Search

Purpose: Previously, we developed breast cancer BRCA1-like and BRCA2-like copy-number profile shrunken centroid classifiers predictive for mutation status and response to therapy, targeting homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). Therefore, we investigated BRCA1- and BRCA2-like classification in ovarian cancer, aiming to acquire classifiers with similar properties as those in breast cancer. Experimental Design: We analyzed DNA copy-number profiles of germline BRCA1- and BRCA2-mutant ovarian cancers and control tumors and observed that existing breast cancer classifiers did not sufficiently predict mutation status. Hence, we trained new shrunken centroid classifiers on this set and validated them in the independent The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset. Subsequently, we assessed BRCA1/2-like classification and obtained germline and tumor mutation and methylation status of cancer predisposition genes, among them several involved in HR repair, of 300 ovarian cancer samples derived from the consecutive cohort trial AGO-TR1 (NCT02222883). Results: The detection rate of the BRCA1-like classifier for BRCA1 mutations and promoter hypermethylation was 95.6%. The BRCA2-like classifier performed less accurately, likely due to a smaller training set. Furthermore, three quarters of the BRCA1/2-like tumors could be explained by (epi)genetic alterations in BRCA1/2, germline RAD51C mutations and alterations in other genes involved in HR. Around half of the non–BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer cases displayed a BRCA-like phenotype. Conclusions: The newly trained classifiers detected most BRCA-mutated and methylated cancers and all tumors harboring a RAD51C germline mutations. Beyond that, we found an additional substantial proportion of ovarian cancers to be BRCA-like.

Purpose: BRCA1-deficient breast cancers carry a specific DNA copy-number signature (“BRCA1-like”) and are hypersensitive to DNA double-strand break (DSB) inducing compounds. Here, we explored whether (i) EZH2 is overexpressed in human BRCA1-deficient breast tumors and might predict sensitivity to DSB-inducing drugs; (ii) EZH2 inhibition potentiates cisplatin efficacy in Brca1-deficient murine mammary tumors. Experimental Design: EZH2 expression was analyzed in 497 breast cancers using IHC or RNA sequencing. We classified 370 tumors by copy-number profiles as BRCA1-like or non-BRCA1–like and examined its association with EZH2 expression. Additionally, we assessed BRCA1 loss through mutation or promoter methylation status and investigated the predictive value of EZH2 expression in a study population of breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant high-dose platinum-based chemotherapy compared with standard anthracycline-based chemotherapy. To explore whether EZH2 inhibition by GSK126 enhances sensitivity to platinum drugs in EZH2-overexpressing breast cancers we used a Brca1-deficient mouse model. Results: The highest EZH2 expression was found in BRCA1-associated tumors harboring a BRCA1 mutation, BRCA1-promoter methylation or were classified as BRCA1 like. We observed a greater benefit from high-dose platinum-based chemotherapy in BRCA1-like and non-BRCA1–like patients with high EZH2 expression. Combined treatment with the EZH2 inhibitor GSK126 and cisplatin decreased cell proliferation and improved survival in Brca1-deficient mice in comparison with single agents. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that EZH2 is expressed at significantly higher levels in BRCA1-deficient breast cancers. EZH2 overexpression can identify patients with breast cancer who benefit significantly from intensified DSB-inducing platinum-based chemotherapy independent of BRCA1-like status. EZH2 inhibition improves the antitumor effect of platinum drugs in Brca1-deficient breast tumors in vivo.

The efficacy of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer ( TNBC ) is low1–5, highlighting a need for strategies that render the tumor microenvironment more sensitive to PD-1 blockade. Preclinical research has suggested immunomodulatory properties for chemotherapy and irradiation6–13. In the first stage of this adaptive, non-comparative phase 2 trial, 67 patients with metastatic TNBC were randomized to nivolumab (1) without induction or with 2-week low-dose induction, or with (2) irradiation (3 × 8 Gy), (3) cyclophosphamide, (4) cisplatin or (5) doxorubicin, all followed by nivolumab. In the overall cohort, the objective response rate (ORR; iRECIST14) was 20%. The majority of responses were observed in the cisplatin (ORR 23%) and doxorubicin (ORR 35%) cohorts. After doxorubicin and cisplatin induction, we detected an upregulation of immune-related genes involved in PD-1–PD-L1 (programmed death ligand 1) and T cell cytotoxicity pathways. This was further supported by enrichment among upregulated genes related to inflammation, JAK–STAT and TNF-α signaling after doxorubicin. Together, the clinical and translational data of this study indicate that short-term doxorubicin and cisplatin may induce a more favorable tumor microenvironment and increase the likelihood of response to PD-1 blockade in TNBC. These data warrant confirmation in TNBC and exploration of induction treatments prior to PD-1 blockade in other cancer types. A pick-the-winner clinical trial design in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer shows that immune induction with doxorubicin or cisplatin may improve clinical responses to PD-1 blockade and induce a more favorable tumor microenvironment.

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the second most common type of breast cancer after invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), accounting for approximately 10-15% of all breast tumors. ILC is characterized by inactivation of E-Cadherin and neoplastic cells that invade the stroma in a "single-file" pattern. Women with ILC are usually older, have used hormone replacement therapy and are more likely to have hormone receptor–positive disease. ILCs have similar survival to IDCs at both five and 10 years, but despite this, the clinical course is distinct: ILCs are three times more likely to metastasize to the peritoneum, gastrointestinal tract, and ovaries and are more frequently bilateral. Therefore, tailored therapeutic options for this distinct, hard-to-treat subtype of breast cancer are required. As part of the RATHER FP7 HEALTH consortium (www.ratherproject.com), we carried out RNA-Seq analysis of 61 primary ILC samples and identified that high expression of the BET family protein Brd3 (uniquely among BRD family members) was associated with poor recurrence free survival (p=0.03, HR 8.63, CI 1.22-60.85). This observation was further validated in the independent METABRIC cohort (n=99), where again, high Brd3 expression (and not other BRD members) was associated with poor recurrence-free survival (p With a number of BET inhibitors now entering clinical trials, the data described here suggest that BET inhibition is a rational therapeutic option for some ILC cases, and for those that do not respond, combination with venetoclax may be a suitable therapeutic strategy. In our cell line models, baseline Bcl-2 expression was sufficient to predict induction of apoptosis in response to JQ1 and could be used to guide therapeutic choice. These results should now be investigated in vivo before a prospective clinical trial. This material is based upon works supported by the Irish Cancer Society Collaborative Cancer Research Centre BREAST-PREDICT Grant CCRC13GAL" and the SFi CDA Award 15/CDA/3438 Citation Format: O'Connor DP, Walsh L, Fan Y, Tarrant F, Chin S-F, Schouten P, Caldas C, Bernards R, Ni Chonghaile T, Gallagher WM. Bromodomain inhibitors for the treatment of invasive lobular carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-09-02.

