owing to persistence of covalently closed circular DNA inside hepatocyte, the primary target for treatment should be to suppress HBV replication and reduce serum HBV DNA at the lowest possible levels to achieve the goals. Currently, five approved nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUC) are available for treating chronic hepatitis B in most countries: l-nucleosides (lamivudine and telbivudine), deoxyguanosine analogue (entecavir), and acyclic nucleoside phosphonates (adefovir dipivoxil and tenofovir). These NUCs act primarily by inhibiting the reverse transcription of the pregenomic HBV RNA to the first strand of HBV DNA. The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, European Association for the Study of the Liver, and Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver practice guidelines recommend entecavir or TDF as preferred first-line monotherapies due to their superior efficacy and high barrier to resistance over comparable drugs. NUCs are administered orally and have favorable safety profiles over the course of several years. Many data have consistently shown that long-term suppression of HBV DNA replication by NUCs leads to the improvement in hepatic inflammation and fibrosis, hepatic function, and survival of the patients. However, it has been controversial whether the decrease in the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma could be achieved by the direct effects of NUCs apart from that by decrease in hepatic inflammation.

Kushenin (KS) has become a traditional Chinese medicine preparation that plays an important role in treating chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Many clinical studies have discussed its curative effect and safety in combination with adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) or entecavir (ETV) for treating CHB, but there is still a lack of a systematic analysis. Therefore, this study evaluated the efficacy and safety of KS through a meta-analysis to better guide clinical treatment. Seven databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning KS combined with ADV or ETV for treating CHB. The primary outcomes included serum viral indices and adverse events, and the secondary outcomes were liver function indices. The risk of bias of the included RCTs was appraised by Cochrane software. STATA 15.1 and Review Manager 5.3 software were used for the meta-analysis. Thirty-two RCTs recruiting 3343 patients with CHB were collected for this meta-analysis. KS combined with ETV or ADV led to an amelioration of the CHB index to various degrees. In short, the meta-analysis indicated that the combination group, compared to the single group, showed great improvement in HBeAg seroconversion, frequency of undetectable HBV-DNA levels, loss of serum HBeAg, and loss of serum HBsAg. The combination treatment also decreased serum HBV-DNA levels when compared to the levels after the single treatment. However, KS combined with ADV or ETV displayed no remarkable difference in the incidence of adverse events or in serum ALT levels. Current evidence showed that, compared with the use of either drug alone, KS combined with ADV or ETV can improve the clinical efficacy of CHB treatment.

To investigate whether IL-21 levels predict treatment outcomes of salvage therapy among patients with suboptimal response (SOR) to nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs), serum IL-21 levels were measured in a prospective cohort of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients with SOR to antiviral therapy. The patients switched therapy to entecavir (ETV) with or without adefovir (ADV) for 104 weeks. IL-21 levels at treatment week 12 in patients who achieved HBeAg loss with undetectable levels of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-DNA at week 104 were the primary endpoint and the results were compared with those of corresponding patients without such an endpoint. Furthermore, IL-21 levels at treatment week 12 in patients who achieved an HBeAg-level decline at week 104 were assessed as the secondary endpoint. Among 24 enrolled patients with SOR to ADV (n=21), telbivudine (n=2) or ETV (n=1), the median (10-90th percentile) levels of HBeAg, HBV-DNA and ALT at baseline were 2.7 (0.2-3.1) log10 S/CO, 5.2 (3.5-7.5) log10 IU/ml and 0.9 (0.5-3.1) upper limit of normal, respectively. Comparison of the patients with and without HBeAg loss at week 104 indicated that their mean IL-21 levels did not significantly differ at week 12 (63.0±14.4 vs. 55.9±10.5 pg/ml; P=0.26). In the secondary endpoint analyses of patients with and without HBeAg level decline, the elevated levels of IL-21 at the first 12 weeks were significantly higher in the decline group (15.6±8.3 vs. 3.1±13.2 pg/ml; P=0.03). Following adjustment for confounding factors, the elevated levels of IL-21 from baseline to week 12 independently predicted an HBeAg level decline at week 104 (odds ratio=1.137, R2=0.23; P=0.047). In conclusion, the serum IL-21 levels at the first 12 weeks during the salvage therapy independently predicted HBeAg level decline at treatment week 104 in patients with SOR to NAs (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01829685; date of registration, April 2013).

Multidrug-resistance hepatitis B virus (MDR HBV), defined as those with mutations resistant to both nucleoside analogs lamivudine/telbivudine/entecavir (LAM/LdT/ETV) and nucleotide analog adefovir (ADV), has potential to cause treatment difficulty. To clarify clinical prevalence and virological features of MDR HBV, we investigated serum samples from 28,236 chronic HBV-infected patients with treatment of nucleoside/nucleotide analogs. All patients underwent resistance testing in the Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital between 2007 and 2019. MDR mutations were screened by direct sequencing; MDR strains (with mutations co-located on the same viral genome) were verified by clonal sequencing (≥20 clones/sample) and subjected to phenotypic analysis if necessary. MDR mutations were detected in 0.81% (229/28,236) patients. MDR strains were verified in 83.0% (190/229) of MDR mutation-positive patients. As ETV-resistance mutation (ETVr) had additional mutation(s) on LAMr conferring more resistance, MDR mutations fell into LAMr + ADVr and ETVr + ADVr subsets. Sixteen mutation patterns of MDR strains were verified, including eight with LAMr + ADVr and eight with ETVr + ADVr. Refractory to sequential therapies of LAM/LdT/ETV and ADV were closely linked with MDR HBV development. Ten representative MDR strains (five LAMr + ADVr and five ETVr + ADVr) tested all had decrease in replication capacity compared to wild-type strains and decrease extent was positively related with the number of primary resistance on viral genome. Compared to ADV + ETV, TDF/TDF + ETV showed higher inhibitory rates on MDR HBV, especially for the five ETVr + ADVr strains (74.5%-97.6% vs. 60.2%-79.5%, all P 0.05). This study significantly extends the knowledge on MDR HBV and has clinical implications for resistance management.

Not required for Clinical Vignette.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of switching to tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) in patients who had received a nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). The data from 33 Japanese patients with CHB who received TAF therapy after using NA [adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) and/or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)] were retrospectively analyzed. Specifically, the biochemical and virological markers from the start of the TAF treatment to 6 months later were assessed. Comparative evaluation was performed by dividing patients into two groups: Long-term (n=19) and short-term administration groups (n=14), with a cutoff administration duration of 10 years. In all 33 patients, the levels of serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg; 1,126±1,724 to 1,001±1,591 IU/ml; P