Search

Human germinal center–associated lymphoma (HGAL) is an adaptor protein specifically expressed in germinal center lymphocytes. High expression of HGAL is a predictor of prolonged survival of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and classic Hodgkin lymphoma. Furthermore, HGAL expression is associated with early-stage DLBCL, thus potentially limiting lymphoma dissemination. In our previous studies, we demonstrated that HGAL regulates B-cell receptor signaling and cell motility in vitro and deciphered some molecular mechanisms underlying these effects. By using novel animal models for in vivo DLBCL dispersion, we demonstrate here that HGAL decreases lymphoma dissemination and prolongs survival. Furthermore, by using an unbiased proteomic approach, we demonstrate that HGAL may interact with multiple cytoskeletal proteins thereby implicating a multiplicity of effects in regulating lymphoma motility and spread. Specifically, we show that HGAL interacts with tubulin, and this interaction may also contribute to HGAL effects on cell motility. These findings recapitulate previous observations in humans, establish the role of HGAL in dissemination of lymphoma in vivo, and explain improved survival of patients with HGAL-expressing lymphomas.

In metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, ESR1 mutations are a common cause of acquired resistance to the backbone of therapy, estrogen deprivation by aromatase inhibition. How these mutations affect tumor sensitivity to established and novel therapies are active areas of research. These therapies include estrogen receptor-targeting agents, such as selective estrogen receptor modulators, covalent antagonists, and degraders (including tamoxifen, fulvestrant, and novel agents), and combination therapies, such as endocrine therapy plus CDK4/6, PI3K, or mTORC1 inhibition. In this review, we summarize existing knowledge surrounding the mechanisms of action of ESR1 mutations and roles in resistance to aromatase inhibition. We then analyze the recent literature on how ESR1 mutations affect outcomes in estrogen receptor-targeting and combination therapies. For estrogen receptor-targeting therapies such as tamoxifen and fulvestrant, ESR1 mutations cause relative resistance in vitro but do not clearly lead to resistance in patients, making novel agents in this category promising. Regarding combination therapies, ESR1 mutations nullify any aromatase inhibitor component of the combination. Thus, combinations using endocrine alternatives to aromatase inhibition, or combinations where the non-endocrine component is efficacious as monotherapy, are still effective against ESR1 mutations. These results emphasize the importance of investigating combinatorial resistance, challenging as these efforts are. We also discuss future directions and open questions, such as studying the differences among distinct ESR1 mutations, asking how to adjust clinical decisions based on molecular surveillance testing, and developing novel therapies that are effective against ESR1 mutations.

Background: CDK4/6 inhibitors have emerged as the standard of care for HR+ MBC. However, there is limited insight into the potential benefit of abemaciclib following prior progression on palbociclib or ribociclib. Based on a multi-center cohort of patients with HR+ MBC who had received abemaciclib after prior palbociclib progression (Wander SA et al ASCO 2019), we have previously reported that abemaciclib after prior CDK4/6i progression was well tolerated and that a subset of patients derived durable clinical benefit. Identifying molecular predictors of sensitivity to abemaciclib after prior CDK4/6i progression constitutes an important area of research. Given the high frequency of ESR1 mutations in HR+ MBC with antiestrogen resistance, we evaluated the translational impact of ESR1 mutations in mediating response to abemaciclib in this setting. Methods: To evaluate abemaciclib sensitivity in ESR1 mutant cell lines, T47D HR+ breast cancer cells were modified to over-express multiple mutant ESR1 isoforms via lentiviral infection and antibiotic selection. These isoforms included ESR1 Y537S, Y537N, and D538G. In an additional T47D cell line, RB1 expression was knocked down via CRISPR. The resulting derivative cell lines were grown in the absence of estrogen (via charcoal-stripped serum, CSS) or in escalating doses of abemaciclib. Cell viability was measured via cell-titer-glo assay. For clinical validation, we identified patients with MBC who had ESR1 mutations detected by targeted sequencing of cell-free DNA (cfDNA), via CLIA certified Guardant assay, and had abemaciclib exposure following prior progression on palbociclib or ribociclib in the existing multi-center cohort from six US institutions. Results: All ESR1 mutant derivative cells demonstrated enhanced growth in estrogen deprivation compared to GFP controls, as expected, and were similarly sensitive to escalating doses of abemaciclib monotherapy in vitro, suggesting that ESR1 mutations do not confer resistance to abemaciclib. Interestingly, two patients with ESR1 mutations (in the absence of concurrent driver alterations in RB1, FGFR, CCNE2, and ERBB2) demonstrated progression on palbociclib and sensitivity to abemaciclib. In one patient, cfDNA obtained prior to palbociclib and fulvestrant exposure failed to reveal any ESR1 alteration. Following progression on palbociclib, and prior to sequential exposure to abemaciclib, an ESR1 Y537N alteration was identified. The patient went on to receive 16 months of abemaciclib monotherapy. In a second patient, an ESR1 D538G alteration was identified following progression on palbociclib and fulvestrant. The patient had several intervening regimens, and subsequently went on to receive abemaciclib and fulvestrant for 16 months. RB1-null T47D cells were resistant to abemaciclib monotherapy in vitro, as expected and, in the clinical dataset, the presence of alterations in previously identified genomic mediators of CDK4/6i resistance, such as RB1, were associated with progression on both palbociclib and abemaciclib. Conclusions: HR+ breast cancer cells expressing mutant ESR1 isoforms were resistant to estrogen deprivation but retained sensitivity to abemaciclib in vitro. Furthermore, patients harboring ESR1 mutations via targeted sequencing of cfDNA, in the absence of other known mediators of CDK4/6i resistance, were shown to derive clinical benefit from abemaciclib following prior progression on palbociclib. These results suggest that patients with HR+ MBC, ESR1 mutation, and clinical resistance to anti-estrogen treatment and palbociclib may be candidates for abemaciclib treatment. Further research is warranted to confirm these novel translational observations. Citation Format: Seth A. Wander, Hyo S. Han, Gabriela N. Johnson, Maxwell R. Lloyd, Pingping Mao, Utthara Nayar, Kailey Kowalski, Casey R. Stein, Veronica Mariotti, Leslie SL Kim, Maren Levin, Jing Xi, Apurva Pandey, Siobhan Dunne, Azadeh Nasrazadani, Adam Brufsky, Kevin Kalinsky, Cynthia X Ma, Joyce O’Shaughnessy, Nikhil Wagle, Aditya Bardia. Esr1 mutation as a potential predictor of abemaciclib benefit following prior cdk4/6 inhibitor (cdk4/6i) progression in hormone receptor-positive (hr+) metastatic breast cancer (mbc): A translational investigation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-10.

Purpose: Plasma genotyping may identify mutations in potentially “actionable” cancer genes, such as BRCA1/2, but their clinical significance is not well-defined. We evaluated the characteristics of somatically acquired BRCA1/2 mutations in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Experimental Design: Patients with MBC undergoing routine cell-free DNA (cfDNA) next-generation sequencing (73-gene panel) before starting a new therapy were included. Somatic BRCA1/2 mutations were classified as known germline pathogenic mutations or novel variants, and linked to clinicopathologic characteristics. The effect of the PARP inhibitor, olaparib, was assessed in vitro, using cultured circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from a patient with a somatically acquired BRCA1 mutation and a second patient with an acquired BRCA2 mutation. Results: Among 215 patients with MBC, 29 (13.5%) had somatic cfDNA BRCA1/2 mutations [nine (4%) known germline pathogenic and rest (9%) novel variants]. Known germline pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations were common in younger patients (P = 0.008), those with triple-negative disease (P = 0.022), and they were more likely to be protein-truncating alterations and be associated with TP53 mutations. Functional analysis of a CTC culture harboring a somatic BRCA1 mutation demonstrated high sensitivity to PARP inhibition, while another CTC culture harboring a somatic BRCA2 mutation showed no differential sensitivity. Across the entire cohort, APOBEC mutational signatures (COSMIC Signatures 2 and 13) and the “BRCA” mutational signature (COSMIC Signature 3) were present in BRCA1/2-mutant and wild-type cases, demonstrating the high mutational burden associated with advanced MBC. Conclusions: Somatic BRCA1/2 mutations are readily detectable in MBC by cfDNA analysis, and may be present as both known germline pathogenic and novel variants.

Mechanisms driving resistance to cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in hormone receptor–positive (HR+) breast cancer have not been clearly defined. Whole-exome sequencing of 59 tumors with CDK4/6i exposure revealed multiple candidate resistance mechanisms including RB1 loss, activating alterations in AKT1, RAS, AURKA, CCNE2, ERBB2, and FGFR2, and loss of estrogen receptor expression. In vitro experiments confirmed that these alterations conferred CDK4/6i resistance. Cancer cells cultured to resistance with CDK4/6i also acquired RB1, KRAS, AURKA, or CCNE2 alterations, which conferred sensitivity to AURKA, ERK, or CHEK1 inhibition. Three of these activating alterations—in AKT1, RAS, and AURKA—have not, to our knowledge, been previously demonstrated as mechanisms of resistance to CDK4/6i in breast cancer preclinically or in patient samples. Together, these eight mechanisms were present in 66% of resistant tumors profiled and may define therapeutic opportunities in patients.Significance:We identified eight distinct mechanisms of resistance to CDK4/6i present in 66% of resistant tumors profiled. Most of these have a therapeutic strategy to overcome or prevent resistance in these tumors. Taken together, these findings have critical implications related to the potential utility of precision-based approaches to overcome resistance in many patients with HR+ metastatic breast cancer.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1079

Summary The development and approval of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4 and 6 inhibitors for hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer represents a major milestone in cancer therapeutics. Three different oral CDK4/6 inhibitors, palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib, have significantly improved progression-free survival by a number of months when combined with endocrine therapy. More recently, improvement in overall survival has been reported with ribociclib and abemaciclib. The toxicity profile of all three drugs is well described and generally easily manageable with dose reductions when indicated. More myelotoxicity is observed with palbociclib and ribociclib, but more gastrointestinal toxicity is observed with abemaciclib. Emerging data is shedding light on the resistance mechanisms associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors, including cell cycle alterations and activation of upstream tyrosine kinase receptors. A number of clinical trials are exploring several important questions regarding treatment sequencing, combinatorial strategies, and the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings, thereby further expanding and refining the clinical application of CDK4/6 inhibitors for patients with breast cancer.

Background: BM in MBC patients cause significant morbidity and mortality. BRCA1 germline mutations have previously been shown to be associated with an increased risk of developing BM (Lee et al, 2011), with an incidence as high as 15% (Zavitsanos et al, 2016). We previously reported that a subset of MBC patients may have somatic BRCA mutations in the absence of germline BRCA mutations (Vidula N, SABCS, 2017). In this study, we evaluated the incidence and clinical characteristics of BM in MBC patients with somatic BRCA mutations detected by cfDNA. Methods: MBC patients with somatic BRCA1 or 2 mutations detected by cfDNA (Guardant360TM, next generation sequencing, 73 gene panel; mutations classified as somatic by Guardant360TM) with at least 4 months of follow-up post-testing at an academic institution were identified. From this cohort, we identified patients who developed BM post cfDNA testing. A retrospective review of medical records and Guardant360TM reports was conducted to identify demographics, tumor subtype, type of cfDNA BRCA mutation, whether the BRCA mutation was known to be pathogenic, germline BRCA mutation status, mutant allele fraction (MAF), clonality (MAF ratio of BRCA mutation/gene mutation with highest MAF ≥ 0.25 for clonal, and Results: Of 36 MBC patients with somatic BRCA mutations, 9 (25%) developed BM and 27 (75%) did not have BM (non-BM). The median time to development of BM was 6.7 months after cfDNA testing. Of the BM patients, 5 (56%) had triple-negative (TN) and 4 (44%) had hormone receptor positive (HR+)/HER2- MBC in comparison with the non-BM cases where 5 (19%) had TN, 19 (70%) had HR+/HER2-, and 3 (11%) had HER2+ MBC. Very few patients (1 BM and 2 non-BM) had known co-existing separate germline BRCA mutations (rest not known BRCA carriers confirmed by negative germline testing and/or absence of family history suggestive of a germline BRCA phenotype). The median age at MBC diagnosis was similar for BM and non-BM patients (57 years). PIK3CA and TP53 mutations were commonly seen in both BM and non-BM cases. Additionally, MYC, EGFR, and CCNE1 mutations were commonly seen in BM cases. As outlined in Table 1, among patients with BM, the somatic BRCA mutations were commonly BRCA1, clonal, known to be pathogenic (56%), and present at a higher MAF, but these findings did not reach statistical significance possibly due to the small sample size. Brain tumor tissue mutation status in BM patients and correlation with cfDNA results will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: We observed a relatively high incidence (25%) of BM in MBC patients with somatic BRCA mutations detectable by cfDNA, which were often known to be pathogenic mutations (56%), and often associated with co-existing MYC, EGFR, and CCNE1 mutations. Further research using a larger cohort with adequate statistical power is needed to validate these findings, and may help identify MBC patients at risk for BM using a liquid biopsy. Table 1.Characteristic BMNon-BMPrior anthracycline and/or platinum6 (67%)16 (59%)Type of somatic BRCA mutationBRCA16 (67%)11 (41%)BRCA22 (22%)15 (56%)BRCA1 and 21 (11%)1 (4%)Median BRCA MAF0.40.17ClonalityClonal6 (67%)13 (48%)Subclonal3 (33%)14 (52%)Mutation known to be pathogenic5 (56%)7 (26%)Common co-existing mutationsPIK3CA5 (56%)12 (44%)TP535 (56%)15 (56%)MYC5 (56%)8 (30%)EGFR5 (56%)8 (30%)CCNE15 (56%)6 (22%)KIT3 (33%)5 (19%) Citation Format: Neelima Vidula, Andrzej Niemierko, Giuliana Malvarosa, Priscilla Brastianos, Erica Blouch, Kristen Shannon, Steven Isakoff, Seth Wander, Laura Spring, Jerry Younger, Kristin Price, Beverly Moy, Dejan Juric, Leif Ellisen, Aditya Bardia. Brain metastases (BM) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) somatic BRCA mutations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-09-06.