Purpose: The BRCA1-like profile identifies tumors with a defect in homologous recombination due to inactivation of BRCA1. This profile has been shown to predict which stage III breast cancer patients benefit from myeloablative, DNA double-strand-break-inducing chemotherapy. We tested the predictive potential of the BRCA1-like profile for adjuvant non-myeloablative, intensified dose-dense chemotherapy in the GAIN trial. Methods: Lymph node positive breast cancer patients were randomized to 3 × 3 dose-dense cycles of intensified epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide (ETC) or 4 cycles concurrent epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by 10 cycles of weekly paclitaxel combined with 4 cycles capecitabine (EC-TX). Only triple negative breast cancer patients (TNBC) for whom tissue was available were included in these planned analyses. BRCA1-like or non-BRCA1-like copy number profiles were derived from low coverage sequencing data. Results: 119 out of 163 TNBC patients (73%) had a BRCA1-like profile. After median follow-up of 83 months, disease free survival (DFS) was not significantly different between BRCA1-like and non-BRCA1-like patients [adjusted hazard ratio (adj.HR) 1.02; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55–1.86], neither was overall survival (OS; adj.HR 1.26; 95% CI 0.58–2.71). When split by BRCA1-like status, DFS and OS were not significantly different between treatments. However, EC-TX seemed to result in a trend to an improvement in DFS in patients with a BRCA1-like tumor, while the reverse accounted for ETC treatment in patients with a non-BRCA1-like tumor (p for interaction = 0.094). Conclusions: The BRCA1-like profile is not associated with survival benefit for a non-myeloablative, intensified regimen in this study population. Considering the limited cohort size, capecitabine might have additional benefit for TNBC patients.

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the second most common type of breast cancer after invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), accounting for approximately 10-15% of all breast tumors. ILC is characterized by inactivation of E-Cadherin and neoplastic cells that invade the stroma in a "single-file" pattern. Women with ILC are usually older, have used hormone replacement therapy and are more likely to have hormone receptor–positive disease. ILCs have similar survival to IDCs at both five and 10 years, but despite this, the clinical course is distinct: ILCs are three times more likely to metastasize to the peritoneum, gastrointestinal tract, and ovaries and are more frequently bilateral. Therefore, tailored therapeutic options for this distinct, hard-to-treat subtype of breast cancer are required. As part of the RATHER FP7 HEALTH consortium (www.ratherproject.com), we carried out RNA-Seq analysis of 61 primary ILC samples and identified that high expression of the BET family protein Brd3 was associated with poor recurrence free survival (p=0.03, HR 8.63, CI 1.22-60.85). This observation was further validated in the independent METABRIC cohort (n=99), where again, high Brd3 expression was associated with poor recurrence-free survival (p With a number of BET inhibitors now entering clinical trials, the data described here suggest that BET inhibition is a rational therapeutic option for some ILC cases, and for those that do not respond, combination with venetoclax may be a suitable therapeutic strategy. In our cell line models, baseline Bcl-2 expression was sufficient to predict induction of apoptosis in response to JQ1 and could be used to guide therapeutic choice. These results should now be investigated in vivo before a prospective clinical trial. "This material is based upon works supported by the Irish Cancer Society Collaborative Cancer Research Centre BREAST-PREDICT Grant CCRC13GAL". Citation Format: O'Connor DP, Walsh L, Tarrant F, Chin S-F, Schouten P, Linn S, Bernards R, Caldas C, Gallagher WM, ni Chonghaile T. Bromodomain inhibitors represent a rational therapeutic option for the treatment of invasive lobular carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-11-06.

Effective treatment of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) of the breast is hampered by late detection, invasive growth, distant metastasis, and poor response to chemotherapy. Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling, one of the major druggable oncogenic signaling networks, is frequently activated in ILC. We investigated treatment response and resistance to AZD8055, an inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), in the K14-cre;Cdh1Flox/Flox;Trp53Flox/Flox (KEP) mouse model of metastatic ILC. Inhibition of mTOR signaling blocked the growth of primary KEP tumors as well as the progression of metastatic disease. However, primary tumors and distant metastases eventually acquired resistance after long-term AZD8055 treatment, despite continued effective suppression of mTOR signaling in cancer cells. Interestingly, therapeutic responses were associated with increased expression of genes related to antigen presentation. Consistent with this observation, increased numbers of tumor-infiltrating major histocompatibility complex class II-positive (MHCII+) immune cells were observed in treatment-responsive KEP tumors. Acquisition of treatment resistance was associated with loss of MHCII+ cells and reduced expression of genes related to the adaptive immune system. The therapeutic efficacy of mTOR inhibition was reduced in Rag1−/- mice lacking mature T and B lymphocytes, compared to immunocompetent mice. Furthermore, therapy responsiveness could be partially rescued by transplanting AZD8055-resistant KEP tumors into treatment-naïve immunocompetent hosts. Collectively, these data indicate that the PI3K signaling pathway is an attractive therapeutic target in invasive lobular carcinoma, and that part of the therapeutic effect of mTOR inhibition is mediated by the adaptive immune system.

Predictive biomarkers can guide treatment decisions in breast cancer. Many studies are undertaken to discover and translate these biomarkers, yet few biomarkers make it to practice. Before use in clinical decision making, predictive biomarkers need to demonstrate analytical validity, clinical validity and clinical utility. While attaining analytical and clinical validity is relatively straightforward, by following methodological recommendations, the achievement of clinical utility is extremely challenging. It requires demonstrating three associations: the biomarker with the outcome (prognostic association), the effect of treatment independent of the biomarker, and the differential treatment effect between the prognostic and the predictive biomarker (predictive association). In addition, economical, ethical, regulatory, organizational and patient/doctor-related aspects are hampering the translational process. Traditionally, these aspects do not receive much attention until formal approval or reimbursement of a biomarker test (informed by Health Technology Assessment (HTA)) is at stake, at which point the clinical utility and sometimes price of the test can hardly be influenced anymore. When HTA analyses are performed earlier, during biomarker research and development, they may prevent further development of those biomarkers unlikely to ever provide sufficient added value to society, and rather facilitate translation of the promising ones. Early HTA is particularly relevant for the predictive biomarker field, as expensive medicines are under pressure and the need for biomarkers to guide their appropriate use is huge. Closer interaction between clinical researchers and HTA experts throughout the translational research process will ensure that available data and methodologies will be used most efficiently to facilitate biomarker translation.

Background: The BRCA1-like copy number (CN) profile can be used as a biomarker to predict which stage III breast cancer patients benefit from myeloablative, DNA double-strand-break (DSB)-inducing chemotherapy. In addition, a BRCA1-like gene expression classifier, derived from the BRCA1-like CN profile, can predict which patient group will achieve an increased pathological complete remission rate on a standard neoadjuvant regimen complemented with carboplatin/veliparib. A non-myeloablative, dose-dense schedule of epirubicin, paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide (ETC) is used in the clinic to treat stage III patients. Since ETC contains an intensified dose of DNA DSB-inducing cyclophosphamide, we tested the BRCA1-like CN profile as a predictive biomarker for ETC benefit in the GAIN trial. Methods: The GAIN trial was a prospective, multi-center, non-blinded, randomized phase III trial. Eligibility comprised histologically confirmed invasive breast cancer with at least one positive axillary or internal mammary lymph node and no signs of distant metastases. The allocated adjuvant treatment was intensified chemotherapy with sequential E (150 mg/m2), T (225 mg/m2) and C (2500, after amendment 2000 mg/m2) each 3 cycles every 2 weeks (ETC) or concurrent E (112.5 mg/m2) and C (600 mg/m2) for 4 cycles every 2 weeks followed by 10 cycles of weekly T (67.5 mg/m2) combined with 4 cycles of capecitabine (2000mg/m2) on day 1-14 in a 3-weekly cycle (EC-TX). Only the triple negative patients were used for these analyses. For samples with good quality DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue, a library was prepared and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq2000 platform. Copy number estimates were extracted from the sequence data by normalizing GC-content and mappability corrected read counts to the average read count. These CN profiles were classified as either BRCA1-like or non-BRCA1-like using a previously established shrunken centroid classifier with an established cut-off. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, the difference in survival was analysed using log-rank tests. Multivariate analyses were done by generating Cox regression models with important prognostic factors. Results: Out of 424 triple negative patients, 166 patients with available tissue and a tumour cell content of at least 60% were analysed for BRCA1-like status and included in the analyses (classified as BRCA1-like: n=122). Based on clinicopathological characteristics, these patients were similar to the total group of triple negative participants. In the BRCA1-like patients, there was no significant difference in DFS or OS between ETC and EC-TX (log-rank tests n.s.). In accordance, Cox regression models confirmed these findings. Conclusion: In contrast to the predictive value of the BRCA1-like profile in myeloablative chemotherapy, it could not predict survival benefit for a non-myeloablative, non-platinum-/veliparib-containing regimen in this study population. An intensified dose of cyclophosphamide resulted in similar outcomes in BRCA1-like patients as addition of capecitabine to standard chemotherapy. These results help to define the appropriate application of the BRCA1-like profile as a predictive biomarker. Citation Format: van Rossum AGJ, Schouten PC, Weber KE, Nekljudova V, Denkert C, von Minckwitz G, Karn T, Möbus VJ, Linn SC, Loibl S, Marmé F. BRCA1-like profile as predictive biomarker in non myeloablative chemotherapy (GAIN study). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-07-28.

