Search

The use of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents against chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections can result in the successful treatment of nearly all patients. Effective antiviral treatments can prevent the progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular malignancy, and decrease liver-related morbidity and mortality.Paritaprevir-ritonavir-ombitasvir and dasabuvir (PrOD), with or without ribavirin, is an all-oral regimen approved for the treatment of HCV genotype 1 infections, including patients with compensated cirrhosis. Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials demonstrated the safety and efficacy of this regimen in HCV genotype 1-infected patients who are treatment-naïve and those who have failed peginterferon/ribavirin therapy. Additional studies evaluated the use of PrOD with or without ribavirin among special populations, including patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus-1 and HCV, liver transplant recipients with HCV recurrence, and patients with severe renal impairment. Additionally, the combination of paritaprevir-ritonavir-ombitasvir plus ribavirin is found to be highly efficacious, and is now approved in the US, for the treatment of HCV genotype 4 infections.The availability and use of interferon-free DAA combination regimens has resulted in a major paradigm shift in the treatment of HCV. PrOD, with or without ribavirin, is an effective, safe and tolerable treatment option.

Liver transplant recipients are at risk of developing recurrent hepatitis B after liver transplantation for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related liver disease. We evaluated the efficacy of a new hepatitis B prophylaxis regimen involving conversion from at least 12 months of HBIg with lamivudine to combination therapy with an oral nucleoside and nucleotide analog. Between June 2008 and May 2010, a total of 61 liver transplant recipients were converted to a combination of a nucleoside and nucleotide analog. The mean (±standard deviation) follow-up time after conversion was 15.0 (±6.1) months. Recurrent HBV occurred in two (3.3%) patients at 3.1 and 16.6 months after HBIg cessation. The overall person time incidence rate for HBV recurrence after HBIg cessation was 2.7 cases per 100 person-years. The estimate of HBV recurrence was 1.7% at 1 year after HBIg cessation. HBIg cessation a minimum of 12 months after liver transplantation with subsequent combination therapy with a nucleoside and nucleotide analog provides effective prophylaxis against recurrent HBV infection. The clinical implications of HBsAg detection without clinical, biochemical or molecular manifestations of recurrent hepatitis B require further study.

A retrospective chart review of 1065 consecutive liver allograft recipients in 11 centers from January 1997 to September 1998 was performed. Patients were followed for 3 years or until graft loss. Patients received either tacrolimus (n = 594), cyclosporine (n = 450) or no calcineurin inhibitor (n = 21). Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores at time of transplant were similar between the two groups. During follow-up, more patients switched from cyclosporine to tacrolimus (26.7%) than from tacrolimus to cyclosporine (12.8%; p < 0.0001). Patient and graft survival were equivalent. Corticosteroid use was more common in cyclosporine-treated patients (p < 0.00001). Patients receiving tacrolimus experienced lower serum creatinine levels at months 3 through 36 (p < 0.0001). Systolic blood pressure was lower in patients receiving tacrolimus (p < 0.001) despite a reduced requirement for anti-hypertensive agents (p < 0.0001). In addition, tacrolimus was associated with lower total cholesterol and triglyceride levels for months 3 through 24 and 3 through 12, respectively (p < 0.01), despite a reduced requirement for anti-hyperlipidemic agents. The incidence of new-onset diabetes mellitus was similar in both groups. While both calcineurin inhibitors were associated with excellent patient and graft survival, renal function, blood pressure and serum lipid levels were significantly better with tacrolimus treatment.