Background: The AKT1 oncogene represents a central node in the well-characterized PI3K/AKT/mTOR signal transduction pathway involved in the regulation of cellular proliferation as well as therapeutic resistance. With the emergence of multiple targeted therapies for HR+ MBC, we sought to explore the prevalence of AKT1 alterations, the spectrum of co-occurring mutations, and any potential impact on response to endocrine-based therapy, including CDK 4/6 and PIK3CA inhibitors. Methods: Presence or absence of AKT1 mutation was interrogated via cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis (Guardant assay) among patients with HR+/HER2- MBC receiving treatment at the Massachusetts General Hospital who underwent routine clinical cfDNA testing. Genomic sequencing results were then compared to detailed clinical annotation based upon retrospective chart review. In the laboratory, HR+/HER2- T47D breast cancer cells were transfected with AKT1, under the control of a doxycycline-inducible promoter, to induce AKT1 overexpression. Sensitivity to escalating doses of fulvestrant and palbociclib were interrogated via cell-titer-glo viability assay in vitro. Results: Among 272 patients with HR+/HER2- MBC, we identified 13 patients with AKT1 mutation (4.7%). 12/13 (92%) patients had a canonical AKT1E17K alteration, one patient (8%) had an AKT1 E49K alteration. AKT1 mutations occurred concurrently with alterations in ESR1 (31%), PIK3CA (23%), TP53 (23%), ERBB2 (15%), and RB1 (8%). All patients had been exposed to some form of anti-estrogen prior to sequencing, either via (neo)adjuvant therapy and/or in the metastatic setting; 5/13 (38%) had exposure to a CDK4/6 inhibitor prior to cfDNA sequencing. Following the identification of an AKT1 alteration, examples of rapid clinical progression on fulvestrant, CDK4/6i, and/or everolimus were identified, however the presence of an AKT1 alteration was not sufficient to predict pan-resistance to these agents, as counter-examples of clinical benefit were also identified. In an index patient with an AKT1 mutation and prior progression on letrozole and palbociclib, subsequent treatment with fulvestrant and abemaciclib did not yield clinical benefit, highlighting the potential role of AKT1 in mediating clinical resistance to endocrine therapy and CDK4/6i. In the pre-clinical model, HR+/HER2- breast cancer cells demonstrated resistance to both fulvestrant and palbociclib following upregulation of exogenous AKT1 expression. Updated clinical data with additional patients and response to regimens incorporating an anti-estrogen, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, an mTOR inhibitor, and/or a PIK3CA inhibitor will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Activating AKT1 mutations can be identified via targeted sequencing of cfDNA in patients with HR+/HER2- MBC, and may play an important role in mediating resistance to anti-estrogens, CDK4/6 inhibitors, and other emerging targeted therapies. Heterogeneity in response to endocrine-based therapy following the identification of an AKT1 alteration may be related to tumor-extrinsic factors, the AKT1 allelic fraction, or cooperativity between multiple resistance drivers. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and guide optimal therapeutic sequencing strategies for patients with HR+/HER2- AKT1 mutant MBC. Citation Format: Seth Wander, Pingping Mao, Maxwell Lloyd, Kailey Kowalski, Gabriela N. Johnson, Giuliana Malvarosa, Beverly Moy, Leif W. Ellisen, John Iafrate, Nikhil Wagle, Aditya Bardia. AKT1 alterations following exposure to endocrine-based therapy in patients with hormone-receptor positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC): Clinical and functional implications [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-10-08.

Background: The cyclin-dependent 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i), in combination with an anti-estrogen, have emerged as the standard of care for patients with HR+/HER2- MBC. While only limited insight exists into the molecular factors that drive progression, emerging evidence suggests that activation of AKT1 may provoke resistance in a subset of patients. Overexpression of AKT1 also conveys resistance in HR+/HER2- breast cancer cells in vitro. AKT1 plays a well-established role in promoting tumor progression and metastasis. Targeting AKT1 following progression on CDK4/6i may provide durable clinical benefit in HR+/HER2- MBC. Trial Design: This is an open-label phase Ib trial with three arms - Arm A includes fulvestrant + ipatasertib and Arm B includes an aromatase inhibitor (AI) + ipatasertib. Arm C includes fulvestrant + ipatasertib + palbociclib. Arm A and B are dose-expansion cohorts while Arm C is a dose-escalation (standard 3+3 design) followed by subsequent dose-expansion. Eligibility Criteria: Key inclusion criteria include the presence of locally advanced/unresectable and metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer; postmenopausal status or pre/peri-menopausal status s/p oophrectomy or GNRH agonist; at least one prior therapy for MBC including any CDK4/6i; adequate performance status (ECOG 0-2); and adequate bone marrow and hepatic function. Stable CNS metastatic disease and up to two prior lines of chemotherapy for MBC are allowed (no limit on number of prior lines of endocrine therapy). Key exclusion criteria include prior use of fulvestrant (for Arm A); any prior intolerable toxicity with CDK4/6i (for Arm C); prior exposure to an AKT inhibitor in any setting; active CNS disease; concurrent use of specific CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers; poorly controlled intercurrent illness; and pregnancy or active child-bearing potential. Specific Aims: The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of ipatasertib in combination with endocrine therapy (aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant) with or without CDK4/6i in patients with HR+/HER2- MBC who have received prior CDK 4/6i. Secondary objectives include assessment of objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and progression free survival (PFS). Exploratory objectives include next generation sequencing of solid tumor biopsies and cfDNA along with immunohistochemical analysis of tumor biopsies to identify genomic and protein-based predictors of response and resistance. Statistical Methods: Arms A and B constitute dose-expansion cohorts to confirm the safety/tolerability of ipatasertib use with anti-estrogens and evaluate preliminary efficacy. A dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate of Present and Target Accrual: Anticipated accrual for Arms A+B will be n=15 (each). Arm C enrollment will be n=15-30 pending establishment of RP2D/MTD prior to dose expansion. Current enrollment n=4, since study activation in May 2019. Citation Format: Seth A. Wander, Dejan Juric, Laura M. Spring, Neelima Vidula, Maureen Beeler, Karleen Habin, Elene Viscosi, Lauren Scarpetti, Elizabeth Tripp, Rachel Hepp, Beverly Moy, Steven J. Isakoff, Leif W. Ellisen, Aditya Bardia. A phase 1b trial to evaluate safety and anti-tumor activity of the AKT inhibitor, ipatasertib, in combination with endocrine therapy with/without CDK 4/6 inhibitor for patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+)/HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) (TAKTIC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-08-01.

Background: The CDK4/6 inhibitors have emerged as standard first- or second-line regimens in combination with an antiestrogen for patients with HR+/HER2- MBC. While these agents convey significant clinical benefit in many patients, intrinsic resistance can occur and, in patients who respond, acquired resistance is unfortunately inevitable. Despite their widespread use, we have limited insight into the molecular mechanisms governing response and resistance to these agents. Methods: Whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed on metastatic tumor biopsies from 58 patients (pts) with HR+/HER2- MBC who received a CDK4/6 inhibitor with or without an antiestrogen at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, including 7 pts with pre/post-exposure biopsy pairs. Among these biopsies, 69.5% were characterized as resistant (intrinsic or acquired) and 30.5% were characterized as sensitive. To validate putative resistance mediators identified in patient samples, HR+/HER2- breast cancer cells were modified via CRISPR knockout or lentiviral overexpression. Sensitivity of these cells to antiestrogens and CDK4/6i was interrogated via cell-titer-glo assay. In parallel, HR+/HER2- breast cancer cells were cultured to resistance in the presence of an escalating dose of CDK4/6i. Derivative cell lines were subjected to western blotting in an effort to interrogate the putative resistance mediators identified in pts. Novel dependencies were identified in these derivative cell lines via treatment with targeted therapeutic agents in vitro. Results: WES of tumors with CDK4/6i exposure revealed candidate mechanisms of resistance including biallelic RB1 disruption (n=4, 10%) and activating events in AKT1 (n=5, 12.5%), RAS (n=4, 10%), aurora kinase A (AURKA, n=11, 27.5%), and cyclin E2 (CCNE2, n=6, 15%). Convergent evolution toward biallelic RB1 disruption was identified in a single patient with one pre- and two post-exposure biopsies, while acquisition of AKT1 mutation and amplification was identified in two separate instances. Knockout of RB1 and overexpression of AKT1, KRAS G12D, AURKA, and CCNE2 provoked CDK4/6i and antiestrogen resistance in vitro. Breast cancer cells cultured to resistance in CDK4/6i demonstrated concordant acquisition of RB1 downregulation, RAS/ERK activation, AURKA overexpression, and CCNE2 overexpression. Derivative resistant cell lines with RB1 loss or AURKA gain demonstrated enhanced sensitivity to a novel AURKA inhibitor (LY3295668), while cells with RAS activation were highly sensitive to ERK inhibition (via LY3214996). CCNE2-overexpressing cells were highly sensitive to prexasertib, a CHEK1 inhibitor. Conclusions: The genomic landscape of resistance to CDK4/6i is heterogeneous with multiple potential mediators that play well-established roles in cell division and oncogenic signal transduction. We present novel mechanisms of clinical resistance including activation of AKT1 and RAS family oncogenes as well as amplification of AURKA and CCNE2. These drivers were able to provoke resistance to CDK4/6i in vitro. Finally, in each case, a novel dependency was identified which is readily translatable into the clinic. These results underscore the potential of next-generation sequencing as a critical tool to enable identification of resistance mediators, while also suggesting that the presence of specific genomic alterations may define new therapeutic opportunities in CDK4/6i-resistant HR+ MBC. Citation Format: Seth A. Wander, Ofir Cohen, Xueqian Gong, Gabriela N. Johnson, Jorge Buendia-Buendia, Maxwell Lloyd, Dewey Kim, Flora Luo, Pingping Mao, Karla Helvie, Kailey Kowalski, Utthara Nayar, Stephen Parsons, Ricardo Martinez, Lacey Litchfield, Xiang Ye, Chun Ping Yu, Valerie Jansen, Levi A. Garraway, Eric P. Winer, Sara M. Tolaney, Nancy U. Lin, Sean Buchanan, Nikhil Wagle. The genomic landscape of intrinsic and acquired resistance to cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD2-09.

