Search

Objectives Single-agent heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibition has demonstrated activity in oncogene-driven non-small cell and small cell lung cancers. SNX-5422 is an oral HSP90 inhibitor with increased activity in vitro with the addition of carboplatin and paclitaxel. Therefore, we conducted a phase 1, open-label, multicenter study to evaluate SNX-5422, carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by SNX-5422 maintenance in patients with advanced lung cancers. Materials and methods In part 1 (3 + 3 dose escalation), SNX-5422 (50/75/100-mg/m2) was dosed every other day (qod) for 21 days (28-day cycle) for ≤4 cycles; carboplatin (AUC 5)-paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) was administered once every 3 weeks for ≤6 courses. In part 2 (maintenance), subjects who achieved at least stable disease in part 1 received 100 mg/m2 SNX-5422 monotherapy qod for 21 days (28-day cycle). Results Twenty-three patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, n = 20) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC, n = 3) were enrolled. The median age was 60 years and 61% (n = 14/23) had ≥1 prior treatment regimens. The maximum tolerated dose of SNX-5422 was 100 mg/m2 qod in combination with carboplatin-paclitaxel. The most common treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events (part 1/part 2) were diarrhea (26%/15%) and nausea (9%/0%). In response-evaluable patients with NSCLC, 33% (6/18) had a partial response, 56% (10/18) stable disease, and 11% (2/18) progressive disease. Patients who remained on single-agent SNX-5422 maintenance therapy ≥2 months (n = 9) had cancers enriched for oncogenic drivers (n = 3 KRAS mutation, n = 1 EGFR exon 20 mutation, n = 1 HER2 mutation, and n = 1 RET fusion). Conclusions The triplet combination of SNX-5422, carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by maintenance SNX-5422 therapy was well-tolerated and showed anti-tumor activity. Cancers for which disease control on single-agent SNX-5422 maintenance was observed were enriched for oncogene-driven NSCLCs.

The development of leptomeningeal metastases is a poor prognostic factor in patients with advanced cancers.1–3 In non–small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs), median overall survival of patients from the diagnosis of leptomeningeal disease is 1 to 2 months without treatment and up to 8 months with systemic therapy.4–6 Furthermore, patients with leptomeningeal disease have historically had limited access to novel therapies in clinical trials. Recent efforts from many groups, including the European Society for Medical Oncology and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), have encouraged the inclusion of patients with leptomeningeal metastases in clinical trials, in addition to promoting standardization of intracranial response assessments.7–9 These efforts are crucial given that many investigational agents have substantial CNS activity and may improve outcomes in driver-positive cancers with leptomeningeal involvement.5,10 RET fusions are actionable oncogenic drivers that are identified in 1% to 2% of NSCLCs.11,12 To date,chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy remain the only approved systemic therapies for these cancers. Multikinase inhibitors with activity against RET (eg, cabozantinib or vandetanib) were repurposed to treat patients with RET fusion-positive lung cancers. Although these agents were found to be active in a subset of these patients, outcomes are modest compared with targeted therapies in other driver-positive lung cancers, and intracranial activity is poor.13,14 Selective RET inhibitors currently in development, such as LOXO-292 and BLU-667, have improved outcomes for patients with RET fusion-positive cancers because of increased potency and less offtarget toxicity.15,16 In September of 2018, LOXO-292 received Breakthrough Therapy designation from the FDA for treatment of patients with metastatic RET fusion-positive NSCLCs (as well as RET fusion-positive thyroid cancers and RET-mutant medullary thyroid cancer). In addition, confirmed intracranial responses and durable disease control have been achieved in patients with brain metastases in an ongoing phase I/II trial of LOXO-292 for patients with RET fusion-positive cancers.15 Its activity in leptomeningeal disease, however, has not previously been characterized. In this article, we describe a patient with a RET fusion-positive lung cancer with brain and leptomeningeal metastases who had an impactful intracranial response to selective RET inhibition with LOXO-292.

