Search

We performed a post hoc analysis of the Belimumab International Study in Lupus Nephritis (BLISS-LN), a Phase 3, multinational, double-blind, 104-week trial, in which 448 patients with lupus nephritis were randomized to receive intravenous belimumab 10 mg/kg or placebo with standard therapy (cyclophosphamide/azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil). Add-on belimumab was found to be most effective in improving the primary efficacy kidney response and complete kidney response in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis and a baseline urine protein/creatinine ratio under 3 g/g. However, there was no observed improvement in the kidney response with belimumab treatment in patients with lupus nephritis and sub-epithelial deposits or with a baseline protein/creatinine ratio of 3 g/g or more. Belimumab significantly reduced the risk of kidney-related events or death and lupus nephritis flare in the overall population. Belimumab reduced the risk of a sustained 30% or 40% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) versus standard treatment alone and attenuated the annual rate of eGFR decline in patients who remained on-study. Thus, our data suggest that the addition of belimumab to standard therapy could attenuate the risk of lupus nephritis flare and eGFR decline in a broad spectrum of patients with lupus nephritis.

To understand the epidemiology, current treatment, and disease burden of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in the Asia Pacific (APAC) region.A targeted literature review of published evidence on SLE in the APAC region was conducted, using the Medline database (2008-2018), conference proceedings, and other supplementary sources.The current review identified 70 studies conducted in China (n = 15), Japan (n = 13), Taiwan (n = 12), Korea (n = 9), Australia (n = 7), Hong Kong (n = 6), Singapore (n = 4), and multiple places within the APAC region (n = 4). Incidence rates (per 100,000 persons per year) ranged from 0.9-8.4, while prevalence rates ranged from 3.7-127 (per 100,000 persons); however, recent data were limited. Asian patients with SLE were reported to have higher disease severity, disease activity (higher SLE disease activity index scores), and organ damage accrual, along with increased morbidity, mortality, and susceptibility to renal involvement compared with other ethnicities in the APAC region. The risk of developing SLE is higher in the Asian population. Routinely used SLE therapies included belimumab, hydroxychloroquine, cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and glucocorticoids; however, prescribing patterns varied across the region. Increased disease activity was associated with high economic burden and poor quality of life for SLE patients in the APAC region.SLE remains a disease with a significant unmet medical need for an innovative therapy that is well-tolerated and effective for patients in the APAC region. Further evidence is required to better characterize the disease and fully capture the burden and impact of SLE in the APAC region. This review has highlighted where there is a paucity of data from patients across the APAC region.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multiorgan autoimmune disorder with a prominent genetic component. Evidence has shown that individuals of non-European ancestry experience the disease more severely, exhibiting an increased incidence of cardiovascular disease, renal involvement, and tissue damage compared with European ancestry populations. Furthermore, there seems to be variability in the response of individuals within different ancestral groups to standard medications, including cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate, rituximab, and belimumab. Although the widespread application of candidate gene, Immunochip, and genome-wide association studies has contributed to our understanding of the link between genetic variation (typically single nucleotide polymorphisms) and SLE, despite decades of research it is still unclear why ancestry remains a key determinant of poorer outcome in non-European-ancestry patients with SLE. Here, we will discuss the impact of ancestry on SLE disease burden in patients from diverse backgrounds and highlight how research efforts using novel bioinformatic and pathway-based approaches have begun to disentangle the complex genetic architecture linking ancestry to SLE susceptibility. Finally, we will illustrate how genomic and gene expression analyses can be combined to help identify novel molecular pathways and drug candidates that might uniquely impact SLE among different ancestral populations.

Objective Enrollment of patients of Black African ancestry with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in Phase 2 and 3 belimumab trials was not reflective of the racial distribution observed in the lupus population. This study assessed efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) belimumab plus standard therapy in patients of self-identified black race. Methods EMBRACE (GSK Study BEL115471; NCT01632241): 52-week multicenter, double-blind (DB), placebo-controlled trial in adults of self-identified black race with active SLE, receiving monthly belimumab 10 mg/kg IV, or placebo, plus standard therapy. The optional 26-week open-label extension phase included patients who completed the DB phase. The primary endpoint was SLE Responder Index response rate at Week 52 with modified proteinuria scoring adapted from the SLEDAI-2K (SRI-S2K). Key secondary endpoints included: Week 52 SRI response rate, time to first severe flare, and reductions in prednisone dose. Results The modified intention-to-treat population comprised 448 patients (96.9% female; mean [standard deviation] age: 38.8 [11.42] years). The primary endpoint (SRI-S2K response rate at Week 52) was not achieved (belimumab 48.7%, placebo 41.6%; p=0.1068); however, numerical improvements favoring belimumab were observed, especially in patients with high baseline disease activity or renal manifestations. The safety profile of belimumab was generally consistent with previous SLE trials. Adverse events were the primary reason for DB phase withdrawals (belimumab 5.4%; placebo 6.7%). Conclusions The primary endpoint of this study was not achieved, but improvement with belimumab versus placebo was observed, suggesting that belimumab remains a suitable treatment option for SLE management in patients of Black African ancestry.

BACKGROUND B-cell depletion with rituximab is commonly used for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) that is refractory to conventional therapy, but it yields variable responses. We hypothesized that high B-cell activating factor (BAFF) levels after rituximab can cause disease flares, thereby limiting its effectiveness. OBJECTIVE To obtain preliminary evidence for efficacy of the anti-BAFF therapeutic belimumab after rituximab in SLE. DESIGN Phase 2, randomized, double-blind (patients, assessors, researchers, care providers), placebo-controlled, parallel-group, superiority trial. (ISRCTN: 47873003). SETTING England. PARTICIPANTS Fifty-two patients who had SLE that was refractory to conventional treatment and whose physicians had recommended rituximab therapy were recruited between 2 February 2017 and 28 March 2019. INTERVENTION Participants were treated with rituximab and 4 to 8 weeks later were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous belimumab or placebo for 52 weeks. MEASUREMENTS The prespecified primary end point was serum IgG anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibody levels at 52 weeks. Secondary outcomes included incidence of disease flares and adverse events. RESULTS At 52 weeks, IgG anti-dsDNA antibody levels were lower in patients treated with belimumab compared with placebo (geometric mean, 47 [95% CI, 25 to 88] vs. 103 [CI, 49 to 213] IU/mL; 70% greater reduction from baseline [CI, 46% to 84%]; P < 0.001). Belimumab reduced risk for severe flare (BILAG-2004 grade A) compared with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.27 [CI, 0.07 to 0.98]; log-rank P = 0.033), with 10 severe flares in the placebo group and 3 in the belimumab group. Belimumab did not increase incidence of serious adverse events. Belimumab significantly suppressed B-cell repopulation compared with placebo (geometric mean, 0.012 [CI, 0.006 to 0.014] vs. 0.037 [CI, 0.021 to 0.081] × 109/L) at 52 weeks in a subset of patients (n = 25) with available data. LIMITATIONS Small sample size; biomarker primary end point. CONCLUSION Belimumab after rituximab significantly reduced serum IgG anti-dsDNA antibody levels and reduced risk for severe flare in patients with SLE that was refractory to conventional therapy. The results suggest that this combination could be developed as a therapeutic strategy. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE Versus Arthritis.