Purpose: The elevated levels of somatic copy-number alterations (SCNAs) in a subset of high-risk endometrial cancers are suggestive of defects in pathways governing genome integrity. We sought to assess the prevalence of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) in endometrial cancers and its association with histopathologic and molecular characteristics. Experimental Design: Fresh tumor tissue was prospectively collected from 36 endometrial cancers, and functional HRD was examined by the ability of replicating tumor cells to accumulate RAD51 protein at DNA double-strand breaks (RAD51 foci) induced by ionizing radiation. Genomic alterations were determined by next-generation sequencing and array comparative genomic hybridization/SNP array. The prevalence of BRCA-associated genomic scars, a surrogate marker for HRD, was determined in the The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) endometrial cancer cohort. Results: Most endometrial cancers included in the final analysis (n = 25) were of non-endometrioid (52%), grade 3 (60%) histology, and FIGO stage I (72%). HRD was observed in 24% (n = 6) of cases and was restricted to non-endometrioid endometrial cancers (NEEC), with 46% of NEECs being HRD compared with none of the endometrioid endometrial cancers (EEC, P = 0.014). All but 1 of the HRD cases harbored either a pathogenic BRCA1 variant or high somatic copy-number (SCN) losses of HR genes. Analysis of TCGA cases supported these results, with BRCA-associated genomic scars present in up to 48% (63/132) of NEEC versus 12% (37/312) of EEC (P < 0.001). Conclusions: HRD occurs in endometrial cancers and is largely restricted to non-endometrioid, TP53-mutant endometrial cancers. Evaluation of HRD may help select patients that could benefit from treatments targeting this defect, including platinum compounds and PARP inhibitors.

Genomic aberrations can be used to subtype breast cancer. In this study, we investigated DNA copy number (CN) profiles of 69 cases of male breast cancer (MBC) by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) to detect recurrent gains and losses in comparison with female breast cancers (FBC). Further, we classified these profiles as BRCA1-like, BRCA2-like or non-BRCA-like profiles using previous classifiers derived from FBC, and correlated these profiles with pathological characteristics. We observed large CN gains on chromosome arms 1q, 5p, 8q, 10p, 16p, 17q, and chromosomes 20 and X. Large losses were seen on chromosomes/chromosome arms 1p, 6p, 8p, 9, 11q, 13, 14q, 16q, 17p, and 22. The pattern of gains and losses in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) MBC was largely similar to ER+ FBC, except for gains on chromosome X in MBC, which were uncommon in FBC. Out of 69 MBC patients, 15 patients (22%) had a BRCA2-like profile, of which 2 (3%) were also BRCA1-like. One patient (1%) was only BRCA1-like; the remaining 53 (77%) patients were classified as non-BRCA-like. BRCA2-like cases were more often p53 accumulated than non-BRCA-like cases (P = 0.014). In conclusion, the pattern of gains and losses in ER+ MBC was largely similar to that of its ER+ FBC counterpart, except for gains on chromosome X in MBC, which are uncommon in FBC. A significant proportion of MBC has a BRCA2-like aCGH profile, pointing to a potentially hereditary nature, and indicating that they could benefit from a drug regimen targeting BRCA defects as in FBC.

Triple negative (TN) breast cancers make up some 15% of all breast cancers. Approximately 10–15% are mutant for the tumor suppressor, BRCA1. BRCA1 is required for homologous recombination‐mediated DNA repair and deficiency results in genomic instability. BRCA1‐mutated tumors have a specific pattern of genomic copy number aberrations that can be used to classify tumors as BRCA1‐like or non‐BRCA1‐like. BRCA1 mutation, promoter methylation, BRCA1‐like status and genome‐wide expression data was determined for 112 TN breast cancer samples with long‐term follow‐up. Mutation status for 21 known DNA repair genes and PIK3CA was assessed. Gene expression and mutation frequency in BRCA1‐like and non‐BRCA1‐like tumors were compared. Multivariate survival analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. BRCA1 germline mutation was identified in 10% of patients and 15% of tumors were BRCA1 promoter methylated. Fifty‐five percent of tumors classified as BRCA1‐like. The functions of genes significantly up‐regulated in BRCA1‐like tumors included cell cycle and DNA recombination and repair. TP53 was found to be frequently mutated in BRCA1‐like (P, Highlights Triple negative breast cancers subdivide into 2 groups: BRCA1‐like, non‐BRCA1‐like.In a retrospective analysis, patients with BRCA1‐like tumors have a worse outcome.Mutation and gene expression patterns reveal potential therapy targets in subgroups.

Background: Patients with BRCA1-like tumors correlate with improved response to DNA double-strand break-inducing therapy. A gene expression-based classifier was developed to distinguish between BRCA1-like and non-BRCA1-like tumors. We hypothesized that these tumors may also be more sensitive to PARP inhibitors than standard treatments.Methods: A diagnostic gene expression signature (BRCA1ness) was developed using a centroid model with 128 triple-negative breast cancer samples from the EU FP7 RATHER project. This BRCA1ness signature was then tested in HER2-negative patients (n = 116) from the I-SPY 2 TRIAL who received an oral PARP inhibitor veliparib in combination with carboplatin (V-C), or standard chemotherapy alone. We assessed the association between BRCA1ness and pathologic complete response in the V-C and control arms alone using Fisher's exact test, and the relative performance between arms (biomarker × treatment interaction, likelihood ratio p Results: We developed a gene expression signature to identify BRCA1-like status. In the I-SPY 2 neoadjuvant setting the BRCA1ness signature associated significantly with response to V-C (p = 0.03), but not in the control arm (p = 0.45). We identified a significant interaction between BRCA1ness and V-C (p = 0.023) after correcting for HR.Conclusions: A genomic-based BRCA1-like signature was successfully translated to an expression-based signature (BRC1Aness). In the I-SPY 2 neoadjuvant setting, we determined that the BRCA1ness signature is capable of predicting benefit of V-C added to standard chemotherapy compared to standard chemotherapy alone.Trial registration: I-SPY 2 TRIAL beginning December 31, 2009: Neoadjuvant and Personalized Adaptive Novel Agents to Treat Breast Cancer (I-SPY 2), NCT01042379.

