Search

Spread through air spaces (STAS) is reportedly associated with worse prognosis in sublobar resections of lung adenocarcinoma. Recently, it was proposed that STAS detected on frozen sections can be an indication for lobectomy instead of sublobar resection. We undertook this study to evaluate the reliability of STAS assessment on frozen sections compared to permanent sections, as well as the associations among STAS, tumor grade, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) after sublobar resection. A total of 163 stage I lung adenocarcinoma resections with frozen sections were identified retrospectively. For each case, and for frozen and permanent sections separately, the presence or absence of STAS, as well as the tumor grade, were recorded. Compared to permanent sections, STAS detection on frozen sections had low sensitivity (55%), low positive predictive value (48%), and fair agreement (K = 0.34), whereas there was higher specificity (80%) and negative predictive value (85%). Accuracy was 74%. Tumor grade assessment on frozen sections showed higher sensitivity (77%), positive predictive value (90%), agreement (K = 0.72), specificity (94%), and accuracy (87%), and the same negative predictive value (85%). High-grade histology on frozen sections was associated with shorter RFS (p = 0.02), whereas STAS on frozen sections was not (p = 0.47). Our results suggest that the intraoperative detection of STAS has low sensitivity and positive predictive value. False-positive results may lead to overtreatment of patients with lung cancer. The determination of tumor grade on frozen sections offers better sensitivity and specificity, plus it is associated with RFS, whereas STAS on frozen sections is not. Further study is needed to explore the utility of assessing tumor grade on frozen sections.

Background Rapid intraoperative diagnosis for unconfirmed pulmonary tumor is extremely important for determining the optimal surgical procedure (lobectomy or sublobar resection). Attempts to diagnose malignant tumors using mass spectrometry (MS) have recently been described. This study evaluated the usefulness of MS and artificial intelligence (AI) for differentiating primary lung adenocarcinoma (PLAC) and colorectal metastatic pulmonary tumor. Methods Pulmonary samples from 40 patients who underwent pulmonary resection for PLAC (20 tumors, 20 normal lungs) or pulmonary metastases originating from colorectal metastatic pulmonary tumor (CRMPT) (20 tumors, 20 normal lungs) were collected and analyzed retrospectively by probe electrospray ionization‐MS. AI using random forest (RF) algorithms was employed to evaluate the accuracy of each combination. Results The accuracy of the machine learning algorithm applied using RF to distinguish malignant tumor (PLAC or CRMPT) from normal lung was 100%. The algorithms offered 97.2% accuracy in differentiating PLAC and CRMPT. Conclusions MS combined with an AI system demonstrated high accuracy not only for differentiating cancer from normal tissue, but also for differentiating between PLAC and CRMPT with a short working time. This method shows potential for application as a support tool facilitating rapid intraoperative diagnosis to determine the surgical procedure for pulmonary resection., Rapid intraoperative diagnosis for unconfirmed lung tumor is extremely important determining the surgical procedure. This study evaluated the usefulness of mass spectrometry (MS) for differentiating primary lung adenocarcinoma (PLAC) and colorectal metastatic pulmonary tumor (CRMPT). MS demonstrated high accuracy for differentiating not only cancer from normal tissue, but also PLAC and CRMPT with a short working time, suggesting the potential for application to rapid intraoperative diagnosis.

OBJECTIVES The short-term efficacy of virtual-assisted lung mapping (VAL-MAP), a preoperative bronchoscopic multi-spot lung-marking technique, has been confirmed in 2 prospective multicentre studies. The objectives of this study were to analyse the local recurrence and survival of patients enrolled in these studies, long-term. METHODS Of the 663 patients enrolled in the 2 studies, 559 patients’ follow-up data were collected. After excluding those who did not undergo VAL-MAP, whose resection was not for curative intent, who underwent concurrent resection without VAL-MAP, or who eventually underwent lobectomy instead of sublobar resection (i.e. wedge resection or segmentectomy), 422 patients were further analysed. RESULTS Among 264 patients with primary lung cancer, the 5-year local recurrence-free rate was 98.4%, and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 94.5%. Limited to stage IA2 or less (≤2 cm in diameter; n = 238, 90.1%), the 5-year local recurrence-free and OS rates were 98.7% and 94.8%, respectively. Among 102 patients with metastatic lung tumours, the 5-year local recurrence-free rate was 93.8% and the 5-year OS rate was 81.8%. Limited to the most common (colorectal) cancer (n = 53), the 5-year local recurrence-free and OS rates were 94.9% and 82.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS VAL-MAP, which is beneficial in localizing small barely palpable pulmonary lesions and determining the appropriate resection lines, was associated with reasonable long-term outcomes. Subj collection 152, 1542

As diagnoses of small ground glass nodule (GGN)-type lung adenocarcinoma are increasing due to the increasing frequency of computed tomography (CT) screening, surgical treatment for GGN-type lung adenocarcinoma has rapidly become more common. However, the appropriate surgical extent for these lesions remains unclear; therefore, several retrospective studies have been published and prospectively randomized controlled trials are being undertaken. This article takes a closer look at each clinical study. Convincing evidence must be published on 2 issues for sublobar resection to be accepted as a standard surgical option for GGN lung adenocarcinoma. In the absence of such evidence, it is better to perform lobar resection as long as the patient has sufficient lung function. The first issue is the definition of a sufficient resection margin, and the second is whether lymph node metastasis is conclusively ruled out before surgery. An additional issue is the need for an accurate calculation of the total size and solid size on CT. Given the results of clinical studies so far, wedge resection or segmentectomy shows a good prognosis for GGNs with a total size of 2 cm or less. Therefore, sublobar resection will play a key role even in patients who can tolerate lobectomy.

Thoracic surgeons need to be aware of several important points regarding intraoperative lymph node dissection during surgery for non-small cell lung cancer with ground-glass opacities. The first point relates to the need for lymph node dissection during sublobar resection. Since even patients undergoing sublobar resection may benefit from lymph node dissection, it should be selectively performed according to adequate indications, which require further study. Second, there seems to be no difference in postoperative morbidity between systematic sampling and systematic dissection, but the survival benefit from systematic dissection remains unclear. The results of randomized controlled trials on this topic are conflicting, and their evidence is jeopardized by a high risk of bias in terms of the study design. Therefore, further randomized controlled trials with a sound design should investigate this issue. Third, more favorable survival outcomes tend to be positively associated with the number of examined lymph nodes. Minimum requirements for the number of examined lymph nodes in non-small cell lung cancer should be defined in the future. Finally, lobe-specific lymph node dissection does not have a negative prognostic impact. It should not be routinely performed, but it can be recommended in selected patients with smaller, less invasive tumors. Results from an ongoing randomized controlled trial on this topic should be awaited.