Background Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune multisystemic disease with a wide variety of clinical manifestations. One of its symptoms, associated to high morbidity, is serositis. Its prevalence ranges between 11% and 54%, and little is known about factors associated to this manifestation. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of serositis in SLE patients visited at the outpatient Lupus Unit of the Hospital del Mar and identify risk factors that can be used as predictors of this manifestation. Methods A retrospective case-control study was performed based on the review of 297 medical records of SLE patients. Twenty-eight patients were identified to have suffered serositis (cases) and were age- and sex-matched with 2 controls with SLE without serositis. Results The overall prevalence of serositis in our cohort was 9.42%, being higher in men than in women, 30% versus 7.9% ( p = 0.001, 95% CI: 1.7–42.4%). In 40.7%, it was the first manifestation of the disease. When looking for serositis-associated factors, an association was found with anti-dsDNA antibodies measured by the Crithidia method ( p = 0.016), and different measures of corticosteroids, where cases had required higher maximum doses and more pulses than controls throughout the disease, although this last correlation was lost when adjusting for confounding variables as nephritis and arthritis. Cases also received more mycophenolic acid ( p = 0.021) and, marginally, more belimumab ( p = 0.056). Conclusion The overall prevalence of serositis was 9.42%, being significantly higher in men (30%). Therefore, male gender constitutes a risk factor for serositis, and almost one third of men will develop this manifestation, so greater awareness is required in SLE men. CrithidiaDNA+ was also identified as a risk factor, and it should be determined in all SLE patients. Cases significantly received more corticosteroid pulses and higher maximum doses in relation to other SLE severe manifestations, which could imply a more aggressive form of SLE in patients with serositis.

DISCLOSURES: Funding for this summary was contributed by Arnold Ventures, California Health Care Foundation, The Donaghue Foundation, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, and Kaiser Foundation Health Plan ...

Objective To investigate the neonatal and maternal outcomes of patients treated with belimumab during pregnancy. Materials and methods We retrospectively collected patients who were treated with belimumab during pregnancy from January 2018 to October 2020 in a tertiary referral hospital in Taiwan. All patients had clinical and serological features of systemic lupus erythematosus or antiphospholipid syndrome and had been treated accordingly. The patients’ medical and obstetric history, obstetric complications and fetal outcomes were collected by chart review. Results A total of 13 pregnancies in 13 patients were included. The median age was 38 years (interquartile range 32–41 years), 46.2% had a history of recurrent pregnancy loss, and the median number of treatment courses with belimumab (400 mg per dose) was two. There were 11 live births (84.6%, 11 of 13). One episode of omphalitis was noted in one fetus, who recovered well with antibiotic treatment. No fetus had leukopenia, lymphopenia, neutropenia, or thrombocytopenia in the days after birth. No fetal anomalies were found in this series. Among the six patients with a past history of recurrent pregnancy loss, four had live births. Conclusion This study provides new evidence for the use of belimumab in pregnant patients. No increase in the risk of fetal anomalies or severe infection was noted in the patients who were exposed to belimumab during pregnancy. Cautious monitoring is necessary if belimumab is used in pregnant patients, and more data are still needed to validate its safety.

Background and Objective Intravenous (IV) belimumab is the first treatment approved for children ≥5 years of age with active autoantibody-positive systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in the USA, Europe, and Japan. Pharmacokinetic data for belimumab were collected from several clinical trials in Chinese and non-Chinese adults and non-Chinese pediatric patients with SLE. This study aimed to predict the belimumab dose-exposure relationship to Chinese pediatric patients with SLE, as part of the belimumab registration process for this population in China, using a population PK modeling approach. Methods An initial linear two-compartment population pharmacokinetic model was built using data from adults only, and considering and adjusting for the covariates age, body weight, body mass index, fat-free mass, race, baseline albumin and immunoglobulin G levels. The model was used to study possible ethnic differences between Chinese and non-Chinese adults and to predict pediatric pharmacokinetic data in a study of non-Chinese pediatric patients (PLUTO study; NCT01649765). The predicted data were compared with the observed data from PLUTO. The model was then updated with pediatric data from PLUTO to predict steady-state belimumab exposure in Chinese pediatric patients with SLE receiving belimumab 10 mg/kg IV every 4 weeks. Results The dataset comprised 9650 sampled concentration values from 1783 patients. The pharmacokinetics of belimumab were adequately described by the final model using all adult and pediatric data with the estimated typical clearance of 238 ml/day in adult and pediatric patients and steady-state volume of distribution of 4915 ml in adults. Between-patient variability was modest (coefficients of variation: 26.1% for clearance; 8.9% and 28.5%, respectively, for volumes of distribution of the central and peripheral compartments). Six covariates were identified that influenced pharmacokinetics: age, fat-free mass, an indicator of North East Asian race, baseline albumin, immunoglobulin G, and an early study indicator (two early phase I and phase II belimumab studies: LBSL01 and LBSL02). The analysis showed no apparent difference in steady-state exposure between Chinese and non-Chinese populations and between pediatric and adult populations receiving belimumab 10 mg/kg IV. Conclusions In Chinese pediatric patients with SLE, belimumab 10 mg/kg IV every 4 weeks is expected to have exposure similar to that in Chinese adults and non-Chinese pediatric patients with SLE, supporting the use of this regimen in Chinese pediatric patients with SLE. Clinical Trial Registration Numbers NCT01649765, NCT00657007, NCT00071487, NCT01345253, NCT01516450, NCT00410384, NCT00424476, NCT02880852, NCT01583530. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40268-021-00363-2.

Развитие рефрактерного волчаночного нефрита (ВН) указывает на неадекватный ответ на терапию, подразумевая сохранение или ухудшение активности заболевания, несмотря на проводимое лечение. Однако дефиниция ВН неоднозначна, учитывая отсутствие четких параметров ответа: исследования протеинурии и функции почек не дают четкого различия между активностью и необратимым повреждением. Понимание причин рефрактерного заболевания и разработка стратегий лечения очень важны, так как у таких пациентов прогнозы крайне неблагоприятны, в виде развития терминальной стадии почечной недостаточности. В этом обзоре рассмотрена современная концепция рефрактерного ВН и обобщены подходы к лечению, которые использовались в обсервационных когортных исследованиях и серии случаев. Мы подчеркиваем важность оптимизации приверженности пациентов к лечению и соблюдению ими иммуносупрессивных и дополнительных терапевтических стратегий, а также избежание диагностической задержки. Варианты лечения включают повышение дозы глюкокортикоидов, переключение между циклофосфамидом и мофетилом микофенолатом или добавление ритуксимаба, который потенциально может сочетаться с белимумабом. Меньше доказательств подтверждает эффективность экстракорпоральных методов лечения (плазмаферез или иммуноадсорбция), ингибиторов кальциневрина (циклоспорин А или такролимус), внутривенного иммуноглобулина и трансплантации стволовых клеток в лечении ВН. Улучшения в понимании того, что такое рефрактерный ВН, могут быть интегрированы в пути лечения и улучшить исходы ВН.

Currently, strong evidence has been obtained for the fundamental role of pathological activation of B cells in the pathogenesis of immunoinflammatory (autoimmune) rheumatic diseases (IMRD), and drugs that specifically modulate the function or cause depletion of various subpopulations of B cells and plasma cells are considered a promising direction. pharmacotherapy of these diseases. of particular interest is belimumab (BLM), a human monoclonal antibody (mAb) (IgG1λ) to BAFF (B cell-activating factor belonging to the TNF family), which is the first “targeted” biological drug specially developed for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The efficacy and safety of BLM in SLE in adults and children, including lupus nephritis, in combination therapy with rituximab, steroid-sparing effect, the ability to prevent irreversible damage to internal organs dictate the need for its wider application in clinical practice.

Over the past 50 years the survival rate of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) significantly improved, however, it is necessary to develop a new generation of drugs for the treatment of lupus nephritis (LN), the development of which is one of the main factors of high mortality risk in at least 50% of SLE patients. The international clinical trial BLISS-LN has demonstrated a high rate of achievement and maintenance of renal response (RR), confirmed by a higher rate of achievement of RR primary efficacy and complete renal response when using belimumab (BLM) in addition to standard therapy (ST) compared to ST alone in patients with LN. When using BLM, there was a statistically significant reduction in the risk of developing adverse renal events (in particular, deterioration of renal function) or death within 104 weeks compared with placebo. Improvement in LN outcomes was achieved in the setting of long-term reduction in glucocorticoids use after the induction phase. With BLM therapy, there was also a decrease in the total activity of SLE, a decrease in the number of severe exacerbations, and an improvement in serological markers. The benefit/risk ratio of BLM in combination with ST for LN treatment was favorable. BLM can be recommended for LN therapy in combination with standard treatment methods in order to achieve and maintain remission.