PURPOSE Accurate monitoring of therapeutic response remains an important unmet need for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Analysis of tumor genomics obtained via circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can provide a comprehensive overview of tumor evolution. Here, we evaluated ctDNA change as an early prognostic biomarker of subsequent radiologic progression and survival in MBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Paired blood samples from patients with MBC were analyzed for levels of ctDNA, carcinoembryonic antigen, and cancer antigen 15-3 at baseline and during treatment. A Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments–certified sequencing panel of 73 genes was used to quantify tumor-specific point mutations in ctDNA. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the association between ctDNA rise from baseline to during-treatment (genomic progression) and subsequent radiologic progression and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS Somatic mutations were detected in 76 baseline samples (90.5%) and 71 during-treatment samples (84.5%). Patients with genomic progression were more than twice as likely to have subsequent radiologic progression (odds ratio, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.74 to 2.41; P < .0001), with a mean lead time of 5.8 weeks. Genomic assessment provided a high positive predictive value of 81.8% and a negative predictive value of 89.7%. The subset of patients with genomic progression also had shorter PFS (median, 4.2 v 8.3 months; hazard ratio, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.75 to 5.04; log-rank P < .0001) compared with those without genomic progression. CONCLUSION Genomic progression, as assessed by early rise in ctDNA, is an independent biomarker of disease progression before overt radiologic or clinical progression becomes evident in patients with MBC.

The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) have become the standard of care, in combination with antiestrogen therapy, for patients with hormone receptor–positive (HR+)/HER2− advanced breast cancer. Various preclinical and translational research efforts have begun to shed light on the genomic and molecular landscape of resistance to these agents. Drivers of resistance to CDK4/6i therapy can be broadly subdivided into alterations impacting cell-cycle mediators and activation of oncogenic signal transduction pathways. The resistance drivers with the best translational evidence supporting their putative role have been identified via next-generation sequencing of resistant tumor biopsies in the clinic and validated in laboratory models of HR+ breast cancer. Despite the diverse landscape of resistance, several common, therapeutically actionable resistance nodes have been identified, including the mitotic spindle regulator Aurora Kinase A, as well as the AKT and MAPK signaling pathways. Based upon these insights, precision-guided therapeutic strategies are under active clinical development. This review will highlight the emerging evidence, in the clinic and in the laboratory, implicating this diverse spectrum of molecular resistance drivers.

SUMMARY CDK4/6 inhibition is now part of the standard armamentarium for patients with estrogen receptorpositive (ER+) breast cancer, so that defining mechanisms of resistance is a pressing issue. Here, we identify increased CDK6 expression as a key determinant of acquired resistance after palbociclib treatment in ER+ breast cancer cells. CDK6 expression is critical for cellular survival during palbociclib exposure. The increased CDK6 expression observed in resistant cells is dependent on TGF-b pathway suppression via miR-432-5p expression. Exosomal miR-432-5p expression mediates the transfer of the resistance phenotype between neighboring cell populations. Levels of miR-432-5p are higher in primary breast cancers demonstrating CDK4/6 resistance compared to those that are sensitive. These data are Furthermore confirmed in pre-treatment and post-progression biopsies from a parotid cancer patient who had responded to ribociclib, demonstrating the clinical relevance of this mechanism. Finally, the CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance phenotype is reversible in vitro and in vivo by a prolonged drug holiday., Graphical Abstract, In Brief Cornell et al. demonstrate a mechanism of acquired CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance that is independent of inherent genetic mutations, is conferred through extracellular signaling, and is reversible in vitro and in vivo. Resistance was mediated by exosomal miRNA, causing increased expression of CDK6 to overcome G1 arrest and promote cell survival.

Introduction: The advent of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) has transformed the clinical practice of HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer. Palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib have been approved in conjunction with anti-estrogens, while abemaciclib has also been approved as monotherapy based on single agent activity in the MONARCH-1 trial (objective response rate/ORR: 19.7% and median progression-free-survival/PFS = 6.0 months; Dickler M et al CCR 2017). However, there is limited insight into the mechanisms governing resistance to CDK 4/6i and the potential utility of continued CDK4/6i after progression on a prior CDK 4/6i-based therapy. Methods: We evaluated the clinical outcomes of patients with metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer who had received abemaciclib following an initial course of palbociclib-based therapy at our institution. In addition, we conducted genomic analysis utilizing next-generation sequencing of tissue samples and blood (cell-free DNA/cfDNA analysis) where available. Results: From June, 2014 through July, 2018, a total of 49 patients received abemaciclib, and 14 patients had prior palbociclib exposure. One patient was deceased shortly after initiating abemaciclib and one patient was lost to follow-up. Among the 12 remaining patients, eight had sequential courses of CDK4/6-based therapy, while four patients had at least one intervening non-CDK 4/6i based regimen. At data-cutoff of 8/15/2018, five patients (41.7%) had early progression on abemaciclib (PFS equal to or less than 120 days) while three (25%) patients had ongoing benefit (PFS greater than 120 days, two of three actively on therapy). Three additional patients had recently initiated abemaciclib therapy (less than 120 days prior to current analysis). Preliminary analysis of baseline cfDNA results in patients with early progression on abemaciclib therapy after prior CDK4/6i revealed the presence of RB1 mutation, FGFR1 amplification, and TP53 mutation, among others. Additional analyses with mature clinical data (including updated PFS and ORR), toxicity assessment during secondary CDK4/6i exposure, and further analysis of genomic sequencing results will be provided at the meeting. Conclusions: The majority of patients had early disease progression on abemaciclib after prior exposure to CDK4/6i suggesting potential cross-resistance to CDK4/6i mediated by common drivers. However, a subset of patients derived clinical benefit with continued exposure to CDK4/6i, highlighting the need for additional research to evaluate potential predictive biomarkers and guide rational utilization of continued CDK4/6 blockade in metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer. Citation Format: Wander SA, Spring LM, Stein CR, Yuen M, Zangardi M, O'Shaughnessy J, Bardia A. Abemaciclib after prior palbociclib exposure in patients with metastatic hormone-receptor positive (HR+)/HER2- breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-18-39.

Objective. To present the characteristics of the AKT1E117K gene variant and a description of the clinical application in a patient with metastatic breast cancer.Results. 63 y/o woman with Stage IV Invasive lobular carcinoma at diagnosis was treated with Palbociclib and aromatase inhibitors (AI). At progression, tissue was sent for comprehensive genomic profiling to Foundation Medicine (FM) which revealed AKT1E17K mutation. In lieu of available clinical data within the patient’s tumor type (HR+ HER2- breast cancer), extrapolated data from the Flatiron Health-FM (FH-FMI) Clinico-genomic Database (CGDB) was dis- cussed at our Molecular Tumor Board (MTB). After multidisciplinary discussion, the consensus recommendation was to start treatment with the combination of mTOR inhibitor everolimus, and AI, exemestane. Patient tolerated treatment without major side effects. By the second clinical visit the patient’s breast showed signs of improvement. PET/CT showed diminished left axillary uptake, decreased right paratracheal lymph node PET avidity, and stable bone disease consistent with a partial response. The most recent office visit in January 2021, breast exam revealed a normal-appearing skin with only faint erythema. All other skin lesions have resolved. Although, the role of AKT1 variant described here is not well defined and therapeutic significance of M-Tor inhibitors not established in metastatic breast cancers, comprehensive approach to this case unraveled new and successful therapeutic option in this patient. Conclusion. This demonstrates that applying available Precision Medicine tools like MTB and real world data sets from patient populations with similar clinical and genomic profiles may provide more options for treatment.

Purpose: Actionable mutations can guide genotype-directed matched therapy. We evaluated the utility of tissue-based and plasma-based genotyping for the identification of actionable mutations and selection of matched therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Experimental Design: Patients with MBC who underwent tissue genotyping (institutional platform, 91-gene assay) or plasma-based cell-free DNA (cfDNA, Guardant360, 73-gene assay) between January 2016 and December 2017 were included. A chart review of records to identify subtype, demographics, treatment, outcomes, and tissue genotyping or cfDNA results was performed. The incidence of actionable mutations and the selection of matched therapy in tissue genotyping or cfDNA cohorts was determined. The impact of matched therapy status on overall survival (OS) in tissue genotyping or cfDNA subgroups was determined with Cox regression analysis. Results: Of 252 patients who underwent cfDNA testing, 232 (92%) had detectable mutations, 196 (78%) had actionable mutations, and 86 (34%) received matched therapy. Of 118 patients who underwent tissue genotyping, 90 (76%) had detectable mutations, 59 (50%) had actionable mutations, and 13 (11%) received matched therapy. For cfDNA patients with actionable mutations, matched versus nonmatched therapy was associated with better OS [HR 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.23–0.73, P = 0.002], and this remained significant in a multivariable analysis correcting for age, subtype, visceral metastases, and brain metastases (HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.26–0.83, P = 0.010). Conclusions: Plasma-based genotyping identified high rates of actionable mutations, which was associated with significant application of matched therapy and better OS in patients with MBC. See related commentary by Rugo and Huppert, p. 3275

Background: Inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6i) are widely used as first-line therapy for hormone receptor–positive metastatic breast cancer (HR+ MBC). Although abemaciclib monotherapy is also FDA-approved for treatment of disease progression on endocrine therapy, there is limited insight into the clinical activity of abemaciclib after progression on prior CDK4/6i. Patients and Methods: We identified patients with HR+ MBC from 6 cancer centers in the United States who received abemaciclib after disease progression on prior CDK4/6i, and abstracted clinical features, outcomes, toxicity, and predictive biomarkers. Results: In the multicenter cohort, abemaciclib was well tolerated after a prior course of CDK4/6i (palbociclib)-based therapy; a minority of patients discontinued abemaciclib because of toxicity without progression (9.2%). After progression on palbociclib, most patients (71.3%) received nonsequential therapy with abemaciclib (with ≥1 intervening non-CDK4/6i regimens), with most receiving abemaciclib with an antiestrogen agent (fulvestrant, 47.1%; aromatase inhibitor, 27.6%), and the remainder receiving abemaciclib monotherapy (19.5%). Median progression-free survival for abemaciclib in this population was 5.3 months and median overall survival was 17.2 months, notably similar to results obtained in the MONARCH-1 study of abemaciclib monotherapy in heavily pretreated HR+/HER2-negative CDK4/6i-naïve patients. A total of 36.8% of patients received abemaciclib for ≥6 months. There was no relationship between the duration of clinical benefit while on palbociclib and the subsequent duration of treatment with abemaciclib. RB1, ERBB2, and CCNE1 alterations were noted among patients with rapid progression on abemaciclib. Conclusions: A subset of patients with HR+ MBC continue to derive clinical benefit from abemaciclib after progression on prior palbociclib. These results highlight the need for future studies to confirm molecular predictors of cross-resistance to CDK4/6i therapy and to better characterize the utility of abemaciclib after disease progression on prior CDK4/6i.

Seventy percent of breast cancers express the estrogen receptor (ER), and agents that target the ER are the mainstay of treatment. However, virtually all people with ER+ breast cancer develop resistance to ER-directed agents in the metastatic setting. Beyond mutations in the ER itself, which occur in 25–30% of people treated with aromatase inhibitors1–4, knowledge about clinical resistance mechanisms remains incomplete. We identified activating HER2 mutations in metastatic biopsies from eight patients with ER+ metastatic breast cancer who had developed resistance to aromatase inhibitors, tamoxifen or fulvestrant. Examination of treatment-naive primary tumors in five patients showed no evidence of pre-existing mutations in four of five patients, suggesting that these mutations were acquired under the selective pressure of ER-directed therapy. The HER2 mutations and ER mutations were mutually exclusive, suggesting a distinct mechanism of acquired resistance to ER-directed therapies. In vitro analysis confirmed that the HER2 mutations conferred estrogen independence as well as—in contrast to ER mutations—resistance to tamoxifen, fulvestrant and the CDK4 and CDK6 inhibitor palbociclib. Resistance was overcome by combining ER-directed therapy with the irreversible HER2 kinase inhibitor neratinib. Activating HER2 mutations are shown to confer resistance to ER-directed therapies in patients with ER+ metastatic breast cancer. Drug resistance caused by HER2 mutations was overcome by combining ER-directed therapy with a HER2 kinase inhibitor.