3118 Background: The PARP-inhibitor olaparib has single-agent activity in BRCA mutated breast and ovarian cancer. Preclinical studies show synergistic effects when combining PARP-inhibitors and platinum drugs in BRCA1/2 mutated cancer cell models. A formulation change from olaparib capsules to tablets initiated a new dose finding study of olaparib tablets BID continuously with carboplatin. Methods: Patients were included in a 3+3 dose-escalation schedule in the following dose-levels: olaparib 25mg BID and carboplatin AUC 3 d1/d22, olaparib 25mg BID and carboplatin AUC 4 d1/d22, olaparib 50mg BID and carboplatin AUC4 d1/d22, olaparib 75mg and carboplatin AUC 4 d1/d22 and olaparib 100mg BID and carboplatin AUC 4 d1/d22. After two cycles patients continued olaparib 300mg BID as monotherapy. Primary objective was to assess the Maximum Tolerable Dose (MTD). Secondary objectives were to investigate the preliminary response rate, pharmacodynamics and systemic exposure. Results: In total 24 patients were included with breast cancer (n = 18), ovarian cancer (n = 3), melanoma (n = 1), colorectal cancer (n = 1) and esophageal cancer (n = 1). Nineteen out of 24 patients had a germline BRCA mutation (79%). Most common AEs were nausea (46%), fatigue (33%) and platelet count decrease (33%). The majority of AEs (83%) were grade 1/2 in severity. Because two dose-limiting toxicities (consisting of ≥ 7 days dose delay of cycle 2 or missing ≥ 5 doses of olaparib due to hematologic toxicity) occurred in dose-level 4, dose-level 3 (olaparib 75mg and carboplatin AUC 4; n = 6 patients) was determined to be the MTD. Fourteen out of 24 patients (56%) had a partial response as best response, according to RECIST 1.1. Systemic exposure of the olaparib tablet formulation appeared comparable to the previous capsule formulation with an olaparib tablet AUC0-14 of 16.3 μg/ml*h at MTD. PARP activity in PBMCs was decreased by 98.7% ± 0.14% at day eight compared to day one for dose-level 3. Conclusions: Olaparib tablets 75mg BID and carboplatin AUC 4 for two cycles preceding olaparib monotherapy is a feasible and tolerable treatment schedule with encouraging clinical antitumor activity. Clinical trial information: NCT02418624.

The development of drug-biomarker combinations holds promise for tailoring treatment for patients with cancer on the basis of the biology of the tumor exemplified by estrogen receptor expression and blockade and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 targeting. Approximately 85% of breast cancers have a target for therapy, but triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) do not. Although trials have focused on identifying the most efficacious anticancer drug (regimen) for this subtype, it may be that predictive biomarkers are required to guide treatment choices because of the intrinsic heterogeneity of TNBCs. Molecular characterizations have demonstrated a strong association between TNBCs and BRCA1 mutations. Preclinical mechanistic insight indicated that tumor cells with a defect in BRCA1 have impaired homologous recombination (HR), the only error-free pathway of repair of interstrand crosslinks. Cells with impaired HR display sensitivity to agents that induce such lesions. In the general breast cancer population, platinum agents that cause interstrand crosslinks are not preferred over other treatment regimens. However, given the possibility that TNBCs are enriched for such a targetable HR deficiency (HRD), platinum has attracted renewed interest as has been shown in recently published articles. Furthermore, TNBCs may be enriched for BRCA1 mutations and also for a larger group of nonmutated tumors that exhibit HRD. The use of platinum in TNBCs with biomarker analyses has been investigated in the two articles that accompany this editorial. Telli et al neoadjuvantly treated patients with triple-negative or BRCA1/ 2-associated breast cancer with a regimen containing gemcitabine, carboplatin, and iniparib in the PrECOG 0105 trial. Overall, a pathologic complete remission rate of 36% and acceptable toxicity of the regimen were reported. Isakoff et al conducted a phase II trial with cisplatin or carboplatin in patients with metastatic TNBC (TBCRC009; Platinum for Triple-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer and Evaluation of p63/p73 as a Biomarker of Response). The overall response rate was 25%. Both studies reproduce previous findings of efficacy of a platinum-based regimen or platinum alone in TNBC. However, only a subset of patients in these trials derived clinical benefit. Therefore, secondary investigations may help identify biomarkers that associate with a preferential benefit from use of a platinum regimen, which may help guide therapy decisions. Both studies report their analysis of BRCA germline mutation status as well as potential biomarkers for assessing HRD, specifically the HRD loss of heterozygosity (HRD-LOH) score and the HRD large-scale transition (HRD-LST) score. Both markers evaluate so-called genomic scars as signatures of aberrations that can be observed from singlenucleotide polymorphism array–based sequencing or similar technologies and that are associated with defects in error-free repair of interstrand crosslinks. The HRD-LOH score counts the numbers of LOH regions larger than 15 MB but smaller than chromosome size, whereas the HRD-LST score counts the number of breaks between adjacent segments of at least 10 MB. Cutoffs were trained to best separate tumors that had a known deleterious aberration in BRCA1/2 from those that did not. In both studies, patients with a BRCA germline mutation had higher response rates than the general cohort, and the HRD scores highly correlated with BRCA1/2 germline mutations and response rates. In addition, Telli et al identified BRCA1 methylation in nonmutated tumors with high HRD-LOH score, which suggests that these scores identify a subgroup of patients who could benefit from therapy that targets their HRD. Unfortunately, single-arm phase II studies do not allow proper evaluation of a biomarker as a predictor of response to therapy, and they offer limited insight on how to exploit the observed association with outcome of BRCA-associated biomarkers (Fig 1). Thus, the studies by Telli et al and Isakoff et al join several other articles published over the last decade that have reported on the potential promise of BRCA-associated HRD biomarkers but did not provide definitive data on clinical utility. It has been established that the optimal biomarker trial design requires biomarker-positive and -negative patients and patients who have been treated with and without the therapy of interest to evaluate both prognostic and predictive signals. If not included in the phase II design, such a control group could be added. Hence, the lack of a control arm in these two new studies is indeed a major limitation of their findings. In contrast, the TNT trial (Triple Negative Breast Cancer Trial, recently reported as an abstract) was able to more appropriately evaluate the use of HRD biomarkers, at least in patients with advanced disease. In that trial, patients with locally advanced or metastatic TNBC were randomly assigned to therapy with carboplatin at area under the [concentration-time] curve 6 or standardof-care docetaxel. Of great interest, among the 376 patients in that study, 29 were known to be BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers (including 13 who had estrogen receptor–positive, HER2-negative disease). Prespecified analyses specifically addressed populations JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY E D I T O R I A L VOLUME 33 NUMBER 17 JUNE 1

Specific clinical questions rise when patients, who are diagnosed with breast cancer, are at risk of carrying a mutation in BRCA1 and -2 gene due to a strong family history or young age at diagnosis. These questions concern topics such as 1. Timing of genetic counseling and testing, 2. Choices to be made for BRCA1 or -2 mutation carriers in local treatment, contralateral treatment, (neo)adjuvant systemic therapy, and 3. The psychological effects of rapid testing. The knowledge of the genetic status might have several advantages for the patient in treatment planning, such as the choice whether or not to undergo mastectomy and/or prophylactic contralateral mastectomy. The increased risk of developing a second breast cancer in the ipsilateral breast in mutation carriers, is only slightly higher after primary cancer treatment, than in the general population. Prophylactic contralateral mastectomy provides a substantial reduction of contralateral breast cancer, although only a small breast cancer specific survival benefit. Patients should be enrolled in clinical trials to investigate (neo)-adjuvant drug regimens, that based on preclinical and early clinical evidence might be targeting the homologous recombination defect, such as platinum compounds and PARP inhibitors. If rapid testing is performed, the patient can make a well-balanced decision. Although rapid genetic counseling and testing might cause some distress, most women reported this approach to be worthwhile. In this review the literature regarding these topics is evaluated. Answers and suggestions, useful in clinical practice are discussed.