Intractable headache, one of the manifestations of neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), is difficult to diagnose and decide on an appropriate treatment. In addition to conventional therapy based on the type of headache, the treatment should be conducted considering the disease activity of SLE rather than the headache. We report two patients with intractable headache who were successfully treated using belimumab therapy. The headaches in both patients were relieved after 2 weeks of belimumab administration. The neutralisation of B lymphocyte stimulator and reduced production of cytokines from B lymphocytes might contribute to the early effects. The potential benefits of using belimumab as an additional immunosuppressant for treating intractable headache complicated with SLE have been discussed.

Effectiveness of rituximab in pediatric idiopathic nephrotic syndrome suggests that B cells play a pathogenic role. We tested safety and efficacy of the B-cell-modulating agent belimumab in frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome (FRNS). An open-label, prospective, single-arm pilot study (EUDRACT 2017-003839-11) was designed to treat 10 children with FRNS with i.v. belimumab for 12 months. Prednisone was tapered/stopped. Safety, number of relapses, cumulative prednisone dose and B-cell subset "levels" are referred to both B cell subset and immunoglobulin. Five patients were enrolled, and four reached the primary 6-month endpoint. Of these, two completed the 12-month endpoint. Three patients experienced ≥2 relapses while on belimumab, requiring additional immunosuppression. Compared to the 6 months before belimumab treatment, the mean number of relapses (1.4 vs. 2, p=0.21) and the mean cumulative prednisone dose (1.86 vs. 2.62 g/m2, p=0.17) were not significantly reduced during the 6 months on belimumab. This study was terminated by the steering committee after the interim evaluation because belimumab failed to show clear benefits to counterbalance the inconvenience of monthly i.v. infusion. During follow-up, total and mature-naive B cells decreased, while no change in memory B-cells was observed. Serum immunoglobulins remained stable. No infusion reaction was observed. Short-term treatment with belimumab in pediatric FRNS was well tolerated. The number of patients was too small to draw conclusions on efficacy. Nonetheless, we did not observe clear improvements. The burden of monthly in-hospital i.v. infusions outweighed potential benefits. Persistence of circulating memory B cells supports their pathogenic role in the disease. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

B cell activating factor (BAFF or BLyS), an important cytokine for B cell survival and humoral immune responses, is targeted in the clinic for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus. This review focuses on the structure, function and inhibition profiles of membrane-bound BAFF, soluble BAFF 3-mer and soluble BAFF 60-mer, all of which have distinct properties. BAFF contains a loop region not required for receptor binding but essential for receptor activation via promotion of BAFF-to-BAFF contacts. This loop region additionally allows formation of BAFF 60-mer, in which epitopes of the BAFF inhibitor belimumab are inaccessible. If 60-mer forms in humans, it is predicted to be short-lived and to act locally because adult serum contains a BAFF 60-mer dissociating activity. Cord blood contains elevated levels of BAFF, part of which displays attributes of 60-mer, suggesting a role for this form of BAFF in the development of foetal or neonate B cells.

B cells exert a prominent contribution to the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Here, we review the immune mechanisms underlying autoreactive B cell activation in SLE, focusing on how B cell receptor and Toll-like receptor signals integrate to drive breaks in tolerance to nuclear antigens. In addition, we discuss autoantibody-dependent and autoantibody-independent B cell effector functions during lupus pathogenesis. Finally, we address efforts to target B cells therapeutically in human SLE. Despite initial disappointing clinical trials testing B cell depletion in lupus, more recent studies show promise, emphasizing how greater understanding of underlying immune mechanisms can yield clinical benefits.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune inflammatory disease affecting both adults and children. Belimumab is the only biologic approved for SLE, and the first in a class of drugs known as B-lymphocyte stimulator-specific inhibitors. The introduction of intravenous belimumab in 2011 was a major advance, being the first new therapy approved for SLE in over 50 years. As of April 2021, more than 7200 people with SLE have received belimumab in clinical studies, and it is approved in over 75 countries for the treatment of adults with SLE. A subcutaneous, self-injectable belimumab formulation was licensed in 2017 by both the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA). Belimumab was then approved for use in children in Europe, the USA and Japan in 2019, and China and Brazil in 2020. Recently, belimumab became the first FDA-approved drug for the treatment of adults with active lupus nephritis (LN), the most-common severe manifestation of SLE. Over the past 10 years, belimumab has established its position as a disease modifier in the SLE treatment paradigms. Robust evidence from randomised clinical studies and observational, real-world studies has demonstrated the tolerability and efficacy of belimumab for reducing disease activity and the risk of new, severe SLE flares. This enables patients to taper their glucocorticoid use, which limits damage accumulation. Significantly more patients with active LN met the criteria for renal responses and were at less risk of a renal-related event or death after receiving belimumab plus standard therapy, compared with standard therapy on top of mandatory steroid reduction. Ongoing clinical studies are evaluating belimumab’s effectiveness in various indications beyond SLE. Post-marketing and registry studies are gathering additional data on key areas such as pregnancy outcomes after belimumab exposure and belimumab co-administration with other biologics.

Objectives To provide information on systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients’ experiences, satisfaction, and expectations with treatments and examine the association between treatment satisfaction and patient-reported outcomes (PRO). Methods A cross-sectional, non-interventional, online survey of US adult patients with SLE was conducted in 2019. The survey consisted of 104 questions about SLE and the following PRO instruments: LupusPRO™, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI), an 11-point Worst Pain Numerical Rating scale (NRS), and an 11-point Worst Joint Pain NRS. Results Five hundred participants (75% female, 76% White/Caucasian, mean age 42.6 ± 12.7 years, 63% with an associate degree or higher) completed the survey. Most participants were “completely” or “somewhat satisfied” with their treatments, although satisfaction rates were lower for corticosteroids (65%), immunosuppressants (71%), and anti-malarials (55%) than for belimumab (intravenous or subcutaneous) (86%) and rituximab (94%). Treatments were more often considered “burdensome” or “very burdensome” for belimumab (67%) and rituximab (63%) than for corticosteroids (48%), immunosuppressants (49%), and anti-malarials (30%). Pain and productivity assessments supported substantial impairment for the majority of participants, even those who indicated that they were completely satisfied with treatments. The treatment goals most commonly reported as “very important” were reducing fatigue, pain, and the frequency or severity of flares. Three-quarters of participants (76.6%) indicated that their physician’s goals for their therapy matched their own goals “very” or “somewhat closely.” Despite high levels of satisfaction, most participants (63.0%) indicated that their physicians had not asked about their treatment goals during the past 3 months. Conclusion SLE patients reported high rates of satisfaction with current therapies despite identifying substantial treatment burdens, residual pain, and fatigue. Reduced fatigue, pain, and flares were the most important treatment goals for these patients.