Introduction: Over the past several years, inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK 4/6) have revolutionized the treatment of hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer. However, evidence suggests an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) with use of these agents. Recent studies additionally suggest higher VTE rates in real-world populations receiving palbociclib as compared with the highly selected population of published clinical trials. Such study in real-world patients has not been performed for abemaciclib, a newer CDK 4/6 inhibitor with unique pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. This study evaluated rates and predictors of thrombosis in patients receiving abemaciclib for metastatic breast cancer. Methods: We conducted a multicenter observational cohort study of patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving abemaciclib at 5 affiliated hospitals. A research patient data repository was queried to identify all patients receiving abemaciclib and manual chart review was used to extract all data. Patient demographics, concurrent medications, labs, Khorana risk score, tumor characteristics, and relevant venous and arterial thrombotic risk factors (including age, BMI, prior thrombosis, recent surgery, hereditary thrombophilia, systemic inflammatory diseases, presence of brain metastases, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and atherosclerosis) were collected for all patients. The primary endpoint was thrombosis during abemaciclib treatment or within 30 days of discontinuation. Multivariable logistic models assessed predictors of VTE and a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare mortality in patients developing VTE with those who did not. Data are presented as median (IQR) or number (%). Results: Patient Cohort and Thrombosis Risk Factors. 364 patients were included in the analysis. 360 (98.9%) patients were female, with median (interquartile range) age of 61 (53-71) years. 320 (88.7%) were post-menopausal and 291 (79.9%) were concurrently on endocrine therapy (of which 19 (5.2%) were on tamoxifen). At the time of abemaciclib initiation, 51 (14.0%) were receiving long-term anticoagulation and 47 (12.9%) were receiving aspirin. Khorana scores were between 0-3 with 339 (93.1%) patients having a score of 0 or 1. 267 (73.4%) and 46 (12.6%) were diagnosed with invasive ductal and lobular carcinoma, respectfully. Brain metastases were present in 71 (19.5%) patients. Venous and arterial thrombosis risk factors for this cohort are highlighted in TABLE 1. The median duration of abemaciclib therapy was 5.5 (2.8-13.0) months and median duration of follow-up was 12.7 (6.2-22.1) months. Thrombotic Events. 27 patients (7.4%) developed one or more thrombotic event (17 VTE, 9 arterial thrombosis, 1 both). Events are described in TABLE 2. Risk Factors for VTE. In a multivariable logistic model including age, race, BMI, receipt of long-term anticoagulation, receipt of aspirin, brain metastases, Khorana risk score, receipt of tamoxifen, prior VTE, systemic autoimmune disease, and known thrombophilia, HER2 positivity was predictive of VTE during or after abemaciclib treatment (odds ratio 5.20, 95% CI 1.29-20.93, P=0.020). Association of VTE with Mortality. In a multivariable Cox model controlling for age, race, HER2 status, receipt of long-term anticoagulation, receipt of aspirin, brain metastases, Khorana risk score, receipt of tamoxifen, prior VTE, systemic autoimmune disease, and known thrombophilia, patients developing VTE during abemaciclib therapy had a significantly higher risk of death (hazard ratio, 2.04, 95% CI, 1.03-4.01, P=0.040), FIGURE 1. Median survival in patients developing a VTE vs. those who did not was 9.6 months vs. 25.8 months, respectively. Conclusions: In this study, we provide the first real-world data describing risk of venous and arterial thrombosis in a large cohort of patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with the CDK 4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib. As the role of abemaciclib continues to expand both within and beyond the metastatic disease setting, understanding the VTE risk of this agent has become critical. Thrombosis occurred in 7.4%, and in multivariable models controlling for relevant covariates, HER2 positivity predicted for development of VTE, and patients developing VTE had an approximate 2-fold risk of mortality. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Al-Samkari: Moderna: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Rigel: Consultancy; Argenx: Consultancy; Dova/Sobi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Clinical resistance mechanisms to CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR+ breast cancer have not been clearly defined. Whole exome sequencing of 59 tumors with CDK4/6i exposure revealed multiple candidate resistance mechanisms including RB1 loss, activating alterations in AKT1, RAS, AURKA, CCNE2, ERBB2, and FGFR2, and loss of ER expression. In vitro experiments confirmed that these alterations conferred CDK4/6i resistance. Cancer cells cultured to resistance with CDK4/6i also acquired RB1, KRAS, AURKA, or CCNE2 alterations, which conferred sensitivity to AURKA, ERK, or CHEK1 inhibition. Besides inactivation of RB1, which accounts for ∼5% of resistance, seven of these mechanisms have not been previously identified as clinical mediators of resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors in patients. Three of these—RAS activation, AKT activation, and AURKA activation—have not to our knowledge been previously demonstrated preclinically. Together, these eight mechanisms were present in 80% of resistant tumors profiled and may define therapeutic opportunities in patients.SignificanceWe identified eight distinct mechanisms of resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors present in 80% of resistant tumors profiled. Most of these have a therapeutic strategy to overcome or prevent resistance in these tumors. Taken together, these findings have critical implications related to the potential utility of precision-based approaches to overcome resistance in many patients with HR+ MBC.

BackgroundLittle is known about mechanisms of resistance to PARP inhibitors and platinum chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer andBRCA1/2 mutations. Further investigation of resistance in clinical cohorts may point to strategies to prevent or overcome treatment failure.Patients and MethodsWe obtained tumor biopsies from metastatic breast cancer patients withBRCA1/2deficiency before and after acquired resistance to PARP inhibitor or platinum chemotherapy. Whole exome sequencing was performed on each tumor, germline DNA, and circulating tumor DNA. Tumors underwent RNA sequencing, and immunohistochemical staining for RAD51 foci on tumor sections was performed for functional assessment of intact homologous recombination.ResultsPre- and post-resistance tumor samples were sequenced from 8 patients (4 withBRCA1and 4 withBRCA2mutation; 4 treated with PARP inhibitor and 4 with platinum). Following disease progression on DNA-damaging therapy, four patients (50%) acquired at least one somatic reversion alteration likely to result in functional BRCA1/2 protein detected by tumor or circulating tumor DNA sequencing. Two patients with germlineBRCA1deficiency acquired genomic alterations anticipated to restore homologous recombination through increased DNA end resection: loss ofTP53BP1in one patient and amplification ofMRE11Ain another. RAD51 foci were acquired post-resistance in all patients with genomic reversion, consistent with reconstitution of homologous recombination. All patients whose tumors demonstrated RAD51 foci post-resistance were intrinsically resistant to subsequent lines of DNA-damaging therapy.ConclusionsGenomic reversion inBRCA1/2was the most commonly observed mechanism of resistance, occurring in 4 of 8 patients. Novel sequence alterations leading to increased DNA end resection were seen in two patients, and may be targetable for therapeutic benefit. The presence of RAD51 foci by immunohistochemistry was consistent with BRCA1/2 protein functional status from genomic data and predicted response to later DNA-damaging therapy, supporting RAD51 focus formation as a clinically useful biomarker.

Purpose: While FGFR1 amplification has been described in breast cancer, the optimal treatment approach for FGFR1-amplified (FGFR1+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remains undefined. Experimental Design: We evaluated clinical response to endocrine and targeted therapies in a cohort of patients with hormone receptor–positive (HR+)/HER2− MBC and validated the functional role of FGFR1-amplification in mediating response/resistance to hormone therapy in vitro. Results: In the clinical cohort (N = 110), we identified that patients with FGFR1+ tumors were more likely to have progesterone receptor (PR)-negative disease (47% vs. 20%; P = 0.005), coexisting TP53 mutations (41% vs. 21%; P = 0.05), and exhibited shorter time to progression with endocrine therapy alone and in combination with CDK4/6 inhibitor, but not with a mTOR inhibitor (everolimus), adjusting for key prognostic variables in multivariate analysis. Furthermore, mTOR-based therapy resulted in a sustained radiological and molecular response in an index case of FGFR1+ HR+/HER2− MBC. In preclinical models, estrogen receptor–positive (ER+)/FGFR1-amplified CAMA1 human breast cancer cells were only partially sensitive to fulvestrant, palbociclib, and alpelisib, but highly sensitive to everolimus. In addition, transduction of an FGFR1 expression vector into ER+ T47D cells induced resistance to fulvestrant that could be overcome by added TORC1 inhibition, but not PI3K or CDK4/6 inhibition. Conclusions: Collectively, these findings suggest that while FGFR1 amplification confers broad resistance to ER, PI3K, and CDK4/6 inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors might have a unique therapeutic role in the treatment of patients with ER+/FGFR1+ MBC.

Beyond acquired mutations in the estrogen receptor (ER), mechanisms of resistance to ER-directed therapies in ER+ breast cancer have not been clearly defined. We conducted a genome-scale functional screen spanning 10,135 genes to investigate genes whose overexpression confer resistance to selective estrogen receptor degraders. Pathway analysis of candidate resistance genes demonstrated that the FGFR, ERBB, insulin receptor, and MAPK pathways represented key modalities of resistance. In parallel, we performed whole exome sequencing in paired pre-treatment and post-resistance biopsies from 60 patients with ER+ metastatic breast cancer who had developed resistance to ER-targeted therapy. The FGFR pathway was altered via FGFR1, FGFR2, or FGF3/FGF4 amplifications or FGFR2 mutations in 24 (40%) of the post-resistance biopsies. In 12 of the 24 post-resistance tumors exhibiting FGFR/FGF alterations, these alterations were not detected in the corresponding pre-treatment tumors, suggesting that they were acquired or enriched under the selective pressure of ER-directed therapy. In vitro experiments in ER+ breast cancer cells confirmed that FGFR/FGF alterations led to fulvestrant resistance as well as cross-resistance to the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib, through activation of the MAPK pathway. The resistance phenotypes were reversed by FGFR inhibitors and, to a lesser extent, MEK inhibitors, suggesting potential treatment strategies. Significance A genome-scale overexpression screen revealed a broad spectrum of resistance mechanisms against SERDs, which can provide a resource for researchers studying resistance to ER-directed therapies as well as the biology of estrogen receptor dependencies in ER+ breast cancer. We demonstrate that activating FGFR/FGF alterations are a mechanism of acquired resistance to ER-directed therapies and CDK4/6 inhibitors in ER+ metastatic breast cancer and can be overcome by combination therapy targeting both the ER and the FGFR pathway. The detection of targetable, clonally acquired genetic alterations in metastatic tumor biopsies highlights the value of serial tumor testing to dissect mechanisms of resistance in human breast cancer and its potential application in directing clinical management.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To describe the clinical role of CDK 4/6 inhibitors in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (HR+ MBC) as well as current controversies and evolving areas of research. RECENT FINDINGS: Palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib are each approved in combination with an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant for HR+ MBC. Abemaciclib is also approved as monotherapy for pre-treated patients. Key questions in the field include whether all patients with HR+ MBC should receive a CDK 4/6 inhibitor up front versus later line, impact on overall survival, role of continued CDK 4/6 blockade, mechanism of clinical resistance, and treatment sequencing. SUMMARY: The development of CDK 4/6 inhibitors has changed the therapeutic management of HR+ MBC. Additional research is needed to determine optimal treatment sequencing, understand mechanisms governing resistance, and develop novel therapeutic strategies to circumvent or overcome clinical resistance and further improve the outcomes of patients with MBC.

Background: Although the androgen receptor (AR) is frequently co-expressed with ER and PR in hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2- breast cancer, the biological significance of detectable AR alterations (ARalt) in metastatic disease (MBC) remains poorly understood. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the association of ARalt status with clinical outcomes among women with HR+/HER2- MBC. Methods: Retrospective review was performed on patients with HR+/HER2- MBC treated at an academic institution, for whom genotyping information was available. ARalt status was determined using Guardant360, a 73-gene next-generation sequencing assay that detects both AR mutations and amplifications in circulating tumor DNA. Women with positive or unknown HER2 status and triple-negative breast cancer were excluded from analysis, as were cases of male breast cancer. Time-to-progression on the therapy initiated immediately following Guardant testing was compared based on ARalt status, excluding patients treated with androgen-directed therapies given potential for confounding. Cumulative incidence plots were generated and analyzed by Gray’s test, and propensity score-adjusted competing risk models were generated with the probability of treatment as a function of age at metastatic diagnosis, presence of visceral metastasis, presence of de novo metastases, as well as number of prior therapies. Additional analysis was performed to assess progression stratified by treatment type (endocrine or non-endocrine based). Results: Among women with HR+/HER2- MBC (n=222), 16 patients (7%) had detectable ARalt (12 point mutations, 4 amplifications). No baseline differences were observed between women with ARalt and those without AR alterations (ARwt), with respect to age at primary or metastatic diagnosis, menopause status, time to onset of metastasis or de novo metastatic disease, presence of visceral metastases, or number of endocrine/chemotherapies received prior to Guardant testing. ARalt tumors had a higher frequency of detected mutations (14% vs. 5%, p Conclusions: ARalt tumors demonstrate a higher rate of progression on endocrine-based therapy as compared to ARwt tumors, highlighting a potential role of AR in mediating resistance to endocrine therapy in HR+/HER2- disease. Further translational investigations are warranted to determine whether ARalt/HR+/HER2- disease represents a unique biological subtype that predominantly relies on AR signaling and may thus benefit from blockade with AR antagonists. Table 1. Multivariable competing risks model for endocrine progression.CovariatePFSMultivariableHR95% CIP-valuePositive ARalt status4.172.43-7.17 Citation Format: Charles Dai, Andrzej Niemierko, Neelima Vidula, Laura M Spring, Seth A Wander, Arielle J Medford, Katherine A Hesler, Giuliana Malvarosa, Jeffrey Peppercorn, Dejan Juric, Steven J Isakoff, Beverly Moy, Leif W Ellisen, Aditya Bardia. Molecular alterations in the androgen receptor and associated clinical outcomes in hormone receptor-positive/HER2- metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS17-02.