Research towards biomarkers that predict patient outcome in colorectal cancer (CRC) is rapidly expanding. However, none of these biomarkers have been recommended by the American Association of Clinical Oncology or the European Group on Tumor Markers. Current staging criteria result in substantial under- and over-treatment of CRC patients. Evasion of apoptosis, a characteristic feature of tumorigenesis, is known to correlate with patient outcome. We reviewed the literature on immunohistochemistry-based studies between 1998 and 2011 describing biomarkers in this pathway in CRC and identified 26 markers. Most frequently described were p53, Bcl-2, survivin, and the Fas and TRAILR1 receptors and their ligands. None of the studies reviewed provided sufficient support for implementing a single marker into current clinical practice. This is likely due to the complex biology of this pathway. We suggest focusing on the combination of key markers within the apoptosis pathway that together represent an ‘apoptotic tumor profile’, which better reflects the status of this pathway in a tumor.

Previously, we employed bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) profiles from BRCA1 and -2 mutation carriers and sporadic tumours to construct classifiers that identify tumour samples most likely to harbour BRCA1 and -2 mutations, designated 'BRCA1 and -2-like' tumours, respectively. The classifiers are used in clinical genetics to evaluate unclassified variants, and patients for which no good quality germline DNA is available. Furthermore, we have shown that breast cancer patients with BRCA-like tumour aCGH profiles benefit substantially from platinum-based chemotherapy, potentially due to their inability to repair DNA double strand breaks (DSB), providing a further important clinical application for the classifiers. The BAC array technology has been replaced with oligonucleotide arrays. To continue clinical use of existing classifiers, we mapped oligonucleotide aCGH data to the BAC domain, such that the oligonucleotide profiles can be employed as in the BAC classifier. We demonstrate that segmented profiles derived from oligonucleotide aCGH show high correlation with BAC aCGH profiles. Furthermore, we trained a support vector machine score to objectify aCGH profile quality. Using the mapped oligonucleotide aCGH data, we show equivalence in classification of biologically relevant cases between BAC and oligonucleotide data. Furthermore, the predicted benefit of DSB inducing chemotherapy due to a homologous recombination defect is retained. We conclude that oligonucleotide aCGH data can be mapped to and used in the previously developed and validated BAC aCGH classifiers. Our findings suggest that it is possible to map copy number data from any other technology in a similar way.

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the second most frequently occurring histological breast cancer subtype after invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), accounting for around 10% of all breast cancers. The molecular processes that drive the development of ILC are still largely unknown. We have performed a comprehensive genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic analysis of a large ILC patient cohort and present here an integrated molecular portrait of ILC. Mutations in CDH1 and in the PI3K pathway are the most frequent molecular alterations in ILC. We identified two main subtypes of ILCs: (i) an immune related subtype with mRNA up-regulation of PD-L1, PD-1 and CTLA-4 and greater sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents in representative cell line models; (ii) a hormone related subtype, associated with Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) and gain of chromosomes 1q and 8q and loss of chromosome 11q. Using the somatic mutation rate and eIF4B protein level, we identified three groups with different clinical outcomes, including a group with extremely good prognosis. We provide a comprehensive overview of the molecular alterations driving ILC and have explored links with therapy response. This molecular characterization may help to tailor treatment of ILC through the application of specific targeted, chemo- and/or immune-therapies.

Background Preclinical studies in breast cancer models showed that BRCA1 or BRCA2 deficient cell lines, when compared to BRCA proficient cell lines, are extremely sensitive to PARP1 inhibition. When combining the PARP1 inhibitor olaparib with cisplatin in a BRCA1-mutated breast cancer mouse model, the combination induced a larger response than either of the two compounds alone. Several clinical studies have investigated single agent therapy or combinations of both drugs, but no randomized clinical evidence exists for the superiority of carboplatin-olaparib versus standard of care therapy in patients with BRCA1- or BRCA2--mutated metastatic breast cancer. Methods/design This investigator-initiated study contains two parts. Part 1 is a traditional 3 + 3 dose escalation study of the carboplatin-olaparib combination followed by olaparib monotherapy. The carboplatin dose will be escalated from area under the curve (AUC) 3 to AUC 4 with an olaparib dose of 25 mg BID. Olaparib is subsequently escalated to 50, 75, and 100 mg BID until >1/6 of patients develop dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). The dose level below will be the maximum tolerable dose (MTD). It is expected that 15–20 patients are needed in Part I. In Part 2 BRCA1- or BRCA2-mutated HER2-negative breast cancer patients will be randomized between standard capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 BID day 1–14 q day 22, versus 2 cycles carboplatin-olaparib followed by olaparib monotherapy 300 mg BID. In total 104 events in 110 patients need to be observed to detect a 75 % clinically meaningful improvement in progression-free survival (PFS), from a median of 4 months (control) to 7 months (experimental) assuming a 2-year accrual and ≥6 months of follow-up with 80 % power (5 %, two-sided significance level). After progression on first line treatment, patients will receive physician’s best choice of paclitaxel, vinorelbine, eribulin, or capecitabine (experimental arm only) at standard dose. A compassionate use program of olaparib is available for patients in the standard arm after progression on second line treatment. Discussion Results might be pivotal for registration of olaparib as standard first line treatment in advanced BRCA1- or BRCA2-mutated breast cancer. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02418624. Registered on 9 March 2015. EudraCT number: 2013-005590-41. Registered on 15 October 2014. Protocol version 3.0. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1423-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is a breast cancer subtype comprising 10% of breast tumors. The majority of ILC (90%) are estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and therefore candidates for endocrine therapy. Unfortunately, de novo resistant to endocrine therapies occurs in 33% of women and a further 40% will relapse on treatment. Therefore, novel therapeutic targets are required for ILC. Deregulated transcription is a recurring theme in cancer, which can be due to epigenetic events. The bromdomain & extra-terminal domain (BET) family of proteins (BRD2, BRD3, BRD4, BRDT) function as chromatin readers that bind acetylated lysine residues on histones and regulate transcription. We performed RNA-Sequencing analysis on 61 primary ILC samples and found that high expression of BRD3 is associated with poor survival in ILC (log rank test, p=0.037). We validated this finding, that high expression of BRD3 is associated with poor survival, in a second cohort of 99 ILC primary samples from the METABRIC dataset (log rank test, p=0.0157). Next, we tested if ILC cell lines were sensitive to BET inhibition using the small molecule inhibitor JQ1, which inhibits all BET family proteins. JQ1 downregulates growth and survival genes in ILC cell lines including MYC, ER and BCL-XL. Pathway analysis following RNA sequencing revealed that JQ1 targets the apoptotic and Wnt signalling pathways in ILC cell lines. Interestingly, JQ1 inhibited the cell growth in all ILC cell lines tested, however apoptosis was only induced in two ILC cell lines. Furthermore, ILC cell lines which were relatively resistant to JQ1-induced apoptosis expressed both the BCL-2 and BCL-XL anti-apoptotic proteins. This led us to assess the combination of JQ1 and the BH3 mimetics, ABT-199 and ABT-263. ABT-199 is a selective small molecule inhibitor of BCL-2, whereas ABT-263 is an inhibitor of BCL-2, BCL-XL and BCL-W proteins. We found the combination of JQ1 and ABT-263, but not the combination of JQ1 & ABT-199, to be synergistic and enhance apoptosis in ILC cell lines. This is in accordance with BH3 profiling of ILC cell lines which indicated that ILC cell lines are dependent on BCL-2/ BCL-XL proteins for cell survival. As JQ1 is a pan-BET family inhibitor, we also wish to determine which BET protein is responsible for sensitivity to JQ1. Following knockdown of each BET protein in the CAMA-1 cell line we found that BRD3 and BRD4 were responsible for loss of cell viability. Future work will include determining the specific role of BRD3 in ILC and the effectiveness of the JQ1 and ABT-263 combination in vivo. Our work suggests that inhibition of BET proteins in combination with BH3 mimetics may be a rational therapeutic combination for ILC. Citation Format: Louise Walsh, Bruce Moran, Sudipto Das, Finbarr Tarrant, Philip Schouten, Suet-Feung Chin, Rene Bernards, Carlos Caldas, William Gallagher, Tríona Ní Chonghaile*, Darran O'Connor*. Epigenetic modulators for the treatment of invasive lobular carcinoma breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4674. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-4674