New molecular mechanisms that can be targeted with specific drugs have recently emerged for the treatment of systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients. Over the past 3 years, the achievement of one large phase 3 trial has led to the approval by drug agencies of the first drug licenced for SSc-related interstitial lung disease. Given this exciting time in the SSc field, we aimed to perform a systemic literature review of phase 1, phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials and large observational studies about targeted therapies in SSc. We searched MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov for clinical studies from 2016 with targeted therapies as the primary treatment in patients with SSc for skin or lung involvement as the primary clinical outcome measure. Details on the study characteristics, the trial drug used, the molecular target engaged by the trial drug, the inclusion criteria of the study, the treatment dose, the possibility of concomitant immunosuppression, the endpoints of the study, the duration of the study and the results obtained were reviewed. Of the 973 references identified, 21 (4 conference abstracts and 17 articles) were included in the systematic review. A total of 15 phase 1/phase 2 clinical trials, 2 phase 3 clinical trials and 2 observation studies were analysed. The drugs studied in phase 1/phase 2 studies included the following: inebilizumab, dabigatran, C-82, pomalidomide, rilonacept, romilkimab, tocilizumab, tofacitinib, pirfenidone, lenabasum, abatacept, belimumab, riociguat, SAR100842 and lanifibranor. All but 3 studies were performed in early diffuse SSc patients with different inclusion criteria, while 3 studies were performed in SSc patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). Phase 3 clinical trials investigated nintedanib and tocilizumab. Nintedanib was investigated in SSc-ILD patients whereas tocilizumab focused on early diffuse SSc patients with inflammatory features. Two observational studies including > 50 patients with rituximab as the targeted drug were also evaluated. All these studies offer a real hope for SSc patients. The future challenges will be to customize patient-specific therapeutics with the goal to develop precision medicine for SSc.

Objective: to study the safety and efficacy of the 23-valent polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine (PPV-23) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).Patients and methods. The study included 75 patients with definite diagnosis of SLE at the age of 19–68 years, 10 (13%) of them had high SLE activity, 18 (24%) – moderate, 42 (56%) – low, in 5 (7%) patients the disease was in remission. PPV-23 was injected subcutaneously in a single dose of 0.5 ml. In 60 patients the follow-up period was ≥12 months, in 15 – from 2 to 6 months. Patients were examined before and 1, 3 and 12 months after immunization.Results and discussion. In 38 (50.7%) patients, standard local vaccination reactions of mild and moderate severity were noted, in 1 (1.3%) – a general reaction of mild severity, in 2 (2.7%) – mild diarrhea during 1 day, in 1 (1.3%) – a hyperergic reaction of the Artyus phenomenon type, the symptoms were relieved within 7 days. During 12 months of follow-up, neither exacerbations of SLE, reliably associated with vaccination, nor new autoimmune phenomena, were detected. After 1 year of observation, the number of responders to vaccination was 58%, non-responders – 42%. The duration and activity of the disease, age over 50 years, glucocorticoid therapy > 10 mg per day, did not significantly affect the vaccine response. There was a decrease in the immune response in patients on biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) therapy compared to patients without such treatment (43 and 68% of cases, respectively), p=0.058. There was no difference between rituximab and belimumab treated subjects. There was a tendency for the prevalence of vaccination responses among patients, who received bDMARDs Conclusion. Sufficient immunogenicity, good tolerability and clinical efficacy of PPV-23 in patients with SLE, including those who received combined immunosuppressive therapy, have been shown. The use of bDMARDs reduces the number of patients with a vaccine response. The number of responders to vaccination increases when immunization is carried out before the initiation of therapy with bDMARDs or when this therapy is initiated

Belimumab is generally well tolerated; however, several adverse events have been associated with the use of belimumab including infections, haematotoxicity, malignancies, infusion reactions, and psychiatric disorders. The purpose of the review is to appraise the adverse events associated with belimumab therapy in SLE which would then aid clinicians in making informed decisions regarding belimumab therapy in SLE patients. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disorder affecting multiple organs with high morbidity and mortality rates. Existing treatment options for SLE include chloroquine, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, corticosteroids, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Belimumab is the first-ever targeted biologic product for the treatment of autoantibody-positive SLE patients who are on standard therapy. Belimumab is a monoclonal antibody that can effectively reduce SLE disease activity and disease flares by targeting the soluble form of B lymphocyte stimulators. Belimumab can decrease the production of autoantibodies and B cell survival. Belimumab therapy has a low incidence of adverse events and a favourable safety profile. Therefore, due to the effectiveness of belimumab in SLE, belimumab is recommended for SLE patients in addition to standard therapy.

Background: In patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), disease activity can persist even after initiating dialysis. However, guidelines for the treatment of patients with SLE after dialysis is initiated have not yet been established. Case Presentation: We describe the case of a 54-year-old Japanese woman who was diagnosed with SLE at age 12, progressed to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and initiated hemodialysis for lupus nephritis. However, SLE activity persisted after hemodialysis. Cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil were administered in addition to prednisolone and immunoadsorption, but this treatment strategy was limited by side effects. The patient was subsequently treated with belimumab, and the activity of SLE decreased rapidly. Conclusions: ESRD patients with SLE show no significant decrease in transitional B cells and have elevated levels of B-cell activating factor (BAFF). Both transitional B cells and BAFF are important therapeutic targets for belimumab, indicating that patients with ESRD may benefit from belimumab therapy. However, the effects of belimumab may be potentiated in patients with uremia, who may be more susceptible to adverse events such as infections. Patients with SLE who receive belimumab after initiation of hemodialysis therefore require careful follow-up. Here, we report the first case of belimumab administration in a patient with SLE after initiation of hemodialysis.

Die Therapie des systemischen Lupus erythematodes (SLE) und des primaren Sjogren-Syndroms (pSS) stellt eine Herausforderung dar. Dies liegt nicht nur an der Heterogenitat der Auspragung beider Erkrankungen, sondern auch an den wenigen erprobten und zugelassenen Therapiemoglichkeiten. Fur die Behandlung des SLE zugelassen sind Hydroxychloroquin, Azathioprin, Belimumab und, zur Therapie der schweren Lupus-Nephritis, Cyclophosphamid; durch den gemeinsamen Bundesausschuss wurde zudem Mycophenolat-Mofetil zur Behandlung der Lupus-Nephritis genehmigt, wahrend das bewahrte Medikament Methotrexat zwar nicht zugelassen ist, jedoch standardmasig verwendet wird. Fur das pSS gibt es wenige zugelassene Optionen zur Therapie der glandularen Beteiligung. Die Behandlung extraglandularer, systemischer Manifestationen richtet sich nach dem Organbefall. Hierfur existieren keine zugelassenen Therapieoptionen und wir bewegen uns stets im Off-Label-Bereich. Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit ist es, die moglichen Therapieoptionen des SLE und pSS zu erlautern und ihren Stellenwert in der Behandlung einzelner Manifestationen darzulegen. Zudem wollen wir dem behandelnden Rheumatologen Hinweise geben, wann ein Off-Label-Use fur beide Erkrankungen sinnvoll sein kann. The treatment of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and primary Sjogren’s syndrome (pSS) is challenging. This is not only the result of the heterogeneity of manifestations of both diseases but also due to a lack of approved therapeutic options. Approved for the treatment of SLE are hydroxychloroquine, azathioprine, belimumab, and for the treatment of severe lupus nephritis, cyclophosphamide; mycophenolate mofetil can be prescribed for the treatment of lupus nephritis according to the “Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss”. Methotrexate is not approved for the treatment of SLE but used frequently, nevertheless. Only few approved drugs exist for the treatment of glandular manifestations of pSS. The treatment of extraglandular systemic manifestations depends on the organ involved, however, there are no approved drugs, and we are always treating off-label. It is the aim of this article to outline the therapeutic options for SLE and pSS and their relevance for the treatment of individual manifestations. In addition, we would like to provide the treating rheumatologists with information on when off-label treatment is warranted for both diseases.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a highly variable disease driven by the tendency to form very different types of antibody. This sometimes leads to an exaggerated respect for the complexity of the disease symptoms and to uncertainty in dealing with affected patients; however, nowadays the most important measures in the diagnosis and management of the disease can be broken down to a manageable extent. In this respect, the new recommendations of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) on SLE and the recommendations on lupus nephritis jointly developed by EULAR and the European Renal Association/European Dialysis and Transplant Association (ERA/EDTA) are helpful, as are the new classification criteria from EULAR and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR). In this article the core points of these publications are summarized and contemporary SLE management is presented. As a rule, SLE can be effectively treated when managed in this way.