This study sought to examine the impact of nodule density on recurrence and survival in female patients with lung adenocarcinoma treated by lobectomy or sublobar resection.In this retrospective study of female patients who underwent surgical resection for pathologic stage IA adenocarcinoma, patients with preoperative imaging were included for analysis if the consolidation-to-tumor ratio was 0.5 (solid-predominant ground-glass opacity [GGO]) to 1.0 (solid). Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to estimate overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Risk estimates were calculated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.For all 357 patients sublobar resection demonstrated worse 5-year DFS compared with lobectomy (76.4% vs 67.9%, P = .05). Multivariable modeling showed worse DFS with sublobar resection (hazard ratio, 1.55; P = .06) and tumors ≥ 2 cm (hazard ratio, 2.32; P = .05). On radiologic evaluation the solid-predominant GGO group (n = 81) demonstrated a smaller solid component compared with the solid nodule group (n = 163; 1.49 cm vs. 1.84 cm, respectively; P.001) yet comparable total size. The solid-predominant GGO group showed improved 5-year OS (90.8 vs 76.8, P = .01) and DFS (79.3 vs 67.2, P = .05) compared with the solid nodule group. Additionally the solid-predominant GGO group demonstrated equivalent OS (90.8% vs 90.8%, P = .93) and DFS (76.0% vs 81.7%, P = .60) with sublobar resection compared with lobectomy.In this report of female patients with stage IA adenocarcinoma, sublobar resection was associated with worse DFS compared with lobectomy in whole-group analysis. However patients with solid-predominant GGOs demonstrated improved 5-year OS and DFS compared with patients with solid nodules with equivalent outcomes regardless of resection type.

Tumor spread through air spaces (STAS) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is known to influence a poor patient outcome, even in patients presenting with early-stage disease. However, the pre-operative diagnosis of STAS remains challenging. With the progress of radiomics-based analyses several attempts have been made to predict STAS based on radiological findings. In the present study, patients with NSCLC which is located peripherally and tumors ≤ 2 cm in size on computed tomography (CT) that were potential candidates for sublobar resection were enrolled in this study. The radiologic features of the targeted tumors on thin-section CT were extracted using the PyRadiomics v3.0 software package, and a predictive model for STAS was built using the t-test and XGBoost. Thirty-five out of 226 patients had a STAS histology. The predictive model of STAS indicated an area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.77. There was no significant difference in the overall survival (OS) for lobectomy between the predicted-STAS (+) and (−) groups (p = 0.19), but an unfavorable OS for sublobar resection was indicated in the predicted-STAS (+) group (p

The traditional segmentectomy involves each segment as the least surgical unit to preserve more pulmonary parenchyma than lobectomy, which is also excessive for small ground glass opacity-dominated lung cancer. We report a novel technique of sublobar resection based on subsegment. Under the guidance of three-dimensional computed tomography bronchography and angiography, the nodules were classified according to their subsegmental location and removed by individual sublobar resection. That assists in removing malignant nodules with safe margins and preserves more pulmonary parenchyma. However, the oncologic efficacy and pulmonary function protection warrant follow-up.

Purpose To evaluate long-term outcomes after sublobar resection for patients with clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma who met our proposed node-negative (N0) criteria, namely solid component size d -glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT). Patients and Methods Between April 2006 and December 2010, a total of 347 patients with clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma underwent complete resection in two medical centers. Long-term outcomes of patients with disease that met the N0 criteria after sublobar resection were evaluated. Results The disease of 201 patients (57.9%) met the N0 criteria. Meeting N0 criteria was significantly associated with low-grade adenocarcinoma subtype (P Conclusions Sublobar resection of clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma is feasible in selected patients with disease that meets the N0 criteria, with excellent long-term survival.

Background A pathologically confirmed negative margin is required when performing sublobar resection in patients with early stage peripheral lung adenocarcinoma. However, the optimal margin distance to ensure complete tumor resection while preserving healthy lung tissue remains unknown. We aimed to establish a reliable distance range for negative margins. Methods A total of 52 intraoperative para-cancer tissue specimens from patients with peripheral lung adenocarcinoma with pathological tumors ≤2 cm in size were examined. Depending on the distance from the tumor edge (D), the para-cancer tissues were divided into the following five groups: D Results Group V, in which the margin was the farthest from the tumor edge, was the safest. There were significant safety differences in between groups I and V (χ2 = 26.217, P 2 = 9.420, P P = 0.207; P = 0.610). Conclusions We suggest that when performing sublobar resection in patients with early stage peripheral lung adenocarcinoma with pathological tumor sizes ≤2 cm, the resection margin distance should be ≥1 cm to ensure a negative margin.

The increasing use of low-dose CT for screening for lung cancer will inevitably identify many small, asymptomatic lung nodules and ground-glass opacities (GGOs). Current guidelines for the management of screening-detected lesions tend to advise a conservative approach based on serial imaging and intervention only if ‘suspicious’ features emerge. However, more recent developments in thoracic surgery and in the understanding of the screening-detected lesions themselves prompt some pertinent questions over this conservatism. Is CT surveillance sufficiently reliable to exclude malignancy? Is it really necessary to hold back on operative biopsy and resection given modern surgical safety and efficacy? Is the option for early surgical therapy a viable one—especially with the availability of sublobar resection today? Modern data suggests that the risk of inaction for some screening-detected lesions may be higher than expected, whereas the potential harm of surgical intervention may be substantially reduced by sublobar resection and the latest minimally invasive surgical techniques. A more pro-active approach towards offering surgery for screening-detected lesions should now be considered.

Background Current recommendations for segmentectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) include size ≤2 cm, margins ≥ 2 cm, and no nodal involvement. This study further stratifies the selection criteria for segmentectomy using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Methods The NCDB was queried for patients with high-grade (poorly/undifferentiated) T1a/b peripheral NSCLC (tumor size ≤2 cm), who underwent either lobectomy or segmentectomy. Patients with pathologic node-positive disease or who received neoadjuvant/adjuvant treatments were excluded. Propensity score analysis was used to adjust for differences in pretreatment characteristics. Results 11 091 patients were included with 10 413 patients (93.9%) treated with lobectomy and 678 patients (6.1%) underwent segmentectomy. In a propensity matched pair analysis of 1282 patients, lobectomy showed significantly improved median survival of 88.48 months vs 68.30 months for segmentectomy, P = .004. On multivariate Cox regression, lobectomy was associated with significantly improved survival (hazard ratio (HR): .81, 95% CI .72-.92, P = .001). Subgroup analysis of propensity score matched patients with a Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score (CDCC) of 0 also demonstrated a trend of improved survival with lobectomy. Discussion Lobectomy may confer significant survival advantage over segmentectomy for high-grade NSCLC (≤2 cm). More work is needed to further stratify various NSCLC histologies with their respective grades allowing more comprehensive selection criteria for segmentectomy.