Recurrent hepatitis B infection after liver transplantation was previously frequent and associated with significant allograft failure and mortality. Recurrence rates of hepatitis B were improved with the use of passive immunoprophylaxis with hepatitis B immune globulin, and later, lamivudine monotherapy. Combination prophylaxis with intravenous hepatitis B immune globulin and lamivudine substantially decreased rates of hepatitis B recurrence, but intravenous administration of hepatitis B immune globulin was expensive and associated with significant adverse effects. In the current study, 59 patients receiving primary liver transplantation for chronic hepatitis B infection were prospectively followed up after converting from intravenous to intramuscular hepatitis B immune globulin in combination with lamivudine. All patients tolerated intramuscular hepatitis B immune globulin well. At a median follow-up of 511 days after conversion to intramuscular hepatitis B immune globulin, 58 of 59 patients (98.3%) were hepatitis B surface antigen-negative. Twenty-one patients (35.6%) required a median of one supplemental intravenous hepatitis B immune globulin infusion to maintain therapeutic antibody levels. Economic analysis showed an average cost-effectiveness ratio for combination intramuscular hepatitis B immune globulin plus lamivudine of $52,600 per recurrence prevented, which was far below the cost of lamivudine monotherapy and of intravenous hepatitis B immune globulin alone or in combination with lamivudine. These results suggest that intramuscular administration of hepatitis B immune globulin in combination with lamivudine offers a safe, effective, and cost-effective approach to preventing hepatitis B recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation.

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection was limited until recently by poor graft and patient outcomes caused by recurrent HBV. Long-term immunoprophylaxis with hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) dramatically improved post-OLT survival, but recurrent HBV still occurred in up to 36% of the recipients. More recently, combination HBIG and lamivudine has been shown to effectively prevent HBV recurrence in patients post-OLT. The aim of the current study is to determine long-term outcome and cost-effectiveness of using combination HBIG and lamivudine compared with HBIG monotherapy in patients who undergo OLT for HBV. A retrospective chart review identified 59 patients administered combination HBIG and lamivudine and 12 patients administered HBIG monotherapy as primary prophylaxis against recurrent HBV. Lamivudine, 150 mg/d, was administered orally indefinitely. HBIG was administered under a standard protocol (10,000 IU intravenously during the anhepatic phase, then 10,000 IU/d intravenously for 7 days, then 10,000 IU intravenously monthly) indefinitely. A decision-analysis model was developed to evaluate the potential economic impact of prophylaxis against HBV with combination therapy compared with monotherapy. Recurrent HBV was defined as the reappearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) after its initial disappearance post-OLT. In the combination-therapy group, no patient redeveloped serum HBsAg or HBV DNA during mean follow-ups of 459 and 416 days, respectively. In the monotherapy group, 3 patients (25%) had reappearance of HBsAg in serum during a mean follow-up of 663 days. Combination therapy resulted in a dominant, cost-effective strategy with an average cost-effectiveness ratio of $252,111/recurrence prevented compared with $362,570/recurrence prevented in the monotherapy strategy. Combination prophylaxis with HBIG and lamivudine is highly effective in preventing recurrent HBV, may protect against the emergence of resistant mutants, and is significantly more cost-effective than HBIG monotherapy with its associated rate of recurrent HBV.

Background. We conducted a trial of long-term ganciclovir prophylaxis for prevention of primary cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in CMV-seronegative liver transplant recipients with CMV-seropositive donors. Methods. Patients received intravenous ganciclovir at a dose of 6 mglkg once a day from day 1 to day 30 after transplant, and then at a dose of 6 mg/kg once a day, Monday through Friday, until day 100. Forty-seven consecutive patients were evaluated. Due to the primary physician's decision or administrative error, 10 patients received less than 7 weeks of ganciclovir (mean duration, 3 weeks). Results. Four of the 10 (40%) patients who received less than 7 weeks of ganciclovir developed CMV disease (hepatitis). In contrast, none of the 37 patients given 100 days of prophylactic ganciclovir developed CMV disease while receiving ganciclovir. Two patients (5.4%) subsequently developed CMV disease (hepatitis) 21 and 88 days, respectively, after completing their ganciclovir prophylaxis. Reversible neutropenia in three patients (8.1%) was the only side effect associated with long-term ganciclovir. Complications from central intravenous catheters did not occur. Conclusions. These results reaffirm the efficacy and safety of long-term ganciclovir prophylaxis for prevention of primary CMV disease in a large number of high-risk CMV-seronegative liver transplant recipients with CMV-seropositive donors.