Introduction: The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i), in combination with an antiestrogen, have emerged as standard-of-care options in both the first- and subsequent-line setting for patients with metastatic hormone-receptor positive (HR+)/HER2- breast cancer. Despite their widespread use, limited insight exists into the molecular pathways governing response and resistance to these agents. Methods and Results: We performed whole-exome sequencing on metastatic tumor specimens from 59 patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancer who had received CDK4/6i-based therapy. Tumor biopsies were characterized as demonstrating sensitivity, intrinsic resistance, or acquired resistance based upon the timing of resistance, radiographic response, and duration of therapy. In contrast to prior reports indicating PIK3CA enrichment in patients receiving CDK4/6i-based therapy, alterations in PI3K were approximately evenly distributed in this cohort between sensitive and resistant biopsies (8/20, 40% vs. 21/40, 52.5%, respectively, p = 0.808 via Fisher's exact test). Activating alterations in AKT1, however, were identified in three resistant tumor specimens, including both point mutations and amplification. In two instances where matched pretreatment sensitive biopsies and post-treatment resistance biopsies were available, an AKT1 point mutation and an AKT1 amplification, respectively, were uniquely identified in the resistant biopsy. Immunohistochemical analysis of sensitive and resistance biopsy specimens in these patients confirmed upregulation of pAKT, pS6, and pRb, indicating upregulation of the AKT signaling axis. AKT1 was introduced into multiple HR+ breast cancer cell lines in vitro (T47D, MCF7, and CAMA1) via lentiviral overexpression. Overexpression of AKT1 in these cell lines provoked significant resistance to palbociclib, abemaciclib, fulvestrant, and estrogen deprivation (via charcoal-stripped serum, CSS). AKT1-expressing cells were also resistant to the various pairwise combinations of antiestrogen and CDK4/6i. Sensitivity to estrogen deprivation and CDK4/6i could be restored by treatment with the AKT inhibitor MK2206. Conclusions: In contrast to prior reports, PIK3CA mutations did not correlate with resistance to CDK4/6 inhibition in our cohort of tumor specimens from 59 patients with metastatic HR+ breast cancer. AKT1 has emerged as a key potential mediator of resistance to both antiestrogens and CDK4/6i in vitro and in vivo. AKT1 pathway activation may serve as a potential biomarker of resistance to CDK4/6i, while novel strategies to target AKT1 may restore sensitivity to CDK4/6i-based therapy in HR+ metastatic breast cancer. Citation Format: Seth A. Wander, Ofir Cohen, Gabriela N. Johnson, Jorge Buendia, Flora Luo, Joseph Geradts, Eric P. Winer, Nancy U. Lin, Levi A. Garraway, Nikhil Wagle. Genomic sequencing of metastatic hormone-receptor positive breast cancer implicates AKT1 in driving resistance to cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Targeting PI3K/mTOR Signaling; 2018 Nov 30-Dec 8; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2020;18(10_Suppl):Abstract nr B23.

531 Background: Given the success of CDK 4/6 inhibitors for ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer, there is much interest in exploring these agents in early breast cancer to potentially reduce recurrence risk. However, tolerability and adherence are important considerations in the adjuvant setting. We evaluated the tolerability and adherence of adjuvant endocrine therapy with the CDK 4/6 inhibitor, ribociclib, in two different schedules, in a prospective phase II clinical trial. Methods: Eligible patients were those with localized stage I-III ER+ (≥ 10%), HER2- breast cancer who had completed surgery and were on adjuvant endocrine therapy with at least one year or more of treatment remaining. Patients were randomized to receive continuous ribociclib (400 mg daily of 28-day cycle; arm 1) or intermittent ribociclib (600 mg daily on days 1-21 of 28-day cycle; arm 2) for one year, in addition to an aromatase inhibitor (plus GnRH agonist if premenopausal). Toxicities were evaluated using CTCAE version 4.03. Adherence was monitored by review of patient diaries and pill count. Results: Of the 81 patients enrolled, 24 discontinued early. The table shows the current status of the patients based on treatment arm (data cut-off as of 1/31/20; updated results will be presented at meeting). A total of 8 serious adverse events (AEs) have occurred thus far: grade 3 transaminitis (1), grade 4 transaminitis (3), grade 3 colitis (1), grade 3 infection (2), and grade 4 lymphopenia (1). The most common grade 3 or greater AEs leading to study discontinuation thus far were transaminitis (8.6%), neutropenia (2.5%), and fatigue (2.5%). No patients discontinued early due to prolonged QTc. Adherence results will be reported at the meeting. Conclusions: Interim results demonstrate that while serious AEs with one year of adjuvant ribociclib are low, a number of patients discontinued adjuvant CDK 4/6 inhibitor. Tolerability and adherence patterns will need to be carefully considered with CDK 4/6 inhibitors in the adjuvant setting. Clinical trial information: NCT03285412 . [Table: see text]

1066 Background: The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i), with an anti-estrogen, are the standard of care for HR+/HER2- MBC. Insights from patient biopsies and preclinical analysis suggest that AKT1 activation can provoke CDK4/6i resistance. We hypothesized that targeting AKT1 following CDK4/6i progression may provide clinical benefit. Methods: TAKTIC is an open-label phase Ib trial exploring the combination of the AKT1 inhibitor, ipatasertib (ipat), with an aromatase inhibitor (Arm A), fulvestrant (Arm B), or the triplet combination (Arm C) of fulvestrant + ipat + palbociclib (palbo). The primary objective is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of ipat in combination with endocrine therapy +/- CDK4/6i. Key inclusion criteria include unresectable HR+/HER2- MBC; at least 1 prior therapy for MBC including any CDK4/6i; up to 2 prior lines of chemotherapy for MBC (no limit on prior endocrine therapy). Here, we present an interim analysis from the triplet combination (Arm C). Results: As of 1/31/2020, 25 pts have enrolled, including 12 on Arm C, all of whom received prior CDK4/6i (median no of prior lines = 5.5, range 2-7). Along with fulvestrant, 3 pts received ipat at 200mg + 125mg palbo, 7 pts received 300mg + 125mg palbo, and 2 pts received 400mg + 100mg palbo. To date, 8/12 pts remain on treatment including 2 with partial response, 3 with stable disease, 3 with restaging studies pending and 4 with progressive disease. The triplet combination was well tolerated. Grade 3 toxicities included reduced WBC (8/12), reduced neutrophil count (11/12), reduced lymphocyte count (2/12) and single instances of transaminitis, rash, and reduced platelet count. The only grade 4 toxicity was reduced neutrophil count (4/12). There were no DLTs observed and no discontinuations due to toxicity. Mean steady state pharmacokinetic parameters for ipat were similar to historical data from single agent trials suggesting that combined treatment with palbo + fulvestrant did not affect the pharmacokinetics of ipat. Updated analysis will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: The triplet combination of endocrine therapy with CDK 4/6i and AKTi appears to be well tolerated in heavily pre-treated pts, with a subset demonstrating signs of clinical benefit. The trial demonstrates how insights into the molecular mechanisms of CDK4/6i resistance could be leveraged into actionable therapeutic regimens for HR+/HER2- MBC. Clinical trial information: NCT03959891 .

While recent studies have begun characterizing the metastatic breast cancer (MBC) genomics, our understanding of mechanisms of acquired endocrine-resistance, their induced cell-state, and their altered drug-response profile, remains lacking. We collected biopsies from patients with MBC with detailed clinicopathologic features. To date we profiled 520 exomes, and 291 transcriptomes, with 126 patients having multiple biopsy exomes. Curated endocrine-relapse set include 60 patients with pre-treatment and post-relapse exomes. Characterization of candidate mechanisms of resistance (MOR) included 909 RNA-seq profiles of T47D cells with introduced MOR under various drugs. In the acquired endocrine resistance cohort, as expected, we found frequent ESR1 acquired mutations (13 pt, 22%). Additionally, we identified acquired activating SNVs and amplifications in oncogenic receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) in 18/60 (30%), including EGF family - HER2 (n=7), ERRB3 (R525Q), and EGFR (S116F), and FGF family - FGFR1 (n=5), FGFR2 (n=4), and FGF3 amplicon (n=4). RNA-seq of T47D cells overexpressing HER2 activating mutations revealed a distinct cell-state (HER2-ACT). Similarly, FGFR activation revealed a district FGFR-ACT state. The transcriptional signatures of these HER2 and FGFR states were remarkably similar (odd-ratio= 91, p= 2.64E-94). To characterize the cell-state common to HER and FGFR, we defined RTK-ACT with 358 overlapping marker genes (see table). Canonical (estradiol) ER signaling is slightly elevated in RTK-ACT, however this state is strongly associated with growth-factor driven ER signaling, suggesting reprogramming of ER from AF2, to AF1 signaling. Consistent with this, RTK-ACT had significantly higher MAPK activation. Additionally, RTK-ACT Induced stronger similarity to Basal-state, enrichment in motility/migration, mesenchymal, and stem-like features, with top genes including CDH3, MBP7, and S100, ETV, DUSP, SPRY families (see table). To study RTK-driven state in-vivo, we analyzed RNA-seq from our MBC biopsies, and compared tumors with activating RTK mutations (n=38) with WT (n=118), and inferred activated RTK in-vivo (RTK.ACT.iv). Our in-vitro and in-vivo states show significant overlap (OR=4.71, p=9.42E-20). Furthermore, characterization of RTK.ACT.iv, recapitulated all the cell-state features observed in RTK.ACT - including higher growth-factors ER signaling, MAPK, and basal-like state (see table). We further studied the viability and transcription of these RTKs under various drugs (12 treatments), including fulvestrant, palbociclib, and specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) - Neratinib (pan-HER inhibitor) and FIIN-3 (FGFR-i). We found that HER2-ACT and FGFR-ACT signatures remain robust when treated with fulvestrant, palbociclib, and their combinations, as compared to TKIs suppression (see table). in-line with our viability results - suggesting intrinsic resistance to CDK4/6i and sensitivity to TKIs. This study demonstrated that activating RTKs constitute of prevalent modality of acquired resistance to endocrine therapies, inducing a distinct state with clinical implications - suggesting the potential benefit of combination therapies with specific TKIs over CDK4/6i. The common MAPK activity and our preliminary results - suggests the potential of convergence-node targeting strategy with added MEK or SHP2 inhibition. TableGene set AGene set BOdds-ratioP-value (two-sided)Fisher''s Exact test matHER2-ACT -FGFR-ACT -912.64E-9469, 131, 131, 22704HER2 S653C, L755S, V777L, L869R vs. GFP, under DMSO, rank genes based on the logFC (top 200)FGFR1, FGFR2 (WT, N550K, M538I, K660N) vs. GFP, Parental, Under DMSO, rank genes based on the logFC (top 200)HER2-ACT_1000 -FGFR-ACT_1000 -18.98.28E-248358, 642, 642, 21758HER2 S653C, L755S, V777L, L869R vs. GFP, under DMSO, rank genes based on the logFC- top 1000FGFR1, FGFR2 (WT, N550K, M538I, K660N) vs. GFP, Parental, Under DMSO, rank genes based on the logFC - top 1000RTK-ACTHALLMARK_ESTROGEN_RESPONSE_EARLY, MSigDB3.030.004229, 191, 349, 22474RTK-ACTER driven by Growth Factors, PMID: 208897186.771.74E-059, 86, 349, 22585RTK-ACTMEK_UP.V1_UP (MAPK), MSigDB10.95.72E-1827, 169, 331, 22496RTK-ACTRAS ONCOGENE (MAPK), PMID: 162730928.445.77E-1220, 158, 338, 22553RTK-ACTWU_CELL_MIGRATION, PMID 187243907.648.96E-1119, 165, 339, 22502RTK-ACTHUPER_BREAST_BASAL_VS_LUMINAL_UP, PMID 17409405131.38E-079, 45, 349, 22621RTK-ACTHALLMARK_EPITHELIAL_MESENCHYMAL_TRANSITION, MSigDB3.770.00031411, 189, 347, 22477RTK-ACTLIM_MAMMARY_STEM_CELL_UP, PMID 203461513.119.56E-0622, 467, 336, 22205RTK-ACTRTK-ACT.iv -4.719.42E-2060, 940, 298, 21992In MBC biopsies, compare RTK mutations with WT, rank genes based on the logFC - top 1000RTK-ACT.iv (in-vivo)HALLMARK_ESTROGEN_RESPONSE_EARLY, MSigDB1.950.020316, 184, 984, 22088RTK-ACT.ivER driven by Growth Factors, PMID: 208897182.640.0076310, 85, 990, 22193RTK-ACT.ivMEK_UP.V1_UP (MAPK), MSigDB2.863.91E-0522, 174, 978, 22098RTK-ACT.ivRAS ONCOGENE (MAPK), PMID: 162730921.620.13212, 166, 988, 22152RTK-ACT.ivWU_CELL_MIGRATION, PMID 187243903.573.60E-0725, 159, 975, 22115RTK-ACT.ivHUPER_BREAST_BASAL_VS_LUMINAL_UP, PMID 174094059.515.43E-1016, 38, 984, 22235RTK-ACT.ivHALLMARK_EPITHELIAL_MESENCHYMAL_TRANSITION, MSigDB2.090.0073817, 183, 983, 22090RTK-ACT.ivLIM_MAMMARY_STEM_CELL_UP, PMID 203461511.420.089229, 460, 971, 21819HER2-ACTHER2-ACT - Fulv3006.53E-183109, 91, 91, 22750HER2-ACTHER2-ACT - Palbo2331.46E-163101, 99, 99, 22749HER2-ACTHER2.ACT - Fulv + Palbo2197.64E-15999, 101, 101, 22742HER2-ACTHER2.ACT - Neratinib63.19.78E-7257, 143, 143, 22707HER2-ACTHER2.ACT - Fulv + Neratinib59.33.53E-6855, 145, 145, 22724FGFR-ACTFGFR.ACT - Palbo19003.2e-319157, 43, 43, 22778FGFR-ACTFGFR.ACT - Fulv + Palbo12501.38E-290148, 52, 52, 22767FGFR-ACTFGFR.ACT - Fulv8661.72E-266140, 60, 60, 22764FGFR-ACTFGFR.ACT - Palbo + FIIN.31062.88E-10474, 126, 126, 22710FGFR-ACTFGFR.ACT - Fulv + Palbo + FIIN.378.41.14E-8464, 136, 136, 22705FGFR-ACTFGFR.ACT - FIIN.367.42.16E-7559, 141, 141, 22730FGFR-ACTFGFR.ACT - Fulv + FIIN.336.89.47E-4541, 159, 159, 22733 Citation Format: Ofir Cohen, Pingping Mao, Utthara Nayar, Jorge E Buendia-Bue, Dewey Kim, Esha Jain, Karla Helvie, Daniel Abravanel, Kailey J Kowalski, Christian Kapstad, Samuel Freeman, Victor Adalsteinsson, Seth A Wander, Adrienne G Waks, Gad Getz, Aviv Regev, Eric Winer P Winer, Nancy U Nancy U. Lin, Nikhil Wagle. Acquired activating mutations in RTKs confer endocrine resistance in ER+ metastatic breast cancer through ER-reprogramming, MAPK signaling, and an induced stem-like cell state [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS2-02.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a lethal hematologic malignancy associated with poor clinical outcomes. In recent years, mutations in the IDH1 and IDH2 genes have been discovered across a range of malignancies, including AML, raising hope for effective targeted therapies. An intriguing aspect of IDH1/2-mutant malignancies is the aberrant production of the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG), which likely play a pivotal oncogenic role. We recently reported that 2-HG is dramatically elevated in the sera, marrow and urine of IDH1/2-mutant AML patients, and that levels of this oncometabolite directly correlate with disease burden and therapeutic response. The discovery of IDH1/2 mutations and their impact on important proteomic and metabolic pathways has triggered intensive efforts to develop novel and targeted therapies. IDH1/2 inhibitors are currently under early phase clinical investigation, with promising suggestion of efficacy. Other therapeutic approaches under preclinical and clinical investigation in this population include DNA methyltransferase inhibitors and agents that target glutamine metabolism through inhibition of glutaminase or depletion of serum glutamine by asparaginase products.