Background Although sublobar resection has become widely used for lung cancer treatment, very limited data comparing outcomes following complex segmentectomy or wedge resection have been available. Questions remain regarding mortality, morbidity, surgical margin, lymph node dissection, and long-term survival outcomes. This study compares operative and postoperative outcomes of complex segmentectomy and wedge resection. Patients and Methods A total of 216 patients with clinical stage I lung cancer who underwent complex segmentectomy (n = 110) or wedge resection (n = 106) between April 2007 and March 2017 were retrospectively reviewed, and 61 propensity score–matched pairs were analyzed. Operative and postoperative results were compared. Factors affecting survival were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Although the complex segmentectomy group tended to have higher overall complications (26.2% vs. 16.4%; P = .27) and prolonged air leakage (11.5% vs. 6.6%; P = .53) rates than the wedge resection group, major complications (≥grade IIIa) (0% vs. 3.3%; P = .50) and 30-day mortality (0% vs. 0%; P = 1.00) rates were comparable between both groups. Complex segmentectomy provided better median surgical margin distance (15.0 vs. 10.0 mm; P = .052) and number of dissected lymph nodes (6.0 vs. 0.0 nodes; P = .0002) than wedge resection. The complex segmentectomy group tended to have better prognosis than the wedge resection group (5-year overall survival rates, 94.7% vs. 79.4% and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates, 94.0% vs. 76.5%, respectively). Conclusions Complex segmentectomy could provide better oncological and survival outcomes with acceptable perioperative safety compared with wedge resection.

The purpose of this study was to assess the clinicopathologic implications of tumor spread through air spaces (STAS) in patients with stage IA part-solid lung adenocarcinoma after sublobar resection.Medical records of patients with stage IA part-solid adenocarcinoma who underwent curative pulmonary resection between February 2009 and December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. The clinicopathological features of STAS and its influence on postoperative recurrence and survival were investigated.Among the 115 patients with stage IA part-solid adenocarcinoma who underwent wedge resection, 20 (17.4 %) had STAS. The multivariable analysis showed presence of STAS [HR (hazard ratio), 9.447; p = 0.002) and a larger invasive component size (HR, 1.097; p = 0.034) were independent risk factors for recurrence. The 5-year freedom from recurrence rates were 62.4 % and 97.9 % in cases with and without STAS, respectively (p 0.001), and the 5-year disease-free survival rates were 58.5 % and 97.9 % in cases with and without STAS, respectively (p 0.001). The presence of STAS was associated with old age (p = 0.030), male gender (p = 0.023), acinar predominant histologic pattern (p = 0.004), presence of micropapillary pattern (p 0.001), lymphovascular invasion (p 0.001) and larger invasive component (p 0.001).STAS could be an important prognostic factor in patients with stage IA part-solid lung adenocarcinoma after sublobar resection. Effective preoperative evaluation and postoperative surveillance may help improve the outcome of patients with small part-solid nodules, particularly when accompanied by STAS.

Background Invasive adenocarcinoma intraoperatively underestimated as adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) or minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) based on frozen section (FS) is more likely to undergo insufficient resection. We aimed to investigate the predictors of upstage and treatment strategies for stage IA invasive adenocarcinoma after sublobar resection for AIS and MIA. Methods We identified 2,006 patients from January 2012 to December 2016 with early-stage lung adenocarcinoma who underwent sublobar resection based on FS diagnosis to guide surgical decision-making. All FS were categorized into three groups in real-time: (I) atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH), (II) AIS, and (III) MIA. Results A total of 272 (13.5%, 272/2,006) cases were upstaged in the final pathology (FP) diagnosis (82 AAH to AIS, 127 AIS to MIA, and nine AIS and 54 MIA to invasive adenocarcinoma), and most upstage cases (64.3%, 175/272) were attributed to sampling error. Multivariate logistic regression showed that tumor size ≥1 cm was the only independent predictor of upstage. The upstage of 209 cases to AIS or MIA had no influence on the therapy because the extent of their resection was enough. Of the 63 cases upstaged to invasive adenocarcinoma, only 13 cases agreed to receive complementary treatment: five patients underwent complementary lobectomy, and seven patients received chemotherapy. Two invasive adenocarcinoma cases without complementary treatment experienced a local recurrence after surgery. No recurrence was observed in AAH, AIS and MIA. No patient died until December 01, 2019. Conclusions Timely complementary treatment is encouraged in AIS/MIA upstaged to invasive adenocarcinoma based on the FP after sublobar resection to avoid local recurrence. Pathologists should be more cautious about AIS and MIA with tumor size ≥1 cm to avoid underestimation and potentially insufficient resection.

Background The interaction between tumor size and the comparative prognosis of lobar and sublobar resection has been defined poorly. Research Question The purpose of this study was to characterize the relationship between tumor size and the receipt of segmentectomy or lobectomy in association with overall survival in patients with clinically node-negative non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Study Design and Methods The 2004-2015 National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for patients with cT1-3N0M0 NSCLC who underwent segmentectomy or lobectomy without neoadjuvant therapy or missing survival data. The primary outcome was overall survival, which was evaluated using multivariate Cox proportional hazards including an interaction term between tumor size and type of surgery. Results A total of 143,040 patients were included: 135,446 (95%) underwent lobectomy and 7594 (5%) underwent segmentectomy. In multivariate Cox regression, a significant three-way interaction was found among tumor size, histologic results, and type of surgery (P Interpretation In this NCDB study of patients with node-negative NSCLC, we found different tumor size thresholds, based on histologic results, that identified populations of patients who least and most benefitted from lobectomy compared with segmentectomy.