Background The tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) pathway controls appetite, balance, and pain sensitivity. While these functions are reflected in the on-target adverse events (AEs) observed with TRK inhibition, these AEs remain under-recognized, and pain upon drug withdrawal has not previously been reported. As TRK inhibitors are approved by multiple regulatory agencies for TRK or ROS1 fusion-positive cancers, characterizing these AEs and corresponding management strategies is crucial. Patients and methods Patients with advanced or unresectable solid tumors treated with a TRK inhibitor were retrospectively identified in a search of clinical databases. Among these patients, the frequency, severity, duration, and management outcomes of AEs including weight gain, dizziness or ataxia, and withdrawal pain were characterized. Results Ninety-six patients with 15 unique cancer histologies treated with a TRK inhibitor were identified. Weight gain was observed in 53% [95% confidence interval (CI), 43%–62%] of patients and increased with time on TRK inhibition. Pharmacologic intervention, most commonly with glucagon-like peptide 1 analogs or metformin, appeared to result in stabilization or loss of weight. Dizziness, with or without ataxia, was observed in 41% (95% CI, 31%–51%) of patients with a median time to onset of 2 weeks (range, 3 days to 16 months). TRK inhibitor dose reduction was the most effective intervention for dizziness. Pain upon temporary or permanent TRK inhibitor discontinuation was observed in 35% (95% CI, 24%–46%) of patients; this was more common with longer TRK inhibitor use. TRK inhibitor reinitiation was the most effective intervention for withdrawal pain. Conclusions TRK inhibition-related AEs including weight gain, dizziness, and withdrawal pain occur in a substantial proportion of patients receiving TRK inhibitors. This safety profile is unique relative to other anticancer therapies and warrants careful monitoring. These on-target toxicities are manageable with pharmacologic intervention and dose modification.

Survival outcomes for elderly lymphoma patients are disproportionally inferior to those of younger patients. We examined medication usage at diagnosis for 171 elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (median age 70 years) treated from 2009-2014. We found that 47% of patients used at least one potentially inappropriate medication according to the Beers Criteria, and 59% experienced treatment delays and/or dose reduction, and 65% experienced ≥ grade 3 treatment-related toxicities. We reported here for the first time that potentially inappropriate medication use was associated with reduced progression-free survival and overall survival, and increased ≥ grade 3 treatment-related toxicities in multivariate analysis.

Although next-generation sequencing (NGS) has brought insight into critical mutations or pathways (e.g., DNA damage sensing and repair) involved in the etiology of many cancers and has directed new screening, prevention, and therapeutic approaches for patients and families, it has only recently been used in malignant pleural mesotheliomas (MPMs).We analyzed the blood samples from patients with MPM using the NGS platform MSK-IMPACT to explore cancer-predisposing genes. The loss-of-function variants or pathogenic entries were identified, and clinicopathologic information was collected.Of 84 patients with MPM, 12% (10 of 84) had pathogenic variants. Clinical characteristics were similar between cohorts, although patients with germline pathogenic variants were more likely to have more than two first-degree family members with cancer than those without germline mutations (40% versus 12%; Fisher's exact test, p0.05). Novel, deleterious variants in mesotheliomas included MutS homolog 3 (1% [one of 84]; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0%-7%), breast cancer gene 1-associated ring domain 1 (1% [one of 84]; 95% CI: 0%-7%), and RecQ-like helicase 4 (2% [two of 84]; 95% CI: 0%-9%). Pathogenic variants previously reported on germline testing in patients with mesotheliomas were breast cancer gene 1-associated protein 1 (4% [three of 84]; 95% CI: 1%-10%), breast cancer gene 2 (1% [one of 84]; 95% CI: 0%-7%), and MRE11 homolog, double strand break repair nuclease (1% [one of 84]; 95% CI: 0%-7%). One patient (1% [one of 84]; 95% CI: 0%-7%) had a likely pathogenic alteration in SHQ1, H/ACA ribonucleoprotein assembly factor that has not been associated with a heritable susceptibility to cancer.Our study lends further support for the role of aberrations in DNA damage repair genes in the pathogenesis of MPMs and suggests that targeting the members of these pathways for screening and treatment warrants further study.