1085 Background: Little is known about MoR to PARPi and platinum chemotx in MBC pts with BRCA1/2 mutations. Biomarkers predictive of response/resistance have not been identified, but could have clinical utility. Methods: We obtained 8 BRCA-mutant metastatic tumor biopsies from MBC pts with acquired resistance to DNA-damaging tx (PARPi/platinum) on a prospective tissue collection protocol. In 7/8 patients, we also obtained pre-tx biopsies. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed on each tumor and on germline DNA from blood. We performed immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for RAD51 foci for functional assessment of intact homologous recombination (HR). Results: 4/7 pts with complete WES analysis acquired a somatic reversion mutation likely to result in functional BRCA1/2 protein in the post-tx tumor specimen after platinum (2 pts) or PARPi (2 pts; Table). 4/7 pts had plausible non-reversion MoR identified by WES, including alterations in genes involved in replication fork protection and DNA end resection. As expected, in all pts with genomic reversion, RAD51 foci were acquired in the post-resistance tumor, consistent with reconstitution of HR. In 2 pts without reversion, presence of RAD51 foci post-resistance was mixed. Reversion mutations occurred both with and without other alterations that could possibly lead to fork protection, suggesting > 1 MoR could occur in the same tumor. 3 pts whose tumors demonstrated RAD51 foci post-resistance were later re-exposed to DNA-damaging tx, to which all had intrinsic resistance. Conclusions: BRCA1/2 reversion was identified as a MoR in the majority of pts. WES identified potential novel MoR in fork protection and end resection genes. The presence of RAD51 foci by IHC was consistent with BRCA protein functional status from genomic data and predicted response to later DNA-damaging tx, suggesting RAD51 IHC may be a clinically useful biomarker. [Table: see text]

1057 Background: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) are widely used for pts with HR+/HER2- MBC. The MONARCH-1 trial of abemaciclib monotherapy in pre-treated pts demonstrated a median progression free survival (PFS) of 6.0 months, leading to approval as monotherapy in a CDK4/6i-naïve population. There are no data on abemaciclib in HR+/HER2- MBC after progressive disease (PD) with CDK4/6i. Methods: We evaluated clinical outcomes in pts with HR+/HER2- MBC who received abemaciclib following PD on prior palbociclib or ribociclib at 4 US academic centers. We conducted genomic analysis utilizing next-generation sequencing of tissue samples and blood (cell-free/cfDNA) when available. Results: From 2/2015 through 1/2019, 58 pts with HR+/HER2- MBC received abemaciclib following PD on prior palbociclib. 20 pts (34%) received sequential courses of therapy, while 38 pts (66%) had at least one intervening non-CDK4/6i regimen. 14 pts (24%) received abemaciclib monotherapy and 44 pts (76%) received it in combination with an antiestrogen, including fulvestrant (52%), an aromatase inhibitor (22%), and tamoxifen (2%). 22 pts (38%) required dose reduction, while 7 (12%) discontinued due to toxicity. At data cutoff (1/23/2019), 20 pts (34%) had early PD (duration < 90 days), while 21 pts (36%) had treatment duration exceeding 6 months, including 10 who remain on treatment at interim analysis (range 181-413 days). The median PFS was 5.8 months (95%CI 3.4 – 8.0). Preliminary analysis of cfDNA revealed RB1 and FGFR1 alterations in pts with PD on abemaciclib. Additional analyses with mature clinical data and genomic sequencing will be provided at the meeting. Conclusions: This is the first multi-center experience to demonstrate that a substantial proportion of pts continue to derive clinical benefit with abemaciclib after prior CDK4/6i, highlighting the potential for its use following CDK4/6 blockade. A second subset had early progression, suggesting cross-resistance to CDK4/6i via common pathways. Future effort should be directed towards validating potential biomarkers to guide optimal utilization of continued CDK4/6 blockade in HR+/HER2- MBC.

Background: While great strides have been made in the treatment of ER+ MBC, therapeutic resistance is nearly universal. The genomic evolution of ER+ breast cancer in the metastatic setting under the selective pressure of multiple lines of therapies is not well understood. To address this, we analyzed the clonal dynamics of serial metastatic samples (mets) to evaluate how tumors evolve and to identify acquired resistance mechanisms. Methods: We performed WES on 462 clinically annotated samples from 208 patients (pts) with ER+ MBC, including 67 primary tumor biopsies, 229 metastatic biopsies and 160 blood samples (cfDNA). Pts with multiple mets included cases with temporally concordant metastatic tumor and blood samples (48 pts) and cases with serial mets obtained over the course of treatment in the metastatic setting (69 pts). Treatments given between the serial mets included CDK4/6 inhibitors (23 pts), and selective estrogen receptor degraders (19 pts), among others. Results: In the temporally-concordant mets, we found that cfDNA mutations (muts) largely overlap with muts found in tumor biopsies, capturing >85% of clonal tumor muts. However, we observed a higher level of heterogeneity in cfDNA compared to biopsies (p.value< 1.05e-19, Welch test) and a subset of high-confidence muts that were only detected in cfDNA, including in clinically important genes such as ESR1, PIK3CA, KRAS, and ERBB2. Analysis of serial mets was used to elucidate the evolutionary dynamics within the metastatic setting under the selective pressure of treatment. The median duration between mets was 112 days and the median number of inter-biopsy unique treatments was two. Most tumors continued to evolve within the metastatic setting, with 50 out of 69 pts (72%) acquiring a meaningful sub-clone (50% increase in relative cancer cell fraction) and 31 out of 69 (45%) acquiring muts in known cancer genes, including a subset acquiring a plausible resistance alteration such as alterations that dysregulate ER (5 out of 69 pts, 7%; ESR1 mut, FOXA1 amplification (amp), NCOR1 bi-allelic deletion (del)), ERBB (4%; ERBB2 amp, ERBB3 mut), RAS (4%; KRAS mut, NRAS amp, NF1 del), FGF/FGFR (12%; FGFR2 mut, FGFR1/2 amp, FGF3 amp), and cell cycle (13%; RB1 del, CDK4 amp, AURKA amp, CDKN2A del). Finally, in pts who had multiple mets, we observed several cases of evolutionary convergence toward equivalent resistance mechanisms including convergent RB1 loss as a mechanism of resistance to a CDK4/6 inhibitor and convergent BRCA2 reversion following resistance to a PARP inhibitor. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that ER+ MBC continues to evolve under the selective pressure of treatments in the metastatic setting. These findings elucidate the challenge of studying high complexity and heavily treated tumors, while also highlighting some commonalities in the evolutionary trajectories selected by these treatments. The multiplicity of clinically relevant genomic alterations acquired in these advanced stages highlights the need for serial biopsies and the potential to inform post-progression therapeutic choices through targeting the acquired dependencies in post-progression tumors. Citation Format: Cohen O, Buendia-Buendia J, Wander S, Nayar U, Mao P, Waks A, Kim D, Freeman S, Adalsteinsson V, Helvie K, Livitz D, Rosebrock D, Leshchiner I, Dellostritto L, Garrido-Castro A, Jain E, Periyasamy S, Mackichan C, Lloyd M, Marini L, Krop I, Garraway L, Getz G, Winer E, Lin N, Wagle N. Evolutionary analysis of 462 serial metastatic biopsies from 208 patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) using whole exome sequencing (WES) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD9-02.

Increasing evidence suggests that stem-like cells mediate cancer therapy resistance and metastasis. Breast tumour-initiating stem cells (T-ISC) are known to be enriched in CD44(+) CD24(neg/low) cells. Here, we identify two T-ISC subsets within this population in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) lines and dissociated primary breast cancer cultures: CD44(+) CD24(low+) subpopulation generates CD44(+) CD24(neg) progeny with reduced sphere formation and tumourigenicity. CD44(+) CD24(low+) populations contain subsets of ALDH1(+) and ESA(+) cells, yield more frequent spheres and/or T-ISC in limiting dilution assays, preferentially express metastatic gene signatures and show greater motility, invasion and, in the MDA-MB-231 model, metastatic potential. CD44(+) CD24(low+) but not CD44(+) CD24(neg) express activated Notch1 intracellular domain (N1-ICD) and Notch target genes. We show N1-ICD transactivates SOX2 to increase sphere formation, ALDH1+ and CD44(+) CD24(low+) cells. Gamma secretase inhibitors (GSI) reduced sphere formation and xenograft growth from CD44(+) CD24(low+) cells, but CD44(+) CD24(neg) were resistant. While GSI hold promise for targeting T-ISC, stem cell heterogeneity as observed herein, could limit GSI efficacy. These data suggest a breast T-ISC hierarchy in which distinct pathways drive developmentally related subpopulations with different anti-cancer drug responsiveness.