OBJECTIVES The aims of this study were to describe the potential selection criteria for patients scheduled for lobectomy versus segmentectomy for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer and to compare the 2 procedures in terms of intraoperative variables and postoperative outcomes using the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) Registry. METHODS This observational multicentre retrospective cross-sectional study was based on data collected from the ESTS database. The following were set as inclusion criteria: pulmonary lobectomy or segmentectomy for stage I primary lung cancer (according to 8th TNM edition), no previous lung surgery and no induction chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Statistical significance was examined using Mann–Whitney or 2 proportions Z tests. RESULTS Among 63 542 patients enrolled in the ESTS database (2007–2018), 17 692 met the inclusion criteria: 15 845 patients received lobectomy and 1847 segmentectomy. Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy and VATS segmentectomy were the 27.8% and 31.9% of the procedures, respectively. Lobectomy group was significantly younger and had a lower American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) score, lower comorbidities prevalence and better respiratory function. The segmentectomy group had lower complications rate (25.6% vs 33.8%). When considering only the last 5 years, ASA score was similar between the 2 groups, although pulmonary function remained significantly lower in the segmentectomy group. CONCLUSIONS According to the ESTS database, segmentectomy was preferably offered to ‘compromised’ patients, with limited respiratory function, higher ASA score and relevant comorbidities. Nevertheless, the procedure showed lower complications rate and similar short-term outcomes compared to lobectomy. During the last 5 years, segmentectomy appeared to be regarded as a valid alternative, even for selected patients who could tolerate both procedures.

Objectives To determine if superior segmentectomy has equivalent overall (OS), disease-free (DFS), and locoregional-recurrence-free survival (LRFS) to lower lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the superior segment. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all Stage 1 lower lobectomies for superior segment lesions and superior segmentectomies at our hospital from 2000 to 2018. Comparison statistics and Cox hazard modeling were performed to determine differences between groups and attempt to identify risk factors for OS, DFS, and LRFS. Results Superior segmentectomy patients, compared with lower lobectomy patients, had more current smokers, worse forced expiratory volume in 1 s percentage, radiologic emphysema scores, clinically and pathologically smaller tumors, and more occurrences of 0 lymph nodes examined. Outcomes for superior segmentectomy compared with lower lobectomy were equivalent for 5-year OS (67.0% vs. 75.1%, p = 0.70), DFS (56.9% vs. 60.4%, p = 0.59), and LRFS (87.9% vs. 91.3%, p = 0.46). Multivariable Cox modeling lacked utility due to no outcome differences. Conclusions In well-selected patients, superior segmentectomies can have equivalent OS, DFS, and LRFS compared with lower lobectomies of superior segment tumors for early stage lung cancer. Further data are needed to provide better risk estimates.

Background Sublobar resection is sometimes performed as a surgical treatment for small peripheral tumors. However, there is a question about whether sublobar resection is adequate treatment when visceral pleural invasion is diagnosed postoperatively. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognosis of patients with small-sized stage IB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after sublobar resection. Methods From January 2010 to December 2018, 227 consecutive patients with eighth edition TNM stage IB NSCLC (per the joint staging system of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the American Joint Committee on Cancer) underwent curative surgery at a single center. Those patients were reviewed retrospectively. The clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis were compared between the sublobar resection group and the lobectomy group. The sublobar resection group included only small-sized (invasive component size ≤2 cm) NSCLC. Results In all study patients, clinicopathological characteristics between the sublobar resection and lobectomy groups were not different except in maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and invasive component size. The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate was 80.7% after sublobar resection and 73.4% after lobectomy (P=0.349). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 87.3% after sublobar resection and 84.8% after lobectomy (P=0.503). In patients with small-sized NSCLC, the clinicopathological characteristics were not different between the sublobar resection group and the lobectomy group. The 5-year RFS rate was 80.7% after sublobar resection and 72.3% after lobectomy (P=0.417). The 5-year OS rate was 87.3% after sublobar resection and 91.2% after lobectomy (P=0.956). Sublobar resection was not a risk factor for recurrence in the multivariate analysis. Conclusions The prognosis of sublobar resection in patients with small-sized stage IB NSCLC was comparable with lobectomy. Thus, additional completion lobectomy may not be essential in this setting, despite postoperative upstaging from T1 to T2a.

Air space invasion of tumours, particularly spread through air spaces (STAS), is a relatively recent concept that has been identified as a novel mechanism of invasion. It has predominantly been described in lung adenocarcinoma, although it may be seen in other primary lung malignancies as well. STAS in lung cancer has been reported to have numerous associations with poor survival. The objective of this article was to review the concept of air space invasion, update findings regarding its clinical impact, and discuss controversies in the field. With this aim, we performed a PubMed search of the English-language literature. STAS has been introduced as a novel mechanism of invasion that is important for pathologists to recognise. There is a compelling body of evidence associating the presence of STAS with lower survival and suggesting that STAS is an independent prognostic factor, regardless of the stage of tumour. The standard of care for lung adenocarcinomas with STAS irrespective of size of tumour and nodal metastasis may be lobectomy rather than sublobar resection, owing to the risk of locoregional recurrence. Emerging data suggest that more work should be performed to improve consensus on and identification of STAS, including at frozen section.

Background Few studies have examined the differential impact of sublobar resection (SL) and lobectomy (L) on quality of life (QoL) during the first postoperative year. Methods We used a prospective cohort of Stage IA lung cancer patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) from the Initiative for Early Lung Cancer Research on Treatment. QoL was measured before surgery, and within 4, 6, and 12 months post-surgery using three validated instruments: SF-12 [physical (PCS) and mental health (MCS)], FACT-LCS (lung-cancer-symptoms), and the PHQ-4 (anxiety and depression subscales). Locally weighted smoothing curve (LOWESS) was fitted to identify the best interval knot for the change in the QoL trend post-surgery. After adjusting for demographic and clinical variables, an adjusted piecewise linear mixed effects model was developed to estimate differences in baseline and 12-month scores, and rates of change for each QoL measure. Results SL resection was performed in 127 (63.2%) and L in 74 (36.8%) patients. LOWESS plots suggested that the shift of QoL (interval knot) was at 2 months post-surgery. Decreases in PCS scores were less severe for SL than L patients 2 months post-surgery (-0.18 vs. -2.30, P=0.02); while subsequent improvements were observed for both groups (SL: +0.29 vs. L: +0.74, P=0.06). SL patients reported significantly better scores a year post-surgery compared to baseline (P=0.003), while L patients did not. Anxiety decreased at similar rates for both SL and L patients within 2 months post-surgery (P=0.18), then stabilized for the remaining months. MCS and depression scores remained stable in both groups throughout. QoL scores were lower for women than for men, but only significantly worse for the lung-cancer-symptoms (P=0.003) and anxiety (P=0.04). Conclusions SL patients fared better in physical health and lung cancer symptoms than L patients. The first two postoperative months showed the most significant change which suggests targeting postoperative intervention during that time.