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of belimumab in patients with Primary Sjogren's syndrome (pSS). Methods The search included manuscripts assessing the efficacy or safety of belimumab in patients with pSS (American-European Consensus Criteria 2002) published between 2004 and 2017 in MEDLINE, EMBASE or Cochrane databases. Two reviewers independently selected the articles, extracted data and evaluated the quality of the evidence following Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) recommendation grades. Results Out of 135 citations, only 3 articles were included. All of them publishing results from the same study at different time points including 28 patients. At week 28 improvement was reported for visual analogue scale (VAS) dryness score and glandular manifestations in 37% and 77% of patients, respectively, which persisted at week 52 (W52). Belimumab was well tolerated and safely administered. Conclusion Published evidence to determine the efficacy of belimumab in pSS is limited. Belimumab seems to be effective to reduce systemic activity, parotid enlargement, lymphadenopathies, articular manifestation and B cell biomarkers.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a prototypical autoimmune disease with high heterogeneity but the common characterization of numerous autoantibodies and systemic inflammation which lead to the damage of multiple organs. Aberrance of B cells plays a pivotal role in the immunopathogenesis of SLE via both antibody-dependent and antibody-independent manners. Escape of autoreactive B cells from the central and peripheral tolerance checkpoints, over-activation of B cells and their excessive cytokines release which drive T cells and dendritic cells stimulation, and dysregulated surface molecules, as well as intracellular signal pathways involved in B cell biology, are all contributing to B cell aberrance and participating in the pathogenesis of SLE. Based on that rationale, targeting aberrance of B cells and relevant molecules and pathways is expected to be a promising strategy for lupus control. Multiple approaches targeting B cells through different mechanisms have been attempted, including B-cell depletion via monoclonal antibodies against B-cell-specific molecules, blockade of B-cell survival and activation factors, suppressing T-B crosstalk by interrupting costimulatory molecules and inhibiting intracellular activation signaling cascade by targeting pathway molecules in B cells. Though most attempts ended in failure, the efficacy of B-cell targeting has been encouraged by the FDA approval of belimumab that blocks B cell-activating factor (BAFF) and the recommended use of anti-CD20 as a remedial therapy in refractory lupus. Still, quantities of clinical trials targeting B cells or relevant molecules are ongoing and some of them have displayed promising preliminary results. Additionally, advances in multi-omics studies help deepen our understandings of B cell biology in lupus and may promote the discovery of novel potential therapeutic targets. The combination of real-world data with basic research achievements may pave the road to conquering lupus.

Summary Background Belimumab is approved for the treatment of active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Although clinical trials showed a favourable benefit–risk profile, numerical differences in the incidence of mortality and adverse events of special interest (AESIs) have been reported. We assessed the frequency of these events in patients with SLE receiving belimumab or placebo plus standard therapy. Methods BASE was a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 4 trial done in 33 countries. Adults with active SLE were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous belimumab (10 mg/kg) or placebo, plus standard therapy, for 48 weeks. The primary endpoints were incidences of all-cause mortality and AESIs during the on-treatment period (first-to-last study drug dose + 28 days). Safety analyses were done in the as-treated population (patients grouped by actual treatment received >50% of the time). This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT01705977 ). Findings Between Nov 27, 2012, and July 28, 2017, we randomly assigned 4018 patients. The as-treated population included 2002 patients in the belimumab group versus 2001 in the placebo group. Ten (0·50%) patients in the belimumab group died versus eight (0·40%) in the placebo group (difference 0·10%, 95% CI −0·31 to 0·51). Incidences were similar in the belimumab and placebo groups for serious infections (75 [3·75%] of 2002 vs 82 [4·10%] of 2001; difference −0·35%, 95% CI −1·55 to 0·85), opportunistic infections and other infections of interest (36 [1·80%] vs 50 [2·50%]; −0·70%, −1·60 to 0·20), non-melanoma skin cancers (4 [0·20%] vs 3 [0·15%]; 0·05%, −0·21 to 0·31) and other malignancies (5 [0·25%] vs 5 [0·25%]; 0·00%, −0·31 to 0·31). A higher proportion of patients in the belimumab group than in the placebo group had infusion and hypersensitivity reactions (8 [0·40%] vs 2 [0·10%]; 0·30%, −0·01 to 0·61), serious depression (7 [0·35%] vs 1 [0·05%]; 0·30%, 0·02 to 0·58), treatment-emergent suicidality (28 [1·42%] of 1972 patients vs 23 [1·16%] of 1986; 0·26%, −0·44 to 0·96), and sponsor-adjudicated serious suicide or self-injury (15 [0·75%] of 1972 patients vs 5 [0·25%] of 1986; post hoc difference 0·50%, 0·06 to 0·94). Interpretation In line with previously published data, incidences of all-cause mortality and AESIs were similar in patients given belimumab and placebo, except for serious infusion or hypersensitivity reactions, serious depression, treatment-emergent suicidality, and sponsor-adjudicated serious suicide or self-injury events. Funding GSK.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic, multisystem, autoimmune disease of unknown etiology, whose hallmark is the production of autoantibodies. B cells are promising targets for novel SLE therapies. In 2011, belimumab (Benlysta®), a fully humanized monoclonal antibody inhibiting B-cell activation and proliferation, was the first medication in 50 years to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to treat adult SLE. This review discusses the current experience with B-cell-targeted therapies, including those targeting B-cell-surface antigens (rituximab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, obinutuzumab, obexelimab, epratuzumab, daratumumab), B-cell survival factors (belimumab, tabalumab, atacicept, blisibimod), or B-cell intracellular functions (ibrutinib, fenebrutinib, proteasome inhibitors), for the management of SLE. It focuses on ongoing clinical trials and real-world post-marketing use, where available, including their safety profiles, and concludes with our recommendations for B-cell-centric approaches to the management of SLE.

Purpose of review Lupus nephritis is a common severe manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus. Despite recent advances in therapeutics and understanding of its pathogenesis, there are still substantial unmet needs. This review discusses recent discoveries in these areas, especially the role of tubulointerstitial inflammation (TII) in lupus nephritis. Recent findings Non-white ethnicity is still a major risk and poor prognostic factor in lupus nephritis. TII and fibrosis have been found to be associated with worse renal outcome but the current lupus nephritis treatment guidelines and trials are based on the degree of glomerular inflammation. In combination with mycophenolate mofetil, a B-cell-targeted therapy (belimumab) and a calcineurin inhibitor (voclosporin) have shown efficacy in recent lupus nephritis trials. However, response rates have been modest. While lupus glomerulonephritis results from immune complex deposition derived from systemic autoantibodies, TII arises from complex processes associated with in situ adaptive cell networks. These include local antibody production, and cognate or antigen-induced interactions between T follicular helper cells, and likely other T-cell populations, with antigen presenting cells including B cells, myeloid dendritic cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Summary Better understanding of the pathogenesis of TII will identify novel therapeutic targets predicted to improve outcomes in our patients with lupus nephritis.

Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) is a rare and systemic autoimmune disease, causing necrotizing vasculitis of small arteries and veins. The majority of diagnosed patients with GPA have circulating anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) directed against proteinase 3 (PR3). Here, we have reviewed the last findings and uncertainties regarding the treatment of GPA. Between the available treatments, in addition to corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide (CYP) is effective for remission-induction, while it is associated with some serious side effects, such as infertility and increased risk of malignancies. On the other side, rituximab (RTX) seems a safer alternative option and as effective as CYP. It could be used as both remission-induction and maintenance therapy in GPA patients, especially in women of childbearing age. Pregnant patients, who must not be exposed to the CYP and RTX could be well-managed with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg). Co-trimoxazole, which is widely used to treat certain bacterial infections or as prophylaxis in immunosuppressed patients, could be effective in preventing disease relapse. In the meantime, 15- deoxyspergualin, plasma exchange are other therapeutic options with a low level of evidence. Regarding potential treatments, ofatumumab, ocrelizumab, belimumab, atacicept, tabalumab, abatacept (CTLA4-Ig), and Janus kinase inhibitors seem to be effective. Renal involvement, older age, the presence of baseline organ damage, delayed-diagnosis of disease, rising in creatinine level, and higher neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio is associated with poor outcomes. Optimum doses of medications, prediction of treatment response and disease relapse, explaining lack of response in some patients, treating children with GPA, and management of GPA during the pregnancy are controversial issues, which need further studies.