This study was designed to determine the frequency of hyperlipidemia after orthotopic liver transplantation and whether treatment with a hydroxy-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor was safe and efficacious. Cholesterol levels were assessed in 45 consecutive adult liver transplants (mean +/- SE). Four of 22 patients on cyclosporine (CsA) (18%) and three of 23 patients on FK506 (13%) had levels >225 mg/dl at 12 months (cholesterol levels for patients on CsA [total n=22]: pre-Tx = 140+/-11, 1 month = 183+/-36,3 months = 221+/-12, 6 months = 211+/-11, 12 months = 202+/-14 [P 225 mg/dl, and two additional risk factors for coronary artery disease were started on pravastatin. Ninety-eight patients were enrolled. Sixteen patients (16%) discontinued the drug because of subjective complaints. No episodes of rhabdomyolysis or hepatotoxicity occurred (cholesterol levels for patients on CsA [total n=65]: pretreatment = 251+/-7, 6 months = 220+/-7 [P=0.01 vs. pretreatment], 12 months = 224+/-8 [P=0.01 vs. pretreatment]; FK506 [total n=17]: pretreatment = 251+/-17, 6 months = 219+/-17, 12 months = 208+/-17 [P=0.08 vs. pretreatment]). Natural killer cells isolated from normal volunteers (n=14) exhibited 27+/-9% specific lysis. Patients on FK506 or cyclosporine-based immunosuppression alone (n=11) exhibited 20+/-4% specific lysis. Standard immunosuppression plus pravastatin (n=10) decreased lysis to 0.2+/-10% (P

The effect of ganciclovir prophylaxis on reinfection of hepatic allografts by hepatitis B virus (HBV) was studied in 26 patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for decompensated cirrhosis due to HBV. Patients were randomized to receive either ganciclovir (6 mg/kg/day intravenously for a total of 100 days) or acyclovir (10 mg/kg every 8 hours intravenously until discharged and then 800 mg orally every 6 hours) for a total of 100 days after OLT as part of a study of prophylaxis against cytomegalovirus infection. All patients received hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG), 10,000 units intravenously, during the anhepatic phase, daily for the first 7 days, after OLT, and then every 4 weeks for 6 months, Seven of 12 (58%) patients in the ganciclovir group developed recurrent HBV, compared with 6/14 (46%) of the acyclovir group (nonsignificant). No significant difference was observed in time to recurrent HBV in the ganciclovir group (mean 13.2 months) compared to the acyclovir group (mean 11 months). Our results suggest that ganciclovir administered prophylactically for 100 days after OLT does not prevent or delay graft reinfection by HBV.

A large number of anesthetics, tranquilizers, hypnotic sedatives, and anticonvulsants are used clinically. Although these agents are generally well tolerated, liver injury of differing patterns is well recognized with their use. Knowledge of the likelihood of hepatotoxicity and the characteristic clinical features with these compounds is important as fatal outcomes due to liver failure have been reported with several of these agents. This article describes the potential mechanisms and clinical features of drug hepatotoxicity associated with these compounds.