Background This study aimed to investigate whether sublobar resection (SR) is equivalent to lobectomy for small (≤ 2 cm) second primary lung cancer (SPLC). Methods We identified 834 patients with T1aN0M0 SPLC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database during 2000-2016. Overall survival (OS) was compared between lobectomy and SR after propensity-score matching. A total of 228 patients with SPLC were identified from three institutions in China as the validation set. Results SR was an independent risk factor for patients with 1 to 2 cm SPLC (SR vs Lob: hazard ratio [HR], 1.593; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.186-2.141; P = .002) but not for patients with SPLC ≤ 1 cm (SR vs Lob: HR, 1.206; 95% CI, 0.790-1.841; P = .385). Subgroup analysis on the SEER data indicated that OS favored lobectomy compared with SR for contralateral SPLC ≤ 2 cm but not for ipsilateral ones (ipsilateral: P = .692; contralateral: P = .030). Our multi-institutional data also revealed that SR was equivalent to lobectomy for patients with ≤2 cm ipsilateral SPLC. Conclusions SR is equivalent to lobectomy for SPLC ≤ 1 cm but not for SPLC > 1 to 2 cm. SR might be recommended for patients with ipsilateral small SPLC considering the difficulty in reoperations.

Background Lymphadenectomy is an important part of surgical treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the prognostic impact of lymph node (LN) dissection for patients with NSCLC ≤1 and >1 to 2 cm who underwent sublobar resection is still unclear. Methods A group of patients numbering 7,627 with NSCLC 2 cm or less who underwent sublobar resection were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between January 2010 and November 2015. The overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) were evaluated among patients who had undergone dissection of ≥4 LNs, 1 to 3 LNs or who had no-LN dissection; log-rank and Cox proportional-hazards regression analyses were used for the evaluation. Results Patients with NSCLC ≤2 cm who underwent ≥4 LNs dissection had better OS and LCSS compared with those who underwent dissection of 1 to 3 LNs or who had no-LN dissection after sublobar resection. Subgroup analysis showed that dissection of ≥4 LNs had better OS and LCSS than those of 1 to 3 LNs dissection in NSCLC >1 to 2 cm, whereas had similar OS and LCSS in NSCLC ≤1 cm. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that dissection of 1 to 3 LNs was not an independent risk factor of OS and LCSS than dissection of ≥4 LNs in NSCLC ≤1 cm after sublobar resection. Conclusions The extent of LN dissection is associated with the survival outcomes in patients with NSCLC ≤2 cm after sublobar resection. Dissection of ≥4 LNs should be recommended for NSCLC >1 to 2 cm, whereas surgeons can rely on surgical skills and patient profiles to decide ≥4 LNs or 1 to 3 LNs dissection for NSCLC ≤1 cm during sublobar resection.

The standard surgical treatment of NSCLC remains lobectomy combined with lymph node (LN) dissection (LND), even for early stage tumors (1). However, there is a growing interest in sublobar resections (SLR), even in patients who can tolerate a lobectomy, as reflected by the increasing number of publications referenced in PubMed (2) as well as changing practices. Thus, in our department, the average rate of SLR varies between 25 and 35% (3). Trials comparing lobectomy and RSL are underway (4–6) and the favorable results of the JCOG-0802 study has recently been announced (publication pending at the time of writing this article). Until now, the published survival results of SLR have been less satisfactory than those of lobectomies. For several years, after the publication of the Lung Cancer Study Group comparing lobectomies and SLR, which showed poor results on local recurrence and survival, lobectomy has been considered the gold standard treatment (7). Subsequent cohort studies have confirmed this attitude. In particular, the SEER database study of over 14,000 patients with NSCLC demonstrated significantly better survival after lobectomy, regardless of tumor size (8). Surgeons have until now considered lobectomy to be the standard treatment for NSCLC–apart from cases requiring pneumonectomy for location reasons–not only because of the above-mentioned findings, but also to apply the recommendations and with the consideration that a lobectomy provides satisfactory safety margins and allows removal of the lymphatic networks and intralobar nodes. Several years ago, the presence of invaded interlobar nodes led to the extension of the resection to pneumonectomy. The poor oncological benefit and the high morbidity and mortality of pneumonectomies have led to abandon this dogma. However, many recent monocentric studies have demonstrated the non-inferiority, or even a slight superiority of SLR over lobectomies for early-stage NSCLC (9–13). Currently, more and more teams are performing SLR for selected early-stage tumors. Presumably, they apply, or should apply, the same oncological rules as for lobectomies, which have been clearly defined (14–16), i.e., performing a macroscopically complete resection with free margins and a systematic lymph node dissection, according to the guidelines (14). One of the questions is therefore why intersegmental LN dissection and analysis of the resection margins are not routinely performed during SLR for cancer. The latter point is not the subject of this article and we will focus here on lymph node dissection during SLR. The reasons for the possible inferiority of SLR compared to lobectomy, at least in some cohort studies, are the following (and these reasons can be correlated): (1) some SLRs are actually wedge resections, (2) insufficient resection margins, (3) low number of nodes being examined, (4) absence of analysis of the so-called “adjacent” nodes and (5) non-practice of frozen section on margins and on the segmental nodes, which does not allow for extension to lobectomy during the procedure (Positivity nodes on final pathological examination rarely leads to a reoperation). All in all, as emphasized by P. Thomas, lymph node dissection might be the key point in performing a “radical segmentectomy” (17). In this article, we will look at the four areas of concern and end-up with proposals.

Imaging findings after thoracic surgery can be misleading. Knowledge of the normal post-operative anatomy helps the radiologist to recognise life-threatening complications and conversely not to wrongly evoke a complication in cases of trivial post-operative abnormalities. In this educational article, we reviewed the expected patterns after thoracic surgery including sublobar resection, lobectomy, pneumonectomy and related techniques. Imaging aspects of frequent and less common complications and their typical imaging features are then presented.

Background Repeat pulmonary resection is widely accepted in clinical practice. This study aimed to compare sublobar resection (segmentectomy or wedge resection) with lobectomy in the treatment of patients who underwent a second pulmonary resection. Methods This study retrospectively included patients who underwent lobectomy or sublobar resection for second pulmonary resection. 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance selection bias. Clinicopathological features, perioperative and survival outcomes of lobectomy and sublobar resection were compared. Results A total of 308 patients who underwent second pulmonary resection were identified: 71 (23.1%) who underwent lobectomy and 237 (76.9%) who underwent sublobar resection. After PSM, 58 patients for each group were selected with well‐balanced clinicopathological characteristics. In patients who underwent sublobar resection, significantly shorter chest tube duration (days) (median, 4 vs. 2, p, Lobectomy does not show advantages in perioperative and survival outcomes for second pulmonary resection compared with sublobar resection. For high‐risk patients unable to tolerate lobectomy, sublobar resection might be an alternative treatment option.