Besides treating acute flares, the management of SLE should aim at preventing organ damage accrual and drug-associated harms, improving health-related quality of life and prolonging survival. At present, therapy is based on combinations of antimalarials (mainly HCQ), considered the backbone of SLE treatment, glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive drugs. However, these regimens are not universally effective and a substantial degree of damage can be caused by exposure to glucocorticoids. In this review we provide a critical appraisal of the efficacy and safety of available treatments as well as a brief discussion of potentially novel compounds in patients with SLE. We emphasize the use of methylprednisolone pulses for moderate–severe flares, followed by low–moderate doses of oral prednisone with quick tapering to maintenance doses of ≤5 mg/day, as well as the prompt institution of immunosuppressive drugs in the setting of severe disease but also as steroid-sparing agents. Indications for the use of biologic agents, namely belimumab and rituximab, in refractory or organ-threatening disease are also presented. We conclude by proposing evidence- and experience-based treatment strategies tailored to the clinical scenario and prevailing organ involvement that can aid clinicians in managing this complex disease.

Objective In light of reports of de novo LN during belimumab (BLM) treatment, we sought to determine its frequency and contributing or protective factors in a real-life setting. Methods Patients with SLE who received BLM between 2011 and 2017 at five European academic practices were enrolled (n = 95) and followed longitudinally for a median time of 13.1 months [interquartile range (IQR): 6.0–34.7]; 52.6% were anti-dsDNA positive, 60.0% had low complement levels, and 69.5% had no renal involvement prior to/at BLM initiation [mean disease duration at baseline: 11.4 (9.3) years]. Age- and sex-matched patients with non-renal SLE who had similar serological profiles, but were not exposed to BLM, served as controls (median follow-up: 132.0 months; IQR: 98.3–151.2). Results We observed 6/66 cases (9.1%) of biopsy-proven de novo LN (4/6 proliferative) among the non-renal BLM-treated SLE cases after a follow-up of 7.4 months (IQR: 2.7–22.2). Among controls, 2/66 cases (3.0%) of de novo LN (both proliferative) were observed after 21 and 50 months. BLM treatment was associated with an increased frequency and/or shorter time to de novo LN [hazard ratio (HR): 10.7; 95% CI: 1.7, 67.9; P = 0.012], while concomitant use of antimalarial agents along with BLM showed an opposing association (HR: 0.2; 95% CI: 0.03, 0.97; P = 0.046). Conclusion Addition of BLM to standard-of-care did not prevent LN in patients with active non-renal SLE, but a favourable effect of concomitant use of antimalarials was implicated. Studies of whether effects of B-cell activating factor inhibition on lymphocyte subsets contribute to LN susceptibility are warranted.

Objective To assess the safety, mechanism of action, and preliminary efficacy of rituximab followed by belimumab in the treatment of refractory lupus nephritis (LN). Methods In a multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial, 43 patients with recurrent or refractory LN were treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide (CYC), and glucocorticoids followed by weekly belimumab infusions until week 48 (RCB group), or treated with rituximab and CYC but no belimumab infusions (RC group). Patients were followed up until week 96. Percentages of total and autoreactive B cell subsets in the patients' peripheral blood were analyzed by flow cytometry. Results Treatment with belimumab did not increase the incidence of adverse events in patients with refractory LN. At week 48, a complete or partial renal response occurred in 11 (52%) of 21 patients receiving belimumab, compared to 9 (41%) of 22 patients in the RC group who did not receive belimumab (P = 0.452). Lack of improvement in or worsening of LN was the major reason for treatment failure. B cell depletion occurred in both groups, but the percentage of B cells remained lower in those receiving belimumab (geometric mean number of B cells at week 60, 53 cells/μl in the RCB group versus 11 cells/μl in the RC group; P = 0.0012). Percentages of total and autoreactive transitional B cells increased from baseline to week 48 in both groups. However, percentages of total and autoreactive naive B cells decreased from baseline to week 48 in the belimumab group compared to the no belimumab RC group (P = 0.0349), a finding that is consistent with the observed impaired maturation of naive B cells and enhanced censoring of autoreactive B cells. Conclusion The addition of belimumab to a treatment regimen with rituximab and CYC was safe in patients with refractory LN. This regimen diminished maturation of transitional to naive B cells during B cell reconstitution, and enhanced the negative selection of autoreactive B cells. Clinical efficacy was not improved with rituximab and CYC in combination with belimumab when compared to a therapeutic strategy of B cell depletion alone in patients with LN.

Objective: to determine the efficiency of sequential (combined) therapy with rituximab (RTM) and belimumab (BLM) in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).Patients and methods. Twelve patients with true SLE having moderate-to-high activity were followed up. Six of them were noted to have skin and articular manifestations and 6 had kidney damage, vasculitis. The patients took RTM at 500–2000-mg doses, with 6-methylprednisolone as premedication, whereupon they were prescribed BLM according to the standard regimen of 10 mg/kg once monthly. The follow-up period was 1 year. At baseline and every three months after RTM administration, the efficiency and tolerability of therapy were evaluated, the concentrations of autoantibodies and complement components was estimated, and the dose of oral glucocorticoids (GCs) was recorded.Results and discussion. During combined therapy with the biological agents (BAs), there was a considerable clinical and laboratory improvement: reductions in disease activity (median (Me) SLEDAI-2K scores were 12 [9.5; 17] at baseline and 2 [2; 6] at Visit 4), the Me concentrations of anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-ds-DNA) antibodies, 101 [39; 250] and 28 [6; 112] U/ml, respectively; those of complement component 3 (C3), 0.44 [0.39; 0.59] and 0.83 [0.81; 0.87] g/L, respectively; and those of complement C4, 0.06 [0.031; 0.1] and 0.16 [0.15; 0.18] g/l, respectively). Most patients received the medium and low doses of oral GCs as initiating therapy. During the year, the dose of GCs was reduced by more than a quarter and they could be completely discontinued.evaluated, the concentrations of autoantibodies and complement components was estimated, and the dose of oral glucocorticoids (GCs) was recorded. Results and discussion. During combined therapy with the biological agents (BAs), there was a considerable clinical and laboratory improvement: reductions in disease activity (median (Me) SLEDAI-2K scores were 12 [9.5; 17] at baseline and 2 [2; 6] at Visit 4), the Me concentrations of anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-ds-DNA) antibodies, 101 [39; 250] and 28 [6; 112] U/ml, respectively; those of complement component 3 (C3), 0.44 [0.39; 0.59] and 0.83 [0.81; 0.87] g/L, respectively; and those of complement C4, 0.06 [0.031; 0.1] and 0.16 [0.15; 0.18] g/l, respectively). Most patients received the medium and low doses of oral GCs as initiating therapy. During the year, the dose of GCs was reduced by more than a quarter and they could be completely discontinued. Conclusion. Combined biological therapy with RTM and BLM is a promising treatment for active SLE. The use of this regimen promotes a rapid and effective reduction in disease activity, normalization of laboratory markers of SLE (anti-ds-DNA antibody and complement C3 and C4 levels), and decreases in the dose of oral GCs and, as a consequence, in the risk of irreversible organ damages.. Combined biological therapy with RTM and BLM is a promising treatment for active SLE. The use of this regimen promotes a rapid and effective reduction in disease activity, normalization of laboratory markers of SLE (anti-ds-DNA antibody and complement C3 and C4 levels), and decreases in the dose of oral GCs and, as a consequence, in the risk of irreversible organ damages.

