1. Radiation-associated angiosarcoma of the breast: analysis of diagnostic tools in a registry-based population
- Author
-
Samuli H. Salminen, Juho Salo, Tom Böhling, Carl Blomqvist, Maija Tarkkanen, Katja Hukkinen, and Mika Sampo
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced ,Biopsy ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Hemangiosarcoma ,Population ,Contrast Media ,Breast Neoplasms ,030230 surgery ,Diagnostic tools ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Breast cancer ,Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted ,medicine ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Angiosarcoma ,Registries ,education ,Finland ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,education.field_of_study ,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Cancer ,Magnetic resonance imaging ,General Medicine ,medicine.disease ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,3. Good health ,Radiation therapy ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Radiation associated ,Female ,Radiology ,Tomography, X-Ray Computed ,business - Abstract
Background Radiation-associated angiosarcoma of the breast (RAASB) is a serious late consequence caused by breast cancer treatment. Initial symptoms are often inconspicuous, thus contributing to diagnostic delay. Most previous studies of the diagnostic aspects of RAASB are case reports. Purpose To perform a complete review of the imaging findings and biopsy methods in a nationwide RAASB cohort. Material and Methods RAASB patients were identified from a national cancer registry and additional patients were included from our hospital. All available information from imaging (mammogram [MGR], ultrasound [US], magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], and computed tomography [CT]) and biopsies was reviewed. The sensitivity of imaging and biopsy methods for detection of RAASB was calculated. Results Fifty-eight patients with RAASB were found. Fourteen MGR, 30 US, 24 MRI, and 25 CT studies were available for evaluation. The sensitivity of MGR, US, MRI, and CT for detection of RAASB was 43%, 50%, 92%, and 84%, respectively. Superior sensitivity was demonstrated for punch biopsy (84%) and incisional biopsy (93%) compared to fine-needle aspiration cytology (0%) and core needle biopsy (18%). Conclusion MRI and CT have comparable sensitivity for detection of RAASB, while MGR and US are unreliable. However, negative findings in MRI or CT must be interpreted with caution. Punch biopsy and incisional biopsy are the preferred biopsy methods.
- Published
- 2020