Yendamuri et al. published an important work in the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery in July 2018 on the effects of the number of resected lymph nodes (LNs) on the survival of patients with small-sized (≤2 cm) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent sublobar resection (1). This retrospective analysis was based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database in the United States with more than 3,900 cases (study period: 2004–2013).

Background The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of primary treatment with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) versus sublobar resection (SLR) for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients with medical comorbidities. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent SBRT (n = 106) or SLR (100 wedge resection, 41 segmentectomy) because of medical comorbidities associated with stage I NSCLC were enrolled. Lesions located in the outer third of the lung field on computed tomography were defined as external, and others were defined as internal. A propensity score–matched analysis was also performed that compared SBRT and SLR results. Charts were reviewed to determine local tumor recurrence, disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS). Results A propensity score–matched analysis, recurrence-free survival (RFS) became significant in favor of surgery (p = 0.036). For large nodules of greater than 2.0 cm in diameter, RFS was significantly better in the surgery group (p = 0.042). No significant differences in OS, DSS, or RFS were observed with small nodules of less than 2.0 cm in diameter. In the external group, a higher recurrence rate was seen for SBRT group. For internal group, there was no statistical difference between each treatment. Local recurrence rate was higher in the SBRT group (p = 0.0082) in the external group. Conclusions In a matched comparison of stage I NSCLC in patients with medical comorbidities, RFS was in favor of surgery comparing SBRT, but there were no significant differences in OS or DSS. The tumor size and tumor location should be considered before deciding whether to perform SBRT or surgery.

This study aimed to clarify differences in the prognostic impact of tumor spread through air spaces (STAS) in lobectomy versus sublobar resection (SR). The study also investigated the frequency and significance of STAS in residual lung segments. This study identified 752 patients with p-stage 1A non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from 2010 to 2012. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared. For proactive simulation of SR, 100 consecutive lobectomy specimens of p-stage 1A NSCLC were selected. The study found STAS in 182 (28.7%) of 634 lobectomy cases and 43 (36.4%) of 118 SR cases. Multivariable analysis showed that STAS was not a prognostic factor in the lobectomy group, but showed a significantly worse prognostic effect for the SR group (RFS, P

This report describes the surgical management of a male patient with early-stage lung cancer who underwent thoracoscopic completion right lower lobectomy after previously undergoing sublobar resection for multifocal ground glass nodules of the lung. Perioperative considerations associated with the management of dense pulmonary hilar adhesions and the techniques used are discussed.

Introduction Spread through air spaces (STAS) is a form of invasion wherein tumor cells extend beyond the tumor edge within the lung parenchyma. In lung adenocarcinoma (ADC), we investigated the (1) association between STAS and procedure-specific outcomes (sublobar resection and lobectomy), (2) effect of surgical margin-to-tumor diameter ratio in STAS-positive patients, and (3) potential utility of frozen sections (FSs) for detecting STAS intraoperatively. Methods We investigated 1497 patients who underwent lobectomy (n = 970) or sublobar resection (n = 527) for T1N0M0 lung ADC after propensity score matching. Outcomes were analyzed by using a competing risks approach. The effect of margin-to-tumor ratio on recurrence pattern (locoregional and distant) was investigated in patients who underwent sublobar resection. Five pathologists evaluated the feasibility of intraoperatively identifying STAS by using FSs (sensitivity, specificity, and interrater reliability). Results On multivariable analysis after propensity score matching (349 pairs/procedure), sublobar resection was significantly associated with recurrence (subhazard ratio = 2.84 [p Conclusions In patients with T1 lung ADC with STAS, lobectomy was associated with better outcomes than sublobar resection was. Pathologists can recognize STAS on FSs.

Introduction This work was performed to develop and validate procedure-specific risk prediction for recurrence following resection for early-stage lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) and investigate risk prediction utility in identifying patients who may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT). Methods In patients who underwent resection for small (≤2 cm) lung ADC (lobectomy, 557; sublobar resection, 352), an association between clinicopathologic variables and risk of recurrence was assessed by a competing risks approach. Procedure-specific risk prediction was developed based on multivariable regression for recurrence. External validation was conducted using cohorts (N = 708) from Japan, Taiwan, and Germany. The accuracy of risk prediction was measured using a concordance index. We applied the lobectomy risk prediction approach to a propensity score–matched cohort of patients with stage II-III disease (n = 316, after matching) with or without ACT and compared lung cancer–specific survival between groups among low- or high-risk scores. Results Micropapillary pattern, solid pattern, lymphovascular invasion, and necrosis were involved in the risk prediction following lobectomy, and micropapillary pattern, spread through air spaces, lymphovascular invasion, and necrosis following sublobar resection. Both internal and external validation showed good discrimination (concordance index in lobectomy and sublobar resection: internal, 0.77 and 0.75, respectively; and external, 0.73 and 0.79, respectively). In the stage II-III propensity score–matched cohort, among high-risk patients, ACT significantly reduced the risk of lung cancer–specific death (subhazard ratio 0.43, p = 0.001), but not among low-risk patients. Conclusions Procedure-specific risk prediction for patients with resected small lung ADC can be used to better prognosticate and stratify patients for further interventions.

Heli Yang,1 Xiangdong Li,2 Jialun Shi,2 Hao Fu,1 Hao Yang,2 Zhen Liang,1 Hongchao Xiong,1 Hui Wang3 1Department of Thoracic Surgery I, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Haidian, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, Shanxi, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, People’s Republic of China Introduction: This study aimed to develop a practical nomogram to predict prognosis in patients who are undergoing sublobar resection for stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases were used to construct the nomogram. Methods: Data from patients undergoing sublobar resection for stage IA NSCLC diagnosed between 2004 and 2014 were extracted from the SEER database. Factors that may predict the outcome were identified using the Kaplan–Meier method and the Cox proportional-hazards model. A nomogram was constructed to predict the 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) rates of these patients. The predictive accuracy of the nomogram was measured using the concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve. Results: A total of 4,866 patients were selected for this study. Using univariate and multivariate analyses, eight independent prognostic factors associated with OS were identified, including sex (P

Background: Bilateral synchronous multiple primary lung adenocarcinoma (BSMPLA) is a rapidly increasing disease for which timely and accurate treatment is required. We describe our experience which we hope to establish optimal therapeutic options for patients with BSMPLA. Methods: This study aimed to explore the feasibility and safety of simultaneous bilateral video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in 56 patients who received histological diagnoses of BSMPLA at our hospital between January 2016 and January 2018. In this retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes, we observed no serious postoperative complications or perioperative death. Results: Four and 28 patients respectively underwent bilateral lobectomy and lobectomy with contralateral sublobar resection, whereas the remaining 24 patients underwent bilateral sublobar resection. Sublobar resection means anatomical segmentectomy or wedge resection. The mean postoperative hospital stay duration was 5.39±2.67 days. Postoperative complications comprising persistent air leakage for more than 5 days was observed in 8 (14.2%) of 56 patients. No severe postoperative complications or deaths occurred. Conclusions: Our results suggest that simultaneous bilateral VATS is feasible, safe, and reproducible. This therapeutic strategy appears to confer considerable benefits on patients with BSMPLA.