The phase 2 placebo‐controlled, double‐blind PLUTO trial characterized the pharmacokinetics of belimumab plus standard systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) therapy in patients with childhood‐onset SLE (cSLE) and demonstrated similar efficacy and safety to that in adult SLE. Patients with active cSLE aged 5‐17 years were randomized to intravenous belimumab 10 mg/kg every 4 weeks (n = 53). A linear 2‐compartment population pharmacokinetics (popPK) model with first‐order elimination was developed, and an exploratory exposure‐response analysis assessed the impact of between‐patient exposure variability on clinical response (SLE Responder Index 4 [SRI4]) in week 52, and occurrence of serious adverse events during the study. The popPK model estimated clearance of 158 mL/day, steady‐state volume of distribution of 3.5 L, terminal half‐life of 16.3 days, and distribution half‐life of 0.8 days in the overall population. Fat‐free mass (FFM) better characterized the pharmacokinetics than total body weight and was more consistent with allometric scaling theory; belimumab pharmacokinetics were largely determined by FFM. Age, sex, disease activity, and concomitant medication had no impact on pediatric belimumab exposure after accounting for body size. Individual and median steady‐state pediatric pharmacokinetic profiles were similar to known adult profiles and pediatric exposure estimates for belimumab 10 mg/kg intravenously were consistent with adult exposures. Exposures were similar between SRI4 responders and nonresponders, and patients who did or did not experience a serious adverse event. There was no clinically relevant correlation between exposure and efficacy or safety, confirming belimumab 10 mg/kg intravenous dose every 4 weeks as appropriate for pediatric patients with cSLE.

Introduction The real-world effectiveness of belimumab for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in six countries was evaluated in the OBSErve program. The aim of this post hoc analysis (GSK study 206351) was to pool individual patient OBSErve data to further evaluate the effectiveness of belimumab in a large sample of patients with SLE. Methods OBSErve (Argentina, Canada, Germany, Spain, Switzerland, and the USA) enrolled adults ≥ 18 years of age with SLE, who were prescribed belimumab as part of standard therapy (index: date of belimumab initiation). Endpoints (month 6 vs. index) included physician-assessed overall clinical response to belimumab in the overall population (primary) and high disease activity subgroups (secondary; patients with a SLEDAI-2K/SELENA-SLEDAI score ≥ 10 or patients with high anti-dsDNA or low complement at index); other secondary endpoints included changes in glucocorticosteroid (GCS) use and changes in disease activity. Factors associated with physician-assessed overall clinical response were also evaluated. Results In total, 830 patients were included in the overall population (mean [standard deviation (SD)] age: 41.9 [12.57] years; female: 89.3%; 60.4% from the USA). Nearly half (48.1%) of belimumab-treated patients experienced a ≥ 50% physician-assessed improvement in their overall manifestations, and 13% achieved a near normalization of their condition (equal to ≥ 80% improvement). Initiating belimumab while on high-dose (> 7.5 mg/day) GCS use was associated with ≥ 50% clinical improvement at month 6 (OR: 1.9, p = 0.003). Most (78.1%; n = 518/663) patients were able to reduce or discontinue their oral GCS dose after 6 months of belimumab, with a mean (SD) change of − 8.5 (10.74) mg/day prednisone-equivalent. The mean (SD) change from belimumab initiation in disease activity score (SLEDAI-2K/SELENA-SLEDAI) was − 5.7 (4.5; n = 344). Conclusions Belimumab improves clinical manifestations of SLE and is associated with GCS dose reductions in a real-world clinical setting, supporting the real-world effectiveness of belimumab for SLE. Electronic Supplementary Material The online version of this article (10.1007/s40744-020-00243-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Belimumab (Benlysta®), a human immunoglobulin (Ig) G1λ monoclonal antibody targeting B lymphocyte stimulator, is effective as an add-on to standard therapy in patients with active, autoantibody-positive systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Belimumab was first approved in 2011 as an intravenous (IV) treatment for adults with SLE. Since then, a subcutaneous formulation of belimumab has been approved in adults and, most recently, IV belimumab has been approved in children aged ≥ 5 years. In adults with active, autoantibody-positive SLE, add-on belimumab improves overall disease activity and flare rates. Belimumab appears to have a steroid-sparing effect and disease control is maintained over long-term use. The clinical benefits of IV belimumab in children with SLE are consistent with those in adults. Belimumab is generally well tolerated in both adults and children.

Background: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune condition with a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations encompassing most organs and systems. Its treatment approach includes different immunomodulatory treatments, of which B-cell targeted therapies are part of. Rituximab (an anti-CD20 antibody) had encouraging results in observational studies but failed when tested in clinical trials. It is theorized that this could have been partially due to BAFF upregulation, leading to rituximab failure. Therefore, targeting BAFF with belimumab after rituximab therapy, may have a synergic effect in SLE. Objective: We review the available observational data regarding sequential rituximab/belimumab therapy in SLE patients. Results: Twenty-four patients from 6 studies were included. The results suggest a benefit with this combined therapy, with reduction of the mean SLEDAI. However, there was significant drug regimen and patient selection heterogeneity. Conclusion: Further randomized clinical trials are needed to examine this drug sequencing protocol in SLE patients.

The objective of the study was to report the safety and potential therapeutic effect of belimumab in monogenic systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Consecutive children with monogenic SLE treated with belimumab were evaluated retrospectively. Response parameters assessment was completed at the time of initiation of belimumab, at 6 months, and last follow-up visit. Response parameters comprised physician global assessment (physician GA) and parent global assessment (parent GA), global disease activity as measured by SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI), and daily glucocorticoids dose. Undesirable events affecting patients during treatment were also collected. Six children with monogenic SLE proved by genetic testing (five patients with C1q deficiency and one patient with deoxyribonuclease II (DNase II) deficiency), failed glucocorticoids and sequential immunosuppressive medications. Belimumab was added to glucocorticoids and current immunosuppressive medications. The main indications for belimumab initiation were mucocutaneous disease, arthritis, and inability to taper glucocorticoids. All patients tolerated belimumab infusion. No serious events were reported. However, one patient was lost to follow-up and died because of sepsis. Compared to the baseline values, there was an improvement in physician GA, parent GA, and SLEDAI, and a notable reduction in the need of daily corticosteroids. However, there were no significant changes in the complement and ds-DNA antibody levels. Belimumab can be considered as an adjunctive therapeutic option for patients with refractory monogenic SLE. Further follow-up and more patients needed to confirm this finding and a larger prospective study is required for more definitive conclusions.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), an acquired autoimmune thrombophilia, is characterised by thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity in association with persistent antiphospholipid antibodies. The 16th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies Task Force on APS Treatment Trends reviewed the current status with regard to existing and novel treatment trends for APS, which is the focus of this Task Force report. The report addresses current treatments and developments since the last report, on the use of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with APS, antiplatelet agents, adjunctive therapies (hydroxychloroquine, statins and vitamin D), targeted treatment including rituximab, belimumab, and anti-TNF agents, complement inhibition and drugs based on peptides of beta-2-glycoprotein I. In addition, the report summarises potential new players, including coenzyme Q10, adenosine receptor agonists and adenosine potentiation. In each case, the report provides recommendations for clinicians, based on the current state of the art, and suggests a clinical research agenda. The initiation and development of appropriate clinical studies requires a focus on devising suitable outcome measures, including a disease activity index, an optimal damage index, and a specific quality of life index.