Introduction MNNG HOS Transforming gene (MET) amplification and MET exon 14 (METex14) alterations in lung cancers affect sensitivity to MET proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase (MET [also known by the alias hepatocyte growth factor receptor]) inhibitors. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), next-generation sequencing (NGS), and immunohistochemistry (IHC) have been used to evaluate MET dependency. Here, we have determined the association of MET IHC with METex14 mutations and MET amplification. Methods We collected data on a tri-institutional cohort from the Lung Cancer Mutation Consortium. All patients had metastatic lung adenocarcinomas and no prior targeted therapies. MET IHC positivity was defined by an H-score of 200 or higher using SP44 antibody. MET amplification was defined by copy number fold change of 1.8x or more with use of NGS or a MET-to–centromere of chromosome 7 ratio greater than 2.2 with use of FISH. Results We tested tissue from 181 patients for MET IHC, MET amplification, and METex14 mutations. Overall, 71 of 181 patients (39%) were MET IHC–positive, three of 181 (2%) were MET-amplified, and two of 181 (1%) harbored METex14 mutations. Of the MET-amplified cases, two were FISH positive with MET-to–centromere of chromosome 7 ratios of 3.1 and 3.3, one case was NGS positive with a fold change of 4.4x, and one of the three cases was MET IHC–positive. Of the 71 IHC-positive cases, one (1%) was MET-amplified and two (3%) were METex14-mutated. Of the MET IHC–negative cases, two of 110 (2%) were MET-amplified. Conclusions In this study, nearly all MET IHC–positive cases were negative for MET amplification or METex14 mutations. MET IHC can also miss patients with MET amplification. The limited number of MET-amplified cases in this cohort makes it challenging to demonstrate an association between MET IHC and MET amplification. Nevertheless, IHC appears to be an inefficient screen for these genomic changes. MET amplification or METex14 mutations can best be detected by FISH and a multiplex NGS panel.

9006 Background: MET exon 14 alterations comprise a novel class of lung cancer drivers. MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are active in patients with these cancers, but objective response rates (ORRs) are modest (~30%-40%). A subset of these cancers may harbor intrinsic resistance. Moreover, patients with initial benefit invariably develop acquired resistance. We set out to identify potential resistance mechanisms. Methods: We studied patients with stage IV MET exon 14-altered lung cancers who received a MET TKI. When feasible, tumor and/or plasma samples were collected, prioritizing paired pre- and post-TKI collection. Tumor samples underwent targeted mass spectrometry analysis (Nantomics) and DNA- (including MSK-IMPACT)/RNA-based (MSK-Fusion) next-generation sequencing (NGS). Plasma cfDNA underwent targeted NGS. ORR and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed (RECIST v1.1). Results: 74 patients received a MET TKI (1 TKI n = 55; ≥2 TKIs n = 19). 91% received crizotinib as their 1st TKI. Pre-TKI MET levels in tumor tissue (range 0-2120 amol/µg) were associated with outcomes: ORR 63% (n = 7/11) and median PFS 6.9 mos with detectable MET vs ORR 0% (n = 0/5) and median PFS 4.6 mos with undetectable MET (HR for PFS 0.3). Pre-TKI RAS pathway activation was associated with response: ORR 0% (n = 0/6) with KRAS/NF1/RASA1 mutation vs ORR 29% (n = 25/87) in others. Similar outcomes were observed with pre-TKI KRAS expression (n = 16, all with detectable KRAS levels): ORR 0% (n = 0/2) in KRAS ≥700 amol/µg vs ORR 50% (n = 7/14) < 700 amol/µg. Acquired resistance (Jackman criteria) was seen in 29 patients, 9 with paired pre-/post-treatment samples. On-target acquired resistance was found in 2/9 patients (22%): MET D1228N (n = 1), HGF amplification (n = 1). Potential off-target acquired resistance mechanisms were found in 5/9 pts (44%): KRAS G13V (n = 1), RASA1 S742* (n = 1), MDM2 amplification (n = 2), EGFR amplification (n = 1). Conclusions: Lack of MET expression or RAS pathway activation is associated with poor MET TKI outcomes in MET exon14-altered lung cancers. On-target acquired resistance is found in < 25% of patients; HGF amplification is a novel mechanism. Off-target intrinsic/acquired resistance may be mediated by RAS/MDM2/EGFR pathway activation.

In a systematic review by Ducic et al in this journal, the authors highlighted how important but underreported nerve injuries are after an abdominoplasty.1 Complications, such as chronic numbness or pain, can have extreme effects on a patient's life. Although the total risk of any nerve injury has been reported to be 1.94%, this is likely an underestimation given that around 7.67% of patients report post-procedural hypoesthesia. The most commonly injured nerve related to surgical incision was the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (1.36% of all patients). In contrast, there are only a handful of iliohypogastric nerve injuries resulting from abdominoplasties, representing 0.10% of all patients. Most notably, in their literature search, the authors were able to find only two reported cases of iliohypogastric nerve injuries in the literature. We hope to continue to bring attention to this underexplored adverse effect of abdominoplasty. We present the case of a 39-year-old woman with right lower quadrant abdominal pain …

