Search

In developing countries, typhoid fever is a common cause of febrile illness accompanied by abdominal pain and weakness. It is caused by Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi. Humans are the only known reservoir of infection, and typhoid fever is common in regions where access to clean water and sanitation is limited. The antimicrobials of choice for a case of typhoid fever acquired outside Pakistan are third generation cephalosporins. Lately, cases of extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Salmonella Typhi have been reported in people with a travel history to Pakistan. We present a case of XDR typhoid fever which relapsed after treatment with meropenem.

Background Reported β-lactam allergy (BLA) is very common, yet less than 10% of these patients exhibit true hypersensitivity. When faced with reported BLAs, physicians often choose alternative antibiotics which can be associated with C. difficile infection, drug-resistance development, poorer outcomes, & increased costs. Effective identification of these patients is necessary for subsequent, appropriate BLA “de-labeling.” Here, we conducted a single-center analysis of alternative antibiotic utilization amongst patients reporting BLA and compare the frequency of drug-resistant infections and C. difficile infection in allergic & non-allergic patients. Methods This is a retrospective review of adult patients hospitalized at The University of Texas Medical Branch from 1/1/2015 to 12/31/2019. Pooled electronic medical records were filtered by antibiotic orders and reported allergies to penicillins or cephalosporins. Patients with drug-resistant and/or C. difficile infection (CDI) were identified by ICD-10 codes. Microsoft Excel & MedCalc were used for statistical calculations. Results Data were available for 118,326 patients and 9.3% (11,982) reported a BLA, with the highest rates seen in those receiving aztreonam (85.9%, 530/617) & clindamycin (33.7%, 3949/11718). Amongst patients reporting BLA, high ratios-of-consumption (relative to all patients receiving antibiotics) were seen with aztreonam (7.0), clindamycin (2.7), cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitors (2.4), & daptomycin (2.1). Compared to the non-BLA population, BLA patients more frequently experienced MRSA infection (3.0% vs 1.5%, OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.79–2.23, p< 0.0001), β-lactam resistance (1.2% vs 0.6%, OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.72–2.49, p< 0.0001), and CDI (1.2% vs 0.7%, OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.54–2.23, p< 0.0001). Conclusion Our measured BLA rate matches approximate expectations near 10%. Moreover, these patients experienced significantly higher frequencies of drug-resistant bacterial infections and CDI. Targeted inpatient penicillin allergy testing stands to be particularly effective in those patients receiving disproportionately utilized alternative agents (e.g. aztreonam, clindamycin, daptomycin). β-lactam allergy “de-labeling” in these patients is likely a valuable antimicrobial stewardship target. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

A paradigm shift has occurred in the last decade from chemotherapy to targeted therapy for the management of many patients with advanced sarcoma. This work identifies a combination of targeted agents and doxorubicin that are effective against small cell sarcoma cell lines. Three small cell sarcoma cell lines were studied: RD18 (rhabdomyosarcoma), A204 (undifferentiated sarcoma) and TC 71 (Ewing's sarcoma). Each cell line was exposed to increasing concentrations of vorinostat (HDAC inhibitor), 17-DMAG (HSP90 inhibitor), abacavir (anti-telomerase) or sorafenib (tyrosine kinase inhibitor) alone, combined with one another, or combined with doxorubicin. Cell viability, cell cycle analysis and apoptosis were assessed by MTS assay, propidium iodide-Annexin V staining, and caspase 3/7 activity, respectively. The Chou and Talalay combination index (CI) was used to determine whether the effects were additive (CI = 1), synergistic (CI 1) or antagonistic (CI 1). In monotherapy, targeted agents achieved 30-90% reductions in viability, with the exception of abacavir. Dual-targeted combination therapies with vorinostat, sorafenib and 17-DMAG demonstrated synergy. Abacavir was antagonistic with every other drug and was not further studied. Both vorinostat and 17-DMAG synergized with doxorubicin, achieving 60% cell killing compared to 12% with doxorubicin alone. No synergy was observed for sorafenib with doxorubicin. The triple therapy vorinostat, 17-DMAG and doxorubicin did not show synergy, but increased the subG1 population at 24H, from 30% to 70% compared to monotherapies with an increase in apoptosis. This work provides evidence of synergy of combinations of vorinostat, 17-DMAG and sorafenib in small cell sarcoma. In addition to doxorubicin, these combinations enhance doxorubicin cytotoxicity at therapeutically relevant concentrations.

Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (MRSA-B) may fail to improve with standard monotherapy, particularly in patients with multifocal infection, incomplete source control, or persistent bacteremia. Synergy observed in vitro between ceftaroline (CPT) and daptomycin (DAP) or vancomycin (VAN) may translate into clinical benefit. Here, we describe our experience with DAP/CPT and VAN/CPT for complicated MRSA-B after monotherapy failure. Methods: Single-center, retrospective review of consecutive patients treated with DAP/CPT or VAN/CPT for MRSA-B after monotherapy failure from 1 January 2016 to 30 November 2018. Results: We identified 11 instances of combination therapy in 10 patients (DAP/CPT = 6, VAN/CPT = 5) with 1 patient receiving VAN/CPT followed by DAP/CPT. Rates of multifocal infection, incomplete source control, persistent bacteremia, and infective endocarditis were high (100%, 80%, 60%, and 60%, respectively). Combination therapy was initiated most commonly for persistent bacteremia (60%). When patients were persistently bacteremic, median preceding duration was 13 days and median time to clearance was 3 days. Total microbiologic cure rate was 100%. There were zero instances of bacteremia relapse at 30 days (30D) or 60 days (60D). All-cause 30D and 60D mortality rates were 11.1% and 33.3%, respectively. Conclusions: Combination therapy demonstrated success in diverse cases of refractory MRSA-B, including instances of persistent bacteremia paired with incomplete source control. Optimal timing and therapeutic cadence for combination therapy remain unclear. Our findings suggest that DAP/CPT and VAN/CPT can be considered for complicated MRSA bacteremia when other treatment options fail or are unavailable. We propose persistent bacteremia with incomplete source control to be a clinical niche particularly worthy of further investigation.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), the most common mesenchymal neoplasm of the GI tract and one of the most common sarcomas, is dependent on the expression of the mutated KIT or platelet-derived growth factor receptor in most cases. Imatinib mesylate potently abrogates the effects of KIT signaling by directly binding into the ATP-binding pocket of the kinase. It is becoming increasingly apparent that the binding affinity of imatinib for the receptor is dependent on the type and location of mutation. Within KIT, patients whose tumor has an exon 9 mutation are treated by many clinicians with higher doses of imatinib than those patients with mutations within exon 11. Additionally, there are over 400 unique mutations within exon 11 that may have distinctly different binding affinity for imatinib as well as other kinases. Secondary KIT mutations generally occur at a codon where imatinib binds resulting in KIT reactivation and resistance. Sunitinib malate, a second-generation KIT inhibitor is active in imatinib-resistant disease and is FDA-approved for use in this setting. In this review, we describe the biology of the genes and gene mutations responsible for GIST and discuss known and potential clinical implications.

Although imatinib mesylate has revolutionized the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), resistance and progression almost inevitably develop with long-term monotherapy. To enhance imatinib-induced cytotoxicity and overcome imatinib-resistance in GIST cells, we examined the antitumor effects of the pro-apoptotic Bcl-2/Bcl-x(L) inhibitor ABT-737, alone and in combination with imatinib.We treated imatinib-sensitive, GIST-T1 and GIST882, and imatinib-resistant cells with ABT-737 alone and with imatinib. We determined the anti-proliferative and apoptotic effects by cell viability assay, flow cytometric apoptosis and cell cycle analysis, immunoblotting, and nuclear morphology. Synergism was determined by isobologram analysis.The IC(50) of single-agent ABT-737 at 72 h was 10 μM in imatinib-sensitive GIST-T1 and GIST882 cells, and 1 μM in imatinib-resistant GIST48IM cells. ABT-737 and imatinib combined synergistically in a time- and dose-dependent manner to inhibit the proliferation and induce apoptosis of all GIST cells, as evidenced by cell viability and apoptosis assays, caspase activation, PARP cleavage, and morphologic changes. Isobologram analyses revealed strongly synergistic drug interactions, with combination indices0.5 for most ABT-737/imatinib combinations. Thus, clinically relevant in vitro concentrations of ABT-737 have single-agent antitumor activity and are synergistic in combination with imatinib.We provide the first preclinical evidence that Bcl-2/Bcl-x(L) inhibition with ABT-737 synergistically enhances imatinib-induced cytotoxicity via apoptosis, and that direct engagement of apoptotic cell death may be an effective approach to circumvent imatinib-resistance in GIST.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal tumor of the gastrointestinal tract and is a paradigm of targeted therapy for solid tumors. Elucidation of the biology of GIST enabled use of imatinib, which revolutionized the prognosis of advanced GIST. Whereas surgical resection continues to be the standard of care for primary GIST, judicious and individualized use of adjuvant and neoadjuvant imatinib may enhance the potential for cure in select patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Prospective trials utilizing adjuvant and neoadjuvant imatinib have established the safety and efficacy of these modalities adjunct to surgical resection. Correlative tissue studies derived from these trials have examined gene expression patterns, metabolic and radiographic response, and apoptosis during the first few days of imatinib therapy. As appropriate use of adjuvant and neoadjuvant imatinib requires proper patient selection, development of a predictive nomogram, and advances in mutational analysis represent progress toward individualized care. SUMMARY: Imatinib is well tolerated and beneficial as adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy, but its utility in these settings continues to be refined. The greatest benefit will derive from an individualized approach that considers multiple patient, drug, and tumor characteristics to assess risk and likelihood of benefit for each patient.