Purpose of review It is an understatement to say that drug approvals in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), lupus nephritis, and Sjogren's syndrome have lagged far behind those in other autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis. Reasons for this are multiple and include the molecular and clinical heterogeneity of these conditions; confounding by background medications, especially corticosteroids; and clinical trial endpoints. However, the tides are changing, and there have been several bright spots in our attempts to bring more efficacious drugs to our patients. Recent findings Several positive phase II and phase III trials in SLE and lupus nephritis with drugs such as anifrolumab, voclosporin, belimumab, and obinutuzumab will no doubt eventually generate regulatory approvals for most, if not all, of these drugs. Although early in development, the promising results in Sjogren's syndrome with iscalimab and ianalumab should make the Sjogren's syndrome community quite hopeful of future drug approvals. Summary In this review, we highlight recent study results in Sjogren's syndrome, SLE, and lupus nephritis, emphasizing investigational therapies in late stage development, but we also provide a glimpse into drugs of the future.

Daratumumab, a human monoclonal antibody that targets CD38, depletes plasma cells and is approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Long-lived plasma cells are implicated in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus because they secrete autoantibodies, but they are unresponsive to standard immunosuppression. We describe the use of daratumumab that induced substantial clinical responses in two patients with life-threatening lupus, with the clinical responses sustained by maintenance therapy with belimumab, an antibody to B-cell activating factor. Significant depletion of long-lived plasma cells, reduction of interferon type I activity, and down-regulation of T-cell transcripts associated with chronic inflammation were documented. (Supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and others.).

Systemic lupus erythematosus is a rare lifelong multi-systemic autoimmune condition. Juvenile-onset SLE (JSLE) is recognized to have a more active disease course when compared with adult-onset disease and patients have a worse long-term survival. Kidney involvement occurs in over 50% of children and treatment decisions are guided by the histological classification. Several international groups have produced treatment protocols that rely on an intense period of immunosuppression to halt the acute kidney inflammatory process, followed by maintenance therapy with close observation for disease improvement and prompt evaluation of disease flares. A reduced glomerular filtration rate at presentation is predictive of later stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) in multivariate analysis. Kidney remission remains suboptimal with only 40–60% of patients achieving complete remission. Kidney flares are seen in over a third of patients. The rate of CKD 5 is reported to be up to 15% and the presence of lupus nephritis (LN) has an established link with an associated increase in mortality. In established kidney failure, transplantation seems to be the optimal kidney replacement modality for this group of patients, ideally after a period of disease quiescence. Modified outcome measures in clinical trials have demonstrated that biologic agents can be effective in this disease. Current biologic agents under investigation include obinutuzimab, belimumab, atacicept, anifrolumab, tocilizumab, eculizumab, dapirolizumab, and abatacept. Future research should focus on discovering early disease biomarkers, including surrogates for later cardiovascular disease, and evaluating biological agents as adjuncts to improve the rates of complete remission and subsequently influence the kidney outcome. The aim of this review article is to summarize the current kidney outcomes for this disease with a view to identifying key areas that may help to reduce the risk of long-term CKD.

ObjectivesThis ongoing Phase-2, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study evaluated the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of intravenous belimumab in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE).MethodsPatients (5 to 17 years) were randomised to belimumab 10 mg/kg intravenous or placebo every 4 weeks, plus standard SLE therapy. Primary endpoint: SLE Responder Index (SRI4) response rate (Week 52). Key major secondary endpoints: proportion of patients achieving the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation/American College of Rheumatology (PRINTO/ACR) response using 50 and ‘30 alternative’ definitions (Week 52), and sustained response (Weeks 44 to 52) by SRI4 and Parent Global Assessment of well-being (Parent-global). Safety and pharmacokinetics were assessed. Study not powered for statistical testing.ResultsNinety-three patients were randomised (belimumab, n=53; placebo, n=40). At Week 52, there were numerically more SRI4 responders with belimumab versus placebo (52.8% vs 43.6%; OR 1.49 (95% CI 0.64 to 3.46)). PRINTO/ACR 30 alternative (52.8% vs 27.5%; OR 2.92 (95% CI 1.19 to 7.17)) and PRINTO/ACR 50 (60.4% vs 35.0%; OR 2.74 (95% CI 1.15 to 6.54)) responses were more frequent with belimumab than placebo, as were sustained responses for SRI4 (belimumab, 43.4%; placebo, 41.0%; OR 1.08 (95% CI 0.46 to 2.52)) and Parent-global (belimumab, 59.1%; placebo, 33.3%; OR 3.49 (95% CI 1.23 to 9.91)). Serious adverse events were reported in 17.0% of belimumab patients and 35.0% of placebo patients; one death occurred (placebo). Week-52, geometric mean (95% CI) belimumab trough concentration was 56.2 (45.2 to 69.8) µg/mL.ConclusionThe belimumab intravenous pharmacokinetics and benefit–risk profile in cSLE are consistent with adult belimumab studies and the 10 mg/kg every 4 weeks dose is appropriate.Trial registration numberNCT01649765.

Belimumab (Benlysta®) is a fully humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits B lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS, also known as B cell-activating factor of the tumor necrosis factor family) and was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Evaluation Agency for the treatment of autoantibody-positive systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in adults with moderate disease activity. Belimumab was recently FDA approved for use in children with SLE between 5 and 17 years of age. This review discusses the key findings of the belimumab phase III trials in adult SLE (via intravenous and subcutaneous administrations), phase II trial in pediatric SLE (intravenous administration), and post hoc analyses. It also evaluates the current clinical trials of belimumab in specific SLE disease states and highlights the safety profile of belimumab. It discusses the clinical post-marketing use of belimumab in adults and children with SLE and concludes with our recommendations for the use of belimumab to treat pediatric SLE, including a look to the future with increased real-world use in children with SLE.

B cells are an essential component of the adaptive immune system. Since the late 1990s biologic drugs targeting B cells have been used to treat not only lymphoproliferative diseases of B-cell lineage cells but also autoimmune diseases, in particular, those associated with autoantibody production. Although some of these agents are relatively safe, they have been associated with serious infections including opportunistic infections. To what extent the infectious complications reported are directly related to the use of the B-cell targeting agent or to previous and/or concomitant immunosuppressive therapies and/or the specific disease being treated is often difficult to ascertain.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disorder that affects almost every organ system and it is treated with immunomodulation and immunosuppression. SLE patients have an intrinsically dysfunctional immune system which is exacerbated by disease activity and leaves them vulnerable to infection. Treatment with immunosuppression increases susceptibility to infection, while hydroxychloroquine use decreases this risk. Infectious diseases are a leading cause of hospitalization and death.This narrative review provides an overview of recent epidemiology and predictors of infections in SLE, delineates the risk of infection by therapeutic agent, and provides suggestions for risk mitigation. Articles were selected from Pubmed searches conducted between September 2019 and January 2020.Despite the large burden of infection, effective and safe preventative care such as universal hydroxychloroquine use and vaccination are underutilized. Future efforts should be directed to quality improvement, glucocorticoid reduction, and validation of risk indices that identify patients at the highest risk of infection.

Purpose of review Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is a highly heterogeneous autoimmune disease. No specific Federal Drug Administration-approved therapies for CLE-alone are available, and resistance to conventional treatments is common. This review will summarize current treatment approaches and pending treatment strategies. Recent findings Research into the pathogenesis of CLE is accelerating. A skewed type I interferon production and response contribute to CLE lesions. The pathophysiology of lesions may be similar among the lesional subtypes, and patients with a more TLR9-driven disease mechanism may have more benefit from hydroxychloroquine. Case reports continue to support the use of dapsone for CLE, especially bullous lupus erythematosus. Rituximab and Belimumab have efficacy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and severe active CLE. The significant role for type I interferons in CLE and encouraging clinical data suggest anifrolumab as a very promising agent for CLE. Dapirolizumab, BIIB059, Ustekinumab and Janus kinase inhibitors also have supportive early data as promising new strategies for CLE treatment. Summary Continued research to understand the mechanisms driving CLE will facilitate the development and approval of new targets. The pipeline for new treatments is rich.