In patients receiving orthotopic liver transplantation, hepatitis B recurrence rates have decreased significantly with the use of various methods for prophylaxis. At present, a combination of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and lamivudine is the standard of care, resulting in recurrence rates of 0% to 11%. Recent data suggest that the addition of adefovir to lamivudine is successful in treating patients with recurrent hepatitis B infection. A Markov model was used to compare costs and outcomes of 2 strategies for hepatitis B prophylaxis 1 year after transplantation. The first consisted of prophylaxis with lamivudine and adefovir (strategy 1), whereas the second consisted of intramuscular HBIG and lamivudine (strategy 2) with the addition of adefovir in patients who subsequently developed hepatitis B recurrence. Patients who failed with adefovir and lamivudine were then treated with tenofovir and entecavir. 16.8% of liver transplant recipients had hepatitis B recurrence after 10 years of treatment with lamivudine and HBIG. The medical costs for strategy 1 and strategy 2 after 10 years of therapy were $151,819 and $166,246, respectively, and this resulted in cost savings of $14,427. The decision analysis model began 1 year after liver transplantation. A 1-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the model was most sensitive to cost changes of adefovir and HBIG injections as well as variations in the hepatitis B virus recurrence rate. The model was robust to costs of lamivudine, laboratory costs, administrative fees, and office visit fees. Our decision analysis model resulted in marked savings in costs with strategy 1 (lamivudine and adefovir), providing pharmacoeconomic support for the use of this strategy as first-line therapy in hepatitis B prophylaxis in liver transplant recipients 1 year after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 15:413–420, 2009. © 2009 AASLD.

A roundtable meeting to discuss the use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to guide immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil was held in New York in December 2004. Existing recommendations for the initial months after transplantation were updated. After ensuring adequate levels of mycophenolic acid (MPA, the active metabolite of mycophenolate mofetil) immediately after transplantation, optimal efficacy may require only a few dose adjustments, because intrapatient variability in exposure seems low. Recommendations based on current knowledge were made for posttransplantation sampling time points and for target MPA concentrations. Algorithms for estimating MPA exposure using limited sampling strategies were presented, and a new assay for MPA discussed. It was agreed that because of interpatient variability and the influence of concomitant immunosuppressants, TDM might help optimize outcomes, especially in patients at higher risk of rejection. The value of TDM in the general transplant population will be assessed from large, ongoing, randomized studies.

OBJECTIVE:To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, adverse effects, and economic issues associated with sirolimus, the most recent immunosuppressive agent approved for kidney transplantation.DATA SOURCES:A MEDLINE search (1966–June 2000) was completed to identify primary and review articles. In addition, abstracts from recent meetings on transplantation were reviewed for information and research on sirolimus.STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION:Blinded, randomized, controlled studies were the goal, but, as with most newly approved immunosuppressive agents, a significant amount of information on sirolimus is not available in this optimal form. All articles were assessed and all pertinent information was incorporated in this review.DATA SYNTHESIS:Sirolimus is structurally related to the immunosuppressive agent tacrolimus, and retains a pharmacokinetic and drug interaction profile similar to that of the calcineurin inhibitors, cyclosporine and tacrolimus. However, the novel mechanism of action of sirolimus differs significantly from these agents, as does its adverse effect profile. The most significant adverse reaction is hyperlipidemia. Clinical experience with sirolimus has allowed transplant centers to expand its use into other areas of transplantation as well as certain autoimmune disorders.CONCLUSIONS:The definitive role of sirolimus will continue to be determined; however, sirolimus offers an excellent addition to the transplant immunosuppression armamentarium.

Recurrent hepatitis B infection after orthotopic liver transplantation remains problematic despite prophylaxis with hepatitis B immune globulin (anti-HBs IgG). Recently, famciclovir (an oral nucleoside analog) has been shown to have potent antiviral activity against hepatitis B in vitro as well as in patients with chronic hepatitis B. We present two patients who developed recurrent hepatitis B after orthotopic liver transplantation and were treated with famciclovir, 500 mg t.i.d. Both patients subsequently responded with marked improvement in biochemical liver tests and histology, with subsequent loss of hepatitis B surface antigen. Famciclovir is a useful agent in the treatment of hepatitis B in the liver transplant recipient.