Background: PD-1 blockade has emerged as an effective treatment for a subset of cancer patients. Studies have shown that PD-L1 expression is associated with likelihood of response to PD-1 blockade. In order to select the right breast cancer patient for immunotherapy, characterization of the immune landscape of breast tumors is required. Therefore, we assessed PD-L1 expression and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in different breast tumor subtypes and the link with prognosis. We also sequenced a panel of genes to assess the mutational load in triple negative tumors (TNBC) and investigate the association with PD-L1 positive TILs. Material and methods: We analyzed 438 tumor samples from breast cancer patients of all ages treated between 1986 and 2007 with surgery, with or without adjuvant therapy. PD-L1 was stained using whole slide specimens (E1L3N® antibody) after methodological validation. Pathologists quantified TILs based on International TILs Working Group recommendations and scored PD-L1 based on the percentage of positive (tumor and/or immune) cells; as negative if 0%, positive if ≥1%, and high if >50%. Mutational load was assessed based on DNA kinome sequencing. Associations were measured by Cox/logistic regression model, including pathological variables. Multiplex imaging of 20 immune-infiltrated areas from four ER negative tumors were performed using the Vectra® system based on immunofluorescence staining panel of: CD4, CD68, CD8, FOXP3 and PD-L1. Results: PD-L1 expression and TILs were higher in ductal (compared with lobular), high grade and estrogen receptor (ER)-negative tumors (p50%) was significantly associated with better DMFS: HR=0.51; 95%CI: 0.27-0.98. TNBC with high PD-L1 expression of TILs (>50%) showed an association with increased mutation load (p=0.019) and a trend for better DMFS (HR=0.41; 95%CI: 0.16-1.04) compared with tumors lacking TILs. Further characterization of PD-L1 positivity in the immune-infiltrated cells was conducted by a multiplex imaging analysis. Preliminary results indicated that PD-L1 is expressed in CD68+, CD4+, FOXP3+ and CD8+ immune-cells. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that PD-L1 positive TILs are associated with worse prognosis in ER-positive breast cancer and with better outcome in ER-negative group. In TNBC, high mutational load correlates with high PD-L1 positive TILs. Citation Format: Marcelo Sobral-Leite, Koen Van de Vijver, Magali Michaut, Hugo M. Horlings, Tesa M. Severson, Philip C. Schouten, Rianne van der Linden, Kelly Kersten, Anna Marie Mulligan, Nayana Weerasooriya, Joyce Sanders, Ashley Cimino-Mathews, Dennis Peters, Gerrit K. Hooijer, Erik Hooijberg, Annegien Broeks, Rene Bernards, Sabine Linn, Irene L. Andrulis, Marc J. van de Vijver, Lodewyk F. Wessels, Marleen Kok, Karin E. de Visser, Marjanka K. Schmidt. PD-L1 positive tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and mutational load in breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 575. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-575

5546 Background: BRCA associated cancers show a distinct pattern of genomic gains and losses that is associated with impaired repair of DNA double-strand breaks via homologous recombination (HR). We investigated whether BRCA1- and BRCA2-like classifiers could predict BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status in ovarian cancer. In addition, we explored whether promoter hypermethylation or mutations in other genes involved in DNA repair associate with a BRCA-like profile in ovarian cancer. Methods: The AGO-TR1 cohort study (NCT02222883 ) enrolled 525 consecutive patients with primary (PR) and platinum sensitive relapsed (RE) ovarian cancer to perform paired mutational analysis of germline and tumor tissue. We performed mutation panel sequencing, BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation and low-coverage whole genome sequencing to classify samples as BRCA1-like or BRCA2-like in 298 ovarian cancer samples (PR: n = 159, RE: n = 139). Results: A BRCA-like profile was observed in 58.1% of the samples without germline or somatic mutation in BRCA1/2 (n = 179; BRCA1-like: n = 26, BRCA2-like: n = 23, BRCA1- and 2-like: n = 55). There was no significant difference between PR- and RE-cases (54.5% vs 61.3%). 64 of 70 BRCA1 germline mutation carriers could be identified by the BRCA1-like classifier (sensitivity: 0.91). The BRCA2-like classifier identified BRCA2 germline mutation carrier with a sensitivity of 0.71 (17 of 24). The complementary use of both classifiers led to the detection of 22 of 25 somatic mutations in BRCA1 (16/16) or - 2 (6/9). Remarkably, 12 of 13 tumor samples from germline RAD51C mutation carriers were recognized by the BRCA1-like classifier (sensitivity: 0.92). No correlation of PALB2 mutation status (n = 7) with BRCA-like profile was observed. Of 28 tumor samples with a BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation 26 had a BRCA1-like profile (sensitivity: 0.93). Conclusions: A high number of ovarian cancer cases display a BRCA-like profile. Mutations (germline and somatic) in BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51C as well as BRCA1 hypermethylation strongly associate with a BRCA-like profile and can explain 146 of 212 cases. Future studies will investigate whether the classifiers identify patients who benefit from HR-deficiency directed approaches beyond the BRCA mutation status. Clinical trial information: NCT02222883.