129 Background: Survival outcomes for older patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) are disproportionally inferior to those of younger patients. While differences in tumor biology may play a role, older patients are often frail with comorbidities, polypharmacy, and use potentially inappropriate medications (PIM). Methods: Using Cox proportional hazard and logistic regression models, we retrospectively analyzed all aggressive NHL patients age 60 and older diagnosed and treated at our institution from 2009-2014 to examine the effect of polypharmacy and PIM use on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related toxicities. Results: We included 141 patients with evaluable data after excluding patients with incomplete record. The median age was 71 years. At the time of diagnosis, 44% of patients used more than 4 medications and 47% used at least one PIM. During first-line treatment, only 43% of patients received chemotherapy of adequate relative dose intensity (>85% scheduled dose), and 63% experienced grade 3 or greater toxicities. Age, International Prognostic Index, and PIM use correlated with each other. Number of medications (p = 0.005) and PIM use (p < 0.001) were associated with shortened PFS by log-rank test, and PIM use remained a strong independent predictor of PFS in multivariable analysis (HR 1.84, p = 0.005). Number of medications (p = 0.003) and PIM use (p = 0.009) were also associated with shortened OS by log-rank test, although only albumin level predicted OS in multivariable analysis. Most importantly, PIM use was strongly associated with grade 3 or greater toxicities in multivariable analysis (OR 7.4, p = 0.001). Conclusions: We report here for the first time adverse impacts of polypharmacy and PIM use in older patients with aggressive lymphoma. We suggest that drug-drug interactions may significantly impair the delivery of adequate chemotherapy dosage and increase toxicities thus resulting in inferior survival outcome. Our findings support the use of evidence-based geriatric and palliative care principles to guide meticulous medication management to eliminate outcome disparity in older lymphoma patients.

6562Background: Survival outcomes for elderly non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) patients are disproportionally inferior to those of younger patients. While their tumor biology may differ, elderly patien...

9042 Background: MET exon 14 alterations occur in ~3% of patients (pts) with NSCLC. Although clinical and genomic features of MET exon 14 mutant (mut) NSCLC are better characterized in the metastatic setting, less is known about early-stage disease for this molecular subtype. Methods: Clinicopathologic and genomic data were collected from patients (pts) with resected stage I-III MET exon 14 mutant NSCLC at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC). We estimated the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients from the date of surgical resection. The prevalence of MET exon 14 mutations in stage I-III NSCLC was assessed using OncoPanel NGS v3.0 at DFCI. Results: The prevalence of MET exon 14 alterations in resected tumors of pts with stage I-III NSCLC at DFCI using Oncopanel v3 was 2.8% (17/613) overall: 2.9% (16/542) in non-squamous and 1.4% (1/71) in squamous histology. We identified 131 pts with resected stage I-III (I = 73, II = 28, III = 30) MET exon 14 mut NSCLC at DFCI (Oncopanel v1-v3) and MSKCC (MSK-IMPACT), with a median age of 71 years (yrs) (range: 43-88). There were no significant differences in sex, smoking status, or type of MET alteration across stages. In stage I resected tumors there was a higher proportion of adenocarcinoma histology compared to stages II and III (p = 0.009). The median harmonized TMB (mTMB) was similar across stages (p = 0.43). Common genomic co-alterations included MET amplification (amp) (5.3%), CDK4/ 6 amp (19.1%), MDM2 amp (35.1%), TP53 mut (17.6%) and CDKN2A/ B loss (9.2%). The median DFS in stage I, II, and III NSCLC was 8.3 yrs (95% CI: 3.1-8.3), 2.6 yrs (95% CI: 1.0-2.6), and 2.1 yrs (95% CI: 0.7-2.7), respectively (p = 0.017). The median OS in stage I, II, and III NSCLC was 9.2 yrs (95% CI: 8.5 -10.5), not reached (NR) (95% CI: NR-NR), and 4.1 yrs (95% CI: 3.6-4.1), respectively (p = 0.052). Concurrent MET amp was independently associated with worse DFS (HR: 4.9, 95% CI: 1.8-13.1; p = 0.002) in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: MET exon 14 mutations are present in 2.8% of resected stage I-III NSCLCs. Given the prevalence of this molecular alteration in early-stage NSCLC, clinical trials exploring the role of adjuvant and neoadjuvant MET targeted therapies in this population may be warranted.