Background: Timing for intervention of small indeterminate pulmonary nodules has long been a topic of debate given the low incidence of malignancy and difficulty in obtaining a definite preoperative diagnosis. We sought to determine survival outcomes of surgical and non-surgical managements in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) ≤8 mm, which may provide a reference for prospective decision-making for patients with suspected NSCLC.Method: A total of 1,652 patients with Stage IA NSCLC ≤8 mm were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and categorized into surgery and non-surgery groups. Chi-square test, t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare the baseline characteristics between groups. Survival curves were depicted using Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard model was used for univariate and multivariate analyses. Adjustment of confounding factors between groups was performed by propensity score matching.Results: The surgery and non-surgery groups included 1,438 and 208 patients, respectively. Patients in surgery group demonstrated superior survival outcome than patients in non-surgery group both before [overall survival (OS): HR, 16.22; 95% CI, 11.48–22.91, p < 0.001; cancer-specific survival (CSS): HR, 49.6; 95% CI, 31.09–79.11, p < 0.001] and after (OS: HR, 3.12; 95% CI, 2.40–4.05, p < 0.001; CSS: HR, 3.85; 95% CI, 2.74–5.40, p < 0.001) propensity score matching. The 30-day mortality rates were 3.1 and 12.0% in surgery and non-surgery groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis suggested age, sex, race, tumor size, grade, pathological stage were all independent prognostic factors in patients with ≤8 mm NSCLC. A comparison of surgical resections revealed a survival superiority of lobectomy over sub-lobectomy. In terms of CSS, no statistically significant difference was found between segmentectomy and wedge resection.Conclusion: The current SEER database showed better prognosis of surgical resection than non-surgical treatment in patients with ≤8 mm NSCLC. However, the factors that should be essentially included in the proper propensity-matched analysis, such as comorbidity, cardiopulmonary function and performance status were unavailable and the true superiority or inferiority should be examined further by ongoing randomized trial, especially comparing surgery and stereotactic body irradiation.

Objective The use of segmentectomy for peripheral T ≤2 cm, N0 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has increased in the last decade. We sought to compare clinical outcomes and overall survival between robotic, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), and open segmentectomy. Methods The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with clinical T ≤2 cm, N0 NSCLC who underwent segmentectomy via robotic, thoracoscopic (VATS), and open approaches (2010 to 2015). Univariate and Cox regression analyses were used to compare surgical approaches and to evaluate predictors of overall survival. Statistical analyses were done using SPSS Version 21.0. Results Segmentectomy was performed in 3,888 patients during the study period with 406 robotic, 1,837 VATS, and 1,645 open patients. VATS and robotic segmentectomy were performed more often at academic or comprehensive community cancer programs as compared to community programs ( P < 0.05). Conversion to open thoracotomy was similar between robotic and VATS groups when stratified by hospital volume. Lymph node yield was significantly higher for robotic (median = 6), compared to VATS (median = 5) or open (median = 4; P < 0.001). Length of stay was decreased for robotic versus open ( P < 0.01). No differences in 30-day readmissions ( P = 0.12) were observed among the 3 modalities. Overall survival was similar among groups ( P = 0.18). Conclusions Robotic segmentectomy provides similar clinical outcomes compared to other standardized approaches for clinical T ≤2 cm, N0 NSCLC. A higher lymph node yield in robotic segmentectomy was not associated with improved survival in this study population.

Background: Due to the low incidence of pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC), the survival analysis for comparing lobectomy and sublobar resection (SLR) for stage IA LCNEC remains scarce. Methods: Patients diagnosed with pathological stage IA LCNEC between 1998 and 2016 were extracted from the Survenillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The oncological outcomes were cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox multivariate analysis were used to identify the independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS. Furthermore, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed between SLR and lobectomy to adjust the confounding factors. Results: A total of 308 patients with stage IA LCNEC met the inclusion criteria: 229 patients (74.4%) received lobectomy and 79 patients (25.6%) received SLR. Patients who underwent SLR were older (PConclusions: Although SLR is not inferior to lobectomy in terms of oncological outcomes for patients with stage IA LCNEC, more lymph nodes can be dissected or sampled during lobectomy. Lobectomy should be considered as a standard procedure for patients with early-stage LCNEC who are able to withstand lobectomy.

OBJECTIVES Segmentectomies can be classified as simple or complex and are increasingly performed for early-stage lung cancer. Complex segmentectomy requires the creation of multiple intersegmental planes and is considered a more arduous procedure with higher risks of postoperative complications, relative to simple segmentectomy. METHODS This retrospective study evaluated patients who underwent simple or complex segmentectomy for primary lung cancer during 2012–2018. Perioperative factors were compared according to the procedure type. RESULTS The 538 eligible segmentectomies included 251 complex segmentectomies and 287 simple segmentectomies. There were no significant differences in terms of age, sex, smoking history or comorbidities. The most common procedure in the complex segmentectomy group was upper-lobe segmentectomy (e.g. S1, S2, S3 and S1 + 2; n = 170), which was followed by S8 segmentectomy (n = 39) and two-segment segmentectomies (e.g. S7 + 8, S8 + 9 and S9 + 10; n = 24). Simple segmentectomies involved left upper division (n = 117), the lingular segment (n = 30) and the S6 segment (n = 140). Comparing complex and simple segmentectomies revealed equivalent median operative times (113 vs 113 min) and blood loss (20 vs 20 ml). Complex segmentectomy had fewer postoperative complications (2.0% vs 7.0%, P = 0.006), including prolonged air leak (0.8% vs 3.5%, P = 0.035) and shorter median postoperative stays (3 vs 4 days, P CONCLUSIONS The perioperative outcomes of complex segmentectomy were satisfactory and comparable to those of simple segmentectomy. Surgeons should pay careful attention to the surgical margins during complex segmentectomy.