Lymph-node metastasis (LNM) predict high recurrence rates in breast cancer patients. Systemic treatment aims to eliminate (micro)metastatic cells. However decisions regarding systemic treatment depend largely on clinical and molecular characteristics of primary tumours. It remains, however, unclear to what extent metastases resemble the cognate primary breast tumours, especially on a genomic level, and as such will be eradicated by the systemic therapy chosen. In this study we used high-resolution aCGH to investigate DNA copy number differences between primary breast cancers and their paired LNMs. To date, no recurrent LNM-specific genomic aberrations have been identified using array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis. In our study we employ a high-resolution platform and we stratify on different breast cancer subtypes, both aspects that might have underpowered previously performed studies.To test the possibility that genomic instability in triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) might cause increased random and potentially also recurrent copy number aberrations (CNAs) in their LNMs, we studied 10 primary TNBC-LNM pairs and 10 ER-positive (ER+) pairs and verified our findings adding additionally 5 TNBC-LNM and 22 ER+-LNM pairs. We found that all LNMs clustered nearest to their matched tumour except for two cases, of which one was due to the presence of two distinct histological components in one tumour. We found no significantly altered CNAs between tumour and their LNMs in the entire group or in the subgroups. Within the TNBC subgroup, no absolute increase in CNAs was found in the LNMs compared to their primary tumours, suggesting that increased genomic instability does not lead to more CNAs in LNMs. Our findings suggest a high clonal relationship between primary breast tumours and its LNMs, at least prior to treatment, and support the use of primary tumour characteristics to guide adjuvant systemic chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

In a number of studies evaluating checkpoint blockade efficacy in cancer treatment, high mutational load of the tumor has been shown to correlate with clinical response, consistent with the notion that T-cell recognition of mutation derived (neo)-antigens plays a sizable role in immune based tumor eradication. Mutational load varies widely between and within malignancies, and is now frequently used as a proxy for the foreignness of cancers. However, in the absence of any well-defined reference points, it is difficult to understand which human tumors can be considered substantially foreign on the basis of the neo-antigens they carry. Here we aim to benchmark the foreign antigen space of human cancers against a series of pathogen genomes for which T cell control has been documented. For this purpose, we developed a neo-antigen prediction pipeline that processes single nucleotide variants, indels and structural variants and filters candidate neo-peptides based on i). probability of successful proteasomal processing, ii). HLA-affinity, iii). RNA expression and iv). dissimilarity from self proteins. Having gathered a set of experimentally identified HIV-derived peptides, we determined the precision of our pipeline to be ∼40% for the HLA*A0201 allele of MHC-I, a substantially higher precision than achieved using prior methodologies. Using this strategy, we aim to answer three classes of questions. First, how do the foreign antigen spaces of different tumors and tumor subtypes compare to the predicted neo-antigen load of human pathogens which are known to be sufficiently foreign to be controlled by T-cells? Second, is the foreignness of virus-induced cancers, such as EBV-positive lymphomas and HPV+ head and neck carcinomas and cervical cancer primarily determined by viral proteins or by DNA damage derived antigens? Third, what are the total neo-antigen yields and yield rates of different types of DNA damage? In this, we contrast variants by transcript effects (e.g. single nucleotide variants vs. indels), their predicted role in oncogenesis (i.e. driver vs. passenger variants) or their likelihood of having been generated by any of the mutational processes operative in the tumor in question. Results of these and other analyses will be presented. Citation Format: Maarten Slagter, Lorenzo Fanchi, Marit M. van Buuren, Jorg J A Calis, Philip Schouten, Sabine Linn, Marlous Hoogstraat, Arno Velds, Hendrik Veelken, Ron M. Kerkhoven, Andrew Menzies, Ludmil B. Alexandrov, Michael Stratton, Lodewyk Wessels, Ton N. Schumacher. Benchmarking the foreign antigen space of human malignancies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Second CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference: Translating Science into Survival; 2016 Sept 25-28; New York, NY. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2016;4(11 Suppl):Abstract nr A009.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is defined by absent expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and non-overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), representing a heterogeneous subgroup of breast cancer with substantial genotypic and phenotypic diversity. TNBC patients commonly exhibit poor prognosis and high relapse rates at early stages after conventional treatments. Currently, there is a lack of biomarkers and targeted therapies for the management of TNBC. During tumour development and progression, alterations in cellular behaviour are frequently linked with kinase expression and activity. Here, we aimed to identify novel kinase targets that may play a pivotal role in the progression of TNBC and, thus, offer new therapeutic vantage points. We initially focused on identifying kinases correlated with differential outcome. Using publicly available transcriptomic data from a collated set of TNBC patients (n = 483), we identified 9 kinases that were significantly associated with survival at the mRNA level. From this in silico screen, CDK7 (cyclin-dependent kinase 7) was found to be correlated with poor recurrence-free survival. CDK7's trait as a marker of poor prognosis was further validated within another TNBC cohort (n=109) via assessment of a tissue microarray generated as part of the RATHER Consortium (www.ratherproject.com). At the protein level, high CDK7 expression was associated with poor breast cancer-specific, recurrence-free and distant recurrence-free survival. To evaluate CDK7 as a therapeutic target in TNBC, two TNBC cell lines (BT-549 and MDA-MB-231) were selected to evaluate phenotypic alterations post shRNA-mediated CDK7 knockdown. CDK7 silencing led to decreased cell proliferation, colony formation and migration in vitro. CDK7 down-regulation also increased TNBC cell sensitivity to doxorubicin. BS-181 and THZ1, two highly specific CDK7 inhibitors, attenuated TNBC tumour growth by inducing G2/M phase cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, as well as down-regulation of RNAPII phosphorylation, an indication of global RNA transcription inhibition. Moreover, the covalent CDK7 inhibitor THZ1 demonstrated 1000-fold higher potency than BS-181. Inhibition of global RNA transcription preferentially affects proteins with short half-lives. Accordingly, we detected a reduction in the expression of the anti-apoptotic protein MCL-1 in both cell lines. Next, we assessed anti-apoptotic dependence in MDA-MB-231 cells following treatment with THZ1 via BH3 profiling technology, and observed an increased response to the BAD and HRK peptides, inferring an elevated survival dependence on BCL-2/BCL-XL. We subsequently evaluated the combination of the BCL-2/BCL-XL inhibitor ABT-263 with THZ1 and discovered a synergistic inhibition of cell growth and apoptosis. Resulting combination index (CI) values demonstrated that synergistic cell death occurred following combined treatment with THZ1 and ABT-263/ABT-199 at various doses in both TNBC cell lines tested. Our data implicate high CDK7 expression as a promising biomarker of poor prognosis in TNBC. Moreover, these findings suggest that targeting CDK7, combined with the BCL-2/BCL-XL inhibitor ABT-263, may be a useful therapeutic strategy for TNBC. Citation Format: Gallagher WM, Li B, Ni Chonghaile T, Fan Y, Klinger R, O'Connor AE, Conroy E, Tarrant F, O'Hurley G, Mallya Udupi G, Gaber A, Chin S-F, Schouten PC, Dubois T, Linn S, Jirstrom K, Caldas C, Bernards R, O'Connor DP. CDK7: A marker of poor prognosis and tractable therapeutic target in triple-negative breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD3-01.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents a heterogeneous subgroup of breast cancer with substantial genotypic and phenotypic diversity. TNBC patients commonly exhibit poor prognosis and high relapse rates at early stages after conventional treatments. Currently, there is a lack of biomarkers and targeted therapies for the management of TNBC. During tumor development and progression, alterations in cellular behavior are frequently linked with kinase expression and activity. Here, we aimed to identify novel kinase targets that may play a pivotal role in the progression of TNBC and, thus, offer new therapeutic vantage points. We initially focused on identifying kinases linked to differential outcome. Using publicly available transcriptomic data from a collated set of TNBC patients (n = 483), we identified 9 kinases that were associated with survival at the mRNA level. From this screen, CDK7 (cyclin-dependent kinase 7) was found to be correlated with poor relapse-free survival. CDK7's trait as a marker of poor prognosis was further validated within another TNBC cohort (n=109) via assessment of a tissue microarray generated as part of the RATHER Consortium (www.ratherproject.com). At the protein level, high CDK7 expression was associated with poor breast cancer-specific survival, recurrence-free survival and distance recurrence-free survival. To evaluate CDK7 as a therapeutic target in TNBC, two TNBC breast cancer cell lines (BT-549 and MDA-MB-231) were selected to evaluate phenotypic alterations post shRNA-mediated CDK7 knockdown. CDK7 silencing led to decreased cell proliferation, colony formation and migration in vitro. CDK7 down-regulation also increased TNBC cell sensitivity to the chemotherapeutic agent doxorubicin. BS-181 and THZ1, two highly specific CDK7 inhibitors, attenuated TNBC tumor growth by inducing G2/M cell cycle arrest and global RNA transcription. Moreover, the covalent CDK7 inhibitor THZ1 demonstrated 1000-fold higher potency than BS-181. Inhibition of global RNA transcription preferentially affects proteins with short half-lives. Accordingly, we detected a reduction in the expression of the anti-apoptotic protein MCL-1 in both cell lines. Next, we assessed anti-apoptotic dependence in MDA-MB-231 cells following treatment with THZ1 via the BH3 profiling technology, and observed an increased response to the BAD and HRK peptides, inferring an elevated survival dependence on BCL-2/BCL-XL. We subsequently evaluated the combination of the BCL-2/BCL-XL inhibitor ABT-263 with THZ1 and discovered synergistic responses in cell growth inhibition and apoptosis. In vivo testing of the efficacy of the CDK7 inhibitor, THZ1, in a xenograft model of TNBC was also carried out. Preliminary data revealed that tumor growth was suppressed following daily treatment with 10mg/kg of THZ1. Our data implicate that high CDK7 expression is a promising biomarker of poor prognosis in TNBC. Moreover, these findings suggest that targeting CDK7, combined with BCL-2/BCL-XL inhibitor ABT-263, may be a useful therapeutic strategy for TNBC. Citation Format: Bo Li, Triona Ni Chonghaile, Yue Fan, Rut Klinger, Aisling E. O'Connor, Emer Conroy, Finbarr Tarrant, Gillian O'Hurley, Girish Mallya Udupi, Alexander Gaber, Suet-Feung Chin, Helen A. Bardwell, Philip C. Schouten, Thierry Dubois, Sabine Linn, Karin Jirstrom, Carlos Caldas, Rene Bernards, Darran P. O'Connor, William M. Gallagher. CDK7: A marker of poor prognosis and tractable therapeutic target in triple-negative breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Breast Cancer Research; Oct 17-20, 2015; Bellevue, WA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2016;14(2_Suppl):Abstract nr B06.