Oncogenic PI3K/mTOR activation is frequently observed in human cancers and activates cell motility via p27 phosphorylations at T157 and T198. Here we explored the potential for a novel PI3K/mTOR inhibitor to inhibit tumor invasion and metastasis. An MDA-MB-231 breast cancer line variant, MDA-MB-231-1833, with high metastatic bone tropism, was treated with a novel catalytic PI3K/mTOR inhibitor, PF-04691502, at nM doses that did not impair proliferation. Effects on tumor cell motility, invasion, p27 phosphorylation, localization, and bone metastatic outgrowth were assayed. MDA-MB-231-1833 showed increased PI3K/mTOR activation, high levels of cytoplasmic p27pT157pT198 and increased cell motility and invasion in vitro versus parental. PF-04691502 treatment, at a dose that did not affect proliferation, reduced total and cytoplasmic p27, decreased p27pT157pT198 and restored cell motility and invasion to levels seen in MDA-MB-231. p27 knockdown in MDA-MB-231-1833 phenocopied PI3K/mTOR inhibition, whilst overexpression of the phosphomimetic mutant p27T157DT198D caused resistance to the anti-invasive effects of PF-04691502. Pre-treatment of MDA-MB-231-1833 with PF-04691502 significantly impaired metastatic tumor formation in vivo, despite lack of antiproliferative effects in culture and little effect on primary orthotopic tumor growth. A further link between cytoplasmic p27 and metastasis was provided by a study of primary human breast cancers which showed cytoplasmic p27 is associated with increased lymph nodal metastasis and reduced survival. Novel PI3K/mTOR inhibitors may oppose tumor metastasis independent of their growth inhibitory effects, providing a rationale for clinical investigation of PI3K/mTOR inhibitors in settings to prevent micrometastasis. In primary human breast cancers, cytoplasmic p27 is associated with worse outcomes and increased nodal metastasis, and may prove useful as a marker of both PI3K/mTOR activation and PI3K/mTOR inhibitor efficacy. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10549-012-2389-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Aberrant expression of aurora kinase A is implicated in the genesis of various neoplasms, including acute myeloid leukemia. Alisertib, an aurora A kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy as monotherapy in trials of myeloid malignancy, and this efficacy appears enhanced in combination with conventional chemotherapies. In this phase I, dose-escalation study, newly diagnosed patients received conventional induction with cytarabine and idarubicin, after which alisertib was administered for 7 days. Dose escalation occurred via cohorts. Patients could then receive up to four cycles of consolidation, incorporating alisertib, and thereafter alisertib maintenance for up to 12 months. Twenty-two patients were enrolled. One dose limiting toxicity occurred at dose level 2 (prolonged thrombocytopenia), and the recommended phase 2 dose was established at 30mg twice daily. Common therapy-related toxicities included cytopenias and mucositis. Only three (14%) patients had persistent disease at mid-cycle, requiring “5+2” reinduction. The composite remission rate (complete remission and complete remission with incomplete neutrophil recovery) was 86% (nineteen of twenty-two patients; 90% CI 68–96%). Among those over age 65 and those with high-risk disease (secondary acute leukemia or cytogenetically high-risk disease), the composite remission rate was 88% and 100%, respectively. The median follow up was 13.5 months. Of those treated at the recommended phase 2 dose, the 12-month overall survival and progression-free survival were 62% (90% CI 33–81%) and 42% (90% CI 17–65%), respectively. Alisertib is well tolerated when combined with induction chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia, with a promising suggestion of efficacy. (clinicaltrials.gov Identifier:01779843).

Despite the reduction in cancer recurrence and mortality provided by therapies that target the estrogen receptor (ER), resistant ER+ breast cancer remains the most common cause of breast cancer death. Beyond mutations in ER in 25-30% of patients treated with aromatase inhibitors, which deplete circulating estrogen, our understanding of clinical mechanisms of resistance to agents that target the ER remains incomplete. We used whole exome sequencing (WES) of metastatic biopsies to identify mechanisms of resistance in patients with ER+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who had developed resistance to ER-directed agents, including aromatase inhibitors, tamoxifen, and fulvestrant. We noted mutations in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in metastatic biopsies from 12 patients out of 168. Of these, eight mutations had previously been described as activating. Examination of the treatment-naïve primary tumors in the five patients with activating mutants where WES from the matched treatment-naïve primary tumor was available revealed no evidence of pre-existing mutations in four of the five patients, suggesting that these four mutations were acquired under the selective pressure of ER-directed therapy. These acquired HER2 mutations were mutually exclusive with ER mutations, suggesting a distinct mechanism of resistance to ER-directed therapies. In vitro analysis through expression in ER+/HER2- cell lines confirmed that these mutations conferred estrogen independence. In addition, and in contrast to ER mutations, these HER2 mutations resulted in resistance to tamoxifen, fulvestrant, and the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib. The mutants result in increased AKT and ERK phosphorylation in ER+ cell lines, while simultaneously repressing ER levels and ER-dependent transcriptional targets. One mutation observed in two patients, S653C, occurring in the transmembrane domain and not previously observed in breast cancer, was shown to likely function through constitutive dimerization, a mechanism of activation not previously described for this mutation. Resistance caused by all four mutations was overcome by combining ER-directed therapy with the irreversible HER2 kinase inhibitor neratinib, suggesting a novel effective treatment strategy in these patients. Thus, we have shown that acquired activating HER2 mutations can confer endocrine resistance in ER+/HER2- breast cancer, and that such resistance can be effectively reversed by combination therapies that include an anti-HER2 inhibitor. Citation Format: Utthara Nayar, Ofir Cohen, Christian Kapstad, Adrienne Waks, Seth A. Wander, Corrie Painter, Samuel Freeman, Priyanka Ram, Nicole Persky, Lori Marini, Karla Helvie, Nelly Oliver, Cynthia X. Ma, Eric P. Winer, Nancy U. Lin, Nikhil Wagle. Acquired HER2 mutations in ER+ metastatic breast cancer confer resistance to ER-directed therapies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4952.

Antiestrogen therapies arrest susceptible estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancers by increasing p27. Since Src phosphorylates p27 to promote p27 proteolysis, Src activation observed in up to 40% of ER-positive cancers may contribute to antiestrogen resistance. In this article, we show that treatment with the Src-inhibitor saracatinib (AZD0530) together with ER-blocking drugs increased breast cancer cell cycle arrest via p27. Saracatinib and fulvestrant together more effectively increased p27, reduced Ki67, and impaired MDA-MB-361 xenograft tumor growth in vivo than either of the drugs alone. In contrast, saracatinib monotherapy rapidly gave rise to drug resistance. Since combined ER and Src inhibition delays development of resistance in vivo, these data support further clinical investigation of saracatinib in combination with fulvestrant for women with ER-positive breast cancer. Proteomic analysis revealed striking bypass activation of the mTOR pathway in saracatinib-resistant tumors. mTORC1 activation also arose following long-term culture of ER-positive breast cancer lines in the presence of saracatinib. These data indicate the utility of proteomic analysis of drug-resistant tumors to identify potential means of drug resistance. The use of mTOR kinase inhibitors with saracatinib may subvert drug resistance and prove to be more effective than saracatinib alone.

1054Background: HR+/HER2- primary breast tumors demonstrate less anti-tumor immune activity than HER2+ or triple-negative BC. However, minimal data exist about the TME of HR+/HER2- met tumors, part...

TPS1104Background: CDK4/6 inhibition (CDK4/6i) has a well-established role in the management of hormone receptor positive/HER2 negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The addition of a...

12016Background: Combining CDK4/6i with endocrine therapy results in prolongation of disease control in HR+ MBC, though resistance invariably occurs. There is a critical need to understand mechanis...

Consequences of the obesity epidemic on cancer morbidity and mortality are not fully appreciated. Obesity is a risk factor for many cancers, but the mechanisms by which it contributes to cancer development and patient outcome have yet to be fully elucidated. Here, we examined the effects of coculturing human-derived adipocytes with established and primary breast cancer cells on tumorigenic potential. We found that the interaction between adipocytes and cancer cells increased the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines. Prolonged culture of cancer cells with adipocytes or cytokines increased the proportion of mammosphere-forming cells and of cells expressing stem-like markers in vitro. Furthermore, contact with immature adipocytes increased the abundance of cancer cells with tumor-forming and metastatic potential in vivo. Mechanistic investigations demonstrated that cancer cells cultured with immature adipocytes or cytokines activated Src, thus promoting Sox2, c-Myc, and Nanog upregulation. Moreover, Sox2-dependent induction of miR-302b further stimulated cMYC and SOX2 expression and potentiated the cytokine-induced cancer stem cell–like properties. Finally, we found that Src inhibitors decreased cytokine production after coculture, indicating that Src is not only activated by adipocyte or cytokine exposures, but is also required to sustain cytokine induction. These data support a model in which cancer cell invasion into local fat would establish feed-forward loops to activate Src, maintain proinflammatory cytokine production, and increase tumor-initiating cell abundance and metastatic progression. Collectively, our findings reveal new insights underlying increased breast cancer mortality in obese individuals and provide a novel preclinical rationale to test the efficacy of Src inhibitors for breast cancer treatment. Cancer Res; 76(2); 491–504. ©2016 AACR.

The aurora kinases play an essential role in regulating mitosis and cell division. Over-expression of aurora kinases A and B has been associated with poor-risk features in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Preclinical studies suggest that small molecule aurora kinase inhibitors have activity in AML cell lines. Alisertib (MLN8237), a novel Aurora-A kinase inhibitor, has been generally well tolerated in early clinical trials of hematological malignancies, including AML. This study sought to evaluate tolerability of alisertib combined with standard “7+3” induction chemotherapy for AML. In this phase I, 3+3 cohort dose-escalation study, alisertib was administered with standard 7+3 induction for newly diagnosed AML. Those with acute promyelocytic leukemia or with AML and core-binding factor alterations were excluded. All patients received 7+3 induction (continuous infusion cytarabine 200mg/m2 x 7 days and intravenous idarubicin 12mg/m2 x 3 days), after which on day 8, alisertib was administered twice daily (BID) for 7 days. Dose escalation occurred via three cohorts (10mg BID, 20mg BID, 30mg BID). All underwent a mid-induction bone marrow biopsy, following the course of alisertib, to assess for residual disease, which if present, was to be treated with 5+2 re-induction (cytarabine 200mg/m2 x 5 days, idarubicin 12mg/m2 x 2 days) without alisertib. Following induction, up to four cycles of consolidation were allowed, using cytarabine (3g/m2 BID days 1,3,5 for those aged Currently, 14 patients are enrolled on study (n=3, 10mg BID; n=7, 20mg BID; n=4, 30mg BID). The median age was 62 (range 43-75); 9 (64%) were male, and all but 3 were Caucasian. One patient (7%) had therapy-related AML and six (43%) had underlying myelodysplasia. FLT3 mutations were detected in 3 (21%), NPM1 mutations in 2 (14%), CEBPA mutations in 2 (14%), and IDH1/IDH2 mutations in 4 patients (28.4%). One patient in cohort 2 died of sepsis, deemed unrelated to study drug, prior to completion of the toxicity assessment period and was replaced. Five patients have gone on to SCT. All patients received induction, 7 patients have undergone first consolidation, 3 a second consolidation, 2 a third consolidation, 1 a fourth consolidation, and 1 patient has started maintenance therapy. Alisertib has been well tolerated. All patients have experienced expected grade 4 toxicities of anemia, thrombocytopenia, and febrile neutropenia seen during the induction phase of treatment. At initial dose of 10mg BID, no dose-limited toxicities (DLTs) were encountered. In the 20mg BID cohort, one DLT was encountered, of delayed thrombocytopenia (G4 at day 40). The final cohort, at 30mg BID, is currently accruing (4 of 6 enrolled). No other DLTs have been detected, and other toxicities on study will be presented. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) will be established upon completion of this cohort. To date, 11 of 12 (92%) evaluable patients have achieved remission following induction (8 cases of CR and 3 of CRp). During the course of the study, one patient has experienced relapse, and none have died. Thirteen of 14 evaluable patients had an ablated mid-induction marrow biopsy, with the remaining patient showing 6% blasts in a 20% cellular marrow at mid-induction. None of the patients have undergone re-induction with 5+2 at mid-induction. We anticipate that the study will be fully enrolled and closed to further accrual by the time of presentation. Alisertib, a novel aurora A kinase inhibitor, appears to be well tolerated in conjunction with standard induction chemotherapy in newly diagnosed AML. Currently, 13 of 14 treated patients have demonstrated marrow ablation at the mid-induction point of therapy, and none have required re-induction with 5+2. Eleven of 12 evaluable patients have achieved remission following induction. These results suggest that alisertib is well-tolerated and may hold promise as a therapeutic agent in AML, when combined with induction chemotherapy. Ongoing efforts seek to define the MTD and establish appropriate dosing for phase II studies. Disclosures Fathi: Millennium: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Agios: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other. Attar:Agios: Employment.