Patients undergoing liver transplantation for hepatitis B-related liver disease are prone to recurrence. The mainstay of prophylaxis has been passive immunotherapy with hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG). Antiviral therapy with lamivudine has proven effective in lowering hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA and improving histology in patients with hepatitis B infection; its role in prophylaxis against hepatitis B recurrence following liver transplantation is under investigation. Viral breakthrough and resistance, however, are a significant problem with monotherapy with either HBIG or lamivudine. The efficacy of combination lamivudine/HBIG prophylaxis has not been reported. Fourteen patients underwent transplantation for decompensated liver disease owing to hepatitis B. Lamivudine (150 mg p.o./d) was begun before transplantation in 10 patients, including 4 who were HBV DNA-positive. In addition, 1 patient was HBV DNA-positive when transplanted. HBIG was given perioperatively and continued thereafter; treatment with lamivudine was maintained or initiated at the time of transplantation and continued indefinitely. The median follow-up was 387 days. Actuarial 1-year patient and graft survival was 93% (1 patient died of unrelated causes). At a median interval of 28 days following lamivudine treatment, all 5 HBV DNA-positive patients cleared HBV DNA from the serum; 1 went on to clear hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), before transplantation, at day 148 of lamivudine treatment. By the highly sensitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR), at a median of 346 days (range, 130-525 days) following transplantation, all 13 surviving patients had no detectable serum HBV DNA. Lamivudine suppresses HBV replication in patients awaiting liver transplantation. At a median follow-up of 1.1 years, combination prophylaxis with lamivudine and HBIG prevented hepatitis B recurrence following liver transplantation.

Eight (0.59%) of 1,347 patients who underwent liver transplantation at the UCLA Medical Center (Los Angeles) developed coccidioidomycosis. Whereas only one case occurred during the first 8 years and 10 months of the UCLA Liver Transplant Program (February 1984 to December 1992), seven cases occurred within the following 23-month period (December 1992 to November 1994). The median time of onset for infection after transplantation was 8 weeks (range, 4-312 weeks). Clinical presentations of patients with coccidioidomycosis included pneumonia (six cases), pneumonia with meningitis (one case), hepatitis (one case), and monoarticular arthritis (one case). Despite therapy with amphotericin B alone (six cases) or amphotericin B plus fluconazole (two cases), infection was fatal in four of eight cases. As of this writing, the four surviving patients are receiving chronic maintenance therapy with either fluconazole (three patients) or itraconazole (one patient). These experiences show that coccidioidomycosis can be a serious and frequently fatal infection after liver transplantation and that the incidence of this disease appears to be increasing.

Introduction: Long-term immunoprophylaxis with HBIG monotherapy reduces HBV recurrence in OLT patients, although the IV form has a number of limitations including expense and a HBV recurrence rate of approximately 20%. Combination prophylaxis with HBIG and lamivudine reduces recurrence rates further although the disadvantages of IV HBIG remain. The cost of IV HBIG has become prohibitive and thus we now report the use of 1M HBIG in maintaining adequate HBsAb titers. Methods: This was a retrospective study evaluating 49 patients transplanted between 6/93 and 8/99. Patients were treated with lamivudine, 150 mg po qd, and HBIG, 10,000 ru IV, in standard protocol (one dose intraoperatively, qd for six days, and then qmo indefinately) and then changed to 1M given as 5 ml qmo. HBsAb, HBsAg, and HBV DNA were checked monthly. Patients were changed back to IV if HBsAb levels dropped below 100 IV. All patients were continued on lamivudine. Two patients died of unrelated causes. Mean follow-up for the remaining 47 patients was 200 days (range, 40 to 353). Results: 38147 (81%) patients treated with 1M HBIG were able to maintain adequate HBsAb titers. Nine patients (19%) required intermittent IV administration for low titers or poor tolerance. No patients had recurrence of HBsAg or HBV DNA. Conclusions: 81% of patients tolerated conversion to 1M administration of HBIG with adequate HBsAb titers and without recurrence of HBV. The potential cost savings and ease of administration make 1M HBIG a viable alternative in OLT patients, Longterm follow up will determine whether 1M HBIG provides durable protection against HBV recurrence, although our initial experience suggests that excellent protection against HBV recurrence is possible. 1155