Background To investigate the comparative effectiveness of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and sublobar resection (SLR) in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) considered to be high-risk lobectomy patients. Methods From January 2012 to December 2015, patients who underwent SBRT or SLR for clinical stage I NSCLC were examined retrospectively. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce selection bias in SBRT and SLR patients. Results Data from 86 SBRT and 79 SLR patients was collected. Median follow-up periods of the SBRT and SLR groups were 32 and 37 months, respectively. Patients treated with SBRT exhibited significantly higher age, higher likelihood of being male, larger tumor diameter, lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), and poorer performance status compared with SLR patients. There were no significant differences between SBRT and SLR patients for 3-year overall survival (OS) (80.3% and 82.3%, P=0.405), cause-specific survival (CSS) (81.3% and 83.4%, P=0.383), and local control (LC) (89.7% and 86.0%, P=0.501). Forty-nine patients were identified from each group after performing PSM. After patients were matched for age, gender, performance status, tumor characteristics and pulmonary function, no significant differences were observed in 3-year OS (85.4% and 73.3%, P=0.649), CSS (87.2% and 74.9%, P=0.637) and LC (95.6% and 82.1%, P=0.055). Prevalence of significant adverse events (grade 3 or worse) was 0% and 10.2% in the matched SBRT and SLR groups (P=0.056), respectively. Conclusions Disease control and survival in the SBRT patients was equivalent to that seen in SLR patients with stage I NSCLC considered high-risk lobectomy candidates. SBRT could therefore be an alternative option to SLR in treating patients with a high operative risk.

Current guidelines recommend anatomic lung resection of typical bronchopulmonary carcinoids. Typical carcinoid tumors have excellent prognosis and sublobar resection has been associated with noninferior long-term survival. It's unclear whether wedge resection is acceptable for small typical carcinoid tumors. We hypothesize there is no difference in survival between wedge resection and segmentectomy for Stage I typical bronchopulmonary carcinoid tumors. Using the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2016, we identified clinical T1N0M0 typical bronchopulmonary carcinoid tumors by wedge resection or segmentectomy. Short-term outcomes included length of stay, lymph nodes evaluated, pathologic node status, positive margin status, and 90-day mortality. Primary outcome was overall survival and estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. 821 patients were identified: 677 receiving wedge resection, 144 receiving segmentectomy. Segmentectomy was more commonly performed in an academic setting (70.0% vs 57.3%, P = 0.005). The mean tumor size for segmentectomy was 1.7 cm versus 1.4 cm for wedge resection (P0.001). There was no difference in LOS, positive margin status, and 90-day mortality between groups. There were significantly more lymph nodes evaluated in segmentectomy patients (median 4 vs 0, P0.001), but there was no difference in positive lymph node status (5.3% vs 2.6%, P = 0.165). The OS was similar between wedge and segmental resection (P = 0.613): 3-year survival (93.5% vs 92.8%) and 5-year survival (83.8% vs 84.9%). Wedge resection and segmentectomy have similar survival for Stage I typical bronchopulmonary carcinoids in a large national database. This analysis suggests nonanatomic, parenchymal-sparing resection should be considered an appropriate alternative for Stage I typical bronchopulmonary carcinoids.

BACKGROUND: Repeated assessment of patient recovery after discharge is challenging. This study used a popular messenger application to remotely collect patient self-reported symptoms and their severity so as to monitor patient recovery and identify the factors affecting the recovery of symptoms following lung cancer surgery. METHODS: This prospective observational study was conducted at a single tertiary lung cancer center in China between November 2018 and June 2019. Participants received demonstration videos and repeated symptom surveys regarding pain and cough severity (assessed using numeric rating scores of 0–10 for pain and 0–6 for cough) at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 weeks after discharge via a smartphone program bound to the WeChat application. Patients who responded to at least 3 of the 5 post-discharge surveys were included in this study. The data were analyzed to investigate the symptom recovery and its related factors. RESULTS: Of the 826 patients enrolled, 589 (71.3%) responded to at least three surveys. The average pain score reduced from 4.1±2.5 at 2 weeks to 2.2±2.0 at 12 weeks (P90 minutes), and prolonged chest tube drainage (>7 days). The average cough score decreased from 2.34±1.30 at 2 weeks to 1.93±1.26 at 12 weeks (P90 min) were related to increased cough severity. Sublobar resection and limited lymphadenectomy may contribute to lower cough severity post-surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The messenger application-based remote monitoring successfully collected post-discharge symptom information and identified factors associated with recovery following lung surgery.

Previous studies have reported the feasibility and efficacy of thoracoscopic anatomical sublobar resection under three-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT) simulation; however, its long-term outcomes have not been clearly established in primary lung cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of this technique. We retrospectively reviewed data from 112 consecutive patients with selected clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent thoracoscopic anatomical sublobar resection from 2004 to 2014. This procedure was planned using preoperative 3DCT simulation to ensure sufficient surgical margins and enabled tailor-made surgery for each patient. Patients who had predominantly ground glass opacity lung cancers underwent anatomical sublobar resection as a curative-intent resection. Other patients who were high-risk candidates for lobectomy underwent anatomical sublobar resection as a compromised limited resection. Of the 112 cases, 82 had a curative-intent resection, while 30 had a compromised limited resection. Recurrence occurred in only 2 cases (1.8%), both of which were in the compromised limited group. A second primary lung cancer was observed in 5 cases (4.5%). Of the 5 patients, 4 underwent surgery for a second cancer and had no recurrence. The 5-year overall survival, lung cancer-specific overall survival, and recurrence-free survival rates were 92.5%, 100%, and 98.2%, respectively, for all cases; 97.6%, 100%, and 100%, respectively, in the curative-intent group; and 75.8%, 100% and 92.6%, respectively, in the compromised limited group. Thoracoscopic anatomical sublobar resection under 3DCT simulation may be an acceptable alternative treatment in selected patients with NSCLC. Clinical registration number: IRB No. 2020-98 (Dated: 2020.6.30).

Objective: this study analyses long-term results of sublobar resection in daily clinical activity versus the standard procedure (lobectomy). Method: From a prospective database, patients treated with sublobar resection for NSCLC were identified (2007-2017). None of them had malignant disease in the 5 previous years nor induction treatment. Log-rank test was used to compare overall survival and disease free survival. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed for age, sex, stage, and comorbities to reduce bias selection. Results: 1214 patients were surgically treated for lung cancer in that period of time. Finally, 52 patients were included in sublobar group with following resections: pulmonary wedge 37(71.2%) cases; anatomic segmentectomy 15(28.8%) cases. Women 4(7.7%); Men 48(92.3%). Mean age: 68.6 y.o. (range 42-86). Pulmonary function test (FEV1 64.9% vs 77.3% p=0.004) and tumoral size (1.9cm vs 3.0cm p