p27 is a cell cycle regulator that acts largely to restrain normal cell growth. It is rarely mutated or deleted in human cancers, but is often degraded or mislocalized to the cytoplasm in aggressive tumors. Phosphorylation at T157 or T198 by different PI3K effector kinases leads to p27 cytoplasmic accumulation and enhanced cell motility and invasion in part via effects on the actin cytoskeleton, which are independent of its cell cycle role. However, the functional contributions of C-terminally phosphorylated, cytoplasmic p27 to cancer progression remain poorly understood. Targeted inhibition of PI3K/mTOR impaired tumor cell motility and metastasis via modulation of p27 in a bone metastatic model (Wander, S. et al. BCRT 2013). We observed that p27 knockdown in highly metastatic cancer lines with high levels of cytoplasmic p27pT157pT198 reverted EMT and impaired tumor cell invasion in vitro and metastasis in vivo. This led us to investigate whether PI3K-activated, phosphorylated p27 may function as a novel EMT regulator. A cell cycle defective (CK-) and double phosphomimetic p27 mutant (T157D/T198D or DD) was introduced into immortal human mammary epithelial cells with low PI3K activity. This revealed a novel, oncogenic function of p27 in regulating tumor progression, in that p27CK-DD induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and soft agar colony formation. p27CK-DD also increased motility, invasion and formation of metastasis in bladder and breast cancer models. A RT-PCR screen for potential p27-induced EMT mediators revealed a 20-fold increase in expression of the Twist1 transcription factor in p27CK-DD-transduced cells. Knockdown of Twist reversed the p27CK-DD-mediated increase in EMT marker expression. p27 knockdown rapidly attenuated Twist1-promoter activity and reduced Twist1 mRNA levels and also increased E-cadherin expression in metastatic cells, suggesting that Twist1 may play a critical role in p27CK-DD-induced EMT. These data extend our understanding of p27 function in human cancer and suggest that PI3K deregulated p27 may promote EMT and tumor metastasis through transcriptional activation of TWIST1. Citation Format: Dekuang Zhao, Alexandra H. Besser, Wen Zhou, Seth A. Wander, Jun Sun, Michael Durante, Feng Hong, Bin Wang, Tan Ince, Karoline Briegel, Joyce M. Slingerland. Cytoplasmic p27 promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition and tumor progression via Twist1 upregulation. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 1145. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-1145

The pleiotropic oncogenic effects of PI3K/mTOR have stimulated development of catalytic PI3K and mTOR inhibitors for the treatment of cancer. Present data provide a novel rationale for the use of dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitors to oppose tumor motility, invasion and metastasis. Cytoplasmic mislocalization of p27 is implicated as a key downstream driver of PI3K/mTOR-dependent tumor cell motility in vitro and bone metastatic outgrowth in vivo. Here, we report that PI3K/mTOR-kinase inhibition with PF-04691502 impairs breast cancer metastasis to bone, in part via effects on p27. Low-dose PF-04691502 impaired motility and invasion of highly PI3K/mTOR activated, bone-metastatic MDA-MB-1833 cells in vitro without affecting apoptosis or proliferation. Moreover, drug pre-treatment impaired bone metastasis in vivo. PF-04691502 decreased cytoplasmic p27pT157 and p27pT198, and p27T157D/T198D overexpression conferred resistance to inhibition of motility by PF-04691502. p27 knockdown in MDA-MB-1833 relieved RhoA-ROCK inhibition, decreased cell motility/invasion in vitro, and bone metastasis in vivo. p27 knockdown also reversed EMT phenotypic markers in MDA-MB-1833, as did PI3K/mTOR inhibition, demonstrating that p27 may be critical for maintenance of the EMT cellular program. Indeed, loss of cytoplasmic p27 reversed expression of an EMT gene profile supporting the notion that p27 acts as a key mediator of metastasis downstream of PI3K/mTOR. Cytoplasmic p27 in human cancers may prove to be a useful predictive marker to assess both PI3K/mTOR activation and the potential efficacy of catalytic PI3K/mTOR inhibitors. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2224. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-2224

CD44 surface expression is associated with self renewal in several cancers. While CD44+/CD24neg/low/ESA+ breast cancer subpopulations are enriched for cancer stem cells (CSC), the relative contributions of CD24 negative versus low subpopulations to stemness and metastasis is poorly defined. Here we show that CD44+/CD24low+ CSC give rise to CD44+/CD24neg progeny with reduced tumorigenicity and altered drug sensitivities. CD44+/CD24low+ subpopulations in MDA-MB-231 and in primary dissociated ER negative breast cancers show greater sphere and soft agar colony formation, Notch1 activation, Sox2 and Nanog expression and chemo resistance compared to CD44+/CD24neg. CD44+/CD24low+ can self-renew and give rise to CD44+/CD24neg cells, while CD44+/CD24neg progeny are exclusively CD44+/CD24neg. Tumorigenicity was increased and metastasis arose exclusively from orthotopic CD44+CD24low+ xenografts. CD44+/CD24low+ had greater expression of metastasis- and embryonic stem cell- associated and Notch pathway activated genes than CD44+/CD24neg cells. Moreover, MDA-MB-231 cells overexpressing Notch1 intracellular domain (N1-ICD) had higher Sox2 expression, and higher indices of CSC self-renewal (higher % CD44+/CD24low+, ALDH1 activity, sphere and soft agar colony formation), all of which were abrogated by Sox2 knockdown. Gamma secretase inhibition reduced ES-TFs and self-renewal in CD44+CD24low+ progenitors, but had no effect on proliferation or survival of CD44+CD24neg cells supporting further clinical development of Notch targeting drugs for cancer treatment in humans. Thus, CD44+CD24low+ and CD44+CD24neg CSC in ER negative breast cancer have distinct properties. CD44+CD24low+ can self-renew and generate CD44+CD24neg progeny. Orthotopic xenograft CD44+CD24low+ tumors arose with reduced latency with higher frequent, were larger, and the sole source of metastasis. Notch1 activation of Sox2 drives CD44+CD24low+ self-renewal and is blocked by GSI providing a strong rationale for use of GSI as CSC targeting agents in ER negative breast cancer. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3478. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-3478

While mutational loss of the p27 cell cycle regulatory protein is rare, oncogenic deregulation of p27 via accelerated degradation or mislocalization to the cytoplasm is commonly observed in human tumors. A growing body of evidence indicates that, when mislocalized to the cytoplasm, p27 promotes cell motility via RhoA-ROCK signaling inhibition. The present data explores the role of p27 in the regulation of both orthotopic mammary tumor growth and ectopic pulmonary metastasis in the MDA-MB-231-4175 model of malignant human breast cancer. The MDA-MB-231-4175 cell line (hereafter 4175) shows much greater metastasis to the lungs in murine xenograft models. Relative to the parental MDA-MB-231 cells, the metastatic 4175 derivative demonstrates activation of PI3K/mTOR signaling. These cells have elevated pmTOR, pAKTS473, pSGK1, and pRSK1. This results in increased total p27 and, when equal levels of total p27 are titrated, the highly metastatic 4175 cell line demonstrates extensive phosphorylation of p27 at the T157 and T198 sites. These sites have previously been implicated in the modulation of p27 localization and in the binding of p27 to RhoA. Thus, in the 4175 line, we demonstrate increased cytoplasmic p27, increased p27:RhoA binding, and impaired RhoA-ROCK signaling. This attenuation of RhoA activity correlates with increased migration (as measured by scratch assay) and increased invasion (as measured by modified transwell assay). Importantly, this hypermotility was abrogated by lentiviral knockdown of p27. Knockdown of p27 did not alter in vitro cell cycle profiles of either cell line as assessed by flow cytometry. The enhanced pulmonary tropism of the 4175 cell line was also abrogated in vivo following p27 knockdown: shRNAp27 reverts the lung metastatic phenotype of these cells back toward parental levels following tail vein injection in Balb/c nude female mice as assessed by IVIS imaging. Interestingly, orthotopic injection of these same lines, treated with the same lentivirus, into the mammary fat pad of Balb/c nude female mice produced a dramatically different result: shRNAp27 resulted in a significant increase in parental MDA-MB-231 tumor growth, while the metastatic derivative 4175 cells did not demonstrate a statistically meaningful change in orthotopic growth. These results indicate that, within the same cellular background, and in the same murine species, loss of p27 results in substantially different phenotypes depending upon the microenvironmental context: after tail vein injection cytoplasmic p27 plays a crucial role in promoting extravasation and colonization in the lung tissue; loss of p27 in this context impairs the metastatic process. Conversely, in the orthotopic environment, p27's pro-invasive role is not necessary to establish productive microenvironmental interactions and loss of p27 does not attenuate tumor growth. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2333. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-2333

Primary human breast cancer subpopulations with a CD44+ CD24NEG/LOW ESA+ phenotype exhibit self-renewal and generate xenograft tumors with as few as 100 cells in immunodeficient mice. While CD44 expression is strongly associated with self renewal in several cancers, the relative contributions of CD24 negative versus low subpopulations to stemness is poorly defined. Early reports have not distinguished negative from low CD24 expression in human lines and primary tumors, and both, together with CD44+ status have been linked to breast cancer stem cell phenotypes. In contrast, certain reports have associated CD24 expression with tumor progression and metastasis. Here, we show increased mitogenic kinase activation, expression of ESC and EMT genes in the CD24LOW subpopulation of CD44+ cells in both triple negative MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells and primary dissociated breast cancers (DTs) compared to the CD24NEG cells. Moreover, tumorigenicity was increased and metastasis arose exclusively from orthotopic xeno-implantation of the CD44+CD24LOW cells. MDA-MB-231 and two different primary DTs were live sorted into CD44+CD24NEG and CD44+CD24LOW enriched subpopulations. Cells expressing other putative stem cell markers, ALDH1 and ESA were almost entirely CD44+CD24LOW. CD44+CD24LOWcells showed higher PI3-kinase/Akt, MAPK, and Src activites compared to CD44+ CD24NEG cells. While both subpopulations formed soft agar colonies and/or mammospheres, those arising from CD44+CD24LOW were greater in number and size than from CD44+CD24NEG cells. When cultured in 2D after sorting, CD44+ CD24LOW cells gave rise to both CD44+ CD24LOW and CD44+ CD24NEG progeny while CD44+ CD24NEG yielded only CD44+ CD24NEG progeny. CD44+CD24LOW expressed higher levels of ESC genes and EMT-associated genes than CD44+CD24NEG cells and uniquely expressed stem cell-associated miRNAs. On orthotopic injection into BalbC nude mice, both subpopulations initiated tumors with as few as 100 cells, however tumors arising from CD44+CD24LOW cells had a shorter latency and grew more rapidly than those arising from CD44+CD24NEG cells. In vivo imaging of luciferase positive cells showed CD44+CD24LOW cells yield metastasis while CD44+CD24NEG cells did not. Our data demonstrate, for the first time, distinct biological properties between the CD44+CD24LOW and CD44+CD24NEG enriched subpopulations of MDA-MB-231 and primary human breast cancer DTs. Low surface expression of CD24 is associated with ALDH1 and ESA+ status, increased self-renewal as shown by mammosphere and colony formation, tumorigenicity and metastatic potential of CD44+ cells. The ability to isolate and characterize such TSC-enriched subpopulations will be necessary for development of therapeutic strategies that preferentially target breast cancer stem cells. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3335. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-3335