Background People with HIV are at for metabolic syndrome (MetS) and fatty liver disease, but the role of Antiretroviral therapy (ART) is poorly understood. MetS and fatty liver disease been associated with changes in adiponectin, soluble ST2 (sST2), chitinase 3-like 1 (Chi3L1), hyaluronic acid (HA), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1), lysyl oxidase-like-2 (LOXL2) and transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) concentrations in HIV-uninfected populations. Protease (PI) and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) may contribute to these comorbidities, but the effects of switching from PI- or NNRTI to raltegravir (RAL) on these biomarkers is unknown. Methods Cryopreserved plasma was obtained from a completed, prospective trial of HIV-infected women with central adiposity on NNRTI- or PI-based ART during which they were randomized to remain on their current ART or switch to a RAL based regimen. Biomarker concentrations were quantified using ELISA and Multiplex assays at baseline and 24 weeks after randomization. Wilcoxon-signed rank test evaluated within-group changes, Spearman and linear regression models evaluated correlations between biomarkers and clinical covariates. Results Participants had a median age of 43 years, CD4+ T lymphocyte count 558 cells/mm3 and BMI 32 kg/m2; 35% met criteria for MetS. At baseline, higher adiponectin levels correlated with higher Chi3L1 levels (r = 0.42, p = 0.02), as did declines after 24 weeks (r = 0.40, p = 0.03). Changes in sST2 correlated with changes in Chi3L1 (r = 0.43, p = 0.02) and adiponectin (r = 0.40, p = 0.03). Adiponectin and Chi3L1 levels decreased significantly in women switched to RAL vs continue PI/NNRTI. Conclusion In women with HIV and central obesity, the hepatic steatosis/fibrosis marker Chi3L1 and adiponectin decrease in conjunction with sST2 decreases following switch to RAL. Whether switching from NNRTI/PI-based regimens to RAL can improve hepatic steatosis and dysmetabolism requires further study. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00656175

Unlike epithelial cancers that are both more homogeneous and easily categorized by their respective tissues of origin (e.g., breast or lung cancer), sarcomas represent a diverse class of molecularly distinct bone and soft-tissue mesenchymal neoplasms of more than 50 subtypes. This diversity, as well as the relative rarity of sarcomas as a whole, has presented challenges in conducting prospective randomized clinical trials to assess the value of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for any given subtype. Most clinical trials and meta-analyses have neglected the phenotypic and molecular heterogeneity differentiating one sarcoma subtype from another in favor of a simplified grouping that ensures timely trial completion. As the success of treating gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) with imatinib demonstrates, a decision to provide neoadjuvant chemotherapy must take into consideration both the subtype being treated and the effect such treatment would be expected to exert upon that subtype.

Purpose: Molecular deregulations underlying epithelioid sarcoma (ES) progression are poorly understood yet critically needed to develop new therapies. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is overexpressed in ES; using preclinical models, we examined the ES EGFR role and assessed anti-ES EGFR blockade effects, alone and with mTOR inhibition. Experimental Design: EGFR and mTOR expression/activation was examined via tissue microarray (n = 27 human ES specimens; immunohistochemistry) and in human ES cell lines (Western blot and quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR). Cell proliferation, survival, migration, and invasion effects of EGFR and mTOR activation treated with erlotinib (anti-EGFR small-molecule inhibitor) alone and combined with rapamycin were assessed in cell culture assays. In vivo growth effects of erlotinib alone or with rapamycin were evaluated using severe combined immunodeficient mouse ES xenograft models. Results: EGFR was expressed and activated in ES specimens and cell lines. EGFR activation increased ES cell proliferation, motility, and invasion and induced cyclin D1, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) 2, and MMP9 expression. EGFR blockade inhibited these processes and caused significant cytostatic ES growth inhibition in vivo. mTOR pathway activation at varying levels was identified in all tissue microarray–evaluable ES tissues; 88% of samples had no or reduced PTEN expression. Similarly, both ES cell lines showed enhanced mTOR activity; VAESBJ cells exhibited constitutive mTOR activation uncoupled from EGFR signaling. Most importantly, combined erlotinib/rapamycin resulted in synergistic anti-ES effects in vitro and induced superior tumor growth inhibition in vivo versus single agent administration. Conclusions: EGFR and mTOR signaling pathways are deregulated in ES. Preclinical ES model–derived insights suggest that combined inhibition of these targets might be beneficial, supporting evaluations in clinical trials. Clin Cancer Res; 17(18); 5901–12. ©2011 AACR.

Although gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) harboring activating KIT or platelet-derived growth factor receptor A ( PDGFRA ) mutations respond to treatment with targeted KIT/PDGFRA inhibitors such as imatinib mesylate, these treatments are rarely curative. Most often, a sizeable tumor cell subpopulation survives and remains quiescent for years, eventually resulting in acquired resistance and treatment failure. Here, we report that imatinib induces autophagy as a survival pathway in quiescent GIST cells. Inhibiting autophagy, using RNAi-mediated silencing of autophagy regulators (ATGs) or antimalarial lysosomotrophic agents, promotes the death of GIST cells both in vitro and in vivo. Thus, combining imatinib with autophagy inhibition represents a potentially valuable strategy to promote GIST cytotoxicity and to diminish both cellular quiescence and acquired resistance in GIST patients.

In the article by Roberts and colleagues ([1][1]), the authors demonstrated that inhibition of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) was required for survival of myeloid cells expressing mutant KIT. Restoration of PP2A activity by FTY720 (fingolimod; Novartis) was cytotoxic to these cells. The U.S. Food and