The lack of markers to predict chemotherapy responses in patients poses a major handicap in cancer treatment. We searched for gene expression patterns that correlate with docetaxel or cisplatin response in a mouse model for breast cancer associated with BRCA1 deficiency. Array-based expression profiling did not identify a single marker gene predicting docetaxel response, despite an increase in Abcb1 (P-glycoprotein) expression that was sufficient to explain resistance in several poor responders. Intertumoral heterogeneity explained the inability to identify a predictive gene expression signature for docetaxel. To address this problem, we used a novel algorithm designed to detect differential gene expression in a subgroup of the poor responders that could identify tumors with increased Abcb1 transcript levels. In contrast, standard analytical tools, such as significance analysis of microarrays, detected a marker only if it correlated with response in a substantial fraction of tumors. For example, low expression of the Xist gene correlated with cisplatin hypersensitivity in most tumors, and it also predicted long recurrence-free survival of HER2-negative, stage III breast cancer patients treated with intensive platinum-based chemotherapy. Our findings may prove useful for selecting patients with high-risk breast cancer who could benefit from platinum-based therapy. Cancer Res; 72(9); 2350–61. ©2012 AACR.

In previous studies, high expression of XIST and low expression of 53BP1 were respectively associated with poor systemic therapy outcome in patients and therapy resistance in BRCA1-deficient mouse tumor models, but have not been evaluated in BRCA1-deficient patients. Previously, we demonstrated that classifying breast cancer copy number profiles as BRCA1-like or non–BRCA1-like identified patients enriched for defects in BRCA1 that benefit from high-dose (HD) alkylating chemotherapy compared with a conventional standard regimen. We investigated whether XIST and 53BP1 expression predicted poor outcome of HD chemotherapy within 28 BRCA1-like patients from a trial randomizing between HD [4 cycles 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide (FEC) followed by 1 cycle HD carboplatin, thiotepa, cyclophosphamide] or conventional chemotherapy (5 cycles FEC), for which both XIST and 53BP1 statuses were available. High RNA expression of XIST (n = 5) and low protein expression of 53BP1 (n = 3) expression did not coincide. Patients with either one had poor outcome after treatment with HD chemotherapy, whereas patients with low expression of XIST and high expression of 53BP1 derived substantial benefit of this regimen on recurrence-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival, corroborating preclinical findings. XIST and 53BP1 may be predictive biomarkers in BRCA1-like breast cancer. Mol Cancer Ther; 15(1); 190–8. ©2015 AACR.

11018 Background: DNA copy number profiles identify patients with a defect in BRCA1 associated with a homologous recombination DNA repair defect. We previously showed that patients with a BRCA1-lik...

Background: The Rational Therapy for Breast Cancer (RATHER) Consortium aims to identify novel kinase targets for therapy in poor-prognosis subtypes of breast cancer for which there are currently no targeted therapies available. In this project, the focus is on invasive lobular carcinomas (ILC), which represent 10% of breast tumors. The main strength of the RATHER project is the unique combination of comprehensive molecular data together with detailed clinical information, which enables translation of state-of-the art genomics analyses to the clinic. Our main goal is to identify and validate novel kinase targets for breast cancer therapy in a comprehensive way using large-scale and complementary genomics data (DNA and RNA sequence, copy number variation, gene expression and protein expression). Integrated analysis of these molecular data is performed to define molecular subtypes of ILC with differential clinical outcome. Methods: One hundred and fifty ILC samples (fresh frozen) with >5 years follow-up were collected from two institutes (Cambridge, Netherlands Cancer Institute). All samples were processed following one standard operating protocol to isolate RNA, DNA and protein of high quality. We used a five-pronged approach to identify and validate novel kinase targets for therapy in ILC, namely i) direct re-sequencing of the kinome of 150 ILC breast tumors, ii) determination of abundance and activation status of kinases in these tumors by reverse phase protein lysate array (RPPA) technology, iii) determination of copy number variation (CNV) by genome-wide SNP arrays, iv) mRNA quantitation of both genome and kinome using DNA microarrays and v) RNAseq of a subset of ILC tumors. ILC are compared to triple negative, which allows us to highlight differences and/or similarities between these subtypes and provide clues for therapeutic targets. Results: Data from these independent genome-scale technologies were integrated, yielding a prioritized list of potential kinase targets for therapy in ILC breast cancer. Deep sequencing of the kinome has revealed somatic mutations characteristic of ILC, which are currently being validated via mass spectrometry-based genotyping technology and their possible effects confirmed with gene expression, protein expression and phosphorylation changes. In addition, on a subset of the ILC samples, RNA sequencing was performed to confirm expression of particular mutants. Known gene mutations in ILC such as loss of CDH1 were confirmed. Moreover, the PI3K pathway is found to be frequently altered (50% of the samples). Gene expression analysis, as well as integrative analysis of CNV and gene expression data revealed subsets of ILCs that significantly regulate alternate biological processes and show differential clinical outcome. Such biological subsets are currently being validated with clinical and follow-up data. Updated results will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion: The RATHER project aims to deliver proof-of-concept for novel therapeutic interventions, together with companion molecular diagnostic assays for patient stratification, for up to 10% of breast cancer patients, where current treatment options are unsatisfactory. Ongoing validation of a number of potential targets proves to be promising. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P6-04-02.